Your TV Licence money at work: Pravda UK

Where do you want to go today? To a magical world where two economists can debate the future of the economy and BOTH say there is a jobless recovery...or to a fanciful land where rising sea levels mean people will have to move away from Australia's coast?

Thanks to your trustworthy government funded news source, you can visit both.
________________________________________________________________

Australia coastal living at risk

Australians may have to leave coastal areas as rising sea levels threaten homes, according to a new report.

The Parliamentary Committee report says urgent action is needed, as seas are expected to rise by 80cm (31 inches).

About 80% of Australians live in coastal areas, and the report recommends new laws banning further development in coastal regions.

(In other words, it's just a sick attempt at land grabbing, using the fraud of manmade climate change as a cover to seize property from citizens, to be bought up by rich fckrs for knockdown prices at a later date. It's how the envirocon works.)
________________________________________________________________

Head-to-head: What next for the US economy?

Allow me to spare you much of their academic waffle...

"John Silvia: I do not see the case for a double-dip recession...this recovery is being led by federal spending"

"Mark Perry: I think the recession ended in June and I also see no chance of a double-dip recession...we will have a 'jobless recovery' again through 2010...there is only a moderate risk of inflation"

"Mark Perry: I think the dollar's decline will stabilise before it can damage the economy"

"John Silvia: I agree on the forward momentum"

"Mark Perry: A strong economic recovery could surprise everybody"

Really, fellas? Where did the BBCCCP Pravda find these people? They've either got their head in the clouds or a fat wad of cash in their pocket. Probably both. Celente would school them.



The hilarious thing is that people will still defend the existence of the BBC because it 'provides people with a service' or some such argument. I for one say we'd be a lot better - and more informed (or should that be less misinformed) - without it.