Thursday, 30 September 2010
However, no matter what you think of weed, you've got to be honest and admit that there are many many more dangerous drugs that are completely legal. How about the biggest drug of them all, refined sugar. Not mentioned in the video but that is possibly the most dangerous 'abused substance' of all due to its ubiquitousness. I'm not addicted to sugar, I could give up any time I want.
Okay how's about taking heroin addicts and giving them methadone, an even more dangerous drug, as a 'treatment'. Rockefeller drug dealing. Well they won't be addicted to heroin anymore I guess! Jeremy Kyle, my British readers will know him, he means well but he is always telling heroin addicts to get on a methadone project, which frankly is about as helpful as throwing water on a chip pan fire.
The state should just get it over with, admit they are doing most of the drug running and pull up big army trucks full of CIA's Finest Colombian outside schools and just hand it out.
But they don't need to do that, they can diagnose the children with some non-disorder like ADHD and force them to take the addictive, deadly Ritalin, which is basically a legal form of cocaine, sort of. If they didn't have behavioural problems before, they will now!
To the people who want to keep drugs away from society by banning them - I understand, and I am extremely anti-drug in regards to personal preference (and that goes for all drugs including things not usually recognised as such), but making them illegal only allows the state-cartel axis to control the profitable market for drugs, and the corrupt police to lord it over everyone else, planting drugs on people, expanding their power to 'fight drugs', etc.
The real and only solution - one which no amount of authoritarianism can make up for - is to have an educated, informed, and spiritually and mentally 'armed' populace who will be capable of avoiding coming under the control of any addictive drug, whether it's being pushed by illegal drug dealers, legal drug 'retailers', or prescription drug dealers aka 'doctors'. No doubt sometimes medical drugs do help but often they just end up killing people slowly.
Legalise all drugs and you remove the profit incentive for this corrupt state-cartel drug mafia to continue poisoning society. No longer can they use the police to go after their market competitors.
Think of all the ordinary kids who have been arrested for drug possession, then got raped in prison and become (Masonic) gang members, and then come out of there hardcore lifetime criminals. What a waste, and all due to the insane drug laws. Makes the government funded prison industry very rich though huh?
Oh yeah, and Pearl Harbor...well...we know the US government was breaking all Japanese codes from well before PH happened, and we know that oddly all US aircraft carriers were out at sea just leaving the useless old battleships to be destroyed, and due to PH US public opinion swayed away from the America Firsters (Noninterventionists) and towards Throne of David Firsters (Interventionists), ah isn't history wonderful? A little repetitive sometimes.
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
Like these three for example. Oh, they're not lying to you. Like in satanic ritual (so it is said), it's more powerful if the subject is made aware of what's being done to them but still submits to it anyway.
Smirking little bastards that wrote those articles.
Greenspan says Fed above law
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
This time his lackey (or not?) goes one better and says Mossad was involved, which is blatantly true but nonetheless...
No you aren't a real boy Mahmoud. You seem to be a provocateur. Why all of a sudden come out now and speak closer to the truth about 9/11? It's been nine years, and you certainly are not bothered about taboos, since you have your Holocaust Revision conferences.
I am not fooled by the Muslims who want us to believe that the Zionist entity is the only obstacle to peace, and that Muslims are just lovely angels who need a hug.
I am not a Muslim hugger.
However, the Ayranian people seem to be generally alright and so it is a shame to see them suffer under Crypto Ahmadinejad and the brutal Abrahamic tyranny of Islam.
Yet at the same time the only thing worse than Mahmoud, is the other guy who the CIA's "Green Movement" wanted to put in place, the Shah 2.0 you could call him.
See, this is how hard it is to unpick all the lies due to the Hegelian mindfuck that we live under.
So why, Mahmoud, and why now, start talking about 9/11?
Do you want us to believe you are truly anti NWO and not just Hitler type controlled opposition intended to lead us into WW3 initially between Iran/Israel?
Not buying it.
Talk about the square mile and I'll be compelled to believe you however.
Fight the Rothschilds like Hitler didn't have the balls* to.
The one good thing about Islamic law is it forbids usury, but even that means nothing when there are Iranian people to exploit. Right Mahmoud? I mean at least Hitler printed his own debt free money, like Lincoln did, which does not undo their other great crimes but at least leaves one good thing that can be said wrt them. Can't say the same for Ahmadinejad. Although he hasn't started a war like Lincoln or Hitler. Yet.
At least the Iranians' Press TV does tell us more of the truth than Al Jizzear which is even more into that pro-Muslim-lefty vein of thought, which I believe is cultivated to encourage Europeans to welcome their new old Muzzie overlords, bloody grey squirrels have been pushing back Europe for centuries. Not that I do not support the movement for freeing Palestine, because I do, but at the same time let Jews have Israel (1967 borders), and recompensate Palestinians who lost land in the forming of Israel, bring all our troops out of the ME, and let Muslims have Arabia, not Europe!
* sorry I couldn't resist. lol
BBCW explains all...
The international usury money scam is centuries, millennia old. The Bank of England, HQ of the NWO global finance manipulation, is three hundred years old. This modern incarnation with wholly fictional money is only decades old. The only way out is to either kill the central bank like Andrew Jackson did, and outlaw usury, or surrender unto them everything we have and live under perpetual slavery.
It's really rather simple.
Saturday, 25 September 2010
It was teachers who were forced to report these incidents. How on earth do the teachers go along with this crap.
(don't tell me you haven't heard of Wonder Showzen, lol!)
I would like to see a breakdown by ethnicity, of a) the children who were reported for racism, and b) the reported victim of racism.
"The more we seek to measure racism, the more it seems to grow".
Sounds like a social construct designed to control the indigenous.
Anyway, leave it to a decent black guy to tell the truth. Good for him. Black people are used as political pawns by the Marxists, and are expected to embrace the victim mentality they have been assigned. Even black people (never mind any others) who dare breach this victim paradigm, however, are often labeled 'self hating' by the Marxists, and shamed for supposedly being 'part of the problem' (the racism problem) and having an 'old fashioned worldview'.
Nothing old fashioned about having an authentic attitude though. Can't be a black victim - or indeed a groveling white wreck - all your life, as the Marxists would like for you.
Friday, 24 September 2010
Many people are aware of the Hegelian process by which public opinion has been shaped throughout history. That is, if you control both the thesis and the antithesis, you can 'lead' the unsuspecting member of the public towards a predetermined synthesis, a controlled outcome.
This is most apparent in the political clash of left wing and right wing. To spot what the agenda, the planned synthesis, really is, you must look NOT at what they disagree on - but what they AGREE on.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a Iew. Like the English and Saudi royals are. Crypto of course.
As usual, it's not what they disagree on, but what they agree on that counts. And so I give you...
Note that within a couple of paragraphs the article veers off into talking about how stupid Americans are?
And note that Ahmadinejad blames the US (aka Great Satan) for 9/11.
The common bond breaching this Hegelian false conflict.
USA is being dismantled by design, and as goes America so goes the West. China is the new British Empire; America has been used, a necessary evil to TPTB, and is now being thrown away.
The perpetrators of 9/11 and 7/7 were MI6-Mossad-CIA, and that is a hierachial order IMO. The AAA, like I said. Saying America did 9/11 is like saying Britain did 7/7. Partly true, but kind of misleading.
There are a lot of paralells between Ahmadinejad and Hitler, in truth. The real Hitler I mean, not the fake pop culture six million version. Both are controlled opposition, Pied Pipers. Look at what Hitler brought upon the Germans. I just hope that Mahmoud doesn't provide pseudo-justification for similar atrocities against the Ayranian people, who by and large like the Germans just want to live free in their own country, as far as I an tell. (There is no persecution of Jews in Iran; if there was they would want to leave, but they don't. Although the first paragraph of this gave me a chuckle nonetheless. Oh I believe that wholeheartedly. Such poysecution.)
But then the Iraqis and Afghans, as many faults as they no doubt may have, also just wanted to be left alone, didn't they. Hell, people in Europe want nothing more than that, but they have the EU shafting them with their bureaucratic nonsense and free trade/open border policies.
So anyway, that's my take on Ahmadinejad. Provocateur, saboteur, trouble maker, small time tyrant. But hey at least he is no longer saying that 19 alcohol drinking, radical Muslim Saudis led by Donkey Kong Osama bin Laden, did 9/11. That is an even stupider and false thing to say.
Part 1 / 2 / 3
btw interesting fleur de lis shirt Alex. Loyal to the royal huh?
From A China Traveler by David Rockefeller, 1973
See, Che is only for wannabe Commies. Che wasn't half the Commie Mao was. Mao was a real hardcore Liberator Of The Proletariat.
And of course there is nothing Commie about the education system, just those paranoid idiots and their Communist Conspiracy theories.
Also why is it that so many Commie or left-anarchist type kids, despite often being nice people, are mentally defunct? Don't tell me you haven't noticed. John Dewey you have some explaining to do.
"One is very pleased with your work of bringing those ghastly States under our Communist rule, Mr Soetero."
It's bad enough that they gut the middle class and anyone who is rich but not part of their little cult. But there is nothing lower, more depraved, than stealing from the poorest.
Bono's ONE foundation under fire for giving little over 1% of funds to charity
Bono's anti-poverty foundation ONE is under pressure to explain its finances after it was revealed that only a small percentage of money it raises reaches the needy.
The non-profit organisation set up by the U2 frontman received almost £9.6million in donations in 2008 but handed out only £118,000 to good causes (1.2 per cent).
The figures published by the New York Post also show that £5.1million went towards paying salaries.
Queen tried to use state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace
The Queen asked ministers for a poverty handout to help heat her palaces but was rebuffed because they feared it would be a public relations disaster, documents disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act reveal.
Royal aides were told that the £60m worth of energy-saving grants were aimed at families on low incomes and if the money was given to Buckingham Palace instead of housing associations or hospitals it could lead to "adverse publicity" for the Queen and the Government.
Aides complained to ministers in 2004 that the Queen's gas and electricity bills, which had increased by 50 per cent that year, stood at more than £1m a year and had become "untenable".
Then stop heating the bloody place! I don't care what insane rituals you 'need to' perform in there, or where it is you keep the Aryan children like M McCann and Baby P (who could ignore the Masonic tile flooring in that picture, just letting us know are you?) so that you can drink their blood. You know, I had blonde hair as a kid, until I was five or six. Could have been me, you evil evil bastards. Or maybe that whole thing is just a story. A blood libel if you will. I don't know, and it's probably best that I don't know.
Still - time to abolish the monarchy, the Crown, and all their little poxy foundations funded ultimately from the central bank mafia that feeds off of real people (i.e. non gods) just so they can live like they do while surrounded, as ever, by emaciated corpses.
Remember feudalism. If those peasants were alive and well fed today, they would know what to do. Unfortunately we have been lullaby'd and think that we have benevolent rulers. I mean, at least their feudal lord ancestors were honest about being whip crackers.
Thursday, 23 September 2010
But, and it's not the first time btw, what is up with this?
"Pope's astronomer says he would baptise an alien if it asked him"
But nobody asked him. It's like, 'okay, you weren't even inquiring about that, it was completely off topic, but I'll just go ahead and tell you anyway'.
Why the alien, or raelien, PSYOP?
HG Wells started the PSYOP a century ago, and his story sent naive radio listeners running scared. Here. So you could say it fits in with the earthly NWO agenda, get the whole world united against an external common enemy, a kind of interplanetary Bin Laden.
Certainly some people believe this is possible.
Yet, that's kind of crap. A light show. No, that makes no sense at all, not without other elements to make it real, a real piece of mystery school terrorism. But still I put little faith in that idea, just makes no sense, (except of course to some Christian fundies whose #1 concern is that people might abandon Jesus for a dancing Bluebeam sky show).
Anyway, some people believe it's all about this:
[The strategy that Wernher Von Braun taught me was that first the Russians are going to be considered to be the enemy. In fact, in 1974, they were the enemy, the identified enemy. We were told that they had “killer satellites”. We were told that they were coming to get us and control us – that they were “Commies.”
Then terrorists would be identified, and that was soon to follow. We heard a lot about terrorism. Then we were going to identify third-world country “crazies.” We now call them Nations of Concern. But he said that would be the third enemy against whom we would build space-based weapons.
The next enemy was asteroids. Now, at this point he kind of chuckled the first time he said it. Asteroids- against asteroids we are going to build space-based weapons.
And the funniest one of all was what he called aliens, extraterrestrials. That would be the final scare. And over and over and over during the four years that I knew him and was giving speeches for him, he would bring up that last card. “And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie.”] (source)
They want nothing more than for you to worship them. I mean, they've got the Christians kneeling before the egotistical, murdering psychopath Jehovah, who frankly, well if that is really God then I'm an atheist, I'll put it that way. The atheists think they are free from the madness, but most of them worship government, and at risk of being cliche, their demogogy can be surely as much a religion as any other.
And then we have a third group emerging out of the Hegelian dialectic. Just as Communitarianism seems to be the synthesis of the right and left, so there is a kind of religious synthesis emerging from the clash of atheism and monotheism, order out of chaos. The new religion I suppose, new agey, alienish, and altogether toxic, in my opinion. Certainly in the way it is promoted. Something very cult like about the whole thing, you get that sense from many UFO sites too. If you need a laugh google Sherry Shriner, taking note that Shriner = Mason.
There, I've criticised just about everyone, atheists, monotheists, pantheists as I could loosely be called (with an emphasis on loosely), everyone. I think you've just got to go your own way and not let these possessed cocksuckers control you if you can help it.
Something as simple as Pascal's Wager holds billions of people in line. How sad is that. Even I wonder sometimes, do people really get burned forever for what is in essence the equivalent of picking the wrong box on Deal or No Deal? In a just universiality I doubt it.
...but what if I'm wrong?...
...damn you Pascal.
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
story via Vigilant Citizen
Lindsay Lohan's alter egos
Friend says multiple personalities may be agitating the actress, who at times goes by 'Diane' or 'Margot'
BY BILL ZWECKER Sun-Times Columnist
A longtime Lindsay Lohan associate says she thinks the actress may have multiple personality disorder -- perhaps one reason she continues to have trouble keeping her addictions in check.
''Some of us had wondered if Lindsay was bipolar, given her mood swings, but I'm thinking it's more than that,'' said the source, who claims LiLo has on occasion called herself ''Diane'' or ''Margot.''
According to the insider, Lohan has explained the odd behavior as her way of ''getting into and out of character'' as an actress -- ''pretending to be other people.''
Supposedly, friends have urged Lohan to seek professional counseling for this issue, but to no avail.
• In various statements and tweets over the weekend, Lohan herself said battling addiction is an ongoing process that can only be accomplished over a long period of time. After failing two drug tests last week -- including one for cocaine -- Lohan was seen attending at least two AA meetings over the weekend in Los Angeles.
• While sympathetic to her fight with the disease of addiction, several top Hollywood execs told me this weekend that Lohan's career is likely over -- at least for now. ''No one will insure her for a film,'' said a veteran studio honcho. ''It's a big shame, coming after that great bit she did on the VMA's with Chelsea Handler -- and the news she's landed that hosting gig on 'Saturday Night Live.' ... Those are opportunities for Lindsay to use comedy to be honest with what is a very serious problem.''
Prodigy says Jay Z sides with the 'evil Illuminati'
David Icke: Satanism/Bohemian Grove
You know, I said, today I would take a moment to not point the finger. Because there are three pointing back at you, as the saying goes. I merely advocate freedom and self determination for all people, and peaceful coexistence. But fate propelled me in this direction nonetheless.
Govern/mental = control/of the mind. See? 'Government' means 'mind control'.
Government provides us with many things we (apparently) could not do otherwise. But who would build roads? Who would arrest the criminals? Who would defend our country? Who would keep big business in check?
I don't know. There has not been a functioning human society without government since agrarian medieval Ireland.
However, for all those quick to denounce the idea that government is not necessary, it is important to remember that the state apparatus must surely cause as many or more problems than it solves.
The market incentivises production. Only government incentivises destruction. Without government there can be no large scale war, because no-one in their right mind would pay for it out of their own pocket...they need someone else, everyone else, to be forced to pay. Hence government.
Imagine you are in control of a nation's police force. Now you get, say, ten million pounds per year to fund your operations, taken by force from everyone else. Let's say you are a nice and principled person, and you set to work stamping out all the organised crime, the drug runners, the mobs, the thieving bastards. What happens now?
"Crime at all time lows."
"Public question need for large police force."
"Government calls for cut to police funding."
And now you're down to 5 million pounds. See, there's not much of an incentive to wipe out the criminals, is there? In fact there is a disincentive.
Now, let's supppose you took a more selfish approach. See, the people clearly will only be willing to pay through the nose for your 'services', if there is something they are afraid of, and thus need protection from. So, you allow some drug runners and mobs to operate, in return for a cut from them of course. And to thank them for their co-operation, you deploy the full weight of the Law against their competitors.
The public are aware and afraid of the crime, but you as police chief hold up your hands, say "we're doing all we can but we need more funding", and you can even point to the arrests of the opposing mobs as evidence you are serious about removing the problem. What happens then?
(During a drug raid, this kid needed a pee. He could have had cocaine in there or anything.)
"Police declares all out war on drug cartel"
"Public offer full support to police effort"
"Police demand funding for their operations"
"Government to push through police funding initiative"
And now you're sitting on 40 million pounds a year, with no shitting intention of doing anything about the problem, except a few token arrests.
Now you may say this is a conspiracy theory, yet nothing I have just described involves the need for conspiracy. Just people acting, in an unfree market, in their own self interest. If this is a conspiracy then so is every large and small business in existence.
I believe it is like this in any government agency, just the police/drug war example is the best and most blatant. The crime business and the police business have a mutual dependency on one another. Government disincentivises productive activity, and incentivises destruction of property, of life. Like the inverted pentagram symbolically does to the moral order, government inverts the natural economic order.
This realisation will free you from the mind control, ie the 'government'. I'm not saying anarchy is the way. Certainly not now, not when the West is being sunk into chaos, which is frankly what most people associate anarchy with, when truly there is a difference between no government/chaos and self government, which one day will be the norm if and when this species acheives a little sanity. Or, self control of the mind if you prefer.
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Russia today, tomorrow the world
The 11 September attacks in New York were an inside job; the South Korean warship torpedoed in March was not sunk by North Korea, but probably by Japan or the US; and the world is run by the secretive Bilderberg Group, who pursue a "New World Order". Not the lonely ravings of a conspiracy-minded blogger, but all opinions aired recently on a satellite channel beamed into millions of American homes.
With its slick graphics, smiling young news-anchors, and round-the-clock coverage, RT is like any other news channel. But there is one major difference, aside from the content: RT, which stands for Russia Today, is paid for by the Kremlin. The channel launched in 2005, broadcasting news mainly about Russia on various satellite packages around the world.
You might remember a provocative ad campaign across London last year, with posters showing pictures of Barack Obama and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and asking, "Who poses the bigger nuclear threat?"
In the US, ads were run on screens inside New York taxis, and the channel even broadcast live on big screens in Times Square. This year, RT went even further in its attempts to infiltrate the US, when a new arm of the channel, RT America, began broadcasting from Washington DC several hours a day, exclusively for a US audience...
The thing with RT is, they cover all the stuff that Western news really should, but doesn't. They give a voice to all the anti-NWO figures we know from cyberspace - Celente, Tarpley, Keiser, Madsen etc. Now RT are no angels and the Russian government are no saints, however they are not completely on board with the NWO agenda.
It must be horriffic for the mind controllers in London to see a news channel with the slogan "question more". Er, no, don't they understand how TV news is supposed to work? Question less, question less! "Accept what we tell you and shut up", should be the mantra of BBC/Sky/ITN. ITN just like the above newspaper have independent in their name, very misleading and possibly illegal, not as though that has ever concerned TPTB before of course; they make the law.
Anyone who is Russophobic on the grounds of Communism, I remind you that the Red Terror was a London operation against the Russian people (heck even Karl Marx himself spent some time in London), and that if you look at the early Soviet leaders/parliament members, broken down by ethnicity and crypto-ethnicity, very few were Russian. I dare you.
Monday, 20 September 2010
These boys are going to make fine police officers once they get home.
It's deliberate, due to the Darwinian way these hierachial structures operate.
They might as well get it over with and open parliament/congress with a ceremonial sacrifice.
Sunday, 19 September 2010
"BRING OUR TROOPS HOME bnp in glasgow being attacked"
Also note that the real, truly hateful people are the radicalised, brainwashed, Communist students. Retarded means hindered or held back. A fitting description of anyone who has been subjected to over a decade of (re-)edyucashun.
So who's really engaging in persecution, and anti-freedom, fascistic behaviour? Leaflet above shows Communists determined to harass anything vaguely pro-Western and anticommunist, wherever it may be.
It doesn't really matter what you think of the BNP. These demon kids are the real danger, and they absolutely will throw you in a camp if you are 'Nazi Scum', which means if you at all oppose Communism or the Green agenda. They can only repeat what the school system has filled their head with. They, simply, do not understand what is being done to them, and how they are far far more deadly than the imaginary Nazi Scum they think they are fighting.
Communists tearing down an anti-war protest banner just because it isn't a Communist anti-war protest banner. Get your head around that one.
Relevant news #1 - Britain goes Halal (in secret)
Relevant news #2 - Soldiers' memorial to be cut down
Now if that isn't symptomatic of a dying country I don't know what is.
Back when I was in 6F, the BNP came to town one day, and a lovely group called Hope Not Hate actually distributed leaflets to all in my 6F telling them to come and protest the BNP. Yeah, bring in people who know nothing except what the Communist dumbed down school system has taught them, they are the people we really need to listen to.
Hope. In a world where patriots are Nazi Scum, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength, just what is 'hope'? And what is 'hate'?
They just don't get it, but they will. Reality will mug them. Reality is a mean bitch like that. And once they do get it, all that misplaced anger will be redirected at their thought controllers.
Tricky thing, keeping the youth controlled. Can go horribly wrong, they'll go all Edelweiss on you if you force it too much.
I have to at this point mention Vigilant Citizen in a favourable manner; his site has reached one or two young people I know about who first viewed his site months ago due to the music related articles and have since, not necessarily WTFU'd, but are getting there. We need the youth to break their indoctrination, not to be future Commie/Green death squads as they are being trained for.
RT - The poor and impoverished turn to the forest
But there's nowhere to run to...nowhere to hide.
PS I knew Defiance was predictive programming when it came out, as well as being obvious post-Gaza Hollywood Hasbara propaganda. If you've seen that film, it's obviously aimed partly at those awakened. Run to the forest where we will hunt you down with thermal imaging, yeah that's a smart idea. Tech has moved on a little since the Nasty era.
Saturday, 18 September 2010
First of all, it should be noted (re 1:37) that there is no physical evidence to suggest any of the 19 alleged Saudi hijackers were behind 9/11, and there is no physical evidence linking Osama or Al-CIAda to 9/11.
Since Arabs are Semites, it is also anti-Semitic to believe that Arabs did 9/11, with no supporting evidence, as many people do.
Also (re 3:10) it is interesting to note that the only reason people believe an asinine theory about 19 hijackers and their indestructible passports, is because it has been 'told and re-told' over and over again, from day one, by the corporate controlled media, which as the makers of this report know fine well has a large Jewish contingent to it. Oh, can't say that can we? Sorry, it just slipped out.
It's just disgusting that people would believe such an anti-Semitic theory!
As Arabs doing 9/11.
"Jews" didn't do 9/11. Mossad-MI6-CIA operate as one. The Rothschild/City of London power axis. Doing God's work. Rebuilding the British Empire, er I mean "Rebuilding America's Defenses". Oh come on. Anyone with a Chosen attitude will Choose themselves to run the world, and that includes British Israel too.
"Is the 2009 H1N1 flu shot safe for pregnant women?
The seasonal flu shot has been given to millions of pregnant women over many years. Flu shots have not been shown to cause harm to pregnant women or their babies. The 2009 H1N1 flu vaccine is being made in the same way and at the same places where the seasonal flu vaccine is made." (source)
Pregnant women were specifically targeted by the h1n1 vaccine campaign. (image source)
Friday, 17 September 2010
No no no, you can't pay it off, that's the point; it was designed that way, because you are a debt slave and you owe everything you have to your corporate slave masters.
This is why debt free currency (as exemplified by these resourceful Argentinians) is needed to undermine the control the banking criminals have due to only their slave money system being 'legal tender' (in other words, government is acting as the legal enforcement arm of the banking conspiracy against the people).
The National Debt can never and will never be 'paid off', it is mathematically impossible. It can only be written off, or paid perpetually until all the real wealth of the nation is in the hands of the central bankers (which is what we are doing right now).
We don't owe a penny. At least not to the banks or the government. But that doesn't mean they won't behave as if we do.
"Repudiate this lie of a debt!"
Or, if you're a sucker... lol
Thursday, 16 September 2010
"Let's not forget that the bankers are the next-door neighbours of the politicians. Most people can see the picture: the bankers grease the politicians' palms, the politicians bail out the bankers with public funds, the bankers pay themselves fat bonuses and loan the money back to the public with interest. It's essentially a crime spree that benefits a social elite at the expense of many millions of victims."
Real IRA says it will target UK bankers
I would wish them good hunting, but this stinks of PSYOP any way you cut it. Still, the other financial criminals would be wise to follow the Goldman Gang's lead in arming themselves. I doubt our totalitarian gun laws would apply to Gods like them.
"The latest satellite data establishes that the North Atlantic Current (also called the North Atlantic Drift) no longer exists and along with it the Norway Current. These two warm water currents are actually part of the same system that has several names depending on where in the Atlantic Ocean it is. The entire system is a key part of the planet’s heat regulatory system; it is what keeps Ireland and the United Kingdom mostly ice free and the Scandinavia countries from being too cold; it is what keeps the entire world from another Ice Age. This Thermohaline Circulation System is now dead in places and dying in others."
A little reminder about our (Britain's) latitude: ~53 deg north
That is comparable to the Hudson Bay in Canada, for instance..in other words it is the ocean currents that cause our climate to behave as if we were ten or twenty degrees closer to the equator.
All I will say is, if he's right, you'll know in a couple of months. Brrrrr
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
Oppose Lucifer without supporting Jehovah
Expose the NWO without supporting the OWO
Oppose the OWO without supporting the NWO
Expose Feminism without supporting Misogyny
Oppose Misogyny without supporting Feminism
Expose Multiculturalism without provoking race hatred
Oppose race hatred without supporting Multiculturalism
Denounce Communism without supporting British Israel
Expose British Israel without supporting Communism
Heal the Earth without blaming the CO2
Cherish the CO2 but not the harming of the Earth
Still alive? Good. Wouldn't rather any other way.
No need to apologise for being on the mirror's edge.
Show us your walk.
And finally a little reminder. Oh no I didn't just suggest that...
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
Now it's not simply Scottish independence from London, they also would need to avoid the EU, which is of course run by the same people who run London and thus would benefit from a fake Scottish independence from the UK only for Scotland to be held under EU control instead.
Also, it's not as if it's a one way street in terms of resources. Scotland and northern England are heavily dependent on government schemes, which is a problem I believe will disappear pretty quickly should we or any place be capable of removing the banking oilgarchy from power. However until then, that is our vice.
I like Scotland and I may be part Scottish myself. My mother's side of my family is Celtic in appearance and I have some relatives who live in Scotland, but they moved up there, and so I don't know if they are Irish or Scottish originally (Co. Durham as many parts of England had a lot of Irish migration during the Crown genocide in Ireland; many DLI medals from the late 1800s were awarded to Irish born soldiers, for instance).
My father's side of my family is Anglo-Saxon as far as I can tell. They have that Anglo-Saxon eccentricity. Yes that includes my coal mining, WW2 fighting, Anglo-Saxon grandfather. ZGR wouldn't believe me. :)
Anyway, back on point, it's nationalism as I said that will overcome the international bankers' control system (in any country). Crude, yes; simplistic, maybe; but sometimes a blunt object is the only one that comes to hand, and that's just the way it is. Ultimately I support the somewhat idealistic but nonetheless excellent vision of secession.net, to secure true self determination.
I'm seeing a lot more flags flying locally in recent times, and not just because of the World Cup. Maybe I misread that sign when I thought it was just football oriented - maybe it's a good thing. The nation still sleeps but its subconscious is just starting to awaken. The people may appear 'fat and happy' (for now) but they are starving for real information.
Well, aren't you going to feed them? ;)
Hey this kid is a better actor than Osama. He should convert to Islam, would make future Muzzie bogeyman videos more convincing.
Seriously, poor brainwashed child. What a Marxist, subversive video. He's right about one thing though, he hasn't got much of a future unless these manipulations can be undone.
video via David Icke
What, no banks? No lending? No interest? HOW CAN THEY SURVIVE WITHOUT THOSE??!!!
Monday, 13 September 2010
by Peter Hitchens for the Daily Mail
Here comes the Pope, though he would have much more fun if he stayed in Rome for root canal dentistry.
His mysterious visit, to the country in Europe where he is most likely to be insulted, is the target of every liberal elitist in Britain.
A whole assembly of crackpot sexual revolutionaries and wild ultra-Leftists will be ranged against him.
Such people normally do not have much popular support. Against the previous Pope, their campaign would have been insignificant squeaking, barely heard above
But thanks to the abuse of children by some priests, and the Roman Church’s
feeble efforts to punish them, all that has changed. It is now respectable again to be anti-Catholic.
Well, that’s reasonable. Paedophilia is disgusting, and particularly so among men supposedly dedicated to goodness.
But the Vatican doesn’t actually tell its priests to abuse children. The vast majority of them do not so do. And it has tried to stamp out the problem and to offer genuine apologies to the victims.
I (as a non-Roman Catholic) have examined some of the main charges levelled against Benedict XVI by his attackers, and found that several of them are simply untrue, whereas others have been crudely distorted.
I have also examined the record of one of the main critics of the Papal visit. This is Peter Tatchell, prominent in the ‘Protest the Pope’ campaign.
I admire Mr Tatchell’s physical and moral courage, notably when he was badly beaten by Robert Mugabe’s bodyguards for attempting a citizen’s arrest of that monster. The effects of that beating still trouble him.
But this does not cancel out what I believe is the hypocrisy of his attempt – and that of the Left in general – to wage war on the Pope by employing the charge of condoning or failing to act against paedophilia (it is No 5 in the charge-sheet set out by ‘Protest the Pope’).
For on June 26, 1997, Mr Tatchell wrote a startling letter to the Guardian newspaper.
In it, he defended an academic book about ‘Boy-Love’ against what he saw as calls for it to be censored. When I contacted him on Friday, he emphasised that he is ‘against sex between adults and children’ and that his main purpose in writing the letter had been to defend free speech.
He told me: ‘I was opposing calls for censorship generated by this book. I was not in any way condoning paedophilia.’
Personally, I think he went a bit further than that. He wrote that the book’s arguments were not shocking, but ‘courageous’.
He said the book documented ‘examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal’.
He gave an example of a New Guinea tribe where ‘all young boys have sex with older warriors as part of their initiation into manhood’ and allegedly grow up to be ‘happy, well-adjusted husbands and fathers’.
And he concluded: ‘The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy.
‘While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.’
Well, it’s a free country. And I’m rather grateful that Mr Tatchell, unlike most of his allies, is honest enough to discuss openly where the sexual revolution may really be headed.
What he said in 1997 remains deeply shocking to almost all of us. But shock fades into numb acceptance, as it has over and over again. Much of what is normal now would have been deeply shocking to British people 50 years ago. We got used to it. How will we know where to stop? Or will we just carry on for ever?
As the condom-wavers and value-free sex-educators advance into our primary schools, and the pornography seeps like slurry from millions of teenage bedroom computers, it seems clear to me that shock, by itself, is no defence against this endless, sordid dismantling of moral barriers till there is nothing left at all.
Yet when one of the few men on the planet who argues, with force, consistency and reason, for an absolute standard of goodness comes to this country, he is reviled by fashionable opinion.
(Two sides of the same coin, is all I can say.)
Last year the Sunday Times spoke to one dealer who said members of the military were the second largest buyers of heroin after foreign drug lords. The newspaper was told: "The soldiers whose term of duty is about to finish, they give an order to our boss." A team of detectives from the Ministry of Defence's special investigations branch is believed to be heading the investigation into the claims."
- Troops heroin trafficking claim investigated by MoD
Opium output in Afghanistan. Western forces invaded in late 2001, on the basis that the Saudi hijackers on 9/11, many of whom had survived flying a passenger jet into a skyscraper, may be hiding in Afghanistan. Or that CIA agent, I mean radical Saudi Islamist Osama bin Laden was hiding there, perhaps with his family who are best friends with George... oh wait. Never mind, now it's about fighting for, er, womens' rights. Yeah, that one. That's why the drones are there, they take out those damn wife beaters. Die patriarchs! Afghanistan is liquidat- er, liberated.
Anyone who thinks this is just some rogue group of soldiers is missing the point about the drug trade, the drug war, why certain drugs are illegal and who benefits from that. C'mon now, put it all together...
'War On Drugs' In Afghanistan?
Sunday, 12 September 2010
Prince of Wales spreads eco-loon gospel on his amazing, biofuel-powered crazy train
India: land ownership is everything
Just remember, sustainable = without you.
May we live long, and they can die out.
Westboro Baptist Church Burns The Koran (NSFW to say the least)
See, they are alright. The rest of you who chickened out are 'dhimmis'. :D
If you're interested and have the time (6x50mins) the series can be viewed here: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Rated R for Rothschild. ;)
Sort of halfway between the crap version of history most people think they know, and the truth. Although it's still heaving with propaganda I actually owe a little to that series. There are several points where Ferguson shows us London et al intervening in things that have nothing to do with them, but of course he very quickly passes over these moments. The discerning viewer however can fill in the blanks and see the hidden hands.
It had never occurred to me that the Communists, for instance, were just as bad as Nasty Germany, who killed for no reason other than to maintain Aryan Supremacy. I mean, yeah, a lot of people died in Commie Russia, younger AdamS reasoned, but it was because they were trying to implement a new ideal that would bring about equality and end anti-Semitism. Sadly it went badly wrong because Communist ideals were so pure that imperfect fallen humans are simply not ready for them, and we'd better settle for moderate redistributive democracy instead.
Ohhhhhh you better believe that was me.
I wonder how many of today's lefties think like that.
I wonder how many would admit to thinking like that.
Muslims Burn US Flag at London Embassy
If only the world were that simple, eh?
1. The Muslims would not be here if not for government open border and welfare policies that finance the mass immigration.
2. Government policies are the result of think tanks, political correctness and the whole Commie apparatus from Common Purpose right the way up to the central bank and the Crown.
Now if the EDL ever figure this out (wishful thinking I guess?) then, well, they will probably disappear, since they are only allowed to exist as long as they serve Israel and British Israel.
One thing I will say for them is they supposedly had a poor turnout for their particularly Zionist Al Quds day protest. I want to believe that is because some of their members aren't totally on board with the NWO/Zionist/Warforthecrown aspects of their organisation, however there is another reason; the football season has begun again (sigh).
Friday, 10 September 2010
As long as you remember, Muslims did 9/11. Never forget that. That way the Act can keep going. And after all maybe we like the Act. Maybe we "like to watch the plane coming in".
If you've been keeping up with Aloysius' writings on Makow's site you'll know the satanists do seem to believe they're giving us what we want.
Maybe some Muslims think they had done 9/11, but it's just 'wishful' thinking. Come back when you can fly Cessnas you imposteur saboteurs.
Justice or justus.
Over to you.
Thursday, 9 September 2010
This poster is racist, I'm complaining to the...er...the...?
Many people do hate, including in the political arena. Although a lot of hatred stems from personal issues, for example someone might hate the Brits if their family has suffered at the hands of the Crown, or one may hate Americans because the CIA has meddled in their country, or one may hate cats because they have just never got along with cats, hatred can also be much more subtle and be brought about by, essentially, brainwashing. Or to use a more polite term, propaganda.
In general hatred is not psychologically beneficial to an individual. It is certainly not helpful to the hated. So in general hatred makes losers all round, although I would certainly not criticise anyone who has justified hatred or anger over a wrong.
But what constitutes hatred? How does society, that is, the majority of society who are to a large extent under the spell of TPTB, define hatred? And most importantly, is this definition consistent?
Hatred is often simply something the Communist doesn't want to hear.
And by using the term 'Communist', I am referring to all those who deceptively call themselves 'progressives', 'global thinkers', and so on, which constitutes the left wing of the establishment - the right wing being the joint (Christian) Zionist and AngloMasonicBritishIsrael war/drug/terror groups. Really they're all stinking Commies whether they even know what they're serving or not. Well really I don't know what they're serving either, but, another story for another day eh...
So the popular (Communist) conception of what hatred is goes something like this. Racists first, then sexists, then homophobes, then xenophobes and nationalists, then if you're a real hardcore Commie, spieciesists.
It's hateful, for instance, to burn a Quran. But, and I'm not a Christian btw (that would be 'hateful', lol), it's OK for that Yiddish American guy to piss on Jesus for his TV show, that is freedom of speech.
It's hateful to ban a burkha but it's OK to ban employees from wearing cross necklaces.
It's hateful (and sexist!) to say that abortion is wrong but it's OK for pro abortion types to tell young girls, hey, if you get pregnant, don't tell your parents, come and see us, we'll get rid of it for you quietly and the government will pay. Yes that is a paraphrase of something the 'health visitor' who taught us PSE basically told to the girls in my class, who were like 14 at the time. Always remembered that because even back then as an unwilling unwitting participant in John Dewey's Commie Circus it seemed very wrong.
It's hateful to say that women are better homemakers, but it's OK for feminists (can't remember which one) to compare women who choose to be housewives with concentration camp inmates. Y'know, the kind of mindset described here.
Here's one that will really get to some people. It's hateful to say that homosexuality is wrong but it's OK for the media to encourage homosexuality at every turn. Well they do, don't they? And they also attack the herterosexual nuclear family at every turn, do they not? Is that hateful? No, it's 'progressive' of course. Silly me.
Okay then. Let's shift directions a little. It's OK for the crazy Muslims to promote Sharia for the UK etc, or it's OK for the crazy Communist La Raza to declare huge swathes of the US to belong to the Mestizo people exclusively, but it's tough to even argue against illegal immigration without having to open every sentence with "I'm not racist but...", because having a view that stands in the way of Communism is 'hateful'.
It's OK to call the BBC "hideously white" (an asinine charge, I hope that doesn't include BBC's Asian only radio network?), but, at risk of sounding cliche, one can imagine how society would react if the situation was inversed, if someone called their Asian network "hideously brown" for instance.
However, who really hates? I don't.
Who is carrying out this agenda of destroying the West from all angles?
While I am hardly a Christian myself - who takes every opportunity to mock and deride Christianity and spit on Christians?
Who has encouraged, nay paid millions of foreigners to come to Western lands, encouraged them to abuse their hosts at every turn, then told the few natives who dare have a problem with this to shut up and stop being so racist and hateful?
Who has made every attempt to undermine the backbone of a healthy society, the family and related values?
Who promotes Malthusian ideology that humans are a pox on the Earth and need to be reduced or completely wiped out?
Who has distorted the definition of 'hate' to make it seem like they are not the hateful ones, and everyone else is?
Who is making trouble where there need not be any?
Who are the Commies?
Alas, the quran burning has been cancelled. Score one for political correctness. Reminder to all, the battlefield is between your ears these days, full scale military planning goes into making damn sure you think the way GOV wants you to. And not deviating at all from the self destructive course they have set you on.
Muslims are a mild threat compared to what's coming next post.
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
One is the movement of self sufficiency and independence. Of "getting off the grid" and "food security", "anti-corporatism" and "low impact living". A big threat to the centralised, interdependent control grid.
The other is of course the CO2penhagen Commies, or Watermelons if you prefer.
So has the latter sabotaged the former?
I almost feel like the Carbon Commies backed down a little too easily after Copenhagen/Climategate. This Lord Monckton shows up, oh I don't doubt his sincerity but remember all the world's a stage, and within literally a few months, the whole game has changed and the CO2phobes are running away with their tales between their legs and wads of cash stuffed inside their Fair Trade sandals.
That's not like the usually audacious NWO to run like that. Now the old media is having to admit, well, we were shitting you all this time about boiling oceans, drowning polar bears et al. Not so blatantly but you get what I'm saying, they're backing off.
Is/was the green movement becoming a threat?
That's the beauty of these movements. Like the Tea Party. You try and control them, place your people at the helm, weed out the "extremist lunatic conspiracy theorists" (ie real deal anti NWO people), but they defragment and reform somewhere else; it must be like playing occultist whac-a-mole.
The genuine environmental movement should be, and frankly for the most part among ordinary people is, pro independence and self sovereignty, and utterly non Commie. Maybe, just maybe, they have been Tango'd.
And it takes two to tango.
"For me, the essential question has become: how well will we preserve the critical capacities of the present expert reading brain as we move to the digital reading brain of the next generation? Will the youngest members of our species develop their capacities for the deepest forms of thought while reading or will they become a culture of very different readers – with some children so inured to a surfeit of information that they have neither the time nor the motivation to go beyond superficial decoding? In our rapid transition into a digital culture, we need to figure out how to provide a full repertoire of cognitive skills that can be used across every medium by our children and, indeed, by ourselves." - Maryanne Wolf
We must remember that the internet, while a great blessing in terms of undermining the monolithic corporate control of information, is, like all technology, a double edged sword. And when I say 'we', I mean me, mostly. Myself, I used to find reading well into "tl;dr" territory not a problem at all, whereas now I kind of have to force the issue.
Sky News, bringing you the same repeating headlies every 15 minutes, because you're too dumbed down to appreciate in depth critical reporting and Rupert Murdoch knows it.
Actually I only bring that up because I recently saw a little of Russia Today, which is available for free in Britain, and which is far more sophisticated and intelligent than what passes for 'news' on BBC or Sky. British readers should compare this for themselves if they haven't already. Obviously they have their own agenda in defending the local tyrant (as opposed to the global tyrants) Putin and such, but since he doesn't seem to be on board with the Anglo-American establishment NWO agenda, there is a lot of room for 'real news' about the West that would never be shown in any of our news media. And that's before you get to Max Keiser and the whole gang of anti-NWO figures on their programming.
Funny word that, programming. What we call that which comes from a TV. Rather fitting. I don't really like the TV even when I agree with what's on it (which is rare). Just my opinion; some people say you should watch it just to see the subliminals and the propaganda everywhere, but I usually end up arguing with it, lol. Especially the fictional 'entertainment' which is always heaving with blatant propaganda. I just knew when they actually featured a Christian character in Coronation St, they had to torpedo it somehow - and lo and behold she became a lesbian within a few months. So predictable...are you sure that there is no Communist propaganda in your beloved 'entertainment'? Hell I even got my mother to notice that last one and believe me she does not want to see any of this stuff.
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
"How Winston Churchill saved this nation from the brink of extinction"
Get some real Churchill history here.
We run this place, and we provide you with all manner of false heroes and idols, do you not see? You will believe anything if you want to badly enough.
It delights us more than anything else to see you idolising one of our creations, the greater the deception involved in this act the better.
Monday, 6 September 2010
Alan Hart is a longtime crusader against Zionism, at least you would think, but if you dig a little you see that he has that Venus Project type Marxist mindset and thus, even if he is very sincere in his motives, is ultimately (imo) doing as much for the NWO as against it. He even quotes that nice chap Dewey.
According to Andrew Gavin Marshall, at Global Research, 5 September 2010, (The “Arc of Crisis”):
When Jimmy Carter became President, his government decided to support the Ayatollahs in Iran.
In 1978, Zbigniew Brzezinski referred to "an arc of crisis" and according to Time magazine, in January 1979, the "center of gravity of this arc is Iran, the world's fourth largest oil producer."
According to Peter Dale Scott, in The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America, "There was this idea that the Islamic forces could be used against the Soviet Union."
Sunday, 5 September 2010
Bloody facebook generation. And I'm allowed to say that, I'm part of it...lol. The generation I mean, not facebook; why would I want to be part of that MILINT data mine.
I mean, if they really gave a crap about your wellbeing, they would tell you about all the carcinogens you are exposed to from air, food, water, on and on. They would tell you about the dangers of refined sugar, at least. Or they would be nice enough to remove the Bisphenol A from food containers before it "saps and impurifies our precious bodily fluids".
No, they couldn't give a shit if you are vertical or horizontal at sixty, fifty, forty. On the contrary, they have endeavoured to ensure your untimely demise.
So why the fascist pogrom against smokers? Perhaps tar filled lungs aren't worth much when little piggy gets to market.
Why the war on salt? I don't know. I'd say distraction.
Why turn the whole nation into a giant Fat Camp? My best guess is that chubby hearts don't fetch much of a price.
And why prod people to eat more of this stuff? Unless your 5 a day makes you a better end product.
That's about the only way I can make sense out of this paradox. We are after all on a farm.
So, are you familiar with organ harvesting?
Wednesday, 1 September 2010
Tired of killing Arabs are we? Rather kill a few Persians instead, huh?
He cries in pain as he strikes you. Oh it's so hard for him, he's really sorry. Now drop the white phos on those sand niggers.
It has been quite a 'journey' watching his transformation from humble CP type actor to arch satanist over the last fifteen years. Indeed, he looks more and more like a daemon every day, don't you think? Maybe it's all those Mayan rituals, I don't know. Just like QE2, the evil eyes...aaaaahhhhhh...
Just think how Call Me Dave will end up if it all kicks off with him 'in charge'. Or rather, don't.
- The War on Drugs is a joke!
- September 11th...1941
- Gloating Articles Like These
- Iran Backs Down To Big Banks, Prevents WW3
- Ahmadinejad and 9/11 Again
- Is it impossible to pay off the National Debt?
- 250,000 Racist Children!
- About Ahmadinejad's 9/11 Comments...
- Frank Dikotter and Alex Jones discuss Mao Worship
- Bono and the Lizard Queen - Poverty Pimps
- What is it with the Vatican and Aliens?
- Linsey Lohan has Multiple Personalities...MK Victim?
- What's It Like To Wear A Burka?
- The State Paradox
- "The Independent" throws mud at Russia Today
- Not So Occult Anymore Are You?
- Retarded Communist Students vs BNP in Glasgow
- Poor Run To The Hills
- CNN's Crazy "Jews Did 9/11" Report
- CDC Covers Up Over 1500 Miscarriages From H1N1 Vac...
- Don't Say Dyke
- How Money Is Created By Banks
- Real IRA Says It Will Target Banksters
- Has The North Atlantic Current Stopped Due To Gulf...
- Walk The Tightrope
- Famine Watch: Russia Food Price Controls
- I Support Scottish Independence
- Greenpeace Communist Propaganda
- Bartering in Argentina
- The Pope's Biggest British Critic is Paedophile Sy...
- Well Why Do You Think We're In Afghanistan?
- Agenda 21 Dots
- Somebody Did Burn The Koran...
- I Thought I Recognised Rothschild's Historian
- EDL and Muslim protests in London 9/11 2010
- 9 Years Into The Act
- The Communists' Shifting Definition of 'Hate'
- Scootle on the Quran Burning/Flag Burning on 9/11
- Two Green Movements
- The internet: is it changing the way we think?
- Nice One, David Dees
- Winston Churchill a "gloriously flawed hero"?
- BBC Correspondent Says Mossad Did 9/11
- The USA's Support For The Ayatollahs
- My RFID Bracelet Is Like Soooooo Cooool...
- The Public Health Paradox
- Demonic Tony Blair Unrepentant, Pushes Iran War
- ▼ Sep 2010 (47)
- ► 2009 (555)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)