Are you mad about the Lockerbie bomber release?

First off, I have been to the memorial in Lockerbie while in Scotland a few years ago. It's quite eerie to see the hundreds of names of the dead, fairly recent dead, in amongst what is otherwise an apparently untouched country village.



(Images [above below] not mine)

Story of the day in MSM land, is that the man convicted for these deaths, is freed from prison because he's going to die from cancer. He was serving a minimum 27-year life sentence that absolutely forbade parole hearings etc until that time had been served - but due to his impending death, he didn't get very far with that sentence before today's release.

To be honest, I'm not particularly outraged; in a world of banking criminals stealing and printing trillions, where the elites' lifetime dedication is to advancing eugenics, the fate of a criminal who's going to be dead in a few months just seems like a distraction. But then again I'm not a relative of someone killed in the Lockerbie bombing.

For the record, no I don't think he should have been released - and the welcome home he got landing in Libya didn't make it any better.

Now, let's add a twist to the story, shall we? It seems that the oh so righteous Rothschild minion, real behind-the-scenes leader of the UK Lord Peter Mandelson spoke with Saif Gaddafi, the son of Colonel Gaddafi, the insane Libyan dictator. And this is just a week before the release of the bomber. Aww. I'll leave interpretation of that up to you.

Lo and behold, the end result is that we have a major media distraction issue, which is also unfortunately a huge middle finger to the families of the Lockerbie dead, most of whom are American, so it becomes a foreign sh**storm too.

And another day passes with the press wasting print on a criminal who might well be dead by the time the paper gets recycled. How about reporting on the banks using the Bank of England to steal a trillion pounds? (aka the so called "bailout") How about answering the question everyone wants the answer to about the swine flu vaccine: will it be forced?

Well, the MSM might have to report on these things, if it weren't for all these convenient distractions that, daily, consume the public's limited attention span (MPs expenses, the drawn-out Gurkha immigration battle, swine fear, and now this).

And if you think I'm being cynical, then fine, but remember - this is the government that brought you this gem back in 2001:

"September 11th would be a good day to bury bad news"

In other words, they are ready and willing to manipulate the media for their own ends and don't care what or who (Lockerbie victims' families for example) gets hurt in the process.