I was reading this post here about George Soros, big time propagandist, which details what is allegedly his agenda. It's an interesting list - let's play a game. Good or Bad? I'm sure your views won't be the same as mine, but here:
the Soros agenda:
• promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation
Overall good, with the caveat that other nations are generally more oppressive
•promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
Generally bad
•opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act
Good
•depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral
Good (it's time someone did)
•promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
Promoting freedom of movement OK, promoting mass immigration bad
•promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
Bad
•promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
Bad
•defending the civil rights and liberties of suspected anti-American terrorists and their abettors
Good
•financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
None of my damn business
•advocating America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending
Disarmament bad, cutting spending good
•opposing the death penalty in all circumstances
I lean good on this one
•promoting socialized medicine in the United States
Bad bad bad
•promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is ’not clean air and clean water, [but] rather … the demolition of technological/industrial civilization”
Doubleplusungood
•bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations
UNspeakably bad
•promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike
Truly bad
•promoting taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand
Bad
•advocating stricter gun-control measures
Off the scale, crimes-against-humanity bad
•advocating the legalization of marijuana
Good (shame he chickens out on legalising heroin and crack, in my opinion)
I would like to add a few:
- Telling the left they can simultaneously oppose one military atrocity in Iraq, yet defend another identical occupation in Afghanistan
- Promoting pro-Israel, pro-ethnic cleansing views amongst the left wing
- Profiting from others' misfortune to the extent that you can proclaim you are 'having a great crisis' (which you clearly were involved in creating since you saw it coming)
That will do. Did I mention Soros was a Nazi collaborator who pretended to be a Christian during the Holocaust, but at the same time had no problem with serving his more pure masters? Then he was whisked off to Britain, the real global Nazi HQ, straight after the war to be trained as I guess a replacement for Goebbels. A Jewish Nazi. Interesting.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Older Posts
-
▼
2010
(647)
-
▼
Feb 2010
(43)
- "Karl Rove, You Are A Bad Man Sir"
- What Was COP15 Really Like?
- Heresy! - Christian Gnostics
- David Icke and Alex Jones, Over Time
- The Untold History of Jewish Opposition to Zionism
- Chemtrails: A Mystery
- Dr. Evil Wasn't Counting on Fiat Monetary Inflation
- Lamebook - Rebellion of the Stupid
- Another Interesting 'Fnord'
- David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews
- Cheers, Globalist Gordon
- How to Eradicate a Disease - Change Its Name
- Nigel Farage: Who is Herman van Rompuy?
- British Soldiers: 17000 AWOL cases since 2003
- So Ridiculous I Had To Post It
- Toyota vs Big Pharma
- Who Got The Tea Parties Started?
- More Doctors Prefer the AK-Vaccine-47 Rifle by Merck
- One Thousand Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
- An excercise in doublethink: Global Weirding
- Ron Paul vs Fascist Ex-Bushies
- Megadeth: 44 Minutes (North Hollywood Shootout)
- Epic Beard Man: a folk hero
- Daily Mail: Mass Immigration is a Multiculturalist...
- Global Warming will cause...er...something
- How Did These Terrorists Get British Passports?
- "Pro Defence Libertarian"
- Iran Sanctions, just like Iraq, right?
- Why We Should Witch Hunt 9/11 Truthers
- The UK's So-Called Climategate "Inquiry"
- Local BNP Activism
- No, it's the Conspiracy Theorists who peddle the p...
- David Icke on Bohemian Grove
- BBC Poll: Climate Scepticism Rising
- Mark Dice on the Roots of the Illuminati
- "Israel Please, No More Bin Laden Tapes, Nobody Is...
- How dare you expose my corruption on TV! - Tim Yeo MP
- What did Marx really mean by Peace? What do we all...
- Propaganda: Mixing of the Good and the Bad
- Michael Mann as innocent as OJ
- Obama can save Presidency...by Bombing Iran!
- Lord Monckton debates Climate Change on Aussie radio
- The BBC's Huge Financial Stake In Climate Change A...
-
▼
Feb 2010
(43)
Undebunkable Chemtrails Video That The "Debunkers" Ignore...
...and yes, Chemtrails interfere with weather
(but why they are used, no-one fully knows...)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)
I'm Already Against The Next War
Stop the propaganda before it's here. If some kind of terror attack happens in the West, Iran probably didn't do it. They have no history of imperialism and would be suicidal to attack the West. Think who benefits. No bombing of Iran.
Posts
.jpg)
4 comments:
Yes, I agree with all of your answers except the first one and the death penalty one.
America has an oppressive government and is a generally depraved nation, but it is institutionally moral and free. Things haven't been going the way they were meant to go.
The death penalty is necessary for those who have committed premeditated murder or rape, IMHO. But, then again, that's just me.
I used to be pro-death penalty, but my recent slant against it occurred to me while I was opposing torture, the logic being that even in a regular prison innocent people get locked up but then are found later to be innocent.
Likewise with torture and killing - it's not as if some people don't deserve it but every so often the person on the wrong end of the lethal injection will be innocent. The regretful prospect of even one in fifty innocent deaths to me outweighs the regret of having the most vile people spending a lifetime in a cell.
No, I see what you're saying, America isn't institutionally that way, if you mean strictly based on the Constitution. Although would you say the values of the document were ever completely applied? Perhaps from the Civil war to 1913, although states' rights had been grossly weakened - it's debatable I guess. It's not that I agree entirely with the leftist rewriting of American history, but I kind of lean toward the Howard Zinn point of view about how America was land of the free for some white men, not for everyone.
Though I would add that unlike the typical leftist who uses that idea as an excuse to persist tyranny into the future, I say 'why not do for all people what early America did for some people'?
I am in no way trying to devalue what freedom America acheived and to some extent still has. It is a key step forward in human civilisation. But there is to me a danger of idealising it, of painting over the cracks if you will, which by doing so consigns Old America to the world of fiction and in some ways does it a disservice.
Certainly, some of the ideals (the good ones that we like to remember) that birthed American society deserve to be as 'institutional' as possible, everywhere, for the benefit of all humans. Now that's a NWO I can get behind. :)
Death penalty point well taken.
On America, the fact that the Constitution did not sanction, rather allowed and compensated for slavery shows that, indeed, a piece of the puzzle was missing in the question of Liberty versus Tyranny.
While many wished slavery to be abolished in the newly founded U.S. (Jefferson, for one), many more felt they needed it.
Slavery is that one blot on this continent that no amount of renunciation or restitution will ever redeem.
To attempt such redemption of slavery is pointless, to ignore the history of slavery is dangerous, and to capitalize on it is unfair.
Political correctness, better titled "Whitey Put Us Down", is only perpetuating the harm done by the mistakes of men in the past.
All cultures make mistakes. Call it a birth pang of Free Humanity.
Hey, in that era, with little to no historical precedent, in a world surrounded by global empire powers, to create what your ancestors did was remarkable.
I think they looked at slavery as something they couldn't get rid of, much the same way as people look at taxation today. "Yeah, it's theft, but everyone does it so it would be impossible not to" (I think taxation may one day be looked upon in a similar manner as slavery by future historians)
In the long run, feudalism is still the enemy, but thankfully an enemy that people have progressively weakened over the last 1000 years. Though like a serpent you can't kill, it just keeps coming back in different forms...
Post a Comment