Monday, 31 May 2010
Above: the Freedom Flotilla regularly carries aid to occupied Gaza.
Treacherous, murderous, callous, words cannot describe it. You've really f***ed up this time Israel.
You know, some day the peoples of America and Europe are going to take their governments back so we don't have to send you unknown billions each year to fund this kind of crap.
In that sense, yes the blood is partially on our hands.
Thanks for again demonstrating the real Israel, behind the astroturf and the lobbying facade.
Although, most people still won't notice. Just as many forget the deliberate false flag slaughter against Americans that was the USS Liberty, so many Israel supporters will turn a blind eye to this also. Their loss and your gain, Israel. For now.
As usual, if the barcode starts with 729, don't buy it. There's one small thing you can do to bring this evil to an end.
Sunday, 30 May 2010
The article he refers to is here:
One thing he didn't mention is that Sarkozy is a committed multicultist who wants to force the French to intermarry racially; also, despite being a French leader, both he and his current wife, well if you know what to look for, their loyalty isn't to France.
BP officials have announced today that the "top kill" effort to stop the Gulf oil leak has failed. Unanticipated problems doomed the project, which involved trying to pump tens of thousands of gallons of mud, shredded rubber tires and other "junk" into the hole to try to halt the outflow of oil.
At 6pm Saturday evening, BP officials announced the "top kill" effort had failed and now they were moving on to another plan (more below).
Saturday, 29 May 2010
Today's College Students Lack Empathy
College students today are less likely to "get" the emotions of others than their counterparts 20 and 30 years ago, a new review study suggests.
Specifically, today's students scored 40 percent lower on a measure of empathy than their elders did.
The findings are based on a review of 72 studies of 14,000 American college students overall conducted between 1979 and 2009.
"We found the biggest drop in empathy after the year 2000," said Sara Konrath, a researcher at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research.
The study was presented this week at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science in Boston.
I can tell you, even in my experience the change can be seen in just a few years of young school age kids. I hypothesise that the ever increasing exposure to videogames at even preschool ages is virtually the sole cause of some children going feral, perhaps along with paedophilophobia, which is designed to keep everyone indoors under parental or CCTV supervision, because of course if little Johnny or Madeleine goes beyond the front door they will immediately be abducted by either aliens or that suspicious balding middle aged man wearing the anime T-shirt. Best to let them spend their formative years under house arrest then, that will really help their development...
(Shank, btw, in its modern context, is slang amongst British youth, and refers to an improvised knife e.g. one made from scrap metal or broken glass, or to the act of wounding someone with such a weapon. And that is actually a real film, apparently - it sounds like a documentary...)
Do we blame the young themselves, the little bastards? The big media? The school system? The parents? The desensitisation to violence? The bombardment with pictures of war, famine et al? The stress of the mandatory "modern world"? The disconnect with nature and the old ways perhaps? How about Holly/BollyWood and GayBoy Mansion? (How are adult male characters usually portrayed in modern films? What do the kids always do? They kick Daddy in the nuts, and we laugh. They're just letting you know, in their own little way, how the family is being destroyed by design, but few ever notice this.) How about the effects of a poisonous diet which - believe me - our superiors do not emulate; or, phone masts blasting out at the same frequency as the human brain?
One thing that Kamau said correctly was that "they want you dead". What he and his likely AK-7th Century Convert backers did not tell you is that it isn't just 'brothas', oh no. Doesn't work like that and it never did. But they as in "they live we sleep" do want you dead. And him too, of course, once his ilk have served their purpose.
But as long as it's not me, right? I'm safer if I shut up, obey and survive as a lapdog a little longer. Which brings us right back to the survey above.
Friday, 28 May 2010
Children, 4, 'to be fingerprinted to borrow school books from library'
by Andrew Hough for The Telegraph
Students in Manchester are having their thumbprints digitally transformed into electronic codes, which can then be recognised by a computer program.
Under the scheme, pupils swipe a bar code inside the book they want borrow then press their thumb on to a scanner to authorise the loan. Books are returned in the same way.
If you're going to make it racial, you know who overwhelmingly controls finance, though, hmm Mr Kambon? Not white people, foolish goy.
(see, it's OK to say black pride, even black power...but the faintest mention of white pride is deemed racist and bigoted. I know, even bringing this up makes me a bigot, but I can't help myself - I like pointing out these double standards objectively)
As for this one, I have no words...
Look, it's not exactly politically correct to say, but someone's got to say it. There are many many countries in Africa, the continent with the richest natural resources on Earth, that are already completely free from the horrible nasty evil White People (and their technology).
Why don't you want to live in one of them? There are plenty to choose from.
And white people are by contrast accused of 'racism' for the most superficial comments...time to find a pair and get past politically correct silence, Native European readers...
Alas, it seems they were just playing PR.
Thursday, 27 May 2010
‘Death panels’ were an overblown claim – until now
Mother Left To Starve - Really? No Death Panels?
In other words, it was actually a 'conspiracy theory' (read: beyond the limits of acceptable discussion) to tell the truth; that American socialised medicine will have the same results as all other parallel systems.
Oh, we know. Ask any average brainwashed Brit about 'the health service' and rationing of care, and they will tell you that sometimes tough decisions have to be made. They don't question that perhaps there are other ways of doing things, though. It's just accepted as part of having a government run system with limited resources and bureaucrats (who know best) in charge of distributing them 'appropriately'.
This is your 'death panel'. (they're not really very NICE, it's kind of like Miniluv, Minitruth etc)
It is unquestionable.
I don't care even if you support the economic quasi-rape that is Dr Barry Soetero's Magick Formula (removes the baby boom retirement demographic crisis in one easy step).
Death panels, as you call them, are inseparable from government run health systems. You can't have your little commie pony without accepting that it will shit all over your driveway, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
We Brits should know...we're up to our knees in the stuff.
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Last week, members of the historic Oxford Union Society, the world’s premier debating society, carried the motion “That this House would put economic growth before combating climate change” by 135 votes to 110"...
Climate Fears Turn To Doubts Among Britons
by Elisabeth Rosenthal for the New York Times
"LONDON — Last month hundreds of environmental activists crammed into an auditorium here to ponder an anguished question: If the scientific consensus on climate change has not changed, why have so many people turned away from the idea that human activity is warming the planet?
Nowhere has this shift in public opinion been more striking than in Britain, where climate change was until this year such a popular priority that in 2008 Parliament enshrined targets for emissions cuts as national law. But since then, the country has evolved into a home base for a thriving group of climate skeptics who have dominated news reports in recent months, apparently convincing many that the threat of warming is vastly exaggerated.
A survey in February by the BBC found that only 26 percent of Britons believed that “climate change is happening and is now established as largely manmade,” down from 41 percent in November 2009. A poll conducted for the German magazine Der Spiegel found that 42 percent of Germans feared global warming, down from 62 percent four years earlier.
And London’s Science Museum recently announced that a permanent exhibit scheduled to open later this year would be called the Climate Science Gallery — not the Climate Change Gallery as had previously been planned.
“Before, I thought, ‘Oh my God, this climate change problem is just dreadful,’ ” said Jillian Leddra, 50, a musician who was shopping in London on a recent lunch hour. “But now I have my doubts, and I’m wondering if it’s been overhyped.”
Perhaps sensing that climate is now a political nonstarter, David Cameron, Britain’s new Conservative prime minister, was “strangely muted” on the issue in a recent pre-election debate, as The Daily Telegraph put it, though it had previously been one of his passions.
And a poll in January of the personal priorities of 141 Conservative Party candidates deemed capable of victory in the recent election found that “reducing Britain’s carbon footprint” was the least important of the 19 issues presented to them..."
Haha...they're running away...enjoy it for just one moment. Breathe it in.
Now never forget who is behind the AGW watermelon because they have half a hundred other scams in progress to sell you into slavery. They will fabricate or genuinely cause other envirocrimes, such as this terrible gulf oil 'accident' which will be used to shaft us with the green agenda any way. The green agenda is banana republic/medieval feudalism. No more industry except military and surveillance. Labour, microchipped peasant.
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
It's worth noting that really most of us in society are allowing ourselves to be used by the system in some capacity - it's just a little more potent, poignant and undeniable when the manipulation causes men and women to kill and be killed en masse. First question is, who benefits?
US Expands Covert Military Disruption of Iran
A not so secret directive penned by Gen. David H. Petraeus authorizes sending American Special Operations troops into Iran. The directive mentions a wide swath of countries in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa, but is obviously tailored for Iran, the number one target on the Pentagon’s radar.
Hey, remember when Obama said about leaving Iraq in 2011? Nah, neither do I...I kind of like being lied to by continuously Change-ing suited stage hypnotists, really. I mean, I'm far far away from the hellish warzones. Does it really concern me? As long as the corporate media is still broadcasting, my first concern is keeping the remote just within reach of my own personal foxhole, the arse indentation on the couch...
And the exploitation takes its mostly hidden toll:
Epidemic: 6000+ U.S. Veterans Committed Suicide in 2009
With more than 6,000 veterans committing suicide every year –- and 98 veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan taking their own lives during fiscal 2009 alone -- the Department of Veterans Affairs is redoubling its outreach to veterans and promoting its toll-free suicide-prevention hotline.
National statistics show that veterans constitute about 20 percent of the 30,000 to 32,000 U.S. deaths each year from suicide. Of an average of 18 veterans who commit suicide each day, about five receive care through the VA health-care system. More than 60 percent of those five had diagnosed mental-health conditions.
The double standard on 'supporting the troops' is perhaps best exemplified by this O'Reilly classic. Of course, you don't have to 'support the troops' anymore, once they are no longer of use to the government. Because 'supporting the troops' never actually meant supporting the troops, it meant supporting whatever the government wanted to tell the troops to do.
Welcome to Newspeakland. We've always been at war with militant Islam, didn't you know?
Monday, 24 May 2010
I saw this on the UK History Channel a few years ago (long before this blog and finally breaking out of the edu-media mind prison), thought it was interesting, but didn't really know what to make of it. It just drifted back from my subconscious recently, since I saw Michael Tsarion's Irish Origins of Civilisation videos and a few other things that indicate perhaps we are discrediting our ancestors a little.
I give you Stone Age Columbus: (sadly, the last part is missing, but you get the picture of what they're saying)
(If you prefer the dramatised, Americanised, more entertaining version see Ice Age Columbus.)
Naturally the Native Americans are getting a little offended at the idea that they may be related in some capacity to Europeans. The theory itself is not proven and there are quite a few dissenting views on the topic. But either way, the conventional view on Native American origins is debunked by the very fact that there were people in North America much sooner than previously thought.
Another thing I like specifically about this documentary is it shows (see part 2) a fine example of scientific protectionism (AGW anyone?) and how opposing views can be suppressed, not necessarily because of a grand conscious conspiracy, but due to nothing more than social stigma and peer pressure.
So, perhaps there were crossings and connections between Europe and North America at that time. That might explain why even things like European Asatru and Native American beliefs have a lot in common. As for those who are more interested in Atlantis stuff, well, is this not another possible connection pointing that way?
The similarities with the Native American perspectives are obvious; I'll explain why that is unsurprising, later :)
Update: See here.
Sunday, 23 May 2010
And now, now that the damage is assured, the government officials and the corporate media are switching over to play the aggrieved victims. They will pretend to be on the side of the American people. They will pretend that they have no more resources than you or I do, and no more power than you or I do, and no way to do anything different than accept whatever BP said, because they are just like you and I. Regular schmucks. Sadly they were naive and trusting, just like the American people, forever naive and trusting, and they took those BP officials at their word, because after all it would have been uncivil to do anything else. And it turns out that was a terrible mistake. They lied. Can you believe it?
I mean, who could have predicted? Where is Condi when you need her?
Why does anyone follow them, the people on teevee, the politicians and the talking heads? They lead us to ruin. They play the victim so that you can identify with being a victim. They show you how to be a victim: Trust people you should not trust. Don't ask questions. Don't demand access. Don't take yourself seriously. Be pleasant at all times. Don't stand up for yourself. Bend over like a good slave and take it up the backside. And then when it's too late you can have the ready-to-cry face on just like Robin, or the disgusted face like Matt.
Or maybe we can just get real and put the face on that says
we know we were all just totally screwed, again.
And who did it. And hey we're not going to wait
around for nine fucking years to let you know this time.
If you look closely, you will see the similarities to 911..."
Saturday, 22 May 2010
New U.S. Taxpayer Funded Website: "There is No Conspiracy"
by Paul Drockton
In a move that shows just how stupid our government thinks we really are, a new website, America.Gov, loudly proclaims that "there are no conspiracies". We have their word on it.
"Conspiracy theories exist in the realm of myth, where imaginations run wild, fears trump facts, and evidence is ignored. As a superpower, the United States is often cast as a villain in these dramas."
Translation, it is unpatriotic to question the "official story" on anything. Its too bad that the Founders wrote in that "Freedom of the Press" and "Freedom of Speech" provisions to the Constitution. Otherwise, there would be no need for a taxpayer funded website to debunk "Conspiracy Theorists".
Friday, 21 May 2010
Scientists in the US have succeeded in developing the first living cell to be controlled entirely by synthetic DNA.
The researchers constructed a bacterium's "genetic software" and transplanted it into a host cell.
The resulting microbe then looked and behaved like the species "dictated" by the synthetic DNA.
(video is from 2006 - so it's probably worse four years later...)
Agenda 21 is alive and well; this area is being 'rewilded' - and it won't be the last.
Edit: seems someone beat me to it on the Detroit-Mog comparison
Thursday, 20 May 2010
Hearing this talking snake reference a 'moral imperative' is enough to make one barf.
But it's still nice to know he's crapping his pants about the global awakening...
Rand Paul has come under reactionary criticism for stating his opposition to one particular part of the US Civil Rights Act, specifically the rule that businesses must comply with the same anti-discrimination law as the government. Oh, they think they've got him on this one...are we ready...OMG RACISSS!!!
It's pitiful really.
Consider this example. A business decides they don't want to serve blacks. What will then happen to that business? It will be shamed, boycotted, and most likely driven out of business or at least will incur major losses of both customers and public image.
In the modern era, by contrast, businesses are falling over themselves to appear tolerant and diverse. Why is this? (Clue: NOT because the government made a rule.)
The answer is, it's what the people want. Giving people what they want in the marketplace is good for business.
However, if you believe the people who think they've uncovered a bogeyman 'racist' here, most people can't wait to provoke people of other races by refusing to do business with them. Who is the one thinking backwardly here?
Oh, and of course, classic rule: whites are the only racists. See how quickly the insinuations of 'white' domination are raised? Although, could it not just as easily be a black owned business discriminating against white people? Actually, I wonder what some of these government schooled commies would say to that - a black or arab owned business refusing to serve white people? I bet they'd remind us that diversity is important in a multicultural society and that opposing such a business would be 'intolerant'.
Seriously. "White privilege" as taught widely at government schools is the most racist, defamatory concept present in western society today. It disgusted me when I encountered it in education; ironically most white kids are eager to believe that they must pay for the sin of being part of an allegedly 'oppressive' racial group.
I must be missing out; what privileges am I entitled to? I would like to be cut in on this white privilege deal, thank you very much. If, of course, it really does exist.
And so we have uncovered the real racists (they often call themselves 'progressives', ironically...are we in our promised 'post-racial' utopia yet, by the way? What ever would you fall back on when losing an argument if there was no more racism?). The truth hurts.
I for one respect all people, but I am not 'guilty', neither am I 'privileged', just for being white!
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Brief interlude: Miss Oklahoma stands up for states' rights (state sovereignty). The politically correct judge got owned! He wasn't expecting her response, I bet.
(Now did she really approve that for Infowars???)
Starting with what the law actually does:
"Called one of the 'toughest legislations in the nation', the law means that all immigrants in Arizona must now carry their alien registration documents and it means that police can question anyone they think may be in the United States illegally. It will also address people that knowingly hire illegal immigrants or who transport them."
That description has been criticised by some supporters of the law, who contend that the police can only inquire about the status of a potential illegal alien (love the American terminology, btw, do they arrive in saucers?) if they have 'reasonable suspicion'. Now, reasonable suspicion is vague and the same flowery rationalisation behind the un-PATRIOT Act.
On the other hand, illegal immigration is a huge problem for America with an estimated 11 million illegal aliens bringing a crime wave with them across the border from an unstable Mexico. Many are declaring themselves to be invaders, and part of groups like La Raza (the Race) designed to 'liberate' states of America and 'return' them to Me-hee-co. Bullshit based on faulty history and even faultier racial prejudice. Can you imagine if whites formed a group called 'The Race'? Yet these illegals (backed by the intelligence agencies no doubt) have the gall to not only advocate racial supremacism, but at the same time call whites racist!
So I should support the law 100%, right? It is popular after all...
Well, not completely. Although I do sympathise with the reasons for passing it.
Some problems with the law are pointed out here
I personally don't give a damn whether it may constitute racial profiling. In case you can't tell I'm growing a little tired of the race card being played every two minutes. Everything is racist unless it's either indifferent or anti-white, then it's politically correct. The illegals in America are almost all from Mexico, duh! So it is inevitable when rooting out illegals that in America's case you're not going to be as likely to investigate someone who looks Chinese than you are someone who looks Mexican. Sorry.
Still, I found this mock ad funny:
Which brings me to my next point: this law only gives the state the power to do something that in America's case, the federal government should have done years ago. But I am not holding my breath. I will only be convinced if and when we actually see truck after truck deporting illegal immigrants back across the border. Until then I refuse to believe they will actually do it (too many employers rely on the cheap labour I bet), but we shall see.
And if it does actually work out, perhaps...naw, now I am dreaming, Britain would never ever take seriously their citizenship requirements. Besides, we have open borders mandated from Brussels, just another reason to quit the EU ASAP (wishful thinking, again).
Also, one final point: do we need borders in the first place? In the future at some time I would suggest not, but for now as long as two thirds of the world is an empoverished hellhole made so in part by our financial and corporate interests, I believe local solutions like Arizona's are not merely justifiable, but necessary. Crime and instability along border regions is nothing new to history; England had major problems for centuries along the Welsh and Scottish borders. Wonder what they did with invading 'immigrants'? Probably just killed them on the spot. How's that for 'racial profiling'.
One solution NOT up for MSM disussion is to legalise ALL drugs immediately. This would crush all the drug lords, in particular the drug gangs destabilising Mexico as we speak (a major cause of Mexican migration north). In fact, the benefits of re-legalisation of all 'illegal drugs' would be tremendous in many other ways, too, but the improvements in Mexico's condition as a result would probably halt Mexican immigration into the US right then and there.
So I'm keeping an eye on this because if it is a success, and I want it to be but I have my doubts that significant deportations will actually occur, then it must not be an isolated case - popular demand will see to that.
Update: seeing how calls were made to 'boycott Arizona', Arizonans respond with their own threats of counter-boycott:
BREAKING NEWS! Oath Keepers Proves That There WERE Troops Who Refused to Confiscate Guns During Katrina
We know that wholesale gun confiscation happened during Hurricane Katrina. We watched the Chief of Police of New Orleans declare on national television that “no one [no private citizen] will be able to be armed, we’re going to take all the weapons.” We watched an old lady being tackled in her own kitchen and disarmed.
In fact, that atrocious event was one of the reasons I started Oath Keepers. But I also knew, from my service as an Army paratrooper, that there are men and women of courage, honor, and integrity in the military who would refuse to obey such orders. My goal with Oath Keepers is simply to increase their numbers and harden their resolve. But when it came to Katrina, we did not have concrete proof that some said no – until now.
What the article doesn't tell you explicitly is that the government is giving the troops these kind of questionnaires (like 'would you shoot your fellow citizens'), for the purpose of singling out and PROMOTING the troops who will 'just follow orders' in these type of situations.
Which is exactly why groups like Oath Keepers are vital.
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
Monday, 17 May 2010
The point is that it's an ideal metaphor for everything wrong with society today.
(See the rest in the link above. Ordinary people, I tell you!)
The media and advertising bombards us, every sector of the population not just young women, with false archetypes and ideals to live up to. Of course, most of these false ideals involve serving the system in some way, whether by buying stuff or by working slavishly, serving in the military, or anything else you can think of.
And we are well trained to look up. In fact, if you want my take on the global conspiracy in two words, it is "Look Up". And hopefully while you're doing so you won't ever look in a mirror for answers instead, so to speak, oh no. You've been bedazzled and disorientated.
It starts from a young age and traditionally it used to be religion that taught us to look up to priests and popes and other establishment figures, the only connections to the divine, as they proclaimed. Today we are well trained to look up to royalty and the business class; popular heroes today like Mr Sugar and Mr Branson are the new aristocracy since we grew tired of respecting the Lordships.
(We also worship money, by the way. Another hollow concept that is fake. Our money is worthless digital illusion, symbolic of our invisible-chain slavery to the finance oligarchs.)
And then the next phase of mandatory corporate environmental schooling takes place, and it's called 'fashion'. Oh spare me. No imagination, no originality, know nothing. The trick is to convince us, if we are to bring Plato into this, that there exists a Form Of The Good, and that they are the embodiment of it. Their money, their appearance, their very livelihood, makes them the ones we, the imperfect worthless corporate serfs, aspire to be.
But it's all a well-airbrushed mirage designed to control you.
So if you want the biggest, dirtiest gossip of all, the real word on the street, the whisper that brings down Babylon, it is this:
They are nothing special. You are.
(funny commentary, mind you!)
I admit though, I'm still hooked on sugar based foods. Well we can't overcome the eugenics weapons all at once now can we...
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Yes, the implications of that cannot be overlooked and are a significant concern. Sharia law is backwards and immoral.
How many Muslim arabs are there in the seats of power? How many of our political leaders have ties to Saudi or Iran or Turkey or Somalia?
Not very many. Michael Moore exhausted that one (Saudi).
How many have ties to Israel?
***DING DING DING***
(The last one is especially rich since Obama has been criticised as 'anti-Israel' for even talking about halting Jewish illegal immigration into the West Bank. Believe me, son-of-a-terrorist Rahm is there to make sure he doesn't go against the interests of the self-styled Chosen People.)
But the point is, this would be a 'legitimate' issue, one more easily discussed, if our political leaders had ties to pretty much any other country. We could talk about it in an open manner, come to the probable conclusion that is was a bad thing for the country, and advise that we have fewer politicians with ties to foreign interests that conflict with their official position.
But for some reason, when those corrupting ties are with the 'Jewish' state, it suddenly becomes 'racist' to point them out. Ever notice that?
Dual Citizenship - Loyal To Whom? (American article)
In Britain, Conservative Friends of Israel and Labour Friends of Israel are two of the most influential lobby groups in the country (in America, AIPAC is likewise). One will note both Tony Blair, architect of British involvement in the so-called 'war on terror' which is destroying many of Israel's regional competitors, is a member, as is Gordon Brown. According to this article, 80% of Conservative MPs are said to be part of CFoI.
"I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel" - David Cameron, now British PM, addressing a CFoI dinner, 2006 (source linked immediately above)
Basically, if you want to be anyone and get anywhere in British or American politics, it seems being a 'friend of Israel' helps a lot!
And now William Hague, CFoI member and your new Foreign Secretary, wants to get tough with Iran (I mean, he wants to order our men in uniform to risk their lives 'getting tough with Iran', of course). Outrageous, they haven't done anything to us. But they are a threat to Israel's dominance in the Middle East. Imagine if Israel wasn't the only rogue nuclear power over there!
1992 USA: Head of Israel Lobby quits after boasting of his influence
Can you imagine if it was any country other than Israel? France even! Imagine the outrage, the indignation of it all. People would say they were under occupation from a foreign power. The people would not rest until this injustice was righted.
But it's Israel, so don't discuss it, or you are a racist. Bring up the Holocaust (ignoring, of course, the Holodomor, Soviet genocide in the Ukraine 1932-33 Seven Million dead carried out primarily by Jewish Bolsheviks, what does that do to your sanitised version of history, didn't get taught that in school did you?) so we can avoid this difficult topic, and say something about how arabs are dangerous.
“Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care.” - Ariel Sharon (source)
So you are willing to blow up synagogues...what about a certain well known pair of Towers, Mr Sharon?
Islamism or Zionism - which is the bigger danger to the West? They must both be exposed.
Saturday, 15 May 2010
I'm trying to get the big picture here. But first be aware, in case you haven't noticed, that this is not your usual oil spill - boo hoo some birdies get sticky feathers - which then kindly disappears from your attention space and into the guilt ridden shadow of the collective unconscious.
THIS is an oil volcano the likes of which has never been seen in our history. It's not a spill because, well, it has not been spilled, it is erupting from the belly of the Earth. In unprecedented quantities, and with such force that attempts to shut it down have been epic failures.
Frankly, I haven't written anything here about it yet, simply because you and I both know that there is f*** all we can do about it except stand and watch as the satanists in charge deliberate a) how to stop the leak, and forgive my extreme cynicism but b) whether they even actually want to stop the leak. I mean, this could be a mass extinction event here, our demonically possessed ruling class might not be able to resist it!
UN Agenda 21 and population control, the peak oil/oil price fraud, the post-industrial era, 'rewilding'...no?
Here's a video from a week ago (7th May) of a flyover of the slick:
GLP thread discussing the slick
Washington's Blog has their own solution suggested, although it has had credibility questions raised about it. (edit: it has since been pulled, but fyi the suggestion was basically to cover the leak with a heavy enough sunken barge.)
WORST CASE SCENARIO:
Mass global extinction event in the oceans
BP has certainly tried to play down the scale of the incident. The government and corporate media have assisted in this.
This article, "Mother of all gushers could kill Earth's oceans", was written on 2nd May.
If we can't cap that hole that oil is going to destroy the oceans of the world. It only takes one quart of motor oil to make 250,000 gallons of ocean water toxic to wildlife. Are you starting to get the magnitude of this?
We're so used to our politicians creating false crises to forward their criminal agendas that we aren't recognizing that we're staring straight into possibly the greatest disaster mankind will ever see. Imagine what happens if that oil keeps flowing until it destroys all life in the oceans of this planet. Who knows how big of a reservoir of oil is down there.
Not to mention that the oceans are critical to maintaining the proper oxygen level in the atmosphere for human life.
We're humped. Unless God steps in and fixes this. No human can. You can be sure of that.
Also, Sherrie points out that if the oil reaches the ocean conveyor belts (global currents), which may have already happened or be about to happen, the slick could go global.
Now, the fact is - this Oil Volcano can affect and KILL ALL THE OCEANS OF THE WORLD! On the 3rd of May it was reported by a news agency to be within 24 hours of getting into the Conveyor Belt of the Oceans. Since then there has been SILENCE Regarding that fact. So we all have to assume it has gotten into the Conveyor Belt.
And she says TPTB seem to be heavily chemtrailing the area to camouflage the extent of the spill.
So, the answer is, we're probably going to bite the bullet and see how much oil really is down there. According to Wayne Madsen's article some Army Engineers think it could take TWO YEARS to seal the hole in the sea floor.
As of now nothing can stop the black gold apocalypse...
Edit: I'm not a Christian but I did find one person's reference to scripture fascinating:
8And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
9And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.
10And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters;
11And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.
Friday, 14 May 2010
(Excerpt from this article)
"War plans were revealed by Mikhail Slobodovsici, a chief adviser to the Russian leadership, when he strolled off the grounds of the Four Seasons resort, where TC had hunkered down behind armed guards and locked doors. He thought he was talking to a TC colleague when speaking with Alan Keenan, who operates the web site WeAreChange.org.
“We are deciding the future of the world,” Slobodovsici said. “We need a world government,” he said, but, referring to Iran, said “we need to get rid of them.”
Clearly, it was a TC war call. Many of the TC’s billionaires and millionaires are heavily invested in manufacturing, and wars produce huge profits.
Suddenly, Slobodovsici noticed that Keenan’s nametag was different from the TC label and said: “I can’t talk—we operate under Chatham House rules.”
Slobodovsici was ordered by the TC to order more apologies for the slaughter of an estimated 30 to 60 million inhabitants of the old Soviet Union by dictator Josef Stalin. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had abjectly apologized on the anniversary of the Katyn Forest execution of 20,000 Polish soldiers. Putin admitted that the massacre was conducted by the Soviets, not by Germans, which the Communists had claimed for half a century. Nevertheless, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev apologized again the next day (May 9), denouncing Soviet citizens for tolerating the slaughter, saying they were fully aware of the bloodletting.
Never have the illustrious members of the TC been so depressed.
“It gets worse every year, not better,” one said. “Why do we even bother to meet anymore?”
“We can’t simply give up and quit,” another responded. “Bilderberg expects us to have a plan outlined.”
Much of their distress is due to the failure to establish a world government. In the 1990s, both TC and Bilderberg confidently predicted they would obtain a world government by the year 2000. A decade later, their goal is even further away. This they blame on detested “nationalists,” who oppose surrendering sovereignty to international bodies."
Prison Planet - Trilateral Commission Wants War With Iran
Opposing the Marxist agenda is not racist...THIS is racist.
(Some people think it's just a funny parody...well if the 'bad guys' were anything but white, the film would not have been made - be honest)
They'll laugh as they watch us fall
The lucky don't care at all
No chance for fate
It's unnatural selection
I want the truth
I'm hungry for some unrest
I wanna push it beyond a peaceful protest
I wanna speak in a language that they will understand
Dedication to a new age
Is this the end of destruction and rampage?
Another chance to erase then repeat it again
Counterbalance this commotion
We're not droplets in the ocean
They'll laugh as they watch us fall
The lucky don't care at all
For fate (hey)
It's unnatural selection
I want the truth!
No religion or mind virus
Is there a hope that the facts will ever find us
Just make sure that you are looking out for number one
I'm hungry for some unrest
Well let's push it beyond a peaceful protest
I wanna speak in a language that you will understand
Counterbalance this commotion
We're not droplets in the ocean
They'll laugh as they watch us crawl
The lucky don't share at all
For fate (hey)
It's a random chance selection
I want the truth!
Try to ride out the storm
Whilst they'll make you believe
They are the special ones
(We have not been chosen)
Injustice is the norm
You won't be the first
And you know you won't be the last
Counterbalance this commotion
We're not droplets in the ocean
Ocean, ocean, ocean!
They'll laugh as they watch us fall
And the lucky, they don't care at all
For fate (hey)
It's unnatural selection,
I want the truth! I want the truth!
I want the truth! I want the truth!
Thursday, 13 May 2010
Oh, and don't be paranoid over the fact that it's a triangle pointing down, which is apparently the alchemical symbol for water. I'm not trying to get inside your mind with black magick...oooooo...spooky.
(click for bigger version)
The painting, by the way, is Cruciform by Damian Callan. Yes, I turned it upside down so it would be the right way up, if that makes sense.
I think we need all three in moderation - in fact I think it's not possible to be 'sane' as we perceive it without some elements of the three. It's pretty self-explanatory what happens if one of these concepts is in excess - one may become cold and detached, as in the case of hyper-materialist scientists like Dr Eric Pianka; one may become a hyper-judgemental Fundie Christian whose favourite hobby is telling everyone else how they're going to Hell; or one may become a wishy-washy type who, frankly, has lost their grounding here on Earth (can't think of any examples right now, but if I do, I'll link it).
Classical religion has, I would suggest, created disharmony by suppressing the spiritual female and overemphasising the male, perhaps (chicken or egg) this is a cause of traditional mistreatment of women. And by 'mistreatment', I DO NOT mean what most feminists consider to be 'inequality' today...I mean back when women were actually viewed as property. Or I mean what still goes on today in the Islamic world.
That brings me to another point - naming the religions and spiritual doctrines. Obviously Christianity is my personal experience, but if I lived somewhere else in the world it would be Islam or Judaism, which both fit the same bill, IMO, as hyper-male, militaristic (homosexual?) religions. But what if it was Buddhism or something like that? That would probably belong on the left instead.
Finally, when I say 'male' and 'female', I am clearly not just talking about physical males and females. These are spiritual concepts and psychological ones too. They're just associated with males and females for obvious reasons. Everyone has some element of both, and rightly so.
I just made this as a diagrammatic representation of what I consider to be a healthy spiritual/psychological state...if you find yourself expressing too much of one concept, chances are the solution can be found in one of the other two. It's all about balance.
Food and Ethanol Shortages Imminent as Earth Enters New Cold Climate Era
Space and Science Research Center
The Space and Science Research Center (SSRC), the leading independent research organization in the United States on the subject of the next climate change, issues today the following warning of imminent crop damage expected to produce food and ethanol shortages for the US and Canada:
Over the next 30 months, global temperatures are expected to make another dramatic drop even greater than that seen during the 2007-2008 period. As the Earth’s current El Nino dissipates, the planet will return to the long term temperature decline brought on by the Sun’s historic reduction in output, the on-going “solar hibernation.” In follow-up to the specific global temperature forecast posted in SSRC Press Release 4-2009, the SSRC advises that in order to return to the long term decline slope from the current El Nino induced high temperatures, a significant global cold weather re-direction must occur. According to SSRC Director John Casey, “The Earth typically makes adjustments in major temperature spikes within two to three years. In this case as we cool down from El Nino, we are dealing with the combined effects of this planetary thermodynamic normalization and the influence of the more powerful underlying global temperature downturn brought on by the solar hibernation. Both forces will present the first opportunity since the period of Sun-caused global warming period ended to witness obvious harmful agricultural impacts of the new cold climate. Analysis shows that food and crop derived fuel will for the first time, become threatened in the next two and a half years. Though the SSRC does not get involved with short term weather prediction, it would not be unusual to see these ill-effects this year much less within the next 30 months.”
The SSRC further adds that the severity of this projected near term decline may be on the order of 0.9 C to 1.1 C from present levels. Surprising cold weather fronts will adversely impact all northern grain crops including of course wheat and the corn used in ethanol for automotive fuel.
In pointing out the importance and reliability of this new temperature forecast and its effects on North American crops, Director Casey adds,” The SSRC has been the only US independent research organization to correctly predict in advance three of the most important events in all of climate science history. We accurately announced beforehand, the end of global warming, a long term drop in the Earth’s temperatures and most importantly the advent of a historic drop in the Sun’s output, a solar hibernation. The US government’s leading science organizations, NASA and NOAA have completely missed all three, as of course have United Nations climate change experts. It is only because of the amount of expected criticism we received because of our strong opposition to the Obama administration’s climate change policies and our declaration of the end of global warming, that the SSRC is not more fully accepted for its leadership role in climate change forecasting. The facts and reliability surrounding our well publicized predictions however stand as testament to the SSRC’s proven ability to understand the nature of global climate change. In view of the importance of this new forecast I have notified the Secretary of Agriculture to take immediate actions to prepare the nation’s agricultural industry for the coming crop damage.”
The SSRC places only one caveat on this forecast. Casey elaborates, “Only a stronger solar cycle with a period longer than the 206 year cycle can cause us to alter our projections. Although more research is needed in this area, none have yet shown themselves. The present hibernation is proceeding in almost lock step as the last one which occurred from 1793 to 1830. If it continues on present course, while the cold weather impacts on food and fuel announced today are certainly important, they do not compare with what is to follow later. At the bottom of the cold cycle of this hibernation in the late 2020’s and 2030’s there will likely be years with devastating to total crop losses in the Canadian and northern US grain regions.”
They can say what they like about the Sun and stuff, but I know the truth - man was responsible for causing global warming, but thanks to piracy, we have held off judgement for a while...
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Parents' outrage as Catholic school children told 'dress as a Muslim for mosque trip - or you will be branded a truant'
A Catholic schoolgirl has been branded a 'truant' by her teachers after she refused to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque.
Staff had ordered 14-year-old Amy Owen and her classmates to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote 'community cohesion.'
Parents at the 1,100 pupil Ellesmere Port Catholic High School in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire were also told they were each required to make a £3 contribution towards the trip for all Year Nine students.
But when Amy refused to dress in Muslim attire for the visit to Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool, staff warned her about rules and said refusal would mean non attendance which would then be marked down as an 'unauthorised absence.'
In a stern letter to her family with words in block capitals and underlined, the school's headmaster Peter Lee said the visit was 'as compulsory as a geography field trip.'
He added: 'There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.
'The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement. None of us would relish that.
'Whilst I may not require you to pay for this I must require your child to participate.'
It is believed up to ten other families from Amy's Year 9 classes also refused to dress as Muslims and were marked down in the truanting register.
But Amy's mother Michelle Davies, 34, a home help said: 'It's like they're putting a gun to your head - either you go to a mosque, or you're marked down as an unauthorised absence on your record - that's it no two ways about it.
Now, there are racist/theocratic Muslim arabs out there, certainly. But 'they' are not taking over the country any more than WASPs and the EDL are.
Look who is doing this to us, really. It's the state, not Muslims themselves (in this case at least). The state bureaucracy is filled with predominantly white people, frankly. It is the state that is engaging in this kind of crap, not to encourage 'cohesion' as they call it, but to discourage it.
The mindless drones that like to pose as 'teachers', or other authority figures, may well enforce this rubbish thinking it's for the 'greater good' when really it is designed to provoke YOU to go back into your little box of racial and religious division, as well as removing your freedom. It's a very simple game and unfortunately the human beings usually lose to supremacist arabs, jews, blacks and whites. Because nobody can resist a good old tribal war.
(Admitting it is the first step. Sometimes I think it would be better to kick all the immigrants out. And then I check myself - reptillian brain momentarily taking over, thinking on my behalf? You bet.)
The physical body and its DNA may be awesome, but it's not who you really are, just your vehicle. Everyone is unique on the 'inside', esoterically. To hell with the sycophantic, divisionist PC gay/race/gender 'tolerance' agenda! And stop demanding to teach 4 year olds about homosexuality, you perverted freaks!
Oh my, look at what the BBC tried to do to hide this moment of justice. They had a little 'technical glitch':
Still, "fellating Satan all day" was heard on the national news!
Any more about Zionist elites or Bilderberg connections and the obedient well-mannered politically correct establishment loving BBC viewers wouldn't have been able to handle it.
Rothschild bottom feeder, and your new chancellor, George Osborne. All you need to know.
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
If you think Cam is going to Change anything that you really want changing, you haven't been paying attention.
This is Alinsky crossing the Atlantic, only a right wing flavoured version. Underneath they're all fascists, 'socialist' or 'conservative' matters little in the grand scheme of things.
Vote for Change makes about as much sense as F*** for Virginity!
Cameron was always the choice from the start. Although I admit the last minute talks did make me hesitate a little, I have to say there is little doubt he was the insiders' frontman. He got the slick media treatment. He got the fancy slogans, the smooth PR and the internet campaign. Although he didn't get too much of it, no, too much would have ruined the chaos of the hung parliament. In fact I did suspect a couple of months before the election they eased off the Cameron PR to give Gordon a chance.
In case you haven't noticed, since most people are under the corporate spell (TV Programming), elections are as easy to control as a Simon Cowell talent contest. The voters float around, wondering what the hell is going on - or, worse, not wondering at all in some cases - and they vote for whoever the (supposedly) wise man gives the most compliments to, flitting to and fro on the most momentary of incidents, like "Bigotgate" (which should not have been a surprise to anyone by the way).
So who is Simon Cowell in the political field? Well, this election it actually is Simon Cowell, since he endorsed Cameron, but usually it is Rupert Murdoch. Or, more broadly, the brain devouring MSM as a whole.
I am not above falling for this myself. I am ashamed to say it was my foolhardiness in allowing myself to be hypnotised by Soros-Alinsky-Obama, followed by the utter obliteration of Hope afterwards, that finally deprogrammed me out of the corporate false reality, thank God. New bloody lease of life.
So I do not look down on those who expect good to come from the Eton chap and his Bilderberg attending, coke sniffing chancellor George Osborne. It's not your fault. You wanted to believe. But behind closed doors they all get together and laugh at us for our stupidity, because they know what we don't, that they are just frontmen, PR faces for the real brotherhood regime.
So turn now from Cameron, admit you were wrong, and you'll look clever later on when everyone hates the Etonian, probably because he will bring in the IMF to relegate us to third world status just like Greece. And no, you're not going to get any of your lost liberties back, not from him.
Anyone who swears loyalty to the lizard queen makes themselves an enemy of the people by default
Monday, 10 May 2010
The infertility timebomb: Are men facing rapid extinction?
by Tamara Sturtz for the Daily Mail
One in five men could suffer from fertility problems. And scientists have warned that it's just going to get worse...
There's a crisis brewing, but it has nothing to do with the economic deficit or the current political uncertainty. Scientists are warning that rising levels of male infertility have become so perilous that it is a serious 'public health issue'. And some go even further.
Professor Niels Skakkebaek, of the University of Copenhagen, describes the issue 'as important as global warming'. Last week, one science writer even suggested, in starkly terrifying terms, that if scientists from Mars were to study the male reproductive system, they would possibly conclude that man was destined for rapid extinction.
And if it continues, this trend could indicate men are on a path to becoming completely infertile within a few generations.
Perhaps General Ripper from Dr Strangelove was right?
natural phenomenon/pesticides/depleted uranium/fluoride/vaccines/genetic modification/pollution/electromagnetic pollution/artificial farming methods/...(any more to add?)
- Israel Fires on Peace Activists; 16+ Murdered in C...
- Nicolas Sarkozy: CIA Agent?
- BP Top Kill Method Fails; Workers Hospitalised
- Generation "Me"
- Newsweek Says Illegal Immigration Reduces Crime
- School Fingerprints Children Who Borrow Books
- Final Solution to the White Question?
- Oil Volcano Not Over Yet
- "Death Panels" Were Inevitable, Not A Fiction
- Rense's 2010 Predictions Compilation
- Lord Monckton Wins Oxford Global Warming Debate
- Support the Troops While Government Exploits Them,...
- Stone Age Columbus: Prehistoric Atlantic Crossing?...
- Asatru - A Native European Religion
- Gulf Oil Slick: Now That The Damage Is Done
- George Carlin: Becoming A Spectator
- Government Website Says "Conspiracies" Aren't Real...
- Love Police founder Charlie Veitch on the Alex Jon...
- Scientists Create "Artificial Life"
- Detroit Ghetto/Ghost Town Footage
- Zbigniew Brzezinski: Global Awakening is "Difficul...
- Criticism of Rand Paul Reveals The Real Racists
- Arizona Immigation Law: Can I Support It?
- Oath Keepers: Some Katrina Troops DID Refuse To Co...
- David Icke: The Warrior Within (Time To Grow Up)
- The Fake Faces of Celebrities
- This is why I quit videogames
- Hi There, Christian Zionists
- Exposing Islamism Is Good, But Exposing Zionism Is...
- Bankster Ad: "Good Banking is Good Citizenship"
- FKN Newz - The Debt, The Buck And The Ugly
- Review of the BP Oil Slick
- Trilateral Commission Leak Info To We Are Change A...
- Machete: An Anti-White Racist Film
- Muse - Unnatural Selection
- My Trinity of Spiritual Balance
- "Food and Ethanol Shortages Imminent As Earth Ente...
- A Government Takeover, Not A Muslim One
- Love Police ruins Conservative Party Press Stateme...
- Yaaaay! PM David Cameron
- Debunker Logic
- The Communists Have Got Our Precious Bodily Fluids...
- "Machete": Provoking A Race War?
- Ed Balls and Peter Mandelson Confronted Over Bilde...
- The man who says he hasn't eaten or drunk for 70 y...
- The End of Monsanto's Crops?
- Don't Vote; It Only Encourages Them
- Airport Naked Body Scanners: Useless, Perverted, a...
- Lib|Lab|Con (cigarette papers between them)
- Disproportionate Non-Representation
- Matrix Radio Talks With Near Death Experiencers
- BNP Candidate Attacked, Unprovoked, on Camera
- UKIP's Nigel Farage: "I'm lucky to be alive after ...
- Osama is in Iran, let's go get him!
- Was There A Civilisation X? Evidence Indicates The...
- Animals Murder White South African Farmers
- Don't help people reduce taxes, don't download "ex...
- Overpopulation is a Myth
- Government Food Subsidies Cause Obesity?
- Pond Scum on Mars
- Polish Plane Crash Video Maker Murdered
- Polish Plane Crash Gunshots Video: Digitally Enhan...
- Gabriella Cilmi Video: Test Your Knowledge Of Occu...
- Bible Contradictions
- Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass ...
- How to vote in the General Election
- RevolutionMuslim Group Run By Israeli Radicals?
- I Want A Bailout of Fifty Trillion Monopoly Money....
- ▼ May 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (555)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)