Ah, the United Nations. Formed after WWII to prevent such a horrible situation from ever happening again. Right?
Here's a question: does the UN benefit more from preventing war or from causing war?
If the UN prevents a war, they may get a pat on the back. Good PR. Not much else.
If the UN causes or allows a war however, the public will demand more powers for the UN to intervene in the conflict with 'peacekeepers', more funding for the UN to 'rectify' the situation, etc.
Thus the incentive is much greater for the UN to create crisis than to avert it. It's the old thing about government subsidising failure. It doesn't just work with the banks...our friendly world government gets richer and more powerful in a state of crisis too. (co2 anyone?)
Korea. Vietnam. Major conflicts both caused by global powers meddling in the affairs of small nations (arbitrarily cutting them in half, what did you think would be the result of that?) It should be noted that, while it wasn't the UN that split Vietnam, this decision was made at Geneva of all places. Here's a thought - why not leave the Vietnamese to govern themselves? As for Korea, the UN was actually a belligerent in that war. While neither of these wars was UN-caused, they were caused by non-UN global governance decisions to split these countries. World government will NOT mean peace, but endless war.
Iraq. UN sanctions kill a million Iraqis between 1991-2003, including 500,000 children. (the UN admits to this heinous crime by the way, those death tolls are their own estimates.) They also use Iraq as an oil whore in the oil-for-food scam...we starved you, now give us your oil and we will feed you. Who else could get away with this other than the untouchable UN?
I don't even want to get too much into the UN and mass murder. Disarming people and allowing genocide to happen. Isn't it funny that wherever the UN goes, genocide follows.http://www.gendercide.org/case_srebrenica.html
If anyone thinks everything will get better if the UN is expanded to become an all-powerful global government, perhaps as a result of the manmade climate change scam, then consider what the UN's own Universal Declaration of Human Rights says. I have written in detail about this before, but basically it says you have no rights and are a slave to the UN's whims. (it annoys me when naive people hold up the Declaration as some kind of great document of freedom...it's the elites' sick joke on the rest of us, it is only the illusion of freedom)
Everyone, peaceniks especially, don't trust the UN! They are not a heralder of peace, unity or any such ideal, but old fashioned war and feudal slavery!
Posts
.jpg)
4 comments:
Adam spot on. Get back to Africa and check out the Swedish UN prescience.
Norway,Sweden,Finland. In the darkness bind them.
You're so cryptic sometimes Incoming...I have no idea what you said :D
Congo UN 1961. Sweden was there. Very quickly thereafter we find all sorts of social exotica turning up there, female sex tourists being one.
Why are the Nordics sitting like high Nobel occultists, controlling the evolution of human endeavour?
Hammer of the gods stuff, eh? Maybe the elite put them on a pedestal like Hitler did.
You have got a point, it is at Copenhagen where we may see the unveiling of global taxation after all.
Post a Comment