H1N1 Vaccines, Round Two. + Wider (RFID?) Needles in Canada

THE VACCINE RETURNS...AND IT SHOULD GET THE SAME ‘TREATMENT’
This time swine flu vaccine is ‘hiding’ in the seasonal flu ‘shot’ - beware

"Just 1 flu shot needed this year
Covers 3 influenza strains, including H1N1

It's that time of year again: health workers in Ottawa are gearing up to deliver this year's version of the annual flu shot.

Last year, the seasonal flu vaccine took a back seat to the massive innoculation campaign against swine flu.

This year, experts are predicting a more typical flu season, with a difference your arm will thank you for.

"We won't have two vaccines to give you; we'll have one," said family doctor Janet Dolan.

Another improvement over last year is a safety needle that prevents health-care workers and curious children from accidentally getting pricked.

Overall, getting the flu shot will be simpler this year than last year, said Dolan.

"Last year was crazy. We had a lot people come in worried about that extra shot," Dolan said.

This year's vaccine will cover three influenza strains: a new one known as H3N2, an influenza B component and H1N1.

Ottawa Public Health stressed that even if you got both shots last year, you need this year's version.

"We're facing a different situation, and that's what so unique about influenza," said Dr. Nadine Sicard. "It's an unpredictable disease. It changes constantly. It likes to mutate so it can infect people again. So, this is why we have a new vaccine every year."

Public Health is in the process of delivering the new vaccine to family doctors, with a wider rollout of vaccination clinics scheduled for November."

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2010/10/07/ottawa-flu-shots.html

TAKE NOTE OF THAT "SAFETY NEEDLE". That is I presume the wider needle that can be used to deliver RFID chips. Use your brain ffs, why would they change the needle. I know this is just in Canada, but the wider needles debuted last year in Holland, although as far as I know there is no evidence that wider needles have been used elsewhere.

Still, out of all the vaccines, and you can be as pro vaccine as you like on some things, flu vaccines are the most damnable. They have been shown again and again to not reduce, and sometimes increase suceptibility to influenza. Even the 'sciencey' pro vaccine types are backing off supporting flu vaccination.

Personally I think there may be a case for something like measles vaccination, but due to what I have discovered with regard to who or what is in charge of all this, I am against all vaccination full stop. They're just bioweapons.

Isn't it funny how the most vaccinated, most medicated people, are the most diseased and the most unhealthy? Or is it just because they're unhealthy that they need vaccines and drugs? What came first the chicken or the egg? I think the egg came first, it was used to make vaccines, which fundamentally compromised the immune system of the chicken and led to it requiring long term medication for various diseases for the rest of its life.

I tried to explain all of this last year to my grandmother, bless her, who gets yearly flu vaccines; I told her about the mercury, about the lack of evidence that they work, about the link with dementia, about how they weaken the natural immune system. The problem is, when someone is still under the control of the system, it just goes in one ear and out the other; the poor woman nodded, agreed with me, then said "well I still think I will get mine to be on the safe side". I know it's the year on year flu vaccines that are sapping grandad's cognitive abilities, but there's nothing I can do about it. I know what these eugenicists have done to these lovely, much better than me, innocent people. Bastards.

One day things will change.

My RFID Bracelet Is Like Soooooo Cooool...

Even if you think I am basically a loon for discussing global conspiracies etc on this blog - if you aren't at least wary of the RFID then it's time to WTFU ASAP!!!



Bloody facebook generation. And I'm allowed to say that, I'm part of it...lol. The generation I mean, not facebook; why would I want to be part of that MILINT data mine.

School Fingerprints Children Who Borrow Books

Seeing this stuff happen, while in full awareness of where the game ends, is surreal

Children, 4, 'to be fingerprinted to borrow school books from library'
by Andrew Hough for The Telegraph

Students in Manchester are having their thumbprints digitally transformed into electronic codes, which can then be recognised by a computer program.

Under the scheme, pupils swipe a bar code inside the book they want borrow then press their thumb on to a scanner to authorise the loan. Books are returned in the same way.

Full Article

"Machete": Provoking A Race War?

Film depicts Mexicans going 'across the border' to machete the 'racist' white people

First of all check out Son3's post on this.

There is definitely an agenda afoot to use the racial division to provoke outright hostility between, in America's case, latinos and whites. And it's not much different between arabs and whites in "Eurabia", or in other words the mass immigration of arabs into Europe.

No I don't think banning the burka is a wise idea, by the way, neither do I think Arizona's new immigration law is going to help. See, they could already deport illegal immigrants, without having to do racial profiling and stopping random people going about their business. (The problem is the police are complicit with illegal immigration in the first place, they need to stop their complicity and actually deport people rather than looking the other way - they do not need any new powers to do this, you see?)

And it's going to turn nasty, like this from Seattle:
U.S. police in 'Rodney King' beating of Mexican as officer is filmed stamping on man's head

The point is, it takes two to tango. Alienating latinos by passing racial profiling laws like the one in Arizona won't help. It gives the impression that whites and the police are siding against the Mexicans, us against them, see? That is the basis of world control. There are forces behind this, i.e. the state and the social engineers, who want nothing more than to cause chaos here, in order to offer their 'solution', which means more power for them.

I would suggest that brewing immigration wars are an ideal pretext to push for ID cards or microchipping...after all, if you're a 'legal citizen', what have you got to hide?

Airport Naked Body Scanners: Useless, Perverted, and Orwellian

So...
They do take a pretty picture of your, or (even better) your child's, genitalia.

They would not stop even a non-CIA underpants bomber.

They store a 360º nude image of all who pass through, violating child porn laws and any sense of human decency.

They blast you with radiation that increases risk of cancer.

And the people manning them are perverts with small dicks.

Anything else to add? I mean, maybe you should be brain scanned before boarding a flight to make sure you aren't having any dangerous thoughts? Microchips could prevent people from entering unauthorised areas of the airport. Perhaps the infamous Taser Bracelets ought to be mandated in the name of security?

With a little imagination there are infinite possible ways to make you more safe as you travel. And every one of them might prevent a possible dangerous incident, so they must be implemented immediately...

Oh, you don't want that much police state?

So there is a line that is too much?

Where is it then?

Draw it out in your mind.

... See, it wasn't long ago that underwear bombers were the object of satire. Now the government needs them to implement the next stage of the creeping police state. Look back and see how far we've come, one step at a time...and all based on lies...

The Pre-9/11 Mindset

Speech Before the Arizona Libertarian Party Convention
by Claire Wolfe

April 19, 1997

In November, 1995, I sat down and wrote the words, "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." That's a line a lot of you have become familiar with, and to the extent that other people have also become familiar with it, it has a lot to do with Arizona libertarians pushing that message.

Well, I wrote that a year and a half ago, the book was published about six months ago, and now here we are, April 19, 1997. Is it time to "shoot the bastards" yet? This is a question a lot of us have been pondering.

We signed our oath, most of us, we signed our pledge not to initiate violence. We're the good guys. We know that. But I have heard so many people — good, responsible, ordinary people — talking about whether we might be reaching the time that we should "shoot the bastards".

I think one of the best comments on this came from Vin Suprynowicz, who interviewed me when the book was published. Actually, of all the things said in the interview Vin made the best comment; he said that we have reached the time when it is morally right to "shoot the bastards", but it is not yet practical to do so.

I do believe that a fight is inevitable, whether that's a fight in the streets or the trenches, or whether that is some sort of confrontation that may not involve arms but may nevertheless involve violence and head-to-head action. I think that's inevitable, and I think more and more people are coming to the conclusion that it is.

April 19th, as you all know, is a day in history when many people have taken up arms, when they have been forced to take up arms. Peaceable people in Lexington and Concord, desperate people in the Warsaw ghetto. Even when they had no hope, or little hope, they took up arms. But here we stand, and although a lot of us have arms with us, or not far from us, we're not ready to "take up arms" yet. But I hope we're preparing ourselves. I hope we're at least thinking about it. In the last year and a half, since I originally wrote those frustrated, angry words, things have gotten a hell of a lot worse. And it's almost scary how little the disaster that we're in the middle of has been acknowledged.

For instance, just four — I don't want to call them laws or acts of legislation — four abominations that Congress has come up with in the time since I originally wrote those words. We've got a federal database of all employed people, or, that is, all people who get conventional jobs. That's been done in the name of "tracking deadbeat dads". However, you might be a single mother with five kids you're taking good care of; you might be a single guy who never intends to get married. You're going in that database. Why? What does that have to do with "deadbeat dads"? I don't know. I can't figure it out. Along those same lines, we now have pilot projects being started, under which you cannot get a job unless your employer first gets permission from the Social Security Administration by scanning your card through a reader connected to a database in Washington, DC. Isn't that cute? Some Social Security bureaucrat decides whether or not you can ever get a job in this country.

We've also got a medical health care database that will be on line in about a year. This was part of the "moderate" Kennedy-Kassebaum health care act — you'll be pleased to know that this is "moderate". Everything about your medical history will go into this database, including speculation on the part of your doctor, who may observe that you're an "armed and dangerous wacko". He's not going to tell you that, but it goes in your records and goes in the database.

The fourth one that is really for me the "line in the sand" issue is the national ID card that we have just begun to hear about in the last couple of months. Has everybody heard something about that? Well, for the few who haven't I'll just review quickly.

At the end of the 104th Congress there were about two paragraphs added into several hundred pages of legislation that requires that by October, 2000, all states will be issuing driver's licenses that you must have your Social Security card to get one, and they will have certain "security features". These are not defined in the law, but they may include: retinal scans; fingerprint scans; other data on your driving history, health history, criminal history, so on. (NOTE: The U.S. Secretary of Transportation is currently in the process of writing the regulation on this.)

And by October 2006, you will not be able to get any government service at any level without having one of these driver's licenses. You will not be able to get a passport. If your local utility company is the government you will not be able to get water to your house, or electricity to your house, and so on. My Christian friends, of course, are calling this the "Mark of the Beast", and I don't think they're wrong. I think they're right.

So those four things, among many, many others, have all been snuck in on us lately. But the reason I pick these four is something that a friend pointed out to me. This friend says, "These four are slave laws." Many other laws that have been imposed upon us recently are bad laws, but these are slave laws. They all enable the federal government to track its property — you, and you, and you, and me — its property.

They can monitor our health just the way that farmers monitor the health of their cattle. If they don't think we're being properly productive they can deny us the jobs, or they can make sure that we're in a job that they like. It's here, now, that we have to stop this. I hope we can stop it without violence, but we do HAVE to stop it.

What I'd like to focus on today are some things that I think we as individuals can do, and some of the things that I think that libertarian party organizations can, or perhaps should, do to prepare for the hard times that are going to come when the day arises that we say, "No! It stops here! It stops now!"

I wish for just this little moment that we were all a bunch of Marxists, or Democrats, or something, because then I could say, "Comrades! You must do this! Comrades! You shall do that!" But we're libertarians, and it's only, "Hey! You'll do what you want to do; I'll do what I want to do. You'll do what fits your personality; I'll do what fits my personality." And that is the way it has to be. That's our strength and our weakness.

But there are a couple of things that I would say that I think everybody here, and everybody who professes to be a libertarian should do. One is to get the income tax out of your own life, however you have to do it. Get it out! In every other presentation I've ever given before I've said, "Oh I understand that if you have a regular job, or if you have children, or if you have a lot of nice possessions it's riskier for you to do it. But I'm coming to the point where, I'm sorry, we can't feed the beast. We've got to stop feeding it. That's all there is to it. All of our great professions of principle in the world are nothing if we don't stop paying the ATF, paying the FBI, paying the IRS.

The other thing that I hope everyone will do is resist this national ID in some way or another. Refuse to get the driver's license, drive without it, whatever you have to do. Refuse to give the information, protest, scream, rescind your social security number, whatever.

Rescinding your social security number is another thing that I would have said a year ago, "OK, it's an option, but it's a grandstanding option. It's waving and saying, 'Hey, hey, I'm a troublemaker. Put me on a list.'" But I am going to be rescinding my social security number formally, writing to the Social Security Administration and saying, "Nope. Not my number, folks." It may be a grandstanding gesture, but that number is a slave's number, and I'm getting rid of it, pure and simple.

Now a lot of people — a lot of people here — are doing these things already. I know people right here in this group who haven't paid taxes in years. I know people in this group who don't have a driver's license, who have rescinded their social security numbers, or whatever, and I think that's great. In fact Rick White came up with a really good term the other day when we were talking. He talked about "individual secession" as a means of combating the government. We were talking about ways of avoiding violence, and he suggested "individual secession" as a means of accomplishing that. I think it's great, and I think we all need to do it.

But I also think that the result of quiet secession — of just quietly withdrawing your consent, your support, your participation in the system — the result of that is something like what happened in the Soviet Union. Eventually the system collapses, but what's left? You have black markets. We like black markets, because they're free markets. But they are corrupt markets that are run by gangsters, eventually. We need free, open markets. We need to declare freedom and live it publicly, instead of by hiding.

I think individual secession is good, but we need to make noise doing it. And not polite noise. We libertarians are very polite people, very well-mannered. We sign our little pledge, and we do the right thing, because that's the kind of people we are. But we need to make noise. We need to say, "I'm withdrawing. I'm withdrawing, and here's why, and come get me."

And that goes against everything I personally believe. One reason you never heard of Claire Wolfe until six months ago was that although I've been an activist, I have tried to keep a low profile and tried to be really quiet, because I didn't want the IRS knocking on my door, or kicking it down as the case may be. I didn't want the ATF coming in to say hello at four in the morning. But I don't care any more. I do not care any more, and I think we're coming to a confrontation point anyway, and if that's what happens, so be it. I think there are a lot of other things that you can all do and probably all are doing; probably a lot of you are ahead of me. That's why I like coming down to Arizona; I learn from what people in Arizona are doing. But certainly, withdraw to the extent that you can from the banking system.

Set your political priorities — don't waste your time on things that aren't working. Like for me, I was always always sitting down writing stupid letters to my congressperson, as if my congressperson cared. I felt like I was doing something. But one of the things I've learned since those days is to do is prioritize. And that means don't even bother any more. Don't even talk to them any more.

I think everybody should be studying warfare, in one way or another. Whether that's the personal warfare of going up to Gunsite and learning how to shoot in combat situations or whether that's studying The Art of War, reading books by Mao, or Che Guevara, or Sun-Tzu. I think we all need to be doing that, even if we don't want the confrontation. None of us want the confrontation, but I think we'd better be prepared for it in those ways.

I think we should all be getting out of government jobs — with one exception. With one exception, and this is something I've just been thinking about. I've decided that over the last thirty years some wonderful libertarian has been running the IRS' computer system. And I say, "Thank you out there, whoever you are, and keep it up! Good job!" So anybody who's in a position to do unto the ATF or unto the EPA what has been done to the IRS, definitely go for it.

One of the things that we can do, whether we're looking for confrontation or not, is to establish some virtual communities. And here's where Michael Voth comes in. Michael of the Coconino libertarians, and Kevin Burt of the Laramie County libertarians of Cheyenne Wyoming, cooked up this notion of "cousin counties."

You know how we have "sister cities" all around the world? Well, we now have a "cousin countyship" between Laramie and Coconino libertarians. We don't exactly know what we're going to do with it yet, but we have our own "virtual community", and it is somewhat of an act of…well I don't think we care enough to defy the national hierarchy, but we're going to make connections despite the hierarchy.

Some day we may need a "safe house" in Coconino; some day they may need a "safe house" in Laramie County. Some day we may need to be stations on an underground railroad for getting patriots to safety. We may need to be stations on a supply line, and we have that connection established. We have a relationship with each other already, and we'll do what seems appropriate with it.

That, unfortunately, brings us to the national party, or higher-up-the-line parties. I think — and this is just a personal viewpoint — that the best thing that the state party could be, or the best thing that the national party could be for individual libertarians is a support group to help us establish networks with each other; to help us keep connections with each other; to help us learn from each other; what works and what doesn't work; what did they try over in Alabama that might work in Nevada, or that was a disaster and might not work anywhere?

Your state organization is great for that, I think, to the extent that I know it. Unfortunately you're one of the few that is. And unfortunately, of course, we have National. The national party. The commissariat of Washington, D.C. What is the national party? It is a top-down fund-raising organization that is into telling us what we should do, not learning from us and helping to spread it around.

And certainly some of the things that we should not do, according to National…we should not have people like L. Neil Smith at our gatherings. He has been declared "unfit" by the national party. And I hope you all recognize that. [Applause for Smith, who was sitting in the audience.]

Also, a year or so ago, those of us who got the "Libertarian Volunteer" got an issue that listed the "twelve most terrible things" that have ever been done at local party meetings. One of them was to discuss "Should There Be A Libertarian Party?" I mean, that's shocking. How dare we talk about such a thing?

So here we are at a time when we need individualism, autonomy, quick action and networking, being saddled with this sort of dinosaur with the little pea-brain up here in Washington, DC, trying to communicate down to us, thinking we're its tail or something. They are so busy trying to be like the other folks in Washington, D.C. that they are very quickly forgetting that they are libertarians.

But I'm sure they're quite good at fund-raising; I've hear wonderful tales about their fund-raising. In fact, something quite interesting that I heard the other day indirectly from Neil: Harry Browne is criticizing me as one of the people who was damning him for his fund-raising and odd campaign spending practices. Well, I never did. I would have. I would have been happy to, because of what I have heard from Vin Suprynowicz and Neil Smith and other people. But it didn't happen.

So, National is giving us enemies lists and fund-raising corruption, among other pleasures of politics. Heck, they're headquartered in the Watergate, after all! What are we going to do with these people? They think that success is raising a lot of money whether it goes to any good cause or not. They think that success is being invited to the cocktail parties with the Democrats and the Republicans. They think that success is having libertarianism favorably mentioned in the Washington Post.

OK, if I were favorably mentioned in the Washington Post, I would do everything I could to change my ways! Wouldn't you? Who wants to be favorably mentioned by people who think that every bit of dissent is hate speech? Who think that anyone who is not a Republican or a Democrat or in the mainstream is some sort of crazy? No. No thank you. Hunh-unh. No thanks.

We try very hard to be acceptable. The national party is trying to be acceptable and there's nothing wrong with that. It's human. I mean we want to be accepted from the moment we're born. But the question is, to whom do we want to be acceptable?

I don't want to be acceptable to the same people that the national party wants to be acceptable to. I want to be acceptable to you guys. And I want you to be acceptable to me, because we are going to need each other some day. I want to be with you when we prepare.

I don't care whether you're preparing even for the same eventuality that I'm preparing for. I don't care if you're a pacifist. There is room for many differences. But we've got a role to play, and it's we, not national, who are going to play that role.

Something is going to happen. I wish I could tell you what it was. I've been talking to people and everybody's going through the same thing — "Well, I think it might be this", "I think it might be that", "I think it might be the other" — we don't know. But it's coming. Whether it breaks with the suddenness of an earthquake, or whether it comes like a storm that you can see rolling toward you for hours, it is coming.

And the big question for all of us, when this hits, is, "Do I want to be polite and acceptable or do I want to be FREE?"

Free, of course! I mean, it's easy, right? It's easy! So let's do it! I have absolute confidence you guys are going to be able to do it. And when it all comes down, I want to be here, if not physically in Arizona, I want to be in your virtual community.

So thank you for your guts. And thank you for having me here. And thank you for being brave enough to talk about things that National doesn't want you to talk about, and to do things that National doesn't want you to do. My congratulations and gratitude to all of you.

© 1997 and 1998 Claire Wolfe.

http://gos.sbc.edu/w/wolfe.html
Claire Wolfe archive

Louis Theroux: Survivalists (1997)

If you're British then chances are you've seen this on TV at some point. Louis investigates survivalism in America. Includes interviews with Steve Quayle and Bo Gritz. Unfortunately it also throws the (not very intelligent) neo-Nazis into the mix as well as the legitimate anti-NWO people, but that's the inevitable nature of the MSM's spin. Most importantly, it demonstrates that some people saw all this coming a long time ago.

ps: I know Louis is a pansy, but ignore that. Unfortunately his reactions to the idea of guns and real freedom are typical of us Brits :(

1: Steve Quayle and Bo Gritz


2: Constitutional Covenant Community


3: Almost Heaven Too


4: The Racist End Of Things (Aryan Nation)


5: It Won't Be Us Who Started It

And No Man Shall Be Able To Buy Or Sell

Lest he hath received this mark...

BBC - Tiny chip could diagnose disease

(And look who is doing the research, it's the little Hitlers at IBM, which I swear stands for I Bury Masses, a tribute to their wonderful technology that helped inmates of concentration camps the world over get pretty numbers on their arms...yep, that was IBM. Genocide. IBM. Genocide. Don't forget that. That's what they mean by 'building a smarter planet'...even their ads subtly refer to eugenics! True evil is bold, in-your-face, and still gets away with it.)

http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/

Anyway, the story is that microchips inside the bloodstream could diagnose disease more efficiently. Aww, now these chips are really friendly and one of them is named George and the other is named Jessie and did I say they were really friendly? Don't worry, you can keep them after you're done seeing the doctor. Aww.

Radio
Frequency
Identification
Device

= Cancer and Slavery

Info on a recent H1N1 vaccine 'blunt needle' controversy...some suggested the only reason wider needles were being used in some places was so that chips could be placed in the needles...just something to be aware of as a possibility... click here

http://blog.puppetgov.com/2009/09/14/orwellian-tech-erasing-civil-rights-raising-h1n1-vaccine-questions/

Heck, you only need to look to the Georgia Guidestones...

"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature...
Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature."

There's your smarter planet - genocide and 'sustainability'...but then I repeat myself.