"The New World Order is a controversial new film that goes behind the scenes of the American anti-globalisation movement."
I should add at this point that, unlike what the disinfo Wikipedia articles say, anti-globalisation is not the same as anti-capitalism, nor is it anti-Semitic (what!!!). I am anti-world government, very much pro-capitalism, and don't want either freedom of trade, or national sovereignty, to continue to be destroyed by our corrupt slavemasters. That is all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Older Posts
-
▼
2009
(555)
-
▼
May 2009
(66)
- Democracy is not Liberty
- Britain Needs Guns
- We're all gonna be Millionaires
- Police Thug Chokes Paramedic
- Silence = Violence?
- Freedom Grabbing in the news
- Changing Minds: One @ a Time
- Message to a Bush Kool-Aid Drinker
- Should we trust scientists on cancer causes?
- Russia Today reports on New World Order film
- Obama's Hypocrisy and the Brave New World
- The irony of the obsessive "Anti-Racists"
- The Communist Manifesto
- Waterboarding isn't torture, it's fun
- The deadly Terrorists we are fighting
- Fun with O.B.A.M.A.
- haha...everything is OK in London
- Suckers' Boom is Over
- Join or die: Left and Right Unite!
- Where's the NRA when you need them?
- Hey! AlexJonesChannel censorship ends!!!
- Discussion with a "Jew World Order" theorist
- Operation ASU: Waging InfoWarfare
- 2009 Bilderberg attendees list leaked
- Disturbing Video: Obama Youth Recruitment
- Understand Money, and ye shall be free
- FKN News: NWO Conspiracy Bullshx
- Britons never shall be slaves*
- More from Charlie Skelton
- Boy Scouts now part of Obama Youth
- Guardian Bilderberg reporter arrested
- George Green on the Elites
- The Hand That Feeds
- Unemployed? Join the Government
- Open invite to pro-choice people
- Message from the Local Resistance?
- Flashback: Hate Crime Police Raid 150 Homes
- A Trick of the Mind
- Want proof the US government runs Afghan drugs?
- The call that started a YouTube censorship war
- Where do all the Newly Unemployed go?
- Philip Bobbitt says burning the Constitution is good?
- The Fabian Strategy
- Receiveth the Mark of the Beast
- Terror, RFIDs, New World Order, and Freedom
- New UK Column
- Mao's Little Red Book, Obama's Little Blue Book
- Banks are having a great crisis as usual
- Orwell's 1984 vs Britain 2009
- Will Montana stand alone? No!
- This Year's Bilderberg pre-meeting Leaks...
- Bailing out the World: Latest Figures
- Michael Badnarik: "No, I Will Not Comply!"
- You can trust him, he wears a ski mask.
- I'm a citizen, I wanna be in charge!
- Jacqui Smith...kind of like Stalin
- A Tale of two Gun Laws
- UN Declaration of Human Rights = Meaningless
- Alex Jones CENSORED by YouTube!!! (edit)
- An answer to Liberty Movement Infighting
- 2008: the year the media forgot Dr Paul
- Liberty
- Swine Flu: Hoax, PSYOP, Practice for Martial Law
- Why Swine Flu is waking people up
- Should the UK break up?
- Listing Alex Jones' websites
-
▼
May 2009
(66)
Undebunkable Chemtrails Video That The "Debunkers" Ignore...
...and yes, Chemtrails interfere with weather
(but why they are used, no-one fully knows...)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)
I'm Already Against The Next War
Stop the propaganda before it's here. If some kind of terror attack happens in the West, Iran probably didn't do it. They have no history of imperialism and would be suicidal to attack the West. Think who benefits. No bombing of Iran.
Posts
.jpg)
13 comments:
Smart Smart...and we were just talking about Alex Jones.
The answer to 1984...is 1776! :)
Isn't the meaning of that saying lost or different in Britain?
:D
(Accidentally used my mom's account in deleted comment.)
The meaning of 1776 in Britain? Well, the American Revolution isn't well taught in Britain, so I guess you're right.
But we know 1776 was extremely justified, and the British Empire didn't treat its native citizens much better than others in the colonies abroad. The British establishment may have resented America throughout the 1800s because of this, but the ordinary people always supported the Americans, in particular during the Civil War and getting rid of slavery.
If an American knows what 1984 means, then a Brit with at least some basic historical knowledge will get what 1776 was all about.
Oh, that was you Son? haha stop hacking other peoples' accounts lol
We share a computer, what can I say?
LOL!
Okay, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
BTW, from one American to another-in-spirit, I side with the Confederates in the War for Southern Independence.
I would have fought tooth 'n' nail to abolish slavery, but I would have to side with states' rights on that one.
It was an insane war that didn't need to happen, but the wrong side won once it started.
That is, I would have to side with states' rights on that war, not slavery.
Oh yeah, I'm not saying the Civil war was about slavery as the modern storyline goes. I'm just saying that during the Civil War era, there was much working class support in this country for Abraham Lincoln.
When I read more about the Civil War a while back, I came to pretty much the same opinion as you. Unfortunately nowadays, you've got a crowd of zombies who think states' rights means the right to engage in slavery, and therefore they support power centralisation.
It's another case of history being written by the victors.
ooh and I see your italic pedantry, yes it was a war between two nations, techincally not a civil war. My last point above applies to this as well.
Okay, I hate to keep stringing these comments along, but I had to look up what a "pedantry" was.
(A flower or rule of grammar, I wasn't sure; "I have a pedantry?")
And, while we're seeing eye to eye that it was between two nations, the italic thing was about my lack of proof-reading, because I thought my phraseology might be construed to mean I favored the right of a state to continue slavery.
Oh, how confusing! :)
From dictionary.com
"Pedantry: slavish attention to rules, details, etc."
I thought you used the italics to emphasise to me that it was a *war*, not a *civil war* as the name goes. This is a detail that others who support the Confederates tend to point out.
I see what you meant now. Of course, for the people who think states' rights means the right to enslave others, there are certain things states cannot do, obviously, among which is to permit slavery.
Post a Comment