Supressed Technology and the New Age

Water powered cars - too good to be true? Um, nope, they're real. The question is, who is supressing this technology, and why? Oh, I don't have a cLue who would do that to keep their monopoly going.




http://www.hydrogen-powered-cars.net/

Whether it's nutrition and health, energy or education, it seems the best things are indeed for free (or very cheap). But the people who try to unleash this potential get capped by the ones trying to hold together their corporate-government monopolies based on deception and artificial scarcity. Now that's a universal truth.

Let that pretty box in your room tell you they're trying to find a cure for cancer. Ha! The joke's on you! There are already cures for cancer, just not profitable/patentable ones. Listen to the natural health advocates. Case studies are available. The evidence is there. Same goes for most medical concerns of our time - all a massive con and a joke.

Anyone who actually develops real stuff to help humanity gets suicided (that is, they shoot themselves twice in the head). How many scientists missing or dead? How many inventions classified or buried? The unaware are unaware that they are unaware, so I don't know.

And now for something really New Age, have a listen to Dr Horowitz. You won't like it if you hate New Age stuff.



Maybe there is something, a grain of truth, to the occult faiths after all? You know, instead of just the satanic wackos and weird rituals. White magic = human evolution or development? Consider.

Black magic is as fitting a description as any to describe how six and a half billion of us are herded around by six hundred. Got a better explanation?

Nigel Farage on the Alex Jones show

Haven't seen this yet but I'm posting it anyway because I know it will be good. Down with the EU. UKIP are for real.

Also, notice the annoying trolls on the comments section? Nope, the BNP aren't for real, they're a bunch of ignorant, co-opted, bigoted scum, and Nick Griffin is the British equivalent of Hal Turner, a useful idiot of the globalist establishment, because he makes the LibLabCons look good by comparison. There I said it.



(Edit: Ok I listened to it all, found the clips from the EU parliament to be particularly entertaining, Farage is a legend, good interview)

All Copenhagen's a Stage

There are more than two sides

While I'm of course hoping that any attempt at passing totalitarian deals at Co2penhagen fails disastrously, I am not falling for the very tempting opportunity to cheer as police brutalise climate protestors.

OK so I think they are wrong as hell. Raised on SorosTube deaducational mindfilth, and believing their fellow humans are a cancer that need to be taxed out of existence, lest the polar bears die. Brainwashed.



The scenes of police aggression against these citizens choosing to voice their opinion, however, constitute a slick piece of propaganda. You see, the co2 cause has always pretended to be anti-establishment. Ordinary citizens against the big greedy oil corporations. Yet nothing could be further from the truth.

For instance, take the Rockefeller business dynasty, one of the richest and most powerful families on the planet. They essentially are Exxon, the biggest oil company. (see here)

BUT, did you know the same family empire funds the astroturf co2 lobby group, "350"?

Why would they support the co2 cause if they own an influential stake in Exxon?

The answer isn't pretty, you'll have to understand how our planet is really governed behind the scenes, and what the agenda these oligarchs have really is. And I'm not patronising you. The apparent contradiction above doesn't make any sense unless you know of the Endgame.

It isn't ordinary people against the oil companies. Neither is it the rest of us against a handful of climate protestors.


(The video's claim [see description] that 50,000 people were there is dubious at best. Also, aren't they in the area of London where free speech is 'forbidden' to 'prevent terrorism'?)

These people are hard to hate. They get that passionate about carbon dioxide (which they breathe out whether they think of that or not), imagine how they'd react if they knew their 'cause' was a front for Nazi eugenics and population control by the descendants of the people behind the original Nazis...they'd be ready to give all our government officials and unofficials a Berlusconi nose wouldn't they?

I think human beings and fish can coexist peacefully.

Ah, a classic Bush-ism. But according to the UN, people are dead set on killing all the wildlife and we have to stop them by force!

See these disgusting propaganda posters depicting humans as monsters. Either it's true, and we must kill ourselves immediately to save the wildlife, or it's bs, and the UN are the most dangerous group of anti-humans in existence. Take your pick.

All environmentalists should reject this crap, 'cause if that doesn't happen environmentalism will be entirely destroyed by these Nazis (and I really mean, in some cases literally, Nazis) who have tried to co-opt it.

Remember:
Your duty is to die once you've used up your carbon ration, to save the planet.

Noam Chomsky, you damn pussy

Oh no, Chomsky's for real, honest, he opposes the military state. Except when it really matters. Between him and Howard Zinn, consider the left gate thoroughly kept. Don't worry righties, you've got your talk radio gatekeepers aplenty. Oh wondrous propaganda joy.

In the words of the video description,
Chomsky says leaders would have to be certifiably insane in order to commit 911 as inside job & they are insane & it was an inside job!



Naomi Klein - female Chomsky and 9/11 apologist?

Howard Zinn: I don't care if 9/11 was an inside job

Cults, Ritual Satanism, "Svali" the survivor speaks

Known only as "Svali", a woman claiming to be a former Illuminati cult member shares her experiences and views of the secret society that, frankly, not enough people know about.

Henry Makow article


Svali details the way in which Illuminists rear their children to be killers (it is a satanic cult after all):

Here is how it is done (how it was done to me):
[1] When the child is 2 years old, place them in a metal cage with electrodes attached. Shock the child severely.
[2] Take the child out, and place a kitten in its hands. Tell the child to wring the kitten's neck. The child will cry and refuse.
[3] Put the child into the cage, and shock them until they are dazed and cannot scream any more.
[4] Take the child out, and tell them again to wring the kitten's neck. This time the child will shake all over, cry, but do it, afraid of the torture. The child will then go into the corner and vomit afterwards, while the adult praises them for "doing such a good job".

This is the first step. The animals get bigger over time, as the child gets older. They will be forced to kill an infant at some point, either a set up or VR, or in reality. They will be taught by age 9 to put together a gun, to aim, and fire on target and on command. They will then practice on realistic manikins. They will then practice on animals. They will then practice on "expendables" or in VR. They will be highly praised if they do well, and tortured if they don't comply.

The older the child or teen, the more advanced the training. By age 15, most children will also be forced to do hand to hand combat in front of spectators (high people who come to watch the "games" much as the ancient gladiators performed). These matches are rarely done to the death, usually until one child goes down. They use every type of weapon imaginable, and learn to fight for their lives. If a child loses a fight, they are heavily punished by their trainer, who loses "face". If they win, they are again praised for being "strong' and adept with weapons. By the time they are 21, they are well trained combat/killing machines with command codes to kill and they have been tested over and over to prove that they WILL obey on command. This is how children in the German Illuminati are brought up, I went through it myself.

Discussing orchestrated financial collapse. This was back in 2002 remember:

The Illuminati has planned first for a financial collapse that will make the great depression look like a picnic. This will occur through the manoeuvring of the great banks and financial institutions of the world, through stock manipulation, and interest rate changes. Most people will be indebted to the federal government through bank and credit card debt, etc. The governments will recall all debts immediately, but most people will be unable to pay and will be bankrupted. This will cause generalized financial panic, which will occur simultaneously worldwide, as the Illuminists firmly believe in controlling people through finances.

On public knowledge of the Illuminati:

I really don't believe people will do anything about the Illuminati even if they know. Sorry for the cynicism, but it is based on a lifetime of experience.

The Illuminists don't care who prints this stuff, or if they are "exposed" because they are counting on the majority not believing it, having done a pretty good job with a media blitz campaign (seen any articles in Newsweek or Time lately that addresses this other than as a laughable conspiracy theory? Guess who owns Time-Warner?).

I have heard them laughing about this very thing in leadership meetings five years ago, and I doubt their attitude has changed much since then. If people DID believe this, if action could be taken, then I would be very surprised and quite happy.

More "Svali":
Are the Illuminati taking over the world?

Don't acccept what you read uncritically, never do that. Consider it for yourself. I reckon she's for real though. After all, most people are aware of the existence of cults, thanks to outspoken cult survivors. Just the idea of the most powerful people in the world being amongst a cult, that's harder to swallow perhaps. But if it is true that corrupt people seek power, then should not the most powerful people in the world be the most likely to be affiliated with abusive cults?

This of course presents a huge pile of questions relating to the sanctity of our democratic processes, integrity of government and so on. But if you've been paying attention lately you'll already know that these things are disappearing faster than, oh I don't know, the last pretences of our national sovereignty to the Eurogenics Union.

Their Great Work, like the Great War and the Great Leap Forward, will be Great for BaphomeSonic FasciLuminated CommUciferians only. And I love the delicious occult irony that China is literally the real Eastern Star heralding all this crap. You bloody symbolists.

It's A Climategate Christmas + BBC has 'denier' viewpoints heard

M4GWFTW! My favourite has to be their adaptation of Chestnuts Roasting On An Open Fire. Just genius. Unfortunately this isn't a real album, just an advert... :(



Do I Really Have Something Nice To Say About Pravda UK?

A few days ago I commented that the BBC really allowed little room for meaningful climate debate on their Radio 5 broadcast discussing 'climate change' recently. Although it's a couple of days late, I thought I'd pass a more favourable comment over their Thursday programming (pun intended), during which AGW 'denier' James Delingpole was actually allowed to speak for, I don't know, several seconds.

Unfortunately, the hefty bias as always was there - the interviewer interrupted any attempt by callers to say there is a lack of evidence of manmade climate change happening - with a nice condescending "I think there's plenty of people who would disagree with you about that". Of course no mention of the 31000 strong scientists' petition 'denying' manmade climate change when addressing AGW believers. If it's not cliche to say this, Goebbels would be proud.

Still, it's better that Mr Delingpole and other 'skeptical' laypersons* were allowed to speak, and I think they did a good job presenting a short case against the ludicrous global 'climate deal', i.e. making the Earth's life cycle subject to taxation.

*no scientists or experts of any kind were featured, to my knowledge, during the discussion, either pro or anti manmade global warming theory. Propaganda was instead featured heavily, notably including the ridiculous 'you're with the oil companies' ad hominem.

If you can read this, thank a teacher...

...um...if you're not reading this in Pashtun, thank a soldier?
Perhaps those who say 'support the troops', when they mean 'support the war', could take another look at who is behind the anti-war movement.

Sir! No Sir! Part 4 of 11 - How To End A War



Want to travel the world, killing and dying for bankers? Consider the Army.



I support the troops by advocating that they don't have to make the sacrifices they are ordered to make, because most of the time - despite government propaganda - these sacrifices are entirely unnecessary.



RATM classic. Also isn't this the song people are trying to get to UK Christmas no1 in place of the X Factor winner? Hehe.

"Truth in Advertising"

All I have to say is, LOL!

It's the agenda, the big picture, the 'conspiracy'

I don't claim to understand what goes through the heads of the people in charge of this world. I have however educated myself to an extent about the multi-faceted scams, tricks, deceptions, layers within layers that shroud their actions and their intentions. And make no mistake, I am no authority on this. I am not speaking from authority or casting such an air. I am just a citizen.

They have their own religion, their own way of life that is diametrically opposed to the rest of humanity. This is blatant. Call it 'occult', 'satanism', 'mystery religion', or just 'the love of power', whatever you want. But whatever their motives, they are dead set - just like Robert Mugabe's re-election slogan - on 'total control'.

If you care to imagine what their vision of the future is, look to our past. Feudalism in the Medieval period. Utter degradation that one can barely imagine. Worse even than most of Africa today. Yes, that was a time of total control.

But who in their right mind would yearn for a return to that?

Disgusting, inbred, psychopathic loons are in charge of our society - MAKE NO MISTAKE they are in charge, just take a look at who controls the issuance of debt (slave) currency in your fine nation wherever you live, though I'm not saying you'll find easy answers if you start asking 'who prints money out of nothing and gets to charge the government interest on it?'

Debt mounts up (plus compound interest) then you have to pay it in raised taxes and the inflation tax, the latter of which also means more debt. But it's all a scam.

If you don't believe me, consider this. Most countries around the world are in debt. To who? Not all of it is simply to other countries. If it was, the global average of deficits and surpluses would be zero. But look at all the debt everyone is in! (perhaps except China...for now)

The answer is that we are all in debt to OUR OWN CENTRAL BANKS, which are controlled by a global network of crime families totalling no more than a few hundred people at most. This is the New World Order. It's not China, not the Jews, not the Muslims, nor is it the Whites, it's just a few hundred inbred psychopaths who have grown incredibly good at making the rest of us fight amongst ourselves instead of fighting their control structure.

Call it 'the Illuminati' if you wish. Or don't. It's just their silly stupid name anyway, translating as 'enlightened ones' (inferring that the rest of us, of course, are in the dark). I don't care what you call it, whether you think one word or another is crazy, the name doesn't make it any more or less real.

Now then, goals. Many see parts of the agenda but do not see other parts. I am suggesting the likelihood that some kind of feudalism is the endgame, simply because I believe the elites probably harbour some nostalgia for the original feudalism, as a time when their predecessors did rule completely.

So let's look at the elements of this potential neo-serfdom shall we?
Surveillance Society is that which we live under to some extent now. Databases record untold amounts of information about everyone, and we simply must trust that this information is secure and all above board (trust me, I'm from the government!). Cameras, satellites and other surveillance platforms record our every move. This is designed as in the novel 1984, to give the individual a feeling of helplessness in the face of the 'mighty' (but house of cards) power of the state.
Classical Fascism is absolutely necessary to wipe out organised dissent of any kind. A whole host of things could be considered as potential triggers for classical, boots-in-the-street fascism. The climate of fear surrounding terrorism or a pandemic is one option. Another is so-called 'green fascism' that would see the state stomp out any AGW deniers, and of course any carbon criminals.
Cashless Society would allow the state to literally cancel someone's very life at the touch of a button. This is where RFID chips come in. Many Christians cite RFIDs as being the Biblical 'mark of the beast', and it would certainly be true in a cashless society that no man would be able to buy or sell lest he hath received a working, approved chip.
Eradication of the Family is essential to allow the state to raise all children, and thus control the future. The state is in the act of trying to replace the family through the following schemes: welfare state (if you feed a dog it becomes tame, same principle with humans), state schools (allowing the state to usurp the mother and father as the child's perceived 'parents'). The endgame of this process is to see all children not only raised, but created, by the state (parents would need permits to birth, and would be selected eugenically for that purpose).
Population Control is the mega-endgame tying together these previous arms. The elites seem to have decided that all these people are getting a little hard to control, so the rationale is that thinning the herd out means less chains are required for future slavery.
The Happy Ending is for the elites only. They can walk the Earth, just a few thousand I guess, with a hundred slaves each perhaps, and not have to deal with those pesky rabble whining about freedom and so on. Ironically, considering their obsession with death, the elites do have a will to live unfortunately. They want to extend their lives with technology...the only thing is, they do NOT want these developments to be shared with all of mankind. We the non-enlightened ones are not worthy like they are.

Now, the most important part. They are absolutely failing, collapsing all over the place, in their agendas. Something is going terribly wrong with their little schemes. Too many people know too much about too much, thanks to the internet (take me for example, I had no idea about this stuff even a year ago). It is likely they will never acheive their little Novus Ordo Seclorum long dreamed of. But that doesn't mean they won't kill millions of us trying.

Addendum - Potential Questions:

Is there an 'elite' like that which I speak of? How can I prove this?

Well, when I say 'elite' I am merely using a convenient collective term to refer to the dozens of inbred, interbred families that form a kind of modern monarchy, that has overtaken and indeed destroyed conventional monarchy in the last few centuries. Bankers hold the keys to the Earth. A Rothschild once said, 'give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws'. Big banking/oligarchial names to look out for, and pay attention when you catch these names, include Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Schiff, Warburg, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Really there are many more, and the name 'Rothschild' for example refers to a broad family operating in many countries. Can I prove that 'the elite' exist? We could go on ad infinitum, but the basic answer is that I cannot, it feels too much like equating correlation with causation to say it is proven. Take a look for yourself and decide whether these...'people'...constitute an invisible financial government.

Can I show that Central bank X is privately owned?

Thanks to the groundbreaking anti-Federal Reserve movement in America, people are becoming aware that the Fed is a privately owned bank masquerading as government. Unfortunately, the Bank of England still says it is part of the UK government, claiming to have been 'nationalised' in 1948. In fact, economists say anything else is a 'conspiracy'!

Common sense is proof enough that your central bank, wherever it may be, is privately operated for profit. Question: If government owns a central bank, why do they not just print money for themselves and not charge themselves interest? The only reason a central bank would charge government interest on money borrowed, is if the central bank is a seperate institution to the government, i.e. private. Government would not charge itself interest - the absurdity! - no, central banks including the BoE are another breed altogether. Not quite private, but not quite government either. The worst of both worlds in fact. The economic black hole into which the world is sinking. But it makes the elite very very rich at the expense of everyone else.
________________________________________________________________

Educate yourself about money, and let the other chips fall where they may.

Fiat Empire
Zeitgeist - Part III Men Behind The Curtain

Global Research - Who owns the Federal Reserve?