You've Been Congressed Since 1776 And Before, It's Nothing New

To 'congress' - definition:
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=congress

Note that the usage of the word to denote sexual intercourse, predates its usage to refer to a group of elected representatives.

Provides another layer to the occult symbolism in DC, put there by the predominantly Masonic founding fathers. They replaced Britannia with Columbia (the District of Columbia), same shit different day. All copies of Semiramis, don't you think? Babylon.

And then there's the Washington Monument, the Oval Office, and the...uh..."Reflecting Pool". How awkward. All m/f symbolism, all a big joke on the rest of us, a joke we aren't supposed to be privy to though.

(Apotheosis of Lincoln, found in the US Capitol. Weird...)

Let it be clear who and what was really in control, even back before the First Bank of the US, before the (con?)stitution. The symbols are the only places where these Initiated Ones don't lie to you about their crimes.

Just consider this. Out of all the US Presidents, over two hundred years of history, how many are related to the European royals? What are the odds that every single one is part of the royal bloodline, if (s)election could happen to anyone?

If you disagree with me on the idea that some of our revered heroes may have been feudal agents, what do you make of this:
"It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am." - George Washington

E Pluribus Unum, eh? Don't you think, perhaps, that the Empire simply decided that if you can't beat the revolution, join it? Lead it? Fight a bloody war and then appear to retreat. No-one would be any the wiser at first. From Federalist to Federal Reserve, it took some time, but in the long run it worked, right? Fake freedom works, it's only when we notice it is fake that they start to run scared.

Now, I'm not saying that just because someone is a Mason or whatever, they are a bad person. That's silly, especially because most Masons are decent people, but that's the point of how these societies work - they have good people on the outside who are just completely unaware of the nature of what they are a part of. Compartmentalisation. Nonetheless:

George Washington Mason
Thomas Jefferson Rosicrucian
Alexander Hamilton Rothschild agent (oh yes he was, the First Bank of the US is testament to that)
Benjamin Franklin Mason (also check out the dead bodies found in his home...do you believe he was simply doing 'anatomical research'?)
Great article discussing secret society affiliations in the early US (though it's clearly from a hyper-Christian point of view; it criticises Thomas Paine for 'not accepting the entire Bible as fact'. But still...)
Another Christian-perspective article, The Masonic Foundations of the US

However, all is not lost. I think in amongst the Brotherhood that took on the task of subtly bringing America back to colonial status, there were quite a few who didn't want to congress you. Starting with this guy.

It's amazing, though, that we collectively choose to make heroes out of the wrong people all the time. Look how many people revere Che Guevara, for instance. Very sad. I admire the average person just trying to get by and do a little good, the more I learn the less I believe in the whole concept of revering leaders, even the founding fathers (!). Call me a cynic if you will.

We are creating this reality before us, and to fix it we need not good leaders ('benevolent dictators'), not a change of heart by government (because it won't happen like that), but a change of mindset amongst all of us, that's all. (Well I may say 'that's all', though changing your mindset is certainly no small task in itself...)

I believe we are giving our power away, consenting to the system while hope-ing if we shout enough our elected reps (slavemasters) will listen to us and change things.

"Can You Hear Us Now???"
"We could hear you all along, but we only pretend to listen"

I may be wrong, but I suspect that the nature of 'democracy' is to provide such a hot air outlet to give us the illusion of freedom and representation. Some may say "if you don't vote, don't complain". I find myself coming to the opposite conclusion; if you do vote, don't complain! (But that has to be wrong, it's against all our preconceived notions about what civic virtue should mean...) To be continued.