I bet she didn't expect to spend her last days like this, huh?

Disturbing video. This is why the state can't be trusted. The defenceless pay the price of socialism i.e. allowing the state to usurp the family/community as primary collective unit.



Don't worry that you might be spared this quality service; there are also plenty of non-immigrant dangerous people like this in the NHS etc. I'd feel about as safe in Tokyo right now as I would spending a day in a hospital bed.

Japan - Fukushima #3 smoking - possibly including Plutonium? - workers evacuated

"
Universal Concerns...

Reactor 3 raises the most concern since it runs on MOX or Mixed Oxide fuel -- a mixture of plutonium and uranium;

MOX is far more dangerous than uranium on its own; and

MOX is two million times more deadly than normal enriched uranium.

Reactor 3's recent smoke appears to have originated from the building's side, where the spent nuclear fuel pool is located;

The precise contents of the smoke and vapour at reactor 3, and other reactors, are as yet unknown;

However, workers were evacuated from the nuclear plant after smoke appeared from reactor 3;
"

http://www.businessinsider.com/japan-nuclear-crisis-what-about-the-plutonium-mox-2011-3

http://www.naturalnews.com/031781_Fukushima_evacuation.html

http://theenergycollective.com/dan-yurman/54083/fukushima-nuclear-crisis-unwrapped

BBC Demands Tribute From Americans - To Combat Censorship?

BBC World Service to sign funding deal with US state department

The BBC World Service is to receive a "significant" sum of money from the US government to help combat the blocking of TV and internet services in countries including Iran and China.

In what the BBC said is the first deal of its kind, an agreement is expected to be signed later this month that will see US state department money – understood to be a low six-figure sum – given to the World Service to invest in developing anti-jamming technology and software.

The funding is also expected to be used to educate people in countries with state censorship in how to circumnavigate the blocking of internet and TV services.

Full Article
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/mar/20/bbc-world-service-us-funding

(about as convincing as the BBC - source)

The 'Beeb', which has had to make cutbacks recently, is already propped up by the EU. Now America too? Guess this is from that big pile of money Hillary was talking about a while ago.

"Educate people in countries with state censorship"?

What, you mean like...Australia? Or right here?

No, didn't think so. Just other peoples' censorship.

Libya - SAS Troops On The Ground; UN Resolution Doesn't Prohibit Invasion?

Francis Boyle (not Frankie, UK readers, lol) says that invasion is possible due to the language used by the UN:



(Rebel celebrates NATO 'humanitarian' airstrike. The joke's on him though; he probably huffed DU dust from the explosion - he'll die of cancer in 20 years and his children will be born with their faces inside out)

Meanwhile SAS are already on the ground (well some of them did get caught by Gaddafi a while ago):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368247/Libya-SAS-smash-squads-ground-mark-targets-coalition-jets.html

The source said: ‘What is ruled out? An invasion. What is not ruled out? Everything else.

Typical. See, that is the language of freedom, when applied to the people. That "everything that is not prohibited, is allowed". But it should be the opposite for the government - everything not allowed is prohibited. Today however the inverse is true - government claims it has 'rights' and people have 'privileges'. Of course no individual ever claimed the right to go into someone else's house and settle domestic disputes by killing the least favourite belligerent...

Commonwealth, Common Propaganda

Identical speeches given by Aus PM and Canadian PM before Iraq war in 2003:



Who wrote it?

Militarism, Feminism and Statism: The Family Of Evil

"All wars are wars among thieves who are too cowardly to fight and therefore induce the young manhood of the whole world to do the fighting for them." - Emma Goldman

I thought I had this all figured out a few days ago. Militarism I mean. And, the plan was, I was going to explain to you - ta-da!...here's how it is. You want to understand militarism? Here you are.

My thesis can be summed up in a single sentence:
Women may cook for a man, but men will actually go to war for a woman.

You know, that's not really fair. It is partly true. But it almost implies war is woman's fault, which is not at all what I meant. I was planning to critique feminism again using this theory, by concluding that women have always had far more power than they are encouraged to think.

But then it hit me:

Why Are Boats Called 'She'?

Well, why are boats and other vehicles and whole countries often called 'she'? Remember that everything the State does is a carcinogenic, bastardised, plaigiarised, imitation of non-psychopathic/free humanity.

I have said before that in my opinion, feminism works by subverting the psychology of females so that they accept the state as a replacement for men. That feminists are women married first and foremost to the state.

I have said a long time ago, and repeatedly since, that the education system works by subverting the psychology of children so that 'mummy' and 'daddy' are replaced by Sir and Miss, and by extension, the state. The purpose of state education is to raise children who look to the state as their mother and/or father. The results of this are visible all around us, IMO.

But I have never really thought about the attack on males in the same way.

Is it that much of a stretch to say that militarism is, so to speak, feminism for men? That it creates men who view the state as, in essence, their wife?

Certainly militarism is a very sick, twisted and toxic form of masculinity. I think Kubrick had this covered in Dr. Strangelove.

But more than that, many men I think cling to "military worship" because there is literally nowhere else left. Society has been so androgynised, health and safety'd, softly softkilled, that it seems there are no outlets for "male-ness" that remain. (Oh, except football. But that's another story for another time.)

But WAIT! There is no hope you say? What, you want adventure? You want to be part of a band of brothers? You want 'action'? C'mere son! Here, just sign away! You get to be one of the 'only ones' who are allowed to be armed! We'll drop you into a stranger's land so you can help us exploit them, pronto!

See, the last thing they (the state) want you to figure out is that the truest male pursuit, the fight for freedom and justice and truth, is here at home against the state, not with them. And when I say 'fight', I of course do not necessarily mean physically - this is an information war just as Napoleon predicted - although I have the utmost respect for the militia movement. The point is that doing the dirty work of the state is only what you would want if you are some kind of masochist, or simply someone who was tricked - as we all have been - by the state's lies. It is no coincidence that the best freedom fighters are often veteran soldiers who find one or two things out after their service. This is why the state would rather as many vets as possible are sick, disabled, drug addled or dead; because to them, yesterday's asset is today's liability.

What is the cure for all of the above? Just, to acknowledge that the state is a myth, and it is not your big daddy or mummy or spouse. Break your Stockholm Syndrome for these evildoers in government who hate you because your very existence makes them look bad (not that that's hard to do). That is all.

Truth About Soy, Yeast Extract, Soy Protein, Soybean Oil, Soy Lecithin, Soy Flour

Crap. I knew soy was bad but didn't know how ubiquitous this stuff is under other names...

This 'Beloved' Food Can Cause Allergic Reactions for Years - and Infertility for Generations!

Soy can be found in almost every product on your grocery store shelves -- corn chips, ice cream, canned tuna and every packaged food you can think of. It goes under names like yeast extract, soy protein, soybean oil, soy lecithin and soy flour.

But soy is one of the top eight allergens that cause immediate reactions such as coughing, sneezing, runny nose, hives, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing and anaphylactic shock.

Delayed allergic responses can also occur several hours to several days after the food is eaten.

Full Article

Goodness, it says infants fed soy formula may as well be taking in five birth control pills a day. Hey, have you ever wondered if that might be a problem? I read an article a while back that the Chinese were having problems with feminised men in their army, lol. Over there it's probably a lot worse things than soy oestrogen. Regardless, there is a price for messing with nature like that.

Links 20/Mar/11

.
Total information blackout on Fukushima Unit 4 reactor raises serious questions about truth of situation

Israelis In Charge of Security at Fukashima Nuclear Plant

Mossad Virus 'Stuxnet' Found in Japan in October

Governments have been covering up Nuclear Accidents for fifty years to protect Nuclear Power industry

Why Libya?

More War Propaganda? Downed Plane Presented As Evidence Gaddafi Is Not Observing Ceasefire

The Great Anglo-American Gaddafi Deception

Libyan Hospitals Attacked

Gaddafi arms his people (wise move methinks, although if he survives this - if - he won't have the same power as he did eh?)

More from the lions under the throne...sheesh...freedom is slavery

80 people reportedly killed in U.S. drone strike in Pakistan ("others reported that the target was actually a tribal "jirga" or council of elders to resolve dispute over the ownership of minerals in the mountains")

The moment snipers opened fire on protestors in Yemen (obvious graphic content warning is obvious)

Wiesenthal center slams Sweden for 'Jewish tax'

New Oil Spill in Gulf of Mexico?

Proof That Leslie Robertson Saw Molten Steel at Ground Zero

The Real Reason Why There Is No English Parliament

There has been a resurgence of what could be called 'Englishness' in the last few years. With it has come the question, which I think is a fair enough one - "There is a Scottish Parliament, but why is there no English Parliament?"

(I love this picture I found. Regular readers will hopefully understand why. Subconscious? lol)

Sites like I Am An Englishman raise this matter and, I have noticed, seem to be keen on blaming the Welsh and Scots for this (they describe Tony Blair as "Scots-Irish", funny he looks like a demonic chosenite to me; he is actually half English and a quarter Irish-hebrew also if you look into it; Blair is only his father's adopted name), as if they are the ones responsible for England's status.

Well, there is an element of truth to their complaints. The grants given to Wales and Scotland are essentially bribes to keep those people favouring Union under the Crown, rather than Independence. And then, whenever someone suggests Scotland or Wales should declare independence, the same arguments come out from the Royalists - "Look at what we give you! Look at how lost you would be without us!"

Which is a total lie.

I mean, just think about it. If you can function now, you would function fine as a free country, if not better. The Crown just wants that Scottish oil. And they never give up their old conquests. Just like their relatives, who still claimed "their land" nearly 2000 years after being kicked out of it.

So that brings me to why there is no English parliament...really. Well let's say that tomorrow an English parliament was created. Guess what would happen? England and Scotland and Wales would probably drift apart and the Crown's evil Union would be done. The English royals would lose Scotland and Wales, and that oil.

So it is the English establishment (aka 'Br1tish Isr@el') that stands to gain the most by suppressing any English parliament. I certainly do not oppose English self rule - but stop passing the blame for why this has not happened onto others; it's childish.

Libya Intervention - QE2's African Cousin, Peace Prize and all

.