Men in black ski masks, TV, My Pop Culture fix

Okay so I barely watch any TV myself, not anymore at least. But one thing I always notice about American crime dramas and such (we do get them over here, lol) always feature the 'good guys' bounding around in black ski masks and body armour.

They bust into someone's premises, clearing with MP5s and shotguns at the ready, but in the story there's always a justification, such as pipe bombs or perhaps a hostage. They always get the bad guys and it never goes wrong, unless of course they are held back from protecting people by nasty laws that restrict police powers. I think that's a fair generalisation.

At this point, I'm compelled to explain to anyone who may misinterpret what I'm saying as being anti-gun: I'm extremely pro-gun, quite Jeffersonian in my outlook, but am against the idea that police 'know best' at all times and should be given unlimited powers, that's all. In fact, this ties in with the pro-gun philosophy - there needs to be an unorganised citizen force to counterbalance the power of state armies and police forces, whose power must be kept in check.

"As we learned from the Clinton administration and much of the media, a machine gun in the hands of a federal agent is now a symbol of benevolence and concern for a child's well-being." - James Bovard

------------------

DANGER: What follows is an intermission that may contain popular culture. It's a trace ingredient that is known to cause allergic reactions to free minds, so read on at your own risk...

Cops with MP5s have made it to British TV too (see video below). And yes, by the way, Wire In The Blood is awesome, you should watch it. Another humourous detail is that apparently, some Americans need English subtitles on this show to understand the accents! (do we speak funny? lol)

Actor Robson Green hails from Newcastle, not far from moi, so I probably sound similar to him. But I won't call myself a Geordie for reasons of footballing significance that only locals would understand. (on that note, I still can't believe Newcastle got relegated from the Premier League and Sunderland did not. Oh the joy! Only defeating the entire New World Order would make me happier, lol)



Time to address a British pet peeve. American TV steals all our good original stuff!
Wire in the Blood --> The Mentalist
The Office
Life on Mars
Steptoe and Son --> Sanford and Son
and so on.

not that I'm too bothered, lol! ;)

But you really crossed the line when you made U-571 which depicted Americans (not Brits, as really happened) capturing the first Enigma machine! (try defending that one lol)

------------------

If you can stomach more popular culture than was contained in this intermission, click here
For the rest of you, we now return to today's post ;)

There's loads of other propaganda items that aren't unique to US programming, such as government databases helping catch that rapist, or police bending the rules to get results (and that always being for the best, because the Law knows best, of course).

So the moral of the story is...don't watch TV! ('do as I say, not as I do', and all that.)

The Scanner Says You're Guilty, Sir...

...You're gonna have to be detained and searched...

BBC - Mobile scanner could detect guns


...What's that? Are you resisting the will of the LAW? Taser! Taser! Taser!

British scientists have developed a portable microwave scanner to help police identify individuals carrying concealed guns and knives.

It is small enough to be used covertly, at some distance from the subject. The device is based around microwave radar technology and is designed to pick up the "reflections" of weapons concealed beneath clothing. Some officials believe technology like this could help increase the effectiveness of stop-and-search.

The existing prototype is suitable for the detection of guns, but researchers say subsequent versions of the technology will be able to identify concealed knives as well. The new device employs low-power microwaves to identify weapons, using similar wavelengths as the body scanners currently in use at a number of airports.

However, Professor Nick Bowring from Manchester Metropolitan University, who led the development of the new device, said it worked on a different principle. Unlike airport scanners, the portable machine does not produce an image of the subject, it only analyses signals.

"It is designed to work out on the streets and is not (restricted) to a closed, controlled environment," Professor Bowring told BBC News.

A human operator will transport the device, using it to direct microwave emission at a person of interest. Return signals - microwaves reflected back towards the device - are picked up, sensed and analysed.

"[The scanner] does a lot of computing and processing of the signals it acquires. It puts them all together, analyses them over a short period and makes a decision," said Professor Bowring.
"It works on the principle that the radar returns from people, when they are carrying a gun or a knife, look different. And we pick up on those small differences."

For the purposes of writing this I will presume these things actually WORK. It seems likely to me that the scanners would read padlocks, keys, coins, anything metal as being weapons. If I'm mistaken about that then so be it. But I digress.

Firstly, this is a perfect example of incrementalism in which the airport and airline security fears have been exploited to get people accustomed to being searched without reason. But don't worry, "if you're not doing anything wrong you've got nothing to hide". Right?

Second, as I illustrated above, it's obvious that these kinds of technology further erode what illusion of rights we still have in the face of Law Almighty; guilty until proven innocent and such.

And if you don't like it, what you gonna do, boy, we own you.

Euro Elections: Reaction ("I hate the EU" Edition)

Click here for European Election Results


British National Party Leader Elected To Europe

I will not defend the BNP for a moment. But this isn't what I'm writing about.

BNP leader Nick Griffin is now an MEP (Member of Euro Parliament). So what? I don't really care, since I do not recognise the EU as a legitimate authority over our once independent nation, but the BBC very much does.

I watched live as Griffin was announced as a representative (1 of 8 I think) for North-West England. Not a huge event, but the point is I was struck by the reaction from some of our friendly television pundits. One fat old woman remarked that we should be ashamed that we had elected a fascist to represent us.

Um...what about the fascists in the big corporate parties? Economic fascism at least. Government commanding and controlling (without owning) private for-profit companies is perhaps the worst economic system, worse than socialism even. It's why people in Britain hate so-called 'privatisation' of public services (economic fascism) and like nationalisation, when of course capitalisation (if that's a word) would get government out of the process altogether and would be the best soultion.

The be-atch then went on to compare 'gay bashers' and 'gypsy haters' with 'climate change deniers'. Nope, we're not ignorant, us 'deniers' of climate change, it *is* the sun as the evidence shows, and you are leading us into slavery with the pretence of saving the environment. Hypocritic Malthusian elitist scum.

This is also a time to consider how the label 'far right' is used. It doesn't just include fascists and racists, it also applies to people who are 'Euro-sceptic'. In other words, people who don't want to be the property of the Bilderberg Group, are extremists. Just another day in the alternate reality of the MSM. What's this, oh it's my brain! It's so clean, looks as if it's been WASHED!

The BNP are not anywhere close to being the biggest threat to our freedom in Britain today. That honour falls to the Bank of England/International Bank of Settlements first, with the EU and UN a close second. A few fools who love Labour and think the BNP are the greatest danger that ever existed, won't change that fact.

If only the anti-BNP crowd learnt of the truth about our monetary system, then they could spend their efforts campaigning for something worthwhile.

The Conservatives will not 'save us'

No, they won't. David Cameron, almost surefire to be PM after the next general election, has already gone back on earlier talk of a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. He has helped the Euro elite stab us in the front with their complete takeover of this nation in the name of international 'co-operation'.

The Conservatives are not going to address the real issues. They back the same socialist/fascist agenda with environmental and welfare overlayers. They will not end our wars, will not deal with the hundreds of QUANGOs funded by taxpayer money that are leeching off our system, will not support sound currency, will not support freedom. That is the be-all and end-all.

The EU is Illegitimate

You heard me, don't be ashamed to say it, this globalist authority is not your master unless you let it be. They write the vast majority of our laws, and our parliament has to pass them. They control our government, which makes our government equally illegitimate.

Voter turnout at this election was little more than two-fifths (43% is the figure given). Nobody gives a damn about the EU, except for on one hand, people who are opposed strongly to it, and on the other, yuppies who believe in the left-right false reality, and love the EU and everything about their own slavery. Most people obviously don't want anything to do with the EU.

By the way, it really annoys me when people say that those who don't vote are ignorant or lazy. That clearly will be true for some people, but I would argue as many or more people who are ignorant and lazy vote for a mainstream corporate party that promises them lots of free stuff in exchange for liberty. Many people who don't vote are having their own protest against the perceived legitimacy of the government, that's all. If no-one is on the ballot paper who I can at least partially agree with, I won't vote, rather than be a slave and choose a 'lesser of two evils'.

Pan-Europeanising party politics by stealth

It's noteworthy that the EU parliament is made up of only a few parties, for example the 'centre-right' European Peoples' Party. This is a party made up of many parties from individual member nations, for example the EPP includes British Conservatives, as well as mainstream right wing parties from France, Germany, Poland etc etc. The same goes for the EU Socialists, EU Greens, and so on.

Why does this matter? Because it's another piece of incrementalism. When we vote for individual parties in our respective nations, we are in fact voting for pan-EU coalitions who are represented as one bloc in the EU parliament. I'm sure many people who voted this time (myself included) were not aware of this fact. The EU are slimy crooks, aren't they?

Who Should We Vote For...If Anyone?

The litmus test for any political party or candidate is in my opinion Sound Money. Will they touch the real issue? Few in Britain will - it's why I don't regard Daniel Hannan, for example, as a complete solution to our governmental problems today. (But his speeches that made it to YouTube were of course good fun)

Do you want to talk about how the Bank of England issues worthless currency backed, in essence, by delusion and by the next generation? Do you want to talk about alternative currency solutions? Oh, that's too much for you? No votey then.

I voted for the UK Independence Party in these EU elections, since I back their EU policy (to get out now!!!). But I probably wouldn't support them to run this country, as they are a bit socialist and 'big government'. But that's fine, since you won't find many voters or parties here that don't support, for example, the NHS.

Basically, consider the Libertarians ;)
I'm not aware of any bigger parties that want to consider monetary reform. Or for that matter gun rights (save for the BNP of course).

And a final thought

We are well on the way to global government. At least the resistance is spreading, though perhaps too late to prevent a powerful federalised EU. We already there, save for an army: we have European taxes via govt contributions (£40 Million per day for the UK taxpayer!), common monetary systems (for most EU nations), open borders, a single passport, etc.

At least we can take heart from the large vote for anti-EU parties from all over Europe, especially right here. I still believe this New World Order can be prevented even without violent revolution. Since we don't have the luxury of citizen firepower like the Americans do, that won't be how to effect change in European states anyway. We must stop the propaganda and the apathy, especially among those who enforce for our corrupt masters; then change (not the fake change of Barack Obama or David Cameron) will come.

Federal Reserve stuff

End The Fed! :)


Fiat Empire: Why the Federal Reserve Violates the US Constitution


End the Fed protest, with Alex Jones on the bullhorn


Wayne Paul (brother to Ron Paul) on the Federal Reserve (from The Obama Deception)

WHO backs anti-diarrhoea Vaccine

“Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool" - from the Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) paper Rebuilding America's Defenses.


Well, we don't appear to be at that stage quite yet, but one thing that is happening is we are being hit with more vaccines than ever before. While the elites want virtually everyone to die (save for themselves of course), they also seem to be tremendously racist, and harbour the most hatred for non-whites. And more hatred means more vaccines with more stuff in 'em.

In the West, the most they can get away with is mercury/thimerosal, among other things. While horiffic, and often lethal or permanently damaging, it isn't live AIDS, is it? Africa gets the worst vaccines by far, so bad that even in these empoverished regions word has got around enough that in many areas, people refuse to get shot up at all. But when that happens, it's a tragedy, because the foolish locals believe in voodoo things like vaccines harming people. If only they were better educated, then they would learn to take their shot...

BBC - WHO backs anti-diarrhoea vaccine

The World Health Organization says a vaccine which can prevent a diarrhoea and vomiting virus should be given to all children as a routine vaccination.

Rotavirus causes more than 500,000 diarrhoeal deaths and two million hospitalisations a year among children. Over 85% of deaths occur in developing countries in Africa and Asia. International experts welcomed the WHO's recommendations, based on new research, but UK scientists have said the vaccine is too costly.

'Milestone'

The WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) made its recommendations after new data from clinical trials.

The clinical trial, which involved a range or organisations including the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations (GAVI) and drug company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), which makes the vaccine plus researchers in South Africa and Malawi, found that rotavirus vaccine significantly reduced severe diarrhoea episodes.

The WHO's Dr Thomas Cherian, said: "This is a tremendous milestone in ensuring that vaccines against the most common cause of lethal diarrhoea reach the children who need them most."

Isn't it nice that the globalists want to save the poor children? It just makes me feel all warm and autistic inside. But in the Third World, it's less autism and more, you know, stone dead.

Would you sell gold for cash NOW?!?

With gold prices close to $1000 an ounce, and forecasted by some to double as the economy gets worse, it seems the 'got gold get cash' people are back on my TV set telling me to sell my unwanted gold to them. Okay, so generally this is in the form of jewellery rather than proper gold coins etc, but still, only the zombies would believe cash has real value and gold does not.


I don't know what is more stupid at this time; selling gold, or buying into paper assets. So let's do both just to make sure...

Maybe I'm being a little harsh. Many people will be paying bills with the paper they get for their gold. But I suspect many just see the wad of paper cash and believe it's worth as much as the gold; well, it's their loss, I guess.

Baby girl forcibly Vaccinated, now Autistic

Sickening. First of all, the parents have one child that develops autism after getting shot up, then when they have a second baby they don't want to vaccinate her, but doctors (surname Mengele perhaps?) take the baby and shoot her up anyway. And guess what, she gets autism and nearly dies.



If you want more info about vaccines, I have written and linked to some good information before. Just keyword 'vaccine' into the search box. ^

What are we doing to our children?

I don't want to add anything to this, it's obvious. Read it, get mad, not too mad though, don't throw your computer out the window. It's not worth it. :)


Daily Mail Article

Little Brother is watching you: Children of ten are taught how to spot a terrorist in police DVD

Hundreds of children as young as ten are being urged to spot potential terrorists and shop them to police.

Up to 2,000 are to attend a safety event where a film will tell pupils that extremist views can develop at school.

But critics condemned the initiative as a nightmare extension of the Big Brother state. Concerns were also raised that children could become subject to police monitoring if their fellow pupils misinterpreted innocent remarks or play.

The Lancashire Police film is being shown in Blackburn as part of its long-running Streetwise event which includes demonstrations on fire safety, water hazards and first aid. A spokesman said the reference to terrorism could encompass any extremist, including animal rights activists, and not just Islamist fundamentalism.

He said: ‘It’s something we need to be aware of across the country. We’re not trying to scare anybody, we’re just raising awareness.’

But Estella Schmid, a founder of the Campaign against Criminalising Communities, warned: ‘This is a nightmare scenario. This risks criminalising children and is showing the expansion of the state into the most private areas.’

Israeli Settlers, History Written by the NWO Victors

You see, it's OK, even good, when Israeli 'settlers' (Newspeak for invaders) build on West Bank territory that *ought* to be sovereign territory of a nation called Palestine (yes such a nation does still exist).

But when these 'settlers' are removed, even on a very small scale as a PR excercise, it's just horiffic and we should condemn those who would be so nasty to the lovely Israeli 'settlers'.



(Images: Above, 1948 Palestine land ownership divided between Arabs (green) and Jews (red). Who has the majority in every region? Below, a letter from Einstein talking about Palestine.)

As the BBC story linked to above says:

"Israeli police have destroyed the small illegal settler outpost camp of Maoz Ester in the occupied West Bank. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law and widely considered a barrier to peace. But the outpost of seven huts, east of Ramallah, was among dozens of sites also illegal under Israeli law, built without government authorisation."

Widely considered a barrier to peace!? Invading another country and pitching tent on their land, then claiming you have the right to that land and anyone who doesn't say so is a Jew hater? Um...no. You are not God-Men. I do not acknowledge your right to "exist", as you so often say, if you mean to exist as a nation on stolen ground; uttering 'never again', while causing that 'again' of which you speak, to become a reality.

Media language confuses Mideast coverage

(Image: One of several maps of Israel drawn without any recognition of the Palestinians' 'right to exist'. Israel's expansionism and accusations of racism towards others, while they go out and get their 'Lebensraum' in a once sovereign state, is a great hypocrisy.)

That said, do I think the state of Israel should never have been created? Well, as I have said before, I understand given the circumstances of the early 20th Century world that 'the Jews' may wish to have their own state. But let's be realistic here, Palestine was never 'a land without a people', was it? It kind of had, you know, a native population, the majority of which were Arabs. And you came in and took over, didn't you?

It's funny, it reminds me of how American settlers behaved with the Native Americans hundreds of years ago. That was a tragedy and the end result was a slow and bloody genocide, much as we have seen in the last fifty years in Palestine. And don't bring me the same old recycled lines about terrorists and Israel's right to defend itself. For starters, you'd have to explain how Israel created Hamas then used it as justification for their operations 'abroad' in Gaza, a region of sovereign Palestine.

Israel's right to exist means its right to exist anywhere, anytime, all it has to do is point on a map and say 'this is Israel'. Possibly this could extend as far as Saudi Arabia, parts of Egypt and Iraq, etc. as these maps suggest. When Napoleon did it, he was wrong. When Hitler did it, he was wrong. When Israel does it, guess what, they are wrong too.

Israel's right to defend itself means its right to wage siege warfare on the world's largest concentration camp, Gaza, attacking sources of food, cutting off water, dehumanising humans, and not expect any retaliation. None whatsoever. Oh, you fired a rocket? You terrorist! (Even as Sderot was built on a former Palestinian settlement, the residents of which were evicted before the site was bulldozed and Sderot built in its place. Not justifying the rockets, just providing context.) Now you fired ten rockets, we get to drop a thousand bombs including white phosphorous. After all, we just defend ourselves!

But no media will report on any time in the last sixty years when Native Israelis (as they might be known if history treats them better than modernity has) were evicted by force. Nope, it didn't happen. No Israeli expansionism ever happened, they're just taking what's theirs. Like I'm taking back my wallet. It just *looks* like it's in your pocket...

It's funny when pro-Israel people remind us of the 'religion of peace' and the many atrocities committed in the name of Islam, then go ahead and butcher more people, because religious history says this they (Jews) have been promised this land! 'Religions of peace', more like.

What are moral and realistic solutions?

The consumer has helped by cutting off funds to Israel, by not buying anything with '729' at the start of the barcode. (Boycott Israeli Goods) I don't think I buy anything Israeli anyway, but there's a long list of companies that are complicit in trading goods from the Occupied Territories, who it would be best to avoid. Unfortunately, American elected representatives aren't so ethical, and like to send lots of money to Israel. A third of ALL their foreign aid, in fact.

Unfortunately, let's be realistic here, Palestine is confined to history. Anything else is nostalgia and pure hope. I think the best solution is to accept the inevitable and get the Arabs who don't want to live under Israeli rule, to go to Jordan. It's not ideal, far from it. But I'm being pragmatic here. I don't want a modern era repeat of Wounded Knee.

Apart from that, it would be nice to see international pressure on an expansionist Israel; however, with "Zion" being the pet project of the good old House of Rothschild and the other banking elites around the world, it's unlikely to ever materialise due to the scale of influence held by these money powers.

I guarantee this: the moral ideal of the two-state solution isn't going to happen. Not that it would be fair or right, but moving the Arabs who want to govern themselves as an ethnic majority (rather than be a minority in Israel) away, into Jordan or wherever else, might be a better solution. If there had been an opportunity to evacuate the Natives at Wounded Knee to somewhere safer, you would have taken it, right?