The New Hate Filled 10:10 Anti-CO2 Campaign

Literally - reduce your CO2 output, or we will use our magic button to make you explode! No pressure.



video via Left Coast Rebel

Note: can you believe they tried to hide this video? The original is now private. Thankfully someone uploaded a copy of it. Nowhere to hide for these econazis.

Also there's some funny comments from mostly hostile visitors here (update - site has now been pulled, lol):
http://www.1010global.org/no-pressure
"You want violence? Bring it on, bunnyfuckers." LOL

Why the hate? Whenceforth doth it come?

Environmentalism is supposed to be about stopping actual environmental crimes, like the death-by-corexit currently going on in the Gulf. This is not environmentalism, it is Communism, and if you don't reduce your sacred Carbon Footprint, that is counter-revolutionary activity punishable, appropriately, by death. As Joseph once said, it solves all problems.

I said it before, I'll say it again, this is an orchestrated attempt to turn out a generation who are ready and willing to dress up in green police uniforms and kill kill kill anyone who isn't doing enough to save the pwecious 'endangered' polar bears. Anyone, that is, who is independent from the control system. (the royalty can have their palaces though, it's ok because "they bring in more money from tourism...")

How about listing humans as an endangered species instead, if this bollocks is considered acceptable.

Burn something or turn the heating up on 10/10, or just enjoy what few conventional light bulbs we still have since they are now banned by the EU. Never did like the dull ugly 'eco friendly' ones, and that was before I found out they give off X-rays and contain mercury. Oh yes they do.

Good News From Iceland, Free Speech Haven

WikiLeaks Inspired "New Media Haven" Proposal Passes In Icelandic Parliament
Information Clearing House

The WikiLeaks advised proposal to build an international "new media haven" in Iceland, with the world's strongest press and whistleblower protection laws, and a "Nobel" prize for
for Freedom of Expression, has unanimously passed the Icelandic Parliament.

50 votes were cast in favor, zero against, one abstained. Twelve members of parliament were not present.

Full Article

Would the Cumbria massacre have happened without the Firearms Acts?

The LPUK blog breaks it down.

http://lpuk.blogspot.com/2010/06/would-cumbria-massacre-have-happened.html

"Death Panels" Were Inevitable, Not A Fiction

One thing that always annoyed me about the US health care debate was the denial, even by some opponents of socialised medicine, of the existence of those sinister 'death panels'.

‘Death panels’ were an overblown claim – until now


Mother Left To Starve - Really? No Death Panels?

In other words, it was actually a 'conspiracy theory' (read: beyond the limits of acceptable discussion) to tell the truth; that American socialised medicine will have the same results as all other parallel systems.

Oh, we know. Ask any average brainwashed Brit about 'the health service' and rationing of care, and they will tell you that sometimes tough decisions have to be made. They don't question that perhaps there are other ways of doing things, though. It's just accepted as part of having a government run system with limited resources and bureaucrats (who know best) in charge of distributing them 'appropriately'.

This is your 'death panel'. (they're not really very NICE, it's kind of like Miniluv, Minitruth etc)

It is unquestionable.

I don't care even if you support the economic quasi-rape that is Dr Barry Soetero's Magick Formula (removes the baby boom retirement demographic crisis in one easy step).

Death panels, as you call them, are inseparable from government run health systems. You can't have your little commie pony without accepting that it will shit all over your driveway, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

We Brits should know...we're up to our knees in the stuff.

Oath Keepers: Some Katrina Troops DID Refuse To Confiscate Guns

Oathkeepers Exclusive:

BREAKING NEWS! Oath Keepers Proves That There WERE Troops Who Refused to Confiscate Guns During Katrina

We know that wholesale gun confiscation happened during Hurricane Katrina. We watched the Chief of Police of New Orleans declare on national television that “no one [no private citizen] will be able to be armed, we’re going to take all the weapons.” We watched an old lady being tackled in her own kitchen and disarmed.

In fact, that atrocious event was one of the reasons I started Oath Keepers. But I also knew, from my service as an Army paratrooper, that there are men and women of courage, honor, and integrity in the military who would refuse to obey such orders. My goal with Oath Keepers is simply to increase their numbers and harden their resolve. But when it came to Katrina, we did not have concrete proof that some said no – until now.

Full Article

What the article doesn't tell you explicitly is that the government is giving the troops these kind of questionnaires (like 'would you shoot your fellow citizens'), for the purpose of singling out and PROMOTING the troops who will 'just follow orders' in these type of situations.

Which is exactly why groups like Oath Keepers are vital.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2009/03/03/declaration-of-orders-we-will-not-obey/

"Machete": Provoking A Race War?

Film depicts Mexicans going 'across the border' to machete the 'racist' white people

First of all check out Son3's post on this.

There is definitely an agenda afoot to use the racial division to provoke outright hostility between, in America's case, latinos and whites. And it's not much different between arabs and whites in "Eurabia", or in other words the mass immigration of arabs into Europe.

No I don't think banning the burka is a wise idea, by the way, neither do I think Arizona's new immigration law is going to help. See, they could already deport illegal immigrants, without having to do racial profiling and stopping random people going about their business. (The problem is the police are complicit with illegal immigration in the first place, they need to stop their complicity and actually deport people rather than looking the other way - they do not need any new powers to do this, you see?)

And it's going to turn nasty, like this from Seattle:
U.S. police in 'Rodney King' beating of Mexican as officer is filmed stamping on man's head

The point is, it takes two to tango. Alienating latinos by passing racial profiling laws like the one in Arizona won't help. It gives the impression that whites and the police are siding against the Mexicans, us against them, see? That is the basis of world control. There are forces behind this, i.e. the state and the social engineers, who want nothing more than to cause chaos here, in order to offer their 'solution', which means more power for them.

I would suggest that brewing immigration wars are an ideal pretext to push for ID cards or microchipping...after all, if you're a 'legal citizen', what have you got to hide?

Airport Naked Body Scanners: Useless, Perverted, and Orwellian

So...
They do take a pretty picture of your, or (even better) your child's, genitalia.

They would not stop even a non-CIA underpants bomber.

They store a 360º nude image of all who pass through, violating child porn laws and any sense of human decency.

They blast you with radiation that increases risk of cancer.

And the people manning them are perverts with small dicks.

Anything else to add? I mean, maybe you should be brain scanned before boarding a flight to make sure you aren't having any dangerous thoughts? Microchips could prevent people from entering unauthorised areas of the airport. Perhaps the infamous Taser Bracelets ought to be mandated in the name of security?

With a little imagination there are infinite possible ways to make you more safe as you travel. And every one of them might prevent a possible dangerous incident, so they must be implemented immediately...

Oh, you don't want that much police state?

So there is a line that is too much?

Where is it then?

Draw it out in your mind.

... See, it wasn't long ago that underwear bombers were the object of satire. Now the government needs them to implement the next stage of the creeping police state. Look back and see how far we've come, one step at a time...and all based on lies...

Don't help people reduce taxes, don't download "extreme material"

Just another two to add to the things you can and cannot do.

Internet Police: London Signs Warn Against Accessing “Extremist” Material

New great idea: advise someone how to reduce their taxes and you can be fined £5000. Freedom!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1271398/Big-brother-law-threatens-innocent-advice-Tax-chat-land-5-000-fine.html

US Military train to take on the Tea Party?

This is what Oath Keepers was created for. The good sign is that details of the excercise were leaked from within by soldiers...

US Army Trains To Confront Tea Party 'Terrorists'
Military personnel blow the whistle on exercise which involved troops taking protesters to concentration camps

by Paul Joseph Watson

In a shocking development that outstrips even the infamous MIAC report, it has emerged via whistleblowers that the U.S. Military in Kentucky is training to confront Tea Party protesters and anti-government demonstrators, who in official intelligence advisories are described as bomb-making terrorists.

Full Article

More ADL Nonsense: "Violent Voices" Oppose Obamacare

Funny, the ADL's official mandate is to "stop the defamation of the Jewish people". Now they adopt a broad interpretation of that at the best of times, but frankly is this any of their business?

ADL Calls For “Major Law Enforcement Operation” To Deal With Obamacare Critics

by Paul Joseph Watson

A major Anti-Defamation League report goes further than ever before in an effort to purge the Internet of all dissent, listing completely non-violent criticism of Obamacare posted on Internet forums as a reason to conduct a “major law enforcement operation” against opponents of big government and health care reform.

The ADL’s April 2010 report is entitled, “Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity,” and consists largely of lists of comments culled from alternative news websites and forums, as well as Fox News.

“During the first few months of 2010, anti-government extremism has taken on a new level of intensity in the United States. The arrests of the Hutaree militia in Michigan illustrate this passion, which exists both within and outside the militia movement. Unfortunately, the Hutaree arrests may come to be seen not as the culmination, but rather as a first step in what may need to become a major national law enforcement operation,” states the introduction.

Full Story

ADL Report - Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity

Choose!

Source

Digital Economy Act: This Means War

by Cory Doctorow for The Guardian

Baking surveillance, control and censorship into the very fabric of our networks, devices and laws is the absolute road to dictatorial hell

With the rushed passage into law of the Digital Economy Act this month, the fight over copyright enters a new phase. Previous to this, most copyfighters operated under the rubric that a negotiated peace was possible between the thrashing entertainment giants and civil society.

But now that the BPI and its mates have won themselves the finest law that money can buy – a law that establishes an unprecedented realm of web censorship in Britain, a law that provides for the disconnection of entire families from the net on the say-so of an entertainment giant, a law that shuts down free Wi-Fi hotspots and makes it harder than ever to conduct your normal business on the grounds that you might be damaging theirs – the game has changed.

Full Article

All You Need to Know About Naked Body Scanners

More

When did 'anti-government' become a bad thing?

by J.D. Tuccile

(Above: Henry David Thoreau)

You'd think that, after a couple of centuries of major American figures describing government as, at most, something to be tolerated, political pundits would have made their peace with the idea that skepticism toward state power has a core place in American political life. If your toes tingle at the thought of more coercive programs, laws, politicians and bureaucrats, you're the (very) odd duck, not the folks with anti-government views. And yet, we still get the likes of Frank Rich throwing high-profile hissy fits because "the unhinged and sometimes armed anti-government right that was thought to have vaporized after its Oklahoma apotheosis is making a comeback," as heralded by ... Andrew Joseph Stack III's Kamikaze-style airborne attack on the Internal Revenue Service building in Austin, Texas?

For those not in the know, Stack, like many people, had a bone to pick with the I.R.S. and with the federal government. But the manifesto he left behind also accused drug and insurance companies of "murdering tens of thousands of people a year," charged that poor people get to die for the mistakes of the wealthy, and quoted Karl Marx. Anti-government Stack was, but his ideology, such as it was, doesn't appear to have been coherently right-wing or left-wing so much as ticked-off and populist.

Rich does appear to be aware that Stack isn't a very logical stick with which to beat the Tea Party movement that has him and his government-cheerleading chums so knicker-twisted. At least, he concedes "it would be both glib and inaccurate to call him a card-carrying Tea Partier or a 'Tea Party terrorist.' But he did leave behind a manifesto whose frothing anti-government, anti-tax rage overlaps with some of those marching under the Tea Party banner."

Nice how Rich works that gratuitious "Tea Party terrorist" bit in there, eh? But even as he smears his political opponents as guilty by distant and tortured association, he manages to overlook the fact that the anti-government sentiment he so regrets is neither a wholly owned subsidiary of the Tea Party movement and the Right, nor an aberration coughed up every decade or two by by unenlightened neanderthals briefly emerging from the philosophical swamps.

Frank Rich is a well-educated man with an Internet connection paid for by a respected news organization that has a vast historical archive of its own, so it's impossible to believe that the New York Times scribbler is unaware that Thomas Paine wrote in one of the more popular political tracts of the revolutionary period that "government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one." Nor can we believe he's unaware that James Madison hedged on Paine's sentiments only to the extent that he wrote, "It has been said that all Government is an evil. It would be more proper to say that the necessity of any Government is a misfortune." And certainly he knows about Thomas Jefferson's warning that "[t]he natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."

And Rich must surely be aware that he's skipping over a bit of context when he drops the overworked Joe Stack connection to shriek in shock that "[t]he Tea Partiers want to eliminate most government agencies, starting with the Fed and the I.R.S., and end spending on entitlement programs. They are not to be confused with the Party of No holding forth in Washington -- a party that, after all, is now positioning itself as a defender of Medicare spending. What we are talking about here is the Party of No Government at All." Surely, if only in high school, he read Henry David Thoreau's open hostility to the power of the state:

I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe--"That government is best which governs not at all"...

The United States of America was founded on anti-government sentiment. The shapers of its institutions and many of its major thinkers have always clearly viewed the state as something like the equivalent of a portable kerosene heater in a Wisconsin winter -- you might need the damned thing, but be very careful.

True, the fact that the heart and soul of American political history is thoroughly skeptical of government power doesn't mean that Madison and Jefferson were right and that Rich is wrong. Maybe he and his buddies are correct and we should stop worrying and learn to love big, well-armed institutions that claim a monopoly on the use of force and slaughtered 262,000,000 people over the course of the 20th century alone. (It's for the children, don't you know?)

But history shows that anti-government sentiment is in the mainstream of American political life, and Rich and his buddies are the out-liers. No shrieking effort to paint skeptics of state power as kamikaze terrorists -- shoe-horning Joe Stack in with Thomas Paine and Henry David Thoreau -- can change that fact.

Original Article

Anarchy...But Who Will Build Roads?

"...it is precisely the same logic that statists have regarding the concept of roads without the omnipotent state running the show. ("What if no one makes roads? What if they charge too much? What if they don't make a road for me? . . .") What if you get a grip and stop pretending the world should be, or could be micromanaged?

The usual result of collectivist crises such as this is to advocate state coercion to solve the problem. Trouble is, it never solves the problem, it removes the incentives to do the job well, and it is immoral..."
Full Article

Good site, nogov4me.net

(Little note about the symbolism above: although I do like it, both the peace sign, which was originally a witchcraft sign representing the broken cross, and the dollar sign, which is a coded reference to the goddess Isis, both are used in good faith here by the maker of this sign - describing the duality of the good aspects of the left and right political wings, but clearly they can refer to multiple things. If that bothers you.)

David Cameron Will Create Fatherland Gestapo

This is who you're voting for. Why are you even voting at all? It changes nought.

David Cameron promises to create 'neighbourhood army'

Isn't it odd, though, because all nations operate independently and are not run by the same clique of international bankers; what a coincidence it is that stateside, Barry Soetero runs on a platform of Change and goes on to announce an "Obama Youth"...and then we have a repeat of this just 18 months later in Britain! It almost makes you believe that national sovereignty is just an illusion and we truly live on a global(ised) farm with black magickians feeding off our every negative output. Silly thought?

Incrementalism. Of course it's not a gestapo yet, but the whole point is you won't bat an eyelid as the prison is built, piece by piece, around you. Then perhaps when it's too late you realise you're the one in the striped pajamas receiving food through a hole in the door (i.e. a supermarket), you wonder what the hell is going on. Too late!

Am I the only one thinking, it doesn't have to be like this? Rhetorical question. Not true, I know. And it doesn't. But you think voting will stop the police state? If so, why is it still allowed?

The Beast cannot be brought to bear by appointing slightly nicer people to represent It. It's still The Beast. But The Beast needs your attention and compliance, that is its food. So now you know how to Starve The Beast.

Health Care Reform Bill: Pharma-Dominated Sickness and Suffering

by Mike Adams

Today the medical mafia struck another devastating blow to the health and freedom of all Americans. With the support of an inarguably corrupt Congress that has simply abandoned the real needs of the American people, the sick-care industry has locked in a high-profit scheme of disease and monopoly-priced pharmaceuticals in a nation that can ill afford either one.

And this Pharma-funded betrayal, it turns out, was led by the Democrats. Passed on a 219-212 vote that was only accomplished thanks to closed-door, last-minute secret meetings among the last holdouts, this new legislation puts America under the stranglehold of the medical mafia while doing absolutely nothing to address real health care reform. There is no mention in the bill, for example, of vitamin D for preventing cancer, or orthomolecular medicine for preventing degenerative disease. There's not even a word about protecting health freedom or ending the century of oppression that has been waged against naturopathic practitioners by the AMA, FDA and FTC.

The new legislation does, however, lock in billions of dollars in monopoly profits for the pharmaceutical companies -- the same companies who spent millions of dollars pushing for its passage and who depend on the continuation of sickness and disease for their future profits.

There's only one problem with this health care reform bill: It doesn't reform health care. It has almost nothing to do with health care at all, in fact: It's really more of an effort to expand a broken sick-care system. When faced with the problem that our sick-care system doesn't work, Congress somehow decided that fixing the problem merely involved expanding the failures to include everyone!

And you don't even get a choice in the matter, either. All Americans are now required to pay into a sick-care system of monopolized, pharmaceutical medicine even if they reject that failed system of medicine. So the healthy people who actually take responsibility for their health are financially penalized and forced to subsidize profits for drug companies!

Full article

Shameless Anti-Free Speech Basterds

The Simon Wiesenthal Center labels questioning government 'hate'

Not kidding!

Said it before, will say it again, these guys, like the ADL and the SPLC don't give a damn about Jews, blacks or anybody. Their agenda is to sow racial tension and crush free speech by saying there are tons of dangerous hateful people out there who we must censor now, or else!

Bollocks. These groups *need* racists to be around, so they can continue to justify their existence. Sometimes I wonder to what extent these groups actually go out of their way to support these racist types.

So don't be racist, not just because it's wrong and a denial of individualism, also because you're just giving them ammo to come after free speech. But that said, at the same time, don't fall for their little trick of saying having an opinion is racist - like not supporting Obama means you hate black people for example, which is really at the ridiculous end of things.

Can you believe the audacity of these groups? You'd think, as Ayn Rand (a Jewish woman herself) said, if they wanted to defend minorities they would start with the individual, since they are the smallest minority. But apparently not.

The 9/11 Cat is out of the bag

by Stewart Ogilby

The lid is blowing off a story broadcast by American TV on September 11, 2001. The question now is whether or not owners and managers of America's mainline media will be able to continue burying facts, questions, controversy, speculations, and conclusions contradicting that day's professionally crafted narrative. When will the American people be given access to documented facts unearthed over the years since that tragic and exceptional day?

We were told repeatedly, even while the towers in New York were still standing, that a man in a cave in Afghanistan was responsible. We were led to believe that he managed a group of Arab terrorists who flew our commercial airliners on 911. As proof, his picture was repeatedly flashed across major TV networks with the smoking buildings in the background. Today, our own FBI claims they lack any evidence linking that man to 9/11.

We are still repeatedly shown, in newspapers and on TV, photos of 19 "Arab terrorists" supposedly on the planes, with no other proof of their even being there. Poorly produced and obviously faked videos of the big boogyman have been trotted out periodically. Where were they produced? The "flying Arabs" keep turning up alive and well. Who stole, forged, and assumed their identities? Other Arabs? Why?

There is evidence that the boogyman was seriously ill with kidney disease requiring dialysis, and that he died late in December, 2001. The CIA knew this because he was one of their assets right up until 911. What an ideal patsy, if there ever was one! Dead men tell no tales and they can never be captured.

We are now told by over a thousand architects and engineers that steel and concrete buildings do not explosively disintegrate due to fires within them. What really happened? Why have our leaders and pundits carefully avoided explaining the obvious demolition of WTC-7 hours later? Many of us think we know why.

Wars, torture, bankruptcy, the Patriot Act's overturning of our cherished Bill of Rights, official lies, scare propaganda, a police-state mentality, are these intended consequences of planning and executing the improbable events of that day?

If H.L. Mencken were alive today and writing for newpapers he would be having a field-day other than for the fact that his articles would never be seen in today's press. As I watch "911 truth" unfold I am reminded of Mencken's comment when asked why he, who was critical of this country, did not simply leave. Mencken quickly replied, "Why do men go to zoos?"

If the consequences to my country were considerably less than those resulting from Sept. 11, 2001, I, like Mencken, would find the spectacle to be incomparably amusing. We will all watch the spectacle unfold because the cat is out of the bag. Nobody and nothing can put it back in. Amusing is one thing it is not.

Some things I do know about my fellow countrymen. We have been free in the past, and have developed a uniquely American sense of personal independence and comraderie. We have historically been slow to rise in anger. TV is powerful but we know it is not real. It is an illusion. In the real world, civilized human beings understand that to conquer lies and murder the forces necessary are truth and justice.

Today we recoil in horror and in anger at those criminally responsible for 911. If we discover that those responsible for the murders of our citizens and the destruction of our heritage are, in fact, among us, we will demand the removal of those directly responsible and of accesssories before and after the fact.

I am turning 77 in two months and I love life. The other day I hired a personal nutritionalist because I want to lose 30-40 pounds which can be life-shortening at my age. I also have a personal trainer, as I want to maintain physical health and stamina. I want to be around to see what happens when Americans repudiate what TV and a controlled press has obliged viewers to believe happened on September 11, 2001.

I will, to the best of my ability, support the identification and prosecution of traitors to the best country in the world, the one in which I grew up. This each of us owes to America's next generation. Any alternative is unacceptable.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (<-- over 1000 of them! But you never see them on TV...)

Instead in TV Land you get this BS: "9/11 Truther Goes Postal" (the reporter accidentally says '9/11 demolitions' at 0:46 in that report...Freudian slip...some of the news people even know they're selling you lies...)

And oh, boy, yes 9/11 was certainly a TERRORIST attack...but WHO COMMANDS THE TERRORISTS is the real question. Qui bonum? I actually do want to stop THE TERRORISTS responsible for 9/11. Who wouldn't? It's just that the real terrorists got us to chase after some phoney ones supposedly based thousands of miles away, that's all. 'Al-Qaeda' is based in Langley, Virginia, among other places, and that's not me talking; that's the (unfortunately dead from a 'heart attack' weeks after stating this) UK politician Robin Cook. Brave man in the end, he fell on his sword it would seem.

The Potential for 'Mental Health' Tyranny

Recently we have seen a large number of media pieces intended to suggest people with certain views or convictions are in fact suffering from a mental 'problem'. See these examples:

The several varieties of gun nuts (via Conservative Scalawag)

WND: Veteran psychiatrist calls liberals mentally ill

CNN: Conspiracy Theorists Are Potential "Suicide Warriors" & Are Mentally Disturbed

Psychology Today piece links 'conspiracy thinking' to mental illness

Telegraph: Climate 'denial' is now a mental disorder

Mothers' Act: Branding pregnancy as mental illness

ABC News: As Conspiracy Communities Grow, Mental Health Docs Left With Big Questions

Brisbane Times: Mental illness affects four out of five

First of all let me get the obvious out of the way: drug companies and their cartel friends in government make a killing out of mental illness, and are more than happy to make new ones up for their own financial gain. But that's not the only motive for this.

The broadening of the interpretation of what is 'mental illness' presents a threat to our freedoms because it may allow governments to classify their political enemies (that is, the people) as insane or mentally ill, and dangerous. Now currently we have a system that locks away people who are deemed clinically insane and a danger to the public. I'm not saying that is completely a good or bad thing; it is what it is. But it is the potential, again I must stress, that tyrannical government may broaden the definition of mental illness for its own ends. It's just another angle to be aware of, from which what relative freedom we have today may be attacked.

Oh and just so you know, I don't believe psychiatrists to be our friends...
http://www.tuberose.com/Psychiatric_Insanity.html
...but that probably means that I am the one who is 'insane' and needs to be diagnosed by them and drugged.

Nice how their sick little mind control game works, isn't it? (Of course, they aren't the mentally ill ones, no sir not at all...)

Reminder: plenty of Conspiracy Theories have been proven to be true, here's 33 of them. So really the biggest 'mental illness', if you want to call it that, is that which afflicts the 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' MSM-worshipping section of the population.

"What do you mean the CIA got visas for the 9/11 hijackers? Paranoia! Paranoia! Those people are insane!"

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. ... I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it." - John Lennon