The NWO Re-Engineered Family

(Image source: "Australia should have a one child policy, says lobby group")

Human sexuality to split into test tubes and pleasure pills
Pravda.ru

According to Russian scientists, human sexuality will split into two separate constituents during the next several years: for receiving pleasure and for reproduction. Humans will be performing the two functions with the help of medicine: they will grow test tube babies and receive sexual pleasures with the help of special pills. If it does happen some time in the future, what is the point of having a family then?

"The reproductive process will evolve from the natural process and an attribute of human sexuality to something that will be qualified as freedom of choice. It will be a subject of rational actions, control and planning," Pavel Tishchenko, a senior scientist with the department of humanitarian expertise and bioethics of the Institute for Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences said.

The scientist believes that we are now witnessing the development of a new stage of sexual revolution - "the redeconstruction of sexuality," as he said. The separation of human sexuality into two unrelated constituents may eventually take place indeed, taking into consideration such biomedical technologies as advanced contraception, in vitro fertilization and even artificial uterus, which may become a reality already in the near future.

To exemplify his theory of a family of the future, the scientist referred to the story of two American gay men. Following their paternal instincts, the two men hired an egg donor and surrogate mothers. As a result, they became fathers to three children conceived with their sperm.

"The appearance of IVF leads to the appearance of strange identities. A baby conceived in a test tube may have up to five parents: the egg donor, the sperm donor, the surrogate mother and a couple of infertile parents, who ordered and paid the creation of the child. Children can thus be born into same-sex families too," the professor said.

The scientist told another story. A woman decided to changed her sex and then contracted a marriage with another woman. When the couple decided to have a baby, it turned out that the wife was incapable of bearing the child, but the woman's husband could do it because the man still had the uterus. To give birth to the baby, the man became a woman again and conceived the baby with the help of donor sperm. Having delivered the baby, the transgender mother decided that she would eventually like to be the father and the husband.

Nowadays, biomedical technologies can give happiness of parenthood to infertile couples. However, they can also become a loophole for those who consider natural reproduction a burden. To crown it all, such technologies generate considerable profits for commercial clinics, but no one gives any guarantees of health to "artificial" children.

Neither the Orthodox, nor the Roman Catholic Church approve such an approach to procreation. The church does not separate human sexual passion from procreation. In addition, it is absolutely natural to presume that artificial conception may result in unpredictable consequences for a child in the future.

As for sexual satisfaction, it is quite possible that future generations will prefer to simply take special pills that will stimulate the pleasure center in the brain.

The sexual and reproductive revolution may thus establish human loneliness as a universal phenomenon. If children are going to be grown in incubators and sexual pleasures will be derived from taking pills, what's the point of having a family?

Original Article

A lot of the arguments for this 'brave new world' type of arrangement, are based on the myth that the world is overpopulated, or that there is a population bomb. The world population is forecast (even by the mad eugenicists) to peak around 2050 at around 9 billion, then fall away because people with a better standard of living tend to have less children.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2361177/Two-More-Studies-Show-Human-Sperm-Loss

"In this touching yet provocative confession, one woman says... I don't need a child to be happy"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1323454/In-touching-provocative-confession-woman-says--I-dont-need-child-happy.html

Now you can say what you want, and it is certainly a valid choice by some people not to have children, but if you read the actual article, she did want children, but clearly either she or her partner was infertile, so really the choice was made for her. Still, the cool thing to do these days is get sterilised, that way you can spread STDs without worry of any unwanted consequences...

"White Americans unwilling to adopt black kids"
http://rt.com/Top_News/2010-10-11/black-kid-adoption-us.html

But they never ask why so many black kids are in adpotion to begin with, and why there are apparently so few black families to adopt them.

You'd think I would not approve of that RT report, but actually I think it's a very clever way to expose the truth. See the black woman saying that when a white family adpots a black child, that whole family becomes 'of colour' (but it would be racist not to adopt a black child). And the woman at the end disgusted by her racist, non-'diverse' white ancestry. Bwahaha, they are a parody of themselves. If you want to destroy multiculturalists, just let them speak. lol

Western Suicide

And yet if you look at the birth rates, although it seems the 'western world' is stable or a little short of stable, in truth the numbers are buoyed by the high birth rates of ethnic majorities, vs the much lower, sub-replacement birth rates of white people. Red Squirreled.

I'm sure you've seen this before. But worth linking into this post to provide another dimension to this issue. Although that video focuses on Christianity and Islam, let me tell you that I don't give a damn what book they read, that's for sure. To me all three monotheisms are accountable for their imperial, fanatical, ideological supremacist attitudes, that have been a catalyst for empire and persecution of non-'believers' everywhere they have spread. I will give Christianity credit in that sometime over the last few centuries they have shed their feudalist baggage somewhat. Arab (Semitic) Muslims have a long history of slaving both white and black kaffirs (i.e. negars).