"Hero's Helmet Saves Girl's Life"

Brave man. Bring the troops home, as their sacrifices are being made only to support a criminal regime in Afghanistan, and the Crown's precious opium trade of course. Don't let people you know join the Army, I talked at least one person out of it when I was at 6F, and back then I didn't even know that our gov was running the drugs, I just knew the war was a lie for many other reasons, eg that Karzai is as bad as the Taliban who NATO forced out of power. (And only later I learned how the Taliban in 2000-01 were clamping down on the opium trade - ulterior motive.)

I have great respect for the soldiers, however their good intentions are totally manipulated, and just like the rest of us who have been under MSM brainwashing, they believe absurd things, such as the myth that they are fighting to free Afghanistan or Iraq, or fighting terrorism, when in fact the MI6-Mossad-CIA spooks have been behind most Islamic Terrorism including 9/11 and 7/7.

Hell, Mossad admits they knew 9/11 was going to happen since they sent their crazy Dancing spooks to "document the event" (a direct quote from one of the spooks afterward). Just search "dancing israelis". See the simultaneous drills going on during 9/11 and 7/7, which just happened to be on the same targets at the same time, thereby giving ideal plausible deniability (eg if a 7/7 bomber was caught with explosives they could just say it was part of the training exercise and no-one would bat an eyelid). Now if that doesn't sound your alarm, then you have been stunned beyond repair by the nightly NLP hypnosis we call 'news'. The cover up proves the crime.

"
HERO’S HELMET SAVES GIRL’S LIFE

A HEROIC British soldier was back on patrol yesterday after taking a bullet to the head rather than risk an Afghan girl’s life.

Lance Corporal Craig “Murf” Murfitt, 25, spotted a Taliban fighter on a rooftop in Helmand province using a 10-year-old girl as a human shield.

Although the rifleman and medic had the insurgent in his sights, he did not pull the trigger out of fear of hitting the girl.

However, the insurgent shot at L/Cpl Murfitt who survived only because the bullet ricocheted off his helmet.

The girl took her chance and fled and the rifleman’s comrades from the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment shot the insurgent.

L/Cpl Murfitt, who is looking forward to returning to his wife Erica and baby son, Finlay, in Barnstaple, Devon, next year, was in a Warthog armoured vehicle sent to help an infantry unit pinned down by the Taliban.

He said: “Our heavy firepower seemed to bring the fight to an end. Everything was quiet but then I spotted three men with a child on a compound roof.

“Two moved off, leaving one with the child – a girl, no more than 10 years old. The man picked up a rifle and moved behind the child, taking aim at me. I knew I could take him down but I didn’t want to run the risk of killing a kid and undoing all the good work we’ve achieved.

“So I waited, hoping the child would drop down and give me a clear shot.”

But the Taliban fired hitting L/Cpl Murfitt on the side of his helmet, knocking him to the floor.

He said: “I felt the dent in my helmet and said, ‘I’ve been shot in the head but I’m fine.’ I tried to stand up but I had disco legs and just had to sit down again.”

L/Cpl Murfitt was back on patrol later that day, providing support to British troops and first aid to locals.

An Army spokesman said: “The actions of this rifleman, who took a bullet to save the life of a child, show the difference between British courage and Taliban evil.”
"

Original Article
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/218421/Hero-s-helmet-saves-girl-s-lifeHero-s-helmet-saves-girl-s-life#ixzz18fnhMrRd

("Private, that is vital intelligence on the status of the "Taliban" poppy growing operations. I'll pass this up to my superiors. Don't destroy the crop, it will harm relations with the locals we are bombing")

("Hey dude, why do the spooks want to look at these drugs?"
"Dunno man, they say they'll dispose of 'em properly")

(a Warthog APC)

I linked this version of the story, as the other MSM versions of this account I read did not explain what happened afterward. I admit, having read the much more limited story from the BBC, I presumed that when the Taliban fired, and the Brits fired back "from a Warthog" (light APC), the poor girl would have got filled with half inch holes along with her captor. Thankfully this version of the story lets us know she ran away. Well you would hope so anyway.

Rhetorical question: why do all the media reports on stories like this let us know every detail about the individual act of heroism, yet do everything to shield us from the reality of war, i.e. death? Why not let us know that seconds later the other guy got blown away? I'm not saying he didn't deserve it, for hiding behind a child, my point is that war reporting is, like military recruitment propaganda, always very very 'sterile', and tries to cover up the patently obvious, that this man and thousands of others have been tricked into risking their lives in the sand not just for nothing, but actually to support the very people who are soft killing them and their families back home.

If you really really want to fight, how about moving to Cornwall and kick starting Cornish secession. Hahahaha. Or liberate the Six Counties. Or Scotland or Wales. If you really must fight, at least insist on a good cause first. The only good cause is freedom (i.e. self determination), and sorry, but you will never fight for freedom as a soldier of the Queen or of a covert Colony like the modern day US, or Canada, or indeed Israel.

While We Bitch About Precipitation...

They would trade bullets for snowflakes I'm sure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=058fJm81ZTI

There's at least one 'geordie' among them, the one who describes enemy positions at 2:20. By that voice I'd put money on him being from Wearside.

Troops out ASAP, before the government austerity them to death.

Once Upon A Time...

Once upon a time, Iraq had the finest education system in the Arab world.

Once upon a time, Iraq exported its expertise in education to many countries.

Once upon a time, Iraq was considered by the UN "illiteracy free."

Once upon a time, Iraq led the Arab world in scientific development.

Once upon a time, Iraq had the most modern and efficient highway system and public transport facilities in the Middle East.

Once upon a time, Iraqi women could dress however they desired: in sweat shirts and jeans, in mini-skirts, with stylish fashion, or, if they preferred, with a veil.

Once upon a time, the Iraqi public listened to rock and heavy metal music.

Once upon a time, professional and amateur sports flourished in Iraq.

Once upon a time, the arts (of all kinds) were visible all over Iraq.

Once upon a time, Iraqi homosexuals were not condemned to death because of their sexual preferences.

Once upon a time, it was a criminal offense to kill Christians or Palestinians. The term used for any crime of this nature was "murder."

Once upon a time, world experts on archaeology and antiquities were welcome to Iraq in an effort to discover the history of the country and then preserve it.

Once upon a time, veterans of the Iran-Iraq War were highly revered by the Iraqi government and public.

Once upon a time, 55% of the Iraqi work force consisted of females.

Once upon a time, females held important positions in the government, business and the fields of engineering and science.

Once upon a time, foreign workers were welcome in Iraq. They provided many services in the areas of agriculture and the construction of the Iraqi infrastructure.

Once upon a time, any scholar of Arab history was welcome in Iraq as a guest of the government. They were allowed unlimited access to historical documents so they could enhance the writing of Arab culture and share books and articles with the world.

Once upon a time, Baghdad was called "The Paris of the Middle East."

Once upon a time, Baghdad had many parks and recreational areas that families safely used.

Once upon a time, the citizens of Iraq were called Iraqis, not Shia or Sunni or Turkomen or Kurds or Chaldeans or any other designation.

Once upon a time, Iraq had no depleted uranium that was responsible for the deaths and birth defects of thousands of children.

Once upon a time, Iraq’s drinking water was safe.

Once upon a time, diseases such as hoof-and-mouth disease and malnutrition had been eradicated from Iraq.

Once upon a time, Iraqis did not lock the doors to their houses and left them wide open.

Once upon a time, Baghdad nightlife was vibrant with street performers and the smell of mouth-watering food, not the odor of blood and death.

Once upon a time, Iraqi citizens could safely walk the streets with no thoughts of harm occurring.

Once upon a time, Iraqi children were not obliged to turn to prostitution to earn enough money for their families to buy food.

Once upon a time, a gallon of gasoline cost less than one cent in Iraq and there were no long lines at petrol stations.

Once upon a time, electricity was available 24 hours a day in Iraq.

Once upon a time, Iraqis were not worried about poisoning themselves when they drank water from their taps.

Once upon a time, Iraq led the Arab world in technology.

Once upon a time, Baghdad’s streets were clean, not strewn with garbage and human bodies.

Once upon a time, Iraq had a functioning government that addressed the needs of the citizenry of Iraq.

Once upon a time, Iraq was great.

Once upon a time is the opening phrase of many fairy tales. In the case of Iraq, once upon a time was once true. For today’s young Iraqis, the facts are hidden from them and they may consider them to be fairy tales because their Iraq differs greatly from the one depicted here.

Original Article

And then the snake US (ROG) shadow government greenlit them to invade Kuwait only to declare war on them when they did so. And then the UN implemented sanctions that killed a million Iraqis in artificial poverty '90-'03. And then their sorry asses got DU'd and now they can't give birth to normal children anymore.


(above, an Iraqi DU deformed child. below, a deformed American child whose father had gulf war syndrome (source), which many link to DU exposure)

Now I'm not so naive as to suggest Iraq was some kind of paradise before the gulf wars. Didn't they kill a member of their football team after they lost? Nonetheless, these crimes must be recognised. They were done 'in our name'. There was no reason to invade Iraq, it was an unprovoked invasion after a decade of the UN's genocide, er I mean sanctions, backed up by Murkan air power. Murka, F Yeah!! 'Freedom' is the ONLY WAY. (War is peace freedom is slavery ignorance is strength)

What's Murka? Oh sorry that's the new shortened name of the country that once was America - you know, the land of the free and all that - the name was shortened especially for this drugged out generation so they could still spell it.

Look, you can accuse me of being a racist if you wish, but the fact is more or less everyone on the planet is exploited and harmed by this system. Yes I will defend white people from the madness spouted by the cultural Marxists and by so called 'anti-racists', but that doesn't mean that for instance AIDS isn't a bioweapon to kill off primarily Africans, or that these wars in the Middle East with the long term DU pollution are intended to seriously reduce the population living in these areas. God only knows what Palestine or Fallujah will be like in a few decades, with all the DU that has been fired off. No one knows really. The people there might simply wither away and die, seriously.

Yet the madness of DU is that for instance, the DU Israel has been caught using in Gaza no doubt comes across the border and affects Israelis too. Our troops are being poisoned, and so are innocent Iraqis and Afghans. We are all affected by the system's poisoning, be it chemical, cultural, psychological, whatever.

The AAA Warmongers and Military Pimps

I saw this on TV actually, and was absolutely amazed by the audacity of these people, telling the world what to do. Ex2, Jx1. This is your 'white establishment'.



The worst part is most people will not see this for what it is, not just a discussion, but the dissemination of orders from the City. Look at how they sit atop the nations and talk down to America, talk down to Russia, to Poland, to everyone. Can you see? Divide and rule.

The key point is at 19:00, where the nonanglo member of the panel, somehow overlooking NATO's dirty trick encirclement policy, threatens Russia over its missiles! Now I thought that was enough, enough madness. Yet at 21:40 the London boy chimes in with...well I have to quote him on this...

"But that [NATO withdrawing from Afghanistan] will leave a huge problem for Russia, because the Taliban will then take over, and come up to the Tajik border, and the Tajik border is a thousand kilometres long. And then they will penetrate central Asia, and then they will penetrate Russia, and possibly China as well. So therefore, this will present Russia with a huge security problem."

Now is that a very thinly veiled threat or what?

(We know that MI6/Mossad/CIA and Zbigniew Brzezinski have a good relationship with the Taliban/Mujahadeen, as they used these Islamic militants in 1979 starting the Russian/Afghan war. Zbig is now really proud of this because he is in effect responsible for the war that broke the Soviet Union.)



Russia already suffers due to the opium coming out of Afghanistan. The Taliban were halting opium production 1999-2001, but after the deposing of the Taliban by US/NATO forces, opium growth has skyrocketed. You might be hard pressed to consider it a coincidence, given that a major objective of the ROG US military intervention, again according to Zbig, is to prevent Eurasia from uniting against 'American' (NWO) hegemony.

Of course really this objective benefits the US in no way shape or form, it just gets their troops shot up and their national wealth blasted away, but it does benefit those behind the NWO who control America and are running it into the ground while simultaneously using its military as a baton to beat down other resistant nations, paving the way for their fantasy world state.

The Minstrel Boys Aren't Fighting For Freedom

this time, sadly.



No more war for the Crown. For Opium. For Slavery.

BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!!!


With all the budget cuts I wouldn't be surprised if they got abandoned out there on their own.

For now that prospect seems laughable...right?

Aircraft or austerity?
Artillery or austerity?
Fuel or austerity?

A ride home...or austerity?

Depleted Uranium - Killing the Troops

Dr Doug Rokke aka "Dr. DU" speaks to Alex Jones:
1 / 2 / 3
If you are in the military, or you know someone who is, or better yet is going to be, if nothing else at least get 'em to look into DU before they breathe in tank shell dust and die at 30. I respect people who join and serve in the military, if they do so or did so for the right reasons, but certainly in its present incarnation I would not wish that circumstance on anyone.

The ruling class fear war veterans the most as they tend to be the most alert to the criminal nature of the government, and they know how to fight, which alone makes them a primary threat to a totalitarian state.

It's a bit of a catch 22 from the point of view of the manipulators. They do need soldiers, preferably "dumb stupid animals to use as pawns in foreign policy" (H Kissinger). But at the same time, as soon as the soldiers are done serving, they want them out of the picture ASAP, they don't want Vietnam vets sitting at home cleaning their rifles and making lists of traitors for when the time comes. They want homeless, disabled, addicted, preferably dead vets.

It's a simple thing to realise, but what a profound realisation it is indeed, as all the crap kit (at least for British troops), crap medical care, it all makes sense that way, doesn't it?

DU isn't just aimed at our (Western) troops though. Spare a thought for the people in Kosovo and Serbia and Palestine and Israel and Iraq and Afghan who are going to give birth to a baby with its face inside out.

Watch yourselves out there gentlemen. I can see the knife in your back.

Resources:
Uranium blamed for Gulf War Syndrome (well it's either that or the GW vaccines or both)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/270800.stm

Leukemia outbreak among troops (in Bosnia/Kosovo) causes turmoil in NATO
http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/du_eur.htm

Depleted Uranium, just the tip of the iceberg in Serbia
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0131-05.htm

Toxic munitions cause of baby deaths and deformities in Fallujah
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16442

September 11th...1941

Charles Lindbergh speech against American involvement in WW2. Despite his flaws in some regards (I presume he was AAA affiliated?), at least he tried to stop the war.



Oh yeah, and Pearl Harbor...well...we know the US government was breaking all Japanese codes from well before PH happened, and we know that oddly all US aircraft carriers were out at sea just leaving the useless old battleships to be destroyed, and due to PH US public opinion swayed away from the America Firsters (Noninterventionists) and towards Throne of David Firsters (Interventionists), ah isn't history wonderful? A little repetitive sometimes.

Well Why Do You Think We're In Afghanistan?

"Military police are investigating claims that British soldiers have been involved in heroin trafficking in Afghanistan. The Ministry of Defence said it was aware of "unsubstantiated" claims that troops were buying the drug from dealers and shipping it out of the country in military aircraft. An inquiry is focusing on British and Canadian personnel at airports in Camp Bastion and Kandahar. Security has been tightened, with additional sniffer dogs being used. Afghanistan is the source of 90% of the world's opium. Some drug bosses in the country have implicated soldiers in the trade.

Last year the Sunday Times spoke to one dealer who said members of the military were the second largest buyers of heroin after foreign drug lords. The newspaper was told: "The soldiers whose term of duty is about to finish, they give an order to our boss." A team of detectives from the Ministry of Defence's special investigations branch is believed to be heading the investigation into the claims."

- Troops heroin trafficking claim investigated by MoD

Opium output in Afghanistan. Western forces invaded in late 2001, on the basis that the Saudi hijackers on 9/11, many of whom had survived flying a passenger jet into a skyscraper, may be hiding in Afghanistan. Or that CIA agent, I mean radical Saudi Islamist Osama bin Laden was hiding there, perhaps with his family who are best friends with George... oh wait. Never mind, now it's about fighting for, er, womens' rights. Yeah, that one. That's why the drones are there, they take out those damn wife beaters. Die patriarchs! Afghanistan is liquidat- er, liberated.

Anyone who thinks this is just some rogue group of soldiers is missing the point about the drug trade, the drug war, why certain drugs are illegal and who benefits from that. C'mon now, put it all together...

'War On Drugs' In Afghanistan?

BBC Correspondent Says Mossad Did 9/11

First, it's my personal duty to remind you that Israel may be Rothschild's land, but Rothschild is London's man.



Alan Hart is a longtime crusader against Zionism, at least you would think, but if you dig a little you see that he has that Venus Project type Marxist mindset and thus, even if he is very sincere in his motives, is ultimately (imo) doing as much for the NWO as against it. He even quotes that nice chap Dewey.

Demonic Tony Blair Unrepentant, Pushes Iran War

He's still barking at the moon.

Tired of killing Arabs are we? Rather kill a few Persians instead, huh?

He cries in pain as he strikes you. Oh it's so hard for him, he's really sorry. Now drop the white phos on those sand niggers.

It has been quite a 'journey' watching his transformation from humble CP type actor to arch satanist over the last fifteen years. Indeed, he looks more and more like a daemon every day, don't you think? Maybe it's all those Mayan rituals, I don't know. Just like QE2, the evil eyes...aaaaahhhhhh...

Just think how Call Me Dave will end up if it all kicks off with him 'in charge'. Or rather, don't.

Zbigniew's Taliban Snipers

Really this is an addendum to yesterday's post.

Daily Mail: Taliban hire sniper to hit troops at 600yds: British soldier shot dead through 9in gap in glass shield

TPTB don't look on war like we tend to, as a hellish struggle between opposing forces.

Clue 1 - Clue 2 - Clue 3 is the Zbig video from yesterday.

It's hard to really grasp their mindset, but the monuments they build to the dead provide a clue. We have Christmas trees, wedding dresses, Easter eggs, Halloween pumpkins...but all they ever have are Bonfires.

To them, it's not winning a war that counts, it's the taking part (or the taking apart).

What's that expression about realising it's Thanksgiving and you are the turkey.

Something like that.

RIP young Sapper.

A Game Where You Play As The Taliban...So What?

Oh no, not the Taliban...they're the bad guys!!! (wink wink, pot-kettle-black etc)

Yeah, those evil nasty peasants who have been fighting for the CIA, erm I mean for Islam, for thirty years.

Oh yes, they're bad. For instance, they were cutting off the opium trade, which was one of the reasons our criminal drug dealing overlords just had to get in there and reopen it.

"War on Drugs" in Afghanistan?

Yes they are bad. They do bad stuff. But they are not engaged in racketeering, warmongering and exploitation on a global basis, are they?

Zbig didn't get the message. Hey, Zbig, what are you doing fraternising with the enemy? Zbig knows what you don't, which is that having a sock puppet external enemy (i.e. a "Eurasia") keeps the general population from ousting the real, internal enemy.

For the record, I like videogames that show both sides to things. Heck, in CoD5 online you lined up as a Nazi and as a Commie. Who were the good guys there? Actually, the game's story pushes the NWO lie that the Commies liberated Europe from Nazi tyranny. What crap. It's not that simple now is it. Oh how the Russians and Germans were exploited. The Poles caught in the middle.

Control both sides and you control the outcome.

And here we are, back to the present.

At least the Taliban are fighting to defend their own land, which is more than can be said for us.

What do you think happened to the heroin after it was captured?

Sorry boys and girls, I support you but you're dying for naught but greed and exploitation. Some people may view that as an 'anti-troop' comment, but I'd rather they were told the truth than patronised with more 'support the troops' whitewashing brainwashing. If you really 'support the troops', stop contributing to the pernicious lies that end up getting them killed in deception-based 'freedom spreading' foreign adventures.

How better to end than with this.

A Flag For England? (Not For Royal British Israel)

Flags are important things, you know. The joys, hopes, sufferings and character of a tribe mapped out on a rectangular piece of cloth. A symbol of a common bond you could say.

Until recently if you asked me which flag I regard as being the one representing my nation, I'd have an easy answer - the St George's cross of course.

There's just one problem with that. Have a look at the fair points made about that flag here, then get back to me.

Knights Templar. Masonic checked floor. Usury. The Bad Guys.

Now I don't completely agree with that site's statements about the English people, to me it sounds a little supremacist (and I don't use that word lightly like some pc muppets might) considering the role the English aristocracy has had in exploiting first the English people in feudalism, then the Scottish Welsh and especially the Irish people, then large parts of the world during the First Rothschild "British" Empire (the Second being the less formal but more successful Rothschild "Amerikan" Empire).

So I don't know, I'm somewhere between the assessment of the English made by that site and the assessment made by the ZGR that basically the English are children of Satan, I guess. I am not self hating. My grandfather was an ordinary coal miner but no Bevin Boy, he fought in Italy unwittingly for the evil throne of "David", against German lads also fighting - even less wittingly - for the same evil throne of "David" via a one time visitor to London and big time Crown provocateur called Adolf.

I digress. Point is, is there a flag that represents England without being a symbol of oppression towards the English people (a symbol of Norman-Vatican conquest and subsequent feudal serfdom, and immoral Crusades, and an occult Templarist symbol)?

I'm not a fan of dragon flags or any kind of symbolism like that. Those symbols - the dragon, the lion, the serpent, represent the royal bloodline families as far as eye can tell. The lion is the symbol of Judaism yet is also the symbol of the Royal British Empire, and Christians in Rome were thrown to lions, go figure. The dragon and the serpent just make you think maybe David Icke has a point, but whatever they really represent they are all over the place in royal heraldry, corporate logos etc. Exploitation again.
Besides that, there are no lions and very few serpents (unless Icke is right of course, lol) in England, just grass snakes which aren't exactly dragon-like. What the bloody hell are they doing here? The lions surely belong to Africa, and where is it the Komodo dragon is from - ah yes Indonesia, thank you wikipedia, even though you do obscure and lie about many things.

If we're talking animal symbolism, what about the wolf? Humans identify with dogs and wolves because we actually have a lot in common. Certainly humans in their natural environment (ie not the convenience corporatocracy we live in today) share a lot of behaviour with wolves, and wolves occasionally raise human children as one of their own. Wolves were an indigenous English/British animal, not that I support the nutjob anti-human 'animal rights' idea of reintroducing them into the wild over here like they are in America, of course. The British Bulldog is I suppose a reasonable animal symbol, but it just makes me think of dogfighting (and not the courageous Fighter Command kind).

The flag I currently have on this blog is an unofficial flag for Northern England. Since it malforms the evil cross of St George*, I consider it suitable. The Scandinavian cross represents the Viking connection to the North-East, and say what you want about the Vikings, they weren't that bad at all in my opinion; it was Vikings who made one successful free society - Iceland, which is one of the oft-cited examples of individualist anarchy 'working' by modern anarchists, the other of course being Ireland prior to the Crown takeover and desecration there.

I don't think you need to be a genius to figure out why I never really have been a fan of the Union Jack. Uh, can you say 'royal tyranny' and 'involuntary assimilation of the Scottish, Welsh and Irish people'?

So in short England was feudally enserfed in 1066. In truth, despite many fake revolutions and fake freedoms, we have never turfed the bastards who did it out! And to make matters worse they have now intermarried for centuries with other non-European elites and hence they want their British Israel NWO global feudalism. That's not the only paradigm to view modern events through but it is one that makes a lot of sense out of the senseless.

British Israel..."Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land". There is little to no evidence to support its assertion that Brith-ish people are a lost tribe of Israel, or indeed that Saxons are Isaac's Sons. It seems to be an ideological cover for the fact that the English elite, how should I put this, aren't completely European. Also note that in the chart above Jews, ie ordinary Jews, are only given a passing mention which reflects the reality that they have at times been treated like crap, especially if they remained in Europe and didn't go along with the Zionist gameplan to force-move them all to Palestine. Remind me, who promised Palestine to both Jews and Arabs before WW2? Now that's not going to cause any prob-oh wait...

Okay, maybe flags aren't that important. Some think we should discard them because people fight over them. I think anything that makes people willing to fight would be as much of a blessing as a curse today, but then what do I know. The most important thing is what the fight is for, truly. If I thought this nation was unrecoverable, or even the whole human species was unrecoverable, then what is the point of 'living'. It's all lies and the truth is the ordinary human being is incredibly powerful, hence the constant attempts to suppress and control by any means.

The English people don't need a flag as much as a g't big slice of humble pie (sorry but banning guns does not make us 'more civilised' you morons), perhaps a slap in the face with a wet fish, which will slap them out of their korporate kommie kontrolled stupor and maybe then we'll get round to figuring out what the hell happened and who's doing it all to us and what a bunch of crooks and cowards they are, they are terrified of us simply becoming aware of what has been done. Where's the fire coming from? Who benefits?

*of course, I don't view people who have a different opinion of the St George's cross or indeed the Union Jack, even, in a dim light. It could be that I'm wrong and we should embrace these symbols as ones that once represented our oppression but are now a badge of honour and unity - but either way the real history of the symbols must be known first. Which, quite clearly, is not the case today.

War Is A Ritual, or Don't Bomb My Tax Haven Please

First let us take a look at the largely static trench systems of WW1. Here's a map of where the rabble obediently fought over land not big enough to bury the dead.

Notice anything unusual?

The machine gun/infantry predicament made it inevitable that the stalemate would ensue from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. Except one place where an invisible force field (kidding...or am I?) prevents the trenches from expanding into.

And don't buy their explanation that the Swiss were 'neutral'. Belgium was neutral, but the Germans marched right over them regardless in an attempt to outflank the French. So some are more neutral than others, hmm?

And again in WW2. When our chaps were taken POW, where did they run to? Home? That's a lot more difficult than running to der Schweitz, again neutral, and being flown home from this 'neutral' country!

If you were commanding ze Germans in WW2, and unlike Hitler you actually were trying to win, you surely would annex Switzerland immediately and cancel out its neutral status. It would be easy and it would solve a lot of problems, including the easy escape for POWs.

So what do we make of this situation? Two world human sacrifices, and this little neutral country - despite both times offering a strategic advantage to those who would violate its neutrality - remains unscathed (while others like Belgium and Holland are not so lucky).

Magick? Bank accounts?

Bank accounts.

But whose? Be Eye Ssss

"The BIS is also a frequent target of allegations by conspiracy theorists, many of whom portray it as a front organization through which a wealthy elite controls the world. Some argue that the bank has not helped matters through a culture of secretiveness"

Before any misunderstanding is made, I like Switzerland, especially their neutrality and their militia. But it must be understood that the finance oligarchs have done everything to undermine the neutrality and sovereignty of other nations; they only let places like der Schweitz exist because it suits them. Free trade + bailouts for the banksters, green economy adventure for us. Simple equation.

Did I mention that the Square Mile of London is a tax haven? Yet, it's such a 'good', 'sneaky' tax haven, it somehow does not appear on most lists of tax havens. (Take a look for yourself here)

"London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more "usual suspect” jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute."

Square Mile too secretive, says report

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the slaves
Britons never never never shall make waves
?

On "Supporting the Troops" - Lions led by Etonite Mosquitoes

When public support for a war is floundering, here comes the usual government tactic - shielding themselves with the very young volunteers who they send to war.

Just wondering, rhetorically of course - has the Etonian call me Dave ever been shot at? I mean, I haven't, but then it's not me who assumes the official responsibility of ordering other people into harm's way. Lead by example with your slingshot, King David of British Israel! Can you imagine that?!

Cameron calls on national support for troops
TMN News

Next Saturday is Armed Forces Day, when celebrations will be held around the country with the main event being held in Cardiff. Prime Minister Cameron is calling for the country to show its “social responsibility” and give its thanks.

Fresh from his trip to Afghanistan, the Prime Minister said, “These people know all about duty – they’ve lived it. Now we as a country must do our duty by them. Over the past few years there’s been an increasing appreciation of what our Armed Forces do. But still I believe that we should do more.”

He continued, “But supporting our Armed Forces isn’t just a government responsibility – it’s a social responsibility.”

“In the First World War those at home didn’t just sing, ‘Keep the home fires burning’, they practised it.”

“In the Second World War, the military occupied a huge place in the national consciousness, partly because everyone knew someone in uniform.”

“I believe as a country at war we should see the same appreciation today, with the military front and centre of our national life once again.”

Full Article

Etonites (Parasites) - call me Dave is no.2, and of course mad hatter Boris Johnston is no.8.

See, there are many many problems with this simplistic outlook, and nothing disappoints me more than seeing the physical and mental waste of some of the best people in society while other non-enlisted braindead zombies walk around parroting "support the troops".

"If we don't fight them over there, they'll fight us over here" (who? Afghan tribesmen? Or Al-CIAda?)

"They're bringing freedom" (yeah like Karzai the puppet dictator, the coalition-protected poppy trade, and a million dead in Iraq, free dumb indeed)

"They have to finish their mission now they've been there so long" (do they have a mission, first, and second this exact same person would have said before the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq that no-one could predict how it would turn out so we should all shut up and trust the government. Hypocrites!)

And the best one, my personal favourite, full marks for demogogy, hands up if you recognise this one:

"If we leave now then the Islamists will win" (no words can describe...)

This is a classic PR nonsense. Like all the Israel lobbyists always use the term "Hamas" and never use the term "Palestinians" unless they are saying "Palestinians are oppressed by Hamas" (which they are btw, there's a morsel of truth) or "Palestinians don't exist". As in, "we're conducting military operations against Hamas". Liars.

We have done the same! There are no "Iraqis" or "Afghans", well there are but those are the slavish civilians who submit to their colonial occupiers. All those who resist US-British-Israel occupation are of course terrorists, insurgents, Islamists, radicals - no not Iraqi Army veterans with families taking up arms because their country has been bombed, starved and invaded over a decade and a half by UN sanctions, US air power and then coalition tanks, oh no. After all that he picks up a rifle and dares to shoot at his oppressors? Terrorist! Why is he so full of hatred for our free dumb, hmm?

(a thousand words come to mind?)

This is the problem with simply 'supporting the troops' when the orders the troops receive are downright evil. There is nothing that can excuse the sanctions enforced on Iraq which killed half a million children, it is genocide. (although if we believe Madeleine Allbright, it was "worth it"!)

Would I have supported the troops in Nazi Germany or Bolshevik Russia, or what about North Vietnam or North Korea during those artificial UN-caused intra-national wars? Would you?

I would have.

Let me explain.

I have always appreciated and valued the courage and self-sacrifice of the soldier. Yes most are and always have been good people. They're just boys, many younger than myself. You think the average German or Russian in WW2 was concerned by anything more than his own people and his own survival? And his perceived duty to his nation based on the particular line he had received from his national media. And so did British and American troops obediently subjugate Iraq. Brave? Yes. Courageous? Yes. Used? YOU BETCHA.

So where does one stand when the orders troops receive are downright evil, but again despite everything, despite the satanic military hierachy, the majority of them are decent people who essentially, unwittingly, are bodyguards for the most evil people on the planet?

Is not the best form of supporting the troops, in this case, telling them how they are being manipulated? Even if the truth hurts (and it bloody does)?

Trust me, the Islamists aren't going to 'win' (they can't win, just like Hitler could never win no matter how hard he didn't try), because they are a contrived enemy, a bogeyman created to control the masses and reach a predetermined outcome.

If you want to defeat Islamic terrorism, shut down MI6, CIA, the ISI and Mossad. Who knows, you may just find some odd things about who is producing these 'lone nuts' who are just 'radicalised' and are 'waging war on us'.

If you're concerned about Islamification at home, which compared to bigger things (like the prospect of genuine poverty) I'm not that much really but I understand, then bring the troops home, and use them to stop mosque building. LMAO!

Seriously though. All those single-issue Islam-hating sites, because they are Zionist-war-lobby run or Zionist-war-lobby sympathisers, ignore this truth. How can we criticise the Islamification of Europe, when we are in the process of forcibly subjugating several Muslim countries? At the moment we have no credibility.

I would support the troops 100% if they just stuck a big fat middle finger up at these arsehole Oxbridge Tavistock psychopaths, upped sticks and came home of their own accord. Yes, then we'd see who really supports the troops and who is just a chickenhawk traitor.

KDL (Kosher Defence League) fly Israeli flag and sing "God Save The Queen"

You see, I really try to like the EDL. I am against Islamification too, but c'mon chaps, the Israeli flag? I know it is your way of pissing off the Muzzies, but thanks for telling us who benefits most from your movement.

I'll put it this way: say what you want about them, at least Muzzies stab you in the front.



As I said, it's one thing to point out the incoming mortars. Anyone can do that. But if you don't know there is a mortar crew firing, and who they are and where they are, how can you hope to cease the bombardment?

Can You Visualise 21st Century Conscription?

What would it be like? In the semi-apocalyptic event that would be a third world war, probably at this point a land war in the Middle East between the Zionists and the Arab nations with US-Brit-European and Russo-Chinese support respectively, what on earth would we be thinking to go along with this btw, I mean, could it happen? Let's give war a chance for a moment and speculate.

(I think it would be quite easy to conscript millions of people in any Western nation today. All it would take is a switch in coverage of the brainwashing MSM for a few months)

"From the ages of 18 to 27, every Russian male is subject to callup. Those who cannot avoid the draft spend two years in grim, impersonal institutions that at best are brutal and at worst, fatal." (And believe me I've read One Soldier's War in Chechnya, that is no understatement, they beat people to death in training)

1. Nuclear Weapons.

Has to be the first port of call in this discussion. I cannot see there being a major conflict without both sides having at least one nuclear armed nation. I am pro-nuke and believe the nuclear weapon acts as a deterrent between nations the same way that firearms act as a deterrent protecting individuals from the criminal minded. As evidence for this I cite the abundant lack of actual warfare between nuclear armed nations. (Thankfully!) Without nukes there would already have been a land war, probably in the 50s or early 60s, between Russia and the US, fought across Germany and the rest of Europe.

Yet while nuclear weapons act as a deterrent, the possibility of a nuclear war is always there, if a little cliche, almost humourous, something one is not supposed to take seriously in these modern, 'can't-we-all-just-get-along' times. Well that's exactly the problem from the rulers' point of view - the idea that we can all just get along without mutilating each other on a regular basis, now that is bad for business, especially aethereal business. The interdimensional birds go hungry.

So I envisage some kind of (real or fake) scrapping of nuclear weapons, or event in which both sides destroy each others' nuclear capabilities, for instance it may turn out that anti-ballistic missile technology is far superior to the incoming missiles, or that both sides simply agree not to use nukes at all. Probably for environmental reasons. Can you imagine that? "Greening" warfare? Green = Death, get that straight. And I don't mean military green, not in this case, I mean Gaia Green. Less lead, more dead.

There is definitely something absurd about a death machine being environmentally friendly. Although what exactly I'm not sure. After all, if humans are the problem to the environment, then a few million dead humans can only benefit the ecosystem, right? The more the merrier.

I doubt nuclear warfare would actually occur. Although, who knows, certainly the prospect of staging a nuclear event and blaming it on Iran is veeeery much in the, ahem, pipeline. And if you don't think Mossad has nukes under every major Western city, my question to you is why on earth do all Western governments grovel to and worship them hmm? Might want to consider moving a little away from London, NY or any other would be target with that scenario in mind, and stay the hell away from events that may be targeted by nuclear terrorism - #1 on my personal list is the Zion Olympics in London. I have a feeling HM will be somewhere else during that event. I may be wrong of course but I will not risk being vapourised to prove it.

2. Would They? Conscription for a Third World War.

Okay so let's suppose there is a war declared by the financial oligarchs (and of course it won't be fought by them), between Israel-US-UK-Europe and Iran-Syria-Russia-possibly China. Not as one sided as you might think, oh no.

In order for any Western nation to fight a major war, due to the small scale of their volunteer military forces, they would be obliged to conscript people in some capacity. Remember that I am not talking about a likely scenario here, but it is a distinct possibility if we follow previous patterns of economic pillage followed by world war to drown the evidence in blood.

First I ask you this - instead of thinking how ludicrous it would be for our nation and others to be involved in a major war this decade, which you might well do so, consider the position the banking families are in. Their almost-100-year age of debt based fiat currencies has finally brought the world's richest nations to the brink of collapse. The game is up. The internet is exposing them. What did Hitler do in 1944 when his little game of toy soldiers was clearly coming to an end? He attacked with what he had left, and heck it almost paid off did it not?

These rats, when backed into a corner, will do anything before they bite the cyanide in their bunkers. Yes you and I may be afraid of what lies in the future, but believe me they are more scared of us, by orders of magnitude, than we are of them. Their game is death and misery and control. Without control they are without purpose. The psychopath is enslaved by this game - the game of controlling others. And so, behind the facade of invincibility, we find scared little children afraid of anything they don't control.

And you're telling me they wouldn't start a world war to hold onto their power???

Conscription is a laughable prospect in the modern era, rightfully so. Look at the obesity and unfitness of the people. It is a joke, right? Can you imagine your neighbours, all of them of fighting age, carrying rucksacks and rifles all day? Absurd!

How many would refuse? How many would refuse on conscientious grounds? How many would refuse because they're simply too lazy? I remember what passed for PE at school. LOL! No discipline in this generation. I know it's a cliche but seriously, I can't imagine it. Conscription.

Maybe that's why ObamaChangeCameron want us to all do National Service again. Teach those kids to obey the government's orders. Kill! Kill! No, stop snoozing in front of the TV, we only brainwashed you with that to make you more submissive until we needed you. Now we need you! Kill!

Can you imagine David Cameron or Nick Clegg, we will fight them in the mountains and on the pipelines, the poppy fields and in the streets, oh boy that would be something. Some things don't change though - Churchill was an Illuminist, a NWO Zionist same as Hitler, all part of the big human sacrificing game.

If you don't think conscription is possible, just take a look at the British recruits for the Boer War:
There was also embarrassment at the poor health of the British recruits, with up to 40% being found unfit for military service. Most were suffering from poverty-related illnesses such as rickets. Concern over the health of the recruits coincided with increasing concern for the general state of the poor in Britain.

They'll take you short tall fat skinny living dead you will all be seated or propped upright where necessary to grease the wheels of death. It may take a fighting fit young soldier to carry a full pack and weapon on patrol but any slob can man a UAV right here at home from his or her armchair. I have a feeling that may well be one of the darker future applications of the internet. Heck, flying UAV's is child's play, right? And children don't need to know the ins and outs of what they're doing so let's call it a game, right? But for now that's all future talk.

3. Are We Being Prepared For What's To Come?

My immediate answer to this is a definite Yes.

Just look at all the apocalyptic themed games, movies; anyone who has seen the 28 ____ Later films will recognise they are preparing current and future military/police to view 'infected' citizens as the enemy. One may even suggest that preparation culminated in the swine flu epic failure of 2009. I Am Legend also referenced this theme, and the number of videogames on the subject is ludicrous. The concept really became a pop culture phenomenon; but has it primed the emerging generation for such an event in reality?

I have written many times, criticising the military themed games that are designed to desensitise their audience to the horrors of war. Now science fictional violence is one thing. Semi-realistic military based violence (primarily against Russians and Arabs btw, take note of your future 'enemy') is another. Recruitment to the US Army must be increased by their game America's Army, otherwise they would not continually update it, and keep on providing it for free. I have read what people have said before, about actually signing up for armed services literally based on a video game. Sad but true.

The other angle is the apocalyptic-nuclear war theme in games like Fallout, I guess of course the Terminator films, and the US TV show Jericho (not seen personally but lots of CT types are always citing it).

Now there is always argument whenever pop culture is cited as 'evidence' of the intent of the ruling class. Let me refute some of the common criticisms:

- They don't know what the oligarchs are planning.
No, the people who run the entertainment industry are by contrast closely connected to the oligarchy and their black magick 'religion'; see Vigilant Citizen for excellent exposes on this.

- They're just entertaining you.
Certainly, these storylines can be riveting, but when they seem to predict real life events like 9/11 or the Gulf Oil disaster (or these are remarkable coincidences), closer attention must be paid to the content of current media which may contain warnings of future events.

- They are independent of the government.
No, or not always; often films like Machete, which is designed to ignite ethnic conflict in America, or Black Hawk Down, which was one of several pro-interventionist films (also Tears of the Sun) that conveniently came out before 9/11 to get people ready for war, will have government funding. BHD (I've seen the making of where they admit it, the USgov were the only people they could get UH60s from so they say, and in return they let USgov influence the script and write out the bad stuff like the massacre of Somali elders by gunship as they were discussing how to make peace with the Americans, which is largely greased over in most histories of that period) and Machete definitely have both had government support, ie they are direct government propaganda productions.

4. How Would You React To A Conscription Event?

What military training is designed to do, among other things, is pre-program the recruit with set responses to extreme and difficult situations. This kind of prepatory mindset is not only for soldiers, however. How would you, the citizen, behave in the event of the outbreak of a global conflict?

You'd be surprised how many people would simply enlist if they are told to, I think. If everyone else is doing it, that will be enough. That's not necessarily me criticising people who do enlist in the military; I think them to be courageous, yes, but misguided and exploited also. Now if they were simply defending their country, not their corporate MI bosses' opium fields thousands of miles away, I would have a very diferent answer.

But the truth is that 'war', ie the mass consumption of human life, has never been required and never will be; on the contrary, war is to the rulers of the world the highest purpose, not a means to an end (ie freedom/safety etc, the way the pro-war proles see it) but the highest end in itself.

Without this realisation I am not surprised if you laugh at the prospect of a large scale land war with some form of conscription in our time. But take it or leave it, don't say people haven't told you before it begins. The very thing which is often (sadly) called 'paranoia' today, is what may prevent future atrocities. Look at how THEY got their arses handed to them over swine flu, say what you will that was a major victory IMO. World war is the standard last resort and, in this era of unfolding chaos, all the cards are going to be in play. We must prevent further wars as things collapse, so the criminals responsible can be identified and prosecuted.

And then following the collapse, there shall be a NWO. But whose?...

The Shape of Things to Come

German Hating Football Thugs Should Be Ashamed of Themselves

Some English fans harass a lone German after yesterday's game, and others actually burn the German flag. Pathetic.

Imagine if they had an idea of the treason being perpetrated out of the Pirate Ship that is the square mile incorporated, or the other Talmudic Pirate Ship that wants us to fight Iran for them. Rather than getting angry at Germans who frankly, when all is said and done, were far more victims of the horrors of the 20th century, than perpetrators.

If you really want to vent at the architects of the "Great" Human Sacrifice and the Second World Human Sacrifice, look a little closer.



And did those feet in ancient time.
Walk upon Englands mountains green:
And was the holy Lamb of God,
On Englands pleasant pastures seen!

And did the Countenance Divine,
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here,
Among these dark Satanic Mills?

Bring me my Bow of burning gold;
Bring me my Arrows of desire:
Bring me my Spear: O clouds unfold!
Bring me my Chariot of fire!

I will not cease from Mental Fight,
Nor shall my Sword sleep in my hand:
Till we have built Jerusalem,
In Englands green & pleasant Land.

Those cricket fans have no idea what they're singing do they...

Back then the Tommies weren't so stupid. The truth is a nasty bitch that can bite and bite hard and sometimes you might not like it or wish it were different, but you owe it to yourself to face it with a tenth of the courage with which those men faced MG42 fire from their cousins.

Freedom for all. No more wars. No more hatred. No more manipulations.

Israeli Army Targeting Foreign Recruits, Western Israel-Firsters

Because there's a war coming. Also I thought this quote really sums up their mindset:

Like his fellow recruits, Kroll always felt a deep attachment to Israel, given his Jewish roots. He barely thought twice about the perils of serving for another country thousands of miles from home.

Ultimately, he said that he felt his attachment was stronger to Israel than to the United States.

"I'm an American, but at the same time, I'm also a Jew," he said. "So if I'm going to take a bullet for somebody, when you get down to it, I'm going to take it for a place I'm more connected to."

Full Article

This is the problem, you see, with having so many Israel-firsters in positions of power here in the West. Because, well, they will do exactly what the name implies - put Israel first, ahead of their filthy inferior goyim subjects.

Armada of US and Israeli Warships Head For Iran

More than twelve U.S. and Israeli warships, including an aircraft carrier, passed through the Suez Canal on Friday and are headed for the Red Sea. “According to eyewitnesses, the U.S. battleships were the largest to have crossed the Canal in many years,” reported the London-based newspaper al-Quds al-Arabi on Saturday.

Full Article