Euro Elections: Reaction ("I hate the EU" Edition)

Click here for European Election Results


British National Party Leader Elected To Europe

I will not defend the BNP for a moment. But this isn't what I'm writing about.

BNP leader Nick Griffin is now an MEP (Member of Euro Parliament). So what? I don't really care, since I do not recognise the EU as a legitimate authority over our once independent nation, but the BBC very much does.

I watched live as Griffin was announced as a representative (1 of 8 I think) for North-West England. Not a huge event, but the point is I was struck by the reaction from some of our friendly television pundits. One fat old woman remarked that we should be ashamed that we had elected a fascist to represent us.

Um...what about the fascists in the big corporate parties? Economic fascism at least. Government commanding and controlling (without owning) private for-profit companies is perhaps the worst economic system, worse than socialism even. It's why people in Britain hate so-called 'privatisation' of public services (economic fascism) and like nationalisation, when of course capitalisation (if that's a word) would get government out of the process altogether and would be the best soultion.

The be-atch then went on to compare 'gay bashers' and 'gypsy haters' with 'climate change deniers'. Nope, we're not ignorant, us 'deniers' of climate change, it *is* the sun as the evidence shows, and you are leading us into slavery with the pretence of saving the environment. Hypocritic Malthusian elitist scum.

This is also a time to consider how the label 'far right' is used. It doesn't just include fascists and racists, it also applies to people who are 'Euro-sceptic'. In other words, people who don't want to be the property of the Bilderberg Group, are extremists. Just another day in the alternate reality of the MSM. What's this, oh it's my brain! It's so clean, looks as if it's been WASHED!

The BNP are not anywhere close to being the biggest threat to our freedom in Britain today. That honour falls to the Bank of England/International Bank of Settlements first, with the EU and UN a close second. A few fools who love Labour and think the BNP are the greatest danger that ever existed, won't change that fact.

If only the anti-BNP crowd learnt of the truth about our monetary system, then they could spend their efforts campaigning for something worthwhile.

The Conservatives will not 'save us'

No, they won't. David Cameron, almost surefire to be PM after the next general election, has already gone back on earlier talk of a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. He has helped the Euro elite stab us in the front with their complete takeover of this nation in the name of international 'co-operation'.

The Conservatives are not going to address the real issues. They back the same socialist/fascist agenda with environmental and welfare overlayers. They will not end our wars, will not deal with the hundreds of QUANGOs funded by taxpayer money that are leeching off our system, will not support sound currency, will not support freedom. That is the be-all and end-all.

The EU is Illegitimate

You heard me, don't be ashamed to say it, this globalist authority is not your master unless you let it be. They write the vast majority of our laws, and our parliament has to pass them. They control our government, which makes our government equally illegitimate.

Voter turnout at this election was little more than two-fifths (43% is the figure given). Nobody gives a damn about the EU, except for on one hand, people who are opposed strongly to it, and on the other, yuppies who believe in the left-right false reality, and love the EU and everything about their own slavery. Most people obviously don't want anything to do with the EU.

By the way, it really annoys me when people say that those who don't vote are ignorant or lazy. That clearly will be true for some people, but I would argue as many or more people who are ignorant and lazy vote for a mainstream corporate party that promises them lots of free stuff in exchange for liberty. Many people who don't vote are having their own protest against the perceived legitimacy of the government, that's all. If no-one is on the ballot paper who I can at least partially agree with, I won't vote, rather than be a slave and choose a 'lesser of two evils'.

Pan-Europeanising party politics by stealth

It's noteworthy that the EU parliament is made up of only a few parties, for example the 'centre-right' European Peoples' Party. This is a party made up of many parties from individual member nations, for example the EPP includes British Conservatives, as well as mainstream right wing parties from France, Germany, Poland etc etc. The same goes for the EU Socialists, EU Greens, and so on.

Why does this matter? Because it's another piece of incrementalism. When we vote for individual parties in our respective nations, we are in fact voting for pan-EU coalitions who are represented as one bloc in the EU parliament. I'm sure many people who voted this time (myself included) were not aware of this fact. The EU are slimy crooks, aren't they?

Who Should We Vote For...If Anyone?

The litmus test for any political party or candidate is in my opinion Sound Money. Will they touch the real issue? Few in Britain will - it's why I don't regard Daniel Hannan, for example, as a complete solution to our governmental problems today. (But his speeches that made it to YouTube were of course good fun)

Do you want to talk about how the Bank of England issues worthless currency backed, in essence, by delusion and by the next generation? Do you want to talk about alternative currency solutions? Oh, that's too much for you? No votey then.

I voted for the UK Independence Party in these EU elections, since I back their EU policy (to get out now!!!). But I probably wouldn't support them to run this country, as they are a bit socialist and 'big government'. But that's fine, since you won't find many voters or parties here that don't support, for example, the NHS.

Basically, consider the Libertarians ;)
I'm not aware of any bigger parties that want to consider monetary reform. Or for that matter gun rights (save for the BNP of course).

And a final thought

We are well on the way to global government. At least the resistance is spreading, though perhaps too late to prevent a powerful federalised EU. We already there, save for an army: we have European taxes via govt contributions (£40 Million per day for the UK taxpayer!), common monetary systems (for most EU nations), open borders, a single passport, etc.

At least we can take heart from the large vote for anti-EU parties from all over Europe, especially right here. I still believe this New World Order can be prevented even without violent revolution. Since we don't have the luxury of citizen firepower like the Americans do, that won't be how to effect change in European states anyway. We must stop the propaganda and the apathy, especially among those who enforce for our corrupt masters; then change (not the fake change of Barack Obama or David Cameron) will come.

Federal Reserve stuff

End The Fed! :)


Fiat Empire: Why the Federal Reserve Violates the US Constitution


End the Fed protest, with Alex Jones on the bullhorn


Wayne Paul (brother to Ron Paul) on the Federal Reserve (from The Obama Deception)

WHO backs anti-diarrhoea Vaccine

“Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool" - from the Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) paper Rebuilding America's Defenses.


Well, we don't appear to be at that stage quite yet, but one thing that is happening is we are being hit with more vaccines than ever before. While the elites want virtually everyone to die (save for themselves of course), they also seem to be tremendously racist, and harbour the most hatred for non-whites. And more hatred means more vaccines with more stuff in 'em.

In the West, the most they can get away with is mercury/thimerosal, among other things. While horiffic, and often lethal or permanently damaging, it isn't live AIDS, is it? Africa gets the worst vaccines by far, so bad that even in these empoverished regions word has got around enough that in many areas, people refuse to get shot up at all. But when that happens, it's a tragedy, because the foolish locals believe in voodoo things like vaccines harming people. If only they were better educated, then they would learn to take their shot...

BBC - WHO backs anti-diarrhoea vaccine

The World Health Organization says a vaccine which can prevent a diarrhoea and vomiting virus should be given to all children as a routine vaccination.

Rotavirus causes more than 500,000 diarrhoeal deaths and two million hospitalisations a year among children. Over 85% of deaths occur in developing countries in Africa and Asia. International experts welcomed the WHO's recommendations, based on new research, but UK scientists have said the vaccine is too costly.

'Milestone'

The WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) made its recommendations after new data from clinical trials.

The clinical trial, which involved a range or organisations including the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations (GAVI) and drug company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), which makes the vaccine plus researchers in South Africa and Malawi, found that rotavirus vaccine significantly reduced severe diarrhoea episodes.

The WHO's Dr Thomas Cherian, said: "This is a tremendous milestone in ensuring that vaccines against the most common cause of lethal diarrhoea reach the children who need them most."

Isn't it nice that the globalists want to save the poor children? It just makes me feel all warm and autistic inside. But in the Third World, it's less autism and more, you know, stone dead.

Would you sell gold for cash NOW?!?

With gold prices close to $1000 an ounce, and forecasted by some to double as the economy gets worse, it seems the 'got gold get cash' people are back on my TV set telling me to sell my unwanted gold to them. Okay, so generally this is in the form of jewellery rather than proper gold coins etc, but still, only the zombies would believe cash has real value and gold does not.


I don't know what is more stupid at this time; selling gold, or buying into paper assets. So let's do both just to make sure...

Maybe I'm being a little harsh. Many people will be paying bills with the paper they get for their gold. But I suspect many just see the wad of paper cash and believe it's worth as much as the gold; well, it's their loss, I guess.

Baby girl forcibly Vaccinated, now Autistic

Sickening. First of all, the parents have one child that develops autism after getting shot up, then when they have a second baby they don't want to vaccinate her, but doctors (surname Mengele perhaps?) take the baby and shoot her up anyway. And guess what, she gets autism and nearly dies.



If you want more info about vaccines, I have written and linked to some good information before. Just keyword 'vaccine' into the search box. ^

What are we doing to our children?

I don't want to add anything to this, it's obvious. Read it, get mad, not too mad though, don't throw your computer out the window. It's not worth it. :)


Daily Mail Article

Little Brother is watching you: Children of ten are taught how to spot a terrorist in police DVD

Hundreds of children as young as ten are being urged to spot potential terrorists and shop them to police.

Up to 2,000 are to attend a safety event where a film will tell pupils that extremist views can develop at school.

But critics condemned the initiative as a nightmare extension of the Big Brother state. Concerns were also raised that children could become subject to police monitoring if their fellow pupils misinterpreted innocent remarks or play.

The Lancashire Police film is being shown in Blackburn as part of its long-running Streetwise event which includes demonstrations on fire safety, water hazards and first aid. A spokesman said the reference to terrorism could encompass any extremist, including animal rights activists, and not just Islamist fundamentalism.

He said: ‘It’s something we need to be aware of across the country. We’re not trying to scare anybody, we’re just raising awareness.’

But Estella Schmid, a founder of the Campaign against Criminalising Communities, warned: ‘This is a nightmare scenario. This risks criminalising children and is showing the expansion of the state into the most private areas.’

Israeli Settlers, History Written by the NWO Victors

You see, it's OK, even good, when Israeli 'settlers' (Newspeak for invaders) build on West Bank territory that *ought* to be sovereign territory of a nation called Palestine (yes such a nation does still exist).

But when these 'settlers' are removed, even on a very small scale as a PR excercise, it's just horiffic and we should condemn those who would be so nasty to the lovely Israeli 'settlers'.



(Images: Above, 1948 Palestine land ownership divided between Arabs (green) and Jews (red). Who has the majority in every region? Below, a letter from Einstein talking about Palestine.)

As the BBC story linked to above says:

"Israeli police have destroyed the small illegal settler outpost camp of Maoz Ester in the occupied West Bank. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law and widely considered a barrier to peace. But the outpost of seven huts, east of Ramallah, was among dozens of sites also illegal under Israeli law, built without government authorisation."

Widely considered a barrier to peace!? Invading another country and pitching tent on their land, then claiming you have the right to that land and anyone who doesn't say so is a Jew hater? Um...no. You are not God-Men. I do not acknowledge your right to "exist", as you so often say, if you mean to exist as a nation on stolen ground; uttering 'never again', while causing that 'again' of which you speak, to become a reality.

Media language confuses Mideast coverage

(Image: One of several maps of Israel drawn without any recognition of the Palestinians' 'right to exist'. Israel's expansionism and accusations of racism towards others, while they go out and get their 'Lebensraum' in a once sovereign state, is a great hypocrisy.)

That said, do I think the state of Israel should never have been created? Well, as I have said before, I understand given the circumstances of the early 20th Century world that 'the Jews' may wish to have their own state. But let's be realistic here, Palestine was never 'a land without a people', was it? It kind of had, you know, a native population, the majority of which were Arabs. And you came in and took over, didn't you?

It's funny, it reminds me of how American settlers behaved with the Native Americans hundreds of years ago. That was a tragedy and the end result was a slow and bloody genocide, much as we have seen in the last fifty years in Palestine. And don't bring me the same old recycled lines about terrorists and Israel's right to defend itself. For starters, you'd have to explain how Israel created Hamas then used it as justification for their operations 'abroad' in Gaza, a region of sovereign Palestine.

Israel's right to exist means its right to exist anywhere, anytime, all it has to do is point on a map and say 'this is Israel'. Possibly this could extend as far as Saudi Arabia, parts of Egypt and Iraq, etc. as these maps suggest. When Napoleon did it, he was wrong. When Hitler did it, he was wrong. When Israel does it, guess what, they are wrong too.

Israel's right to defend itself means its right to wage siege warfare on the world's largest concentration camp, Gaza, attacking sources of food, cutting off water, dehumanising humans, and not expect any retaliation. None whatsoever. Oh, you fired a rocket? You terrorist! (Even as Sderot was built on a former Palestinian settlement, the residents of which were evicted before the site was bulldozed and Sderot built in its place. Not justifying the rockets, just providing context.) Now you fired ten rockets, we get to drop a thousand bombs including white phosphorous. After all, we just defend ourselves!

But no media will report on any time in the last sixty years when Native Israelis (as they might be known if history treats them better than modernity has) were evicted by force. Nope, it didn't happen. No Israeli expansionism ever happened, they're just taking what's theirs. Like I'm taking back my wallet. It just *looks* like it's in your pocket...

It's funny when pro-Israel people remind us of the 'religion of peace' and the many atrocities committed in the name of Islam, then go ahead and butcher more people, because religious history says this they (Jews) have been promised this land! 'Religions of peace', more like.

What are moral and realistic solutions?

The consumer has helped by cutting off funds to Israel, by not buying anything with '729' at the start of the barcode. (Boycott Israeli Goods) I don't think I buy anything Israeli anyway, but there's a long list of companies that are complicit in trading goods from the Occupied Territories, who it would be best to avoid. Unfortunately, American elected representatives aren't so ethical, and like to send lots of money to Israel. A third of ALL their foreign aid, in fact.

Unfortunately, let's be realistic here, Palestine is confined to history. Anything else is nostalgia and pure hope. I think the best solution is to accept the inevitable and get the Arabs who don't want to live under Israeli rule, to go to Jordan. It's not ideal, far from it. But I'm being pragmatic here. I don't want a modern era repeat of Wounded Knee.

Apart from that, it would be nice to see international pressure on an expansionist Israel; however, with "Zion" being the pet project of the good old House of Rothschild and the other banking elites around the world, it's unlikely to ever materialise due to the scale of influence held by these money powers.

I guarantee this: the moral ideal of the two-state solution isn't going to happen. Not that it would be fair or right, but moving the Arabs who want to govern themselves as an ethnic majority (rather than be a minority in Israel) away, into Jordan or wherever else, might be a better solution. If there had been an opportunity to evacuate the Natives at Wounded Knee to somewhere safer, you would have taken it, right?

European Elections May 2009

I'd rather these elections didn't happen. Not because I am against choosing leaders, or because I don't want to vote, but because I would rather we had nothing to do with the European structure of government. We must get out of the EU before it gulps down the remainder of our sovereignty and finishes it off with a side of biometricised cashless society. (Does that mean depopulation is for dessert? hehe)

(Image: American, but applies to any 'democracy' today. The false choice between two or more parties with the same long-term agenda has proved a great success for the establishment.)

So, with that in mind, I voted for the UK Independence Party. Secession, baby. I don't agree with them on everything, and they don't touch the real problem of central banks, but then who does, save for the Libertarians.

UKIP in my mind were the best ones running. Not that I would vote for the 'lesser of two evils' (that's how left-right enslavement works!), but I don't see them as an evil. Meh.

Do I think we will see some great change in Brussels as a result? That would be like a wife expecting her abusive husband to change *this* time. Like Neville Chamberlain hoping that Hitler was satisfied with his borders *this* time. I considered not voting. But, I guess, voting for anyone who'll work to remove the system's control from the inside is better than nothing. Again, nobody can change the system, we can only reduce its influence on us all, or better still, leave it completely.

As for "If you don't vote, don't complain":
Sometimes not voting is the highest form of complaint at the system. I would rather not vote than support any of the corporate slavery parties the TV tells me I am permitted to like.

Following on from what I wrote recently about democracy; when democracy is in distress, you can be sure liberty has already bled out a long time ago.

Edible Vaccines and Flying Syringes

Ready for forced mass medication by Big Brother?


What follows is a steal from Infowars

Edible Vaccines and Flying Syringes

Daniel Taylor
Old-thinker News
June 1, 2009

When genetically modified foods were first introduced, the biotech industry hailed tomatoes that were frost resistant and round-up ready crops. Now, there is a further development in biotech that has received little attention in the mainstream media. Serious environmental and health concerns still surround GM food safety, but new technologies are being developed to turn foods into vaccine delivery systems. While there may be positive angles to this technology, we must take into account the long term goals of the establishment, which is already invested in the research and development of edible vaccine technology.

Edible vaccines

In 1996 the Rockefeller Foundation supplied grant money for early research on edible vaccines. The $58,000 grant, given to the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research at Cornell University, was aimed at developing and transferring edible vaccine technology to developing countries. Cornell University reports,

“Researchers at the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research Inc. at Cornell now will begin exchanging new vaccine information with scientists in developing countries, starting with Mexico, thanks to a new Rockefeller Foundation grant.
Gomez-Lim and his American colleagues will try to verify the value of “edible” vaccines and to begin educational efforts in Mexico to facilitate the rapid adoption of these vaccines for safe and effective use.”

Charles Arntzen, who served as President of the Boyce Thompson Institute, can be heard here explaining the use of bananas as edible vaccines in developing countries.

In 1998 the Boyce Thompson Institute became the first to develop genetically modified potatoes which were successfully tested on human subjects. “The potatoes were developed through a process known as transgenic implantation, in which a gene is transferred from one species to another. In this case the gene for a bacterial antigen — the protein that stimulates the production of protective antibodies — was inserted into the potato plant cells,” reports BTI.

The article continues,

“Children of developing countries may not be the only beneficiaries of this new technology. Says Arntzen: ‘American kids will also probably prefer being vaccinated by an edible vaccine rather than by a needle.'"

Edible vaccines - which have been given scant coverage in the mainstream media - received attention in the wake of the recent swine flu outbreak. Iowa State University research “…may someday allow pigs and humans to get a flu vaccination simply by eating corn or corn products,” reports ISU. “The corn vaccine would also work in humans when they eat corn or even corn flakes, corn chips, tortillas or anything that contains corn, said Harris.”

The prospect of delivering vaccines through food inevitably raises the issue of mass medication. Calls for statins and lithium to be placed in tap water have recently been made in the name of promoting “good mental and physical health.” A recent AP report stated that lithium, along with hundreds of other active pharmaceutical ingredients have already been found in drinking water. Mosquitoes are also being turned into mass medication systems. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently gave a $100,000 grant to a Japanese research program aimed at genetically engineering mosquitoes to act as “flying syringes” to deliver vaccines.

The Rockefeller family - and in turn the entire Anglo-American establishment - has a history of consistently supporting population control and reduction. David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, and other billionaire philanthropists met in secret in New York City recently to discuss this very issue. The meeting was secret, according to an attendee, because “…anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.” Research in the realm of biotech and edible vaccines, as openly stated in prominent medical journals, will aid this long term agenda. This same group, primarily the Rockefeller family and their various foundations, was instrumental in shaping twentieth-century science, from the molecular sciences to social engineering. Dr. Lily E. Kay’s seminal work, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology, documents this fact.

Past incidents

In 1989 research was conducted by the National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi India into the use of hCG conjugated Tetanus and Diphtheria vaccines as a method of birth control. The research discussed the use of Tetanus and Diphtheria ‘carriers’ to bypass the immune system and deliver the female hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). While hCG is required to maintain pregnancy, the injection of hCG bound to Tetanus Toxoid triggers an auto-immune response against hCG. The Rockefeller Foundation is listed in the document as giving grants for the research.

On November 4, 1996 the publication Vaccine Weekly carried an article titled “Study Suggests Women Were Injected with Contaminated Tetanus Vaccine.” The article details an investigation that was carried out by the Philippine Medical Association into the discovery of hCG in tetanus vaccines. Similar incidents have also occurred in Thailand.

Further evidence is found in a 1995 BBC documentary titled “The Human Laboratory”. The film covered the Philippines Tetanus hCG controversy in depth. The transcript for the program states,

NARRATOR: There are several research programmes around the world testing the contraceptive vaccine linked to tetanus which creates an immune response. The vaccine contains Beta HCG, part of a hormone necessary for pregnancy. This Beta HCG stimulates antibodies so that if a woman’s egg becomes fertilised her own natural HCG will be destroyed and pregnancy will not occur.

MARY PILAR VERZOSA: I began to suspect that here in the Philippines that’s exactly what’s happening. They have laced the tetanus toxoid vials with the Beta HCG. The only way I could make sure that they hadn’t done that was to examine the vials, and how to get a hold of those vials was going to be a problem. Who was I to collect them from the health centres?

NARRATOR: Sister Mary was helped through the Catholic network. A friend who worked in a health clinic removed the vials unnoticed. The nuns packed them with ice and sent them to an independent laboratory.

MARY PILAR VERZOSA: Oh boy that was really something when this came out of my fax machine. Report on HCG concentration in vaccine vials. Three out of those four vials registered positive for HCG, so my suspicions are affirmed that here in our country they are not only giving plain tetanus toxoid vaccination to our women, they are also giving anti-fertility.

“A socioculturally acceptable alternative”

Word has spread in the developing world of these documented cases, but these stories are dismissed as rumor by the United Nations and World Health Organization. Vaccination has been met with increased resistance across many developing countries. UNICEF reports from Ethiopia that, “All sorts of misguided rumours go round that the injections will sterilize them or harm them in some way. But here, the village elders are on board. They are here, encouraging the women to come along.”

Edible vaccines, according to the Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, will be a more socioculturally acceptable alternative to needles. In other words, people will be less resistant to eating a mundane banana than taking a shot in the arm. The Journal states that new edible vaccine technology may serve a dual purpose of birth control. As stated,

“Edible vaccines hold great promise as a cost-effective, easy-to-administer, easy-to-store, fail-safe and socioculturally readily acceptable vaccine delivery system, especially for the poor developing countries… A variety of delivery systems have been developed. Initially thought to be useful only for preventing infectious diseases, it has also found application in prevention of autoimmune diseases, birth control, cancer therapy, etc.”

The journal points out that, “There is growing acceptance of transgenic crops in both industrial and developing countries,” and that, “Resistance to genetically modified foods may affect the future of edible vaccines.” Indeed, GM foods are increasingly being presented as a solution to world hunger and food crises.

Will edible vaccines be used as a tool for birth control in the developing countries? The ability to do so has been demonstrated, and the agenda for population reduction and control has been admitted by the billionaire philanthropists who’s foundations are involved with developing the technology.

Left and Right drawn together by Fed

First of all, the news story is worth taking note of in itself:
Reuters - Federal Reserve puzzled by yield curve steepening

A good interpretation of this is provided by Global Research

But the main thing is, I wanted to link to two forums' reactions to the story, namely Democratic Underground (leftwing) and Free Republic (rightwing). Just because the general attitude is similar, but unsurprisingly the lefties seem to have more optimism for the economy with their puppet in 'power' right now. Oh yeah, Obama's fixing things. And Bush wasn't going to do any nation building.

Anyway, the odd unity between left and right can only be beneficial.

So let's remind everyone shall we:


YOUR SWORN ENEMY IS THE BANK!!!

The bank stole everything despite them producing nothing.
The bankers use their central banks to tax you invisibly via inflation.
They use their imaginary money to buy up real assets, buy off politicians and the media.
They stole all your gold decades ago in the name of keeping it safe.
And now they want you dead because you're a Useless Eater!