"Austerity" Scam: European Nations Begin Seizing Private Pension Funds

I don't have a problem with austerity according to the dictionary definition, especially on a personal level.

I also previously described localism as a solution to the globalism in our world today. However, David Cameron's "Localism" is a deceptive way to name what is basically the next phase of the NWO's grinding down of its subjects. "Austerity" is a scam to loot from the people in order to "balance the budget". There will be no real cuts in the military spending (on immoral foreign wars rather than legitimate self defence), and there will be plenty of cash for vaccine schemes and for CCTV systems and other police state projects, the very things that could really do with cutbacks.
_______________________________________________________________

European nations begin seizing private pensions

People’s retirement savings are a convenient source of revenue for governments that don’t want to reduce spending or make privatizations. As most pension schemes in Europe are organised by the state, European ministers of finance have a facilitated access to the savings accumulated there, and it is only logical that they try to get a hold of this money for their own ends. In recent weeks I have noted five such attempts: Three situations concern private personal savings; two others refer to national funds.

Full Article (with the not-so-subtle embedded links to "Europe's most generous pension systems", as if the people deserve to have their pensions, that they paid for, stolen)
________________________________________________________________

A lot of the anti-Austerity people are Commies, I will grant that. I don't agree with them. It's a one-two punch. The fabian socialists get everyone dependent on the system to begin with, and then when Cloward-Piven point approaches, the 'free market' crooks descend like vultures to complete the looting of the wealth of the people, claiming they are undoing the work of the socialists, when in fact from a bankster perspective they are simply finishing what the 'left' started.

(Don't forget that, at least in the UK, citizen contributions to the state pension fund are FORCED. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Insurance. So they force you to pay into a scheme then say that you have to embrace "austerity", and steal it all from you.)

I'm not saying it was a good thing that people went along with any of the aspects of the welfare state - but once on, there is a right way and a wrong way off. This is the wrong way. Maybe there is no other way, as "austerity" adovcates will tell us more and more I'm sure. But if that is the case then we must acknowledge that the government and their banking-corporate crony partners are stealing pensions that ordinary people have faithfully paid into, and that last time I checked, theives are supposed to go to jail.

There is one other way. Shut down the usourious basterds' central banks, issue debt free currency, and cancel the ludicrous, unpayable, fraudulent national debt, most of which is to the central banks anyway. Take the byrden of these currency wizards off our back then see if pension scheme recipients can be paid well enough for their contributions. If the results Hitler acheived by taking Germany off of debt-usury money are any indication, I think we'd be fine. That was the one good thing Hitler did, although it was for the wrong reasons as he wanted to build Germany up to be an Empire. Enough Empires. Enough of them!

(PS Corporate welfare will of course continue unmolested. Keep believing the right wing wants to free you.)

Love/Hate Mail and the Left Right Paradigm

Source

"It's a tragedy that you have 118 followers. [note: it's now 117, "Nocturnal Hermit" aka "The Propagandist" abandoned his blog suddenly (link) after reporting he had received death threats.] That's potentially 118 people being sadly mislead by a person who thinks that using words like "retarded" (no matter their lame attempts to legitimise the use of the word; no one's buying it) are kosher.

More tragic still, is that most of those followers are no doubt concerned by imperialism and globalisation - as you pose as a dissenter of both - yet lead astray with perfunctory and facile lines along the lines of "there's no difference between right and left, only levels of control" (or whatever).

Anyone with the first clue about political science and political economy can see how patently obscene that is. You should be ashamed of yourself for corrupting with such absurdities whilst posing as a sage."

First of all, the left right issue. Look here. One the one side we have Nazi Germany. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide. That is *right wing*. On the other side we have Soviet Russia. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide (a fact that the Communist education system tries to minimise). This is *left wing*. Now am I really all that wrong in saying the left-right paradigm is an instrument of pointless division?

Communism IS globalisation. Communism openly states its goal is a global revolution...it's just not the one you are thinking of. Funny that the forces of imperialism, corporations and the military state, are also looking towards this goal, globalisation. You only oppose one half of globalisation not the other. What's more, any attempt to reassert national sovereignty would likely be condemned by your sort as being Racist or Fascist!

I don't 'know' much of political science or political economy. I don't know what they feed you in your textbooks. All I know is, there's a group of insane supercapitalists who run our government and run the wars and promote Fascism and Communism which are in practice very similar.

I called the students retarded because I pity them. They have indeed been 'held back', retarded, by the deliberately dumbed down education system. Retarded is the precise and correct word for this situation. But those imperialists, those corporatists, who run the wars and the military industrial complex and the banks, they couldn't possibly also run the education system could they? They couldn't possibly bankroll Communism could they? Could the same grand planners be behind murderer Che Guevara and murderer Milton Friedman?

Divide and rule. Works pretty well with these ludicrous nationalist vs antifa pantomimes on the street. Who is talking about the central bankers and their debt slave usury money that runs your life? I am, hell the whole internet is thank gawd, and they are not. (Did I mention the existence of a central bank is enshrined in the Communist Manifesto? Why's that? Not very proletarian...or revolutionary...)

How much time did the education system take to tell you about how all our money is created as a debt that we have to pay compound interest on? I can honestly say, zero, myself.

Cameron U-Turns on Promise of Lisbon Treaty Referendum

He's a smooth liar.

Here is 'Dave' before the election:



Like Obama, his campaign slogan was 'change'. Har har. (And we didn't ask him what 'change' meant, just like the Americans didn't ask Obama. What do you want to change?)

Like Tony, he's another Common Purpose cardboard cut-out.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/208589/David-Cameron-U-turn-denies-Britain-EU-referendum

Re - "Curb Stomping"...

Just thought this was a good time to reflect on who is more inclined to violence. While I do not personally support much of the right wing tea party thing, I dislike the Soros zombies more. Their inclination to violence, their blind fanaticism, their dirty tricks, their hypocrisy. They are the most hateful ones, yet they accuse pretty much everyone else of hatred. In fact that's all they do.





Take away racist sexist homophobe hate-speech privileged green Jeebuz diversity change progress and I'm not sure they'll have much else to say; their dictionary will be empty.

I had to link to this. That's the mentality! Insane!

Right Wing Zionist Frenzy at anti-mosque protest

The British Israel Apocalyptic Sarah Palin Christians are being whipped up to ever more hysterical extremes. Look how they threaten the innocent black guy because he looks a bit like a Muslim.



Only the Nazis, or the AshkeNazis, could be responsible for this.

Mosque supports Hamas.

Is that even factually correct, much less relevant?

After all I thought this was about the mosque.

Not some regional political dispute in the eastern Mediterranean.

What an attention whore.

As usual, all the MSM world's a stage, and all the men and women on it - yes even the Muslim ones - are merely players.
Ground Zero Mosque Imam is Globalist Stooge

The UN sanctions enforced with Western air power killed one million Iraqis even before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, including 500000 children. That, ladies and gentlemen, is genocide.

So Muslims have every right to be angry at the West. I only hope they are much more discriminating than UN sanctions are. And I am no supporter of Islamification, and I believe the demographic crisis brewing in (primarily) Europe will be a disaster unless the course is changed. But honestly, when someone wants you to fight the Muslims, and view the Muslims as your primary enemy, the first question is how do they benefit from that.

Put two and two together ffs. It's really very simple.

The enemy of your enemy is not, in this case, your friend.

And the royal banksters sit on top of the piles of dead.

Yaaaay! PM David Cameron

Hurrah! Gordon is gone. And with him goes all of that anger that everyone was feeling towards the government (who benefits?) - nah, needn't bother now, everything's fine. Although...

If you think Cam is going to Change anything that you really want changing, you haven't been paying attention.

This is Alinsky crossing the Atlantic, only a right wing flavoured version. Underneath they're all fascists, 'socialist' or 'conservative' matters little in the grand scheme of things.

Vote for Change makes about as much sense as F*** for Virginity!

Cameron was always the choice from the start. Although I admit the last minute talks did make me hesitate a little, I have to say there is little doubt he was the insiders' frontman. He got the slick media treatment. He got the fancy slogans, the smooth PR and the internet campaign. Although he didn't get too much of it, no, too much would have ruined the chaos of the hung parliament. In fact I did suspect a couple of months before the election they eased off the Cameron PR to give Gordon a chance.

In case you haven't noticed, since most people are under the corporate spell (TV Programming), elections are as easy to control as a Simon Cowell talent contest. The voters float around, wondering what the hell is going on - or, worse, not wondering at all in some cases - and they vote for whoever the (supposedly) wise man gives the most compliments to, flitting to and fro on the most momentary of incidents, like "Bigotgate" (which should not have been a surprise to anyone by the way).

So who is Simon Cowell in the political field? Well, this election it actually is Simon Cowell, since he endorsed Cameron, but usually it is Rupert Murdoch. Or, more broadly, the brain devouring MSM as a whole.

I am not above falling for this myself. I am ashamed to say it was my foolhardiness in allowing myself to be hypnotised by Soros-Alinsky-Obama, followed by the utter obliteration of Hope afterwards, that finally deprogrammed me out of the corporate false reality, thank God. New bloody lease of life.

So I do not look down on those who expect good to come from the Eton chap and his Bilderberg attending, coke sniffing chancellor George Osborne. It's not your fault. You wanted to believe. But behind closed doors they all get together and laugh at us for our stupidity, because they know what we don't, that they are just frontmen, PR faces for the real brotherhood regime.

So turn now from Cameron, admit you were wrong, and you'll look clever later on when everyone hates the Etonian, probably because he will bring in the IMF to relegate us to third world status just like Greece. And no, you're not going to get any of your lost liberties back, not from him.

Anyone who swears loyalty to the lizard queen makes themselves an enemy of the people by default

Don't Vote; It Only Encourages Them

by David Icke

"I watched Labour Party supporters cheering wildly whenever their candidates were announced to have won their seats when that party in government has been responsible for killing and maiming millions in wars justified by lies; has ceaselessly and viciously imposed an Orwellian police state; and has removed regulation from the banking system and then thrust upon the country astonishing levels of debt to bail out the banks amid their unregulated mayhem.

And here were these programmed people – computer terminals – cheering when another of this shower was elected back to parliament. But they wouldn’t compute the sheer lack of logic in their slapping palms because it is not about what is right or just – it is only about winning."

Full Article

Rothschild pet Mandy knows the truth:

Bill Maher becomes a "Teabagger"

At first I thought I wouldn't like this because it would probably be just a leftist cheap shot. But he makes a good point about empire, actually.

Scurry Back Into Your Holes - Fear Controls You

It's like herding animals. You can't herd them in fact, they must herd themselves, voluntarily.

Much of the perception of 'societal breakdown' that is going on, is designed to get you exactly where the game planners want you to be. They can't force you, not all of you, that is impossible. They can however manipulate you so you relinquish your freedom by choice.

For a perfect example, look at the two-party system, it's genius and perfect, as long as people don't have the knowledge to see through it. I have been watching the US health-care stuff lately, what a load of crap that is. Current system run by insurance monopolies, and the 'reform' merely forces everyone to buy insurance. Not that I like socialised medicine per se, but that is even worse than socialised medicine if you ask me.

But look at how it divides people. Look at how the process makes people scurry back into their little narrow left-right mindset. And because it's an all-out dogfight, oh you must do everything you can to stop/pass healthcare, anyone who steps out of that narrow left-right 'accepted area' and takes a broader look at things, they aren't doing their part to stop Pelosi or to stop the insurance companies. The freethinkers get the blame, eh Rush? Cheers, Fascist!

But the game is designed to be all-consuming. Drop everything and fight the healthcare issue now! Back our political party, it's the lesser of two evils! (No such thing)

It's happening over here too. How many times have you heard things like,
"A vote for the Lib Dems is as good as a vote for the Conservatives." (common Labour party talking point at general elections past and present)
Not that I like the LibDems (or indeed the LabCons) at all, but the point is that the polarised, who-will-win, it's-going-down-to-the-wire mentality cons people into thinking they must, urgently, support what they perceive to be the lesser of two evils. The path of least resistance. You social engineering propaganda geniuses! It works too.

And when you take a breather from the charade, take a step back, and ask yourself who really benefits from all this, then it becomes more clear. In the health 'debate', drug companies win either way; the current Western medical system is based on deceiving people about how to be healthy so they suffer perpetual illness which can be 'treated', but not 'cured'. At least, hopefully not 'cured', since that would mean no further profit can be extracted from you...how disappointing, nobody likes the chicken that doesn't lay eggs...

Yes, fear controls this global human farm. That's it. That's all that holds this system together, at different levels.

Fear sends people scurrying, sometimes reasonably, for cover. Much as Londoners hurtled into Anderson shelters during the Blitz, so people hurry to the nearest apparent safe point. The churches. Political parties. Leaders. Salvation.

But be careful, make sure your mental Anderson shelter isn't going to be locked from the outside once you dive in there. Your psyche imprisoning itself of its own volition. To escape the sheep dog, you ran into the sheep pen. Mind control and black magick.

The church says, No Heresy!
The political field says, No Conspiracy Theories!

And in the church, if you never breathe a mere syllable of Heresy, you succeed, go places, become respected. But the moment you breathe syllables of Heresy, no matter how truthful, you are cast aside because you don't serve the agenda. So everyone knows that to be successful in the church, you must never utter Heresy. Self perpetuating mind control.

And in the political field, if you never utter a word of Conspiracy Theories, you succeed, go places, become respected. But the moment you do start uttering about Conspiracy Theories, no matter how truthful, you are cast aside because you don't serve the agenda. So everyone knows that to be successful in the political field, you must never utter about Conspiracy Theories. Self perpetuating mind control.

THIS is the Matrix.

What if some of the things they call heresy and conspiracy theory, some of them, were the very things you need to reclaim your freedom? What if the norms they set give you a choice between tyranny with delusion and delusion with tyranny? What if the vast majority of the population are held in line by such things, entirely of their own volition?

Or to put it another way,

What if the 'hole' you are scurrying headfirst into, is your own arse?

"Karl Rove, You Are A Bad Man Sir"

Jeezus check the YT comments on this one. Why can't some people see that whoever you vote for, the government always gets in? Anyway it's a good video - enjoy.



Some of the delicious wingnut reactions to this:

"You care about the state of the economy? Are you planning to protest Obama's spending, too?"

"These commies cry about a war that their leftest hero's allowed to happen. (Clinton, Gore)"

"How can conservitives be fascists when a former true fascist. George Soros is contolling the left? Funny how uneducated you are."

"It's funny that this same crowd despises those evil "teabaggers" who are protesting for conservative values, but find the same tactics (on steroids) perfectly acceptable. LIBERAL HYPOCRISY."

If you don't understand that many people, more than you might think, are both anti-war (pro-freedom) and anti-socialism (pro-freedom), then you need to ditch the corporate news ASAP. All of it. Fken FOX, BBC, AlJizzear, all of it, just unplug the matrix. Left and Right is a sham and a shell game, both camps as eager to violate your rights as each other.

George Soros is a crook.
Karl Rove is a mass murderer.
And I actually like the Tea Parties even when "Freedom"Works is astroturfing them into something that they weren't originally. It's a lot better than nothing.

Speaking of Tea Parties, Hannan wants to start them over here. Mixed reception followed, but hey it's interesting.

Who Got The Tea Parties Started?

If you don't already know this, the answer will surprise you. And no it's not some rightwing Fox business pundit.

Click here

Ron Paul vs Fascist Ex-Bushies

Really summed up by this comment (see full article here):

Were I a part of Ron Paul's base of supporters, I'd be alternately laughing and seething at the GOP's attempts to co-opt the energy of the RP/libertarian movement; their symbols, their linguistic identifiers, their oxygen. 'Course, the libertarians aren't alone in that experience. Digby has documented the Right's appropriation of many of the symbols and linguistic identifiers of the Left, too. Not unlike the rattlesnake that appropriates a prairie dog's burrow, the Right takes what others have built, and chameleon-like change their colors to support their apparent familiarity to those they wish to attract. In that way, the GOP has become a political parasite and dependent on unwitting or unwilling hosts. Their own agenda is so bankrupt it can't survive in the marketplace of ideas on its own.

I sure hope you're right about this.

For that reason, it's only a matter of time before the fundamental incompatibility of the "tea party movement" and the political party cynically exploiting it is exposed.

I think that's true for Ron Paul's core supporters, but I'm less optimistic about the ability of those more recently recruited by the libertarian poseurs like Glenn Beck. It'd be a delicate waltz for the Paul cohort to allow Beck to promote the principles, while hoping those recruited that way are sufficiently discriminating to recognize Beck, and others like him, for the frauds that they are.

"Pro Defence Libertarian"

I have come across this kind of phrase, in various forms, being used by many ex-Bushites since that ship thoroughly sunk during 2007-8. Other variants include the less common "Pro War Libertarian", and some people use the phrase "Economic Libertarian" to hide their war fetish.

We need a modern version of Simon Wisenthal (sp?) hunting down alleged Nazis who went into hiding after WW2. The Neocon Hunter, haha...

So what exactly does a "Pro Defence Libertarian" stand for? Well, they're a 'libertarian' except that we need a massive military state to protect us from Cave Dwelling Donkey Riders by invading their country. Because the Cave Dwelling Donkey Riders hate us for our freedom, so drones must bomb their weddings incessantly, which will help to alleviate extremist attitudes amongst Muslims.

Funny how everything the state does has the exact opposite effect of what it is 'supposed' to do, hmm? It's why libertarianism appeals in the first place. Because the state is the greatest thieving mass murderer in existence. No 'libertarian' can logically support thieving and mass murder. Remove your sheep's clothing and admit you're one of Tarpley's "neocon fascist madmen".

Pro Defence means Pro Attack. A strong national defence in where? AfghanIraqistan? How is it national defence to attack entire nations? Ah, but the terrorists could be anywhere, right? That's the propaganda. Pro defence. 1984 is a bloody documentary today.

Look at the history of how the word liberal became corrupted. It used to mean what libertarian does now, but of course some manipulative thugs took the word liberal to camouflage their socialist agenda. All of a sudden it was liberal to have political correctness, liberal to have huge taxes, blah blah...

Now it is 'libertarian' to support war. Hah! The true libertarian understands that the primary source of violence in the world is the state, and that only by shrinking the power belonging to the state, especially (not except) the Warfare State, can peace and therefore freedom and prosperity thrive.

Obama can save Presidency...by Bombing Iran!

Oh dear God have you listened to this piece of $hit talk about Iran. He says conservatives will, and I quote, "swoon" for Obama if he orders an attack on Iran. The case for war with Iran is even dumber than the case for war with Iraq. Support the troops, not this cocksucker who wants them to go and die. To adapt some military terminology, he's kind of like the ultimate REMF.

"Just as 9/11 caused voters to forget George W. Bush’s meandering early months, a strike on Iranian facilities would dispatch Obama’s feckless first year down the memory hole and transform the domestic political scene...

"It would sideline health care, prompt Republicans to work with Democrats, make netroots squeal, independents reconsider, and conservatives swoon."

The bloodlust is strong in this one!

In the event of any irrational, stupid war with Iran, Pipes can saddle up first. Put his kids in the firing line. But he wouldn't do that...some are more equal than others, eh?

As for any of you soulless bastards who would honestly 'swoon' at such an action, you make me sick. It's people like you that get decent men and women killed. Flag wavin' morons.

By the way, don't rule out the possibility of staged terrorist attacks on a scale greater than 9/11, if it really looks like Obama won't hold down the people for four years so the tyrannical baton can be passed to someone else. I'm just saying, be aware of the possibility. Don't jump to conclusions if it does happen. Ask, 'who benefits'?

Glenn Beck, remove that knife from the peoples' back

And be kind enough not to twist it on the way out

We know that Al-Qaeda is start to finish a CIA operation, Beck. And so are you. Neither you, your scum boss Murdoch or your handlers at the Pentagon can defeat the people.



What, don't you think these 'commies' Beck warns you about wouldn't be smart enough to infiltrate places where they could do real damage, like, uh, the national security apparatus? They wouldn't be smart enough to drag a nation to war in a land known as the Graveyard of Empires, as part of their Cloward-Piven strategy to load the nation with debt? They wouldn't be smart enough to pay off 'terrorists' via Pakistani intelligence to play the part of 'Al-Qaeda', which is in reality no more than a database of CIA Mujahadeen assets from back in the 80s?

Side note: Robin Cook used to be a high ranking UK government official, who resigned over objection to the Iraq war. He wrote this article in which he says Al-Qaeda was no more than a CIA database, then unfortunately died about two months later of a heart attack while out in the country.

Beck knows 9/11 stinks to high heaven. Just like O'Reilly knows about JFK. They would never tell you though, because they are paid a hell of a lot of money to read a teleprompter just like the President is! You think you're going to get the truth out of a MSM $hill like Beck? No, you're going to get propaganda, just repackaged and more subtle, since most of you don't fall for the overt Hannity style demagogy anymore.

Cover a turd in just enough truth, so that for a while people don't realise it's the same turd they had rammed down their throats for the last 8 and a half years, ever since the act of high treason that was 9/11.

It is impossible to reach one unless you first begin with Zero

Parts of the CIA (not even close to the whole thing, there is a legitimate CIA too as ex-CIA man Ray McGovern says) are simply criminal elements within the US. Drug running, gangland connections, aiding terrorists, media manipulation, illicit research, even assassinations. But no, it's all Saul Alinsky and WUnderground. These 'Radical Marxist' nobodies have about as much to do with the economic collapse as Islamic Terrorists had to do with 9/11.

Pin the blame on the donkey.

Just like Marinus van der Lubbe, the unfortunate retard who was executed for starting the Reichstag Fire.

It is all such asinine bullshit.

How do people get into Hitler/Stalin apologism?

It's an odd thing, since they were both undeniably brutal dictators. But if you look far enough on the web there are people who will defend, to the last, these men. Like they were their own family.

(It must be hard having to step over all those corpses to get up the aisle, hmm?)

Remember, how do you get people to go along with evil? You supply a problem, which generates the desired reaction, causing the subject to warm to the 'solution', which is in reality not a solution at all but what you wanted them to go along with.

See, with those who defend or apologise for Communism in general and Stalin in particular, it seems to be about capitalism and inequality of wealth. The problem. This causes the reaction, which is a demand for the use of force on a massive scale to rebuild society in a 'more equal' manner. This is the solution.

Via this worldview, Communism almost becomes merely a naive failed experiment. Many leftists have a soft spot for Communism because after all, if it was done properly, it would be ideal. Right? Then throw in some nostalgia partly supplied by pop culture and Che, airbrush over gulags, secret police and genocide, et voila - Comrade Stalin is merely a well-intentioned hero of the working class who has been sorely miscast by biased capitalist Western history.

We can play the same game with the Hitler apologists. With fascism the problem is cultural degradation, usurping racial groups, and a lack of order, pride, direction etc, among the nation/people. The reaction is therefore a demand for the use of force to restore perceived ideals like racial and cultural identity, patriotism, pride, and a hostility to outsiders. Solution.

Again, whether they admit it or not, many right wingers have a soft spot for fascism. They generally turn a blind eye to military corporatism, believing it to be essential to build a strong people capable of going into the world and smashing skulls. Which must be done, even if unprovoked, because without this the society cannot prove itself to the world and to the pages of history. They also have sympathy for racial purges and racial segregation, on the grounds of purity (even today, look at some peoples' proposed immigration solutions).

The other thing regarding specifically Hitler apologists, is they see the Jewish people as a collective to be blamed for the undoubtable human suffering caused by, at its root, the manipulation of money for the ends of a few. I don't give a damn if every money changer is Jewish like the Rothschilds (actually they aren't, the Rockefellers for example aren't Jewish). The fact is that ordinary Jews are opressed by the very same system as everyone else. This does not detract from the heinous crimes of political Zionism, which alongside some strains of Islamofascism is as close as one can be to a modern day equivalent of National Socialism.

If, however, you believe all of the world's 12-18 million Jews are the problem, then I guess making apologies for Hitler is pretty easy. Just wash over the Gestapo and everything else, also the fact that Hitler staged a terror attack on one of his own bases, blamed it on Polish terrorists before attacking Poland (clearly showing the Nazis aimed to start a war) and aggressively pursued Lebensraum in the East, essentially by ethnic cleansing and genocide - ignore all this and Hitler becomes a kind of hero of the opressed white people, who only has the bad reputation he has due to the meddling Jewish writers of history.

Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were, in practice, mirror images of one another.

See, here I am suggesting individual sovereignty, I must be crazy! No use of force to fix society? Outrageous. How would anything get done?

The true message of libertarianism is not utopian as some accuse; but anti-utopian, in the sense that it does not support the idea that violence is necessary in order to acheive a utopian vision, whether communist or nationalist or whatever else. "Freedom is more important than someone's good idea." Defend yourself by all means, but otherwise live and let live.

Wisdom from Ghandi:
"The ideally non-violent state will be an ordered anarchy. That State is the best governed which is governed the least."

"You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty."

A few disclaimers:
1. I know this post is Jewish propaganda which besmirches Herr Hitler.
1a) I know the ADL are anti-free speech, by the way, and that is very wrong of them.
2. I know this post is Western capitalist propaganda which insults Comrade Stalin.
Bases covered.

To all those about to elect Cameron

He's, like, so different to the previous puppets.