Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Tuesday, 29 September 2009
'Amerika' vs America
'Sprayed from the sky' - Chemtrails
GM foods - dangers
WTO and IMF - see Confessions of an Economic Hitman
100+ wealthiest individuals = Bilderberg Group
'Poisonous Inoculations' - see Dr. Tenpenny
Mercury's good (YUM!) - see this crazy news report, or this study for the truth
Royal Institute of International Affairs
'Their plan' - see Georgia Guidestones
"You may despise my words" - Cognitive Dissonance
They (Diebold) count the votes
Judge Napolitano's "A Nation of Sheep"
Local news report on barium in chemtrails
Good UK site (with chemtrail-related US patents)
The annoying thing about chemtrails is, while there is much speculation concerning the subject (and to an extent it's a matter of 'seeing is believing'), it's not something easily investigated. Samples, when obtained, are criticised because they obviously must come from ground level and "therefore", those who believe chemtrails don't exist say, "you can't prove what caused the level of barium in the sample".
You've probably got two eyes; use them. Does that look natural to you? How about normal? Healthy? Safe? Easily explained away?
Sunday, 27 September 2009
BBC - Bus CCTV could predict assaults
CCTV security systems could soon spot an assault on a bus before it happens, according to a major research project.
The system, part of which has already been tested in laboratory conditions, looks for suspicious behaviour associated with crime.
It would be able to send live CCTV pictures to operation rooms, from where controllers would be able to intervene.
The Queens University Belfast team say the software could make a significant impact on crime on transport.
Although much of the work is currently at the theoretical stage, the team from the university's newly-founded Centre for Secure Information Technologies predict that within five years their software will be able to profile people as they board a bus.
The system would then compare who it thinks these people are, and what they are doing, with more general data on the bus's location, time of day and historic crime rates.
Once it has sifted this data, it could be able to conclude whether someone is about to commit an assault and send live pictures to controllers.
Dr Paul Miller, head of the research project, said there were millions of CCTV cameras in the UK doing very little to fight crime.
"Their impact on anti-social behaviour and criminal behaviour is negligible - assaults on buses are a major problem and very little CCTV material is analysed in real-time," he said.
Dr Miller said the 15-strong team were still developing initial databases to identify an individual's gender and body shape.
However, the team say the system goes further by then looking for recognised signs of an imminent criminal offence.
POSSIBLE SIGNS OF CRIME DETECTABLE BY SMART CCTV:
- Moving seats
- Closing in on a passenger
- Groups of young men
- Shouting at a driver
- People falling
- People loitering on stairwells
The system would only alert a controller if the sum of all of these "atomic events" added up to the profile of a possible crime. (Precrime)
"The system won't be able to say, 'this is an incident' - but it will be able to push that video stream to the top of the queue for security analysts [in a control room] to make a decision," said Dr Miller.
"Ultimately, most of the events will be benign, with nothing going on. That's why you still need the human element."
Dr Miller said that laboratory tests on gender recognition, based on a database of 4,000 faces, had proved successful and the project would move into testing systems on buses over the next year.
He conceded that buses were a "pretty challenging environment" for the software - but the benefits could be enormous.
"Research shows crimes happen when there is an opportunity and no chance of payback," he said. (tell me again why Brits get prosecuted whenever they defend themselves, and can't posess weapons of any kind?)
"If a security analyst can directly communicate with the assailant, to tell them they are being watched, it will have a marked effect on the offender. Just one example of this actually happening can have a deterrent effect on the crime rate in an area." (yeah, and the Thoughtcrime rate...)
The CCTV project is among research being conducted at the Centre for Secure Information Technology, which has launched this week. CSIT says it aims to be a "leading edge" centre in taking theoretical university work on combating cyber crime and improving security and turning it into practical tools to help police and other security services.
If you support this then I'm sorry to tell you that you must have some kind of Stockholm Syndrome for your masters.
Saturday, 26 September 2009
First of all, the album art. Debatable, but it appears to depict a lone man standing in defiance of the universe...or is that a pyramid/all-seeing eye? Interpret however you wish
Video to "Uprising":
The paranoia is in bloom, the PR
The transmissions will resume
They'll try to push drugs
Keep us all dumbed down and hope that
We will never see the truth around
Another promise, another scene, another
A package not to keep us trapped in greed
With all the green belts wrapped around our minds
And endless red tape to keep the truth confined
They will not force us
They will stop degrading us
They will not control us
We will be victorious
Interchanging mind control
Come let the revolution take it's toll if you could
Flick the switch and open your third eye, you'd see that
We should never be afraid to die
Rise up and take the power back, it's time that
The fat cats had a heart attack, you know that
Their time is coming to an end
We have to unify and watch our flag ascend
They will not force us
They will stop degrading us
They will not control us
We will be victorious
"United States of Eurasia": (not official video)
You and me are the same
We don't know or care who's to blame
But we know that whoever holds the reins
Nothing will change
Our cause has gone insane
And these wars, they can't be won
And these wars, they can't be won
And do you want them to go on
And on and on
Why split these states
When there can be only one?
And must we do as we're told?
Must we do as we're told?
You and me fall in line
To be punished for unproven crimes!
And we know that there is no one we can trust;
Our ancient heroes, they are turning to dust!
And these wars, they can't be won
Does anyone know or care how they begun?
They just promise to go on
And on and on
But soon we will see
There can be only one
Interview with Radio 1 about the album:
It's interesting that they note "The Grand Chessboard" as one of their influences rather than just "Nineteen Eighty-Four"...did he just say Council on Foreign Relations? On BBC media? Oh the humanity! The CFR is a conspiracy theory!
In my opinion the only problem is the unaware popculture sorts are misunderstanding "United States of Eurasia". It's not, in my opinion, saying the USE would be a good thing. It's describing how endless wars are driving people to see ever more global government as the only way to acheive peace, which is exactly what the Illuminists are banking on.
They decide what they want first, then create a real-world problem that will herd public opinion in the direction of support for their 'solution'.
Problem-Reaction-Solution <------ how elites control the masses (yes, they really do)
Friday, 25 September 2009
(video via Washington's Blog)
The quote he so arrogantly shouts down is from Thomas Jefferson (as the caller correctly told him), and it goes a little something like this:
Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none. (source)
However, Levin doesn't want to hear it...he also issues a 5 million dollar challenge to Ron Paul, and accuses Ron Paul supporters of not understanding the US Constitution.
Note that US Congress has not declared any war since WWII, and thus all wars since in which US forces have been involved are technically a violation of US law.
(thanks to Skeptical Eye for the video)
Can't have such disgusting, anti-American rhetoric polluting the good "conservative" airwaves now can we...it would expose that militarist conservativism is a bastardisation of conservativism designed by Marxists to discredit small government theorists in the name of pushing everyone in the direction of demanding peace via global government and socialism instead...
If you want to be techincal, the Founding Fathers were not libertarians, since that word is only a few decades old. Neither were they conservatives. They...are you ready for this...were liberals!
Somebody get that man a dictionary (from the 1700s). Before the 20th Century, 'liberal' meant what 'libertarian' does today, but unfortunately the word 'liberal' was stolen to be used as verbal camouflage by American socialists. Hence why in America it's conservative/liberal but on our side of the Atlantic it's conservative/social democrat, despite little difference in ideology.
But none of that really matters.
At the top, the fake left and right are on the same team, fighting out fake political dramas to keep you sated with disinfotainment and so that you never realise that the political frontmen cloak the real government, which is the money power of the central banks. (And yes, central banks are NOT capitalist - the Communist Manifesto calls for having a central bank.)
If people ever realise this, their tyranny is OVER. So please, help out a real pro-freedom cause; look behind the curtain of the fake political parties! Stop falling for well-paid gatekeepers of the fake left and right!
Related - Under the Government of Banks --- How An Elite Control Politics
(oh, and the source for that Levin image is great)
Thursday, 24 September 2009
But how are they diagnosed? By a doctor following an examination? By samples taken and tested for H1N1? No! You get diagnosed from a phone call. And in honesty, you would have little way of telling between 'swine' flu, other strains of flu, and a cold (or even tonsillitis!), least of all over the phone, medical professional or not.
Am I guessing people who don't have swine flu are on Tamiflu? Well, no, because that is inevitable (some are even taking it as a 'preventative', which is insane). What I am guessing is that many or maybe even most of the cases are probably not 'swine' flu. The point is that handing out drugs that can be very harmful, based on one phonecall , is irresponsible - but very profitable for the drug pushers.
Tamiflu is a costly placebo, a Big Pharma fraud
And like the Health Ranger says, nobody in the government/media is talking about Vitamin D, which naturally prevents flu, thus rendering any drug 'treatment' unnecessary.
And now for some classic FKN Newz. Swine Fear is spreading fast amongst the gullible...
The swine flu call centres where staff have nothing to do but play cards and Trivial Pursuit (nope, that isn't satire)
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
There's a lot of more detailed information on her blog and YouTube channel.
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
Verichip shares jump after H1N1 patent license win
Shares of VeriChip Corp tripled after the company said it had been granted an exclusive license to two patents, which will help it to develop implantable virus detection systems in humans.
The patents, held by VeriChip partner Receptors LLC, relate to biosensors that can detect the H1N1 and other viruses, and biological threats such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, VeriChip said in a statement.
The technology will combine with VeriChip's implantable radio frequency identification devices to develop virus triage detection systems.
Also note this story...
Novartis chip helps to ensure bitter pills are swallowed
Patients who fail to pop pills on time could soon benefit from having a chip on their shoulder, under a ground-breaking electronic system being developed by Novartis, the Swiss pharmaceuticals group.
The company is testing technology that inserts a tiny microchip into each pill swallowed and sends a reminder to patients by text message if they fail to follow their doctors’ prescriptions.
The partnership with Proteus Biomedical, which originally developed the technology, is one of several alliances under development by Novartis as it and rival pharmaceuticals companies attempt to maintain high prices for innovative medicines by ensuring that they are taken as the doctor ordered. Pfizer’s Health Solutions division has developed a system to telephone patients to encourage them to take medicine.
Joe Jimenez, head of pharmaceuticals at Novartis, said tests using the system – which broadcasts from the “chip in the pill” to a receiver on the shoulder – on 20 patients using Diovan, a drug to lower blood pressure, had boosted “compliance” with prescriptions from 30 per cent to 80 per cent after six months.
Now why don't you want an RFID chip...ye know, apart from the cancer link to implanted chips - and the fact that you would become a 24/7 tagged and tracked domestic animal...
Good site on RFID and your privacy: Spychips.com
(all photos are mine)
PS If you don't know what I'm talking about, read about chemtrails or 'persistent contrails' here
Related - Chemtrail Cinema, BBC says spraying chemicals into atmosphere is good
Note: The last shot is facing a different direction and it is debatable whether the wispy cloud visible in that shot is artificial or natural. It is not proven that chemtrails are the cause of other cloud. However, cloud seeding technology has been around for decades, and we are now told that geoengineering the atmosphere is a good thing to 'fight global warming'.
Monday, 21 September 2009
Bangkok Post (via Truth is Contagious)
Obamas to get swine flu vaccine
Published: 20/09/2009 at 10:21 PM
America's first family will get vaccinated against swine flu when they are advised to, President Barack Obama said in a television interview broadcast Sunday.
"We want to get vaccinated. We think it's the right thing to do. We will stand in line like everybody else and when folks say it's our turn, that's when we'll get it,'' Obama told CNN's "State of the Union.''
With the northern hemisphere entering its autumn flu season and infection rates again beginning to spike, many Americans are waiting for the first deliveries of (A)H1N1 vaccines, expected to come in the first weeks of October.
The emergency services personnel and others who are at risk or vulnerable, including pregnant women and children with underlying conditions, will be first to get the vaccine.
"After that, I think, you're looking at kids, so Malia and Sasha would fall into that category,'' Obama said referring to his two young daughters. "I suspect that I may come fairly far down the line.''
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said last week that the flu season had begun earlier than normal and that the number of detected cases had risen.
"The Obama family plan is to call up my HHS (Health and Human Services) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and my CDC director, and just ask them, what's your recommendation? And whatever they tell me to do, I will do,'' Obama said.
Worldwide, at least 3,205 people have died of the virus since it was uncovered in Mexico in April, according to the World Health Organization. The United States has confirmed more than 600 swine flu-related deaths.
The US government has purchased 195 million doses of swine flu vaccine and will make shots against the influenza A(H1N1) virus available free of charge starting next month.
The modern-day, limited-government movement has been co-opted. The conservatives have failed in their effort to shrink the size of government. There has not been, nor will there soon be, a conservative revolution in Washington. Political party control of the federal government has changed, but the inexorable growth in the size and scope of government has continued unabated. The liberal arguments for limited government in personal affairs and foreign military adventurism were never seriously considered as part of this revolution.
Since the change of the political party in charge has not made a difference, who’s really in charge? If the particular party in power makes little difference, whose policy is it that permits expanded government programs, increased spending, huge deficits, nation building and the pervasive invasion of our privacy, with fewer Fourth Amendment protections than ever before?
Someone is responsible, and it’s important that those of us who love liberty, and resent big-brother government, identify the philosophic supporters who have the most to say about the direction our country is going.
The godfather of modern-day neo-conservatism is considered to be Irving Kristol, father of Bill Kristol, who set the stage in 1983 with his publication Reflections of a Neoconservative. In this book, Kristol also defends the traditional liberal position on welfare.
More important than the names of people affiliated with neo-conservatism are the views they adhere to. Here is a brief summary of the general understanding of what neocons believe:
1. They agree with Trotsky on permanent revolution, violent as well as intellectual.
2. They are for redrawing the map of the Middle East and are willing to use force to do so.
3. They believe in preemptive war to achieve desired ends.
4. They accept the notion that the ends justify the means—that hard-ball politics is a moral necessity.
5. They express no opposition to the welfare state.
6. They are not bashful about an American empire; instead they strongly endorse it.
7. They believe lying is necessary for the state to survive.
8. They believe a powerful federal government is a benefit.
9. They believe pertinent facts about how a society should be run should be held by the elite and withheld from those who do not have the courage to deal with it.
10. They believe neutrality in foreign affairs is ill-advised.
11. They hold Leo Strauss in high esteem.
12. They believe imperialism, if progressive in nature, is appropriate.
13. Using American might to force American ideals on others is acceptable. Force should not be limited to the defense of our country.
14. 9-11 resulted from the lack of foreign entanglements, not from too many.
15. They dislike and despise libertarians (therefore, the same applies to all strict constitutionalists.)
16. They endorse attacks on civil liberties, such as those found in the Patriot Act, as being necessary.
17. They unconditionally support Israel and have a close alliance with the Likud Party.
Related: Stewart Rhodes (of Oath Keepers) - Neocon Think Tank Calls for Enslaving or Killing All Mexican Immigrants and Invading Mexico
(Images source: Liberty Stickers)
Sunday, 20 September 2009
Newsweek: The Case for Killing Granny
Note from the above article: the use of individual cases where eugenicist actions seem OK is a standard propaganda tactic. Another example of this is the British media's persistent focus on the Debbie Purdy case, in order to encourage looser rules on legal responsibility for those 'assisting suicide'.
Saturday, 19 September 2009
Here's a few articles that sum up the globalists' spin:
The Fed's Political Problem - how US politics threatens monetary policy (pro-Fed of course)
Is Government Too Political? - before you read this one, consider this quote from David Rockefeller: (source)
"The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
It interests me who will be voting which way in Ireland's second Lisbon Treaty vote. This can be investigated by looking at the posters for 'yes' and 'no' votes...
Here's a 'no' vote poster, clearly appealing to Ireland's struggles over the generations:
And here's a 'yes' poster, targeted instead at the fluoride headed idiots:
It's odd because the only thing to be 'enlarged' by Lisbon is the EU bureaucracy's control over everyday peoples' lives. But the people that poster is supposed to appeal to are too dumb to figure that out anyway. Vote Yes, for a dumber world!
Whew! Good to know that warmongers support the troops that they send to die!
Kissinger and other globalists are the people behind these manufactured Middle Eastern-based crises the West has endured over the last decade.
(Palestine 1940s-, Afghanistan 2001-, Pakistan border regions 2002-, Iraq 2003-, Lebanon 2006, South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2008. The elites don't like the prospect of a stable and independent Middle East, certainly. Map link)
I like to think the neocons of PNAC all have their own copy of a map like this hanging in their homes. One thing's for sure, they certainly don't watch this:
Unless they actually get a kick out of watching the suffering they've caused. Not sure on that count.
Here's a thought: When is it OK to oppose a war?
- When the hype before a war starts, you have to sit down and shut up because you don't understand the nature of the threat and why 'taking action' is so important.
- When the war begins, you must shut up because your opinion is detrimental to the war effort. And besides, nobody wants to hear your crap while they're watching the tanks and airstrikes on TV. Who cares, right? Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out!
- When the war continues, you must shut up because we've come this far now; if you don't support the war then you should have said so before it started, not now because you are running the risk that the sacrifices of our soldiers be in vain. Be strong and stay the course.
- After the war is over, it's kind of irrelevant to point out that the war was for nothing; and besides, people tend to shoot the messenger in these situations rather than even considering how their ignorance contributed to the unnecessary war in the first place. And their collective delusional blood fetish will have moved on to some other third world nation that needs to be 'freed' anyway.
One thing they definitely never consider is how their support for 'military intervention' directly contributes to deaths of their fellow countrymen in the armed forces. Nope, they rationalise it - they are supporting their leadership in doing what has to be done. Kind of the same rationale as SS death squads, don't you think?
Opposing an unnecessary war is the most wholesome example of supporting the troops. After all, supporting an unnecessary war, especially after full knowledge of that fact (think Iraq), amounts to complicity in any casualties suffered by the troops, does it not?
"No nation ever profited from a long war" - Sun Tzu
"If tyranny and opression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy" - James Madison
Reminding bloodthirsty Obama worshippers:
Obama is a puppet to the same system as Bush. That means more war, incase you don't get it.
Friday, 18 September 2009
"I just got back from a FEMA camp" by a Katrina survivor in 2005 - read and consider. Ooh, and look at the pretty pictures.
Also, here's a reply to that piece, purportedly written by "Ed Kostiuk, Oklahoma State Dept of Health, Emergency Management", i.e. one of the people overseeing operations at this camp for 'displaced persons' in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
And if you think that is too surreal, how's about all the other stuff these criminals did during/after Katrina. Saying they "wouldn't do something like holding citizens in a camp" is illogical.
Trailer to a new film called Camp Fema: American Lockdown:
(Images: Above, Iran has 100 kg enriched uranium. US has enough to blow up the whole world and then some. Below, Russia shares a border with Iran...what if they wanted to invade Mexico, Americans? Would you not be incensed by such a possibility?)
Let's see if we can make two and two equal four shall we?
10th September - Israeli PM made 'secret' visit to Russia
16th September - Panel of globalists, banksters etc advises Obama to prepare for Iran attack
18th September - Obama cancels planned 'missile shield' in Poland
It was the last thing that made me sit up and take notice, 'cause believe me, the warmongers at the Pentagon wouldn't cancel something like that without there being something in return.
Am I saying a deal was cut between USrael and Russia to 'carve up' Iran, like a repeat of the Nazi/Soviet Non-Aggression Pact? Not necessarily. But that seems possible. If that is true, and it's a big 'if', then expect an invasion of Iran within months.
And for the record, the arguments for going to war with Iran are the silliest and weakest yet. What, we had Afghanistan 'giving shelter to wanted terrorists', Iraq 'making imaginary weapons of mass destruction' and now we have Iran who 'might be building a nuke but we have no proof'.
Fact: Israel got its own nukes via covert means and to this day it refuses to admit its nuclear arsenal exists.
Fact: America is the only country to have used nuclear weapons in combat.
Fact: The claim that Ahmadinejad wanted to 'wipe Israel off the map' is bogus.
Sorry, but if you really believe the propaganda that Iran will use any nukes they may be making then I pity you. If this happened Iran would be wiped from the map by every nuke Israel and the US have. If I was running Iran right now I definitely would be trying to get nukes built because the globalists (using the US as the 'attack dog' of their New World Order) want to invade to advance their geopolitical agenda!
If Iran builds nukes then there will be no invasion.
If Iran doesn't build nukes then USraeli forces may well decide to crush another Middle Eastern nation to prevent it from attaining first-world status. Ya know, just like Colonial Iraq.
So what do you think Iran would do? Build nukes of course. Mutually Assured Destruction worked to prevent conflict during the Cold War, no? I'm thinking it would probably be a good thing here too.
Thursday, 17 September 2009
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
Statue at Lexington, depicting a Minuteman of the American Revolution.
In many ways, some Islamic cultures are incredibly dangerous and opressive. I'm not in any way defending the various horrible practices such as 'honour killings'. I'm not one of those who thinks welcoming Sharia law into our world is at all a good thing. I hold no sympathy for radical Islam which espouses the belief that Islam is to be spread by force. (Though at the same time it should be noted I think that somehow 'helping' Muslim cultures evolve by occupying them is absurd.)
The elites hate the Muslim world for reasons different to the legitimate ones. In fact, I suspect, they are afraid of Islam because of one key tenet of the faith: Jihad.
But wait, you cry, Jihad is evil! It's the reason for all this terrorism!
Nope. Real Jihad is mostly about resisting opression by the sword. (Of course, the part about expanding the 'nation of Islam' is wisely overlooked by modern Islamic scholars.) The false interpretation by 'radical Islamist' groups, many of whom bear the marks of creation by global intelligence, is just that - a distortion of the actual intent.
The globalists hate anything that bars their intent of a one-world regime. (Even if Islamic culture isn't always moral, it is definitely not tame, and therefore it poses a problem for the elite.) Thus their intent is to disarm every culture on the planet, both in terms of physical weapons and in terms of ideas.
"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?" - Joseph Stalin
The push to disarm the world physically has worked well over the last century. 'Only militaries should have guns', the globalists say. 'Then we can control everyone more easily.'
The battle for ideas has been even more successful; religion, community, culture, tradition etc have been replaced by TV-induced pop culture and the delusion of 'multiculturalism' enforced by political correctness. Oldthink is thoughtcrime.
(Now don't get me wrong, atheists, I understand and agree with many of your critiques of organised religion, but the reasons you are opposed to it are not the same reasons causing the elite to tear it down.)
The fake 'War on Terror' (war on the CIA database called 'Al-Qaeda'?) is supposed to make the concept of Jihad seem evil and make it un-politically correct to even utter a word in support of such an idea, whether you're Muslim or not.
Where have I heard this before? Ah, yes...
Jihad = Militia
Ask any (intelligent) American what 'militia' means and they'll tell you about the Revolutionary War, about how the general population took up arms for their own freedom. And about how the concept of 'militia' protects American firearms freedom and keeps the people prepared always to resist tyranny. You can see why a cartel of financial overlords looking to bankrupt the world to bring about their complete eugenicist rule, would fear the idea of 'the militia'.
So how do you demonise this militia? Easy. Stage a terror attack supposedly carried out by 'militia members'. (OKC bombing) Link the idea of militia to horrible ideas, such as white supremacism. Propagandise the American people that 'militia' is bad for these reasons, and they'll be easier to disarm and enslave later.
So how do you demonise jihadism? Easy. Stage a terror attack supposedly carried out by 'jihadists'. (Take your pick! 9/11 etc) Link the idea of jihadism to horrible ideas, such as Islamic supremacism. Propagandise the Muslim people that 'jihad' is bad for these reasons, and they'll be easier to disarm and enslave later.
Note: This has a multiplier effect; in the militia example, some American gun owners will embrace all of the ideas now linked to militia, and become racists, thus backing up the propaganda that militia=racist. Other American gun owners will be repulsed by the racism, and in doing so will also reject the concept of militia at the same time. Few will be able to split the propaganda from reality - militia does not equal racist, never has, never will, but this is how the propaganda works. Same with muslims and jihad vs. terrorist. Muslims were radicalised by this process over past decades. Mossad created Hamas. CIA/ISI created Al-Qaeda. This was a premeditated attempt to legitimise war against Islamic countries, and it worked.
Rinse and repeat.
Why do you think people irrationally hate 'nationalism' today? Why is 'protectionism' a hated word in MSM economic discussions? Why are some people trained to recoil into cognitive dissonance when the slightest mention of religion is made? Why are our soldiers fighting in the Middle East to destroy the people of the real Jihad? (who had nothing to do with 9/11 or 7/7)
Because these things block the globalists' tyranny. They block politically correct multiculturalism. They block the Roth-Rock banking cartel's desire for free international trade (for themselves). Hence the public must be brainwashed into believing the above things are bad and you mustn't even suggest them.
Concepts like Militia and Jihad give the world's rabble peasant scum too many ideas about things like freedom. Freedom is a word the elites hate so much, they're trying to replace it semantically with 'democracy' - a word which is, metaphorically speaking, choking out concepts of liberty in the struggle for ideas. (Incase you didn't know, democracy is not liberty!)
Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "There's a war on for your mind", no?
Mecca Pilgrims must have flu, H1N1 jabs to visit Saudi Arabia
How convenient. I love how the article suggests that 'viruses will spread easily' among the estimated two million Muslims who will be there. Really? By the same rationale, all those US protestors should have been forcibly vaccinated before they marched on DC.
This is just an easy way to force the poison on as many people as possible at one time...and better still from the elites' perspective, why not get as many of those Muslims as possible! (As I will explain in the next post)
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
"The Fraud of Vaccination" by Dr Hadwen, 1923
Note: This doctor was subsequently charged with manslaughter for refusing to use vaccines on someone who ended up dying (as if vaccines would have helped). I have no idea what Wikipedia is saying about Hadwen's rejection of the germ theory of disease. Maybe Hadwen did, but is that a strawman to suggest that all anti-vaccinationists disagree with the germ theory of disease? Ridiculous.
A charge levelled at people who do not believe vaccines work, is that they are against science in some way. However, the real pseudoscience is advanced by pro-vaccine people, who remind us that if we don't all take our shots, millions will die. How many times have you heard emotivist tactics, which usually go something like this:
"Imagine one in every 20 kids in every classroom in the country who wouldn't be here today if not for vaccines." (please note I pulled that number from thin air, just like the 'experts' who fearmonger with these imaginary statistics as a way of getting people to support vaccination)
You see, you should be grateful for the vaccines as they may have saved your life, and if you badmouth vaccines it's because you don't care about the children!
Keyword: 'may'. Does the data show that vaccines caused the reductions in lethal disease that we saw across the board in the 20th century?
Here's a compelling collection of numbers that suggests otherwise:
Vaccines Did Not Save Us: 2 Centuries of Official Statistics
I don't know what to make of this observer's story from during the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html (This isn't proven but it is one person's perspective and a remarkable one at that. Interpret it however you wish.)
Good sources countering the 'sick care' nature of 'modern' medicine in general:
Dare ya to read ten or more Natural News articles on anything: vaccines, cancer, drug companies, nutrition etc. You'll start looking differently at some of the 'advice' provided by the profitable cult (which is the only way I can honestly describe it) of 'modern' medicine as I now do.
Monday, 14 September 2009
This is cynical reporting, trying to play down the scale and severity of the protest. Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
ABC smears protest number
Here's a good post listing different claims by media outlets
Also, what impressed me was the apparent absence of litter afterwards, especially compared to the Obama inauguration.
Sunday, 13 September 2009
Even the paid trolls haven't bothered trying to make this one sound reasonable:
Be sure to read the comments!
Seriously, are people supposed to read that and then say "oh well, I guess if that's what it takes to keep us safe"? Who falls for that? We haven't all had enough TV/fluoride/mercury/state schooling, to be tricked that easily.
Perhaps the mainstream media should have taken heed from Abraham Lincoln:
"If you once forfeit the confidence of your fellow citizens, you can never regain their respect and esteem. It is true that you may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all the time."
Saturday, 12 September 2009
Well, they wanted to talk about Charlie Sheen's personal life, but strangely Fox News hosts Bill O'Reilly and Geraldo Rivera failed to address ANY of the points of his letter to Lord Obama.
No, that's not how the MSM works...they instead say that if you question 9/11 you are insane, drug-addled, or both. It seems Rivera is infatuated with Sheen's less than admirable past, yet doesn't care that the worst ever atrocity on US soil was whitewashed by the 9/11 Commission Report.
Here's Sheen's video message, followed by O'Reilly and Rivera's discussion on Fox News:
The talking heads don't care that Sheen's letter contains 20 valid, documented and legitimate questions about what happened on 9/11. Anything raised contrary to the agenda of the establishment, must be 'crazy'.
This is why the corporate media is discredited, it's why newspaper sales are falling, TV viewing figures are down, because people hate putting up with being lied to. So the people are becoming the media themselves and leaving the demagogue dinosaurs behind.
If you don't think there at shouldn't at least be some transparency and investigation of 9/11, then you better be armed with facts and substance, rather than half-baked ad hominem attacks. If not, then sorry; you're bringing a knife to a gun fight and deserve to be ridiculed, Faux News.
Related: Infowars deals with this issue
Ignatius Piazza: Don't Just Remember 9/11...Uncover It
UPDATE: Here's Sheen's challenge to any and all defenders of the 9/11 'official' story:
Piazza was the man behind the generosity of alias 'Millionaire Patriot', who offers free training and a handgun to anyone willing to take it up. He also runs a charitable project for a variety of causes.
Make no mistake, it's major to have someone so well respected among military and law enforcement circles and the US firearms community going public asking people to uncover 9/11. And it takes resolve to do so.
Ignatius Piazza: Don't Just Remember 9/11...Uncover It
I remember discussing the events of 9/11 a few months after it happened with an acquaintance of mine who, at the time, would have been labeled as a “conspiracy theory” nut case.
I was polite while listening to him tell me that 9/11 was an inside job by our own government to dupe the American public into willingly allowing further erosion of our civil liberties in the pursuit of “terrorists” and to rally public sentiment to support an expansion of our military presence in the Middle East through invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
At the time, I thought he was delusional. I could not imagine our own government would do anything so nefarious to the American citizenry.
Well, as more and more scientific evidence continues to pile up, as more experts release their opinions, and as more and more very credible people who were in the buildings when it happened come forward to tell their stories about what they saw and heard before, during, and after the planes struck the Twin Towers, the more it appears that the entire truth of what happened on 9/11 has yet to be told.
Now, a very professional and credible documentary has been produced in Europe. It uncovers facts not previously released in the American mainstream media or mentioned in the “official” government investigation of 9/11.
On this the anniversary of 9/11, we should honor those who died by taking a real, hard look at what happened. Ask yourself what YOU believe is the truth. I’m interested to know what you think.
Here it is…
(you'll have to go to his page to watch, it's a new film called ZERO that I would recommend, I'm watching it as I write this)
Please forward this blog to everyone you know — as I’m sure you will agree that EVERY American needs to see this.
And not just Americans, Mr Piazza, all people. Thank you for your courage.
Mail: 'You're not intelligent enough to marry', bride told
(via Connecting the Dots in the NWO)
Social workers banned a young woman from her own wedding in an extraordinary row over whether she is bright enough to get married.
Kerry Robertson, who has mild learning difficulties, was told her wedding was being halted just 48 hours before she was to walk up the aisle with fiance Mark McDougall.
Miss Robertson, 17, had bought her wedding dress and the couple had booked the church ceremony, bought the rings and organised a reception to be held last Saturday.
But two days before they were due to say their vows in front of 20 guests, social services told the bride-to-be that she would have to cancel the big day because she 'did not understand the implications of getting married'.
Yesterday, Miss Robertson, who is five months pregnant, said the decision was cruel.
She said: 'I am still so upset about everything. I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together. I love Mark and I want to get married to him.'
Miss Robertson, of Dunfermline, Fife, has been in the care of her grandmother since she was nine months old after her parents were unable to look after her, with her welfare overseen by social workers at Fife council.
And you know there's no way she's keeping that baby either. I mean, maybe we should just sterilise people who are from 'bad stock' so that we don't have to deal with this problem in the first place...
Eugenics didn't go away, it simply concealed itself better
From Wikipedia: Boiling Frog
The boiling frog story is a widespread anecdote describing a frog slowly being boiled alive. The premise is that if a frog is placed in boiling water, it will jump out, but if it is placed in cold water that is slowly heated, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death. The story is often used as a metaphor for the inability of people to react to important changes that occur gradually...
The boiling frog story is generally told in a metaphorical context, with the upshot being that people should make themselves aware of gradual change lest they suffer eventual undesirable consequences.
Friday, 11 September 2009
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot"
I admit I'm a little too late to 9/11 Truth (2008, thank you Loose Change) to be one of the 'scarce' ones. Though 'truthers' are indeed still hated and scorned. But hey, 9/11 Truth is a message of peace and love; as the story goes, an angry mob put Jesus to death because he came with a message of love, and freedom, that they weren't ready to hear.
The point is that 'truthers' have the substance, the facts, the evidence, and probably the majority of thinking people out there. (Just see the comments on this article if you don't believe me, most politically aware people question 9/11)
It's not 'leftwing', certainly not for me at least; neither is it about 'hating America', or whatever other ad hominem attack is cooked up by the real paranoid conspiracy theorists who defend the official story beyond logic and in spite of evidence. It is they who distort via disgusting media hitpieces and smear with vile personal attacks.
Though it didn't work on me so much; the BBC hitpiece was my first exposure to questioning 9/11, and I saw it was so biased that I just had to look into the 'crazy truthers' and their material. Yes, the state-run media's hitpiece was what led me to 9/11 Truth - the exact opposite of its intentions, no doubt, but never mind, that's what happened.
What we still don't know is exactly what happened on 9/11 and who made it happen. Nobody except defenders of the official account make that claim. Hence, the main call of the truther is not "9/11 was an inside job", it is "Investigate 9/11". Ask questions, demand answers. And let the evidence point where it may. And when you do that, it points only one way. Away from the official account.
All of the posts (chronological) in my 2009 9/11-a-thon:
Charlie Sheen: 20 minutes with the President
Charlie Sheen: "Challenge me on the facts"
Homeland Security: Hitler Redux
But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have talked!
Asia Times: Fifty Questions on 9/11
Cognitive Dissonance Meets 9/11 Truth
Charlie Sheen asks for meeting with Obama
8 Years on, 9/11 Families still want answers
RIP the 3000 who perished on 9/11/01. Those responsible or complicit must be exposed, lest the military/political machine fueled by false flag terror operations continue to roll.
So to say that questioning 9/11 somehow hurts the victims' families is absurd...it's the families leading the questioning! So those who oppose having a new and open investigation are the ones who are hurting the families, if anyone.
Representative of largest 9/11 families group says government complicit in the attack
9/11: Press for Truth
And here's part 1 of the 9/11 section of Zeitgeist:
Thursday, 10 September 2009
Infowars - Charlie Sheen demands Obama re-open 9/11 investigation in video message
(below: quote from Wikipedia: Cognitive Dissonance)
"The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors... Dissonance normally occurs when a person perceives a logical inconsistency among his or her cognitions."
None of these questions has been convincingly answered - according to the official narrative. It's up to US civil society to keep up the pressure. Eight years after the fact, one fundamental conclusion is imperative. The official narrative edifice of 9/11 is simply not acceptable.
Read on if thou darest...
(via Conspiracy Scope)
Comprehensive list of 9/11 whistleblowers
It should be noted that the term 'conspiracy theory' accurately describes both the official account and any alternative explanations, since all describe a covert, illegal action between multiple people, which is all 'conspiracy' means. Hate to ruin good propaganda with facts, but it doesn't mean 'woo woooo' crazy owl noises.
Why do over 800 crazy kook architects and structural engineers think there should be a new, open 9/11 investigation? View their evidence before you judge them:
Time to be courageous, boys and girls. Patriots like Charlie Sheen are risking everything, who's with them?
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
The video teaches how and why a small power elite maintain their control, and how easy it would be to break that control if everyone stops 'respecting' authority and gets out of their Stockholm syndrome mentality.
The real elites are not driven by motives of wealth and luxury; they already have it all; they are driven by motives of sadism, power and control. Therein lies the logical explanation of why these tyrants want to collapse economies and fantasise about reducing the world's population.
They shape your world. Understand their mentality:
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of our foreign policy towards the third world" - Henry Kissinger (source)
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation." - Prince Philip (source)
"[Soldiers are] dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy" - Henry Kissinger (source)
"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller, 1994 (source)
Evelyn de Rothschild
Skull and Bones
The correct answer is none of the above. In 1922 Adolph Hitler, writing about the creation of the German Gestapo wrote the above. What Hitler knew and every totalitarian government knows is that the way to gain additional power and control over the people is to have a major crisis which makes the people feel insecure and unsafe. The government then offers to protect the people from this 'new' threat. All that is required is for the people to give up some of their liberties and freedoms.
- Taken from this Prison Planet article by Kirt R. Poovey
The Patriot Act was conceived before 9/11 and rushed through afterwards without being read by those who voted on it. (I doubt hundreds of pages were written in the two days between 9/11/01 and the first draft appearing on the 13th September '01.)
Without 9/11 this act would not have had even a possibility to pass.
9/11 enabled the creation of the Department of Homeland Security just like the Reichstag Fire enabled the creation of the Gestapo.
9/11 is the reason trillions of $$$ and thousands of soldiers have been spent waging geopolitical wars in the Middle East.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
- ► 2010 (647)
- Everything is OK Montage
- Payze Duez: "We the Sheeple of Amerika"
- Best (or worst) chemtrail video ever
- News From the Department of Precrime, UK
- Muse-ing Against Tyranny
- More of Rep. Alan Grayson grilling the Fed
- Marxist Neocon Mark Levin is Evil
- How Accurate Are Swine Flu Figures, Really?
- We Are Change Investigates Military Checkpoints
- Nurse: "Why I left mainstream medicine"
- Rick Simpson's "Run From The Cure"
- Implanted microchips will make YOUR life easier! (...
- Weather - Sunny until Chemtrails, 18C
- Obama Family to get H1N1 Vaccine
- Ron Paul's "Neo-Conned" speech (2003)
- Newsweek: The Case for Killing Granny
- How An Elite Control Politics
- Become a Leader of Tomorrow, Global Citizen!
- Nigel Farage in Dublin: Lisbon Treaty Debate
- Something to ponder
- FEMA have never operated a camp, honest
- Was a deal cut with Russia over Iran?
- Flu Shot Propaganda
- The Semantic War to Destroy Jihad and Militia
- Mecca Pilgrims, take your forced vaccine
- Vaccination "a superstition" - Dr Hadwen (1923)
- How many people in DC on 9/12?
- People don't want pandemic martial law?
- O'Reilly and Rivera discredit only themselves [UPD...
- Ignatius Piazza: "Don't just remember 9/11...uncov...
- Social Services: Bride 'not intelligent enough' to...
- And thus ends my 9/11-a-thon
- 8 Years on, 9/11 Families still want answers
- Charlie Sheen asks for meeting with Obama
- Cognitive Dissonance Meets 9/11 Truth
- Asia Times: Fifty Questions on 9/11
- But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have ...
- Evelyn de Rothschild addresses Bohemian Grove
- Homeland Security: Hitler Redux
- Charlie Sheen: "Challenge me on the facts"
- Why I cannot and do not support Glenn Beck
- Charlie Sheen: 20 minutes with the President
- CLIMATE COPS: children told to monitor "climate cr...
- Enjoy a nice glass of fluoride
- Secrets of the UK National Health Service
- Why the Government Party loves the BNP
- Are you a racist?
- More School Kids Singing for Obama
- The "mark of the beast" is still coming, Brits
- ObamaCare supporter bites finger off old man...
- British "death panels", denial of care
- A question of law enforcement
- A Rothschild Education Effort
- Interesting BBC ad
- Congressman laughs in Bernanke's face
- ▼ Sep 2009 (55)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)