Word to the wise, the interview doesn't start until 5:30 mins in.
Link to Part 1
If you find yourself a little sceptical (to say the least) of his view on the Moon, as I do, then look into what conventional science can't explain about the origins of the Moon.
- Its age (older than Earth's oldest known rocks)- Its size (waaaay too big for Earth. Compare to the size of Martian satellites)
- Its apparently inside-out structure (metals on the surface?)
- Its apparent ringing like a bell when struck by space probes. (reverberates for unusually long periods)
Yet, we do seem to need the Moon, on the other hand. It seems that without the Moon the tides would not exist. And the Moon is connected to female menstrual cycles, as well as many different animals' behaviour. But, why do we only ever see one side of the Moon? What is on the other side? What are the odds that the Moon is just precisely the right size to be the same proportion in the sky as the Sun?
As usual, think for yourself and question everything including this post no matter what the cost. I know it's insane. This world is insane. It would be more insane, in my opinion, to want to be called sane by this world as it is.
More Strange Moon Facts
Wikipedia's Formation of the Moon gives the conventional explanation
Lunartic. New word.
"The Moon Was An Inside Job"? ;)
Posts
.jpg)
2 comments:
wow! I rad over the influence of the moon on humanity in Gurfjieffs work. I didnt know than others refer to this, too. I want to know everything about it, hope Ickes book will translated in german very fast.
(Gurdjieff says, the moon holds humanity in sleep and eats our energy)
I haven't looked into this much, but I remain open to the possibility - for me the most fascinating thing about it is, like many other things, the links with ancient civilisations and their mythology. Perhaps some of them were more than just fairy tales...
Post a Comment