Hungary: Rothschild/Soros Frontman Introduces Press Censorship - "Fairness Doctrine" Style

"
'As the world's attention focuses on WikiLeaks and the debate it has spawned about the extent of press freedom in the information age, one European country has taken a decisive step away from that freedom.

Hungary's recently elected right-wing government has introduced a law demanding -- under threat of fines and even shut-down -- that news sources be "fair and balanced," to borrow a phrase from a US news network. The move has critics fearing that it could lead to a silencing of critical media outlets.

Under the new Law on Media and the Freedom of Press, national TV channels whose news coverage is found to be "unbalanced or offensive to human dignity or common morals" could be fined the equivalent of almost $1 million, reports the New York Times, while daily newspaper and Internet news sites could face fines of up to $120,000. Weeklies and magazines could see fines of almost $50,000.'
"

Story and good analysis by David Icke here

Hand signals, you can believe in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Orb%C3%A1n

START Treaty is Really the United Nations Global Military Regime Treaty

"
With little notice from the average joe on the street, the plan for complete and total disarmament in a supposedly peaceful world continues its way toward completion. Known as the START Treaty, the agenda to turn over total military control to the United Nations is being carried out by the Obama administration, in cooperation of the Russian government and the United Nations body.

The Senate is expected as early as Wednesday to discuss the ratification of the treaty with the Russian government, as soon as the Tax package is taken care of stated Harry Reid on Tuesday.

And in order to keep the guise of fighting for the American people, the right side of the "two headed- one party" system has their republicans who have stepped up to "oppose" the Treaty. When asked, however, if the 67 votes needed to ratify the treaty were there, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was confident that the 67 votes were assured.

"To have transparency, to understand the rules by which to put structure to that activity, we need START and we need it badly," said General James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at a White House briefing.

White House Press Secretary (for the Obama Ministry of Truth) Robert Gibbs said Friday that the chamber would remain in session this year for as long as necessary to ratify the START agreement.

Of course through the years, the United States and Russia has played out the "cold war" operation scaring the hell out of the masses with the threat of Nuclear Annihilation, and with the intent of convincing the nations to sign treaties reducing nuclear stockpiles to almost nothing while at the same time giving more authority to the rogue criminal organization called the United Nations.

According to a little discussed document known as "Department of State Publication 7277", published in 1961 during the Kennedy administration, and titled "Freedom from War : The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World", the real agenda is to bring all national military forces under the control of the United Nations.

The name of this force, according to the document, would be called The United Nations Peace Force, and would be comprised of internal police/military forces of each of the countries of the world.

Under the section DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES the document states:

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
"

http://werhit-mathenyahu.blogspot.com/2010/12/start-treaty-is-really-united-nations.html

Alleged 'Scientists' Call For Rationing at Cancun Climate Summit

Prof Anderson admitted it “would not be easy” to persuade people to reduce their consumption of goods.

He said politicians should consider a rationing system similar to the one introduced during the last “time of crisis” in the 1930s and 40s.

This could mean a limit on electricity so people are forced to turn the heating down, turn off the lights and replace old electrical goods like huge fridges with more efficient models. Food that has travelled from abroad may be limited and goods that require a lot of energy to manufacture.

“The Second World War and the concept of rationing is something we need to seriously consider if we are to address the scale of the problem we face,” he said.

Prof Anderson insisted that halting growth in the rich world does not necessarily mean a recession or a worse lifestyle, it just means making adjustments in everyday life such as using public transport and wearing a sweater rather than turning on the heating.

“I am not saying we have to go back to living in caves,” he said. “Our emissions were a lot less ten years ago and we got by ok then.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/8165769/Cancun-climate-change-summit-scientists-call-for-rationing-in-developed-world.html

They fly out to exotic locations, just so they can tell you they want to subject you to rationing. It's not because they haven't heard of skype, no, it's because this is the climate religion, where the high priesthood get to travel and eat meat and, I don't know, heat their homes. And you don't, damn filthy humans overpopulating everywhere.

We need a pandemic like Dr Pianka said, that will clean some of you up. Although really Pianka didn't go far enough, the Church of Euthanasia got it right. Visualise voluntary human extinction! I wonder how many of these alleged climate scientists are part of the C of Euth. Do they like to watch the plane coming in?

US and Britain in Partnership to Standardise Domination

"It is an unfortunate reality that whatever policies are implemented in the UK are eventually implemented here in the United States. It was only a short time before Britain’s increased domestic surveillance, horrid healthcare system, and curtailment of free speech reached the shores of America.

Of course, the United States serves as a breeding ground for the exportation of its own brand of tyranny – i.e. militarized police forces etc.– to England. A more informed observer might view this trade-off of oppression as a more organized attempt at the implementation of a standardized system of domination . . . and this observer would be correct. But, regardless, it is true that even a casual observer can view the domestic policies of the country across the Atlantic as indications of what is coming to their own.

Recently, it was announced by the British government that 1 million elderly British citizens who have paid exorbitant taxes and endured sub-par healthcare for years will now be given a personal healthcare budget which they themselves will have to administer. After generations of being told that citizens were not individuals but part of the collective, British ministers are now claiming that healthcare can no longer be left to the state and that it is “everyone’s responsibility.” In past years, when Britons were being trained to accept higher taxes and reduction in healthcare, “everyone’s responsibility” meant the collective society as a whole bore the collective burden. Now, when healthcare rationing for the elderly becomes more prominent, “everyone’s responsibility” means that each individual has to worry about their own costs. Of course, there is no likelihood of taxes going down as a result. George Orwell’s Big Brother would indeed be proud of the doublespeak being successfully implemented in his home country today..."

Full Article

Fighting against English Supremacism was what 1776 was all about, a revolution to throw out the Crown control freaks. This whole 'British Israel', oh the US and UK are allies, is complete lies. Smell the treachery.

I vehemently dislike whenever you hear from some hubris filled Brit getting all defensive when someone dares be critical of the UK's soviet government or the evil of the Crown, or the fact that London is the epicentre of financial corruption. "Oh we're not that bad, America rules us!" lol. And the worst part is when Americans literally grovel before their British God and say America will never be as great as Britain with their royals, I read that on Huffington Post once, you couldn't make it up.

Blame the element within the alt-news world that always divert attention away from the Crown; I have found Paul Craig Roberts to be the primary one for this, he always blames America and Israel but never really discusses the English criminals. Likes to talk down America and call it a Nazi country and calls Americans serfs, but does not really explain why, which is because America has been slowly brought by the AAA back to colony status, pre 1776 status. Also funnily enough he does not seem to discuss his own role in helping to make Americans into serfs, during the Reagan-Thatcher period of selling off the farm to globalisation. (to be fair though, Reagan was nearly assassinated in '82, probably by Bush Sr/NaziCIA just like JFK, and Thatcher was politically assassinated when she wouldn't go along with the EU agenda, so it's not like they gleefully sold out of their own accord.)

Also notice that both English and Jewish elites always claim they are the bringers of civilisation and they are the most civilised. Liars. Slavers.

Ireland held at financial gunpoint

Ha ha ha ha. Anglo Irish Bank. ha ha ha.



One of the funniest lies I have seen spread about the recent EU/PIIGS thing, is the idea that Germany is still Nazi and really it is Germany zat is taking over Europe...seriously? Maybe it's time we got past this Germanophobia being spun by, well you know who by, the real Nazis. Somehow people have bought this whole German domination thing. No no no, if you're looking for megalomaniacs, look elsewhere.

Seriously, think of every film out of Hollyweird etc with the bad guy being the evil German or perhaps Serb (since the 90s) or even Russian. Certainly every video game where the evil Russians still want to take over the world. Little more than mass slander, fearmongering and outright lies. It wasn't Russia who attacked without provocation in Ossetia/Abkhazia in '08 now was it. But our media for a time reported that they did.

If you want to know where the power lies, ask who you cannot criticise. Simple.

The Irish (at least those who I can see on YT saying the EU is a German plot to take over Europe) would do well to understand that 'history', particularly their 'history' with the Crown, never stopped and is still ongoing, yknowhatimsayin?

Anglo Irish Bank. Look out, the Germans are trying to take over Ireland! Aaargh! They can't even deploy troops in another country without everyone being 'reminded' of their Nazi past, but they have somehow formented a plan to take over first Europe, then the world!!! Oh the plot's real, but it's not German. Give me a break.

EU Jesuit Herman von Rompuy says nation states are dead

The age of the nation state is over and the idea that countries can stand alone is an ‘illusion’ and a ‘lie’, the EU president believes.

In one of the most open proclamations of the goal of a European superstate since the heyday of Jacques Delors, Herman Van Rompuy went on to denounce Eurosceptism as the greatest threat to peace.

‘The biggest enemy of Europe today is fear,’ he said. ‘Fear leads to egoism, egoism leads to nationalism, and nationalism leads to war.

Full article
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

Liar. Imperialism and internationalism, and people like him who want to exercise power over others, are the causes of every war ever. Nationalism is the biggest threat to the all war all the time imperial freak show that is behind von Rompuy. Afghanistan for the Afghans, not for the Crown's opium pirates, for instance.

Everyone tries to link nationalism to war based on the Nazis, but if you look at it they were truly imperialists, internationalists, and Adolf did say he wanted a NWO. So according to the EU, if you have a problem with the Bilderberg Group founded by Prince Bernhard a former Nazi, which is a major force behind the European superstate (and the Euro), then it is you who is hateful and fearful.

Re 'fear', do you see the common strand between this and the Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz 'rally to restore sanity and/or fear'? What they say about 'fear' is a half truth, since the establishment right wing uses irrational fear of donkey riding kalashnikov toting 'ragheads' to sell their subjects on some war or another. But the establishment left wing goes further and says that it is irrational fear if you don't trust the government, or if you are at all upstanding against the Marxist flavour of control as well as the Neocon version.

Again we come back to the hypocrisy of hate, and who really hates, who it is that hates freedom and your right to think for yourself and not have everything dictated to you by a group of 'opinion formers', the media/academia/think tanks. Mad men like von Rompuy and those behind him are truly hateful.

Work Harder, ChiComm Slaves! - Says The Crown

Make the toxic plastic stuff we love to feed to those disgusting Western peasants...


The China powder keg: JOHN HUMPHRYS on a nation that's either on the edge of becoming THE superpower - or exploding into anarchy

The chanting, when it ­began, sounded angry. I was in my hotel room in Beijing trying to put ­together a report on ­political repression for the Today programme and this ­sounded as if it might be just what I needed.

I had been in China for more than a week. Everywhere I went people had been telling me that things had changed so much since I first started reporting from here more than 30 years ago that I would scarcely ­recognise the place.

True, there are many protests, sometimes violent, but almost always out in the ­provinces and motivated by a single ­grievance.

Yet here we were in the heart of the capital, a short stroll from Tiananmen Square, and something was going on. I grabbed my producer and, as the shouting grew louder, we ran outside — to be ­confronted by a tug-of-war.

The kitchen staff had challenged the hotel management to a contest and there they were in the middle of the street, heaving away on a thick rope, the chefs’ hats falling into the gutter, the managers’ ties askew, all of them shouting fit to burst. The ­managers won.

Not quite the scene I had imagined, but what’s interesting is that it is possible for a foreign journalist to wander the streets of this city, microphone at the ready, and nobody will take a blind bit of notice.

When I first started reporting from here, that would have been unimaginable.

We needed permits in triplicate to go anywhere and we were always accompanied by ­minders. Today it’s even possible — with a little effort — to talk to dissidents.

So here’s the first contradiction of ­modern China.

The Communist leadership of this country has an absolute monopoly on power, but foreign journalists have never been so free to ply their trade.

What’s even more remarkable is that so many people in senior Communist Party positions are now happy to admit openly that it’s a mistake to prevent ­Chinese ­people speaking freely to each other.

Not that they can say anything they choose.

...

The dangers are obvious. The leadership is about to publish a new five-year plan which will promise to raise the wages of those who are paid pathetically little. Given the pressures they are under, they have no choice.

But it is those low wages that keep the price of their goods low enough for the rich West buy in such huge quantities.

If exports begin to dry up, the jobs may ­disappear and what happens to the migrant workers then? Social unrest is a real danger.

And if wages rise and the effect is to create a much more educated, questioning population, there is another danger. The new middle class may well demand political reform that goes a long way beyond what the leadership is prepared to countenance.

The Communist Party is ­gambling that it can restore and maintain China’s greatness without ripping the country apart again.

There is no guarantee that it will succeed. In this new globalised, inter-dependent world what happens to the world’s biggest country ­matters to every single one of us.

If they lose their gamble none of us will escape the consequences.

Full Article

How about that for a thinly veiled threat? Who runs the world? Is it the US or the Crown? Here is a clear answer. Slave drivers of the AAA still at it, just a little more subtly than before. What a heartless article, telling China how it should keep its Communist police state, to control the uppity Chinese slaves. I don't like anyone who thinks it is their business telling the world what to do, especially in such an underhanded way as this.

Related - The High Street fashions made by 'slaves in British sweatshops'

The truth about illegal immigration is, they don't really 'steal' jobs, rather illegal immigration allows big business to undermine the local labourers. I am a supporter of organised labour (except when it's government employees organising, which is a whole different thing). With constant illegal immigration, there can be no organised labour to counterbalance the power of the fat cats.

Cameron U-Turns on Promise of Lisbon Treaty Referendum

He's a smooth liar.

Here is 'Dave' before the election:



Like Obama, his campaign slogan was 'change'. Har har. (And we didn't ask him what 'change' meant, just like the Americans didn't ask Obama. What do you want to change?)

Like Tony, he's another Common Purpose cardboard cut-out.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/208589/David-Cameron-U-turn-denies-Britain-EU-referendum

Pushing The New World Currency

Out of the chaos of the 'global currency war', cometh the order of a world currency

Is hard currency on its way out? Introducing the new virtual world currency.

When discussing reserve currency alternatives to the US dollar, conversation almost inevitably returns to the International Monetary Fund’s “synthetic reserve asset,” the Special Drawing Right (SDR)

...

The global “currency war” — as many are calling it — continues to heat up, with no obvious resolution in sight. While it wouldn’t be a simple, quick, or painless process to replace the US dollar as reserve currency, it seems inevitable that calls for just such action are bound to increase, especially if currently loose US monetary policy – including quantitative easing in particular — continues unabated.

Full Article

The UN's Crimes

The UN maintains its appearance as a cuddly peace loving organisation, but (especially in Africa where accountability is negligible) they are basically a front for NWO occupation and exploitation. Peace Keepers, oh really. Whose peace?

UN Peacekeepers Complicit in Sex Trade

The UN likes to watch genocide from a distance (like in Darfur). That isn't me saying there should be military intervention in Africa or anywhere, but I'm saying they go to these places with the intent of doing nothing but observing events and whatever other cartel-ish stuff they may do (drugs? oh come on, it's likely, our troops have been 'suspected' of running their own heroin rings in Afghanistan just a month or two ago). Any way you cut it, very morbid.


David Rockefeller just loves the Chinese.


Cecil Rhodes.
Makow: The Jewish Conspiracy Is British Imperialism

Remember that the sanctionmurder that was enforced against Iraq, which killed around a million Iraqis including 500000 children by the UN's own admission, was UN sanctions, approved by the UN, yes enforced by mostly US air power flying over Iraq 1990-2003, but I can't emphasise this enough.

It was the UN that killed a million Iraqis!

The UN is guilty of genocide on this alone!

An un-PC look at the UN

The UN headquartered at Rockefeller Plaza in New York. (Rockefeller being our friendly population control enthusiast of course.) The UN that takes orders from a certain someone, who isn't English, or is I suppose very English, depending on your paradigm and perspective. The UN that promotes Agenda 21, which you can think of as a global Highland Clearances, or a global Great Leap Forward. No matter, too many people know now, they're not going to get what they want I don't think.

What do you think? Will you be able to control the herd once people, and only about 20% of people are required, realise how badly they're being screwed and how deep the rabbit hole goes? For now you sit, perhaps a little towards the edge of your seat. Starting to squirm I wonder?

As usual the AAA supremacists run the show and just for clarity's sake not one of those As stands for American. 1776 was a huge crime against manifest destiny chosenness and Americans are being set up for major punishment as revenge for this sin against the Church of State. Or maybe they were punished already, but hey once is never enough when you're dealing with insubordinate rabble scum, right?

That man right there. Seize him! You can't have the serfs having weapons!

Currency War?

Create the crisis, offer the solution

This is from 2009.

"The real goal of the G-20 meetings: Creation of a new financial order based upon drastically new units of paper or fiat money to help wipe the world’s debt ledgers clean.

How? By systematically and progressively devaluing existing currencies, especially the U.S. dollar, and re-inflating ALL asset prices."

http://www.dailymarkets.com/economy/2009/04/02/the-g-20s-secret-debt-solution/

However here in 2010, the IMF is more like, "oh why are you all devaluing your currencies? Somebody make it stop! Maybe we will need to take over to stop all this chaos."

"The current situation is pretty ridiculous. The USA is inflating to bail out the banksters. Other countries are inflating to keep stable exchange rates with the US dollar. It's a worldwide hyperinflation race."

http://fskrealityguide.blogspot.com/2010/10/worldwide-hyperinflation-race.html

Iran Backs Down To Big Banks, Prevents WW3

Not a shot was fired.



h/t D&TT

About Ahmadinejad's 9/11 Comments...

As usual, all show and ceremony, propaganda and subversion

Many people are aware of the Hegelian process by which public opinion has been shaped throughout history. That is, if you control both the thesis and the antithesis, you can 'lead' the unsuspecting member of the public towards a predetermined synthesis, a controlled outcome.

This is most apparent in the political clash of left wing and right wing. To spot what the agenda, the planned synthesis, really is, you must look NOT at what they disagree on - but what they AGREE on.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a Iew. Like the English and Saudi royals are. Crypto of course.

So?

As usual, it's not what they disagree on, but what they agree on that counts. And so I give you...

http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/strenger-than-fiction/strenger-than-fiction-ahmadinejad-s-lesson-for-the-free-world-1.315522

Note that within a couple of paragraphs the article veers off into talking about how stupid Americans are?

And note that Ahmadinejad blames the US (aka Great Satan) for 9/11.

Anteye-Americanism.

The common bond breaching this Hegelian false conflict.

USA is being dismantled by design, and as goes America so goes the West. China is the new British Empire; America has been used, a necessary evil to TPTB, and is now being thrown away.

The perpetrators of 9/11 and 7/7 were MI6-Mossad-CIA, and that is a hierachial order IMO. The AAA, like I said. Saying America did 9/11 is like saying Britain did 7/7. Partly true, but kind of misleading.

There are a lot of paralells between Ahmadinejad and Hitler, in truth. The real Hitler I mean, not the fake pop culture six million version. Both are controlled opposition, Pied Pipers. Look at what Hitler brought upon the Germans. I just hope that Mahmoud doesn't provide pseudo-justification for similar atrocities against the Ayranian people, who by and large like the Germans just want to live free in their own country, as far as I an tell. (There is no persecution of Jews in Iran; if there was they would want to leave, but they don't. Although the first paragraph of this gave me a chuckle nonetheless. Oh I believe that wholeheartedly. Such poysecution.)

But then the Iraqis and Afghans, as many faults as they no doubt may have, also just wanted to be left alone, didn't they. Hell, people in Europe want nothing more than that, but they have the EU shafting them with their bureaucratic nonsense and free trade/open border policies.

So anyway, that's my take on Ahmadinejad. Provocateur, saboteur, trouble maker, small time tyrant. But hey at least he is no longer saying that 19 alcohol drinking, radical Muslim Saudis led by Donkey Kong Osama bin Laden, did 9/11. That is an even stupider and false thing to say.

Agenda 21 Dots

Social Engineering Bill In Senate Will Force You Into City

(Bigger Image)

Prince of Wales spreads eco-loon gospel on his amazing, biofuel-powered crazy train

India: land ownership is everything



Just remember, sustainable = without you.

http://www.vhemt.org/

May we live long, and they can die out.

Two Green Movements

Or, if you prefer, two strands within the green movement.

One is the movement of self sufficiency and independence. Of "getting off the grid" and "food security", "anti-corporatism" and "low impact living". A big threat to the centralised, interdependent control grid.

The other is of course the CO2penhagen Commies, or Watermelons if you prefer.

So has the latter sabotaged the former?

I almost feel like the Carbon Commies backed down a little too easily after Copenhagen/Climategate. This Lord Monckton shows up, oh I don't doubt his sincerity but remember all the world's a stage, and within literally a few months, the whole game has changed and the CO2phobes are running away with their tales between their legs and wads of cash stuffed inside their Fair Trade sandals.

Warum?

That's not like the usually audacious NWO to run like that. Now the old media is having to admit, well, we were shitting you all this time about boiling oceans, drowning polar bears et al. Not so blatantly but you get what I'm saying, they're backing off.

Is/was the green movement becoming a threat?

That's the beauty of these movements. Like the Tea Party. You try and control them, place your people at the helm, weed out the "extremist lunatic conspiracy theorists" (ie real deal anti NWO people), but they defragment and reform somewhere else; it must be like playing occultist whac-a-mole.

The genuine environmental movement should be, and frankly for the most part among ordinary people is, pro independence and self sovereignty, and utterly non Commie. Maybe, just maybe, they have been Tango'd.

And it takes two to tango.

A Game Where You Play As The Taliban...So What?

Oh no, not the Taliban...they're the bad guys!!! (wink wink, pot-kettle-black etc)

Yeah, those evil nasty peasants who have been fighting for the CIA, erm I mean for Islam, for thirty years.

Oh yes, they're bad. For instance, they were cutting off the opium trade, which was one of the reasons our criminal drug dealing overlords just had to get in there and reopen it.

"War on Drugs" in Afghanistan?

Yes they are bad. They do bad stuff. But they are not engaged in racketeering, warmongering and exploitation on a global basis, are they?

Zbig didn't get the message. Hey, Zbig, what are you doing fraternising with the enemy? Zbig knows what you don't, which is that having a sock puppet external enemy (i.e. a "Eurasia") keeps the general population from ousting the real, internal enemy.

For the record, I like videogames that show both sides to things. Heck, in CoD5 online you lined up as a Nazi and as a Commie. Who were the good guys there? Actually, the game's story pushes the NWO lie that the Commies liberated Europe from Nazi tyranny. What crap. It's not that simple now is it. Oh how the Russians and Germans were exploited. The Poles caught in the middle.

Control both sides and you control the outcome.

And here we are, back to the present.

At least the Taliban are fighting to defend their own land, which is more than can be said for us.

What do you think happened to the heroin after it was captured?

Sorry boys and girls, I support you but you're dying for naught but greed and exploitation. Some people may view that as an 'anti-troop' comment, but I'd rather they were told the truth than patronised with more 'support the troops' whitewashing brainwashing. If you really 'support the troops', stop contributing to the pernicious lies that end up getting them killed in deception-based 'freedom spreading' foreign adventures.

How better to end than with this.

War Is A Ritual, or Don't Bomb My Tax Haven Please

First let us take a look at the largely static trench systems of WW1. Here's a map of where the rabble obediently fought over land not big enough to bury the dead.

Notice anything unusual?

The machine gun/infantry predicament made it inevitable that the stalemate would ensue from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. Except one place where an invisible force field (kidding...or am I?) prevents the trenches from expanding into.

And don't buy their explanation that the Swiss were 'neutral'. Belgium was neutral, but the Germans marched right over them regardless in an attempt to outflank the French. So some are more neutral than others, hmm?

And again in WW2. When our chaps were taken POW, where did they run to? Home? That's a lot more difficult than running to der Schweitz, again neutral, and being flown home from this 'neutral' country!

If you were commanding ze Germans in WW2, and unlike Hitler you actually were trying to win, you surely would annex Switzerland immediately and cancel out its neutral status. It would be easy and it would solve a lot of problems, including the easy escape for POWs.

So what do we make of this situation? Two world human sacrifices, and this little neutral country - despite both times offering a strategic advantage to those who would violate its neutrality - remains unscathed (while others like Belgium and Holland are not so lucky).

Magick? Bank accounts?

Bank accounts.

But whose? Be Eye Ssss

"The BIS is also a frequent target of allegations by conspiracy theorists, many of whom portray it as a front organization through which a wealthy elite controls the world. Some argue that the bank has not helped matters through a culture of secretiveness"

Before any misunderstanding is made, I like Switzerland, especially their neutrality and their militia. But it must be understood that the finance oligarchs have done everything to undermine the neutrality and sovereignty of other nations; they only let places like der Schweitz exist because it suits them. Free trade + bailouts for the banksters, green economy adventure for us. Simple equation.

Did I mention that the Square Mile of London is a tax haven? Yet, it's such a 'good', 'sneaky' tax haven, it somehow does not appear on most lists of tax havens. (Take a look for yourself here)

"London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more "usual suspect” jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute."

Square Mile too secretive, says report

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the slaves
Britons never never never shall make waves
?

Elizardbeth II, Queen of the NWO, Ruler of the UN

Oh yeah, you think the bluebloods gave up all their power to 'democracy' do you? Bloodlines - either you have 'em or you don't. Sit on the throne or clean the throne...

Hail Caesar! Queen Gives Marching Orders To The UN
Rense.com

Regarding the queens speech to the United Nations, we were told by the British Mission to the United Nations that the queen "Will be taking a global perspective. She will touch on progress made since she was last here and challenges that remain."

For a woman who says she is not head of any country-only titular head of state of 16 countries including Australia, Canada and New Zealand and the nominal representative of 54 governments in the British Commonwealth, who is fooling who? Why should be the people of the world listen to a little old lady from Britain? The answer is because her hereditary demands it.

The visit by the queen, which was billed as low key-a five hour visit-was designed to get the global agenda of sustainable development and climate control back on track and to make a statement. Nothing the queen does is low key as every visit, and every word has a meaning and a goal for total control.

First let's take a look at the queen herself. According to Who Owns the World by Kevin Cahill, the queen is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land that equals one sixth of the earth's non-ocean surface. She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries and who owns countries that re not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies-like Norway, Belgium, and Denmark, where no such claim is made. The value of her holdings is approximately $33T, more than the estimated value of all of the earth's natural resources which is estimated to be $25T.

Secondly, the physical structure of the United Nations and its agenda represents the completion of the dream and aspirations of British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes to return the United States and the rest of the world back under British rule. He felt that "too little of the globe was British territoryand if we had retained Americathere would be millions more of English living."

In Rhode's 1877 will, it says

"the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British
Empire, the consolidation of the whole Empire, the inauguration of a system of colonial
Representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed
Members of the Empire," which may well ultimately be achieved, by the Roundtable which
"publicized the idea of and the name 'British Commonwealth of Nations.'"

The executors of Rhodes' six wills had concerns and fears about what kind of structure all of this should take. According to Dr. Carroll Quigley in his The Anglo-American Establishment published in 1981, they concluded that they would have to transform the British Empire into "a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League of Nations." The United Nations is the successor to the League of Nations and the Commonwealth is inside the U.N. In other words, we are there. The representatives to the UN should have greeted her, "Hail Caesar"!

Full Article

The general British indifference to the monarchy is because they are perceived to be nothing more than a relic or an antique, a tourist attraction that brings in more money from gullible foreigners - primarily Stockholm Syndrome royal loving Americans (I remember that from years ago when I visited Queenie's house in London, long before all this info reached me, all the American tourists who seemed to love the royalty surprised me) - than they cost us to pay for their luxury.

If it was even suspected by the average serf in the street that the royals had actual power, things might be very different.

Sooooo...hello! They do have real power! If looked upon from another angle, one might suspect them of being the highest leaders of the NWO...is Rothschild himself a Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sock puppet? Or to get higher than that are we going out of the human realm, oh boy you better believe that...

England is the (All Seeing) Eye of the Illuminist Storm

"When and where was the last battle fought on British soil?

Wednesday April 16, 1746. The Battle of Culloden. Fought between the Highlanders loyal to Bonnie Prince Charlie and BRITISH (that's important) Goverment troops. There was a small skirmish later on that year but it's not counted as a battle as such."

Or do we go all the way back to 1066 (btw do you think the usourious basterds would have accompanied William on his journey across the channel? Although we are strictly pre-'floating London' here, methinks it's likely):

The Norman conquest was a pivotal event in English history. It largely removed the native ruling class, replacing it with a foreign, French-speaking monarchy, aristocracy, and clerical hierarchy. This, in turn, brought about a transformation of the English language and the culture of England in a new era often referred to as Norman England.

By bringing England under the control of rulers originating in France, the Norman conquest linked the country more closely with continental Europe, lessened Scandinavian influence, and also set the stage for a rivalry with France that would continue intermittently for many centuries. It also had important consequences for the rest of the British Isles, paving the way for further Norman conquests in Wales and Ireland, and the extensive penetration of the aristocracy of Scotland by Norman and other French-speaking families, with the accompanying spread of continental institutions and cultural influences.
...
The Norman conquest is viewed as the last successful conquest of England"

So what gives? Why so peaceful, especially when all hell has been brought down on nearby nations again and again, not least during the 20th century. The eye of the storm, so to speak. All-seeing eye I guess...

Just to be clear I am specifically citing England here, not Britain and certainly not Ireland, given history. How can a country raise an empire that dominated the world, be involved centrally in the manipulated two world wars, and come off virtually unscathed? Magick is my answer, it's as good an explanation as any other.

"During the 12th century Venetian merchants make excellent use of the exclusive trading privilege granted them in the Byzantine empire, in 1082, for their help against the Normans. But their wealth and arrogance provoke profound hostility in Constantinople."

Why if that doesn't reek of British Israel City of London Corp...so the big boys move around a little. Venice, London, same con different place same bloodlines same Big Game. Have you ever noticed that Venetian sounds a lot like Phonecian? Perhaps a little languagemagic there. So when the time is right, alas it will be time to move operations elsewhere.

The places of peace amidst neverending conflict are where THEIR moneymagick operations are found...it's like they have an invisible force field protecting them from the surrounding shells and cannons...der Schweitz immediately comes to mind...

"If you want to know where the power lies, ask who you cannot criticise"
"If you want to know where the power lies, ask where does not get vaporised"

I am curious as to who did and did not get bombed during the London Blitz. I bet the British-MI-run Nazis didn't lay a finger on the trading houses of Gerald Celente's white shoe boys.

"The City, like many areas of London and other British cities, fell victim to large scale and highly destructive aerial bombing during World War II, in what is known as The Blitz. Whilst St Paul's Cathedral survived the onslaught, large swathes of the City did not. A major rebuilding programme therefore occurred in the decades following the war, in some parts (such as at the Barbican) dramatically altering the City's urban landscape. The destruction of the City's older historic fabric however allowed, and continues to allow, the construction of modern and larger-scale developments in parts of the City"

Unless, of course, they wanted to build new shiny moneymagick buildings but the pesky old ones and their owners were in the way...problem solved ;)

Yes, if THEY were thrown out of Britain they would simply move. I'm sure it's happened plenty of times before. But as of now it's misleading to say America controls Britain - it's another tail wagging the dog scenario. I do say old chap. The only solution is to break the spell THEY hold over us...which might not be possible due to the human condition being as it is - we make good slaves, don't we?

Large Areas of Arizona Now Part of Mexican Narco State

Kurt Nimmo/Infowars.com

If you live in southern Arizona now is the time to move if you can. Mexican drug runners and executioners armed with automatic weapons now control three counties stretching from the border to Phoenix.

“We are outgunned, we are out manned and we don’t have the resources here locally to fight this,” admitted Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu during on news conference last week in Casa Grande. “We are three counties deep. How is it that you see pictures like these, not American with semi and fully automatic rifles. How is that okay?”

A large area once used for family hiking and off road vehicles now has government signs warning residents of drug and human smugglers. Night vision cameras have photographed cartel members with military arms delivering drugs to vehicles along Highway 8, according to Borderland Beat.

Full Article

Make no mistake, those "Mexican" drug cartels are CIA-Mossad-MI6 run. It is no coincidence that the US and other Western militaries, filled with (mostly) decent ordinary people, are as far away as possible at this time when they will be needed. Bring 'em home ASAP. What, you think THEY won't use, or are using, Muslims in Europe the same way THEY are using Mexicans in the US? Destabilisation. Chaos. Then, Order...