(I love this picture I found. Regular readers will hopefully understand why. Subconscious? lol)Sites like I Am An Englishman raise this matter and, I have noticed, seem to be keen on blaming the Welsh and Scots for this (they describe Tony Blair as "Scots-Irish", funny he looks like a demonic chosenite to me; he is actually half English and a quarter Irish-hebrew also if you look into it; Blair is only his father's adopted name), as if they are the ones responsible for England's status.
Well, there is an element of truth to their complaints. The grants given to Wales and Scotland are essentially bribes to keep those people favouring Union under the Crown, rather than Independence. And then, whenever someone suggests Scotland or Wales should declare independence, the same arguments come out from the Royalists - "Look at what we give you! Look at how lost you would be without us!"
Which is a total lie.
I mean, just think about it. If you can function now, you would function fine as a free country, if not better. The Crown just wants that Scottish oil. And they never give up their old conquests. Just like their relatives, who still claimed "their land" nearly 2000 years after being kicked out of it.
So that brings me to why there is no English parliament...really. Well let's say that tomorrow an English parliament was created. Guess what would happen? England and Scotland and Wales would probably drift apart and the Crown's evil Union would be done. The English royals would lose Scotland and Wales, and that oil.
So it is the English establishment (aka 'Br1tish Isr@el') that stands to gain the most by suppressing any English parliament. I certainly do not oppose English self rule - but stop passing the blame for why this has not happened onto others; it's childish.
Posts
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment