Libya - SAS Troops On The Ground; UN Resolution Doesn't Prohibit Invasion?

Francis Boyle (not Frankie, UK readers, lol) says that invasion is possible due to the language used by the UN:



(Rebel celebrates NATO 'humanitarian' airstrike. The joke's on him though; he probably huffed DU dust from the explosion - he'll die of cancer in 20 years and his children will be born with their faces inside out)

Meanwhile SAS are already on the ground (well some of them did get caught by Gaddafi a while ago):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368247/Libya-SAS-smash-squads-ground-mark-targets-coalition-jets.html

The source said: ‘What is ruled out? An invasion. What is not ruled out? Everything else.

Typical. See, that is the language of freedom, when applied to the people. That "everything that is not prohibited, is allowed". But it should be the opposite for the government - everything not allowed is prohibited. Today however the inverse is true - government claims it has 'rights' and people have 'privileges'. Of course no individual ever claimed the right to go into someone else's house and settle domestic disputes by killing the least favourite belligerent...