"Austerity" Scam: European Nations Begin Seizing Private Pension Funds

I don't have a problem with austerity according to the dictionary definition, especially on a personal level.

I also previously described localism as a solution to the globalism in our world today. However, David Cameron's "Localism" is a deceptive way to name what is basically the next phase of the NWO's grinding down of its subjects. "Austerity" is a scam to loot from the people in order to "balance the budget". There will be no real cuts in the military spending (on immoral foreign wars rather than legitimate self defence), and there will be plenty of cash for vaccine schemes and for CCTV systems and other police state projects, the very things that could really do with cutbacks.
_______________________________________________________________

European nations begin seizing private pensions

People’s retirement savings are a convenient source of revenue for governments that don’t want to reduce spending or make privatizations. As most pension schemes in Europe are organised by the state, European ministers of finance have a facilitated access to the savings accumulated there, and it is only logical that they try to get a hold of this money for their own ends. In recent weeks I have noted five such attempts: Three situations concern private personal savings; two others refer to national funds.

Full Article (with the not-so-subtle embedded links to "Europe's most generous pension systems", as if the people deserve to have their pensions, that they paid for, stolen)
________________________________________________________________

A lot of the anti-Austerity people are Commies, I will grant that. I don't agree with them. It's a one-two punch. The fabian socialists get everyone dependent on the system to begin with, and then when Cloward-Piven point approaches, the 'free market' crooks descend like vultures to complete the looting of the wealth of the people, claiming they are undoing the work of the socialists, when in fact from a bankster perspective they are simply finishing what the 'left' started.

(Don't forget that, at least in the UK, citizen contributions to the state pension fund are FORCED. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Insurance. So they force you to pay into a scheme then say that you have to embrace "austerity", and steal it all from you.)

I'm not saying it was a good thing that people went along with any of the aspects of the welfare state - but once on, there is a right way and a wrong way off. This is the wrong way. Maybe there is no other way, as "austerity" adovcates will tell us more and more I'm sure. But if that is the case then we must acknowledge that the government and their banking-corporate crony partners are stealing pensions that ordinary people have faithfully paid into, and that last time I checked, theives are supposed to go to jail.

There is one other way. Shut down the usourious basterds' central banks, issue debt free currency, and cancel the ludicrous, unpayable, fraudulent national debt, most of which is to the central banks anyway. Take the byrden of these currency wizards off our back then see if pension scheme recipients can be paid well enough for their contributions. If the results Hitler acheived by taking Germany off of debt-usury money are any indication, I think we'd be fine. That was the one good thing Hitler did, although it was for the wrong reasons as he wanted to build Germany up to be an Empire. Enough Empires. Enough of them!

(PS Corporate welfare will of course continue unmolested. Keep believing the right wing wants to free you.)

Love/Hate Mail and the Left Right Paradigm

Source

"It's a tragedy that you have 118 followers. [note: it's now 117, "Nocturnal Hermit" aka "The Propagandist" abandoned his blog suddenly (link) after reporting he had received death threats.] That's potentially 118 people being sadly mislead by a person who thinks that using words like "retarded" (no matter their lame attempts to legitimise the use of the word; no one's buying it) are kosher.

More tragic still, is that most of those followers are no doubt concerned by imperialism and globalisation - as you pose as a dissenter of both - yet lead astray with perfunctory and facile lines along the lines of "there's no difference between right and left, only levels of control" (or whatever).

Anyone with the first clue about political science and political economy can see how patently obscene that is. You should be ashamed of yourself for corrupting with such absurdities whilst posing as a sage."

First of all, the left right issue. Look here. One the one side we have Nazi Germany. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide. That is *right wing*. On the other side we have Soviet Russia. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide (a fact that the Communist education system tries to minimise). This is *left wing*. Now am I really all that wrong in saying the left-right paradigm is an instrument of pointless division?

Communism IS globalisation. Communism openly states its goal is a global revolution...it's just not the one you are thinking of. Funny that the forces of imperialism, corporations and the military state, are also looking towards this goal, globalisation. You only oppose one half of globalisation not the other. What's more, any attempt to reassert national sovereignty would likely be condemned by your sort as being Racist or Fascist!

I don't 'know' much of political science or political economy. I don't know what they feed you in your textbooks. All I know is, there's a group of insane supercapitalists who run our government and run the wars and promote Fascism and Communism which are in practice very similar.

I called the students retarded because I pity them. They have indeed been 'held back', retarded, by the deliberately dumbed down education system. Retarded is the precise and correct word for this situation. But those imperialists, those corporatists, who run the wars and the military industrial complex and the banks, they couldn't possibly also run the education system could they? They couldn't possibly bankroll Communism could they? Could the same grand planners be behind murderer Che Guevara and murderer Milton Friedman?

Divide and rule. Works pretty well with these ludicrous nationalist vs antifa pantomimes on the street. Who is talking about the central bankers and their debt slave usury money that runs your life? I am, hell the whole internet is thank gawd, and they are not. (Did I mention the existence of a central bank is enshrined in the Communist Manifesto? Why's that? Not very proletarian...or revolutionary...)

How much time did the education system take to tell you about how all our money is created as a debt that we have to pay compound interest on? I can honestly say, zero, myself.

Brave 'We Are Change' Confront Jon Stewart's Laughing Hyena Liberals

As Ghandi said, they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.



Rather obvious how the right wing and left wing corporate media join forces to attack 9/11 truth. Because that is a real issue, rather than foolishly debating whether to vote for blueblood homosexual coke snorting Crown loyalist Obama, or blueblood British Israel warmongering Crown loyalist Palin. Even Ron Paul is a Freemason, but that's another subject for another time.

About the whole sanity thing...you really think you are a hallmark of sanity, if you get your opinions from Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz?

Re - "Curb Stomping"...

Just thought this was a good time to reflect on who is more inclined to violence. While I do not personally support much of the right wing tea party thing, I dislike the Soros zombies more. Their inclination to violence, their blind fanaticism, their dirty tricks, their hypocrisy. They are the most hateful ones, yet they accuse pretty much everyone else of hatred. In fact that's all they do.





Take away racist sexist homophobe hate-speech privileged green Jeebuz diversity change progress and I'm not sure they'll have much else to say; their dictionary will be empty.

I had to link to this. That's the mentality! Insane!

Frank Dikotter and Alex Jones discuss Mao Worship

And the teeny tiny thing about him being history's biggest mass murderer. Davy Rockefeller's favourite.

Part 1 / 2 / 3
btw interesting fleur de lis shirt Alex. Loyal to the royal huh?

From A China Traveler by David Rockefeller, 1973

See, Che is only for wannabe Commies. Che wasn't half the Commie Mao was. Mao was a real hardcore Liberator Of The Proletariat.

Image source

And of course there is nothing Commie about the education system, just those paranoid idiots and their Communist Conspiracy theories.

Also why is it that so many Commie or left-anarchist type kids, despite often being nice people, are mentally defunct? Don't tell me you haven't noticed. John Dewey you have some explaining to do.

Retarded Communist Students vs BNP in Glasgow

Note that the BNP were there with a banner calling for troops to be brought home, hardly Nazi in any way shape or form now is it.

"BRING OUR TROOPS HOME bnp in glasgow being attacked"

Also note that the real, truly hateful people are the radicalised, brainwashed, Communist students. Retarded means hindered or held back. A fitting description of anyone who has been subjected to over a decade of (re-)edyucashun.
So who's really engaging in persecution, and anti-freedom, fascistic behaviour? Leaflet above shows Communists determined to harass anything vaguely pro-Western and anticommunist, wherever it may be.

It doesn't really matter what you think of the BNP. These demon kids are the real danger, and they absolutely will throw you in a camp if you are 'Nazi Scum', which means if you at all oppose Communism or the Green agenda. They can only repeat what the school system has filled their head with. They, simply, do not understand what is being done to them, and how they are far far more deadly than the imaginary Nazi Scum they think they are fighting.

Communists tearing down an anti-war protest banner just because it isn't a Communist anti-war protest banner. Get your head around that one.

Relevant news #1 - Britain goes Halal (in secret)
Relevant news #2 - Soldiers' memorial to be cut down
Now if that isn't symptomatic of a dying country I don't know what is.

Back when I was in 6F, the BNP came to town one day, and a lovely group called Hope Not Hate actually distributed leaflets to all in my 6F telling them to come and protest the BNP. Yeah, bring in people who know nothing except what the Communist dumbed down school system has taught them, they are the people we really need to listen to.

Hope. In a world where patriots are Nazi Scum, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength, just what is 'hope'? And what is 'hate'?

They just don't get it, but they will. Reality will mug them. Reality is a mean bitch like that. And once they do get it, all that misplaced anger will be redirected at their thought controllers.

Tricky thing, keeping the youth controlled. Can go horribly wrong, they'll go all Edelweiss on you if you force it too much.

I have to at this point mention Vigilant Citizen in a favourable manner; his site has reached one or two young people I know about who first viewed his site months ago due to the music related articles and have since, not necessarily WTFU'd, but are getting there. We need the youth to break their indoctrination, not to be future Commie/Green death squads as they are being trained for.

The Communists' Shifting Definition of 'Hate'

Hate, very simply, is something that no right minded person likes. In fact, we may well hate hate, or if that is too paradoxical, we moderately dislike hate. Most people do not truly hate unless some pretty extreme circumstances make it so.

This poster is racist, I'm complaining to the...er...the...?

Many people do hate, including in the political arena. Although a lot of hatred stems from personal issues, for example someone might hate the Brits if their family has suffered at the hands of the Crown, or one may hate Americans because the CIA has meddled in their country, or one may hate cats because they have just never got along with cats, hatred can also be much more subtle and be brought about by, essentially, brainwashing. Or to use a more polite term, propaganda.

In general hatred is not psychologically beneficial to an individual. It is certainly not helpful to the hated. So in general hatred makes losers all round, although I would certainly not criticise anyone who has justified hatred or anger over a wrong.

But what constitutes hatred? How does society, that is, the majority of society who are to a large extent under the spell of TPTB, define hatred? And most importantly, is this definition consistent?

Hatred is often simply something the Communist doesn't want to hear.

And by using the term 'Communist', I am referring to all those who deceptively call themselves 'progressives', 'global thinkers', and so on, which constitutes the left wing of the establishment - the right wing being the joint (Christian) Zionist and AngloMasonicBritishIsrael war/drug/terror groups. Really they're all stinking Commies whether they even know what they're serving or not. Well really I don't know what they're serving either, but, another story for another day eh...

So the popular (Communist) conception of what hatred is goes something like this. Racists first, then sexists, then homophobes, then xenophobes and nationalists, then if you're a real hardcore Commie, spieciesists.

It's hateful, for instance, to burn a Quran. But, and I'm not a Christian btw (that would be 'hateful', lol), it's OK for that Yiddish American guy to piss on Jesus for his TV show, that is freedom of speech.

It's hateful to ban a burkha but it's OK to ban employees from wearing cross necklaces.

It's hateful (and sexist!) to say that abortion is wrong but it's OK for pro abortion types to tell young girls, hey, if you get pregnant, don't tell your parents, come and see us, we'll get rid of it for you quietly and the government will pay. Yes that is a paraphrase of something the 'health visitor' who taught us PSE basically told to the girls in my class, who were like 14 at the time. Always remembered that because even back then as an unwilling unwitting participant in John Dewey's Commie Circus it seemed very wrong.

It's hateful to say that women are better homemakers, but it's OK for feminists (can't remember which one) to compare women who choose to be housewives with concentration camp inmates. Y'know, the kind of mindset described here.

Here's one that will really get to some people. It's hateful to say that homosexuality is wrong but it's OK for the media to encourage homosexuality at every turn. Well they do, don't they? And they also attack the herterosexual nuclear family at every turn, do they not? Is that hateful? No, it's 'progressive' of course. Silly me.

Okay then. Let's shift directions a little. It's OK for the crazy Muslims to promote Sharia for the UK etc, or it's OK for the crazy Communist La Raza to declare huge swathes of the US to belong to the Mestizo people exclusively, but it's tough to even argue against illegal immigration without having to open every sentence with "I'm not racist but...", because having a view that stands in the way of Communism is 'hateful'.

It's OK to call the BBC "hideously white" (an asinine charge, I hope that doesn't include BBC's Asian only radio network?), but, at risk of sounding cliche, one can imagine how society would react if the situation was inversed, if someone called their Asian network "hideously brown" for instance.

However, who really hates? I don't.

Who is carrying out this agenda of destroying the West from all angles?

While I am hardly a Christian myself - who takes every opportunity to mock and deride Christianity and spit on Christians?

Who has encouraged, nay paid millions of foreigners to come to Western lands, encouraged them to abuse their hosts at every turn, then told the few natives who dare have a problem with this to shut up and stop being so racist and hateful?

Who has made every attempt to undermine the backbone of a healthy society, the family and related values?

Who promotes Malthusian ideology that humans are a pox on the Earth and need to be reduced or completely wiped out?

Who has distorted the definition of 'hate' to make it seem like they are not the hateful ones, and everyone else is?

Who is making trouble where there need not be any?

COMMIES.







Who are the Commies?

Two Green Movements

Or, if you prefer, two strands within the green movement.

One is the movement of self sufficiency and independence. Of "getting off the grid" and "food security", "anti-corporatism" and "low impact living". A big threat to the centralised, interdependent control grid.

The other is of course the CO2penhagen Commies, or Watermelons if you prefer.

So has the latter sabotaged the former?

I almost feel like the Carbon Commies backed down a little too easily after Copenhagen/Climategate. This Lord Monckton shows up, oh I don't doubt his sincerity but remember all the world's a stage, and within literally a few months, the whole game has changed and the CO2phobes are running away with their tales between their legs and wads of cash stuffed inside their Fair Trade sandals.

Warum?

That's not like the usually audacious NWO to run like that. Now the old media is having to admit, well, we were shitting you all this time about boiling oceans, drowning polar bears et al. Not so blatantly but you get what I'm saying, they're backing off.

Is/was the green movement becoming a threat?

That's the beauty of these movements. Like the Tea Party. You try and control them, place your people at the helm, weed out the "extremist lunatic conspiracy theorists" (ie real deal anti NWO people), but they defragment and reform somewhere else; it must be like playing occultist whac-a-mole.

The genuine environmental movement should be, and frankly for the most part among ordinary people is, pro independence and self sovereignty, and utterly non Commie. Maybe, just maybe, they have been Tango'd.

And it takes two to tango.

"Death Panels" Were Inevitable, Not A Fiction

One thing that always annoyed me about the US health care debate was the denial, even by some opponents of socialised medicine, of the existence of those sinister 'death panels'.

‘Death panels’ were an overblown claim – until now


Mother Left To Starve - Really? No Death Panels?

In other words, it was actually a 'conspiracy theory' (read: beyond the limits of acceptable discussion) to tell the truth; that American socialised medicine will have the same results as all other parallel systems.

Oh, we know. Ask any average brainwashed Brit about 'the health service' and rationing of care, and they will tell you that sometimes tough decisions have to be made. They don't question that perhaps there are other ways of doing things, though. It's just accepted as part of having a government run system with limited resources and bureaucrats (who know best) in charge of distributing them 'appropriately'.

This is your 'death panel'. (they're not really very NICE, it's kind of like Miniluv, Minitruth etc)

It is unquestionable.

I don't care even if you support the economic quasi-rape that is Dr Barry Soetero's Magick Formula (removes the baby boom retirement demographic crisis in one easy step).

Death panels, as you call them, are inseparable from government run health systems. You can't have your little commie pony without accepting that it will shit all over your driveway, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

We Brits should know...we're up to our knees in the stuff.

Criticism of Rand Paul Reveals The Real Racists

Opposition to government regulation of who businesses choose to deal with isn't racist



Rand Paul has come under reactionary criticism for stating his opposition to one particular part of the US Civil Rights Act, specifically the rule that businesses must comply with the same anti-discrimination law as the government. Oh, they think they've got him on this one...are we ready...OMG RACISSS!!!

It's pitiful really.

Consider this example. A business decides they don't want to serve blacks. What will then happen to that business? It will be shamed, boycotted, and most likely driven out of business or at least will incur major losses of both customers and public image.

In the modern era, by contrast, businesses are falling over themselves to appear tolerant and diverse. Why is this? (Clue: NOT because the government made a rule.)

The answer is, it's what the people want. Giving people what they want in the marketplace is good for business.

However, if you believe the people who think they've uncovered a bogeyman 'racist' here, most people can't wait to provoke people of other races by refusing to do business with them. Who is the one thinking backwardly here?

Oh, and of course, classic rule: whites are the only racists. See how quickly the insinuations of 'white' domination are raised? Although, could it not just as easily be a black owned business discriminating against white people? Actually, I wonder what some of these government schooled commies would say to that - a black or arab owned business refusing to serve white people? I bet they'd remind us that diversity is important in a multicultural society and that opposing such a business would be 'intolerant'.

Seriously. "White privilege" as taught widely at government schools is the most racist, defamatory concept present in western society today. It disgusted me when I encountered it in education; ironically most white kids are eager to believe that they must pay for the sin of being part of an allegedly 'oppressive' racial group.

I must be missing out; what privileges am I entitled to? I would like to be cut in on this white privilege deal, thank you very much. If, of course, it really does exist.

And so we have uncovered the real racists (they often call themselves 'progressives', ironically...are we in our promised 'post-racial' utopia yet, by the way? What ever would you fall back on when losing an argument if there was no more racism?). The truth hurts.

I for one respect all people, but I am not 'guilty', neither am I 'privileged', just for being white!

Don't Vote; It Only Encourages Them

by David Icke

"I watched Labour Party supporters cheering wildly whenever their candidates were announced to have won their seats when that party in government has been responsible for killing and maiming millions in wars justified by lies; has ceaselessly and viciously imposed an Orwellian police state; and has removed regulation from the banking system and then thrust upon the country astonishing levels of debt to bail out the banks amid their unregulated mayhem.

And here were these programmed people – computer terminals – cheering when another of this shower was elected back to parliament. But they wouldn’t compute the sheer lack of logic in their slapping palms because it is not about what is right or just – it is only about winning."

Full Article

Rothschild pet Mandy knows the truth:

Stephen Colbert Mentions Bilderberg Group on Air

Colbert, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, they're not bad people. They know their job, and they know where the line is so to speak. And it's good indeed when they push the boundaries a little and create some wonderfully awkward moments:

Scurry Back Into Your Holes - Fear Controls You

It's like herding animals. You can't herd them in fact, they must herd themselves, voluntarily.

Much of the perception of 'societal breakdown' that is going on, is designed to get you exactly where the game planners want you to be. They can't force you, not all of you, that is impossible. They can however manipulate you so you relinquish your freedom by choice.

For a perfect example, look at the two-party system, it's genius and perfect, as long as people don't have the knowledge to see through it. I have been watching the US health-care stuff lately, what a load of crap that is. Current system run by insurance monopolies, and the 'reform' merely forces everyone to buy insurance. Not that I like socialised medicine per se, but that is even worse than socialised medicine if you ask me.

But look at how it divides people. Look at how the process makes people scurry back into their little narrow left-right mindset. And because it's an all-out dogfight, oh you must do everything you can to stop/pass healthcare, anyone who steps out of that narrow left-right 'accepted area' and takes a broader look at things, they aren't doing their part to stop Pelosi or to stop the insurance companies. The freethinkers get the blame, eh Rush? Cheers, Fascist!

But the game is designed to be all-consuming. Drop everything and fight the healthcare issue now! Back our political party, it's the lesser of two evils! (No such thing)

It's happening over here too. How many times have you heard things like,
"A vote for the Lib Dems is as good as a vote for the Conservatives." (common Labour party talking point at general elections past and present)
Not that I like the LibDems (or indeed the LabCons) at all, but the point is that the polarised, who-will-win, it's-going-down-to-the-wire mentality cons people into thinking they must, urgently, support what they perceive to be the lesser of two evils. The path of least resistance. You social engineering propaganda geniuses! It works too.

And when you take a breather from the charade, take a step back, and ask yourself who really benefits from all this, then it becomes more clear. In the health 'debate', drug companies win either way; the current Western medical system is based on deceiving people about how to be healthy so they suffer perpetual illness which can be 'treated', but not 'cured'. At least, hopefully not 'cured', since that would mean no further profit can be extracted from you...how disappointing, nobody likes the chicken that doesn't lay eggs...

Yes, fear controls this global human farm. That's it. That's all that holds this system together, at different levels.

Fear sends people scurrying, sometimes reasonably, for cover. Much as Londoners hurtled into Anderson shelters during the Blitz, so people hurry to the nearest apparent safe point. The churches. Political parties. Leaders. Salvation.

But be careful, make sure your mental Anderson shelter isn't going to be locked from the outside once you dive in there. Your psyche imprisoning itself of its own volition. To escape the sheep dog, you ran into the sheep pen. Mind control and black magick.

The church says, No Heresy!
The political field says, No Conspiracy Theories!

And in the church, if you never breathe a mere syllable of Heresy, you succeed, go places, become respected. But the moment you breathe syllables of Heresy, no matter how truthful, you are cast aside because you don't serve the agenda. So everyone knows that to be successful in the church, you must never utter Heresy. Self perpetuating mind control.

And in the political field, if you never utter a word of Conspiracy Theories, you succeed, go places, become respected. But the moment you do start uttering about Conspiracy Theories, no matter how truthful, you are cast aside because you don't serve the agenda. So everyone knows that to be successful in the political field, you must never utter about Conspiracy Theories. Self perpetuating mind control.

THIS is the Matrix.

What if some of the things they call heresy and conspiracy theory, some of them, were the very things you need to reclaim your freedom? What if the norms they set give you a choice between tyranny with delusion and delusion with tyranny? What if the vast majority of the population are held in line by such things, entirely of their own volition?

Or to put it another way,

What if the 'hole' you are scurrying headfirst into, is your own arse?

"Women's Day" is an Old Soviet Propaganda Ploy

by Henry Makow
International Women's Day (Tuesday, March 9) is a longtime Communist propaganda gimmick. What does it say about us when an official Soviet holiday is enshrined in our mainstream culture? Clearly, Communism isn't dead; it has just morphed into other forms like this one.

It confirms Norman Dodd's famous claim that Ford Foundation President Rowan Gaither told him, in 1954, that the agenda was to "socially engineer" US life so that "that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union" as part of banker-controlled world government.

"Women's Day" pretends to celebrate women but the poster near my Winnipeg home in 2008 showed an ugly, surly shrew brandishing a hammer. She looks demonically possessed. The caption reads, "if I only had a hammer.."

She'd what? Hit men over the head? Tear down society? Smash women who want husbands and children?

This isn't far fetched. Under the dance notice, the poster actually says: "Come smash patriarchy at midnight!"

Women participating in the march are asked to bring "your hardhats, tool belts, safety vests and ideas for change." Typically Communists celebrate women by redefining them out of existence, as males i.e. carpenters.

Through its feminist surrogate, Communists have stripped women of a secure and honored social identity as wives and mothers, and made them workers and sexual commodities, to be discarded in depression or middle age.

Obviously this event is not about recognizing women for their grace, beauty, charm and intelligence. It is about cultivating a false sense of grievance and entitlement in order to manipulate them.

They used the same tactic with Jews, Blacks and Workers and harnessed these groups to their agenda. The ultimate goal is to concentrate all wealth and power in the sponsors of Communism: the Illuminati (Masonic) central banking cartel which is colonizing the whole world. The real meaning of "change" is the establishment of a totalitarian New World Order.

International Women's Day is hate against women and society perpetrated by the traitorous banker colonial establishment, which includes most politicians, educators and mass media. People who participate are dupes and "useful idiots."

It is a vestige of Communist "popular front" movements first organized in the 1930's to ensnare naive idealistic people using feel-good platitudes like "equality," "peace" and "human rights." These rubes didn't know that the movements were funded and run by Moscow. The purpose was to alienate the intelligentsia from their own society and make them amenable to the Communist agenda, ultimately "world government." This seems to have largely succeeded. (See the 1993 book "Double Lives" by Stephen Koch)

Communism is about divide and rule. International Women's Day was inaugurated in 1910 in Copenhagen by "The Socialist International" (i.e. Communists) to promote "women's rights." As the poster on the right indicates, it was celebrated in Soviet Russia.

Here is a Manifesto for International Women's Day published in the German "Die Kommunistin" March 2, 1921:

"To all working women! You who make demands and struggle count in the millions....In all countries where the disinherited surge forward under the sign of Communism against the exploiting and subjugating power of capitalism. On International Women's Day, mothers filled with pain, housewives bent with worry, exhausted working women, clerical workers, teachers and small property holders flow together." (Wiemar Republic Sourcebook, 1995)

Women's Day is designed to make women feel unequal and oppressed. For example, a page of "gender facts" tells them that "women do 2/3 of the world's work but get only 10% of the world's income." Thus, western women, the most favored generation in history, get a chip on their shoulder vicariously.

Women are being brainwashed to think their interests are separate from their own fathers, husbands, brothers and sons.

Thousands of events are planned around the world. For example, at the Unitarian Church in London Ont. an organization for Afghanistan women and girls "will honor and celebrate our local women with music, singing, dancing, and refreshments. All women and girls are welcome. Free event!" Sounds lesbian to me. In San Francisco, there will be a cocktail party and movie to highlight the plight of the women of Gaza.

What about the men and boys of Afghanistan and Gaza? Don't they count? In the name of equality, these Communist dupes are practicing inequality. By breaking up families,they will leave Muslim women and girls more vulnerable than ever.

CONCLUSION

The fact that Communist-inspired agitprop is part of mainstream culture is an example of how society has been subverted. Most people are not socialist, let alone Communist.

As long as a secret Illuminati clique (Communists, Zionists, Freemasons) is allowed to control government credit, subvert nations and plot world government, society is complicit in its own destruction. We will have no one to blame but ourselves.

Source

What Was COP15 Really Like?

Are you curious to know what it was really like in Copenhagen during COP15, other than what the mainstream news reported?

THIS is what the TV networks should be delivering, but aren't. And it's obvious that the few AGW 'deniers' there are more informed.

(I also find it funny that LaRouche blames everything on the British. Come on, we're not that bad! lol)

The GW activists are the nicest people - but my, are they brainwashed.

David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews

This is a British TV documentary intended to smear Icke by parroting the baseless ADL claim that when he says 'lizards' he refers to Jews. I think the ADL and the left wing fascist book burners come off much, much worse here. Take a look. What do you think?



Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5

Icke was/is right about a lot of things, ya know. As I say, is he a crazy genius or just crazy? I tend toward the former.

Little side note re part 2: I think it's fantastic that Jones and Icke started to unite and not in-fight a few years ago. I am not one of those who believes either of these figures to be a 'shill', they just have different opinions and ways of reaching people. And they are flawed average human beings in fairly difficult circumstances that would drive many others insane. I'll have to write about my views on Jones soon enough...

As for the racists and neo-Nazis, well they're always going to be around, much like racist black people or for that matter racist Zionist Jews or racist Nazi Germans or racist Fundamentalist Islamists. The agenda of groups like the ADL has nothing to do with stopping racism and everything to do with setting a precedent to crush free speech.

1. Ban freedom of expression for Nazis, Holocaust Deniers etc.
2. Equate every other dissenting view that exists with Nazism and Holocaust Denial. (maybe make them wear little yellow stars?)
3. EnDgAmE Nazi Style Thought-Police State.

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for those we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all" (that includes Holocaust Deniers who are currently imprisoned, by the way, or do your principles not apply to everyone?)

If you want to hear more of Icke's actual views, not what some anti-free speech cranks think are his views, see his (7hrs long) presentation here. Perhaps have some kind of drinking game - drink every time he mentions 'Jews'. Guarantee you'll finish sobre. And perhaps a little more aware of...many things. (That thing took me a week to get through, lol)

Who Got The Tea Parties Started?

If you don't already know this, the answer will surprise you. And no it's not some rightwing Fox business pundit.

Click here

Propaganda: Mixing of the Good and the Bad

I was reading this post here about George Soros, big time propagandist, which details what is allegedly his agenda. It's an interesting list - let's play a game. Good or Bad? I'm sure your views won't be the same as mine, but here:

the Soros agenda:

• promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation

Overall good, with the caveat that other nations are generally more oppressive

•promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States

Generally bad

•opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act

Good

•depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral

Good (it's time someone did)

•promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws

Promoting freedom of movement OK, promoting mass immigration bad

•promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes

Bad

•promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens

Bad

•defending the civil rights and liberties of suspected anti-American terrorists and their abettors

Good

•financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left

None of my damn business

•advocating America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending

Disarmament bad, cutting spending good

•opposing the death penalty in all circumstances

I lean good on this one

•promoting socialized medicine in the United States

Bad bad bad

•promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is ’not clean air and clean water, [but] rather … the demolition of technological/industrial civilization”

Doubleplusungood

•bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations

UNspeakably bad

•promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike

Truly bad

•promoting taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand

Bad

•advocating stricter gun-control measures

Off the scale, crimes-against-humanity bad

•advocating the legalization of marijuana

Good (shame he chickens out on legalising heroin and crack, in my opinion)

I would like to add a few:
- Telling the left they can simultaneously oppose one military atrocity in Iraq, yet defend another identical occupation in Afghanistan
- Promoting pro-Israel, pro-ethnic cleansing views amongst the left wing
- Profiting from others' misfortune to the extent that you can proclaim you are 'having a great crisis' (which you clearly were involved in creating since you saw it coming)

That will do. Did I mention Soros was a Nazi collaborator who pretended to be a Christian during the Holocaust, but at the same time had no problem with serving his more pure masters? Then he was whisked off to Britain, the real global Nazi HQ, straight after the war to be trained as I guess a replacement for Goebbels. A Jewish Nazi. Interesting.

Keynes vs Hayek - Economic Rap?!?

Actually this is a pretty detailed introduction to Austrian vs Keynesian economics. I thought economics was only for white boys?* Pimpin'.



It is a blessing that many right wingers have ditched the Chicago Boys' supply-side economics and pro-central bank monetarism in favour of Austrian School, largely thanks to the advocacy of the Ron Paul/End the Fed movement. As for the steroetypically left-wing Keynesianism, well surely only someone who has been through many years of government (re-)education could believe that crazy stuff. Paper money is wealth!

Parable of the Broken Window - why government spending doesn't help an economy

Being the paranoid nut I am, I would add that Keynesianism, like the Communist Manifesto, was never intended to benefit people - but invented solely to provide intellectual 'justification' for grand thefts and crimes against the people of all kinds.

"Scientific dictatorship"

* clearly, you aren't born a 'white boy', it's a state of mind. Those players in the video are 'black' because they be pimpin'. (Ah, the fun one can have with a subculture designed to perpetuate racial division...)

How do people get into Hitler/Stalin apologism?

It's an odd thing, since they were both undeniably brutal dictators. But if you look far enough on the web there are people who will defend, to the last, these men. Like they were their own family.

(It must be hard having to step over all those corpses to get up the aisle, hmm?)

Remember, how do you get people to go along with evil? You supply a problem, which generates the desired reaction, causing the subject to warm to the 'solution', which is in reality not a solution at all but what you wanted them to go along with.

See, with those who defend or apologise for Communism in general and Stalin in particular, it seems to be about capitalism and inequality of wealth. The problem. This causes the reaction, which is a demand for the use of force on a massive scale to rebuild society in a 'more equal' manner. This is the solution.

Via this worldview, Communism almost becomes merely a naive failed experiment. Many leftists have a soft spot for Communism because after all, if it was done properly, it would be ideal. Right? Then throw in some nostalgia partly supplied by pop culture and Che, airbrush over gulags, secret police and genocide, et voila - Comrade Stalin is merely a well-intentioned hero of the working class who has been sorely miscast by biased capitalist Western history.

We can play the same game with the Hitler apologists. With fascism the problem is cultural degradation, usurping racial groups, and a lack of order, pride, direction etc, among the nation/people. The reaction is therefore a demand for the use of force to restore perceived ideals like racial and cultural identity, patriotism, pride, and a hostility to outsiders. Solution.

Again, whether they admit it or not, many right wingers have a soft spot for fascism. They generally turn a blind eye to military corporatism, believing it to be essential to build a strong people capable of going into the world and smashing skulls. Which must be done, even if unprovoked, because without this the society cannot prove itself to the world and to the pages of history. They also have sympathy for racial purges and racial segregation, on the grounds of purity (even today, look at some peoples' proposed immigration solutions).

The other thing regarding specifically Hitler apologists, is they see the Jewish people as a collective to be blamed for the undoubtable human suffering caused by, at its root, the manipulation of money for the ends of a few. I don't give a damn if every money changer is Jewish like the Rothschilds (actually they aren't, the Rockefellers for example aren't Jewish). The fact is that ordinary Jews are opressed by the very same system as everyone else. This does not detract from the heinous crimes of political Zionism, which alongside some strains of Islamofascism is as close as one can be to a modern day equivalent of National Socialism.

If, however, you believe all of the world's 12-18 million Jews are the problem, then I guess making apologies for Hitler is pretty easy. Just wash over the Gestapo and everything else, also the fact that Hitler staged a terror attack on one of his own bases, blamed it on Polish terrorists before attacking Poland (clearly showing the Nazis aimed to start a war) and aggressively pursued Lebensraum in the East, essentially by ethnic cleansing and genocide - ignore all this and Hitler becomes a kind of hero of the opressed white people, who only has the bad reputation he has due to the meddling Jewish writers of history.

Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were, in practice, mirror images of one another.

See, here I am suggesting individual sovereignty, I must be crazy! No use of force to fix society? Outrageous. How would anything get done?

The true message of libertarianism is not utopian as some accuse; but anti-utopian, in the sense that it does not support the idea that violence is necessary in order to acheive a utopian vision, whether communist or nationalist or whatever else. "Freedom is more important than someone's good idea." Defend yourself by all means, but otherwise live and let live.

Wisdom from Ghandi:
"The ideally non-violent state will be an ordered anarchy. That State is the best governed which is governed the least."

"You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty."

A few disclaimers:
1. I know this post is Jewish propaganda which besmirches Herr Hitler.
1a) I know the ADL are anti-free speech, by the way, and that is very wrong of them.
2. I know this post is Western capitalist propaganda which insults Comrade Stalin.
Bases covered.