State Eugenics is back, who do we forcibly sterilise first?

I would have said that the suggestion to sterilise the poor was just a rare exception, but recalling previous opinions of Guardian and Daily Mail readers, I have no doubt that this opinion is widely held among more self righteous members of the herd.

Of course, it would never be you, would it? It's always be them, over there, the rabble, the scum, who would be on the receiving end. Elitist bastards. Marxists might belong to the most murderous non-religious cult in history, but they do have a point about class war.

I know that many ordinary supporters of the cradle to grave state have damn good intentions, but whatever the truth about the morality and pragmatism of this system, heck I'm not sure about that myself, the real eugenicists (whose aim is dumbing people down, not building them up) have benefited tremendously from it. Yet it's funny, all those breeders on benefits, and we still can't acheive replacement fertility?

That is the real eugenics, and all you self righteous presumably middle class types who wouldn't mind sterilising the unworthy peasantry, you are yourselves victims of it. Eat up! Every mouthful you take from your BPA lined plastic containers and cans makes you a little more infertile. Who's laughing now? Well it's certainly not your children 'cause you won't be having any. Not so funny! Malthus finds it Hitlerious though. It's for the Earth, you understand. Hurry up and die so you stop consuming things you don't really need, like oxygen.

Eugenics is the product of people who have lost respect for human life and do not see themselves as being interconnected with the rest of humanity. Soulless creatures. Not atheists, just negative eugenicists.

PS: I don't use the term 'eugenicist' as a pejorative because really everyone is a eugenicist in practice - partner selection is a blatantly eugenic process. So I specify state eugenics, i.e. forcing people to comply with eugenic processes, and I emphasise both conventional negative eugenics (the sterilisation or worse of 'unfit' individuals) and what I describe as 'real eugenics' (the actual aim of most social engineers, which is to REDUCE the health and intellect of a society, not INCREASE it like the naive popular conception of eugenics says), as being the evil eugenics that we rightly consider to be nefarious. Why would tyrants want to kill off the 'weak'? No, they want to kill off anyone who might resist them. That's what the Commies did. That's what the school system's real purpose is.

Tories Pushing to Introduce GM Frankenfood?

How's that whole "voting-Conservative-'cause-they're-the-good-guys" thing turning out, anyway?

Minister: Britain will open the door to Frankenstein food
Daily Mail

Genetically modified crops were last night given enthusiastic backing by the Environment Secretary.

Caroline Spelman shocked colleagues by suggesting that the coalition government will take a more pro-GM stance than its Labour predecessor.

The Tories have traditionally taken a sceptical approach to so- called 'Frankenstein foods', and at present no GM varieties are cultivated commercially in the UK.

Labour ministers shied away from promoting GM foods in recent years over concerns about a public backlash.

But Mrs Spelman insisted last night they could bring 'benefits to food in the marketplace'.

Her intervention drew fierce criticism from anti-GM campaigners, who accused her of getting her facts wrong and highlighted her background as a lobbyist for biotechnology.

Mrs Spelman set up a food and biotechnology lobbying company Spelman, Cormack and Associates with her husband, Mark Spelman, in 1989. Although she resigned as a company director last year, the firm remains in the hands of her husband.

Full Article

You are what you eat. Modified food, modifies you

This is why I quit videogames

Honestly, anyone who tells you they play CoD online and aren't on some level psychologically or physically addicted to it, is a liar.



(funny commentary, mind you!)

I admit though, I'm still hooked on sugar based foods. Well we can't overcome the eugenics weapons all at once now can we...

The Communists Have Got Our Precious Bodily Fluids?

Well, it might not be something to joke about in a few generations...

The infertility timebomb: Are men facing rapid extinction?
by Tamara Sturtz for the Daily Mail

One in five men could suffer from fertility problems. And scientists have warned that it's just going to get worse...
There's a crisis brewing, but it has nothing to do with the economic deficit or the current political uncertainty. Scientists are warning that rising levels of male infertility have become so perilous that it is a serious 'public health issue'. And some go even further.

Professor Niels Skakkebaek, of the University of Copenhagen, describes the issue 'as important as global warming'. Last week, one science writer even suggested, in starkly terrifying terms, that if scientists from Mars were to study the male reproductive system, they would possibly conclude that man was destined for rapid extinction.
And if it continues, this trend could indicate men are on a path to becoming completely infertile within a few generations.

Full Article

Perhaps General Ripper from Dr Strangelove was right?



natural phenomenon/pesticides/depleted uranium/fluoride/vaccines/genetic modification/pollution/electromagnetic pollution/artificial farming methods/...(any more to add?)

Overpopulation is a Myth

Don't know about you but it always annoys me to hear recited the old line about there being "too many people". Especially because, if anything (check the birth rates), the West is dying off.





Too many petty tyrants and tinpot control freaks if you ask me.


source

30 Million Kids Shot Up With Pig Virus

Another victory for global vaccination campaigns! I say, get yours NOW.

Rotarix rotavirus vaccine contaminated, officials say

Federal health authorities recommended Monday that doctors suspend using Rotarix, one of two vaccines licensed in the United States against rotavirus, saying the vaccine is contaminated with material from a pig virus.

"There is no evidence at this time that this material poses a safety risk," Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg told reporters in a conference call.

Rotarix, made by GlaxoSmithKline, was approved by the FDA in 2008. The contaminant material is DNA from porcine circovirus 1, a virus from pigs that is not known to cause disease in humans or animals, Hamburg said.

About 1 million children in the United States and about 30 million worldwide have gotten Rotarix vaccine, she said.

Those damn anti-vaccine conspiracy nuts who know that elitist Bertrand Russell foresaw the use of vaccines as eugenics weapons in "The Impact of Science on Society". [I quote, and take some time to see the full implications of this; "Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable"]

Those paranoid loons who realise that Merck scientists have been interviewed joking about how their vaccine programmes were a probable origin of AIDS.

Ever notice how the people who don't ever get vaccinated are the healthiest? But that isn't 'scientific'; you have to trust the word of some white coated 'expert' over your own experience.

Truly 'sceptical', truly 'scientific' people realise the importance of mass vaccination. Because chemically retarded citizens, are obedient citizens!

Or, as Bertrand Russell himself said, "Most people would rather die than think; in fact, they do so."

Vaccines did not save us - 2 centuries of official statistics

Alex Jones Explains Fluoride

Fact - Water fluoridation began in Nazi concentration camps, because it kept the inmates docile and submissive so they wouldn't try to escape! (Drink up that industrial waste, eh chaps?)



Part 1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Imagine what it would be like if we weren't poisoned from birth...

Fluoridation is most common in the US, though some areas of the UK and Europe do fluoridate (not me, phew for now). There are things you can do if you live in a fluoridated area, just search for stuff like 'fluoride filter' etc. And fluoride is not the only thing in water that can be bad...but it is a gross deception to say it (sodium fluoride) has any medical application, and even if it did help teeth, putting it in the water for that purpose is retarded. Um, hello - toothpaste?

As for me, I stopped using their fluoridated crap about six months ago (again, just search engine 'fluoride free toothpaste', you don't need fluoride for your teeth it's all a pack of lies), and I have felt better since. It's just so insane on the levels we are being poisoned, how on earth do you introduce that idea to people when they think it's ridiculous that 9/11 was an inside job or that the monetary system is merely camouflaged slavery. I don't know.

It's All Happening Too Fast

For me to blog Big Brother's latest moves.

"School Children Complain of Obama Worship During Lessons"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/school-children-complain-of-obama-worship-during-lessons.html

"Taking Photos of Police Officers Could be Considered a Crime"
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=836646

"Plans Target Digital Britain Push"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7857402.stm

"Every aspect of our lives...will be dependent on the services that the digital network provides" - Gordon [never elected] Brown, PM

Yes he did say 'dependent'.

"Chemicals 'may reduce fertility'"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7855323.stm

What the report doesn't say is that the chemicals in food, water and air, are serving population reductive purposes by sterilising us, giving us cancer and other diseases, and that this is no accident.

Eugenics, anyone?

It's here, it's queer, and you'd better get used to it. That's almost the message of this BBC report about how great it is that embryos were screened for 'breast cancer' genes before conception.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7819651.stm

"The parents will have been spared the risk of inflicting this disease on their daughter", said the doctor who carried out the 'treatment'.

WHAT?!? The parents would have INFLICTED breast cancer on their child? No more than when a child is born, its parents have already inflicted inevitable death on it. It's that ridiculous.

Suggesting having 'bad' genes is the fault of the parents is just as disgusting to me as racism, sexism or any other kind of persecution. What gives you, Mr. Scientist, the privilege to start dictating what is and isn't 'right' about people? Or which aspects of people you'd like to 'change'?

Eugenics has arrived in this 'free' country. Doctors and scientists need to realise their job is not to experiment with the population, and control people; it's to conduct ethical research and TREAT people with the individual soverignty they possess that no-one should ever take away.

Just another example of how authority is drunk on power and wants to control us all. Where's our guns, just incase we need to defend ourselves against authoritarianism? Oh right...the authoritarians took them.