I Support Scottish Independence

Saw this nice post at Aangirfan about how the Scots would benefit from independence.

Now it's not simply Scottish independence from London, they also would need to avoid the EU, which is of course run by the same people who run London and thus would benefit from a fake Scottish independence from the UK only for Scotland to be held under EU control instead.

Also, it's not as if it's a one way street in terms of resources. Scotland and northern England are heavily dependent on government schemes, which is a problem I believe will disappear pretty quickly should we or any place be capable of removing the banking oilgarchy from power. However until then, that is our vice.

I like Scotland and I may be part Scottish myself. My mother's side of my family is Celtic in appearance and I have some relatives who live in Scotland, but they moved up there, and so I don't know if they are Irish or Scottish originally (Co. Durham as many parts of England had a lot of Irish migration during the Crown genocide in Ireland; many DLI medals from the late 1800s were awarded to Irish born soldiers, for instance).

My father's side of my family is Anglo-Saxon as far as I can tell. They have that Anglo-Saxon eccentricity. Yes that includes my coal mining, WW2 fighting, Anglo-Saxon grandfather. ZGR wouldn't believe me. :)

Anyway, back on point, it's nationalism as I said that will overcome the international bankers' control system (in any country). Crude, yes; simplistic, maybe; but sometimes a blunt object is the only one that comes to hand, and that's just the way it is. Ultimately I support the somewhat idealistic but nonetheless excellent vision of secession.net, to secure true self determination.

I'm seeing a lot more flags flying locally in recent times, and not just because of the World Cup. Maybe I misread that sign when I thought it was just football oriented - maybe it's a good thing. The nation still sleeps but its subconscious is just starting to awaken. The people may appear 'fat and happy' (for now) but they are starving for real information.

Well, aren't you going to feed them? ;)

The Young Nationalist

This local lad has definitely travelled the road less politically correct.



To be honest I post it only because he's a Mackem; if he was a Newcastle fan then I might not have, lol. (of course I have my priorities in order, what do you mean?...haha) And if you can't understand anything he's saying, then tough! :P

I can't go further without pointing out that it's important to have your facts straight if you're doing a video like that. For instance, Goldman Sachs is not a person...

Anyway it's a good opportunity to analyse my criticisms of British nationalism in general.

See, first you've got the watered down 'kosher' version of nationalist, who like Geert Wilders or the EDL loves Israel, and the proto Marxist anti-family gayists, while only opposing Islamification. Not saying that shouldn't be opposed, but let's deal with the causes as well as just the symptoms hmm? I agree with this lad on that point: Zionism (aka Communism, same people pushing it) is far more powerful and far more dangerous than Islam, although both are contributing to the fall of the West.

The second BIG criticism of British nationalists is their either approval of or apathy towards the Royals, and the occasional embrace of what I consider to be the poisonous doctrine of British Israelism and associated pro-Masonic, pro-NWO, supremacist ideology. They were the real Nazis, a bunch of London agents provocateurs led by a quarter Rothschild, Adolf. The biggest Zionist of them all, by the way, sits on the real 'throne of David' - not in Israel, but in London. What, you think the Brith-ish bluebloods are British? English? 'White'? LOL!

Of course, the biggest risk posed by 'bad' nationalism is a tendency to divert attention away from the handful of inbred interbred banking families and towards some poor slobs who have been invited here by the inbred interbred crime families, bribed using the welfare state, to cause trouble. It's not really their fault either. I find many nationalists to be not as well learned re the monetary system, compared to the more PC Alex Jones anti-NWO types. But I don't want to come across as arrogant or judgemental, it's just my opinion. There needs to be a spread of awareness about central banking in this country like there has been in America recently.

I won't take any nationalist group too seriously unless they support the abolition of the monarchy, and the dethroning of the Crown Corporation (pirate ship tax haven London square mile), the Bank of England and the entire aristocratic framework. No more landed gentry/landless peasants game. Take their land which they took from us in 1066, and give it back to the peasants. (Maybe to any fleeing South African farmers who need somewhere to go.) That is real nationalism, as in concern towards the people of the nation, not the criminal British Israel Masonic 'nobility' that holds this nation hostage, the ROG, Royal Occupation Government, haha. Let them bugger off to China (I'm really sorry China) if that's what they're planning.

I do believe, however, that principled and genuine nationalism, and a populist attitude, is what will allow the people to overcome the money magicians. In any country.

I have the one four whiskey on my desktop but I don't hate anybody. May all 7 billion plus cast off the shackles. Wherever possible, make the peasant your ally not your enemy.

PS: Found this 'gem' while looking for a picture to put on this post...

Oh, boy. Even 'speciesist' is there. My immune system is extremely speciesist and slaughters bacteria and viruses every day, just for the crime of being different - it's like a microscopic Holocaust. Down with my Nazi Fascist immune system! Stop this Discrimination. No justice, no peace! Nazi scum off our streets!

Poisonous little children of Lenin.

They know not what they do.

A Flag For England? (Not For Royal British Israel)

Flags are important things, you know. The joys, hopes, sufferings and character of a tribe mapped out on a rectangular piece of cloth. A symbol of a common bond you could say.

Until recently if you asked me which flag I regard as being the one representing my nation, I'd have an easy answer - the St George's cross of course.

There's just one problem with that. Have a look at the fair points made about that flag here, then get back to me.

Knights Templar. Masonic checked floor. Usury. The Bad Guys.

Now I don't completely agree with that site's statements about the English people, to me it sounds a little supremacist (and I don't use that word lightly like some pc muppets might) considering the role the English aristocracy has had in exploiting first the English people in feudalism, then the Scottish Welsh and especially the Irish people, then large parts of the world during the First Rothschild "British" Empire (the Second being the less formal but more successful Rothschild "Amerikan" Empire).

So I don't know, I'm somewhere between the assessment of the English made by that site and the assessment made by the ZGR that basically the English are children of Satan, I guess. I am not self hating. My grandfather was an ordinary coal miner but no Bevin Boy, he fought in Italy unwittingly for the evil throne of "David", against German lads also fighting - even less wittingly - for the same evil throne of "David" via a one time visitor to London and big time Crown provocateur called Adolf.

I digress. Point is, is there a flag that represents England without being a symbol of oppression towards the English people (a symbol of Norman-Vatican conquest and subsequent feudal serfdom, and immoral Crusades, and an occult Templarist symbol)?

I'm not a fan of dragon flags or any kind of symbolism like that. Those symbols - the dragon, the lion, the serpent, represent the royal bloodline families as far as eye can tell. The lion is the symbol of Judaism yet is also the symbol of the Royal British Empire, and Christians in Rome were thrown to lions, go figure. The dragon and the serpent just make you think maybe David Icke has a point, but whatever they really represent they are all over the place in royal heraldry, corporate logos etc. Exploitation again.
Besides that, there are no lions and very few serpents (unless Icke is right of course, lol) in England, just grass snakes which aren't exactly dragon-like. What the bloody hell are they doing here? The lions surely belong to Africa, and where is it the Komodo dragon is from - ah yes Indonesia, thank you wikipedia, even though you do obscure and lie about many things.

If we're talking animal symbolism, what about the wolf? Humans identify with dogs and wolves because we actually have a lot in common. Certainly humans in their natural environment (ie not the convenience corporatocracy we live in today) share a lot of behaviour with wolves, and wolves occasionally raise human children as one of their own. Wolves were an indigenous English/British animal, not that I support the nutjob anti-human 'animal rights' idea of reintroducing them into the wild over here like they are in America, of course. The British Bulldog is I suppose a reasonable animal symbol, but it just makes me think of dogfighting (and not the courageous Fighter Command kind).

The flag I currently have on this blog is an unofficial flag for Northern England. Since it malforms the evil cross of St George*, I consider it suitable. The Scandinavian cross represents the Viking connection to the North-East, and say what you want about the Vikings, they weren't that bad at all in my opinion; it was Vikings who made one successful free society - Iceland, which is one of the oft-cited examples of individualist anarchy 'working' by modern anarchists, the other of course being Ireland prior to the Crown takeover and desecration there.

I don't think you need to be a genius to figure out why I never really have been a fan of the Union Jack. Uh, can you say 'royal tyranny' and 'involuntary assimilation of the Scottish, Welsh and Irish people'?

So in short England was feudally enserfed in 1066. In truth, despite many fake revolutions and fake freedoms, we have never turfed the bastards who did it out! And to make matters worse they have now intermarried for centuries with other non-European elites and hence they want their British Israel NWO global feudalism. That's not the only paradigm to view modern events through but it is one that makes a lot of sense out of the senseless.

British Israel..."Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land". There is little to no evidence to support its assertion that Brith-ish people are a lost tribe of Israel, or indeed that Saxons are Isaac's Sons. It seems to be an ideological cover for the fact that the English elite, how should I put this, aren't completely European. Also note that in the chart above Jews, ie ordinary Jews, are only given a passing mention which reflects the reality that they have at times been treated like crap, especially if they remained in Europe and didn't go along with the Zionist gameplan to force-move them all to Palestine. Remind me, who promised Palestine to both Jews and Arabs before WW2? Now that's not going to cause any prob-oh wait...

Okay, maybe flags aren't that important. Some think we should discard them because people fight over them. I think anything that makes people willing to fight would be as much of a blessing as a curse today, but then what do I know. The most important thing is what the fight is for, truly. If I thought this nation was unrecoverable, or even the whole human species was unrecoverable, then what is the point of 'living'. It's all lies and the truth is the ordinary human being is incredibly powerful, hence the constant attempts to suppress and control by any means.

The English people don't need a flag as much as a g't big slice of humble pie (sorry but banning guns does not make us 'more civilised' you morons), perhaps a slap in the face with a wet fish, which will slap them out of their korporate kommie kontrolled stupor and maybe then we'll get round to figuring out what the hell happened and who's doing it all to us and what a bunch of crooks and cowards they are, they are terrified of us simply becoming aware of what has been done. Where's the fire coming from? Who benefits?

*of course, I don't view people who have a different opinion of the St George's cross or indeed the Union Jack, even, in a dim light. It could be that I'm wrong and we should embrace these symbols as ones that once represented our oppression but are now a badge of honour and unity - but either way the real history of the symbols must be known first. Which, quite clearly, is not the case today.