Keeping It In The Family

The incestuous AAA has a ROG stranglehold over America. Every US president pretty much has been some relative of the Royals.

Obama and Palin are related

You lefty types and non-whites thought you were ending 'white hegemony' by electing Barry, didn't you? Oh no, no siree, the 'white hegemony' is actually AAA hegemony, of which Barry is a matrilineal blood member. Non AAA white people are absolutely not a part of this hegemony, that is the deception, which then pits white and non-white serfs against one another with certain A/A agents provocateurs, in between their visits to the plastic surgeon, frankly, shit stirring and trouble making. It's what you're good at, I will give credit where it's due. You had me for a minute, DDD of the AAA.

Global domination over everyoooooone
Genocide for anyone who isn't AAA
(Wonder Showzen is legendary. Thank you, slaves!)

So what are we to make of this? Why are all our nice overlords related to each other? Why were they specially selected? By who and for what?

Whatever the objective, you have to admit the latest generation of them are doing a piss poor job. The internet is leaving them very very exposed, if people have the wherewithal to see. Now that is another question.

Be extra cautious to put faith in anything said by an AAA affiliate, eg Ayn Rand who was literally in bed with some of these people (edit - find on this page - rothschild - next etc) even if they do not appear to be affiliated, which I do emphasise is a choice. Some people are born into the AAA and rebel, others are born non-AAA but become shabbat goy by choice, which is the worst choice a person can make. At least for the people born into intergenerational Illuminati families, I have some pity.

A Flag For England? (Not For Royal British Israel)

Flags are important things, you know. The joys, hopes, sufferings and character of a tribe mapped out on a rectangular piece of cloth. A symbol of a common bond you could say.

Until recently if you asked me which flag I regard as being the one representing my nation, I'd have an easy answer - the St George's cross of course.

There's just one problem with that. Have a look at the fair points made about that flag here, then get back to me.

Knights Templar. Masonic checked floor. Usury. The Bad Guys.

Now I don't completely agree with that site's statements about the English people, to me it sounds a little supremacist (and I don't use that word lightly like some pc muppets might) considering the role the English aristocracy has had in exploiting first the English people in feudalism, then the Scottish Welsh and especially the Irish people, then large parts of the world during the First Rothschild "British" Empire (the Second being the less formal but more successful Rothschild "Amerikan" Empire).

So I don't know, I'm somewhere between the assessment of the English made by that site and the assessment made by the ZGR that basically the English are children of Satan, I guess. I am not self hating. My grandfather was an ordinary coal miner but no Bevin Boy, he fought in Italy unwittingly for the evil throne of "David", against German lads also fighting - even less wittingly - for the same evil throne of "David" via a one time visitor to London and big time Crown provocateur called Adolf.

I digress. Point is, is there a flag that represents England without being a symbol of oppression towards the English people (a symbol of Norman-Vatican conquest and subsequent feudal serfdom, and immoral Crusades, and an occult Templarist symbol)?

I'm not a fan of dragon flags or any kind of symbolism like that. Those symbols - the dragon, the lion, the serpent, represent the royal bloodline families as far as eye can tell. The lion is the symbol of Judaism yet is also the symbol of the Royal British Empire, and Christians in Rome were thrown to lions, go figure. The dragon and the serpent just make you think maybe David Icke has a point, but whatever they really represent they are all over the place in royal heraldry, corporate logos etc. Exploitation again.
Besides that, there are no lions and very few serpents (unless Icke is right of course, lol) in England, just grass snakes which aren't exactly dragon-like. What the bloody hell are they doing here? The lions surely belong to Africa, and where is it the Komodo dragon is from - ah yes Indonesia, thank you wikipedia, even though you do obscure and lie about many things.

If we're talking animal symbolism, what about the wolf? Humans identify with dogs and wolves because we actually have a lot in common. Certainly humans in their natural environment (ie not the convenience corporatocracy we live in today) share a lot of behaviour with wolves, and wolves occasionally raise human children as one of their own. Wolves were an indigenous English/British animal, not that I support the nutjob anti-human 'animal rights' idea of reintroducing them into the wild over here like they are in America, of course. The British Bulldog is I suppose a reasonable animal symbol, but it just makes me think of dogfighting (and not the courageous Fighter Command kind).

The flag I currently have on this blog is an unofficial flag for Northern England. Since it malforms the evil cross of St George*, I consider it suitable. The Scandinavian cross represents the Viking connection to the North-East, and say what you want about the Vikings, they weren't that bad at all in my opinion; it was Vikings who made one successful free society - Iceland, which is one of the oft-cited examples of individualist anarchy 'working' by modern anarchists, the other of course being Ireland prior to the Crown takeover and desecration there.

I don't think you need to be a genius to figure out why I never really have been a fan of the Union Jack. Uh, can you say 'royal tyranny' and 'involuntary assimilation of the Scottish, Welsh and Irish people'?

So in short England was feudally enserfed in 1066. In truth, despite many fake revolutions and fake freedoms, we have never turfed the bastards who did it out! And to make matters worse they have now intermarried for centuries with other non-European elites and hence they want their British Israel NWO global feudalism. That's not the only paradigm to view modern events through but it is one that makes a lot of sense out of the senseless.

British Israel..."Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land". There is little to no evidence to support its assertion that Brith-ish people are a lost tribe of Israel, or indeed that Saxons are Isaac's Sons. It seems to be an ideological cover for the fact that the English elite, how should I put this, aren't completely European. Also note that in the chart above Jews, ie ordinary Jews, are only given a passing mention which reflects the reality that they have at times been treated like crap, especially if they remained in Europe and didn't go along with the Zionist gameplan to force-move them all to Palestine. Remind me, who promised Palestine to both Jews and Arabs before WW2? Now that's not going to cause any prob-oh wait...

Okay, maybe flags aren't that important. Some think we should discard them because people fight over them. I think anything that makes people willing to fight would be as much of a blessing as a curse today, but then what do I know. The most important thing is what the fight is for, truly. If I thought this nation was unrecoverable, or even the whole human species was unrecoverable, then what is the point of 'living'. It's all lies and the truth is the ordinary human being is incredibly powerful, hence the constant attempts to suppress and control by any means.

The English people don't need a flag as much as a g't big slice of humble pie (sorry but banning guns does not make us 'more civilised' you morons), perhaps a slap in the face with a wet fish, which will slap them out of their korporate kommie kontrolled stupor and maybe then we'll get round to figuring out what the hell happened and who's doing it all to us and what a bunch of crooks and cowards they are, they are terrified of us simply becoming aware of what has been done. Where's the fire coming from? Who benefits?

*of course, I don't view people who have a different opinion of the St George's cross or indeed the Union Jack, even, in a dim light. It could be that I'm wrong and we should embrace these symbols as ones that once represented our oppression but are now a badge of honour and unity - but either way the real history of the symbols must be known first. Which, quite clearly, is not the case today.

The Holy Roman British Empire Never Ended

Don't you know...

“Queen Elizabeth II the largest landowner on Earth.”
Who Owns The World

Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.

She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.

The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx).

This makes her the richest individual on earth. However, there is no way easily to value her real estate. There is no current market in the land of entire countries. At a rough estimate of $5,000 an acre, and based on the sale of Alaska to the USA by the Tsar, and of Louisiana to the USA by France, the Queen’s land holding is worth a notional $33,000,000,000,000 (Thirty three trillion dollars or about £17,600,000,000,000). Her holding is based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in all the countries she owns. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with 114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.

Full Article

So let's see, Elizardbeth owns 6,600 million acres which is about a 6th of the earth's land surface.

And this is worth an incredibly Masonic 33 trillion dollars.

(You see what you want to see)

Atlantis: Real or Imagined?

The story of Atlantis is not limited to one culture or people; in fact, it is found among ancient cultures on both sides of the Atlantic ocean.

Now, how can that be? Let's run down a list of comparative mythical figures, names and concepts so you can make your own mind up...

- Plato's Atlantis (widely considered legend/fiction, perhaps could be analogous, or who knows could actually be historical...) text here

- Atlas, a Greek mythological figure who is a son of the sea (read between the first line)

- Arcadia, the part-geographical, part-utopian place referred to in ancient Greek culture

- Greek mythology relates the idea of a Golden Age; this could be considered analogous to the Biblical concept of the Garden of Eden, and ideas of a Ante-Diluvean state of existence, from which mankind 'fell', symbolically, to its current state. I would suggest that these stories are anything but the literal Word of God, and that they represent mysteries, but that's just me of course.

- Greek stories of Hesperides, again very interesting consistent symbolism

- Irish legend describes Tír na nÓg in similar themes to the idea of Atlantis, Golden Age etc. An island far to the west, beyond the edges of the map, the Land of Youth, where sickness and death do not exist.

- Welsh mythology speaks of Avalon; since this is more recent (12thC), one may suggest it could have come from Plato's work. Interestingly this word (see link) seems to have derived from one meaning 'apple', which is the fruit (although not actually present in the Bible) said to have been eaten by Eve in the popular concept of the Eden story.

(Up to now, things all seem reasonable and can be explained away as nice stories shared by travellers across Europe. Here's where things get weird. Let's cross the Atlantic and see what others have to say...)

- Atzlan, the "legendary ancestral home of the Nahua peoples" (Aztecs). Wikipedia says that, "In the mid-19th century, fringe theorist Ignatius L. Donnelly, in his book Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, sought to establish a connection between Aztlán and the fabled "lost continent" of Atlantis of Greek mythology; Donnelly's views, however, have never been recognised as credible by mainstream scholarship." (Of course they haven't, the similarities are too obvious, and the implications too great, for most of the letters-after-my-name club.)

- Atlaua is the Aztec water god.

- Atlantida is an ancient city in the Amazon river basin, said to have been built by Phonecian explorers. Now let's stop here - 4000 years ago, explorers from modern day Israel/Lebanon actually sailed to South America, according to conventional history! (and you believe Columbus 'discovered' the Americas)

CLEARLY THIS IS ALL BOLLOCKS.

I ask you not to notice the linguistical similarities and mythological similarities between these totally seperate cultures. I ask you not to question whether or not their similarity might indicate a common source. Clearly what we have been told about our history is 100% accurate. Nobody traversed the Atlantic before Columbus, for example, everyone knows that.

I am not interested to see what Ignatius L. Donnelly has to say about this; I will not be reading Atlantis: The Antediluvean World in due course...

If you want my opinion, I think Atlantis/Eden/"Paradise Lost" may well be partly physical, but also psychological...an imagination of a distant memory. Perhaps referring to a real time here on Earth, or perhaps not. Say, if reincarnation turns out to be real, and I by no means say one way or the other, this could be a faint memory of life between existences here, insane as that may sound. Perhaps it is a memory not of this world. What about if it is a trace leftover of alleged human genetic engineering? We also do genetic engineering...like father, like son, right? Who knows.

Incase you haven't noticed, I am on a quest to prove or disprove the saying that if you open your mind too much, your brain will fall out. ;)

For more info on this topic see here

Alexander McQueen: Reptillians on the Runway

Now, why would I take an interest in the last works of fashion designer Alexander McQueen, who of course committed suicide a few months ago? Well, his Spring/Summer 2010 range is called 'Plato's Atlantis', and clearly Mr McQueen was well aware of the stories of the Annunaki.

Reptillians on the Runway by Farah Yurdozu

I honestly cannot see women actually wanting to dress like this. You have to see for yourself, really. But while you do, keep in mind the following pictures...

A Sumerian 'Annunaki' (or 'the gods', literally 'those who from heaven to earth came') figure

See more here: Nephilim Skulls
Above: One of many unusual skulls said to indicate the presence of unusual/non-human intelligent life (oh if only mainstream science would analyse them properly, but they apparently believe all the odd skulls are made up, so we are stuck with mostly speculation...)

A 'Faun', a Roman mythological creature, half man half goat

NOW see his 'fashion' designs in a whole new light...

So was he trying to tell you something? Maybe. If he was entirely responsible for the design then yes. The entertainment/fashion industry is one big black magick ritual heaving with occult symbolism.

Suspicious death? Maybe, but I don't think it's as suspicious as the last film featuring Heath Ledger...

Mysterious snake appears in Queen Elizabeth I painting

A late 16th century portrait of Queen Elizabeth I has revealed over time and degradation that she was originally depicted holding a coiled serpent in her hand instead of the innocuous nosegay she holds now.

The painting today (left) and an artist’s impression of how the snake may have originally looked.

Full story

Hissssssss
or
Genesisssssssss