13 May 2011

UPDATE: Due to this BS thing where I can do everything with this blog except publish a post, I have moved home to Wordpress: http://ncnblogger.wordpress.com/ (this will remain as an archive and be damn sure I will still read all your wonderful blogs as ever). Those who have linked me please update the link. Thanks all. Looking forward to continued blogging in the future.

2 May

Today's news is that Osama is dead. Well it's sort of 10 year old news, but there you go. Supposedly one of the very mind controlled special forces shot him in the head, although given the notorious nature of the invading forces' willingness to kill someone then play dress up afterwards, who knows it may have been a woman who they drew a beard on with marker pen. Photo looks 'shopped but what do I know. Then again corpses just like your TV dinner keep very well in the freezer...lol...


Anyway I'm off to get kidney dialysis using only sand and donkey piss while being hunted by all the satellites and spy planes that a trillion dollar military budget can buy, for ten years. Ciao

PS does this mean the war on terror is over now and 'we' can come home and dismantle the police state and not have RFID passports and iris scans and creepy wiretaps anymore? (Comptroller says no)

Saturday, 5 March 2011

EUgenicists Tell Us To Be Accepting and Tolerant (of them)

This Here Openly Totalitarian Project

The European Union is moving rapidly towards becoming a totalitarian empire. It is becoming a place where dissidents are to keep their mouths shut, unless they want to suffer the consequences in the form of punishments, fines, imprisonment and exclusion from the community.

In its newest initiative, the European Commission doesn't even bother to conceal its intention. The title of it, which could not have been beaten by any great ideologist of the 20th century is:

Accept Pluralism

One cannot help but notice the imperative form here. This is no invitation to join in. This is no friendly proposal to behave in some particular way. This is a direct order.

It is the purpose of this new Big Brother institute to "explore adequate policy responses" for politicans to act upon. 15 countries are represented in what is called a 'Consortium', 14 EU countries and Turkey, termed an "accession country", a country on the path to membership.

Delightful job creation

It must be delightful for industrious academics from Denmark and other EU countries to consider the carreer opportunities in this. And as a bailiff, a lackey for the European State. As the person wielding the knife towards his primitive fellow citizens, ordering them to love Big Brother.

And you can rest assured that, just as in the George Orwell masterpiece, the powers that be shall not rest or falter, until the last of the Europeans loves Big Brother of all his heart, loves pluralism – in the sense that the European Union defines it.

This is seriously sick.

Translated from Danish by EN

[***long pc hogwash alert***]

Objective & Mission

ACCEPT PLURALISM is about toleration and acceptance of ethnic and religious diversity in contemporary Europe. This new European FP7 project [Socio-Economic Sciences & Humanities] investigates the meanings of tolerance in a variety of contexts with a special focus on ‘what needs to be done’ actually in Europe in order to proceed to more coherent societies, while respecting ethnic, religious and cultural plurality.

In recent times, the integration and accommodation of ethnic and religious minorities and their special needs or claims has been an important concern for the European Union. In some countries challenges relate more to immigrant groups while in others they refer to native minorities. The question that has often been posed, in more or less politically correct terms, is how much cultural diversity can be accommodated within liberal and secular democracies. It is in this context that the ACCEPT PLURALISM project responds to the need to investigate whether European societies have become more or less tolerant during the past 20 years. The project investigates what tolerance means in different countries and under different circumstances. Do we (not) tolerate specific practices or specific minority groups (immigrant or native) or indeed specific individuals.

The divide between liberal tolerance (not interfering with practices or forms of life of a person even if one disapproves of them) and egalitarian tolerance (referring to institutional arrangements and public policies that fight negative stereotyping, promote positive inclusive identities and reorganise the public space in ways that accommodate diversity) lies at the core of ACCEPT PLURALISM research. However, the borderline between what is tolerable and what is not tolerable is not always clear-cut and not everyone agrees on where the borderline lies. Which are the processes through which the lines are drawn here or there? What are the implications of drawing the boundary here or there? Are the political discourses on pluralism relevant to the actual policies and/or to their implementation? What is the difference between (in)tolerant practices, policies and institutions?

ACCEPT PLURALISM reviews critically past empirical research and the scholarly theoretical literature on the topic. It conducts original empirical research in 14 EU member states and one accession country (Turkey) focusing on key events of national and European relevance that thematise different understandings and practices of tolerance and/or acceptance of ethnic and religious diversity.

The purpose of ACCEPT PLURALISM is twofold. We will create an original theoretical and normative framework of different types of (in)tolerance to diversity, and also explore adequate policy responses with a view to providing key messages for policy makers. Adequate policies seek meeting points between the realities and expectations of European and national policy makers, civil society, and minority groups.

HOW ABOUT I DON'T TOLERATE CONTROL FREAKS. Because that's what the 'tolerance' agenda is really about isn't it. Tolerate your new old serfdom. Don't be hateful or 'anti government'; dissent against Communitarianism is bigoted and selfish.

No comments:

Older Posts

Undebunkable Chemtrails Video That The "Debunkers" Ignore...

...and yes, Chemtrails interfere with weather

(but why they are used, no-one fully knows...)

And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?

It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?

Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!

No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)

I'm Already Against The Next War

I'm Already Against The Next War
Stop the propaganda before it's here. If some kind of terror attack happens in the West, Iran probably didn't do it. They have no history of imperialism and would be suicidal to attack the West. Think who benefits. No bombing of Iran.