Vaccination "a superstition" - Dr Hadwen (1923)

The original vaccine, using cowpox in an attempt to cause immunity to smallpox, is somewhat glorified and glossed over today. So did it really work? True, smallpox is virtually nonexistent today...but is it vaccines, or hygeine and nutrition, that caused this?



"The Fraud of Vaccination" by Dr Hadwen, 1923

Note: This doctor was subsequently charged with manslaughter for refusing to use vaccines on someone who ended up dying (as if vaccines would have helped). I have no idea what Wikipedia is saying about Hadwen's rejection of the germ theory of disease. Maybe Hadwen did, but is that a strawman to suggest that all anti-vaccinationists disagree with the germ theory of disease? Ridiculous.

A charge levelled at people who do not believe vaccines work, is that they are against science in some way. However, the real pseudoscience is advanced by pro-vaccine people, who remind us that if we don't all take our shots, millions will die. How many times have you heard emotivist tactics, which usually go something like this:

"Imagine one in every 20 kids in every classroom in the country who wouldn't be here today if not for vaccines." (please note I pulled that number from thin air, just like the 'experts' who fearmonger with these imaginary statistics as a way of getting people to support vaccination)

You see, you should be grateful for the vaccines as they may have saved your life, and if you badmouth vaccines it's because you don't care about the children!

Keyword: 'may'. Does the data show that vaccines caused the reductions in lethal disease that we saw across the board in the 20th century?

Here's a compelling collection of numbers that suggests otherwise:
Vaccines Did Not Save Us: 2 Centuries of Official Statistics

I don't know what to make of this observer's story from during the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html (This isn't proven but it is one person's perspective and a remarkable one at that. Interpret it however you wish.)

Good sources countering the 'sick care' nature of 'modern' medicine in general:
Natural News
Dr. Mercola
Dr. Tenpenny

Dare ya to read ten or more Natural News articles on anything: vaccines, cancer, drug companies, nutrition etc. You'll start looking differently at some of the 'advice' provided by the profitable cult (which is the only way I can honestly describe it) of 'modern' medicine as I now do.

How many people in DC on 9/12?

Some media report 'tens of thousands'...but the real estimates are in the order of 1-2 million.

This is cynical reporting, trying to play down the scale and severity of the protest. Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

ABC smears protest number

Here's a good post listing different claims by media outlets



Also, what impressed me was the apparent absence of litter afterwards, especially compared to the Obama inauguration.

People don't want pandemic martial law?

Who could have thunk it? I thought they'd all be excitedly lining up at gunpoint (possibly against a wall) to receive their mandated untested vaccine protection.

Even the paid trolls haven't bothered trying to make this one sound reasonable:

http://commonhealth.wbur.org/richard-moore/2009/09/critics-loom-as-state-prepares-for-a-flu-pandemic/

Be sure to read the comments!

Seriously, are people supposed to read that and then say "oh well, I guess if that's what it takes to keep us safe"? Who falls for that? We haven't all had enough TV/fluoride/mercury/state schooling, to be tricked that easily.

Perhaps the mainstream media should have taken heed from Abraham Lincoln:

"If you once forfeit the confidence of your fellow citizens, you can never regain their respect and esteem. It is true that you may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all the time."

O'Reilly and Rivera discredit only themselves [UPDATE]

A lot of hot air, little substance in MSM attack on Charlie Sheen's call for investigation of 9/11



Well, they wanted to talk about Charlie Sheen's personal life, but strangely Fox News hosts Bill O'Reilly and Geraldo Rivera failed to address ANY of the points of his letter to Lord Obama.

No, that's not how the MSM works...they instead say that if you question 9/11 you are insane, drug-addled, or both. It seems Rivera is infatuated with Sheen's less than admirable past, yet doesn't care that the worst ever atrocity on US soil was whitewashed by the 9/11 Commission Report.

Here's Sheen's video message, followed by O'Reilly and Rivera's discussion on Fox News:





The talking heads don't care that Sheen's letter contains 20 valid, documented and legitimate questions about what happened on 9/11. Anything raised contrary to the agenda of the establishment, must be 'crazy'.

This is why the corporate media is discredited, it's why newspaper sales are falling, TV viewing figures are down, because people hate putting up with being lied to. So the people are becoming the media themselves and leaving the demagogue dinosaurs behind.

If you don't think there at shouldn't at least be some transparency and investigation of 9/11, then you better be armed with facts and substance, rather than half-baked ad hominem attacks. If not, then sorry; you're bringing a knife to a gun fight and deserve to be ridiculed, Faux News.

Related: Infowars deals with this issue

Ignatius Piazza: Don't Just Remember 9/11...Uncover It

UPDATE: Here's Sheen's challenge to any and all defenders of the 9/11 'official' story:

Ignatius Piazza: "Don't just remember 9/11...uncover it"

I was going to give 9/11 a rest for a while, but this is important. Piazza is the founder of the Front Sight Firearms Training Institute; this is a high-standard and well known US training centre that is clearly reputable, since apparently military and police go there to train above the usual standard (the site claims).

Piazza was the man behind the generosity of alias 'Millionaire Patriot', who offers free training and a handgun to anyone willing to take it up. He also runs a charitable project for a variety of causes.

Make no mistake, it's major to have someone so well respected among military and law enforcement circles and the US firearms community going public asking people to uncover 9/11. And it takes resolve to do so.

Ignatius Piazza: Don't Just Remember 9/11...Uncover It

I remember discussing the events of 9/11 a few months after it happened with an acquaintance of mine who, at the time, would have been labeled as a “conspiracy theory” nut case.

I was polite while listening to him tell me that 9/11 was an inside job by our own government to dupe the American public into willingly allowing further erosion of our civil liberties in the pursuit of “terrorists” and to rally public sentiment to support an expansion of our military presence in the Middle East through invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

At the time, I thought he was delusional. I could not imagine our own government would do anything so nefarious to the American citizenry.

Well, as more and more scientific evidence continues to pile up, as more experts release their opinions, and as more and more very credible people who were in the buildings when it happened come forward to tell their stories about what they saw and heard before, during, and after the planes struck the Twin Towers, the more it appears that the entire truth of what happened on 9/11 has yet to be told.

Now, a very professional and credible documentary has been produced in Europe. It uncovers facts not previously released in the American mainstream media or mentioned in the “official” government investigation of 9/11.

On this the anniversary of 9/11, we should honor those who died by taking a real, hard look at what happened. Ask yourself what YOU believe is the truth. I’m interested to know what you think.

Here it is…

(you'll have to go to his page to watch, it's a new film called ZERO that I would recommend, I'm watching it as I write this)

Please forward this blog to everyone you know — as I’m sure you will agree that EVERY American needs to see this.

And not just Americans, Mr Piazza, all people. Thank you for your courage.

Social Services: Bride 'not intelligent enough' to marry

Remember a few months ago when there was a story about a woman who social services decided wasn't intelligent enough to keep her child? Here's a whole new level of incremental eugenics:

Mail: 'You're not intelligent enough to marry', bride told
(via Connecting the Dots in the NWO)

Social workers banned a young woman from her own wedding in an extraordinary row over whether she is bright enough to get married.

Kerry Robertson, who has mild learning difficulties, was told her wedding was being halted just 48 hours before she was to walk up the aisle with fiance Mark McDougall.

Miss Robertson, 17, had bought her wedding dress and the couple had booked the church ceremony, bought the rings and organised a reception to be held last Saturday.

But two days before they were due to say their vows in front of 20 guests, social services told the bride-to-be that she would have to cancel the big day because she 'did not understand the implications of getting married'.

Yesterday, Miss Robertson, who is five months pregnant, said the decision was cruel.
She said: 'I am still so upset about everything. I know what marriage is. It is when two folks want to spend the rest of their lives together. I love Mark and I want to get married to him.'

Miss Robertson, of Dunfermline, Fife, has been in the care of her grandmother since she was nine months old after her parents were unable to look after her, with her welfare overseen by social workers at Fife council.

And you know there's no way she's keeping that baby either. I mean, maybe we should just sterilise people who are from 'bad stock' so that we don't have to deal with this problem in the first place...

Eugenics didn't go away, it simply concealed itself better
___________________________________________________________________

From Wikipedia: Boiling Frog

The boiling frog story is a widespread anecdote describing a frog slowly being boiled alive. The premise is that if a frog is placed in boiling water, it will jump out, but if it is placed in cold water that is slowly heated, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death. The story is often used as a metaphor for the inability of people to react to important changes that occur gradually...

The boiling frog story is generally told in a metaphorical context, with the upshot being that people should make themselves aware of gradual change lest they suffer eventual undesirable consequences.

And thus ends my 9/11-a-thon

I'll wrap it up with a quote from Mark Twain:

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot"

I admit I'm a little too late to 9/11 Truth (2008, thank you Loose Change) to be one of the 'scarce' ones. Though 'truthers' are indeed still hated and scorned. But hey, 9/11 Truth is a message of peace and love; as the story goes, an angry mob put Jesus to death because he came with a message of love, and freedom, that they weren't ready to hear.

The point is that 'truthers' have the substance, the facts, the evidence, and probably the majority of thinking people out there. (Just see the comments on this article if you don't believe me, most politically aware people question 9/11)

It's not 'leftwing', certainly not for me at least; neither is it about 'hating America', or whatever other ad hominem attack is cooked up by the real paranoid conspiracy theorists who defend the official story beyond logic and in spite of evidence. It is they who distort via disgusting media hitpieces and smear with vile personal attacks.

Though it didn't work on me so much; the BBC hitpiece was my first exposure to questioning 9/11, and I saw it was so biased that I just had to look into the 'crazy truthers' and their material. Yes, the state-run media's hitpiece was what led me to 9/11 Truth - the exact opposite of its intentions, no doubt, but never mind, that's what happened.

What we still don't know is exactly what happened on 9/11 and who made it happen. Nobody except defenders of the official account make that claim. Hence, the main call of the truther is not "9/11 was an inside job", it is "Investigate 9/11". Ask questions, demand answers. And let the evidence point where it may. And when you do that, it points only one way. Away from the official account.



All of the posts (chronological) in my 2009 9/11-a-thon:

Charlie Sheen: 20 minutes with the President
Charlie Sheen: "Challenge me on the facts"
Homeland Security: Hitler Redux
But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have talked!
Asia Times: Fifty Questions on 9/11
Cognitive Dissonance Meets 9/11 Truth
Charlie Sheen asks for meeting with Obama
8 Years on, 9/11 Families still want answers

RIP the 3000 who perished on 9/11/01. Those responsible or complicit must be exposed, lest the military/political machine fueled by false flag terror operations continue to roll.

8 Years on, 9/11 Families still want answers

They couldn't get answers because the 9/11 Commission Report failed to answer 70% of their questions, and no answers have been forthcoming since. No closure, just uncertainty.

So to say that questioning 9/11 somehow hurts the victims' families is absurd...it's the families leading the questioning! So those who oppose having a new and open investigation are the ones who are hurting the families, if anyone.

Representative of largest 9/11 families group says government complicit in the attack

Jersey Girls

9/11: Press for Truth

And here's part 1 of the 9/11 section of Zeitgeist:

Charlie Sheen asks for meeting with Obama

Charlie Sheen has released a video message addressed to President Obama, demanding on behalf of the 9/11 victims' families that a new, transparent investigation be opened so that the questions they still have can be answered.

Infowars - Charlie Sheen demands Obama re-open 9/11 investigation in video message

Cognitive Dissonance Meets 9/11 Truth

Source: Debunking the Debunkers



(below: quote from Wikipedia: Cognitive Dissonance)
"The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors... Dissonance normally occurs when a person perceives a logical inconsistency among his or her cognitions."