This is a fascinating case study of the arrogant delusion of the damned. On some level they do know they're being poisoned, but they have been so mentally disarmed, they can't face it, so all they can do is laugh. Laugh! Hahahahahahaha. Cognitive dissonance.
http://www.infowars.com/warning-to-glenn-beck-dont-drink-diet-coke/Aspartame is made by Monsanto. Yum! Save some for me! And as much GM as you can manage! I shall name my many cancers, after these fine yuppie radio hosts.
Actually I wonder whether the one who talked about his wife, whether he's just pretending to be a happy consumer of poison when he's on air...these people are paid well to say what they say.
One of the best things I have done for my health is to cut out sodium fluoride aka rat poison; thankfully I do not live in a fluoridated water area so I never got a really high dose, although no doubt my IQ will still have been reduced by several points on that alone. One thing I will say is within a few months of cutting out the fluoride, and it's hard to explain this, but I became much more 'spiritually aware' if you will (without sounding egotistical), which supports the thesis that fluoride binds to/suppresses the pineal gland which is supposed to be our spiritual centre.
There's all sorts of other trace crap in the water anyway though, prozac type drugs, birth control pills, gender bending fertilisers/pesticides etc.
To become aware of the many substances that are considered 'safe' but which actually are harming you, is to become aware that there is an agenda to poison people. This conclusion is unavoidable, especially with things like aspartame.
Understand the difference between 'hard kill' and 'soft kill'. If a chemical made people drop dead instantly, everyone would catch on very quickly. If it makes people drop dead in 20 years from seemingly unrelated causes, or just sterilises them (same net result), few will ever notice. Think about it.
Fluoride
Fluoride and IQ
Nazi/Soviet use of Fluoride
"Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile."
Aspartame
More Aspartame
PS I actually have a little thesis relating to this. See, I have played a lot of FPS games, and I know by experience that in general the best players tend to be German, Slavic, British/Irish, or Scandinavian. Especially the Germans, very skilled and 'efficient' (stereotype!) they tend to be. I lose to the Germans. Now this is a sweeping generalisation, but on average I would expect a random American to lose to a random European. But why? Is fluoride a contributing factor to this? Most Europeans do not have fluoridated water, while most Americans do. Also GM could affect this. Seriously, I think that could explain this strange phenomena. And no, this isn't Freakonomics. lol
Posts
.jpg)
2 comments:
Aspartame is perfectly safe used as directed as judged by regulatory authorities worldwide. Claims of some 92+ safety issues from aspartame are not only unsubstantiated, but an alternate explanation for such arguments is likely.
ALL issues with aspartame arise, not from any aspartame safety issue, but from heightened PERSONAL sensitivities caused by a deficiency of the vitamin folic acid, by genetic folate enzyme differences (called polymorphisms that require more folate for the same function), by related methyl cycle issues like low B12, by high blood homocysteine, by ethanol abuse and by still other related issues possibly including childhood insect stings that might make a person frankly allergic. Sensitive people should visit with his (her) physician about their sensitivity, because those reporting sensitivity to aspartame may be at substantial risk of disease and cancer due to the above mentioned, referenced issues that have nothing to do with aspartame. Moreover, folate and these related issues, not aspartame, are linkable directly to nearly all 92 claimed side-effects of aspartame.
This whole issue is much like the proverbial camel already burdened by the many above-cited issues; the otherwise insignificant aspartame compares similarly to the straw that broke the camel’s back. No reasonable person would call that straw the damaging offender, but those fostering this conspiracy theory do just that. The concerned reader must realize that this long-failed aspartame internet conspiracy theory is fostered by Roberts, Blaylock, Mercola and others; commentary on these three is warranted. None are trained in pharmacology-toxicology and it shows. Consider critic Roberts, who has done a bunch of studies suggesting some people have reactions to aspartame that disappear when aspartame is no longer used. Unfortunately, he has never done any studies that even considered these vitamin and related issues I mentioned earlier. Most of Roberts criticisms are anecdotal letters to the editor that rarely receive peer review. But consider this one recent example, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/17534100. While Roberts (2007) presents the only claimed association between aspartame and thrombocytopenia. Analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) of “folate deficiency, thrombocytopenia” (without quotes) revealed over 100 such citations for folate deficiency (on March 27, 2009). His one report stands against over 100 linking this issue to folate deficiency. That would suggest he has a 99 in 100 chance of being wrong and that this is but another personal sensitivity issue unrelated to aspartame safety.
Critic Blaylock has never published anything in the primary literature about aspartame, but he writes books on this subject, based on anecdotal evidence from twenty years ago, before folate fortification became mandatory in 1998.
Mercola recently presented his case against aspartame at the Huffington Post only to be reprimanded by some serious studied opposition, see http://whatdoesthesciencesay.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/extraordinaryclaimsaboutaspartameinthehuffingtonpost.pdf. Readers should also consider Mercola's credibility http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html and that same credibility issue extends to all those fostering this conspiracy theory.
John E. Garst, Ph.D. (Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Nutrition)
Readers should also consider the credibility of Quackwatch, a site that defends fluoride. lol. You boys with your letter prefixes aren't gods.
The issue of government censorship of the truth (as described in the link you gave http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html) is very important. See it is known for instance that chlorella binds to toxins and removes them from the body, a fact demonstrated by successful use of chlorella to benefit Nagasaki/Chernobyl survivors. (page 35 - http://www.radiationdetox.com/ebook/0707RadiationDetox.pdf) Of course none of that will ever be peer reviewed, ever.
Out of the many toxin issues, aspartame is not the biggest one, I will grant that.
However, one of the things that aspartame breaks down into is phenylalaline, a substance that permeates the blood brain barrier. Not good. (http://www.jbc.org/content/261/14/6536.short)
Oddly enough aspartame has been linked to brain tumours: (http://www.dorway.com/betty/brainc.txt)
Hey, at least you raised some good points about nutrition. You're not supposed to do that. Your job is to remind us that natural health is for crazies and drugs are the only credible way to go.
It's only when you can't avoid the lies anymore (http://redpillreich.blogspot.com/), like when this poor woman got fluoride poisoning, that you see what a murderous conspiracy you front for.
Honestly how do you boys sleep at night, I don't know.
If I had a gunshot wound the first place I would go is to an allopath. If I wanted advice on how to avoid cancer, naturopathic all the way.
You have the government on your side, the big drug companies, all of it. Yet a few 'crazies' on the internet are a threat to you, and you try to censor and persecute them with your criminal FDA. Maybe the 'crazies' have a point?
Post a Comment