Three Jailed for Equipping Militants Overseas

From Reuters UK

Three British Muslims were jailed on Monday for sending equipment to militants fighting on the Afghan and Pakistan border.

The men, from Birmingham, had admitted at the Old Bailey supplying equipment such as computer parts, mobile phones and camping gear.

We can all breathe a sigh of relief that these dangerous citizens are behind bars. After all, if we hadn't given up our freedoms, we would be living under Sharia law right now, in 'Western Pakistan'. Ahem.

Just a little footnote, maybe we should be as anally retentive at ratting out establishment people who arm our foreign 'enemies'? (Or are you going to tell me the Western elite has never funded both sides of a war?)

The Unholy Alliance: CIA and Drug Trade

This is why it sometimes gets called the Cocaine Importing Agency. The ties to Afghanistan's opium trade are also evident, not to mention Al-CIAda...

911truth.org: CIA and other intelligence agency links to drug trade

(Image: CIA logo)

"In 1996, directors Chris Hilton and David Roberts released "An Unholy Alliance" as the second part of a trilogy of documentaries dealing with the global drug trade; with a focus on heroin and opium. The documentary offers a valuable history of the drug trade, with much rare footage, including footage of CIA favorite, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Since Hekmatyar is back in the news, now is an important time to remind people of Hekmatyar's dubious past, and his links to the heroin industry in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

ONLY the vaccinated died from Spanish 'Flu?

Original article

I first saw this on a thread over at ATS

(Image: WHO poster on Bird 'Flu. No, I did not do the editing, and as far as I know it still has not been proven to spread from person to person.)

Now, if the research is correct, the vaccines not only were useless, but in fact caused or assisted the spread of the deadliest pandemic of modern history.

Why is this relevant? Because 'they' keep getting caught putting live viruses into our vaccines today (or are they 'accidents'?). So I wish I knew what I do now, when I was taking my vaccines aged 11 or 14. I won't take any more damn shots, not 'even during a pandemic', but 'especially during a pandemic'. Paranoid? Maybe. Rational? I think so.

EDIT: This article says that Spanish 'flu was caused by a vaccine for paratyphoid. Again I quote an on-the-spot observer, "As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated."

Cannai

That's what you'd be left with if you took the 'bs' out of 'cannabis'.

But instead, the UK Government's Frank campaign has decided to double down on their bets, and warn us of the terrible dangers of 'cannabbiss'.



It has been upgraded from a Class C drug to a Class B, despite it never having killed a single person. Now, you may be wondering, why do I care? I don't smoke weed. Point is;

a) this highlights the immorality of the entire drug war - 'we will stop you from putting this substance into your system';

b) this demonstrates the hypocrisy of our drug laws - cigarettes and alcohol kill thousands of people a year, but they aren't banned while cannabis/marijuana, which doesn't directly kill anyone, is;

c) it also shows the lengths government is willing to go to in order to persuade people not to use a drug that is outside of their control. Cannabis is grown in the attics of council houses, while the genuinely dangerous drugs are grown in fields in Colombia or Afghanistan and shipped here by the establishment (oh no conspiracy theorist alert!).

For the record, no I do not advocate the use of cannabis, nicotine, etc. Get 'high' from life, not from a substance. But do I care whether someone else wants to smoke a spliff? No. They make their own choices.

More to the point, the deadly and expensive drug war drains our resources, fills our prisons and condemns generations to life under criminal gangs. Let's end drug prohibition.

"You wanna get rid of drug crime in this country? Fine, let's just get rid of all the drug laws." - Ron Paul

Gaming Good for Children, Study Says

Apparently

Story at IT Pro Portal

I am not going to be a hypocrite. I am a gamer. But, in all honesty, I do not believe the findings of this study. I hear about the new generation of zombie children (just a metaphor, before you reach for the shotgun) who have played videogames from a young age, maybe 2-3 years old onwards. They tend to be characterised by their lack of verbal communication ability, and 'hyperactive' or aggressive nature. (And then our lovely social workers give them ritalin to 'calm them down', but that's another story.)

So am I skeptical of the 'finding' that videogames are good for children? Yes. Is that skepticism heightened by the long history of declarations that something is 'good', only for evidence to emerge the original claim was bull? Yes Yes Yes.

Look at, for just one example, the infamous American news report on two studies which found mercury to be beneficial to children (ahem)



For more information on mercury toxicity, try diagnosismercury.org

So these conflict-of-interest studies that 'prove' something to be safe, are not to be trusted.

Spy Agencies' Computer Project "Scrapped"

What the...? They are building less databases? Don't worry, concerned sheeple; it'll only be temporary. Normal 'service' will resume soon to save you...

(Image: Straight out of 1984. Nothing else needs to be said. Also, everything to do with the police state seems to be worse in London. Or maybe they're just ahead of the curve, so to speak.)

According to the Guardian

"A multimillion-pound computer project designed to improve Britain's security by giving key government officials speedy access to secret intelligence on terrorism and other threats has been scrapped in a move described as "appalling" yesterday by a watchdog of senior MPs and peers.

The damning criticism is contained in the annual report of the Intelligence and Security Committee, which is studded with asterisks hiding facts and figures needed for the public and parliament to know what MI5, MI6, and GCHQ are up to. The committee says it is appalled that a significant phase of the project, called Scope, on which "tens of millions of pounds have been spent" has been abandoned because of technical problems. Serious failures with the computer system were revealed by the Guardian last year, but the committee says it had not yet investigated the reasons."

...

"A limited version of the project, called Scope 1, is up and running after a two-year delay. It enables MI5, MI6, and GCHQ to communicate with each other more quickly and securely than before. They can call up the latest intelligence within 15 minutes rather than waiting 12 hours."

I couldn't believe that they used the word 'secure' to describe a network. Maybe they've got some new secret unbreakable security software? (sigh) They seem to have developed a habit for leaving 'sensitive' documents on trains, unless of course the recent flurry of data losses was deliberate for some other purpose - I'm not psychic...

Point is, less databases is good. It's a no-brainer from the citizen perspective. Now let's stop them from filming us all day, reading our emails and site traffic, telling us how to live, etc. (not putting any money on it happening!)

Land of the Free

Land of the Free is a 10 minute film depicting what it calls 'the first day of the second American Revolution'. Ex-police/military choose to oppose a DHS mission to detain families.



Hopefully it won't come to this. That's why political figures like Ron Paul are so important, to avert the catastrophe before it happens.

A Few References to the NWO in the media

Some of the less well 'remembered' media moments. Ignore at your own peril.

CNBC: "A bunch of wrong-footed moves by Hank Paulson and the Illuminati" (oops!)



Gordon Brown wins contest for most paraphrases of 'New World Order' in one speech



Dwight D. Eisenhower: "The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist" - well it's not that subtle. He was right too



George HW Bush: "When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this New World Order...in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders."



CNN's Lou Dobbs: "...it's a New World Order they're gonna create, and they're trying to do so not only without approval or consent of the governments of these countries, but despite the popular will."



John F Kennedy blows the whistle on secret societies. Who other than the Illuminati could he have been talking about? Also, he tried to shut the NWO agenda down by striking at its source of funding, the central bank fraud system. This was a possible motive for his assassination, see here.

These are the people screwing you

Financial collapse, World Government, and the destruction of freedoms are going on right now. Those responsible have been kind enough to leave us a paper trail record of their evil as it develops, all the way back to the 18th Century.



Are these the descendants of the original Bavarian Illuminati? Are they masons (or did they hijack Freemasonry)?

You probably believe that in a 'democracy', anyone can become a leader. As did I. But it seems many US presidents, British PMs, royalty, big business and government heads are related. Not surprising, you may say, but the lack of prominent people who are not part of these 'bloodlines' is notable.

Bush, Obama and Cheney are all cousins (Obama-Cheney 8th cousins, Obama-Bush 11th cousins, Bush-Cheney 9th cousins once removed) [see what these numbers mean here]

Huffington Post: Obama cousins with Brad Pitt, Hillary cousins with Angelina Jolie (what it doesn't mention is that he and Hillary are also cousins, meaning that Brangelina were already related before they met...)

Other Obama cousins: Ronald Reagan, Queen Elizabeth II, Jimmy Carter, the wife of Harry Truman, Jefferson Davis (Confederate President during the American Civil War). I'm too lazy to source them, so google any of those if you don't believe me.

Bush cousins with John Kerry and Hugh Hefner

And for something a bit closer to home, and a bit more - er - esoteric...
Daily Mail article on Gordon Brown's lineage

[talking about a member of Brown's ancestry] "he died, aged 48, in 1929, and from then the firm was run by her very capable and much-respected elder brother Gordon, who was also a Freemason."

Bah; masons, politicians, banksters, whatever, these people have a taste for inbreeding. And they sometimes suffer the genetic consequences of doing so.

American Soldier Stands Up For Freedom

Must watch this video if you believe in freedom.



I hope no violence ever comes to pass in the removal or temporary subduction of the New World Order agenda. But being realistic, violence on some scale will occur.

I've been thinking...America is the only developed country able to stand against such a tyranny, because of the large proportion of people who are armed. Whereas Europe is toast before anything has begun, unless the armies and police refuse to obey (I am not quite as optimistic as the above soldier on this, but it's reassuring to hear at least someone in uniform standing up against the NWO).

The first 'battle', whether physical or not, will be fought (or should I say 'is being fought') in the US. If the police state there succeeds, there is every chance similar methods of attack will be used this side of the Atlantic against the unarmed populace, and they will be successful providing the uniforms obey. In the end, that is what it comes down to - will police and military obey the orders to round people up etc.? (especially if there is a national emergency eg bioweapon 'terrorism'?)

The more soldiers like this there are, the better the chance is that the answer to the above question will be a resounding 'no'.