Friday, 31 July 2009
Guardian - Decision to introduce ID cards a 'no-brainer', says Alan Johnson
One detail to watch is that the Conservatives have pledged to cancel the ID card scheme. So I wonder how they will try and slither out of that promise like they are doing with the EU Referendum pledge.
Or maybe the cards will be scrapped - for now. They are very unpopular I believe, but then I don't think people had a huge amount of support for bailouts or 'anti-terrorism' powers either, so we will see.
As for why you wouldn't want a national ID card, well if you aren't opposed to that then I pity you, get familiar with the basic concepts of liberty so you can see how every one of them is under attack.
Despite all the money they (globalist bankers, also the people behind the UN) stole from us all during the bailouts, it seems they aren't able to feed the world like we trusting socialist slaves expected them to. Oh well, looks like some people are just going to have to die, I guess it has to happen anyway to save the Earth...
Isn't this sick when the UN/WHO takes a trillion dollars to fund their new bank of the world, but can't put a few million towards feeding people? Of course, I didn't expect anything better from this kind of scum:
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world" - Henry Kissinger
Kissinger's population control agenda in action
Thursday, 30 July 2009
ABC News - Pregnant Women especially vulnerable to Swine Flu
Forgetting the fact that even pro-vaccine medical establishment types are wary of the dangers of vaccinating very young babies (see the recommended ages beyond which kids can be injected with the bioweapons here) and how the newfound urgency to vaccinate unborn children seems to present a strange paradox, let's move on to what one respondent said to that article:
I was in college in 1976 and we were all put through a line to get the Swine flu vaccine. We were strongly recommended to get the vaccination to stay in college and as an 18 year old did as I was told. I never did hear of a person at that college getting swine flu before or after the vaccination. Now 33 years later I wonder about this one. I probably need it this time as I have respiratory problems. Will it work, be safe no side effects , be available so that people don't panic like the flu shot a few years ago. Will it become a yearly thing like the flu shot. To many questions i guess
Well, fool you once, shame on them. Fool you twice, shame on you...
"You can fool some of the people all of the time" - Abraham Lincoln
If you read nothing else on the topic of vaccines, read this article (original source) which blows away the pro-vaccine arguments. Injection is not a natural route of entry into the body, which is a major reason why even 'clean vaccines' are harmful to the immune system. But since incidents occur such as Baxter putting live bird flu into vaccines, there's no guarantee of even that level of safety. Do you trust vaccine makers not to poison you, or at least not to check what is in their product to see if it might poison you?
The short answer is vaccine bad, no vaccine good. Your immune system needs strengthening, not weakening, so it may resist this manufactured virus and others.
Also, Obama poll numbers are sliding as the reasonable people who supported him realise, in ever-increasing numbers, that they have been defrauded.
Ron Paul discusses this with Alex Jones:
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
#1 - The vaccine production was "rushed" and the vaccine has never been tested on humans. Do you like to play guinea pig for Big Pharma? If so, line up for your swine flu vaccine this fall...
#2 - Swine flu vaccines contain dangerous adjuvants that cause an inflammatory response in the body. This is why they are suspected of causing autism and other neurological disorders.
#3 - The swine flu vaccine could actually increase your risk of death from swine flu by altering (or suppressing) your immune system response. There is zero evidence that even seasonal flu shots offer any meaningful protection for people who take the jabs. Vaccines are the snake oil of modern medicine.
#4 - Doctors still don't know why the 1976 swine flu vaccines paralyzed so many people. And that means they really have no clue whether the upcoming vaccine might cause the same devastating side effects. (And they're not testing it, either...)
#5 - Even if the swine flu vaccine kills you, the drug companies aren't responsible. The U.S. government has granted drug companies complete immunity against vaccine product liability. Thanks to that blanket immunity, drug companies have no incentive to make safe vaccines, because they only get paid based on quantity, not safety (zero liability).
#6 - No swine flu vaccine works as well as vitamin D to protect you from influenza. That's an inconvenient scientific fact that the U.S. government, the FDA and Big Pharma hope the people never realize.
#7 - Even if the swine flu vaccine actually works, mathematically speaking if everyone else around you gets the vaccine, you don't need one! (Because it can't spread through the population you hang with.) So even if you believe in the vaccine, all you need to do is encourage your friends to go get vaccinated...
#8 - Drug companies are making billions of dollars from the production of swine flu vaccines. That money comes out of your pocket -- even if you don't get the jab -- because it's all paid by the taxpayers.
#9 - When people start dying in larger numbers from the swine flu, rest assured that many of them will be the very people who got the swine flu vaccine. Doctors will explain this away with their typical Big Pharma logic: "The number saved is far greater than the number lost." Of course, the number "saved" is entirely fictional... imaginary... and exists only in their own warped heads.
#10 - The swine flu vaccine centers that will crop up all over the world in the coming months aren't completely useless: They will provide an easy way to identify large groups of really stupid people. (Too bad there isn't some sort of blue dye that we could tag 'em with for future reference...)
The lottery, they say, is a tax on people who can't do math. Similarly, flu vaccines are a tax on people who don't understand health.
But...but...it's so dangerous! Scary flu that was in no way manufactured. Think of all the lives that vaccines have saved; I mean, without vaccines, we wouldn't have had the chance to learn so much about autism. A breakthrough in medical developments!
Those who don't get a vaccine, nay three vaccines, are enemies of the state and a danger to those around them with their violation of the sacred code of Herd Immunity.
For more information on who is going to try and force three needles into your arm this year, see here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/026723_health_vaccines_immune_system.html - pay particular attention to the section called "Three stage vaccinations may create perfect cytokine storm" to be aware of the possibilities of using multiple vaccinations to kill someone in stages.
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Monday, 27 July 2009
The reason I am drawing your attention to this story is this: no focus is given to the fact that people are doing what they have to do to survive in that situation. If you read the article, without critical thinking, the 'logical' conclusion implied is that we need to let the humans starve so that the lions live. Bad people stealing meat to survive!
I can be pro-animal, but I draw the line at where 'pro-animal' becomes 'anti-human'. In situations of genuine need, and I see no reason why this is not a case of genuine need, humans are priority one in my opinion, every time.
What disturbs me about some of the top animal rights people, and I don't allow this to distract me from genuine animal concerns, are how many (Peter Singer being the prime example) are very anti-human. Singer actually said abortions could be carried out AFTER birth.
And then there's Dr Eric Pianka, in a league of his own. He and his followers view humanity as a plague on the Earth, and in his opinion the vast majority of humans need to be killed off to a 'sustainable' level. But on the other hand animals are so precious...oxymoronic stuff.
So the point is this. Animal welfare is a good cause just like, for example, womens' liberation was a good cause. But both of these causes are also exploited by the establishment to further their anti-human agenda of, in the case of womens' lib, breaking up the family so that everyone would grow up viewing the state as their family; and in the case of animal welfare/environmentalism, using that to justify population reduction, eugenics, and a general devaluing of human life.
Save the planet - kill yourself!
(yes that is a JOKE before I get sued...but if you want to see some people who aren't joking when they say that, then go here)
Friday, 24 July 2009
BBC - De Beers profits lose their gleam
Why am I picking on De Beers? 'Cause they are a Rothschild-connected company operating an aggressive monopoly on the diamond industry, and driving the price of diamonds far above their free market value by creating artificial scarcity. Not to mention that this controlled industry is a major factor behind many African wars (hence the term 'conflict diamonds' or 'blood diamonds').
This can be (fairly) easily found on a couple of Wikipedia articles, though only by implication. See what I mean:
After a brief stay with the Surveyor-General of Natal, Dr. P.C. Sutherland, in Pietermaritzburg, Rhodes took an interest in agriculture and joined his brother Herbert on his cotton farm in the Umkomaas valley in Natal. In the colony, he established the Rhodes Fruit Farms in the Stellenbosch district. In October 1871, Rhodes left the colony for the diamond fields of Kimberley. Financed by N M Rothschild & Sons, Rhodes achieved a virtual monopoly in the diamond mining industry, Rothschild also profiting on the yield from the future exploitation. He supervised the working of his brother's claim and speculated on his behalf. Among his associates in the early days were John X. Merriman and Charles Rudd, who later became his partner in the De Beers Mining Company and Niger Oil Company. After he first came to Africa, Rhodes supported himself with money lent by his aunt Sophia. 
Cecil Rhodes, who fraudulently purchased De Beers from the De Beer brothers, got his start by renting water pumps to miners during the diamond rush that started in 1871, when a 83.5 carat diamond was found on Colesburg Kopje (present day Kimberley), South Africa. He invested the profits of this operation into buying up claims of small mining operators, with his operations soon expanding into a separate mining company. De Beers Consolidated Mines was formed in 1888 by the merger of the companies of Barney Barnato and Cecil Rhodes, by which time the company was the sole owner of all diamond mining operations in the country. In 1889, Rhodes negotiated a strategic agreement with the London-based Diamond Syndicate, which agreed to purchase a fixed quantity of diamonds at an agreed price, thereby regulating output and maintaining prices. The agreement soon proved to be very successful - for example during the trade slump of 1891-1892, supply was simply curtailed to maintain the price. Rhodes was concerned about the break up of the new monopoly, stating to shareholders in 1896 that:
"Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all." (What 'anti-capitalists' don't understand is that the free market would often destroy unethical corporations like De Beers; in fact, their very existence depends on restraining market forces.)
In 1902, a competitive mine named the Cullinan Mine was discovered, however its owner refused to join the De Beers cartel. Instead, the mine started selling to a pair of independent dealers named Bernard and Ernest Oppenheimer. Production soon equalled all of the De Beers mines combined, as well as yielding the largest diamond ever discovered—the Cullinan Diamond. Ernest Oppenheimer was appointed the local agent for the powerful London Syndicate, rising to the position of mayor of Kimberley within 10 years. He understood the core principle that underpinned De Beer's success, stating in 1910 that:
"Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production"
In World War I, the Cullinan Mine was finally absorbed into De Beers.
Oppenheimer was very concerned about the discovery of diamonds in 1908 in German South West Africa, fearing that the increased supply would swamp the market and force prices down.
(Just read this section, the last line is GOLDEN...)
De Beers policy in the 1990s, which applied to all of Africa, was only to buy those diamonds that were legitimately traded and that it believed were not used to fund rebel groups, although as a leader in the industry they came under scrutiny and were widely believed to be a prominent dealer of conflict diamonds. In 1999, in line with a zero-tolerance policy, De Beers stopped all outside buying of diamonds in order to guarantee categorically the conflict-free status of De Beers diamonds.
In December 2000, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a landmark resolution supporting the creation of an international certification scheme for rough diamonds. By November 2002, negotiations between governments, the international diamond industry and civil society organisations resulted in the creation of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS). The KPCS sets out the requirements for controlling rough diamond production and trade. The KPCS became effective in 2003.
De Beers states that 100% of the diamonds it now sells are conflict-free and that all De Beers diamonds are purchased in compliance with national law, the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme and its own Diamond Best Practice Principles. The Kimberley process has helped restore the reputation of the industry, as well as eliminating sources of excess supply.
Yep, that's right, the propaganda film Blood Diamond was just that - propaganda (mixed in with what was overall a really good film about, well, a blood diamond). The Kimberley Process wasn't about stopping the trade of 'conflict diamonds', it was about shutting down De Beers' competition and maintaining their stranglehold over the diamond industry.
"Excess supply" is their way of describing the free market output of diamonds, which seemingly would lead to massive reductions in diamond prices to their natural level - in other words, diamonds aren't as precious or rare as we are told. They are as rare and precious as De Beers can make them seem to be!
De Beers - Creating Artificial Diamond Scarcity
Now go out and buy that big rock. Go on. It's really rare and valuable, just like the seller says, honest...
Thursday, 23 July 2009
(Images: Israeli youngsters learn to use Uzis. British youngsters learn to quiver at the very thought of them.)
Our media is desperate to portray a one-sided view on guns, though I believe there are millions of people in Britain that would support recognition of a person's sovereign right to personal defence.
The following was written by an apparently British commenter to this post at The Volokh Conspiracy:
Knowing what I do of my fellow subjects, doubtless there are a not insignificant number of Brits sneering at the US right now. "Oh look at them shooting each other. The animals. Thankfully WE wouldn't have that problem. WE'VE been so clever and got rid of guns." Clever? Really? Let's say that there were no guns in Dodge ...or London. The police are gone. Electric and gas are off and will be for weeks. There has been no fresh water for days so people will soon* start dying of thirst. You have no idea how far the damage extends or how long help might take and drug adicts are already frantic, desperate for a fix. In short, all bets on reasonable behaviour are off. So tell me, my scoffing, condescending friend, who is it has the power now? This is so simple even Muppets Against Guns should be able to figure it out, so come on. Is it the young or old? the male or female? the big or small? the most aggressive or most respectful? the normally law abiding or the practised law breaker? That's right! The most powerful people would be young, aggressive, muscular males who are experienced in fights, especially ones with friends like themselves. i.e. gang members. Not exactly the kind of people you want in charge when the next few days will be a struggle for your very survival.
In New Orleans, women, older and weaker citizens, and those who are sick, injured or on their own, can rely on their trusty shotguns to keep them *relatively* safe. No chance of that in the UK. One major disaster and thanks to the smug, the ignorant, the sneering and the downright deceitful, it will, quite literally, be survival of the fittest. With many areas deserted, others cut off by flood water so foul that no-one with any sense would be in it and fires, smoke and noise all around to cover any misdeeds, you'd really need to watch your back. And your front. Not easy when you've been four days with no food, water or sleep. Been a bit miserable once, EVER, to that little thug down the street. Not looking like such a good idea now, is it? What about that time you lied to the court about your ex-husband. Uh-oh! Or you refused to tip that waiter that time? Oops! Oh, and fancy a bit of action gentlemen? the women are there for the taking. And when you're finished simply render her unconscious and throw her out for the alligators/dogs to eat the evidence. Might I suggest you start with a gun banning feminist or two? T'will be all the sweeter!
Thomas Jefferson said of the American 2nd Amendment: "It will not be needed until they try to take it". I believe gun rights in Britain will not be demanded until they are needed - hopefully it will be sooner rather than later, but it WILL happen. It is a necessary consequence of out of control crime, poverty and tyranny (the globalist-sponsored hat-trick coming down on us like a ton of freshly printed million pound hyperinflationary notes).
Right now people believe they are safe and don't need the dangers associated with having firearms in the neighbourhood. Tomorrow they will reap what their anti-gun utopian fantasies have sown, and it won't be a pretty harvest.
"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Natural News - Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder
Who is Jane Burgermeister?
"Jane, briefly, is an Austrian journalist, she filed criminal charges against the WHO, the UN, and several high-ranking government and corporate officials concerning what she is considering bioterrorism. She filed the charges with the FBI and she was also [as a result] fired from her job as European Correspondent to the Renewable Energy World website."
- Taken from the introduction to Jane Burgermeister's interview with Project Camelot (Part 1 below):
Jane Burgermeister's blog http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/
Her actions, giving up her career in order to help expose what the eugenicists-in-chief are doing, are commendable. Thank you Ms Burgermeister.
Monday, 20 July 2009
Daily Mail - Tory superbank: Osborne to scrap watchdog and give Bank of England powers to stop meltdown
The Bank of England will become a 'superbank' with unparalleled powers to prevent another financial meltdown under Tory plans announced today.
In a historic move, the Conservatives will give the Bank sweeping controls to regulate banks and building societies.
The plans are Shadow Chancellor George Osborne's attempt to seize the mantle of reform from Gordon Brown, who granted the Bank independence to set interest rates when Labour won power in 1997.
The Tories will complete the revolution by handing it control of curbing bubbles in the housing market and consumer debt, clamping down on obscene City bonuses, and preventing future financial implosions.
"curbing bubbles in the housing market" LOL! Perhaps the typist made a little mistake and they meant to say 'causing', as is the real case?
Also, I love how it is treated as a coincidence that the BoE got 'independence' to dictate interest rates 12 years ago and since we have seen nothing but a huge credit bubble inflate and then burst. Oops! Better give the same people more power then.
Problem - Greed, bonuses, corruption, bailouts, waste, sense of economic injustice
Reaction - "We need to do something about the greedy bankers, they can't be trusted on their own"
Solution - We unleash banker-controlled regulators on everyone, to 'stop the bankers from misbehaving'. Thankfully we have a central bank (which is in no way owned by the same bankers who are to be 'regulated'), so our nation has a stable economy... (Whew! Imagine how dangerous a free market would be.)
Even if you are for more regulation and so on (I think outlawing fractional reserve practices and implementing sound monetary systems would be best), this isn't more oversight or accountability - it's LESS. Letting the bankers regulate themselves as they create money from nothing? Good idea, I can see that working...
It is fairly simple really. The road to hell is paved with the good, but misguided, intentions of the ordinary people, intentions that are carefully and covertly crafted by a few bankers, politicians and media heads.
This particular genius policy is being sold to us by Tory Shadow Chancellor George Osborne, a Bilderberg attendee. Enjoy, serfs.
Sunday, 19 July 2009
Russia-China warn US that Israeli attack on Iran means 'World War'
(Image: There are various estimates, but it is generally agreed upon that over 50 million people were killed during the Second World War.)
There's little doubt that the Israeli government is wanting to attack Iran. They have a fair amount of popular support for such an action from their own people and from the Americans, despite Iran not actually doing anything. (No, really, Israel can have tons of secret nukes but Iran can't even try to build them?)
All warfare is based on deception. (Sun Tzu)
Russia is, quite rightly in my opinion, uneasy with Western geopolitical operations of both the military and political variety, which have in recent years given them the impression of being surrounded.
China is China, and they would love a war to take their enslaved peoples' minds off of the fact that they are slaves.
Likewise, I am afraid, in the 'democratic' dictatorships of the West.
So, are you looking forward to the prospect of a world war? Who knows, maybe they will forego the customary nukes.
To be honest, I don't believe the elites of the West, Russia or China would be too attracted by the idea of a world war between nuclear powers, the implications of which might well unseat them.
Or maybe the whole world will be destroyed, but historically even in the most tense situations (such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and Able Danger 83) the fingers of all parties have stayed off the nuclear buttons.
Maybe a major, but proxy (Cold War style) conflict is brewing in which the West backs Israel (possibly alongside US-occupied Iraq) and the East backs the Arab states led by Iran.
And Mr Rothschild lends both sides the funds they need to do some population reduction...at 30% compound interest of course.
Saturday, 18 July 2009
Infowars - Shills for the Fed
The second link will display all the comments on one page. Honestly, I don't think there's even ten in 170+ that support the sentiment of the petition.
This is good news, and shows the issue of central banks and the nature of money, is transcending normal political divisions. Austrian School economics is shunned by the 'mainstream' politicians and economists, and people who identify with that theory are considered fringe or kooky, as evidenced by the Wikipedia entry on Austrian School theory.
But even if you love Keynesianism and think it's the best thing in the world ever, you can't ignore the problems posed by having central banks unaccountable to anyone showering their inside friends with money backed only by the general population and their children.
Hey, they can pay more taxes!
Hey, they can put up with their currency being devalued!
Ron Paul on Austrian vs Keynesian Economics
Keynesianism's Last Stand
Methinks your centuries-old scam of 'money changing' is in danger, Illuminist bankers. What is your next move? Try and sell a global currency on the basis that, for now, it's in gold? I'm not sure. You could of course give up now :D
Friday, 17 July 2009
They say they just put in a new comments system (now you register with them and login to post a comment), which I believe was introduced at a very convenient time! Perhaps too convenient. And even with the precious new system, no reason exists to remove what was already there. Unless of course you are a Rupert Murdoch-owned propaganda outfit...
Original Times article about swine flu vaccine
Anyway, now the comments function is back up. Aww, bless. And the public can still be warned by real citizens about the danger the vaccines pose.
Liberty or death, what we so proudly hail
once you provoke her, rattling of her tail
never begins it, never, but once engaged...
never surrenders, showing the fangs of rage
said don't tread on me
so be it
threaten no more
to secure peace is to prepare for war
so be it
settle the score
touch me again for the words that you'll hear evermore...
don't tread on me
love it or leave it, she with the deadly bite
quick is the blue tongue, forked as a lightning strike
shining with brightness, always on surveillance
the eyes they never close, emblem of vigilance
said don't tread on me
Also forget not their video to "All Nightmare Long" (2008) that includes references to chemtrails.
CNS News - Health Care Bill Will Fund State Vaccine Teams to Conduct ‘Interventions’ in Private Homes
There is a knock at the front door. Peeking through the window, a mother sees a man and a woman, both in uniform. They are agents of health-care reform.
“Excuse me, ma’am,” says the man. “Our records show that your eleven-year-old daughter has not been immunized for genital warts.”
“And your four-year-old still needs the chicken-pox vaccine,” says the woman.
“He will not be allowed to start kindergarten unless he gets that shot, you know,” says the man—smiling from ear to ear.
“So, can we please come in?” asks the woman. “We have the vaccines right here,” she says, lifting up a black medical bag. “We can give your kids the shots right now.”
“We are from the government,” says the man, “and we’re here to help.”
Is this a scene from the over-heated imagination of an addlepated conspiracy theorist? Or is it something akin to what is actually envisioned by the health-care reform bill approved this week by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee.
Read more if you can stomach it without throwing your computer across the room
But government loves me so much...yeah, like an abusive husband 'loves' his wife.
Thursday, 16 July 2009
Why is this likely? Well...http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=2078
In the meantime, sheeple, get ready to scramble like your life depends on it for the limited-availablity vaccines (ever heard of the effects of artificial scarcity and vicarious reinforcement?), and enjoy this:
Oh, and you can teach your kids the merits of vaccines by buying them a Brio UNICEF immunization toy set. So they can learn how vaccines protect them from the nasty viruses. Ahem.
As the article says, having to hire people to put forth your propaganda is a clear sign the balance of opinion is turned very much against you.
When over 1600 soldiers have refused to fight beyond the 1967 border with Palestine, you know your Zioccupation is losing popular support...
The good guys - Israeli soldiers refusing to operate in Palestinian Territories. It's easy to get bogged down and label an entire group of people as being bad, when in fact there is no shortage of good people in Israel, just as there is in Iran, for example. It's the governments that are the problem, not the people.
Courage to Refuse
Refuser Solidarity Network
Click here to read the "Combatant's Letter" (written by veterans of the IDF about why they oppose the Occupation of Palestine).
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
(If you hadn't read them, the majority of respondents were against the vaccine, many citing that it will be used as a weapon to harm or kill the sorry suckers who take it.)
Health Care in a Free Society: Rebutting the Myths of National Health Insurance
I, thankfully, don't have any lengthy experience with my nation's socialised medical system yet. But the general consensus is that it has a lot of problems with waiting times (improving on this one), availability of resources (getting worse with people having to go further to get treatments), and many other things, as the CATO numbers point out.
Also see -
The Ron Paul approach to healthcare
Obama's Health Reform >>> Nazi Euthanasia?
Tuesday, 14 July 2009
Chuck Norris calls for Fed transparency, supports HR 1207
Ron Paul: "Fed Independence is codeword for Secrecy"
REBELLION AGAINST VACCINES:
Times: Swine Flu Vaccine Rushed Through Safety Checks (read the opinions of those responding!)
Infowars: Brits Tell Goons with Needles to Stick It Where Sun Don't Shine
I don't know much. I don't know if the shot will kill millions or thousands or if it will be essentially harmless or if it won't go ahead at all. I do know this: I'm not taking it!
Age of Autism's "Warranty of Vaccine Safety for Pediatricians"
THAT SHADOWY BOGEYMAN OSAMA BIN LADEN:
WRH: Osama Bin Laden a dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government
welfarestate.com: If Bin Laden was dead, would the US admit it? (read the Egyptian news report discussing Osama's apparent funeral)
The guy was frail and on dialysis, he's in all likelihood dead after eight years. It's like people who say Hitler was still alive after May 1945, well, if he was then he wouldn't have lived long anyway since he probably had Parkinson's Disease. So it's very likely, whether or not this report of Osama's funeral being in Dec 2001 is true, that the big bogeyman is long dead.
Thursday, 9 July 2009
The term 'Team GB' refers to the British Olympic team. Our Olympic team is a source of national pride, especially following their unprecedented success in Beijing last year. For a nation such as ours, to come fourth in the world (behind only the superpowers of China, the USA and Russia) is quite an acheivement.
So to use the mantra 'Team GB' to refer to your pathetic 'Team Green Britain' environmentalist propaganda advertising, is an insult.
Especially when the agenda behind the hype is the destruction of self-governing nations including the one whose flag you have defaced to use in your propaganda.
(Just to be clear, I support the use of flags in a non-conventional manner when the intent behind doing so is one of saving the nation in question, but when you are in the process of destroying it, then I'm not so tolerant.)
The only way to save Britain now is to dump these environmentalist brainwashed fools and the disgusting EU overboard. We held off the Spanish Armada but we can't stop bureaucrats from bossing us around? Please.
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
Why is it we were fed constant updates on the protesting in Iran, in which unfortunately a handful of people were killed, but when the Chinese cut down over a hundred Uighur seperatist protestors, we barely hear a peep from MSM-land?
Could it be that Iran isn't a slave state to the New World Order, while China is? Maybe that would explain the media coverage, or lack thereof.
(Besides, paedophile Michael Jackson's funeral is, like, totally more important)
Monday, 6 July 2009
Those Guardsmen must be freaking out; they are being perpared for war with the very people they are supposed to be protecting. This isn't a rare case, either - such drills have been going on for years (see Police State 2000 for similar drills).
Are you a militia insurgent? Signs you may be one:
- You have a gun (oh! how dangerous of you)
- You prefer the Declaration of Independence to the Patriot Act
- You spread dangerous anti-government sentiments, brainwashing others into your militia cult that says freedom means less government, when we all know that more government means more freedom!
But it really is all quiet on the Western Front.
Britain isn't showing any signs yet of the 'summer of rage' forecasted by police, and the American Tea Parties, though getting some attention, are still relatively low-key.
Though, you have to give the establishment credit - they are trying everything they can to make people angry all of a sudden. I have taken note of this change in the subliminal and overt nature of my TV news recently, with the incessant focusing in on the expenses scandal (which is acting as a distraction to the £1 trillion or more we have given to the banks, by the way). It has been done in such a way as to make the viewer as angry as possible, if you ask me.
What is that supposed to acheive? I don't know. Generally the manipulators of society rely on making people less angry (hence the fluoridation of water, the emphasis on nonviolence, etc), but now all of a suuden they want people to get mad, but not over the real things like bailouts and the monetary system, no, we'll lose it over Jacqui Smith's husband charging us for a porn film.
The establishment wants violence to kick off ASAP so that they can make martial law seem justified both to the goodthinking proles and to the troops who are supposed to be staring down a barrel at their own citizens. This is why they're trying to drum up a fight, after decades of conditioning the people to be domesticated, castrated slaves (which, ironically, is why it's so hard for them to cause sudden unrest).
I am not saying that rebellion isn't a good thing, just that if you care for freedom, perhaps it's important to appreciate which actions will or will not play into the establishment's hands. Don't do what they want you to do.
The handful of inbred scum inhabiting our financial systems today are very scared of you, more so than you ever could be of them or their political/legal/military minions, because at least you are justified in your actions while they never can possess that resolve.
I know nothing of war or revolution, save that it is a last resort, especially when we are considering a mass of unorganised people under opression from a government that many do not understand is opressive. Education is the weapon of choice right now - Information Warfare in the digital era.
But seriously, if black skimasks come to take you to some funny camp, do what you have to do.
And remember: at Lexington Green, the soldiers of the Empire, not the Patriots, fired first.
Sunday, 5 July 2009
When I first read about this I believed it was a fake. No, it's true - a group called "Shot Fairy" gives kids vaccinations in their sleep.
Taken from their homepage:
Shotfairy.com was founded with one mission in mind: to provide you and your family with safe and convenient vaccinations in the comfort of your home. Our service, currently offered in the South Loop and Beverly neighborhoods of Chicago, Illinois, is designed to ensure the health and safety of your entire family. We offer vaccinations for adults and children. Parents especially appreciate Shotfairy.com’s “sleep time service” where our licensed nurses administer vaccines while your child is sleeping, thereby helping you and your child avoid the pain and anxiety associated with office vaccinations.
And read the description of "Nurse Peggy McKeever". It ends:
Nurse McKeever now vaccinates all of her children and many of her nieces and nephews at home while they sleep.
(Presumably with parental consent of course! Just, the way it's worded, it sounds like injecting sleeping children is an enjoyable pastime for Nurse McKeever.)
The predatory nature of this disgusting operation is mind-boggling. I guess, as someone said in response to the Examiner article on this, they don't have the heart to look the kid in the eye as they shoot them up with mercury.
It truly is a Brave New World, isn't it.
Saturday, 4 July 2009
Hypothetical example of usage:
One million Iraqis have died, directly or indirectly due to the US-led regime change and occupation in Iraq - and the justification for going into a war that killed 4000+ coalition troops has been proven to be entirely fabricated.
Typical blame America first liberal. This is America, don't like it then get the hell out, move to Europe, Commie!
Typical blame America first liberal. This assumes that:
(1) The person citing credible facts about the Iraq war is a 'liberal'. This is central to the modern bending of the definition of 'liberal', which ironically has allowed socialists to move in under the verbal camouflage provided by so-called 'liberalism'.
(2) That person, because they are citing credible facts and opposing the military will of their government, hates their country.
(3) That any and all 'liberals' and anti-war people hate their country. In fact, more broadly, anyone who is against the will of their government, hates their country. Interesting logical premise.
"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government" - Ed Abbey
This is America. This claim seems to say that:
(1) Endless war is America.
(2) Blind conformity is America.
(3) Asking soldiers to risk their lives in obscure lands, because the government says so, is America.
...don't like it then get the hell out, move to Europe, Commie! Apart from this being incredibly naive, it also suggests:
(1) You have a privilege, not a right, to live in America. The privilege is granted based on how compliant and 'grateful' you are to your government for the freedom you have (despite that process being an extreme denial of freedom).
(2) You're letting down the great cause of America, which is to spread 'freedom' around the world, and kill all tyrants. Freedom can be spread only with your compliance. (Orwellian doublethink 'freedom', of course.)
(3) European nations are run by Commies. Can't argue with that - but if you want to find some real Commies, look no further than your own pro-war neoconservatives and their origins.
Support the war? Some tough questions you still need to answer:
How can you profess to support the troops, and claim that supporting the war is supporting the troops, when the most popular Presidential candidate (by donations) amongst the troops, was the anti-Empire Ron Paul...perhaps the troops want the war to end, do they get your support with that?
If many of the troops don't want to fight, surely the fight in question is not justified or worth the sacrifice we selfishly demand from the troops?
What would the Founding Fathers have said about the Iraq or Afghan wars, or the likely new one in Pakistan? Be honest.
I think I have some answers to that last one.
"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none." - Thomas Jefferson
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - James Madison
Homeland Security was never for the scary 'Al-Qaeda', the Islamic branch of the CIA. It's for you and all the other ordinary slaves-to-be.
So, who really blames America first? Anti-war people, who criticise the expensive Empire and unnecessary wars which are contributing to tax increases and domestic tyranny, or pro-war people, who blame American traditional values about non-interventionism every time they decide they want to start another war? Hmm.
I respect America for the principles it was founded upon; the notion that man may best govern himself, and among other ideas, the creed of non-interventionism. In that sense, the people of the world are brought together by ideals that have been, to date, best realised in the United States. Nobody hates that America, though the people of the world - including most Americans themselves - are aware that today's America is a force of global opression and Empire (with troops in most countries in the world).
This knowledge could easily lead to anti-American sentiments, which I would say are, overall, justified. But if someone says to me that America is evil, I would respond that today's "America" is not the America that was a spearhead of liberty back in the 18th and 19th centuries. It has been seized by European-based Banksters, who took it over in 1913 with their "Federal" Reserve racket, and have been slowly bringing about the destruction of America ever since, by getting it into huge sums of debt.
And as we can see, nothing racks up great national debt quite like warfare. All those interest payments billed to the taxpayer...
"War is just a racket...I believe in adequate defenses at the coastline and nothing else." - Gen. Smedley Butler
As I write this, the last minutes of 4th July tick away over here. A day to consider not what America is, but what America was - and thanks to today's revolutionaries, what it will one day be again.
Thursday, 2 July 2009
Norway has 23 cases of so-called 'Swine' flu. It is regular flu. You get it. You sneeze. You cough. Maybe you need some extra rest. Unfortunately it sometimes kills off people who have other health problems, as do other kinds of regular flu.
Norway Post article (via Infowars)
The Norwegian health authorities will this fall begin a program of mass vaccination against the A H1N1 flu, also called the swine flu. A total of 9.4 million doses have been ordered from the suppliers.
All will be given two innoculations, two weeks apart, Bergens Tidende reports. The total cost will be NOK 650 million.
So far, only 23 cases of the flu has been diagnosed in Norway, but the authorities expect that the number will increase.
I'm speculating that the first mass vaccination won't be particularly harmful (though I'm not willing to put that thesis to the test myself of course!) and it will get the masses to view anti-vaccine people as more 'crazy' than they already do.
"See? That forced vaccine didn't kill anybody, liar! It protected us!"
But once people have doublethought their way to accepting mandatory vaccinations, oh boy then the killing can begin. Think I'm kidding? I hope I'm wrong. Are you willing to stake your life on me being wrong? Even if the vaccines were the best thing ever, there is no moral or lawful argument for them being compulsory. But who needs morals or laws when you're commanded by a satanic Illuminist cult, right? I think it goes something like this:
Have you had this month's round of shots? No? Guards! Quarantine! Quarantine! That man is endangering those around him with his lack of contribution to Herd Immunity!
Sir, you're a danger to the public. Your vaccine refusal is treason against the power monopoly of the state, I'm referring you to the special camps-er-'detaining facilities', where we keep terrorist vaccine refusers and those troublemaker sovereign citizens.
Before Jim Jones got his followers to drink the lethal cyanide, he made them do drill after drill to commit mass suicide, to acclimate them to the process. That form of conditioning is on display today for pandemics, quarantines, and mass vaccinations.
You Vill Obey Ze Fuhrer's Vord!
The second most powerful man in Nazi Germany, Martin Bormann, was a "Soviet" (i.e. Illuminati British) agent who ensured the destruction of both Germany and European Jewry. Thus, he advanced two of the Illuminati's main goals: integrate Germany into a world government by annihilating its national, cultural and racial pretensions, and establish Israel as the Masonic bankers' world capital by threatening European Jews with extinction.
Martin Bormann was Rothschild agent - damning evidence
So, if you are thinking that taking a flu vaccine is a good thing, perhaps you should read this first.
(credit to Zombie America)
My opinion: no, don't take the shot, refuse it any way possible!
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
And don't say that they wouldn't do it, because they have been caught doing this before, with SAS commandos dressed as Arabs driving around shooting at Iraqi police.
War, it seems, is a racket. Who knew?
- ► 2010 (647)
- National ID card a 'no brainer' says home secretary
- World Food Programme short on funds
- Give pregnant women a swine flu shot
- Federal Reserve approval falling: new poll
- H1N1 vaccine: 10 things you're not supposed to know
- 1993 Cartoon Depicts Chip Implantation
- People scavenging meat from wild lions...poor lion...
- Poor De Beers losing profits (sob)
- Gerald Celente: Gold, Frankenfoods, Obamageddon
- Pro-Gun in UK: Dying Breed or Silent Masses?
- Jane Burgermeister
- Conservatives will 'save' economy by licking BoE b...
- How would you like a world war?
- The People shoot down pro-Fed economists
- More on the Times removing Flu article comments
- Metallica - Don't Tread On Me
- Inoculation Squads at your door!
- Swine Flu "Cultured in a Laboratory"
- Israeli Govt hires pro-Israel Talkbackers
- Times scrubs comments from Flu Vaccine article
- The Day It Rained Jelly
- Let CATO settle the healthcare debate
- Stuff to read
- Corporate Environmentalists Defacing our Flag
- Liberty Activist pays property taxes in $1 bills
- But we don't hear about China
- Beating the Drums
- Vaccinating Children While They Sleep
- Blame America First
- Forced Vaccinations in Norway
- Illuminati, Nazis, hidden history
- Educate Before You Vaccinate
- US paid Afghan militants to destabilise Iraq...
- ▼ Jul 2009 (33)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)