Form A Line

Just like WW1 huh? Gangs. So who is Franz Ferdinand then?

China investment in Iran worries US

"Washington is worried that Iran continues to attract investment from China despite a new round of UN Security Council sanctions imposed on Tehran, a US official says.

Chinese companies were "aggressive" in investing in Iran's oil and gas fields, Joseph Christoff, head of the Government Accountability Office's international affairs and trade department, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday.

Christoff says international and unilateral sanctions were "not changing their (the Chinese) behavior" toward Iran.

Addressing the same panel, another official said that the US will press China to abide by international sanctions on Iran.

"China is of concern to us," AFP quoted Robert Einhorn, special adviser for nonproliferation and arms control at the State Department, as saying on Thursday. "We need for them to enforce the Security Council resolution," he said.

Beijing should not "backfill" by doing business with Tehran while other countries are "distancing themselves from Iran," Einhorn said.

The US and its Western allies accuse Iran of seeking a military nuclear program. Tehran rejects the charges, stressing that as a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty it will not forgo its right to peaceful nuclear technology.

The UN Security Council adopted a US-drafted sanctions resolution on June 9. Ever since the US, European Union, Australia, and Canada have adopted unilateral sanctions against Iran.

However, China and Russia, two permanent members of the UNSC, as well as many other countries say they would not abide by the unilateral sanctions."

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=136724§ionid=351020101

Death

How would you react when confronted with it?

I had the oddest dream last night.

I was a prisoner, perhaps of war but I couldn't be sure, of what I recall to be Japanese people, in my own bedroom, remarkably. Now I was aware that all the prisoners were being killed, despite not actually seeing anyone else, except the one (strangely) Arab-ish guy who is telling me to eat what is in front of me.

On the desk is a white bowl containing a tiny worm-ish sort of thing, but with lots of legs like a millipede. It is yellow except its head which is blood red. Like some kind of twisted Bushtucker suicide pact, I'm supposed to eat this freaky thing knowing full well it's going to kill me. But I had to and so it's best to go out with a little bit of courage.

So I put down the bowl containing said creature and sit on my bed, best place for one to kick it I suppose. But there's a problem; I try to pick it up and I keep dropping it, it slips through my fingers. There are blood stains where it has fallen onto my bed. But I pick it up again and on the count of three, with this Arab guard counting to three as well (oddly I didn't see fit to just kick him in the shins and run away, I was resigned to the inevitable it seems) I eat it and chew it up and swallow it.

Now about this time I become a little more conscious and as I'm lying down my stomach seizes up and my mind races off on the subject of my imminent demise. I'm sorry to my family for leaving them behind. Think of all the things I never got to do! I'm going to meet God, whoever or whatever that is, and find out what the heck has been going on! I'd best keep in mind that I'm dying, so that when I go out through the head and through the ceiling like those people in NDEs do, I don't need it all to be explained to me that yes, I am dead!

Aaaaand awaken.

A relief, but kind of a let down in another way too.

A reminder that any day could be your last.

Returning to my Disinfo/Shills Policy

The policy is thus - everyone is a shill and disinfo from your own subjective perspective, and be grateful you don't agree with anyone on everything. It's a good sign.

(source) Whose side am I on? My side. I'm sure Messers Jones and Rense can take care of themselves just fine!

What, you want someone who is wholly independent of the System and tells you everything you need to know and is somehow not already six ft under?

After all, you say yourself, while arguing that person X is not telling the truth, that if they were right, how come they haven't been hunted down and removed by TPTB?

(Sometimes I wonder whether some of these exopolitics types are not one big cover for the leaking of classified info hidden amongst the whole "friendly tall blond ETs from the galaxy in Pegasus' arse" thing. That way most people would not believe you, but those who 'need to know' see through it.)

Most if not every anti-NWO 'celebrity' engages in lies or at least omits things. It's quite obviously part of the charade that keeps them right where they are and not onboard single engine aircraft with an inexperienced pilot trying to land in thick fog...

Alex Jones exposed?

Say what you must, I would not be writing this blog in the manner I am if not for the work of Jones. I think he's fairly genuine even if he probably is on some kind of leash. No human being could do empassioned radio four hours a day if they didn't believe at least somewhat in what they were doing. But the criticisms are mostly legit too. You need many other pieces of the puzzle which Jones does not discuss or downplays.

Nobody's going to spoon feed you the truth like here comes the choo-choo. If you want that, then need I remind you that TV news runs 24 hours a day?

Wikileaks: a threat to National Security!

"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann Goering

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” - attributed (disputedly) to Joseph Goebbels

There is no greater threat to 'national security', than truth and openness. Therefore it follows that all 'national security' is based on lies, and thus the fox is guarding the henhouse, so to speak. This is a fact that people who have succumbed to the militarist fetish fail to see.

Wiki 'Leaks' New Pentagon Papers, Reveals CIA Plans to Destroy Wikileaks

A Flag For England? (Not For Royal British Israel)

Flags are important things, you know. The joys, hopes, sufferings and character of a tribe mapped out on a rectangular piece of cloth. A symbol of a common bond you could say.

Until recently if you asked me which flag I regard as being the one representing my nation, I'd have an easy answer - the St George's cross of course.

There's just one problem with that. Have a look at the fair points made about that flag here, then get back to me.

Knights Templar. Masonic checked floor. Usury. The Bad Guys.

Now I don't completely agree with that site's statements about the English people, to me it sounds a little supremacist (and I don't use that word lightly like some pc muppets might) considering the role the English aristocracy has had in exploiting first the English people in feudalism, then the Scottish Welsh and especially the Irish people, then large parts of the world during the First Rothschild "British" Empire (the Second being the less formal but more successful Rothschild "Amerikan" Empire).

So I don't know, I'm somewhere between the assessment of the English made by that site and the assessment made by the ZGR that basically the English are children of Satan, I guess. I am not self hating. My grandfather was an ordinary coal miner but no Bevin Boy, he fought in Italy unwittingly for the evil throne of "David", against German lads also fighting - even less wittingly - for the same evil throne of "David" via a one time visitor to London and big time Crown provocateur called Adolf.

I digress. Point is, is there a flag that represents England without being a symbol of oppression towards the English people (a symbol of Norman-Vatican conquest and subsequent feudal serfdom, and immoral Crusades, and an occult Templarist symbol)?

I'm not a fan of dragon flags or any kind of symbolism like that. Those symbols - the dragon, the lion, the serpent, represent the royal bloodline families as far as eye can tell. The lion is the symbol of Judaism yet is also the symbol of the Royal British Empire, and Christians in Rome were thrown to lions, go figure. The dragon and the serpent just make you think maybe David Icke has a point, but whatever they really represent they are all over the place in royal heraldry, corporate logos etc. Exploitation again.
Besides that, there are no lions and very few serpents (unless Icke is right of course, lol) in England, just grass snakes which aren't exactly dragon-like. What the bloody hell are they doing here? The lions surely belong to Africa, and where is it the Komodo dragon is from - ah yes Indonesia, thank you wikipedia, even though you do obscure and lie about many things.

If we're talking animal symbolism, what about the wolf? Humans identify with dogs and wolves because we actually have a lot in common. Certainly humans in their natural environment (ie not the convenience corporatocracy we live in today) share a lot of behaviour with wolves, and wolves occasionally raise human children as one of their own. Wolves were an indigenous English/British animal, not that I support the nutjob anti-human 'animal rights' idea of reintroducing them into the wild over here like they are in America, of course. The British Bulldog is I suppose a reasonable animal symbol, but it just makes me think of dogfighting (and not the courageous Fighter Command kind).

The flag I currently have on this blog is an unofficial flag for Northern England. Since it malforms the evil cross of St George*, I consider it suitable. The Scandinavian cross represents the Viking connection to the North-East, and say what you want about the Vikings, they weren't that bad at all in my opinion; it was Vikings who made one successful free society - Iceland, which is one of the oft-cited examples of individualist anarchy 'working' by modern anarchists, the other of course being Ireland prior to the Crown takeover and desecration there.

I don't think you need to be a genius to figure out why I never really have been a fan of the Union Jack. Uh, can you say 'royal tyranny' and 'involuntary assimilation of the Scottish, Welsh and Irish people'?

So in short England was feudally enserfed in 1066. In truth, despite many fake revolutions and fake freedoms, we have never turfed the bastards who did it out! And to make matters worse they have now intermarried for centuries with other non-European elites and hence they want their British Israel NWO global feudalism. That's not the only paradigm to view modern events through but it is one that makes a lot of sense out of the senseless.

British Israel..."Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land". There is little to no evidence to support its assertion that Brith-ish people are a lost tribe of Israel, or indeed that Saxons are Isaac's Sons. It seems to be an ideological cover for the fact that the English elite, how should I put this, aren't completely European. Also note that in the chart above Jews, ie ordinary Jews, are only given a passing mention which reflects the reality that they have at times been treated like crap, especially if they remained in Europe and didn't go along with the Zionist gameplan to force-move them all to Palestine. Remind me, who promised Palestine to both Jews and Arabs before WW2? Now that's not going to cause any prob-oh wait...

Okay, maybe flags aren't that important. Some think we should discard them because people fight over them. I think anything that makes people willing to fight would be as much of a blessing as a curse today, but then what do I know. The most important thing is what the fight is for, truly. If I thought this nation was unrecoverable, or even the whole human species was unrecoverable, then what is the point of 'living'. It's all lies and the truth is the ordinary human being is incredibly powerful, hence the constant attempts to suppress and control by any means.

The English people don't need a flag as much as a g't big slice of humble pie (sorry but banning guns does not make us 'more civilised' you morons), perhaps a slap in the face with a wet fish, which will slap them out of their korporate kommie kontrolled stupor and maybe then we'll get round to figuring out what the hell happened and who's doing it all to us and what a bunch of crooks and cowards they are, they are terrified of us simply becoming aware of what has been done. Where's the fire coming from? Who benefits?

*of course, I don't view people who have a different opinion of the St George's cross or indeed the Union Jack, even, in a dim light. It could be that I'm wrong and we should embrace these symbols as ones that once represented our oppression but are now a badge of honour and unity - but either way the real history of the symbols must be known first. Which, quite clearly, is not the case today.

Latino Brown Beret: "Go back to Europe"

It's funny how she has light eyes which denote that she should probably send half or maybe a quarter of herself back to Europe too. That's a fair point actually - why aren't Mexicans demanding all the white or part-white people of European descent in Mexico, "go home" first? They were the Conquistadores, were they not? Hypocrisy at all?



They're not shy about it. You think they are coming to bring you a warm Diversity embrace? LMAO

Oh, because it's a foundation front movement to destabilise the southwestern US, that's why it doesn't have to be consistent. I would never have guessed...

Question - if racism is an inborn characteristic of white people, what exactly, then, is anti-racism?

And I'm sick of this racist spiel. You reach a point where the supposed fight against racism becomes a fight against reality, like all proto-Marxist ideology.

Take feminism. Okay, equal rights for people, fine, but who is going to be the one to say that maybe men and women are different and that isn't a bad thing, and a better route would be to appreciate and work with what is real rather than continue to preach the unreal, harming people in the process? There is a difference between 'equal', in terms of respect and dignity and value, which people should be, and 'the same'. That's what I'm saying.

What they call Diversity is a lie, and it isn't going to end well for all concerned. All puppets in a game you don't even know you're part of. I'll tell you this for free...most people who believe in Diversity do not practice what they preach (and for that matter have no idea what they're really preaching), and while I understand that, I don't like hypocrites.

Wind turbines and mosques. The new temples of the cultural-awareness-seminar attending leftist. But on your doorstep? "Ohhhh nooooooo not meeeeee, I didn't mean anywhere near meeeeee, anywhere else is fine as long as we elite white leftists get to stay in our homogenous compound with armed guards".

White flight. How can you flee from something unless you're being pursued? What is pursuing you? Be honest. Tell the truth. Come on, spit it out. You're a Racist running away from Diversity*, aren't you? Yes you are. You all are. Because this word was invented and manipulated by us, the social engineers, to apply to all of you and make you quiver at its very mentioning...I said quiver, now!

That's better. Serf.

*of course, all nonwhite ethnic groups to some extent look out for themselves and self segregate of their own free will (eg 'Chinatown'), presumably because they - God forbid - don't really like Diversity either; but they are not called Racist for doing so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-segregation

"Auto-segregation (self-segregation) is the separation of a religious or ethnic group from the rest of society in a state by the group iself. Through auto-segregation, the members of the separate group can establish their own services, and maintain their own traditions and customs.

For example, some world tribes have preferred to stay in reservations and not to integrate with the rest of the state's population. By remaining in a reservation or on their original lands, they can preserve their language and beliefs.

On the other hand, some supremacist groups self-segregate to avoid integrating with other groups that they consider inferior. Racists, radical Islamists, Orthodox Jews, ultranationalists and other supremacist or ethno-centric groups commonly segregate themselves from other communities through various practices like endogamy."

So what's the difference (above) between 'some world tribes' who want to 'preserve their language and beliefs', and 'supremacist groups' who want to 'avoid integrating'? NOTHING except the Newspeak. Hypocrisy is a bitch.

Moon Find May Point to Habitable Tunnels

Yeah, those are the tunnels where the aliunz who pilot the spaceship moon live :D

I'm kidding. ish

Moon find may point to habitable tunnels

US President Barack Obama may have to reconsider his decision to abandon plans to return to the Moon - it seems our closest galactic neighbour is still throwing up surprises.

Last year, NASA'a Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) dipped into a low orbit around the Moon and almost immediately returned results.

Early in May, it found lost Soviet rover Lunokhod 1, which wandered off course 40 years and stopped sending signals back to Earth.

Later that month, it sent back an amazing image of a three-storey high boulder which had rolled across the Moon's surface before toppling into a crater.

Now it may have confirmed a theory that scientists had held about the Moon since the 1960s - its surface may hide a vast network of tunnels.

Full article - http://www.news.com.au/technology/moon-find-may-point-to-habitable-tunnels/story-e6frfro0-1225893374953?from=public_rss

Have you ever asked yourself, in all the ostensibly random machinations of space-time and matter, what are the odds of that? Fits like a glove. Tailer made ;) Tee hee

How the US Army is being usurped

I think this is important, because often people say "but the soldiers are our sons, brothers etc, they wouldn't do anything to us". Well, yeah, but not all of them, huh?

'Scary' growth of gangs in war zones

Image Source - Gangs of Iraq

Also - this is perhaps the beginning of a future trend in military recruitment - American-based PMCs and to a lesser extent the US Army are recruiting non-US citizens and even people who have never set foot on American soil, offering US citizenship in return for doing tours in Iraq/Afghan/whereverthebankstersbombnext.

I am not aware of the British Army getting up to these kind of tricks - yet - and generally, as far as I am aware, foreigners in Britain are unlikely to join the military, especially Muslims obviously (and why should they want to oppress their relatives?). The economic crisis has eased the difficulty of military recruitment sadly (plenty of people still willing to fight for Rothschild) , not that I disrespect soldiers, because I don't, but the utter waste and exploitation of soldiers...sickening. But then, when was it not?

Anyway I would have little doubt that most British or American soldiers would disobey any order to subjugate their own people (even if it is imposed incrementally, which it obviously will be). But bring in people who have no loyalty, or even in some cases hate the citizens of the country whose government they are serving, and then you've got a different scenario. Gangbangers earning their stripes? Welcome to the 21st century, when the state starts to reveal itself as the gang it is.

Davy Rockefeller's Vision of the Future

You can figure out which of the four scenarios he really wants. NWO Lockdown.

PDF

Also note that his foundation, like many other criminal groups in America, was founded in 1913 - the year America fell to the British Israel Aristocracy.

BTW when they say "weak political alignment", they mean Freedom.

State Eugenics is back, who do we forcibly sterilise first?

I would have said that the suggestion to sterilise the poor was just a rare exception, but recalling previous opinions of Guardian and Daily Mail readers, I have no doubt that this opinion is widely held among more self righteous members of the herd.

Of course, it would never be you, would it? It's always be them, over there, the rabble, the scum, who would be on the receiving end. Elitist bastards. Marxists might belong to the most murderous non-religious cult in history, but they do have a point about class war.

I know that many ordinary supporters of the cradle to grave state have damn good intentions, but whatever the truth about the morality and pragmatism of this system, heck I'm not sure about that myself, the real eugenicists (whose aim is dumbing people down, not building them up) have benefited tremendously from it. Yet it's funny, all those breeders on benefits, and we still can't acheive replacement fertility?

That is the real eugenics, and all you self righteous presumably middle class types who wouldn't mind sterilising the unworthy peasantry, you are yourselves victims of it. Eat up! Every mouthful you take from your BPA lined plastic containers and cans makes you a little more infertile. Who's laughing now? Well it's certainly not your children 'cause you won't be having any. Not so funny! Malthus finds it Hitlerious though. It's for the Earth, you understand. Hurry up and die so you stop consuming things you don't really need, like oxygen.

Eugenics is the product of people who have lost respect for human life and do not see themselves as being interconnected with the rest of humanity. Soulless creatures. Not atheists, just negative eugenicists.

PS: I don't use the term 'eugenicist' as a pejorative because really everyone is a eugenicist in practice - partner selection is a blatantly eugenic process. So I specify state eugenics, i.e. forcing people to comply with eugenic processes, and I emphasise both conventional negative eugenics (the sterilisation or worse of 'unfit' individuals) and what I describe as 'real eugenics' (the actual aim of most social engineers, which is to REDUCE the health and intellect of a society, not INCREASE it like the naive popular conception of eugenics says), as being the evil eugenics that we rightly consider to be nefarious. Why would tyrants want to kill off the 'weak'? No, they want to kill off anyone who might resist them. That's what the Commies did. That's what the school system's real purpose is.

Lyndon LaRouche Theatre (1986)

What is it they say about the best comedy being close to the truth?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7786609813647356541

Ugh, the common people!

Inflation.us video: Empty Store Shelves Coming?

I have a few things to say about this video.



First of all, I'm not a fan of the gold and silver brokers running sites that, even if they do tell the truth, are clearly pushing feeeeeeeeaaaarrr to sell their products.

Secondly you cannot eat gold or silver so it will not be much use in a real crisis (as a store of wealth superior to government funny money, oh yes, but during food shortages? No)

Thirdly, criticisms aside, take a look at how fragile our convenience society is when even the slightest thing goes wrong. Now hardened criminals, that's one thing. But many many 'law abiding' people (the ones who never saw it coming, I mean) will be ready to kill if the convenience society falls apart, you can be sure of that. They are just as dangerous as the regular criminal population in a crisis.

I don't think it needs to be said, but this video definitely does not only apply to America. It's the entire world coughing up blood (all the money has already been coughed up, it's gone to the bailed-out banking families). The economic reckoning can only be stopped by dethroning (sometimes literally) the financial elite and their debt slavery system; easier said than done.

Empty shelves in Zimbabwe, an extreme example of hyperinflation/price controls due to the crooks running the central bank printing money for themselves...sounds familiar eh? (OK that isn't the sole cause of food shortages in Zim, there's also the disenfranchising of the farmers who just happened to be crackas, I admit, but still)

War Is A Ritual, or Don't Bomb My Tax Haven Please

First let us take a look at the largely static trench systems of WW1. Here's a map of where the rabble obediently fought over land not big enough to bury the dead.

Notice anything unusual?

The machine gun/infantry predicament made it inevitable that the stalemate would ensue from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. Except one place where an invisible force field (kidding...or am I?) prevents the trenches from expanding into.

And don't buy their explanation that the Swiss were 'neutral'. Belgium was neutral, but the Germans marched right over them regardless in an attempt to outflank the French. So some are more neutral than others, hmm?

And again in WW2. When our chaps were taken POW, where did they run to? Home? That's a lot more difficult than running to der Schweitz, again neutral, and being flown home from this 'neutral' country!

If you were commanding ze Germans in WW2, and unlike Hitler you actually were trying to win, you surely would annex Switzerland immediately and cancel out its neutral status. It would be easy and it would solve a lot of problems, including the easy escape for POWs.

So what do we make of this situation? Two world human sacrifices, and this little neutral country - despite both times offering a strategic advantage to those who would violate its neutrality - remains unscathed (while others like Belgium and Holland are not so lucky).

Magick? Bank accounts?

Bank accounts.

But whose? Be Eye Ssss

"The BIS is also a frequent target of allegations by conspiracy theorists, many of whom portray it as a front organization through which a wealthy elite controls the world. Some argue that the bank has not helped matters through a culture of secretiveness"

Before any misunderstanding is made, I like Switzerland, especially their neutrality and their militia. But it must be understood that the finance oligarchs have done everything to undermine the neutrality and sovereignty of other nations; they only let places like der Schweitz exist because it suits them. Free trade + bailouts for the banksters, green economy adventure for us. Simple equation.

Did I mention that the Square Mile of London is a tax haven? Yet, it's such a 'good', 'sneaky' tax haven, it somehow does not appear on most lists of tax havens. (Take a look for yourself here)

"London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more "usual suspect” jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute."

Square Mile too secretive, says report

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the slaves
Britons never never never shall make waves
?

Hopi Prophecies and the Gulf Oil Disaster

Here's a different tangent for you to go off on today. Quite a set of coincidences, hmm?

Hopi Prophecies: (signs of the end of this Age)

Quote,

1. "This is the First Sign: We are told of the coming of the white-skinned men, like Pahana, but not living like Pahana men who took the land that was not theirs. And men who struck their enemies with thunder.

2. "This is the Second Sign: Our lands will see the coming of spinning wheels filled with voices. In his youth, my father saw this prophecy come true with his eyes -- the white men bringing their families in wagons across the prairies."

3. "This is the Third Sign: A strange beast like a buffalo but with great long horns, will overrun the land in large numbers. These White Feather saw with his eyes -- the coming of the white men's cattle."

4. "This is the Fourth Sign: The land will be crossed by snakes of iron."

5. "This is the Fifth Sign: The land shall be criss-crossed by a giant spider's web."

6. "This is the Sixth sign: The land shall be criss-crossed with rivers of stone that make pictures in the sun."

7. "This is the Seventh Sign: You will hear of the sea turning black, and many living things dying because of it."

8. "This is the Eight Sign: You will see many youth, who wear their hair long like my people, come and join the tribal nations, to learn their ways and wisdom.

9. "And this is the Ninth and Last Sign: You will hear of a dwelling-place in the heavens, above the earth, that shall fall with a great crash. It will appear as a blue star. Very soon after this, the ceremonies of my people will cease.

Source http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=11546

Elizardbeth II, Queen of the NWO, Ruler of the UN

Oh yeah, you think the bluebloods gave up all their power to 'democracy' do you? Bloodlines - either you have 'em or you don't. Sit on the throne or clean the throne...

Hail Caesar! Queen Gives Marching Orders To The UN
Rense.com

Regarding the queens speech to the United Nations, we were told by the British Mission to the United Nations that the queen "Will be taking a global perspective. She will touch on progress made since she was last here and challenges that remain."

For a woman who says she is not head of any country-only titular head of state of 16 countries including Australia, Canada and New Zealand and the nominal representative of 54 governments in the British Commonwealth, who is fooling who? Why should be the people of the world listen to a little old lady from Britain? The answer is because her hereditary demands it.

The visit by the queen, which was billed as low key-a five hour visit-was designed to get the global agenda of sustainable development and climate control back on track and to make a statement. Nothing the queen does is low key as every visit, and every word has a meaning and a goal for total control.

First let's take a look at the queen herself. According to Who Owns the World by Kevin Cahill, the queen is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land that equals one sixth of the earth's non-ocean surface. She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries and who owns countries that re not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies-like Norway, Belgium, and Denmark, where no such claim is made. The value of her holdings is approximately $33T, more than the estimated value of all of the earth's natural resources which is estimated to be $25T.

Secondly, the physical structure of the United Nations and its agenda represents the completion of the dream and aspirations of British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes to return the United States and the rest of the world back under British rule. He felt that "too little of the globe was British territoryand if we had retained Americathere would be millions more of English living."

In Rhode's 1877 will, it says

"the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British
Empire, the consolidation of the whole Empire, the inauguration of a system of colonial
Representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed
Members of the Empire," which may well ultimately be achieved, by the Roundtable which
"publicized the idea of and the name 'British Commonwealth of Nations.'"

The executors of Rhodes' six wills had concerns and fears about what kind of structure all of this should take. According to Dr. Carroll Quigley in his The Anglo-American Establishment published in 1981, they concluded that they would have to transform the British Empire into "a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League of Nations." The United Nations is the successor to the League of Nations and the Commonwealth is inside the U.N. In other words, we are there. The representatives to the UN should have greeted her, "Hail Caesar"!

Full Article

The general British indifference to the monarchy is because they are perceived to be nothing more than a relic or an antique, a tourist attraction that brings in more money from gullible foreigners - primarily Stockholm Syndrome royal loving Americans (I remember that from years ago when I visited Queenie's house in London, long before all this info reached me, all the American tourists who seemed to love the royalty surprised me) - than they cost us to pay for their luxury.

If it was even suspected by the average serf in the street that the royals had actual power, things might be very different.

Sooooo...hello! They do have real power! If looked upon from another angle, one might suspect them of being the highest leaders of the NWO...is Rothschild himself a Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sock puppet? Or to get higher than that are we going out of the human realm, oh boy you better believe that...

A Little Exercise in Word Switching - Das Racist?

I don't know what your opinions are on what constitutes 'racism' to you, if you believe something is acceptable or not. But surely we can all agree that what is good for the goose, is good for the gander? Political correctness, much as I dislike it in many ways, at least claims to be all about the much-treasured ideal of equality, does it not?

So without further ado...(the discerning reader should spot within seconds which words I have switched and guess which words have been replaced!)

Teens tackle hot topic of dating
um...Stormfront?, 1 July 2010

Do Portland’s White teenagers think it’s racist to date only other Whites? What about their views on the Bernie Madoff scandal, or thoughts on the approaching 2012 Mayan doomsday?

These are some of the topics that are fodder for conversation at Hot Pizza and Hot Topics, sponsored by Kesser Pan-Europa and led by Bishop Kenneth Brodkin.

At the last Hot Topics session before breaking for the summer, 17 teenagers—10 girls and seven boys from Kesser, Polen, Wieles and more—gathered around pizza from The Café at the J to talk about interfaith marriage and dating.

“It’s certainly very applicable to my life,” laughs Minna O’Brien, 17, a PCC student who is transferring this fall to OSU to study mechanical engineering. “Just from a practical standpoint, in dating Whites, the pool gets kind of small, you know?”

Ben Smith, 15, says he dates non-Whites, but will only marry another White.

“I want my kids to be raised White,” says the Catlin Gabel student, whose older brother is engaged to a convert to Christianity. “But dating at my age, I’m like, non-Whites, it’s fine.”

The evening’s discussion starts with a question of whether Christianity is a race or a culture. The teenagers also engage with the bishop about the definition of race and common human ancestry, Christian views of marriage, and what the Bible says about interfaith dating and marriage.

“Marriage is a personal lifestyle choice,” protests one young man. “It’s not racism.”

O’Brien chimes in that dating only Whites is “no more racist than only dating Republicans.”

While one boy says that teenaged dating is an opportunity to find out what you like and what you don’t like in relationships to help inform more serious choices down the road, another cautioned that dating non-Whites early in life might be a slippery slope toward marrying outside Christendom as an adult.

“The more you can share with your spouse is a deep and wonderful thing,” says Bishop Brodkin, noting that same-faith marriage is good not only for Christians but for people of other religions as well. “Being in a marriage that’s not working is a tremendous source of misery.”

If Christianity is just a culture, the bishop argues, then interfaith marriage and dating gets a little confusing. People from different cultures—e.g., Turkish and Iranian—marry and raise families together all the time.

“The best that you can kind of hope for is that they understand that they don’t understand,” O’Brien says of her experience dating non-Whites. “Kind of a respectful confusion.”

But beggars can’t be choosers, she adds. “It would certainly be easier to date Whites. There aren’t a lot of White guys, and there aren’t a lot of White guys asking, compared to the number of non-White guys who are.”

“We strongly encourage young people to date and to marry White. Their greatest chance at a long-term meaningful Christian life and White identity for them and their children clearly comes through a marriage and a home which is shared with someone with similar values,” Brodkin says. “We feel that their long-term success is going to be greatly, greatly enhanced by marrying someone White.”

Brodkin says the point of these discussions is to help young people think independently as they grapple with some of life’s most important questions and decisions.

“As a church, what we want to do is try to not tell them what to do, but to be there as they’re making these decisions, and to be able to help them realize how much potential they have, and how much Christianity can enrich the decisions that they’re making,” says Brodkin. “The gift of being young is that you have the power to effect the rest of your lives.”

Full and Original Article - yeah it's not really some white group. LMAO. Can you imagine that. The mainstream and the white antifas would lynch them! (I couldn't resist, sorry)

As usual, I just note the hypocrisy. Nothing more. I actually don't have a problem with this kind of group, it's their right to direct their own lives how they see fit, but the double standards are there for all who care to see them. I also like these kind of topics because by writing about them I am poking at perhaps the deepest levels of the reader's Corporate-Communist state-school/MSM programming. I admit it's fun. But also necessary.

David Icke and Alex Jones 8/July/10

Say what you must about either or both of them, there are legitimate criticisms to be made, and they should be made, but the truth is the sheer reach these individuals have outweighs any flaws in what they say or don't say.

Note - They bring up Albert Pike's Three World Wars letter in the last part. Very timely, I hope not.



Part 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5

May the rabble rousing continue. Surface!

On "Supporting the Troops" - Lions led by Etonite Mosquitoes

When public support for a war is floundering, here comes the usual government tactic - shielding themselves with the very young volunteers who they send to war.

Just wondering, rhetorically of course - has the Etonian call me Dave ever been shot at? I mean, I haven't, but then it's not me who assumes the official responsibility of ordering other people into harm's way. Lead by example with your slingshot, King David of British Israel! Can you imagine that?!

Cameron calls on national support for troops
TMN News

Next Saturday is Armed Forces Day, when celebrations will be held around the country with the main event being held in Cardiff. Prime Minister Cameron is calling for the country to show its “social responsibility” and give its thanks.

Fresh from his trip to Afghanistan, the Prime Minister said, “These people know all about duty – they’ve lived it. Now we as a country must do our duty by them. Over the past few years there’s been an increasing appreciation of what our Armed Forces do. But still I believe that we should do more.”

He continued, “But supporting our Armed Forces isn’t just a government responsibility – it’s a social responsibility.”

“In the First World War those at home didn’t just sing, ‘Keep the home fires burning’, they practised it.”

“In the Second World War, the military occupied a huge place in the national consciousness, partly because everyone knew someone in uniform.”

“I believe as a country at war we should see the same appreciation today, with the military front and centre of our national life once again.”

Full Article

Etonites (Parasites) - call me Dave is no.2, and of course mad hatter Boris Johnston is no.8.

See, there are many many problems with this simplistic outlook, and nothing disappoints me more than seeing the physical and mental waste of some of the best people in society while other non-enlisted braindead zombies walk around parroting "support the troops".

"If we don't fight them over there, they'll fight us over here" (who? Afghan tribesmen? Or Al-CIAda?)

"They're bringing freedom" (yeah like Karzai the puppet dictator, the coalition-protected poppy trade, and a million dead in Iraq, free dumb indeed)

"They have to finish their mission now they've been there so long" (do they have a mission, first, and second this exact same person would have said before the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq that no-one could predict how it would turn out so we should all shut up and trust the government. Hypocrites!)

And the best one, my personal favourite, full marks for demogogy, hands up if you recognise this one:

"If we leave now then the Islamists will win" (no words can describe...)

This is a classic PR nonsense. Like all the Israel lobbyists always use the term "Hamas" and never use the term "Palestinians" unless they are saying "Palestinians are oppressed by Hamas" (which they are btw, there's a morsel of truth) or "Palestinians don't exist". As in, "we're conducting military operations against Hamas". Liars.

We have done the same! There are no "Iraqis" or "Afghans", well there are but those are the slavish civilians who submit to their colonial occupiers. All those who resist US-British-Israel occupation are of course terrorists, insurgents, Islamists, radicals - no not Iraqi Army veterans with families taking up arms because their country has been bombed, starved and invaded over a decade and a half by UN sanctions, US air power and then coalition tanks, oh no. After all that he picks up a rifle and dares to shoot at his oppressors? Terrorist! Why is he so full of hatred for our free dumb, hmm?

(a thousand words come to mind?)

This is the problem with simply 'supporting the troops' when the orders the troops receive are downright evil. There is nothing that can excuse the sanctions enforced on Iraq which killed half a million children, it is genocide. (although if we believe Madeleine Allbright, it was "worth it"!)

Would I have supported the troops in Nazi Germany or Bolshevik Russia, or what about North Vietnam or North Korea during those artificial UN-caused intra-national wars? Would you?

I would have.

Let me explain.

I have always appreciated and valued the courage and self-sacrifice of the soldier. Yes most are and always have been good people. They're just boys, many younger than myself. You think the average German or Russian in WW2 was concerned by anything more than his own people and his own survival? And his perceived duty to his nation based on the particular line he had received from his national media. And so did British and American troops obediently subjugate Iraq. Brave? Yes. Courageous? Yes. Used? YOU BETCHA.

So where does one stand when the orders troops receive are downright evil, but again despite everything, despite the satanic military hierachy, the majority of them are decent people who essentially, unwittingly, are bodyguards for the most evil people on the planet?

Is not the best form of supporting the troops, in this case, telling them how they are being manipulated? Even if the truth hurts (and it bloody does)?

Trust me, the Islamists aren't going to 'win' (they can't win, just like Hitler could never win no matter how hard he didn't try), because they are a contrived enemy, a bogeyman created to control the masses and reach a predetermined outcome.

If you want to defeat Islamic terrorism, shut down MI6, CIA, the ISI and Mossad. Who knows, you may just find some odd things about who is producing these 'lone nuts' who are just 'radicalised' and are 'waging war on us'.

If you're concerned about Islamification at home, which compared to bigger things (like the prospect of genuine poverty) I'm not that much really but I understand, then bring the troops home, and use them to stop mosque building. LMAO!

Seriously though. All those single-issue Islam-hating sites, because they are Zionist-war-lobby run or Zionist-war-lobby sympathisers, ignore this truth. How can we criticise the Islamification of Europe, when we are in the process of forcibly subjugating several Muslim countries? At the moment we have no credibility.

I would support the troops 100% if they just stuck a big fat middle finger up at these arsehole Oxbridge Tavistock psychopaths, upped sticks and came home of their own accord. Yes, then we'd see who really supports the troops and who is just a chickenhawk traitor.

How The Venetian System Was Transplanted Into England

As a follow-up to the WG Tarpley discussion of Venice I linked the other day, here's his take on the money magickians moving from Venice to London.

"The oligarchical system of Great Britain is not an autochthonous product of English or British history. It represents rather the tradition of the Babylonians, Romans, Byzantines, and Venetians which has been transplanted into the British Isles through a series of upheavals. The status of Britain as the nation foutué of modern history is due in particular to the sixteenth and seventeenth century metastasis into England and Scotland of the Venetian oligarchy along with its philosophy, political forms, family fortunes, and imperial geopolitics. The victory of the Venetian party in England between 1509 and 1715 built in turn upon a pre-existing foundation of Byzantine and Venetian influence..."

http://www.abjpress.com/tarpb1.html

WTF? Jewish Actors Posing As Muslim Al-Qaeda

By way of deception...

"grr I'm a Muslim and I want to kill you all! No really, I'm a Muslim, with like a turban and a big knife and everything!"

Is that Yousef Al-Khattab, or Joseph Cohen? Trick question - Yousef Al-Khattab is Joseph Cohen. lmao



Gordon Duff - Why young Jews are joining Al-Qaeda

Immigration Gumballs

Just happened on this today. An excellent explanation of why mass immigration is not a 'humanitarian' policy.



This reminded me of: NHS 'taking away Africa's medics'

KDL (Kosher Defence League) fly Israeli flag and sing "God Save The Queen"

You see, I really try to like the EDL. I am against Islamification too, but c'mon chaps, the Israeli flag? I know it is your way of pissing off the Muzzies, but thanks for telling us who benefits most from your movement.

I'll put it this way: say what you want about them, at least Muzzies stab you in the front.



As I said, it's one thing to point out the incoming mortars. Anyone can do that. But if you don't know there is a mortar crew firing, and who they are and where they are, how can you hope to cease the bombardment?

The Roots of English Hatred Examined

It would not be fair for me to pass comment on the sociology of racial supremacist Zionism, without also subjecting my own nation and people to the same scrutiny. That would just be hypocritical.

Among many things I have found recently is that popular (read: dumb) English hostility towards three nations in particular - France, Germany and the United States - is not only based on rewritten history, but the self same one-sided view of things that plagues the standard issue innocent-victim rhetoric of Zionists, who on the one hand point to past ethnic cleansing, while simultaneously building their nation through further ethnic cleansing.

Popular English conceptions of the Germans as the evil 'old enemy' are just ludicrous. You want some real history? Fine. Britain and France had huge colonial empires and despite (or because of?) constantly fighting each other their aristocrats were fat and happy. Then Germany tries to enter the fold towards the late 1800s, and wants to become a colonial power all of its own. Well, we jolly well can't stand for that! So the London-based financial criminals engineer not one world war but two, such was the force required to bring down Germany. That does not make the Nahzees good guys, it makes them Anglo-Masonic puppets and useful idiots. Look again at how the oligarchs operate: create a puppet enemy then destroy them. (I'm thinking Ahmadinejad right now btw. I wonder how independent he is? Not sure. Saddam was an open US puppet, a good buddy of Donald Rumsfeld.)

But nonetheless, viewed through this paradigm, the two world wars left nearly a hundred million dead and Germany broken both physically and mentally, carved into two, with half going to the Rothschild Commies and the other going to the now Rothschild-London-Fed controlled America. Oh, and they got the state of Israel, the United Nations, and a general embracement of socialism as the New Order of peace and enlightenment and other nonsense. V for Victory, eh Churchill you satanic pro-NWO Zionist butcher of brave Tommies?

So I ask you again - were ze Germans, on balance, the biggest bad guys? And can we, as Englanders, call them the evil ones when the finance oligarchs are based right here and we (know little of it and) do nothing about it for centuries?

(Just who is this? Seriously? God Save us, never mind her!!!)

Note: I do not personally believe Queen Elizardbeth and the Royalty are quite as central to all this as some may do; I mean it isn't they themselves who are running the financial ponziconomy any more than the Pope and the Vatican are or the Jesuits are...we can debate the nature of occult power and who really wields it all day long, but nonetheless the 'Crown' - a corporate entity which I am not convinced is under the control of the monarch - is indeed the centre of global financemagick.

As for the Americans, bah I'll have to do a seperate commentary on Anti-Americanism and the NWO because that's not just an English phenomenon. It's not that it is entirely without justification, but suffice it to say that one should remove the plank from one's own eye before noticing the speck in the eye of a neighbour. Hypocrisy stinks, either way.

It's worth noting that what has happened to England, if we are focusing specifically on England (not all Britain) for consistency purposes, is that pride has come before a fall. The mighty Empire has crumbled out of existence. Ah yes, we were the 'greatest nation in the world' (where do we hear that line being said today?) and it's quite a hit to the national ego to have Illuminist bankers build you up only to destroy you once you have served their purpose, leaving a national identity crisis and simmering resentment in its place. The Germans 1870-1919 knew exactly what I'm talking about. Are you listening, Americans? You're next on their list, unless by some miracle you turf them out ASAP by ending the Fed.

As for us, the English have strengths and weaknesses like any people. I believe our strength is a general preoccupation with 'fair play'. As a nation we are good at forming polite orderly lines, that is definitely a very English trait. We also do have a strong but often naive sense of justice; sadly few can believe what treachery has gone on in their midst - and our biggest weakness, trust in the proverbial benevolent dictator (as long as we are treated well of course), allows the feudal masters to remain in power. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you, etc.

How much longer, England. Our enemies are not Garlic munchers or ze Germans or Yanks, or for that matter the immigrinvading Muzzies, but finance oligarchs who in no small part are descended from the first lords who instituted feudal serfdom here in 1066 and, truth be told, have never fully been removed from power.

The more I look at this, it seems clear we need to 'finish the job' our ancestors started and fully dismantle the British Israel Aristocracy, that means no more Lordships, no more usury or fractional reserve legalised fraud, no more Royalty, no more Palaces, no more foreign aid including to the criminal regimes of Israel and Burma, no more floating pirate ship tax haven Corporation of London, no more Bank of England and no more debt-based Funny Money. (And somehow to do all that without having a new tyranny eg a very possible Commie one rising in its place. Perhaps democracy isn't so bad after all in that regard.)

The world would thank us for such an action. Only such real 'change' will bring this mess to an end.

Goose stepping to tease ze Germans, and reciting (admittedly funny) sitcom lines, isn't going to help...

The Anatomy of a Psychosis

"What you hate, you become."



Eli Roth on Inglourious Basterds: "[it's] kosher porn. It's something I dreamed since I was a kid."



"The Star of David became an official symbol for Judaism in 1897. The Zionist movement adopted it as an emblem, but the symbol was controversial for many years after."

The Israeli flag consists of a Star of David, which is a relatively recent official symbol of Judaism but is also known as a Hexagram (like a Pentagram), as in 'hexing' people in witchcraft. (maybe anti-Zionist Jews have a point when they say Zionism is an abuse of the Jewish religion, hmm)

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/sixpointedstar.html

Since I have mentioned Masons and Hexagrams, here's MASON in a six-pointed star on the reverse seal of the USA

The star, ostensibly representing the Chosen People, is between two blue bars representing the Nile (i.e. Egypt) and the Euphrates (i.e. Iraq) - the Greater Israel said to have been promised to the Chosen People by God Himself. Various pseudomaps of this exist. It is worth noting that Israel invaded Egypt all the way to the Nile from the Six Day War until the Yom Kippur war in 1973, but I presume they simply decided they didn't have enough people in their country to hold all that land. One step at a time, eh?

Oh, and the term "Nazi" has now been expanded to include all Goyim (gives a whole new dimension to the idea of "killin' Nat-sees" doesn't it?):



Have a little empathy though. Suppose you were born a Jew and told from day one that you have been persecuted throughout history and that basically everyone wants you dead...despite that being utterly fallacious and wrong in many ways (are not Jews perhaps the most successful ethnic group in history?)...how would that affect you?

That does not make the psychosis right, it merely goes some way towards explaining it.

The Fourth of July

Why should it concern me? After all, I'm not even American. My country is supposed to be the enemy of the Colonist uprising, right? In fact, 1776 is an embarrassing moment of British Israel Aristocratic history which has almost entirely been scrubbed from the consciousness of this nation (certainly from the school system at least). We'd prefer to talk about Waterloo or the Spanish Armada, honestly.

But what did American Independence really represent?

(Here's that big phekking flag Incoming wanted. lol)

Well for a while, specifically an intermittent period of just over a century overall, those United States were largely free from the international bloodline banker tyranny, who in recent centuries have been headquartered in London. America ceased to be a free and independent nation in 1913 and now behaves more like old British Imperialists than anything else.

Which should be no surprise because it was the British Israel Aristocracy who was behind the Federal Reserve takeover anyway...

Do not make the mistake of thinking the American revolution benefited only America, or that it was just about a general "independence". Did not feudal and industrial serfs in other nations point to the success of the 13 colonies, and realise that true freedom was possible? Was not the French revolution, tragic co-opted failure that it was, based on the American one? This is why Communism was created, by the way, as a diversion to allow the usourious basterds to steer any popular uprising in their favour. Hence Rothschild Russia 1917 and everything that flowed from it.

But nonetheless the American revolution was a genuine step forward for "liberty and justice for all" worldwide; this is undeniable. One must remember that the key to what made this revolution a success was not simply rejecting 'taxation without representation', or having 'independence' in itself, but kicking out the banking cartel. That cannot be emphasised enough. Really that's all we need to do to solve most of our problems today (easier said than done), and you may well notice that many of the 'usurpations' listed below are eerily familiar to recent modern events.


___________________________________________________________________

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
___________________________________________________________________

"When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe."

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

- both, Thomas Jefferson

"If someone says to me that America is evil, I would respond that today's "America" is not the America that was a spearhead of liberty back in the 18th and 19th centuries. It has been seized by European-based Banksters, who took it over in 1913 with their "Federal" Reserve racket, and have been slowly bringing about the destruction of America ever since, by getting it into huge sums of debt." - me, 4th July 2009

50 Random Facts That Make You Wonder What In The World Has Happened To America

G20: Black Bloc Morons Given Green Light to Rampage

They broke windows and burned police cars. But no police stopped them from doing so?



(However, police were keen to push around the peaceful demonstrators afterwards, presumably invoking the violence as justification)

So as the evidence shows, police are again allowing and/or inciting small incidents of violence in order to give themselves a seemingly valid reason to 'get tough' with all demonstrators.

"Police, can we riot now?"
"Yeah, we'll just look the other way for the next hour. Mind if some of us join you?"

Just like during the height of the 90s Militia Movement in the US...when, conveniently, 'militiaman' Timothy McVeigh carried out the Oklahoma City Bombing - all by himself, of course - instantly discrediting that movement.

Gordon Duff: Broken Arrow, The Most Dangerous Weapons Of All

The hunt for missing nukes and those that covered it up.

Here

It's quite a read. Take it or leave it.

Who is that guy really? Are we supposed to believe that nuclear proliferation is basically down to one lone nut? Yeah, another 'lone nut' like Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden. lmao. These lone nuts pick the right things to be 'lone' and 'nutty' about don't they?

Lest we forget the global HQ is London btw and has been for centuries now (since the Merchants of Venice waned?). With the Noo Yoik-Tel Aviv mafia right behind them.