Saturday, 31 October 2009
Friday, 30 October 2009
So here's a few stories that I'll leave to you to interpret for yourself...
England Chief Medical Officer Calls H1N1 Vaccine Resistors "Extremists"
(original story - Medical chief warns of 'extremists' attacking flu vaccination campaign)
When moms get flu shot, babies benefit too: study
Statin drugs may lower deaths from flu: study
(story explained and broken down by Mike Adams)
The best resource I have seen in terms of learning about the 'other' side of the vaccine argument is the list of delicious and nutritious vaccine ingredients available here:
Why is it that we believe injecting such foreign substances directly into our bloodstream is a healthy thing to do? Who made us believe such things?
Thursday, 29 October 2009
Thanks to your trustworthy government funded news source, you can visit both.
Australia coastal living at risk
Australians may have to leave coastal areas as rising sea levels threaten homes, according to a new report.
The Parliamentary Committee report says urgent action is needed, as seas are expected to rise by 80cm (31 inches).
About 80% of Australians live in coastal areas, and the report recommends new laws banning further development in coastal regions.
(In other words, it's just a sick attempt at land grabbing, using the fraud of manmade climate change as a cover to seize property from citizens, to be bought up by rich fckrs for knockdown prices at a later date. It's how the envirocon works.)
Head-to-head: What next for the US economy?
Allow me to spare you much of their academic waffle...
"John Silvia: I do not see the case for a double-dip recession...this recovery is being led by federal spending"
"Mark Perry: I think the recession ended in June and I also see no chance of a double-dip recession...we will have a 'jobless recovery' again through 2010...there is only a moderate risk of inflation"
"Mark Perry: I think the dollar's decline will stabilise before it can damage the economy"
"John Silvia: I agree on the forward momentum"
"Mark Perry: A strong economic recovery could surprise everybody"
Really, fellas? Where did the BBCCCP Pravda find these people? They've either got their head in the clouds or a fat wad of cash in their pocket. Probably both. Celente would school them.
The hilarious thing is that people will still defend the existence of the BBC because it 'provides people with a service' or some such argument. I for one say we'd be a lot better - and more informed (or should that be less misinformed) - without it.
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
Look, consider this. The Obama family are clearly natural health literate, judging by Michelle's eating habits. Call them whatever you want, evil, liars, sellouts, but not stupid. Quite the opposite.
They know the vaccine is useless because the disease isn't serious enough to kill anyone save the severely immunosupressed. (Hence the prevalence of people with 'pre-existing conditions' who supposedly died 'from H1N1')
They know the vaccine has received no long-term testing (physically impossible due to the fact the various vaccines have only been developed a couple of months ago) and has been approved under emergency conditions.
They know that there is no health benefit from mercury consumption, nor from that of in-vaccine squalene. (Unless you call Autism and Gulf War Syndrome 'benefits'.) And let's pretend cancer-causing vaccine ingredient, formaldehyde doesn't exist too. It's one of those crazy conspiracy theories.
They know that some of the things that pass for 'modern medicine' were in no small part an invention of Nazis and ex-Nazis (if you don't believe me, look up the history of BASF and Bayer, two of the biggest anti-health companies today...you'll be horrified!)
They know that Vitamin D is actually a hormone that is directly correlated with immune system functioning, and therefore is a much safer guard against flu than vaccines or drugs (but the government and health authorities haven't deigned to tell you about this...instead, you're told to just 'wash your hands' and 'cough into your elbow')
No, I don't think Obama's daughters will really have been vaccinated.
As they say, "Pics - or it didn't happen".
Hardly anyone wants a swine flu shot (priceless news clip...they had 5000 vaccines and only shifted 200 of them!)
Monday, 26 October 2009
1. They've been constantly attacked by the media, particularly Lord Mandelson the Rothschild Lapdog.
2. Because they're the Little Guy.
3. It's a strike. How can you not support a strike?
4. I'm not relying on RM for any urgent mail.
5. Because some of them showed up to strike drunk. Class.
6. Inevitably, the result of the disruption is a surge in demand for private postal services. Sob. Marketplace defeats government again, eh?
Face it, RM is as unsustainable as every facet of our (mostly) post-WW2 socialisation project.
Sunday, 25 October 2009
Beware of swine flu internet scams, counterfeit medicines
"Soon, Deniers will wear pretty yellow stars, so that everyone can see that they hate the Earth, and love big oil companies" - not taken from a new Greenpeace campaign on 'manmade' climate change.
Climate Change Denial on Wikipedia
Peak Oil Fraud
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Webster Tarpley on Malthusian Madness
Saturday, 24 October 2009
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
But sometimes it's so epic that it warrants a short mention, if only because it gave me a laugh and 'cause, frankly, the irony is delicious. It's the decisive moment from Sunderland's 1-0 win over Liverpool at the weekend.
See, a Liverpool fan threw a beach ball onto the pitch before the game started, and within minutes it played out its role: being in the right place at the right time to deflect Darren Bent's shot which resulted in the only goal of the game. Bwahahaha.
But Sunderland played better and deserved it. So meh.
There's even a video of Hitler reacting to this (is there anything there isn't a Hitler video on YT for?)
What impressed me when reading the comments to all these X-Factor demographic Pop Culture zombie videos, is there was the occasional comment saying 'say NO to the swine flu vaccine', even in this 'mainstream' (read: uninformed) corner of the internet. Impressive.
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
Again, there will be NO end in sight to this tyranny, without having the stomach to look objectively at the events of 9/11, that dangerous taboo.
Because after all, if we are threatened by a global Islamist terror network that seeks to strike at any opportunity, then we need cameras in everyone's home. We need ever more scans at airports. We need the iWatch Stasi 'keeping us safe'. We need gun bans, because after all the terrorists could get one. We need police checkpoints everywhere to fight the terrorists.
But if criminal elements within our own governments are partly or wholly responsible for the terrorism we have seen over the last few decades, most prominently 9/11, then we don't need a police state to protect us from terrorism - it would be like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. Which we have done, in my opinion.
More terrorism is inevitable, especially as people get mad at their governments. Terrorism turns people into obedient sheep - IF they believe external elements committed it.
If they discover that usually, as in the case of 9/11 and probably 7/7 too, the terror was sanctioned by their criminal elements of their own governments and then covered up, then there can be a wholesome peaceful revolution in which the criminals who are responsible for this - and I believe it to be a handful of people only - can be held accountable.
There doesn't need to be an iWatch. Unless you mean iWatch the criminal government...
- Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11
- Terrorstorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism
- Loose Change 9/11
- Zeitgeist (9/11 section of the film)
- Peer-reviewed paper proving active nanothermite explosive present in dust from WTC towers
- Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Evidence Presentation (slideshow)
- Popular Mechanics' Assault On 9/11 Truth (the self-styled Debunkers are the ones who have been debunked)
- Reply to Popular Mechanics re: 9/11
- 29 Structural and Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Exlposive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 High-Rise Buildings on 9/11
- The 9/11 'Stand Down' Order (why fighters failed to intercept the hijacked planes)
- Who is Osama Bin Laden? (a CIA man, that's who)
The best encouragement you'll ever need to look at the details of 9/11 for yourself:
Monday, 19 October 2009
Homebuyers face questions on alcohol and smoking under new mortgage rules
(I guess those who advocate more pre-emptive regulation forget that government always finds it easier to 'crack down' on ordinary people than on their cronies in big business...)
Homebuyers could be forced to provide detailed information about the amount of money they spend on alcohol each month to qualify for a new mortgage under a new clampdown on reckless lending.
In a sweeping review of the mortgage market published today, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) said lenders needed to be far more rigorous about their financial checks of potential borrowers.
It said lenders should delve deeper into homebuyers' personal spending including the amount they spend on alcohol and tobacco.
Spending on shoes, clothes and childcare could also be assessed under a new, industry-wide "affordability test".
At present, the FSA does not prescribe rules about assessing a consumers' ability to repay a mortgage and practices vary from one lender to the next.
In its document, the City regulator said: "There is clearly a responsibility on all lenders to extend credit only where a consumer can afford it and, in our view, a robust assessment of both income and expenditure is key to ensuring affordable mortgages.
"We propose to require all lenders to assess the level of a consumer's expenditure in determining the affordability of a mortgage product, to ensure that lending decisions are based on a consumer's free disposable income."
It conceded though that there were some flaws with its plan with consumers potentially underestimating their spend or "failing to incorporate past experiences into their budgeting".
The new measures, which aim to stamp out risky lending that has been criticised for compounding the financial crisis and tipping hundreds of thousands of homebuyers into negative equity, also include a plan to ban self-certified mortgages, dubbed "liar's loans”, and to stop lenders from exploiting consumers who have fallen behind on their mortgage payments.
It also proposed that the FSA should regulate mortgages for landlords for the first time.
Self-certification mortgages were aimed at self-employed people with irregular incomes. The mortgages, which did not require proof of income, accounted for one third of new loans in 2007. Their proposed banning was first revealed in The Times last week.
But the FSA stopped short of ruling out "supersized mortgages" by introducing caps on loan-to-value, loan-to-income or debt-to-income multiples.
Such mortgages were typified by Northern Rock which, at the height of the housing boom, offered 125 per cent home loan deals.
Gordon Brown wrote in a newspaper article at the weekend that it was "critical we end reckless banking practices that have left so many people worried about their finances".
Jon Pain, managing director of supervision at the FSA, said: "The mortgage market has seen extraordinary upheaval over the past 18 months and while it has worked well for the vast majority of borrowers, some have suffered great financial distress. We recognise that we need to bring about a step change in regulation."
He said there had been a "mutual assumption by too many borrowers and lenders that the good times could not end."
The new reforms, he said, would ensure firms "only lend to people who can afford to pay back the money".
Isn't it odd how every solution to the problems these bastards created, is more use of bureaucracy against the ordinary people? What a coincidence.
Planet facing 'catastrophe' - Brown
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has warned that the planet is facing "catastrophe" if action to stop rising greenhouse gas emissions was not agreed at forthcoming UN talks on climate change.
Mr Brown said letting the emissions which cause global warming run unchecked would have massive economic, human and environmental costs.
He warned that ignoring emissions would leave the UK facing a future of killer heatwaves, floods and droughts.
In a speech to 17 leading nations meeting in a bid to make progress towards agreeing a new treaty on climate change at UN talks in December, he warned of the "heavy price" of failure - with no Plan B for the planet if negotiations collapse.
Failing to tackle climate change would have an economic impact worse than that of the two world wars and the Great Depression, he said, but action could provide economic opportunities in green jobs and technology.
He told the Major Economies Forum - gathered in London for talks which aim to narrow the gap between different countries on areas of dispute ahead of the climate summit in Copenhagen - that a deal was possible.
But with less than two months to go before the crunch UN conference, he warned countries were not making progress quickly enough to reach agreement and urged leaders to step in to break the impasse.
He said heads of state should work together directly to secure a deal with binding targets for rich countries to cut their emissions in the coming decades, action by developing nations and funding to help the poorest countries cope with the impact of climate change.
The Prime Minister's warning over the consequences of failure were welcomed by environmental groups, who want rich countries primarily responsible for the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to take the lead in signing up to tougher emissions cuts.
But opposition MPs and some campaigners criticised the gap between Mr Brown's rhetoric and the Government's policies on airport expansion and new polluting fossil fuel power plants.
Film: Global Warming or Global Governance?
Sunday, 18 October 2009
Note: MK Ultra was the name of a partly-declassified CIA mind control project during the 1950s-60s. Subjects were drugged (mostly with LSD) often without their knowledge or consent, in an attempt to test potential mind control substances. Some were given LSD daily for over two months. In related experiments conducted in Canada, electro-shock 'therapy' was used in an attempt to cause amnesia. The extent of, and damage caused by this experimentation, as well as whether such inhumane testing continues, remains unknown.
The wavelength gently grows,
Coercive notions re-evolve,
A universe is trapped inside a tear,
It resonates the core,
Creates unnatural laws,
Replaces love and happiness with fear
How much deception can you take?
How many lies will you create?
How much longer until you break?
Your minds about to fall
And they are breaking through,
They are breaking through,
Now were falling,
We are losing control
Invisible to all,
The mind becomes a wall,
All of history deleted with one stroke
How much deception can you take?
How many lies will you create?
How much longer until you break?
Your minds about to fall
And they are breaking through,
They are breaking through,
Now were falling,
We are losing control
(The paragraph I'm talking about in the above link is close to the end, the 11th last paragraph of the text as it appears)
In my edited form it says:
"It is not unreasonable to anticipate the development of...[a global] disarmament police"
I inserted [a global] to provide limited context in the limited space desirable for my blog. So, you may ask, is that accurate? Be careful what you wish for - the context only makes the quote more horrifying, not less.
Here's the full paragraph:
"It is not unreasonable to anticipate the development of an ad hoc disarmament police which will have its greatest strength in the air. How easily the spirit of an air police can be de-nationalised is shown by the instance of the air patrols on the United States-Canadian border, to which President Roosevelt drew my attention. There is a lot of smuggling along that border and the planes now play an important part in its suppression. At first the United States and Canada had each their own planes. Then in a wave of common sense, the two services were pooled. Each plane now carries a United States and Canadian customs officer. When contraband is spotted the plane comes down on it and which officer acts is determined by the destination of the smuggled goods. There we have a pattern for a world struggling through federation to collective unity. An ad hoc disarmament police with its main strength in the air would necessarily fall into close co-operation with the various other world police activities. In a world where criminals can fly anywhere, the police must be able to fly anywhere too. Already we have a world-wide network of competent men fighting the white-slave traffic, the drug traffic and so forth. The thing begins already."
He's talking about how to coerce nations into giving up their national sovereignty, and using international crime as a justification for international governance. An international disarmament police. Like these lovely chaps:
Turn your guns in. Report all illegal civilian firearms to your nearest UN security station. March forward, all those with no chip implant move to the left please. Thank you for your continued co-operation with Pandemic Response. [for now it's still considered science fiction...just!]
Although, you may still think I haven't provided enough evidence to justify using the word 'global', but if that's the case then read the rest of 'The New World Order', the whole book is about the coming socialist world government which Wells sees as both inevitable and a good thing.
But it's just a Conspiracy Theory...
Saturday, 17 October 2009
So their profits are falling. Boo hoo. Don't care.
But maybe if we had a nice new war, more people would watch TV, and the state would want more aircraft engines and so on from GE.
Oh wait, GE owns whole TV networks.
TV networks push war propaganda.
Public opinion influenced by media.
Government action influenced by public opinion.
Corporate profits influenced by government action.
Media agenda further influenced by corporate profits.
Public opinion further influenced by media agenda.
Government action further influenced by public opinion.
Corporate profits further influenced by government action.
War is a racket.
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a bit longer" - Henry Kissinger (source)
But isn't Iran a threat, a bunch of irrational people who want to get nuclear weapons to use in suicide terrorism in Western cities, and who is a clear and present danger to the world, so much so that they must be eliminated pre-emptively (i.e. before they do any of the things our media says they will do)?
"That which is presented without evidence, can also be dismissed without evidence"
But I'll present some anyway:
Friday, 16 October 2009
Well that was unexpected. In a way I'm not really bothered. I guess he's probably Kenyan, who cares. Of all the crimes being committed at this time, we're focusing on something as insignificant as this? I mean, you could get him out of office on this, but then what? Some other puppet fills his place and the same agenda continues.
Because it's not Barack's agenda, oh no. Whose agenda is it? Not an easy one to answer, but start looking at the think tanks and lobbyists that form a hidden-in-plain-sight 'shadow government'. And the finance oligarchs and their minions who have domineering roles amongst those think tanks.
The media knows you are probably mad right now, so they - instead of trying to suppress anger at the establishment as they used to - are now trying other ways of channelling it in such a way that no desirable change is acheived. A fine example of this is the Birth Certificate controversy. The establishment depends on your energy being wasted fighting anyone...but them.
In fact, that's the whole point of modern 'democracy' - to give camouflage to an invisible multi-family banking oligarchy behind the scenes. When people realise their government is doing evil, they are encouraged to choose a different 'leader', thinking this will yield beneficial change, though all the leaders encouraged by the media are mere puppets to the same 'inner party' of plutocrats. This is of course possible because ownership of the media is concentrated in a few corporate (and in some cases, state) hands.
So the media and what I might refer to as 'political popular culture', 'fake intellectual politics', or 'superficial politics', thrusts upon you many appealing causes that are designed to drain your attention and energy away from real and meaningful things. This is VITAL to any dictatorship. Look at the Colisseum in Rome. Modern day sports fanatics. It's the same game of social engineering - how to control a population. How to distract them.
You should know when your media is running with almighty distraction stories designed to fill headlines and thus fill your brain. Spot these superficial stories. Ignore them. They're eating your brain. Examples include:
- UK MPs Expenses (when we gave a trillion to the banks, we instead are told to obsess over a few mortgages)
- Oh noez! A terrorist plot to bomb somewhere! But luckily we arrested the people before they did anything (which, frankly, suggests to me that whichever agency did the arrest, are the people behind the fake plot) - exception: observe how the story will be exploited to further erode civil liberties, for example the recent 'bomb in the body' case used to justify full body scans at airports.
- Michael Jackson. All things Michael Jackson.
- What is the name of Obama's dog?
- Why was Michael Savage banned from Britain? (I know it's wrong, but face it, if it was anyone else but our beloved media figures no-one would care; people get their kids taken away unfairly all the time, for instance, that's a lot worse)
- Oh, did you see the big fight between Obama and Dick Cheney over torture? Wasn't it, like, ossum? (while they both fully ENDORSE torture in their ACTIONS, just not their WORDS. Obama's Exec Orders are even more pro-torture than Bush's)
- Has anyone noticed David Cameron rides a bike to work but has a car driving behind him? Let's have a long debate about whether this practice is better or worse for the environment than other politicians' methods of travel.
This is what I call 'fake intellectualism' at its best. I'm sure you've done it yourself, as have I in the past, until I learnt a little more about how the game works. You can see it in some blogs. Politico/Economist reader types are the most fixated with this phenomenon. Debating the superficial down to the last detail, but never even questioning the substantial.
"The beauty of the democratic systems of thought control, as contrasted with their clumsy totalitarian counterparts, is that they operate by subtly establishing on a voluntary basis--aided by the force of nationalism and media control by substantial interests--presuppositions that set the limits of debate, rather than by imposing beliefs with a bludgeon. Then let the debate rage; the more lively and vigorous it is, the better the propaganda system is served, since the presuppositions...are more firmly established. Those who do not accept the fundamental principles of state propaganda are simply excluded from the debate." - Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman (source)
I think Webster Tarpley said,
"If you're not fighting finance oligarchs, you're probably wasting your time." (from this 3hr video, if you really want the source)
Or words to that effect. One way or another, if you're not focusing on your enemy, the handful of banking families who we have allowed to gain unprecedented global power over the last two centuries - opposing their puppets, agendas and frauds (they do, after all, want 90+ percent of humanity dead; see here, here and here) - then your efforts are probably being channelled and wasted by media/pop culture fluff and superficial 'scandals' etc.
Don't let this brain be yours
Thursday, 15 October 2009
Who believes in the vaccine religion? Who believes what the drug companies, some of whom are offshoots of IG Farben, say?
(Specifically, Hoescht [no longer operational], BASF and Bayer are the companies that became independent when IG Farben was broken up after WWII. Now 'former' Nazis produce 'medicines' for your children. Just so you know.)
More info on the Pharmanazical sickness industry:
Friends of IG Farben
Nazi Connections to Allopathy
Meanwhile, the BBC wants us to believe vaccines are good and in fact you should submit to them:
Swine flu jabs starting next week
The swine flu vaccination programme will get under way in the UK next week, the government says.
Patients in hospital deemed at risk of the infection - including pregnant women and people with health problems - will get the jab from 21 October.
The following week will see GPs starting to call in patients until over 13m people in the priority groups have been vaccinated.
It comes as the number of deaths has hit 106 after another rise in cases. But the rate of increase is still short of the doubling that would represent a surge in cases.
Last week Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson said the slow-burning nature of the second peak now being seen in the UK may be a "lucky break" as it was buying time for the roll-out of the vaccination programme.
He has now confirmed that those immunisations will start next week and he urged all those identified in the priority groups to agree to have the jab.
There has been some concern about the situation regarding pregnant women as they have not been part of the clinical trial process that has tested the two jabs being used in the UK.
But experts have pointed out that a wealth of data exists on the use of seasonal flu vaccines on pregnant women - they are routinely included in the US programme, while those with health problems get the jab in the UK.
Sir Liam said it was important for pregnant women to be immunised as they have a particularly high risk of complications from swine flu - two pregnant women have died in the past week alone, including a 17-year-old from Scotland.
"The sensible approach to reducing risk is to get the vaccine. It will save lives." (yeah right!)
But Sir Liam said he was concerned about the postal strike as GPs send out letters to invite patients for vaccination.
Troops serving in Afghanistan will also be getting the vaccine, the government has announced.
A decision has yet to be taken over whether the rest of the population will be immunised, although the government has ordered enough vaccine for the whole population.
Sir Liam said while he was encouraged by the relatively slow rise in the new infections, he was worried about the increasing number of complications being seen.
The number of deaths has jumped by 16 in the past week and a fifth of the 300-plus people in hospital are in critical care - the highest rate since the pandemic began.
Shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley added: "This is an indication that we should not regard swine flu as always moderate in its effects. It also reinforces the case for vaccination among those people most at risk."
Doctors and nurses will refuse H1N1 vaccine en masse:
On the other hand, nothing is said about Vitamin D, a nutrient which most people are deficient in, which drives the immune system and therefore should be a no-brainer piece of advice to protect against influenza.
Setting the people up to die: a conspiracy of silence about swine flu and vitamin D
Sixty million years of evolution says vitamin D may save your life from swine flu
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
Is this Barack Obama, 2009?
Perhaps during an address since accepting the Nobel?...
...Nope. This was said by Adolf Hitler in 1942.
To Obama's ever-shrinking but ever-more-fanatic cult following...realise you are being led along by promises of peace that are as empty as Hitler's were...
You remind me of these people (see about 1 min in, and again at 5 min):
Good film, Terrorstorm, you should watch the whole thing.
The Atlantic - Does the Vaccine Matter?
More posts on vaccines:
Doctor: What you were never told about vaccines
Vaccination "a superstition" - Dr Hadwen (1923)
Vaccinating Children While They Sleep
Here's a little concept art, how do they say, "4tehlulz":
This was inspired by the CDC pro-vaccine poster, which says "Don't get the flu, Get the vaccine". And of course this TV outburst (last 20 secs of the video):
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
BBC - What Happened to Global Warming?
Okay, it should be remembered that every other piece they have written on the subject has been either ignorant of the facts regarding the holes in AGW theory...or openly attacking 'global warming deniers' as being akin to Holocaust deniers, insane, or in the pocket of Big Oil, i.e. smearing rather than informing.
Considering the fact that we allow our government to directly propagandise us through openly state-run media, and then pay for the privilege of being lied to, I don't blame BBC propagandists for being so arrogant about the global warming 'scientific consensus'.
However, it is nice to see one low-key but honest piece about something. Because it's rare.
That said, I'm not about to look up at the BBC monster like a puppy (or, for doubly analogous purposes, a sheep) looks up at its master. I know you are evil and will continue going about your daily business of brainwashing, misleading, propagandising, and downright lying, as usual.
Most people aren't fooled by you anymore. I only occasionally look at the TV news to see how the day's events are being spun by the Weaving Spiders of the mainstream media, compared to the Internet where you can hear from many more people and get the truth. It's out there, if you just look for it.
And due to the evidence presented regarding solar cycles and global tempreatures (search "The Great Global Warming Swindle"), it is my opinion that these are the chief drivers of climate on Earth.
Due to the huge conflicts of interest regarding global warming's chief public figure, Al Gore (owns a carbon credit trading company), and the fact that the IPCC scientists who supposedly represent a scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming are working for the UN (who stand to gain from the implementation of a global carbon tax paid to them), it is my opinion that manmade global warming is almost entirely fictional, and that there is an agenda behind the hype, which is to use global warming as a cover for implementing global governance, and the creation of totalitarianism.
After all, if CO2 is the enemy, we need bureaucrats policing every single human, every square mile of the planet, do we not? That is the logical solution to global warming. It's the perfect problem for us to face. Too perfect, in fact. It's a very convenient lie by elitists who just want to rule. Rule everything. To save us from the problem they created.
I do not believe in manmade global warming. I used to, largely thanks to the propaganda put forth both by the school system, and by the state media. It is no thanks to them, and entirely thanks to the internet, that I was able to examine the facts for myself and come to my own conclusion.
Monday, 12 October 2009
Linked therein is a parody site, http://www.havidol.com/, which advertises Havidol, a drug designed to treat Dysphoric Social Attention Consumption Deficit Attention Disorder (DSACDAD), a condition that is only now being understood by the latest cutting edge medical research.
Did you know...
"It may not be daily life.
It may be DSACDAD."
You won't know which, until you take this short test.
Compare the parody Havidol to the real marketing of Zoloft:
Antarctic Ice Melt Lowest Ever in Satellite Era
By the way, polar bears (and I know, it's a revolutionary thought) can swim. For hundreds of miles. Phew!
But of course we only get half of the story. Yes, Arctic ice has been decreasing, but Antarctic ice has been increasing at the same time (last 30 years).
The sky is falling...but if you give me a world government and a global carbon tax, everything will be saved!
Ya know, back in the day, some people believed you had to do a ritual to bring back the sun during a solar eclipse...now we believe we are controlling the world's temperature by switching lights on and off. It's religion, not science. Deception, not fact.
Japanese scientist: computer climate models akin to 'ancient astrology'
Now here's some real environmental concerns that go unattended to, because we waste our time with CO2:
Pesticides that mess with our gender
Genetically Modified, cancer-causing foods
Prescription drugs, like Prozac, in the water supply
Aerial spraying of chemicals, suggested as a 'solution' to global warming
Seoul Times - Chinese Eat Baby Soup For Sex
I removed the pictures because they're gross and dehumanising, I don't want to see that on my site every time I view it. But yes, as if it needs to be said, it is an inhumane practice, as if the fact that the junior was aborted in the first place wasn't bad enough.
Sunday, 11 October 2009
By 2006, Iran had started trading oil in its own exchange system, that "could threaten the supremacy of London's International Petroleum Exchange". The system would use Euros, not dollars. Three years later, media rhetoric about Iran's Weapons of Mass Destruction is definitely aiming to push the public to support a war there.
Video lays it all out.
I should note that I disapprove of the liberal usage of the buzz word 'conspiracy', especially the idea that going to war in Iraq for reasons other than 'freedom and democracy' is a 'huge conspiracy'. If so, it's the most open conspiracy ever made. Everyone knows it was about controlling the oil, at least in part. Some people even think it's good to fight for control of Iraq's oil.
Also, Americans, though the video discusses your apparent 'supremacy', I guess you'll know by now that you as individuals don't get the benefits of that supremacy, something we Brits ought to remember from our own global empire. War and empire enriches and empowers a few (elite), at the expense of the rest (ordinary people).
Or do you even know you have the biggest global empire ever constructed, with troops in 135 countries as of 2004? Rhodes would be jealous!
All empires, however, must die a death eventually. It's inevitable (though this doesn't necessarily mean the home nation collapses too). This one is threatening to drag the whole world down with it...it's a lot more dangerous to have the banksters behind the BoE, Fed etc having nuclear weapons than some Persian Mullocracy.
And the banksters really might use theirs if it looks like they're going to be unseated by the people. A nuclear 9/11, they may reason, is the only way to keep people in line. It would be blamed on "Al-Qaeda in Iran", then Iran would be invaded.
Don't think they wouldn't try it, if they thought they could get away with it.
"...what is the real goal behind this? Unfortunately, I don't think it's a good goal, I think it's internationalism and world government, and not peace at all..."
Saturday, 10 October 2009
Oh wait, we already did.
Just so you know, Iran hasn't aggressed against another nation in over 150 years. (And there is zero evidence they have the capability to build a nuclear weapon. If that statement isn't true then please demonstrate so.)
Even US Intelligence admits (2007):
G. We judge with high confidence that Iran will not be technically capable of producing and reprocessing enough plutonium for a weapon before about 2015. (source)
On the other hand, US UK and Israel...well that's different though isn't it. We were justified. One rule for us and another rule for everyone else? This kind of 'world police' supremacism has to end; it's killing our reputations and our prosperity. And our soldiers.
It's official policy to not ask Israel whether they have nukes...but it's 'common sense' to talk about attacking Iran because they might - possibly - be capable of - having the potential to - build nukes and if they do they might- possibly - despite no historical precedent - despite MAD being proven to work during the Cold War - choose to try and use those hypothetical weapons.
And on that basis you want to initiate force against a third sovereign nation in a decade? Insanity! Foolhardiness! Treachery! But that's the norm in the 'post-9/11' world. Well, this isn't the post-9/11 fantasy world, it's the real world. Kim-Jong Il doesn't use his nukes. Wanna know why? Because he knows he will be vaporised if he does. Mutually. Assured. Destruction.
It's the same principle of individual mutually assured destruction that makes an armed society a polite society. Criminals pick on disarmed people. Criminal governments invade non-nuclear nations only, for exactly the same psychological reasons. I'm not necessarily saying nuclear weapons are good any more than I'm saying guns are good; but look at what the latter does to crime and the former does to war. Prevents it.
But do you not notice how real the threat is? I know, I just don't understand, even if Iran basically has zero nuclear weapon capability, they're building a bomb. It's the truthiness, honest.
So this would be a good point to admit that fear controls us. It does. If we allow the media and the interests that own the media to trick the people into believing Iran is a 'real and present danger' (while the real danger to the people is the criminals in charge of US-UK-EU who are currently destroying our respective sovereignty and economies) then great, let's all have a good old war. Although that REALLY would be another Vietnam, maybe even WW3. Really, with a draft and everything.
Strikes on Iran? Be careful what you wish for. Pandora's Box can't be closed once opened.
You might not like it so much when the draft carts your sorry backside off to pull on a uniform and board a ship to the Persian Gulf. But I was a good conservative talk show listener! I was 'patriotic'! Can't you just draft the poor black kids like in Vietnam?
At this point I am compelled to write a short addendum to ensure I don't offend any military personnel, because that's the furthest thing away from what I wanted to do. I believe that the best way to decide whether a war is necessary or justifiable is to let the troops decide for themselves whether to commit, perhaps by vote or some such way. My admittedly caustic remarks are reserved for the chickenhawks who want to 'do something about Iran' as long as they or theirs are not in the firing line. Who 'support the troops' by constantly demanding they risk their lives in situations that do not relate to real national security. I have no military background or connections, which is one of the biggest reasons why I don't support wars of aggression; I don't believe in asking others to kill and be killed for me, no matter how 'urgent' the media tells me the situation is. Hope that makes it clear.
Dr Andrew Moulden:
"Through my extensive research and my work throughout the years, I have discovered that vaccinations are causing impaired blood flow (ischemia) to brain and body from clinically silent to death. These are strokes – across the board for all of us. I have reason to believe that all are being affected and all vaccinations ARE causing the overwhelming rise in autism, specific learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, sudden infant death, gulf war syndrome, dementia, seizure disorders, some cancers it would appear, and much much more."
"The public gets it. The chiropractors embrace it. The medical Doctors, including pediatric neurologists, are stunned by it. The pharmaceutical and organized medicine cartels – must deny it. The philosophy is “if they cannot deny the message, then they will discredit the messenger.” This is simply how the system works."
Read the full interview (it's long, but if you are at all unsure about vaccines I implore you to at least skim it):
Vactruth - What You Were Never Told About Vaccines
(via Connecting the Dots in the NWO)
Bertrand Russell advocated using vaccines as bioweapons to weaken kids physically and mentally for eugenics purposes:
"Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."
- Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, 1953 (source)
Glenn Beck's slick propaganda segment on H1N1 vaccination
Legal immunity for H1N1 vaccine makers (as in, if your relative takes the vaccine and drops dead, you can't do ANYTHING about it! NO recourse whatsoever. Sit down and take it, slave.)
It's funny that the only ones who will definitely be immune after people take the vaccine, are the manufacturers! (sigh)
More non-mainstream info on vaccines available in the film Vaccine Nation.
Friday, 9 October 2009
Ignorance is Strength...
and War is Peace.
Barack Obama has not withdrawn from Iraq. He has overseen a massive increase in troop numbers in Afghanistan. Drone bombings on Pakistan have continued. Even the much-talked-about closure of Guantanamo isn't happening. During his tenure, rhetoric against Iran has reached semi-hysteria not seen since the 2002 media campaign about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction.
This is not the indicator of a man of peace, certainly not of someone truly deserving of a "Peace Prize". This is the indicator of a hypocrite, whose followers rally against war only when their leader is out of power.
If you need proof that Obama supporters are sellouts, look no further than Cindy Sheehan - who was betrayed by leftists who had previously supported her antiwar movement. However, their tone changed following the election of a Democratic Congress in 2006, and even more so following Lord Obama's ascent to the throne in 2008.
Nothing Changed with regard to foreign policy. That's the problem.
Where is the Anti-War Movement in the Age of Obama?
Thursday, 8 October 2009
"...global warming hysteria has become a prime example of the truth versus propaganda problem. It requires courage to oppose the "established" truth, although a lot of people — including top-class scientists — see the issue of climate change entirely differently. They protest against the arrogance of those who advocate the global warming hypothesis and relate it to human activities." (source)
- The FT branded him "the EU's naughty boy who won't grow up" in a patronising elitist rant
- He is currently the only EU leader to be trying to delay/sabotage the Lisbon Treaty (more delay than sabotage, but we can wish...)
"Indeed, the same chimaera of egalitarianism, which we so resolutely rejected through the collapse of communism, is re-emerging in the world again. We aren't promoters of this idea. It has been promoted by EU politicians and states, and politicians in the U.S. unfortunately seem to be joining them vehemently." (source)
Read Klaus's speech to the United Nations from last month, which was covered by PrisonPlanet.com under the headline "Czech President Slams New World Order At UN Speech", if you're in any doubt as to whether he is on the side of good or not.
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
But since the invasion...
Poppy crop eradication could even have damaging side-effects for Afghanistan's process of stabilization and reconstruction. Director of policy research for the Senlis Council, Jorrit Kamminga, says:
...the poppy eradication campaign has been ineffective, counterproductive and could well give the Taliban the decisive advantage in their struggle for the hearts and minds of the Afghan people.
Below: Opium output in Afghanistan. NATO invaded in late 2001. Since then it seems opium production is healthier than ever, despite supposed attempts to curb production. It's hard to fight a war on drugs when your superiors are the people shipping them...
[source of image and red text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan]
In other words, the Taliban were shutting down the source of over 90% of the world's opium (therefore heroin). Another ulterior motive to go to war in that place, don't you think?
The 1996 film An Unholy Alliance explores the link between the drug trade and war (and the CIA)...
And they're growing WEED in Afghanistan too apparently. Ha!
It should be noted that I don't see any legitimate way that banning drugs helps us as a society; I suspect the banning of drugs merely serves to give the state and other criminals a monopoly on drug production and trade. I believe using police to try to stop people from producing or consuming substance X is not only immoral, but impossible, and serves as an excuse to get police used to viewing ordinary people minding their own business as the enemy.
If there's a market for drugs, someone will trade in them. I'd rather this was done in the legitimate marketplace, as opposed to the profit going to criminals and criminals in government.
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
Internet game that awards points for people spotting real crimes on CCTV is branded 'snooper's paradise'
Basically, "Internet Eyes" is the next step in the Stasification of Britain. Good civilised people will be able to access this 'game', watch real, live CCTV footage, and receive cash rewards in exchange for reporting the criminal acts of their fellow citizens. Essentially, this is training us to become little Stasi style informants.
Don't forget this story about hiring citizens to act as spies for local government
One of the big misunderstandings about Nazi Germany is that the Gestapo came and got everyone. While they may be scary on their own, they wouldn't have been nearly as efficient were it not for ordinary people who helped them, usually out of an instinct of self-preservation, or fear that they would be turned in by the other person if they didn't call the Gestapo first.
Contrary to popular belief, the Gestapo was not an omnipotent agency that had agents in every nook and cranny of German society. "V-men", as undercover Gestapo agents were known, were used to infiltrate Social Democratic and Communist opposition groups, but this was the exception, not the rule. The District Office in Nuremberg, which had the responsibility for all of northern Bavaria employed a total of 80-100 informers in the years 1943-1945. The Gestapo office in Saarbrücken had at its service 50 informers in 1939.
As historian Robert Gellately's analysis of the local offices established, the Gestapo was for the most part made up of bureaucrats and clerical workers who depended upon denunciations by ordinary Germans for their information. Indeed, the Gestapo was overwhelmed with denunciations and spent most of its time sorting out the credible from the less credible denunciations. Far from being an all-powerful agency that knew everything about what was happening in German society, the local offices were understaffed and overworked, struggling with the paper load caused by so many denunciations.
"Our state collects more data than the Stasi ever did. It's time to fight back" - says Timothy Garton Ash writing for The Guardian.
- ► 2010 (647)
- Who did WHAT to the Audit the Fed Bill?
- New Flu Stories: Best of the Worst
- Your TV Licence money at work: Pravda UK
- UKIP make the EU Parliament interesting
- Obama's Daughters get H1N1 Vaccine (Yeah Right!)
- I actually support the postal strikes
- Make Your Own Flu Vaccine!
- Doubt I'm the only Brit annoyed at this CO2 ad
- Fall of the Republic - the Presidency of Barack H ...
- Cartoon: "Yellow Cake"
- The Wizards Behind Dr Oz's H1N1 Vaccine
- Danger: Pop Culture Within (Sunderland v Liverpool...
- This is why 9/11 truth still matters
- Well, you wanted more regulation...
- Nobody's Buying It
- Muse - MK Ultra
- Obama caught reading "The Post-American World"
- Context to this HG Wells NWO quote
- GE Profits Fall - time to hit Iran?
- Associated Press are Birthers; Should you be?
- Swine Flu Jabs Start Next Week
- Remind you of the Obama Peace Prize?
- Flu Vaccines: "greatest quackery in history of mod...
- I can't believe I'm saying it, but...thank you BBC...
- No more: I removed those bloody foetus pictures
- Deflation: Good For You, Bad For The State
- You Could 'Havidol', Too
- Record Low Antarctic Ice Melt
- Chinese Eat Aborted Baby Soup
- Iraq, Iran and the Petro Dollar: History Repeats
- Ron Paul on the Nobama Peace Prize
- No Translation Required - the Iranian Threat
- Doctor: What You Were Never Told About Vaccines
- Bloodthirsty Obama gets Nobel Peace Prize
- The only real national leader on the planet is...
- Rage Against The Machine: Testify
- Fall of the Republic - trailers
- 'War On Drugs' in Afghanistan?
- Internet 'game' where people report real CCTV crim...
- Fluoride: A Professional Perspective
- Grim Reaper says "Get your flu shot!"
- House Slave Manual
- I'm from the IMF, and I'm here to help.
- O'Reilly vs Napolitano on Iran
- Lisbon: the best Yes vote money and lies can buy
- Irish vote on Lisbon today...
- More Ron Paul stuff
- ▼ Oct 2009 (47)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)