(Images: Yeah, white people with cigars. Mostly old white people. Damn those Whiteys. That's not racist.)Where is this white run society? I haven't been told about this. Apparently Western society is run by whites, for whites, with the aim of sticking the boot in to all 'minorities' - forever. You're telling me that society is run exclusively for my benefit and I haven't been taking advantage of it? I am white after all. Do I run things? Do I get special privileges? It'd be great if I do, please, any opressed 'minorities' who know how these white advantages work, I'd love to know about them, here I thought I was merely an ordinary citizen (or should that be subject in these times).
Okay, so society is in the hands of a few wealthy and powerful men. True. Also, most of them are indeed white, Saudi oligarchs excluded. The global elite are also incredibly racist, I'd definitely say that, just look at their "charitable policies" of abortion and vaccination eugenics in Africa.
That said, do you really think that white people are going to get some kind of special privileges under the NWO? Nope, the world population, should these nutjobs get what they want, will be under 500 million, probably under 300 million. Room for all white people in that number? No. What about the white people living in tents because the economy, built on a house of cards, is collapsing, and our paper currency will be reduced to toilet paper? Nothing for them either.
In fact, when addressing the typical obsessive 'anti-racist' mindset, it becomes necessary to tackle a whole web of interlocking ideas about who runs society. Apparently, the world is run by WASP capitalists, who cling to guns and religion. According to the typical self-described 'progressive', this is our enemy.
It's a dangerous delusion, not least because attempts to 'rectify' the 'problem' actually help the REAL elite.
Those white people giving themselves jobs. We need affirmitive action/"positive discrimination" policies.
Those religious people and their delusions about the value of life. We need to expand "a woman's right to choose" and "the right to die".
Those other religious people and their bigotry towards homosexuals. We need not only to legalise gay marriage, we need to let gay couples adopt and raise children, and encourage the normalisation of homosexuality in culture.
Those capitalists are so selfish and they're harming the environment. We need socialist wealth redistributive policies, and we need government to tax everything heavily that "harms the environment".
Those gun nuts are crazy, and their obsession with these deadly weapons, as well as the support from the evil capitalist big gun companies and lobbies, is putting the public in danger. Look at what the gun culture has done to 'minorities', we need to ban them all. Only the state, a subsidiary of the good anti-racist UN, can own guns.
Nationalism is a code word for racism (in America, States' Rights is also code, for the right to enslave minorities). Therefore we need to support good anti-racist, anti-nationalist, internationalist/federalist big centralisations of power, like the UN and the EU.
Of course, the irony is that many so-called 'progressives' ARE the racist eugenicists they supposedly hate. They support population control to 'deal with global warming'. They have a seething hatred for white people, Christianity and nationalism (a word so often misunderstood).
I could go into more detail refuting each point of the so-called 'progressive' agenda and how it ties in with the New World Order (yes, the small number of mostly white men who really run things) and their aims. But I think this is a sufficient introduction to understanding the (warped) left wing wannabe "anti-fascist", "anti-racist" mindset, which is actually heavily racist and fascist in nature. All in the name of oxymoronic "equality".
Posts
.jpg)
5 comments:
I have always found it strange that one could be derogatory towards those who are either white,male, or Christian. But to do so to any minority is racist,while the former is not.
That the media calls either an observation or funny.
Me,I call it racist no matter which way you slice it.
That's it exactly. These people think "defeating racism" means, for example, employing a proportionate number of black people to white people. That in itself is extremely racist - judging people not by the content of their character, to paraphrase MLK, but by the colour of their skin.
Ayn Rand once said that the individual is the smallest minority in the world; he that is not for the individual's rights is not for minority rights.
I've verbally wrestled segregationists before, who try (erroneously) to use the Bible to promote their "social hygiene", though they wound thinking I was black.
Who cares if you have darker or lighter or frecklier skin?
Good post, Adam!
BTW, as if I needed any more confirmation that you're British, putting a "u" in the word "color" did it for me.
LOL! :p
Somebody coloured the centre of my crisps!
Are you pissed, or did you not learn anything in primary school?
;)
Somebody colored the center of my potato chips!
Are you drunk, or did you not learn anything in elementary school?You Americans invading the world with your common-sense spelling rules and such...
:P
Well, to be precise, when speaking of gold prospecting, one must say, "Culuh".
I.e: "Keep the sluice goin', I'm startin' to see some culuh!"
*Sigh*
It could never end.
Post a Comment