I Have A Conscience. White Nationalism Is Wrong.

It's funny, dear readers. Most of the time I have little to say and merely pass sniping commentary on the news. However occasionally, my primary concern is making sure I get said all I need to say. This is one of those times.

Yes it is wrong that political correctness is so unfairly biased against white people - by design.

Yes it is frustrating that what most, say, Africans would consider racial common sense, is not something that seems to exist among most Europeans, as it has been engineered out of us.

Yes the mass immigration into European countries, and European countries only, is by design to destroy them through divide and conquer methodology.

Yes it is ludicrous that white people who have a problem with any of the above are jumped on first and foremost by THEIR FELLOW WHITES who do not understand the situation.

So what drives me to write this? A number of things. Perhaps this classic Rothbard article, if you can draw the parallels. The footage of the White Nationalist (hereafter WN) march in Greece I posted eariler today, perhaps. Which I found eerily reminiscent of a Nazi rally. And I am not some politically correct fool who tosses that around cheaply. That's what it looked like. And then what? Throw the Albanians etc out by force? I have a conscience; it's not "what has to be done", it's simply wrong. Why not take that energy and act positively, buy up some land and secede. That would be a moral, voluntarist, and peaceful solution. Not an easy solution, but one that does not require a fascist purge.

Boston Massacre, 1770 - the Empire's shooting of people who only wanted their freedom. One wonders which side of the picture the spirit of the WNist leaders, stands.

And that's what WNism calls for, readers, a fascist purge. I have tried to reconcile this with individual liberty, but to no avail. It comes down to - do you prefer individual liberty, or another form of the collectivism we currently live under. I for one choose individual liberty.

It must not be forgotten that the BIGGEST destroyers of individual liberty are not the WNists, not even their demonic opposite numbers, the (book burning) so-called 'Anti Fascists'. No, it's the government. And the government is run by whoever prints and controls the money (Rothschild). I am anti-fascist. Not "an Anti Fascist" (Commie muppet). Yes I am pro-white, pro-white survival, pro-white awareness. Not a WN (Nazi muppet). The solution is not to be found in purges and 'strong leaders'.

Another thing that led me to this opinion is the constant demonisation by WNists of any opposing view, as "anti white". You can witness this on any public forum. Anti-'purge of non-whites', does not equate to anti-white! In fact, the WNist's shameless use of 'anti white' to avoid real debate, makes me wonder why they behave so much like the Jews they hate.

Liberty is the White ideal. Nothing else!

If one were to consider what is best about the West, why it has had such a standard of living and - overall - been a good example to the world (I would disagree with those who may dispute that point), it has to be the concept of individual liberty. Of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, private property, of at least having the (Christian) ideal of the 'golden rule' - treat others as you would be treated yourself.

Yes we have not lived up to the ideals. Yes America at its beginning (minus slavery of course) was a much better expression of the ideals than Europe has had, being largely dominated by monarchy and, more recently, Rothschild banking (like America). But the ideals were still there, and from time to time they kept resurfacing. This is what made the West great, and in my opinion the WNist can never acknowledge this, as it would destroy their pagan Nazi fantasies.

You want to be White, how's about defending what is truly good. As Rothbard (the good Jew, they do exist) said in that article above - get on the right side of the barricades, the peoples' side, not the state's. The alleged need for a 'strong leader' (i.e., a dictator) is ludicrous. Can whites not lead themselves? Look at Egypt, look at the Arab world, they are dominated by 'strong leaders' (dictators), and are only now taking their first steps away from that concept. The irony here is that what WNists promote is more like the Arab model, than anything remotely Western. Obviously I am generalising, but of all people, I don't think WNists will be hurt by the occasional generalisation...

Another reason, another dot, contributing to what is being said here, is Keelan Balderson's WideShut broadcast from the other day, linked here. He discusses (last 10 mins or so) the ramifications of 9/11 being blamed on Jews via Israel. Now I don't actually agree with his line of thought, as I think the facts are what they are and a large number of Zionist Jews just love the criminality and lording it over the 'goyim'. But he's right that the Israel-did-911 thing could lead to classical anti-Semitism. And NOBODY has benefited more from stirring up anti-Semitic feeling historically, than the Zionists, who use it to keep all Jews in one proverbial basket; their basket.

(Psssst btw Keelan, don't mention America and Israel wrt 9/11 without bringing up the English Crown/British Israel, as with us being in England it looks hypocritical otherwise. That's my view anyway.)

And that moves me on to who runs White Nationalism and for what purpose.

A Masonic, Royalist, British-Israel Deception

Don't deny it.

The prevalence of Masonic symbology throughout WNism is such that one cannot ignore it. Masonry is most likely (albeit not publicly) headed up by the Order of the Garter, whose head is the English monarch. Who, according to their (royalists') own British Israel doctrine, is the real throne of David. Please by all means see what patriot William Cooper had to say about British Israelism.

The fact is that, at a bare minimum over the last few centuries, the English aristocracy has intermarried with Jewish oligarch families. As LG Pine of Burke's Peerage said,

Jews "have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also."

Perhaps the connection stretches back longer; DNA tests would be fun. But whatever the truth about that, in the present era it is a safe bet that most English royal/aristocratic families are partly Jewish. So why is it that English royal David J-ahem, Duke, is the dear leader of a movement that claims to be against not only Zionist world governance, but against the Jews as a race? Perhaps, by blaming everything on Israel (as bad as Israel may be), he can protect the greater evil of British Israel from exposure? Certainly I always laugh when anyone mentions on Stormfront, the obvious truth that, say, Kate Middleton is part Jewish. That is admitted, yet most people on that site pretend it doesn't exist. I have observed this on multiple separate occasions.

Who's your daddy, WNists? Is it the English Crown and Masonry, the very people who came up with the unholy trinity of Zionism/Bolshevism/Nazism in the first place? Oh yes it is.

Albert Pike and the Third World War

Albert Pike, apart from being a Masonic god, and founder of the KKK (although Masons vehemently deny this, I suspect they're lying as that is what they tend to do), also planned - or predicted, depending on your viewpoint - three world wars. More info here. Safe to say the first two did fit his alleged plans. Now the third was to be provoked by stirring up tensions between the Zionists and Muslims. Well isn't that a coincidence.

And WNism just pops up out of nowhere, telling us that Israel is the problem and wouldn't it be great if the Arabs just dealt with Israel and then we would be free.

NO!!

That is a lie. A lie that would get a lot of Arabs killed and many Israelis too, though I suspect Israel would still win that war, by nukes if necessary.

But like most of the evils in this world, that is completely preventable.

Freedom not Fascism

So this meander has come full circle. I encourage readers to think critically about what we can do to solve the problems of our present age, without resorting to the use of violence. And if you haven't seen any Molyneux, you'd be forgiven for not knowing that government is purely violence, and is not at all a moral or indeed workable solution.

Instead of trying to stir up a Race War to get what you want, or demanding a government purge, have you considered other solutions? Have you considered how your anti-individual liberty rhetoric actually makes you less 'white'? In the name of preserving Western civilisation, your ideology will destroy it. You will cure Europa's headache by cutting off the head and goose stomping all over the brain tissue.

Have you considered how governments have deliberately incentivised immigration? Perhaps a simpler solution exists.

- No welfare state for new arrivals for 30 years, and the ending of 'affirmative action'/'positive discrimination' (disincentivises the 'bad' kind of migrant who comes for the wrong reasons)
- Immediate citizenship for anyone who wants it (prevents the illegal worker issues we have now, where businesses ship in cheaper illegal labour to pay below min wage)
- Repealing of all laws against discrimination by citizens, private landowners and small businesses (as these laws violate the individual's right to freely associate)

Think about it. Then you could just buy up some land, and everyone gets what they want, without having a Stalinist purge or a Race War. Liberty works, ladies and gentlemen. Government makes it complicated. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe there is a better or more moral solution than mine. If so, great, that's OK.

What it comes down to is the spirit of the American Revolution. Are you with Tom Paine and Patrick Henry, or King George/British Israel? The English Crown, or the people? That is the question. I hope I have made it clear which side the spirit of WNism is really on, and why.