Definitely recommend illchemist07's YouTube channel.
Thursday, 30 April 2009
TIME Sell Forced Vaccination Propaganda
About now would be a good opportunity to ask yourself, if you haven't already (especially if you're living in N America), what would you do if mandatory vaccinations were ordered? Take the shot? Avoid it somehow? Mass vaccination is a possibility, one which TIME is eager to sell as being good.
TIME: How to deal with swine flu: heeding the mistakes of 1976
In February 1976, an outbreak of swine flu struck Fort Dix Army base in New Jersey, killing a 19-year-old private and infecting hundreds of soldiers. Concerned that the U.S. was on the verge of a devastating epidemic, President Gerald Ford ordered a nationwide vaccination program at a cost of $135 million (some $500 million in today's money). Within weeks, reports surfaced of people developing Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing nerve disease that can be caused by the vaccine. By April, more than 30 people had died of the condition. Facing protests, federal officials abruptly canceled the program on Dec. 16. The epidemic failed to materialize.
Medical historians and epidemiologists say there are many differences between the relatively benign 1976 outbreak and the current strain of swine flu that is spreading across the globe. But they also say the decisions made in the wake of the '76 outbreak — and the public's response to them — provide a cautionary tale for public health officials, who may soon have to consider whether to institute draconian measures to combat the disease. (See pictures of the swine flu outbreak in Mexico.)
"I think 1976 provides an example of how not to handle a flu outbreak, but what's interesting is that it made a good deal of sense at the time," says Hugh Pennington, an emeritus professor of virology at Britain's University of Aberdeen. Pennington points out that conventional wisdom in 1976 held that the 1918 flu pandemic — which started among soldiers and eventually killed as many as 40 million — was the result of swine flu (scientists now know it was in fact a strain of bird flu). Despite modern advances in microbiology, today's health officials still make decisions in a "cloud of uncertainty," Pennington says. "At the moment, our understanding of the current outbreak is similarly limited. For example, we don't yet understand why people are dying in Mexico but not elsewhere." (See pictures of bird flu.)
In a quickly evolving situation, deciding what public health orders to make becomes as much an art as a science, and can often stir debate. On Monday, for example, health officials in Europe advised citizens to cancel all nonessential trips to Mexico and the U.S. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that advisory was too severe. Such decisions, difficult enough to make on purely medical grounds, become even more complicated when they involve politics. In 1976, President Ford's vaccine program came during an election cycle, and some historians believe he was swayed as much by a desire to display strong leadership as by the advice of health experts. (Read "Swine Flu: 5 Things You Need to Know About the Outbreak.")
Howard Markel, director of the Center for the History of Medicine at the University of Michigan and a historical consultant to the CDC on flu pandemics, says the most vexing decision facing health officials is when to institute mass vaccination programs. Vaccines carry risks of complications, leading to agonizing ethical dilemmas. In 1976, Ford offered indemnity to the vaccine manufacturers. But according to reports, President George W. Bush decided in 2002 not to administer a nationwide smallpox vaccination program — despite Vice President Dick Cheney's belief that doing so was a prudent counterterrorism step — because it could have resulted in dozens of deaths (the smallpox vaccine kills between 1 and 2 people per million people inoculated).
Markel says the political climate in the U.S. is much less combustible today than in the post-Watergate era, when Ford faced a skeptical public. Even so, he says, citizens still need to trust that the government is working for the greater good. He says, "The good news is that our surveillance, methodology and public health professionals have never been better. But we are human and mistakes may be made — as happened with the 1976 swine flu affair — and we may jump the gun in the hope of preserving life. The current outbreak is a situation in flux. The American public has to be forgiving and patient and do [their] part too."
No. Now may I suggest next week's TIME new world order-approved message:
"How to deal with patriots: heeding the mistakes of 1776". I'd like to read that article, actually.
TIME: How to deal with swine flu: heeding the mistakes of 1976
In February 1976, an outbreak of swine flu struck Fort Dix Army base in New Jersey, killing a 19-year-old private and infecting hundreds of soldiers. Concerned that the U.S. was on the verge of a devastating epidemic, President Gerald Ford ordered a nationwide vaccination program at a cost of $135 million (some $500 million in today's money). Within weeks, reports surfaced of people developing Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing nerve disease that can be caused by the vaccine. By April, more than 30 people had died of the condition. Facing protests, federal officials abruptly canceled the program on Dec. 16. The epidemic failed to materialize.
Medical historians and epidemiologists say there are many differences between the relatively benign 1976 outbreak and the current strain of swine flu that is spreading across the globe. But they also say the decisions made in the wake of the '76 outbreak — and the public's response to them — provide a cautionary tale for public health officials, who may soon have to consider whether to institute draconian measures to combat the disease. (See pictures of the swine flu outbreak in Mexico.)
"I think 1976 provides an example of how not to handle a flu outbreak, but what's interesting is that it made a good deal of sense at the time," says Hugh Pennington, an emeritus professor of virology at Britain's University of Aberdeen. Pennington points out that conventional wisdom in 1976 held that the 1918 flu pandemic — which started among soldiers and eventually killed as many as 40 million — was the result of swine flu (scientists now know it was in fact a strain of bird flu). Despite modern advances in microbiology, today's health officials still make decisions in a "cloud of uncertainty," Pennington says. "At the moment, our understanding of the current outbreak is similarly limited. For example, we don't yet understand why people are dying in Mexico but not elsewhere." (See pictures of bird flu.)
In a quickly evolving situation, deciding what public health orders to make becomes as much an art as a science, and can often stir debate. On Monday, for example, health officials in Europe advised citizens to cancel all nonessential trips to Mexico and the U.S. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that advisory was too severe. Such decisions, difficult enough to make on purely medical grounds, become even more complicated when they involve politics. In 1976, President Ford's vaccine program came during an election cycle, and some historians believe he was swayed as much by a desire to display strong leadership as by the advice of health experts. (Read "Swine Flu: 5 Things You Need to Know About the Outbreak.")
Howard Markel, director of the Center for the History of Medicine at the University of Michigan and a historical consultant to the CDC on flu pandemics, says the most vexing decision facing health officials is when to institute mass vaccination programs. Vaccines carry risks of complications, leading to agonizing ethical dilemmas. In 1976, Ford offered indemnity to the vaccine manufacturers. But according to reports, President George W. Bush decided in 2002 not to administer a nationwide smallpox vaccination program — despite Vice President Dick Cheney's belief that doing so was a prudent counterterrorism step — because it could have resulted in dozens of deaths (the smallpox vaccine kills between 1 and 2 people per million people inoculated).
Markel says the political climate in the U.S. is much less combustible today than in the post-Watergate era, when Ford faced a skeptical public. Even so, he says, citizens still need to trust that the government is working for the greater good. He says, "The good news is that our surveillance, methodology and public health professionals have never been better. But we are human and mistakes may be made — as happened with the 1976 swine flu affair — and we may jump the gun in the hope of preserving life. The current outbreak is a situation in flux. The American public has to be forgiving and patient and do [their] part too."
No. Now may I suggest next week's TIME new world order-approved message:
"How to deal with patriots: heeding the mistakes of 1776". I'd like to read that article, actually.
Wednesday, 29 April 2009
Peter Lavelle: The New World Order is Good
Unbelieveable in a sense, but this kind of utopian shilling is unfortunately routine, for example from Gideon Rachman.
Russia Today: Peter Lavelle - The great paradigm shift
Over the past week, the makings of the new world order crossed paths with the dying ancien regime. The G20 gave us a glimpse of what is coming into being - a truly multilateral global order - and NATO demonstrated on its 60th anniversary that is no longer up to the job of ensuring global security. The world as we have known it is coming to an end before our very eyes - and this is for the better.
The G20 meeting was a micromanaged success. Participants wisely signed up to a number of initial compromises to deal with the global financial crisis. Much more needs to be done, but there is at growing awareness that the financial order called the "Washington consensus" has run its course.
The liberal Anglo-Saxon economic philosophy that has ruled the world for over 60 years is slowly, but very surely being put to rest. In London, the Americans and the British fought to keep government and international regulation of financial markets off the agenda. They failed. The writing is on the wall - unfettered Western-style capitalism is on the wane. The real winners in London were China, what is called "Old Europe," and actually most of the world.
Government fiscal injections - and in the case of the U.S. simply printing money - is not the best way out of the slump. The world doesn't really need financial stimulus packages; it needs a major overhaul of how financial markets are run. This means the reckless, irresponsible and greedy bankers and financiers should no longer be able to call the shots.
We will see the start of a process that will finally democratise the international financial system, which of course will benefit the many over the traditional few in the West. Expect to see the interests and demands of the BRIC countries and others to play stronger leadership roles on the international stage. This process won't happen overnight, but it has started and there is no turning back.
Two other issues that came out of the final G20 communiqué are noteworthy, but largely misunderstood or purposely underplayed: individual countries' nationalisation of their banking sectors and a real attempt to start and manage globalisation.
Currently, nationalising banks may be one of the pillars of casting the new world financial and economic order. For some, this is a radical step and a sign of embracing "socialism."
Well, old Cold War taboos like this do not belong in the present or the future. Privately owned and outrageously de-regulated banking got us all in this mess and for a certain interval individual states and international bodies should oversee how our money is used (to make sure it is not abused) and invested. How long is a "certain interval?"
This is unclear at this point. However, until there are assurances the irresponsibility and the greed of the few have been mandated out of this banking process, and states and internationally transparent bodies should be given a wide berth to run the global financial system.
The global financial crisis has also - albeit unexpectedly - created an opening to manage globalisation. Under globalisation, states have lost control of exports, production, and labour.
This was because the financial system and its regulation were essentially privatised to serve the interests of the few. Once money flows are controlled and made more transparent, there is some hope that globalisation can be harnessed for the benefit of all; particularly the world's poorest and least able to protect themselves.
The current international security arrangement is on its last legs. NATO's 60th birthday was an embarrassment - the dust and growing mould of a dying alliance was easy to spot.
Alliance members, including U.S. President Barack Obama, made a big deal of inducting Albania and Croatia into NATO.
Hello! Reality check: how in the world can Albania and Croatia help fulfil NATO's greatest challenge of stabilising Afghanistan?
What does NATO stand for? There is no clear answer to this question. NATO countries supported Obama's "surge" agenda, but at the same time they wished the U.S. the best without signing up to their own troops to fight the cause. So much for the coalition of the willing.
NATO has grudgingly reengaged Russia after its very critical stance over the Georgia conflict. But it also understands that any positive movement in Afghanistan (and Pakistan) cannot happen without Russia's cooperation. Russia has its security interests when it comes to the post-Soviet space, but at the same time is in agreement that something has to be done to stabilise these two countries. NATO looks weak and without direction - since the end of the Cold War, NATO can't figure out what it wants to be.
NATO came into being in a different era with a very specific mission: defend Western Europe and the North Atlantic space against Soviet aggression. It achieved this goal. Since 1991, the alliance has rendered itself as unhelpful and basically useless. NATO should accept the paradigm shift and transform itself into something new and useful, which should include Russia as a real and trusted partner.
The era of using other people's money for profit is coming to a close. And the time of security for the few at the expense of others is almost over. These are the basics of the paradigm shift. Getting used to this won't be easy, but at the end of the day both will create a fairer world order.
If you read all that and didn't feel mad at least once, then you probably aren't human. It's a patronising diatribe from an elitist coward. Total bs, capitalism didn't cause the crisis, it's a classic problem-reaction-solution trick. Other than that it's just serving up Kool-Aid for the (Inter)national Socialists and their power fantasy of World Government.
Make no mistake, they are merciless wolves behind the sheep's clothing of communitarianism! They funded and supported some of the most savage regimes in history, and they have all options at their disposal in their quest for power and population reduction by 90+ per cent. They must, can, and will be stopped. Don't lie down in denial, now isn't the time for that; the hour is late.
Swine Flu Crisis: WHO Level 5 Declared
What do I mean 'crisis'? The flu has only killed a few hundred people, at most. No, what I mean is martial law. Forced vaccinations. Quarantines. And, by proxy, gun confiscations, detainment camps and all else that martial law entails. That is the worst case scenario here, and it's no joke.
Times - Pandemic alert raised to Level 5
The World Health Organisation tonight raised the pandemic alert level to five out of six after the continued spread of swine flu world wide.
Margaret Chan, the organisation's director-general, said tonight: "I have decided to raise the current level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 4 to phase 5.
What does Level 5 mean? It means that all emergency procedures for pandemic (ie martial law, quarantines, forced vaccinations) are encouraged to be implemented. In other words, martial law in America can be declared with this as justification at any point. I expressly stress America because disarming their free populace in my opinion has been one of the central points of the NWO agenda from the beginning. Such a declaration would classify as an emergency, and activate emergency US Presidential dictatorial power as defined by Bush's 2006 executive order.
I believe the key obstacle the NWO has to overcome is the 100 million gun owners of the United States. They want everyone disarmed, docile, dehumanised, like in China. Really it's only America and a handful of other countries that have large enough armed populations to present a real problem to those who would enslave us. They want martial law so they can set the DHS and the militarised police upon the gun owners. I think - and hope - this will fail, if it happens.
If they pull the trigger on martial law in America, I dread for the resulting blood in the streets as a free people are once again given the non-choice of submission or resistance. Some people, probably because of the TV, can't see this coming...maybe not this time of course, but in six months, or two years or five years, it will happen at some point. I commend all those who care for freedom and those who are showing courage in the face of unspeakable tyranny.
"May you live in interesting times" - Chinese proverb
Times - Pandemic alert raised to Level 5
The World Health Organisation tonight raised the pandemic alert level to five out of six after the continued spread of swine flu world wide.
Margaret Chan, the organisation's director-general, said tonight: "I have decided to raise the current level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 4 to phase 5.
What does Level 5 mean? It means that all emergency procedures for pandemic (ie martial law, quarantines, forced vaccinations) are encouraged to be implemented. In other words, martial law in America can be declared with this as justification at any point. I expressly stress America because disarming their free populace in my opinion has been one of the central points of the NWO agenda from the beginning. Such a declaration would classify as an emergency, and activate emergency US Presidential dictatorial power as defined by Bush's 2006 executive order.
I believe the key obstacle the NWO has to overcome is the 100 million gun owners of the United States. They want everyone disarmed, docile, dehumanised, like in China. Really it's only America and a handful of other countries that have large enough armed populations to present a real problem to those who would enslave us. They want martial law so they can set the DHS and the militarised police upon the gun owners. I think - and hope - this will fail, if it happens.
If they pull the trigger on martial law in America, I dread for the resulting blood in the streets as a free people are once again given the non-choice of submission or resistance. Some people, probably because of the TV, can't see this coming...maybe not this time of course, but in six months, or two years or five years, it will happen at some point. I commend all those who care for freedom and those who are showing courage in the face of unspeakable tyranny.
"May you live in interesting times" - Chinese proverb
No Coal, No Carbon...for the Earth, Comrades!
Club of Rome 1991 - "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
BBC: 'Safe' climate means 'no to coal'
About three-quarters of the world's fossil fuel reserves must be left unused if society is to avoid dangerous climate change, scientists warn.
More than 100 nations support the goal of keeping temperature rise below 2C.
But the scientists say that without major curbs on fossil fuel use, 2C will probably be reached by 2050.
Writing in Nature, they say politicians should focus on limiting humanity's total output of CO2 rather than setting a "safe" level for annual emissions.
The UN climate process focuses on stabilising annual emissions at a level that would avoid major climate impacts...
Obama to regulate 'pollutant' CO2 [how is it a pollutant when plants breathe it and it's part of the life cycle?]
The US government is to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, having decided that it and five other greenhouse gases may endanger human health and well-being.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the move following a review of the scientific evidence.
The decision marks a major change from the Bush presidency, when the EPA argued it could not regulate CO2 because the gas was not a pollutant.
Developing countries have asked for the US to show leadership on climate. Many are not prepared to curtail their own emissions without firm indications that the US is willing to make significant reductions.
If you read all that MSM sludge, you can decide whether carbon dioxide - that you are breathing out right now - is a pollutant, or whether the above propaganda is a pollutant of the mind.
BBC: 'Safe' climate means 'no to coal'
About three-quarters of the world's fossil fuel reserves must be left unused if society is to avoid dangerous climate change, scientists warn.
More than 100 nations support the goal of keeping temperature rise below 2C.
But the scientists say that without major curbs on fossil fuel use, 2C will probably be reached by 2050.
Writing in Nature, they say politicians should focus on limiting humanity's total output of CO2 rather than setting a "safe" level for annual emissions.
The UN climate process focuses on stabilising annual emissions at a level that would avoid major climate impacts...
Obama to regulate 'pollutant' CO2 [how is it a pollutant when plants breathe it and it's part of the life cycle?]
The US government is to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, having decided that it and five other greenhouse gases may endanger human health and well-being.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the move following a review of the scientific evidence.
The decision marks a major change from the Bush presidency, when the EPA argued it could not regulate CO2 because the gas was not a pollutant.
Developing countries have asked for the US to show leadership on climate. Many are not prepared to curtail their own emissions without firm indications that the US is willing to make significant reductions.
If you read all that MSM sludge, you can decide whether carbon dioxide - that you are breathing out right now - is a pollutant, or whether the above propaganda is a pollutant of the mind.
Jim Shaw, former Freemason, 33rd Degree
Interesting testimony about why he left Freemasonry. Christians, and all people for that matter, might be interested to hear about what apparently goes on at the top levels of Freemasonry.
A Freemason's 33rd Degree Initiation
In the interests of space, I quote the really weird stuff here:
When my turn came I was ushered into the office and seated. The very first question I was asked was, "Of what religion are you?" Not long before this I would have answered with something like, "I believe the Ancient Mysteries, the 'Old Religion,' and I believe in reincarnation." However, without thinking at all about how to answer, I found myself saying, "I am a Christian."
After they sent me back out I sat down and thought about it. When the next man came out, I asked him, "Did they ask you if you are a Christian?" He said, "Yes, they did."
"What did you tell them?" I asked, and he replied, "I told them 'Hell no, and I never intend to be!'"
Then he said a strange thing to me, "They said I'm going higher," and he left through a different door, looking pleased.
------
One of the Conductors then handed the "candidate" a human skull, upside down, with wine in it. "May this wine I now drink become a deadly poison to me, as the Hemlock juice drunk by Socrates, should I ever knowingly or willfully violate the same" (the oath).
------
There were some extremely prominent men there that day, including a Scandinavian King, two former presidents of the United States, an internationally prominent evangelist, two other internationally prominent clergymen, and a very high official of the federal government, the one who actually presented me with the certificate of the 33rd Degree.
-------
Dressed in long, black, hooded robes, we marched in, single file, with only our faces partly showing, and took our seats.
There was something very tomb-like about the setting. The silence was broken only by the organ, playing mournfully in the background, and there was no light except for the little that came through the windows. After the opening prayer (from which the name of Jesus Christ was conspicuously excluded), I stood and opened the service.
As I had done so many times before, I said, "We meet this day to commemorate the death of our 'Most Wise and Perfect Master,' not as inspired or divine, for this is not for us to decide, but as at least the greatest of the apostles of mankind."
As I spoke these words that I had spoken so many times before, I had a strange and powerful experience. It was as if I were standing apart, listening to myself as I spoke, and the words echoed deep within me, shouting their significance. They were the same words I had spoken so many times before, but had meaning for me now. They made me sick, literally ill, and I stopped.
The realization of what I had just said grew within me like the rising of a crescendo. I had just called Jesus an "apostle of mankind" who was neither inspired nor divine! There was a silent pause that seemed to last a very long time as I struggled with a sick smothering within.
------
After this we took our places at the table shaped like a cross and sat down. The setting was dark, our long, sweeping robes were solid black, our faces nearly concealed in the hoods, and the mood was one of heavy gloom. The Christ-less prayers and the hymns we sang fit right in. The one word that would describe the entire event would be "black." It was, indeed, a Black Communion - a strange Black Mass.
------
Then I asked the officers to extinguish the candles in the large Menorah. One by one they rose, walked to the center of the room, extinguished a selected candle and left the room.
Finally, with only the center candle still burning, I arose, walked sadly to the Menorah and extinguished the last candle - the candle representing the life of Jesus, our "Most Wise and Perfect Master." We had dramatized and commemorated the snuffing out of the life of Jesus, without once mentioning his name, and the scene ended with the room in deep silent darkness. I walked out of the room, leaving only the darkness and the stillness of death.
A Freemason's 33rd Degree Initiation
In the interests of space, I quote the really weird stuff here:
When my turn came I was ushered into the office and seated. The very first question I was asked was, "Of what religion are you?" Not long before this I would have answered with something like, "I believe the Ancient Mysteries, the 'Old Religion,' and I believe in reincarnation." However, without thinking at all about how to answer, I found myself saying, "I am a Christian."
After they sent me back out I sat down and thought about it. When the next man came out, I asked him, "Did they ask you if you are a Christian?" He said, "Yes, they did."
"What did you tell them?" I asked, and he replied, "I told them 'Hell no, and I never intend to be!'"
Then he said a strange thing to me, "They said I'm going higher," and he left through a different door, looking pleased.
------
One of the Conductors then handed the "candidate" a human skull, upside down, with wine in it. "May this wine I now drink become a deadly poison to me, as the Hemlock juice drunk by Socrates, should I ever knowingly or willfully violate the same" (the oath).
------
There were some extremely prominent men there that day, including a Scandinavian King, two former presidents of the United States, an internationally prominent evangelist, two other internationally prominent clergymen, and a very high official of the federal government, the one who actually presented me with the certificate of the 33rd Degree.
-------
Dressed in long, black, hooded robes, we marched in, single file, with only our faces partly showing, and took our seats.
There was something very tomb-like about the setting. The silence was broken only by the organ, playing mournfully in the background, and there was no light except for the little that came through the windows. After the opening prayer (from which the name of Jesus Christ was conspicuously excluded), I stood and opened the service.
As I had done so many times before, I said, "We meet this day to commemorate the death of our 'Most Wise and Perfect Master,' not as inspired or divine, for this is not for us to decide, but as at least the greatest of the apostles of mankind."
As I spoke these words that I had spoken so many times before, I had a strange and powerful experience. It was as if I were standing apart, listening to myself as I spoke, and the words echoed deep within me, shouting their significance. They were the same words I had spoken so many times before, but had meaning for me now. They made me sick, literally ill, and I stopped.
The realization of what I had just said grew within me like the rising of a crescendo. I had just called Jesus an "apostle of mankind" who was neither inspired nor divine! There was a silent pause that seemed to last a very long time as I struggled with a sick smothering within.
------
After this we took our places at the table shaped like a cross and sat down. The setting was dark, our long, sweeping robes were solid black, our faces nearly concealed in the hoods, and the mood was one of heavy gloom. The Christ-less prayers and the hymns we sang fit right in. The one word that would describe the entire event would be "black." It was, indeed, a Black Communion - a strange Black Mass.
------
Then I asked the officers to extinguish the candles in the large Menorah. One by one they rose, walked to the center of the room, extinguished a selected candle and left the room.
Finally, with only the center candle still burning, I arose, walked sadly to the Menorah and extinguished the last candle - the candle representing the life of Jesus, our "Most Wise and Perfect Master." We had dramatized and commemorated the snuffing out of the life of Jesus, without once mentioning his name, and the scene ended with the room in deep silent darkness. I walked out of the room, leaving only the darkness and the stillness of death.
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
Ordo ab Chao: Swine Flu Edition
The so-called 'swine flu' (actually it's a mix of human, swine, and avian flu) is almost certainly a bioweapon or a 'designer virus'. Fourwinds10.com is reporting the outbreak came from a US Army bioweapons lab, supposedly from an inside source - I'm sure more details about the validity of that will come out in time.
(Ordo ab Chao = Order out of Chaos)
Anyway, the outbreak seems to be going well. Foreigners are leaving Mexico, taking the virus with them; the border with America is wide open; and to cap it all off, the company responsible for creating a vaccine for the flu (which I personally won't be taking no matter how bad it gets) is Baxter! If you don't know why that's a problem, you should take a look here.
The WHO is, according to Press TV, going to level 5 (yesterday it upgraded to level 4), which would implement all emergency procedures for a full scale pandemic.
FEMA have been doing flu drills recently, if it's of any significance.
For some detailed, informed analysis on the swine flu outbreak, look no further than Steve Quayle on Monday's Alex Jones Show. Some hardcore dot connecting right there.
My 2c on this - not sure it's the pandemic, it doesn't seem lethal enough, but it's early in the day for this outbreak. Looks like another warm-up for the real thing, but I could be wrong of course. Either that or it's an attempt at setting off a global pandemic that hasn't worked yet.
Don't doubt for a second that a mass pandemic is what the elites want. Then again, if you're awake, and you understand what I mean when I use the word awake, you'll already know.
If not, I recommend Endgame. It's very relevant right now.
(Ordo ab Chao = Order out of Chaos)
Anyway, the outbreak seems to be going well. Foreigners are leaving Mexico, taking the virus with them; the border with America is wide open; and to cap it all off, the company responsible for creating a vaccine for the flu (which I personally won't be taking no matter how bad it gets) is Baxter! If you don't know why that's a problem, you should take a look here.
The WHO is, according to Press TV, going to level 5 (yesterday it upgraded to level 4), which would implement all emergency procedures for a full scale pandemic.
FEMA have been doing flu drills recently, if it's of any significance.
For some detailed, informed analysis on the swine flu outbreak, look no further than Steve Quayle on Monday's Alex Jones Show. Some hardcore dot connecting right there.
My 2c on this - not sure it's the pandemic, it doesn't seem lethal enough, but it's early in the day for this outbreak. Looks like another warm-up for the real thing, but I could be wrong of course. Either that or it's an attempt at setting off a global pandemic that hasn't worked yet.
Don't doubt for a second that a mass pandemic is what the elites want. Then again, if you're awake, and you understand what I mean when I use the word awake, you'll already know.
If not, I recommend Endgame. It's very relevant right now.
Monday, 27 April 2009
New World Order Card Game from 1995
Illuminati: New World Order is a game made over a decade ago by Steve Jackson Games.
His property was raided by the secret service of all people in 1990 (see here.) Why would they do that, hmm? Also, just see for yourself some of the events depicted in the card game and decide whether they are relevant to the last ten years. Or possibly the next ten years for that matter. Or, as in the case of 'epidemic', we might even be witnessing the start of a flu pandemic right now in Mexico.
The game, as it is described by its maker, is a "tongue in cheek" satire of conspiracies. However, especially given the secret service's intrest in Jackson (as well as the obvious ingame references to terror attacks, chemtrails, pandemics and population reduction) you can't help but wonder how much he knew back in the 90s...the SJ story sounds like some Hollywood plot, but it's very real!
Read a more detailed analysis of what is written on some of the game's cards here - hard to deny there is more than just coincidence to this. Uncanny.
It should be noted that I am not too concerned with the whole UFO thing (as shown in the video above), just because it's all too convenient, and because a staged alien event (like what is allegedly planned in Operation Bluebeam) plays into the hands of the globalists, so we might willingly unite as a planet against a common enemy, whether real or imagined.
Anyway, common sense dictates that it is very unlikely to be a coincidence that Jackson's game contained events similar to 9/11, for example, but six years before. Interesting stuff.
His property was raided by the secret service of all people in 1990 (see here.) Why would they do that, hmm? Also, just see for yourself some of the events depicted in the card game and decide whether they are relevant to the last ten years. Or possibly the next ten years for that matter. Or, as in the case of 'epidemic', we might even be witnessing the start of a flu pandemic right now in Mexico.
The game, as it is described by its maker, is a "tongue in cheek" satire of conspiracies. However, especially given the secret service's intrest in Jackson (as well as the obvious ingame references to terror attacks, chemtrails, pandemics and population reduction) you can't help but wonder how much he knew back in the 90s...the SJ story sounds like some Hollywood plot, but it's very real!
Read a more detailed analysis of what is written on some of the game's cards here - hard to deny there is more than just coincidence to this. Uncanny.
It should be noted that I am not too concerned with the whole UFO thing (as shown in the video above), just because it's all too convenient, and because a staged alien event (like what is allegedly planned in Operation Bluebeam) plays into the hands of the globalists, so we might willingly unite as a planet against a common enemy, whether real or imagined.
Anyway, common sense dictates that it is very unlikely to be a coincidence that Jackson's game contained events similar to 9/11, for example, but six years before. Interesting stuff.
Sunday, 26 April 2009
UK's new saviour, David Cameron
It's hardly Obama-style, but the media hype behind the almost inevitable Conservative election win in 2010 is already gearing up. We're all going to be rescued!
Telegraph - David Cameron to crack down on public sector pay
In the speech he named several public-sector employees who he indicated are overpaid. Ed Richards, the chief executive of Ofcom earns £400,000 and British Waterways Board bosses Robin Evans, Nigel Johnson, James Froomberg and Phillip Ridal, have combined salaries of £900,000 - enough to employ 30 nurses.
He said a Conservative Government will "out" quangocrats and mandarins who have been "getting rich at the taxpayer's expense" by publishing details of all public sector salaries over £150,000.
Mr Cameron said that means-tested tax credits for people earning over £50,000 would be scrapped to save taxpayers' money.
"It is not easy, or popular, for governments to take money away from people," the Conservative leader said. "With a Conservative government, tax credits will be there to help make society fairer, not the state bigger.
"And we must apply the same discipline throughout government. That means making sure that public sector pay and pensions reflect the realities of the economic situation.
"Let me make it clear to everyone who works in the public sector: we will honour existing pay deals, including any three year pay deals. But many of them end next year.
"And this is the deal we'll be offering you then: We will help you by getting rid of the central direction and bureaucracy that undermines your professional autonomy and morale. And in exchange we will ask for your help in solving Labour's Debt Crisis by keeping the cost of public sector pay only as high as the country can responsibly afford."
The Conservative leader also indicated that the Conservatives may freeze public spending in future. He has previously only said that the party would undercut Labour's spending plans.
"We said they [Labour] should reduce their spending plans back in 2008," he said. "And now we're saying they should abandon their irresponsible plan to spend more in 2010. Controlling public spending and delivering more for less must start right now.
"We've made it clear that a Conservative government would spend less than Labour. We're not frightened of their idiotic ritual chants about 'cuts'. Everybody knows that Labour's debt crisis means public spending cuts. And instead of putting them off, Labour should be making them today."
Philip Hammond, a shadow Treasury minister, indicated that a Conservative Government would seek to reintroduce Gordon Brown's "golden rule" – to keep Government borrowing below 40 percent of national economic output. Under Labour's plans, borrowing is forecast to rise to 79 percent of output and is not forecast to fall below the 40 percent level until 2032.
Mr Cameron called for a "massive culture change at every level of government". He said he wanted to replace "Labour's spendaholic government with a new government of thrift."
"With a Conservative government, if ministers want to impress the boss, they'll have to make their budgets smaller, not bigger," he said. "On my watch it will be simple: if you do more for less you get promoted. If you do less for more, you get sacked.
"If we'd had this approach over the last twelve years, I don't suppose there'd be a single Labour minister left."
The Conservative leader also warned that he was likely to have to increase taxes to pay-off soaring levels of Government debt.
"Fifteen years ago, I was in the Treasury as we had to deal with public finances that had got out of control; debt that had got too high," he said. "We had to put up taxes, and I hate it. But it was the right thing to do and that lesson has stayed with me. That's why I'm a fiscal conservative."
The tone is familiar. Here are these great well-meaning people going up against the establishment...only problem is that, like the Obama phenomenon, the very people expected to fight the establishment are owned by the establishment! I would recommend voting outside of the big three parties, don't let the "BNP are going to get in" fearmongering keep you voting Labour or whoever - it's a ploy to discredit those who vote for smaller parties.
Telegraph - David Cameron to crack down on public sector pay
In the speech he named several public-sector employees who he indicated are overpaid. Ed Richards, the chief executive of Ofcom earns £400,000 and British Waterways Board bosses Robin Evans, Nigel Johnson, James Froomberg and Phillip Ridal, have combined salaries of £900,000 - enough to employ 30 nurses.
He said a Conservative Government will "out" quangocrats and mandarins who have been "getting rich at the taxpayer's expense" by publishing details of all public sector salaries over £150,000.
Mr Cameron said that means-tested tax credits for people earning over £50,000 would be scrapped to save taxpayers' money.
"It is not easy, or popular, for governments to take money away from people," the Conservative leader said. "With a Conservative government, tax credits will be there to help make society fairer, not the state bigger.
"And we must apply the same discipline throughout government. That means making sure that public sector pay and pensions reflect the realities of the economic situation.
"Let me make it clear to everyone who works in the public sector: we will honour existing pay deals, including any three year pay deals. But many of them end next year.
"And this is the deal we'll be offering you then: We will help you by getting rid of the central direction and bureaucracy that undermines your professional autonomy and morale. And in exchange we will ask for your help in solving Labour's Debt Crisis by keeping the cost of public sector pay only as high as the country can responsibly afford."
The Conservative leader also indicated that the Conservatives may freeze public spending in future. He has previously only said that the party would undercut Labour's spending plans.
"We said they [Labour] should reduce their spending plans back in 2008," he said. "And now we're saying they should abandon their irresponsible plan to spend more in 2010. Controlling public spending and delivering more for less must start right now.
"We've made it clear that a Conservative government would spend less than Labour. We're not frightened of their idiotic ritual chants about 'cuts'. Everybody knows that Labour's debt crisis means public spending cuts. And instead of putting them off, Labour should be making them today."
Philip Hammond, a shadow Treasury minister, indicated that a Conservative Government would seek to reintroduce Gordon Brown's "golden rule" – to keep Government borrowing below 40 percent of national economic output. Under Labour's plans, borrowing is forecast to rise to 79 percent of output and is not forecast to fall below the 40 percent level until 2032.
Mr Cameron called for a "massive culture change at every level of government". He said he wanted to replace "Labour's spendaholic government with a new government of thrift."
"With a Conservative government, if ministers want to impress the boss, they'll have to make their budgets smaller, not bigger," he said. "On my watch it will be simple: if you do more for less you get promoted. If you do less for more, you get sacked.
"If we'd had this approach over the last twelve years, I don't suppose there'd be a single Labour minister left."
The Conservative leader also warned that he was likely to have to increase taxes to pay-off soaring levels of Government debt.
"Fifteen years ago, I was in the Treasury as we had to deal with public finances that had got out of control; debt that had got too high," he said. "We had to put up taxes, and I hate it. But it was the right thing to do and that lesson has stayed with me. That's why I'm a fiscal conservative."
The tone is familiar. Here are these great well-meaning people going up against the establishment...only problem is that, like the Obama phenomenon, the very people expected to fight the establishment are owned by the establishment! I would recommend voting outside of the big three parties, don't let the "BNP are going to get in" fearmongering keep you voting Labour or whoever - it's a ploy to discredit those who vote for smaller parties.
Daily Kos wants to End the Fed!
This is how far the idea of freedom has spread...
I Killed the Bank
When asked what his greatest accomplishment had been during his two terms as President, Andrew Jackson replied "I killed the Bank." He was talking about the "Second Bank of the United States", which was our country's second central bank.
So, why was Jackson so passionate about terminating the central bank? And why did he believe that central banks were so insidious? And why should you care?
A couple of reasons you might be interested to know about what motivated Jackson:
Though Jackson ended the central bank, it was re-created in 1913 under a new innocuous-sounding name "The Federal Reserve", which is still with us today.
Also, it's interesting to note that Andrew Jackson's populist message relating to banking helped to launch the Democratic party...
At the end of the article there is a poll:
Should we end the Federal Reserve?
Yes - 94% (455)
No - 3% (17)
Other - 1% (9)
There's 'hope' yet for the cult of Socialists!
I Killed the Bank
When asked what his greatest accomplishment had been during his two terms as President, Andrew Jackson replied "I killed the Bank." He was talking about the "Second Bank of the United States", which was our country's second central bank.
So, why was Jackson so passionate about terminating the central bank? And why did he believe that central banks were so insidious? And why should you care?
A couple of reasons you might be interested to know about what motivated Jackson:
Though Jackson ended the central bank, it was re-created in 1913 under a new innocuous-sounding name "The Federal Reserve", which is still with us today.
Also, it's interesting to note that Andrew Jackson's populist message relating to banking helped to launch the Democratic party...
At the end of the article there is a poll:
Should we end the Federal Reserve?
Yes - 94% (455)
No - 3% (17)
Other - 1% (9)
There's 'hope' yet for the cult of Socialists!
Defending David Icke: Not a "far-right" neo-Nazi
Note: Responding to a post at Alex Constantine's Blacklist here. Further information here.
Boston Top News Examiner article attacking David Icke and Infowars
I'd better get it out of the way that I do not agree with everything stated by David Icke; I'm not particularly concerned by the possibility that the global elite are reptillians and I don't believe in the New Age/spiritual stuff. But hey, to each his own.
There exists, in my view, a false smear that Icke is an anti-Semite, or that he is a neo-Nazi. The best place to start with this is the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This, for the uninitiated, is a text from the late 1800s supposedly detailing a Jewish elite's plan for world conquest.
The Protocols have been said to be a forgery, and a hoax. In a sense this is correct. However, if you read what is in the Protocols, it does bear semblance to real-world events that followed during the 20th Century, and which are continuing: the push for world economic and ultimately military dictatorship is very real. Does this mean that the Protocols were right all along? No.
There does exist a global elite. Some say they are Jewish - personally I disagree. The history of the house of Rothschild, for example, is one of a Jewish connection, support for Zionism, and financial control. Are the three things related? Not necessarily. The concept of the 'elite Jewish bankers' outlined by many including Hitler is not essentially true - as Icke said, they don't give a damn about ordinary Jews, as it is clear that Hitler was funded by big money from the Anglosphere.
I don't personally believe that the globalist conspiracy is a Jewish one...just the example of 'them' funding Hitler above is fairly damning to that claim. As I have said before, if there is a religious ideology driving their work, it is Satanism (evidence for this coming from Bohemian Grove among other things...doesn't look very Jewish to me...)
So, if the elite aren't Jewish, why is Icke saying they are? The answer is that this is another thing myself and Icke would disagree on. It is indisputable that large numbers of Zionists (distinguishing Zionist from Jew at this point) are connected to the power elite, whether via AIPAC, or big banks, or the Israeli Government.
"We the Jewish people control America" - Ariel Sharon
The Israeli influence on America is obvious, clear and uncontestable. The unconditional support from the US for a racist state that has done little but ethnically cleanse (^) since its inception, is in my opinion shameful. This leads some to decide that Israel is the pinnacle of global power today, and thus that the globalist One World Government/New World Order conspiracy is Jewish or Zionist in nature. With this I do not agree - it's over-simplistic.
So I believe that the Protocols, or the texts from which the Protocols were apparently copied, are genuine in a sense. They outline the structure of the global conspiracy quite well. But they make it look as if the eternal Jew is responsible for it all, which looks like classic divide and conquer to me. The elites can then hide behind Judaism and Israel, and make it look as if 'the Jews' are to blame for their actions.
The ADL have to be mentioned here too. They smear anything anti-New World Order as being anti-Semitic; it's what they do, they are a hate group. They were also involved in writing the recent MIAC report calling libertarians terrorists. They cite the Protocols as an example of why anti NWO people are Jew haters.
This is another reason why the Protocols were most likely a fraud to label the globalist agenda as being Jewish, so that anyone who recognised and opposed it could easily be painted an anti-Semite. Ironically, the ADL does everything they can to encourage anti-Semitism by these actions, but I think people shouldn't take the bait.
So, after explaining the background to what I would call a vicious smear, is Icke a neo-Nazi? Let's take a look, shall we...
- Does he believe in racial supremacy and racial ideology? No.
- Does he believe the world Jewry is a plague on the Earth? No, he merely said once that the elite of the planet are Jewish. Not something I agree with but hardly neo-Nazi. Also, his main claim about the elites is that they are reptillians from another dimension; I hadn't heard he had said they were Jewish before until this was pointed out. The two hardly go hand in hand.
- Does he say the Holocaust never happened or that it was justified, or that it should be repeated? No.
- Does he have an admiration for Adolf Hitler? No.
- Does he endorse eugenics? No, he opposes the eugenics/Nazi-related global elite.
- Does he support a fascist political agenda? No, he opposes the NWO's fascist political agenda.
Seig Icke! Or not.
ADL smear on Icke:
Left-wing/Anarchist
Icke, David. Added 9/30/01.
In an essay on his Web site titled "Alice in Wonderland and the WTC disaster," conspiracy theorist and anti-Semite David Icke writes, "If you are looking for the force behind the U.S. atrocities, just ask: who benefits?" According to Icke, the September 11 attacks were the doing of the Illuminati, "the force that seeks to control this world and introduce its global fascist state." Although the world was moving towards global centralized fascism, Icke writes, it was not moving fast enough to suit the elites, who saw opposition to their globalization plans growing. As a result, they planned something of "enormous magnitude" that would "so devastate the collective human mind" that "solutions" could be offered that "would advance the agenda in a colossal leap almost overnight." According to Icke, Osama Bin Laden, though "deeply misguided," is no more responsible for the attacks than Icke was. He was the equivalent of Lee Harvey Oswald, a convenient villain upon which the crime could be blamed.
'Cause all that sounds sooo anti-Semitic! And the Illuminati are not necessarily Jewish either, just to clear that up. They are allegedly a satanic cult as much as anything else. Some claim they are Jewish, personally again I don't agree. Ordinary Jewish people wouldn't endorse their crimes or their strange rituals as displayed at the Grove. Some do have Jewish blood relations, some are ostensibly Jews/Zionists, but again the broad-brush generalisation only plays into their hands.
And on that note,
Neutrei Karta
Jews Against Zionism
Jews sans frontieres
The good Jews, and there are plenty of them, are taking back their faith from being used as a shield by the globalists. The ADL would probably call them vehement anti-Semites.
Finally, the link in the smear between Icke and Alex Jones is unfair. The two have not got along at all until recently - Icke isn't a regular writer for Infowars and Jones notably described Icke as a "turd in the punch bowl" a few years ago for his alleged mixing of credible and not-so-credible information.
Jones (and his Jewish wife) have been accused of being secret Zionists who lead those in the Freedom Movement astray from the 'truth' that the Jews are behind it all. If you really want to call someone in Concpiracy Land a neo-Nazi, I would suggest you start with Prothink.org (real pro-fascist neo-Nazis) before slandering Icke or Infowars.
The Freedom Movement never is, was, or will be about race; the philosophy of liberty views people as sovereign individuals, not parts of a collective of any kind - so how can a race or any other simplistic group type be declared evil? Liberty is the antithesis of collectivism, racism, fascism, tyranny and all of the problems we experience in our society today. As I have written before, the flawed left wing/right wing philosophy has to be abandoned so that people can rediscover the idea of liberty, in the spirit of the American Founding Fathers, John Locke, and others.
Icke wants to break the psychological enslavement of the left-right paradigm, so does Jones, and millions of people who are waking up to global tyranny that can and will be defeated. Not a victory for neo-Nazism, rather a defeat for that and a victory for liberty!
Boston Top News Examiner article attacking David Icke and Infowars
I'd better get it out of the way that I do not agree with everything stated by David Icke; I'm not particularly concerned by the possibility that the global elite are reptillians and I don't believe in the New Age/spiritual stuff. But hey, to each his own.
There exists, in my view, a false smear that Icke is an anti-Semite, or that he is a neo-Nazi. The best place to start with this is the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This, for the uninitiated, is a text from the late 1800s supposedly detailing a Jewish elite's plan for world conquest.
The Protocols have been said to be a forgery, and a hoax. In a sense this is correct. However, if you read what is in the Protocols, it does bear semblance to real-world events that followed during the 20th Century, and which are continuing: the push for world economic and ultimately military dictatorship is very real. Does this mean that the Protocols were right all along? No.
There does exist a global elite. Some say they are Jewish - personally I disagree. The history of the house of Rothschild, for example, is one of a Jewish connection, support for Zionism, and financial control. Are the three things related? Not necessarily. The concept of the 'elite Jewish bankers' outlined by many including Hitler is not essentially true - as Icke said, they don't give a damn about ordinary Jews, as it is clear that Hitler was funded by big money from the Anglosphere.
I don't personally believe that the globalist conspiracy is a Jewish one...just the example of 'them' funding Hitler above is fairly damning to that claim. As I have said before, if there is a religious ideology driving their work, it is Satanism (evidence for this coming from Bohemian Grove among other things...doesn't look very Jewish to me...)
So, if the elite aren't Jewish, why is Icke saying they are? The answer is that this is another thing myself and Icke would disagree on. It is indisputable that large numbers of Zionists (distinguishing Zionist from Jew at this point) are connected to the power elite, whether via AIPAC, or big banks, or the Israeli Government.
"We the Jewish people control America" - Ariel Sharon
The Israeli influence on America is obvious, clear and uncontestable. The unconditional support from the US for a racist state that has done little but ethnically cleanse (^) since its inception, is in my opinion shameful. This leads some to decide that Israel is the pinnacle of global power today, and thus that the globalist One World Government/New World Order conspiracy is Jewish or Zionist in nature. With this I do not agree - it's over-simplistic.
So I believe that the Protocols, or the texts from which the Protocols were apparently copied, are genuine in a sense. They outline the structure of the global conspiracy quite well. But they make it look as if the eternal Jew is responsible for it all, which looks like classic divide and conquer to me. The elites can then hide behind Judaism and Israel, and make it look as if 'the Jews' are to blame for their actions.
The ADL have to be mentioned here too. They smear anything anti-New World Order as being anti-Semitic; it's what they do, they are a hate group. They were also involved in writing the recent MIAC report calling libertarians terrorists. They cite the Protocols as an example of why anti NWO people are Jew haters.
This is another reason why the Protocols were most likely a fraud to label the globalist agenda as being Jewish, so that anyone who recognised and opposed it could easily be painted an anti-Semite. Ironically, the ADL does everything they can to encourage anti-Semitism by these actions, but I think people shouldn't take the bait.
So, after explaining the background to what I would call a vicious smear, is Icke a neo-Nazi? Let's take a look, shall we...
- Does he believe in racial supremacy and racial ideology? No.
- Does he believe the world Jewry is a plague on the Earth? No, he merely said once that the elite of the planet are Jewish. Not something I agree with but hardly neo-Nazi. Also, his main claim about the elites is that they are reptillians from another dimension; I hadn't heard he had said they were Jewish before until this was pointed out. The two hardly go hand in hand.
- Does he say the Holocaust never happened or that it was justified, or that it should be repeated? No.
- Does he have an admiration for Adolf Hitler? No.
- Does he endorse eugenics? No, he opposes the eugenics/Nazi-related global elite.
- Does he support a fascist political agenda? No, he opposes the NWO's fascist political agenda.
Seig Icke! Or not.
ADL smear on Icke:
Left-wing/Anarchist
Icke, David. Added 9/30/01.
In an essay on his Web site titled "Alice in Wonderland and the WTC disaster," conspiracy theorist and anti-Semite David Icke writes, "If you are looking for the force behind the U.S. atrocities, just ask: who benefits?" According to Icke, the September 11 attacks were the doing of the Illuminati, "the force that seeks to control this world and introduce its global fascist state." Although the world was moving towards global centralized fascism, Icke writes, it was not moving fast enough to suit the elites, who saw opposition to their globalization plans growing. As a result, they planned something of "enormous magnitude" that would "so devastate the collective human mind" that "solutions" could be offered that "would advance the agenda in a colossal leap almost overnight." According to Icke, Osama Bin Laden, though "deeply misguided," is no more responsible for the attacks than Icke was. He was the equivalent of Lee Harvey Oswald, a convenient villain upon which the crime could be blamed.
'Cause all that sounds sooo anti-Semitic! And the Illuminati are not necessarily Jewish either, just to clear that up. They are allegedly a satanic cult as much as anything else. Some claim they are Jewish, personally again I don't agree. Ordinary Jewish people wouldn't endorse their crimes or their strange rituals as displayed at the Grove. Some do have Jewish blood relations, some are ostensibly Jews/Zionists, but again the broad-brush generalisation only plays into their hands.
And on that note,
Neutrei Karta
Jews Against Zionism
Jews sans frontieres
The good Jews, and there are plenty of them, are taking back their faith from being used as a shield by the globalists. The ADL would probably call them vehement anti-Semites.
Finally, the link in the smear between Icke and Alex Jones is unfair. The two have not got along at all until recently - Icke isn't a regular writer for Infowars and Jones notably described Icke as a "turd in the punch bowl" a few years ago for his alleged mixing of credible and not-so-credible information.
Jones (and his Jewish wife) have been accused of being secret Zionists who lead those in the Freedom Movement astray from the 'truth' that the Jews are behind it all. If you really want to call someone in Concpiracy Land a neo-Nazi, I would suggest you start with Prothink.org (real pro-fascist neo-Nazis) before slandering Icke or Infowars.
The Freedom Movement never is, was, or will be about race; the philosophy of liberty views people as sovereign individuals, not parts of a collective of any kind - so how can a race or any other simplistic group type be declared evil? Liberty is the antithesis of collectivism, racism, fascism, tyranny and all of the problems we experience in our society today. As I have written before, the flawed left wing/right wing philosophy has to be abandoned so that people can rediscover the idea of liberty, in the spirit of the American Founding Fathers, John Locke, and others.
Icke wants to break the psychological enslavement of the left-right paradigm, so does Jones, and millions of people who are waking up to global tyranny that can and will be defeated. Not a victory for neo-Nazism, rather a defeat for that and a victory for liberty!
Saturday, 25 April 2009
Has AIDS Already Been Cured?
What do you make of this US Patent from 1997?
US Patent #5,676,977
What is claimed is:
1. A method of treating AIDS-afflicted humans comprising injecting a multitude of tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals into the bloodstream of the human subject.
2. A method for increasing white blood cell counts in AIDS-afflicted humans comprising injecting a multitude of tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals into the bloodstream of the human subject.
3. Methods of treating AIDS-affilicted humans according to claims 1-2 where the concentration of said molecular crystals is approximately 40 PPM of the total blood weight of the human subject.
Read more on the patent, particularly the examples! Is a cure being supressed for one of the depopulationists' favourite diseases? I googled "aids cure tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals" but mostly it seems to be pages detailing the patent, and people like me wondering whether it works.
Strike that, a doctor called Boyd Graves (boydgraves.com) is an advocate for full-scale trials of tetrasil (the cure detailed above). I guess Big Pharma is responsible for keeping this supressed. What a cause! Imagine all the do-goody types who dream of a cure for AIDS, yet it might well already exist! Insane, yet it serves to remind us about the evil of the global elite.
(And the relevance of the picture...the dirty secret is that AIDS might have been manmade, and certainly is used as a bioweapon...)
Update: Another thing to consider is this paper, "Reporting Inactivation of AIDS Virus by Electric Current". Interesting.
US Patent #5,676,977
What is claimed is:
1. A method of treating AIDS-afflicted humans comprising injecting a multitude of tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals into the bloodstream of the human subject.
2. A method for increasing white blood cell counts in AIDS-afflicted humans comprising injecting a multitude of tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals into the bloodstream of the human subject.
3. Methods of treating AIDS-affilicted humans according to claims 1-2 where the concentration of said molecular crystals is approximately 40 PPM of the total blood weight of the human subject.
Read more on the patent, particularly the examples! Is a cure being supressed for one of the depopulationists' favourite diseases? I googled "aids cure tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystals" but mostly it seems to be pages detailing the patent, and people like me wondering whether it works.
Strike that, a doctor called Boyd Graves (boydgraves.com) is an advocate for full-scale trials of tetrasil (the cure detailed above). I guess Big Pharma is responsible for keeping this supressed. What a cause! Imagine all the do-goody types who dream of a cure for AIDS, yet it might well already exist! Insane, yet it serves to remind us about the evil of the global elite.
(And the relevance of the picture...the dirty secret is that AIDS might have been manmade, and certainly is used as a bioweapon...)
Update: Another thing to consider is this paper, "Reporting Inactivation of AIDS Virus by Electric Current". Interesting.
Friday, 24 April 2009
Captured, Killed, Never Existed, Now Captured Again
The above is what we have been told about Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, the supposed Al CIAda chief in Iraq.
Infowars - Al Qaeda chief in Iraq: Captured, Killed, Never Existed, Now Captured Again
You couldn’t make it up if you tried. AFP today reports that Al-Qaeda chief in Iraq, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, has been captured and arrested. The problem with this is that al-Baghdadi has already been reported captured, previously reported killed and even said to have never actually existed by the U.S. military.
“Abu Omar al-Baghdadi was arrested today in Baghdad,” Baghdad security spokesman Major General Qasim Atta told AFP.
“It was Iraqi forces who arrested him based on an intelligence tipoff from someone,” he added.
Also known as Abu Hamza al-Baghdadi and Abu Abdullah al-Rashid al-Baghdadi, many questions have surrounded the so called leader of al Qaeda’s political front organization the “Islamic State of Iraq”.
He was thought to have been one of the figures to succeed the equally shadowy Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as a leader of insurgent forces in Iraq in 2006, after al Zarqawi, who was also previously reported captured and killed on several occasions, was laid to rest for good by the PR arm of the Pentagon.
The announcement of al-Baghdadi’s capture today jars with multiple previous reports from up to two years ago, detailing his arrest, his death and even questioning his existence altogether.
In March 2007, the Interior Ministry of Iraq claimed that al-Baghdadi had been captured in Baghdad. This was reported by AP and picked up by the likes of CNN, whose report stated that another insurgent had positively confirmed al-Baghdadi’s identity.
The U.S. military denied that al-Baghdadi was in their custody, however, and one day later Iraqi officials retracted their statements regarding his arrest.
Indeed this back and forth announcement of capture and later retraction occurred three times in the space of one week.
Then one month later, on May 3, 2007, the Iraqi Interior Ministry announced that al-Baghdadi had been killed by American and Iraqi forces north of Baghdad.
However, in July 2007, the U.S. military reported that al-Baghdadi had never actually existed and was, for all intents and purposes, a myth.
A reportedly high ranking “Al Qaeda in Iraq” detainee identified as Khaled al-Mashhadani, then claimed that al-Baghdadi was a fictional character created to give an Iraqi face to a foreign-run terror group, and that the “Islamic State of Iraq” was a “virtual organisation in cyberspace” created by al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Ayub al Masri.
The person claiming to be Baghdadi continued to release video and audiotapes attacking U.S. occupation of Iraq, but refused to show his face.
The U.S. military’s claim that Baghdadi is a fictitious character was then challenged in May 2008 after a police chief in Haditha said Baghdadi’s real identity is Hamed Dawood Mohammed Khalil al Zawi. “He was an officer in the security services and was dismissed from the army because of his extremism,” the police chief told al Arabiya television.
Now Baghdadi has been reported captured again!
This saga is another example of how a manufactured smoke and mirrors propaganda veils reality. The “war on terror” mantra continues to be propagated as justification to wage permanent occupation and control over the middle east by the global elite.
Al Qaeda in Iraq, al Zarqawi, al Baghdadi and the legions of other al qaeda operatives who have been reportedly captured and killed over and over are used as interchangeable PR tools.
Are or were any of them ever real? Possibly. However that matters little now.
Once again 99% of the corporate media will no doubt enthusiastically champion this latest arrest as a key victory in the continuing war on terror, and the majority of Americans who even notice will not take a second glance at the ludicrous back story.
Infowars - Al Qaeda chief in Iraq: Captured, Killed, Never Existed, Now Captured Again
You couldn’t make it up if you tried. AFP today reports that Al-Qaeda chief in Iraq, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, has been captured and arrested. The problem with this is that al-Baghdadi has already been reported captured, previously reported killed and even said to have never actually existed by the U.S. military.
“Abu Omar al-Baghdadi was arrested today in Baghdad,” Baghdad security spokesman Major General Qasim Atta told AFP.
“It was Iraqi forces who arrested him based on an intelligence tipoff from someone,” he added.
Also known as Abu Hamza al-Baghdadi and Abu Abdullah al-Rashid al-Baghdadi, many questions have surrounded the so called leader of al Qaeda’s political front organization the “Islamic State of Iraq”.
He was thought to have been one of the figures to succeed the equally shadowy Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as a leader of insurgent forces in Iraq in 2006, after al Zarqawi, who was also previously reported captured and killed on several occasions, was laid to rest for good by the PR arm of the Pentagon.
The announcement of al-Baghdadi’s capture today jars with multiple previous reports from up to two years ago, detailing his arrest, his death and even questioning his existence altogether.
In March 2007, the Interior Ministry of Iraq claimed that al-Baghdadi had been captured in Baghdad. This was reported by AP and picked up by the likes of CNN, whose report stated that another insurgent had positively confirmed al-Baghdadi’s identity.
The U.S. military denied that al-Baghdadi was in their custody, however, and one day later Iraqi officials retracted their statements regarding his arrest.
Indeed this back and forth announcement of capture and later retraction occurred three times in the space of one week.
Then one month later, on May 3, 2007, the Iraqi Interior Ministry announced that al-Baghdadi had been killed by American and Iraqi forces north of Baghdad.
However, in July 2007, the U.S. military reported that al-Baghdadi had never actually existed and was, for all intents and purposes, a myth.
A reportedly high ranking “Al Qaeda in Iraq” detainee identified as Khaled al-Mashhadani, then claimed that al-Baghdadi was a fictional character created to give an Iraqi face to a foreign-run terror group, and that the “Islamic State of Iraq” was a “virtual organisation in cyberspace” created by al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Ayub al Masri.
The person claiming to be Baghdadi continued to release video and audiotapes attacking U.S. occupation of Iraq, but refused to show his face.
The U.S. military’s claim that Baghdadi is a fictitious character was then challenged in May 2008 after a police chief in Haditha said Baghdadi’s real identity is Hamed Dawood Mohammed Khalil al Zawi. “He was an officer in the security services and was dismissed from the army because of his extremism,” the police chief told al Arabiya television.
Now Baghdadi has been reported captured again!
This saga is another example of how a manufactured smoke and mirrors propaganda veils reality. The “war on terror” mantra continues to be propagated as justification to wage permanent occupation and control over the middle east by the global elite.
Al Qaeda in Iraq, al Zarqawi, al Baghdadi and the legions of other al qaeda operatives who have been reportedly captured and killed over and over are used as interchangeable PR tools.
Are or were any of them ever real? Possibly. However that matters little now.
Once again 99% of the corporate media will no doubt enthusiastically champion this latest arrest as a key victory in the continuing war on terror, and the majority of Americans who even notice will not take a second glance at the ludicrous back story.
Gurkha Veterans deserve right to stay
They have earned it, after all.
Press Association: Gurkhas to hear settlement ruling
Gurkha campaigners are due to find out if the Government has bowed to pressure to give veterans who left the Army before 1997 the automatic right to settle in the UK.
Immigration rules introduced in 2004 allowed serving Gurkhas with at least four years' service to settle in the UK.
But the rules do not apply to Gurkhas discharged from the British Army before July 1 1997.
Last year a High Court judge ruled that the policy excluding older veterans was unlawful and in need of urgent review.
The Government pledged to publish a new policy by December 2008 but the deadline passed without an announcement and in March campaigners returned to court to enforce the ruling.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is due to announce the new policy to the House of Commons while Gurkha veterans and campaigner-cum-actress Joanna Lumley watch from the public gallery.
But campaigners fear the new rules will still not give older Gurkhas the same rights as their younger counterparts.
Gurkhas who left the Army before 1997 are allowed to apply for the right to settle in this country but more than 2,000 former Gurkha soldiers have been refused permission.
Victoria Cross winner Tul Bahadur Pun, who is in his 80s, was only granted leave to stay in 2007 after a long campaign against a decision by officials to turn down his application.
The Gurkha brigade was formed following the partition of India in 1947 but Nepalese Gurkha soldiers have been part of the British Army for almost 200 years.
Press Association: Gurkhas to hear settlement ruling
Gurkha campaigners are due to find out if the Government has bowed to pressure to give veterans who left the Army before 1997 the automatic right to settle in the UK.
Immigration rules introduced in 2004 allowed serving Gurkhas with at least four years' service to settle in the UK.
But the rules do not apply to Gurkhas discharged from the British Army before July 1 1997.
Last year a High Court judge ruled that the policy excluding older veterans was unlawful and in need of urgent review.
The Government pledged to publish a new policy by December 2008 but the deadline passed without an announcement and in March campaigners returned to court to enforce the ruling.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is due to announce the new policy to the House of Commons while Gurkha veterans and campaigner-cum-actress Joanna Lumley watch from the public gallery.
But campaigners fear the new rules will still not give older Gurkhas the same rights as their younger counterparts.
Gurkhas who left the Army before 1997 are allowed to apply for the right to settle in this country but more than 2,000 former Gurkha soldiers have been refused permission.
Victoria Cross winner Tul Bahadur Pun, who is in his 80s, was only granted leave to stay in 2007 after a long campaign against a decision by officials to turn down his application.
The Gurkha brigade was formed following the partition of India in 1947 but Nepalese Gurkha soldiers have been part of the British Army for almost 200 years.
Thursday, 23 April 2009
Cut Down Trees to Fight Global Warming
You just can't make this up...it's real...
Metro - Global warming? Cut down forests
It might seem a mad idea – but cutting down forests might actually help fight global warming, according to research.
Thousands of pine trees in Canada and northern Europe are actually adding to the problem by stopping the Sun's rays reaching reflective snow beneath them, scientists have found.
The discovery goes against the general assumption that planting trees will help combat climate change.
That theory is based on the fact trees reduce the amount of greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the air by absorbing it and 'breathing out' oxygen.
This is what Karl Rove meant when he said "we create our own reality". No you don't! You, all of you, sell a giant illusion/delusion to the people! And some are so into it, so controlled by the TV, that they will simultaneously believe that cutting down trees will fight global warming, that planting trees will fight global warming, that hugging trees will fight global warming, even when global warming isn't happening!
Metro - Global warming? Cut down forests
It might seem a mad idea – but cutting down forests might actually help fight global warming, according to research.
Thousands of pine trees in Canada and northern Europe are actually adding to the problem by stopping the Sun's rays reaching reflective snow beneath them, scientists have found.
The discovery goes against the general assumption that planting trees will help combat climate change.
That theory is based on the fact trees reduce the amount of greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the air by absorbing it and 'breathing out' oxygen.
This is what Karl Rove meant when he said "we create our own reality". No you don't! You, all of you, sell a giant illusion/delusion to the people! And some are so into it, so controlled by the TV, that they will simultaneously believe that cutting down trees will fight global warming, that planting trees will fight global warming, that hugging trees will fight global warming, even when global warming isn't happening!
"Interrogation Techniques" is Newspeak for Torture
"You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it." - Malcolm X
British troops were accused at the High Court yesterday of using interrogation techniques on Iraqi civilian detainees that breached human rights laws.
Six Iraqis were asking the court to order an independent public inquiry into allegations that soldiers may have killed up to 20 captives held after a gun battle in southern Iraq in 2004.
They are putting medical evidence before the court which they say supports their contentions that captives were tortured, murdered and their bodies mutilated.
See how casual that is? Soldiers may have killed 20 detainees 20 PEOPLE, oh well, accidents happen I guess. NO. Accidents do not happen and NO it's not OK because 'it saves lives' - it doesn't. Rather, in this case it ended about 20 of them ^. Some people just don't get it - the 'detainees' are mostly goat herders sold as terrorists so that those who captured them get the bounty for an arrest.
US President Barack Obama is wading through the legal, political and moral morass created by the Bush administration's approval of interrogation techniques, which he - and many others - consider to be torture.
It has turned out to be a tricky path to navigate.
By publishing the legal advice that his predecessor used to justify the techniques, yet making it clear that he does not intend to press charges against those involved in the decision-making or the interrogations, he has left himself open to criticism from the right and the left.
Some of the strongest comments have come from his own supporters, who believe that the president can not simply wipe the slate clean; that his call for "reflection, not retribution", amounts to a whitewash.
There are plenty of voices calling for a full investigation, with charges being pressed against anyone found to have committed acts of torture in the name of the United States.
That is some complex propaganda right there:
- Obama is not ending torture, nor does he want to. Gitmo is just a showhome compared to the CIA's secret prisons around the world.
- The article suggests Obama is going up against the establishment in DC. Nothing could be further from the truth. He was their choice so they could stay in power and keep theor two-party dictatorship!
- Torture is ineffective even with real terrorists (they'll confess to anything), but since Al-Qaeda is a CIA creation, it's unlikely that any real Al-Qaeda (eg Osama, whose family are best buddies with the Bush family) will have been through Guantanamo. Even Khaled Sheik Mohammed, (laughably) the 'mastermind' of 9/11. He made NORAD stand down from his cave...he trained the hijackers in US military bases (oops delete that last part, surely it didn't happen?).
- And finally, in case you haven't figured it out yet, They Own Both Parties.
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
Why we need to kill the babies
To save the planet, of course!
Mother Jones - "Tiniest of Baby Booms" a Monster
You can't miss it in today's news: US births break record, 40 percent out-of-wedlock. Frankly, my dear, who gives a s*** about the wedding bands. Though that's pretty much what all the moralizing is about.
No, what's stupefying is the fact that nowhere in this much-travelled article does anyone ever talk about the real impact of more babies being born in the US in 2007 than any other year in the nation's history.
So let's talk about it. And let's start with a really interesting study just published in the journal Global Environmental Change. A couple of statisticians at Oregon State U disengaged their mechanical pencils from their pocket protectors, clicked some fresh lead onto recycled paper (we hope) and came up with this bold analysis into that sacristy of human reproduction—to have or not to have:
A mother and father are each responsible for one half of the emissions of their offspring and 1/4 the emissions of their grandchildren and so on forever or thereabouts
Therefore, under current US conditions, each child adds 9,441 metric tons of CO2 to the carbon legacy of the average female
That's 5.7 times her lifetime emissions
Translation: one child costs nearly 6 times your own CO2 emissions
In the pessimistic scenario, each American child adds 12,730 metric tons to your carbon legacy
In comparison, under current Bangladeshi conditions, each child adds 56 metric tons of CO2 to the carbon legacy of the average female
The bottom line is that absolutely nothing else you can do—driving a more fuel efficient car, driving less, installing energy-efficient windows, replacing lightbulbs, replacing refrigerators, recycling—comes even close to simply not having that child. All those good things still add up to less than 500 metric tons of CO2 savings. Not having the kid saves between 10,000 and 13,000 metric tons of CO2.
So why are we still giving tax breaks for having kids? Why are we pretending that because they're cute they're harmless? Little monsters.
No, YOU are the monsters, 'environmentalist' eugenicists.
Overpopulation - Myth and Reality
Reduce Your Water Footprint
No, not carbon, water. WATER. How much do you use? Remember, every time you consume anything (as you are a 'useless eater'), it's like taking a knife to poor Gaia.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123483638138996305.html
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/from-carbon-footprints-to-water-footprints/
WWF UK - Water Footprint
And it's worth noting that the UK is a relatively wet country, so much so that a lack of sunlight has been blamed for vitamin D deficiencies in Scotland. We don't have a water problem; there is no water scarcity in Britain except in the most extreme summer droughts. However, that hasn't stopped the climate nuts from holding the threat of water rationing over our heads.
Cops can now 'take all your stuff'
Yes, they can.
Toronto Sun
via Infowars.com
There have been some terrible miscarriages of justice due to proceeds of crime legislation in other countries.
Whether Canada will do better remains to be seen.
To the surprise of at least one legal expert, the Supreme Court of Canada last week unanimously gave the provinces incredible powers to seize assets allegedly connected to crime.
For a country that has gained the reputation, whether deserved or not, of protecting the rights of the accused over the rights of victims, it's quite an about-face.
As one worried reader e-mailed the other day: "This is a terrifying development. If the police even suspect you of a crime, they can take all your stuff. They don't have to prove it."
Is he right? "Yes and no," says University of Manitoba law professor Michelle Gallant. The cops can take your car, for instance, if they think you're using it to sell drugs.
But the police have to persuade a judge that, on a balance of probabilities, the vehicle is connected to crime. And that's much easier to show than providing evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that someone is guilty of a crime.
In other words, if the police want your car, house, money or any other assets, they can get away with it without even arresting you as long as they convince a judge something doesn't smell right. No conviction necessary.
"It's kind of scary," says Gallant, an expert in proceeds of crime, who never thought Canada would embrace such wide-ranging legislation.
While the goal -- going after assets associated with crimes like drug trafficking -- is laudatory, it's an awful lot of leeway to give the government, she says.
Toronto Sunvia Infowars.com
There have been some terrible miscarriages of justice due to proceeds of crime legislation in other countries.
Whether Canada will do better remains to be seen.
To the surprise of at least one legal expert, the Supreme Court of Canada last week unanimously gave the provinces incredible powers to seize assets allegedly connected to crime.
For a country that has gained the reputation, whether deserved or not, of protecting the rights of the accused over the rights of victims, it's quite an about-face.
As one worried reader e-mailed the other day: "This is a terrifying development. If the police even suspect you of a crime, they can take all your stuff. They don't have to prove it."
Is he right? "Yes and no," says University of Manitoba law professor Michelle Gallant. The cops can take your car, for instance, if they think you're using it to sell drugs.
But the police have to persuade a judge that, on a balance of probabilities, the vehicle is connected to crime. And that's much easier to show than providing evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that someone is guilty of a crime.
In other words, if the police want your car, house, money or any other assets, they can get away with it without even arresting you as long as they convince a judge something doesn't smell right. No conviction necessary.
"It's kind of scary," says Gallant, an expert in proceeds of crime, who never thought Canada would embrace such wide-ranging legislation.
While the goal -- going after assets associated with crimes like drug trafficking -- is laudatory, it's an awful lot of leeway to give the government, she says.
Operation Amalgam Virgo, June 2001
Operation Amalgam Virgo 01 - pdf document
This was a training op focusing on, of all people, Osama 'bogeyman' Bin Laden.
The irony is, despite all of this excellent training, NORAD still stood down on the day...oh dear, what an accident...
Well, their operators were thrown off the scent by different excercises going on during 9/11, focused on plane hijackings...at the same times...with the same targets...
9/11: Real World or Exercise?
And on this subject, it's important to remember the parallel drills running during the July 7 bombings too
This was a training op focusing on, of all people, Osama 'bogeyman' Bin Laden.
The irony is, despite all of this excellent training, NORAD still stood down on the day...oh dear, what an accident...
Well, their operators were thrown off the scent by different excercises going on during 9/11, focused on plane hijackings...at the same times...with the same targets...
9/11: Real World or Exercise?
And on this subject, it's important to remember the parallel drills running during the July 7 bombings too
The Amish don't suffer from Autism
And the Amish don't get vaccinated. Coincidence? Maybe.
From a Rense.com article
"I have not seen autism with the Amish," said Dr. Frank Noonan, a family practitioner in Lancaster County, Pa., who has treated thousands of Amish for a quarter-century. "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is."
Also...
Homefirst's medical director, Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, told us he is not aware of any cases of autism in never-vaccinated children; the national rate is 1 in 175, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "We have a fairly large practice," Eisenstein told us. "We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we've taken care of over the years, and I don't think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines. "We do have enough of a sample," Eisenstein said. "The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We're all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there's no communication. It's frightening. You can't touch them. It's not something that anyone would miss."
From a Rense.com article
"I have not seen autism with the Amish," said Dr. Frank Noonan, a family practitioner in Lancaster County, Pa., who has treated thousands of Amish for a quarter-century. "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is."
Also...
Homefirst's medical director, Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, told us he is not aware of any cases of autism in never-vaccinated children; the national rate is 1 in 175, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "We have a fairly large practice," Eisenstein told us. "We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we've taken care of over the years, and I don't think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines. "We do have enough of a sample," Eisenstein said. "The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We're all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there's no communication. It's frightening. You can't touch them. It's not something that anyone would miss."
Don't forget the Grace Commission
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grace_Commission
The Grace Commission Report was presented to Congress in January 1984. The Report claimed that if its recommendations were followed, $424 billion could be saved in three years, rising to $1.9 trillion per year by the year 2000. It estimated that the national debt, without these reforms, would rise to $13 trillion by the year 2000, while with the reforms they projected it would rise to only $2.5 trillion. In reality, the debt reached $5.8 trillion in 2000.
The Report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the Federal Government, and another one-third escapes collection due to the underground economy. "With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government."
The Congress did not act on the recommendations.
But others are...
http://www.endthefed.us/
The Grace Commission Report was presented to Congress in January 1984. The Report claimed that if its recommendations were followed, $424 billion could be saved in three years, rising to $1.9 trillion per year by the year 2000. It estimated that the national debt, without these reforms, would rise to $13 trillion by the year 2000, while with the reforms they projected it would rise to only $2.5 trillion. In reality, the debt reached $5.8 trillion in 2000.
The Report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the Federal Government, and another one-third escapes collection due to the underground economy. "With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government."
The Congress did not act on the recommendations.
But others are...
http://www.endthefed.us/
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
I'm supposed to die at 11! Wait...what?
It's my duty to die at 11.3 years, so that I can help save the planet. At least, according to this disgusting KIDS' game from Australia.
Called 'Planet Slayer', it helps kids learn about their environmental responsibility to die young enough so that they don't use more than their share of the planet. Good that children are becoming aware of true environMENTALism from a young age. Nothing like dying children to save the planet, right?
So, here's how it goes...I have a set amount of poisonous co2 deemed appropriate for me to spew into the atmosphere with my filthy lifestyle, including using a car, eating meat, or even just spending money. Once the calculator says I have used up my ration of carbon, it's time for me to die! After all, the safety of the planet depends on responsible obedient citizens like me...
What's that? Mr Rothschild over there has an unlimited carbon ration? Of course, that's because it's good people like him who raised environmental awareness! You on the other hand are a useless eater; do your bit for Mother Earth!
Take the test and find out when you need to die to save the planet. Also, note that the best thing you can do is to invest all your money in environmental businesses. Al Gore would be proud.
Called 'Planet Slayer', it helps kids learn about their environmental responsibility to die young enough so that they don't use more than their share of the planet. Good that children are becoming aware of true environMENTALism from a young age. Nothing like dying children to save the planet, right?
So, here's how it goes...I have a set amount of poisonous co2 deemed appropriate for me to spew into the atmosphere with my filthy lifestyle, including using a car, eating meat, or even just spending money. Once the calculator says I have used up my ration of carbon, it's time for me to die! After all, the safety of the planet depends on responsible obedient citizens like me...
What's that? Mr Rothschild over there has an unlimited carbon ration? Of course, that's because it's good people like him who raised environmental awareness! You on the other hand are a useless eater; do your bit for Mother Earth!
Take the test and find out when you need to die to save the planet. Also, note that the best thing you can do is to invest all your money in environmental businesses. Al Gore would be proud.
Ve Vere Jast Vollowing Orders!
AllGov - Obama: Torture OK if 'just following orders'
In a move with ominous implications for Constitutional rights in the United States, President Barack Obama announced on Thursday that his administration would not prosecute CIA employees or contractors who participated in the torturing of detainees in violation of the War Crimes Act of 1996. Saying now is “a time for reflection, not retribution,” the president declared it would be “unfair” to try and convict those who participated in the extraordinary rendition program created by the Bush administration and those who committed torture, because these actions had been sanctioned by legal memos prepared by President Bush’s Justice Department.
In the same prepared statement, President Obama said, “The United States is a nation of laws. My Administration will always act in accordance with those laws, and with an unshakeable commitment to our ideals.” But that promise flies in the face of the War Crimes Act of 1996, which the GOP-dominated Congress adopted, making it a federal crime to commit a “grave breach” of the Geneva Conventions, meaning the deliberate “killing, torture or inhuman treatment” of detainees. Even John Ashcroft, Bush’s first attorney general, said, “The War Crimes Act of 1996 makes violation of parts of the Geneva Convention a crime in the United States.” The U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2006 decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, affirmed that the War Crimes Act applied to detainees in the War on Terror.
Not only will the Obama administration not prosecute CIA workers, it will provide legal representation at no cost to them if called before international tribunals or congressional investigations. They also will be protected from having to pay any financial judgments.
In case you didn't get the subtle reference in the title, the 'just following orders' defence was used by the Nazis on trial at Nuremburg. Of course, it was found to be illegitimate as an excuse. But, if Obama and the CIA were running the trial, they'd all have been found innocent!
In a move with ominous implications for Constitutional rights in the United States, President Barack Obama announced on Thursday that his administration would not prosecute CIA employees or contractors who participated in the torturing of detainees in violation of the War Crimes Act of 1996. Saying now is “a time for reflection, not retribution,” the president declared it would be “unfair” to try and convict those who participated in the extraordinary rendition program created by the Bush administration and those who committed torture, because these actions had been sanctioned by legal memos prepared by President Bush’s Justice Department.
In the same prepared statement, President Obama said, “The United States is a nation of laws. My Administration will always act in accordance with those laws, and with an unshakeable commitment to our ideals.” But that promise flies in the face of the War Crimes Act of 1996, which the GOP-dominated Congress adopted, making it a federal crime to commit a “grave breach” of the Geneva Conventions, meaning the deliberate “killing, torture or inhuman treatment” of detainees. Even John Ashcroft, Bush’s first attorney general, said, “The War Crimes Act of 1996 makes violation of parts of the Geneva Convention a crime in the United States.” The U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2006 decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, affirmed that the War Crimes Act applied to detainees in the War on Terror.
Not only will the Obama administration not prosecute CIA workers, it will provide legal representation at no cost to them if called before international tribunals or congressional investigations. They also will be protected from having to pay any financial judgments.
In case you didn't get the subtle reference in the title, the 'just following orders' defence was used by the Nazis on trial at Nuremburg. Of course, it was found to be illegitimate as an excuse. But, if Obama and the CIA were running the trial, they'd all have been found innocent!
Monday, 20 April 2009
Change your lifestyle to save the planet!
BBC - 1970s lifestyle 'protects planet'
Getting back to the relatively slim, trim days of the 1970s would help to tackle climate change, researchers say.
The rising numbers of people who are overweight and obese in the UK means the nation uses 19% more food energy than 40 years ago, a study suggests.
That could equate to an extra 60 mega tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year, the team calculated.
Transport costs of a fatter population were also included in the International Journal of Epidemiology study.
I mean, how are we supposed to fit you into the cattle trains when you're all so fat?
More detail on this subject from a member of the Ayn Rand Institute:
Getting back to the relatively slim, trim days of the 1970s would help to tackle climate change, researchers say.
The rising numbers of people who are overweight and obese in the UK means the nation uses 19% more food energy than 40 years ago, a study suggests.
That could equate to an extra 60 mega tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year, the team calculated.
Transport costs of a fatter population were also included in the International Journal of Epidemiology study.
I mean, how are we supposed to fit you into the cattle trains when you're all so fat?
More detail on this subject from a member of the Ayn Rand Institute:
Sunday, 19 April 2009
"Weaving Spiders Come Not Here"
The above is the motto of the Bohemian Club, a secret society with a 130 year history. They meet annually at Bohemian Grove, California.
Nixon calls BG "the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine":
David Gergen gets asked a few uncomfortable questions about the Grove:
For more info on the Bohemian Club see Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian Grove
Nixon calls BG "the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine":
David Gergen gets asked a few uncomfortable questions about the Grove:
For more info on the Bohemian Club see Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian Grove
Does Anyone Believe the FSA?
FT: FSA Rejects Whistleblower's Claims
That's right, a former employee spoke out about the FSA ignoring problems in the markets...just for attention or something! Do you believe that?
Of course, the story uses the Hegelian Dialectic - either they 'couldn't have seen it coming', or 'they didn't regulate enough'. Thus it subtly conditions the reader that more regulation and 'oversight' is the solution. Bull.
(Image: The current estimates for the bailout costs are $12.8 Trillion, just short of the US GDP.)
More likely is the prospect that the FSA was part of the giant scam engulfing us all - the $1 Quadrilion-$1.4 Quadrillion Ponzi scheme called 'derivatives', and they knew fully what was happening; not only did they do nothing, but I'd bet individuals in the FSA were getting rich just like everyone else in the Square Mile, during the boom and now the bust.
Regulations are actually part of the fraud. For example, lending laws stipulating a ratio of equity to debt (fractional reserve), which essentially allow the banks to create money at will, lend it out, and have the nerve to demand interest on the worthless asset they created.
"The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in." - Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920's.
Gold, silver and other commodities should be used as 'legal tender' currency, or paper/digital assets representing said commodities. As such, the power to determine what is and is not 'legal tender' must be held by governments and not by private banking institutions that masquerade as government, as should the power to issue money. The international central banking scam can and will be defeated again, as it has been before.
That's right, a former employee spoke out about the FSA ignoring problems in the markets...just for attention or something! Do you believe that?
Of course, the story uses the Hegelian Dialectic - either they 'couldn't have seen it coming', or 'they didn't regulate enough'. Thus it subtly conditions the reader that more regulation and 'oversight' is the solution. Bull.
(Image: The current estimates for the bailout costs are $12.8 Trillion, just short of the US GDP.)More likely is the prospect that the FSA was part of the giant scam engulfing us all - the $1 Quadrilion-$1.4 Quadrillion Ponzi scheme called 'derivatives', and they knew fully what was happening; not only did they do nothing, but I'd bet individuals in the FSA were getting rich just like everyone else in the Square Mile, during the boom and now the bust.
Regulations are actually part of the fraud. For example, lending laws stipulating a ratio of equity to debt (fractional reserve), which essentially allow the banks to create money at will, lend it out, and have the nerve to demand interest on the worthless asset they created.
"The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in." - Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920's.
Gold, silver and other commodities should be used as 'legal tender' currency, or paper/digital assets representing said commodities. As such, the power to determine what is and is not 'legal tender' must be held by governments and not by private banking institutions that masquerade as government, as should the power to issue money. The international central banking scam can and will be defeated again, as it has been before.
Bertrand Russell is SCUM
The answer to 1984, is 1776. The following is a clip from the movie Endgame.
A Reminder: Obama Youth
Personally, I don't care whether he is secretly a Muslim or even if he is a Marxist. Ideology and background on their own are not destructive. If you really want to control a population, history teaches us, you need effective propaganda. You need a personality cult. You need people to volunteer themselves to be slaves of the mind, so that they may willingly relinquish their rights for the 'greater good'. You need an Obama Youth.
“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.” - Adolf Hitler
Maybe in ten years' time, these kids will be unleashed on the streets (as the 'youth corps') with M16s in their hands and fanaticism in their hearts, like a scene from a Third World nation. We can stop this now, before it happens!
“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.” - Adolf Hitler
Maybe in ten years' time, these kids will be unleashed on the streets (as the 'youth corps') with M16s in their hands and fanaticism in their hearts, like a scene from a Third World nation. We can stop this now, before it happens!
Saturday, 18 April 2009
How to deal with the police...
If you haven't seen this, it's from "The AntiTerrorist" who explains how you should act when confronted by police - and how you should not if you don't want to waive your rights.
Friday, 17 April 2009
Green Nut Prophesises Collapse of Society
Times: How civilisation will collapse - and when
Look, it's not that I think people who expect a collapse of society are insane. Many people do so, and cite many different causes, for example some people in the survivalist/militia movement in America, who I respect and I think are rational. However, this obvious piece of globalist shilling takes a different angle.
Climate Change, and Peak Oil, are apparently about to destroy society, and, "Like the monks of Lindisfarne, we have to choose what is worthwhile at this great turning point in history - the mixed pieces of myriad broken traditional cultures and the novel and shining bits of unravelling industrial modernity. All of this will end in the dustbin of history. Our task is to choose which pieces will be useful. What is worth saving?"
In other words, everything about productive industrial society is collapsing, and we have to choose what can and can not survive into the future. And he should know that the "broken traditional cultures" were broken BY the very globalists who will lord over us in their World Government if they are allowed to succeed. That whole paragraph smacks of New Age bs to me.
Climate Change is far from being proven to be caused by human activity; actually, if the Solar cycle hypothesis is correct, we will see a reduction in the Earth's temperature and increases in sea ice in the coming years. As for Peak Oil, well...it will happen, but I really doubt it will be as soon as some have said. Actually some people said oil output has already peaked! Not so sure about that one. Here is a balanced article about Peak Oil.
The fascist 'green' mindset (it's not really environmental at all, just 'mental') is all about the productive, independent, sovereign citizenry being a plague on the Earth. Thus, as a solution, we must submit to central ownership of everything - including ourselves. We must reduce our population, because every new child is an environment destroying monster, and we must scrap all individual power; instead, turn off our lights for Earth Hour and celebrate our slavery.
Lenin might have called the anti-co2 environmentalists 'useful idiots'.
At the same time, I don't want to be too harsh on the Times blogger who wrote this; he's probably a Zeitgeist fan, since he does understand how the bankers create and control credit from nothing to get everyone into debt slavery. And hey, if the Zeitgeist cult wasn't so Marxist-environmentalist and therefore anti-liberty, he might have figured out how the establishment benefits from the environmental fear-mongering.
Look, it's not that I think people who expect a collapse of society are insane. Many people do so, and cite many different causes, for example some people in the survivalist/militia movement in America, who I respect and I think are rational. However, this obvious piece of globalist shilling takes a different angle.
Climate Change, and Peak Oil, are apparently about to destroy society, and, "Like the monks of Lindisfarne, we have to choose what is worthwhile at this great turning point in history - the mixed pieces of myriad broken traditional cultures and the novel and shining bits of unravelling industrial modernity. All of this will end in the dustbin of history. Our task is to choose which pieces will be useful. What is worth saving?"In other words, everything about productive industrial society is collapsing, and we have to choose what can and can not survive into the future. And he should know that the "broken traditional cultures" were broken BY the very globalists who will lord over us in their World Government if they are allowed to succeed. That whole paragraph smacks of New Age bs to me.
Climate Change is far from being proven to be caused by human activity; actually, if the Solar cycle hypothesis is correct, we will see a reduction in the Earth's temperature and increases in sea ice in the coming years. As for Peak Oil, well...it will happen, but I really doubt it will be as soon as some have said. Actually some people said oil output has already peaked! Not so sure about that one. Here is a balanced article about Peak Oil.
The fascist 'green' mindset (it's not really environmental at all, just 'mental') is all about the productive, independent, sovereign citizenry being a plague on the Earth. Thus, as a solution, we must submit to central ownership of everything - including ourselves. We must reduce our population, because every new child is an environment destroying monster, and we must scrap all individual power; instead, turn off our lights for Earth Hour and celebrate our slavery.
Lenin might have called the anti-co2 environmentalists 'useful idiots'.
At the same time, I don't want to be too harsh on the Times blogger who wrote this; he's probably a Zeitgeist fan, since he does understand how the bankers create and control credit from nothing to get everyone into debt slavery. And hey, if the Zeitgeist cult wasn't so Marxist-environmentalist and therefore anti-liberty, he might have figured out how the establishment benefits from the environmental fear-mongering.
Thursday, 16 April 2009
How Obama suckered the Anti-Warists
Or to put it another way - the way that it's written: "How Obama rebranded the war on terror".
Basically it complains that he's using Newspeak to describe the same foreign policy that Bush supported.
The only problem is it then goes on to remind us of how dangerous our enemies are, and implicitly tells us how wonderful it is that we're over there spreading the goodness of democracy and depleted uranium.
It's not that the Taliban are, oh, just wonderful people or something. It's not that Sharia law is right or that the opression in Muslim countries is right. In fact, it's not even that all of the premises for the neocon agenda are wrong. It's just one premise that never gets discussed but is fundamentally flawed: that individual nations can act as the police of the world. No, they can't, not in the past, not now, and not in the future. Nobody can police the whole world, for granting such a concentration of power to such a small group of people is the antithesis of liberty; this is why non-interventionist foreign policy is so important. Because no matter how well meaning your foreign invasions are, in the end you will be treated as an occupying force.
Just apply a little bit of empathy: what if America or Britain was invaded by (let's say for argument's sake) the Chinese? They brought with them democracy, so long as you voted for certain approved candidates; they built huge military installations flying the Red flag high above your homeland; they benefited from your natural resources and patrolled your streets daily. Happy with that? Of course you are...why are the Iraqis and Afghans resisting, right?
Ron Paul said something similar
Basically it complains that he's using Newspeak to describe the same foreign policy that Bush supported.
The only problem is it then goes on to remind us of how dangerous our enemies are, and implicitly tells us how wonderful it is that we're over there spreading the goodness of democracy and depleted uranium.
It's not that the Taliban are, oh, just wonderful people or something. It's not that Sharia law is right or that the opression in Muslim countries is right. In fact, it's not even that all of the premises for the neocon agenda are wrong. It's just one premise that never gets discussed but is fundamentally flawed: that individual nations can act as the police of the world. No, they can't, not in the past, not now, and not in the future. Nobody can police the whole world, for granting such a concentration of power to such a small group of people is the antithesis of liberty; this is why non-interventionist foreign policy is so important. Because no matter how well meaning your foreign invasions are, in the end you will be treated as an occupying force.
Just apply a little bit of empathy: what if America or Britain was invaded by (let's say for argument's sake) the Chinese? They brought with them democracy, so long as you voted for certain approved candidates; they built huge military installations flying the Red flag high above your homeland; they benefited from your natural resources and patrolled your streets daily. Happy with that? Of course you are...why are the Iraqis and Afghans resisting, right?
Ron Paul said something similar
Drugs from the Internet are dangerous...
Mirror: GPs' health warning on drugs bought on internet
"...experts warned people are playing Russian roulette with their health using these online pharmacies."
And they don't play Russian Roulette when they go to a GP and get prescribed who knows what? What about when a veteran with PTSD takes their Prozac, and it makes them go nuts and kill themselves? After all, it's safe just to take the pills the big drug companies sell you.
"...experts warned people are playing Russian roulette with their health using these online pharmacies."
And they don't play Russian Roulette when they go to a GP and get prescribed who knows what? What about when a veteran with PTSD takes their Prozac, and it makes them go nuts and kill themselves? After all, it's safe just to take the pills the big drug companies sell you.
The Media Whores Have Come Round to Ron Paul
How's this for a little bit of inconsistency? The Young Turks, two videos, first is from a year ago when they were smearing Paul as a racist; second is from a two weeks ago, and now they (like many other media figures, eg Glenn Beck) welcome him on their show now they realise how popular he is. It's disgusting, but Paul is a gentleman about it all and I guess he's grateful for the publicity; maybe some Obamanoid lefties were woken up as a result of this appearance.
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
Footnotes on Israel, Zionism, Divide and Conquer
Time to cut the bull out of Middle Eastern politics and history. An alternative to the dumbed down narrative you learnt in school (or should I say, an alternative to the dumbed down narrative I learned in school...)
The first video is of a "gentile" receiving a warm welcome visiting Israel. I've never seen the film but apparently it's from "Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?"
Benjamin Freedman, former Zionist, spells out a few home truths back in 1961.
"Some cool facts about Israel"
The great myth about Palestine and the Zionist enclave of Israel is that it is built upon the principle of "A land without people, for a people without a land."
Jews are not "a people without a land", they may have been "a people without a government" in the first half of the 20th Century - but really "they" are not even one people at all. Judaism is a religion, not a race. In many ways there is no "Jewish race", at least not with ancestral ties to the land of Palestine. Most of the "Jewish people" are Eastern Europeans anyway.
And if Judaism is a religion and not a race, then Zionism is an ideology and not a religion. The Talmud - or certain parts of it - give Mein Kampf a run for its money in terms of just downright disgusting, racist, foul bigotry.
“One of the oldest problems puzzled over in the Talmud is: "Why did God create goyim?" The generally accepted answer is "somebody has to buy retail” - Zionist commentary on the Talmud.
'goyim' = term used as a defamation towards non-'Jews'. I put 'Jews' here in quote marks because true Jews are not Zionist, racist bigots. As stated above Zionism is an ideology, and as far as ideology goes it is right down there with the most base, hate-filled, brutal ideologies in history.
It's worth noting that some of those against the New World Order (eg Prothink.org, I refuse to link directly to it) have decided that we are facing a "Jew World Order". As I have said, and will continiue to say, this is playing into the hands of the global elite. Many of them are ostensibly Jews/Zionists yes, and Israel is an illegitimate state run by people with warped ideology, yes. But the defining factor is not them being Jewish...in fact, they're not even Jewish at all. They are evil.
Now that's the kind of discrimination I can get behind - let's discriminate based on good and evil, who does what; know the tree by its fruits, and so on. I do not know whether the elite are Jewish, Zionist, Christian, Satanist, Atheist, whatever. It doesn't really matter, because they are evil. All the evil people they've supported, including Hitler (which kind of ruins the "Jewish" hypothesis, however you cut it), demonstrate this.
Look, it's unavoidable that what Israel has done since its inception is evil. There exists the propaganda about all the savage Arabs who would 'drive Israel into the sea'...I might have believed it in 1948, but in 2008? Not buying it! Israel is by far the mightiest country in the Middle East, it faces no threat from any of its neighbours. It's a NUCLEAR POWER for crying out loud, so the furore over Iran is...just a little hypocritical.
Israel is a racist state, that's evident when you look at their immigration policy, their politics, their attitude towards non-Jews, especially Arabs who irony of all ironies, whatever you think of them, are the true natives on Palestinian soil.
At this point it becomes necessary to tackle one of the pervasive myths about Arabs in Western civilisation; that they want to take you over, or that if you support the Palestinians, you somehow are inviting your country to be taken over by Muslims. Really, that's the level of insanity and brainwashing we have reached in the West, and we have to admit that we have been conned.
First of all, let's deal with the "threat" of Muslim immigrants. They wouldn't be so numerous if the government didn't let so many in and purposefully let them stay. Not to say that Muslims are somehow a problem, far from it; our government makes the immigration problem by deliberately paying welfare to immigrants. If the taps were turned off, it wouldn't matter if 100 million Arabs lived in the UK, because it wouldn't cost other citizens a penny in tax, and the economy would benefit. Also, less would bring their families over; rather only the productive would come to work and send money back home; a win-win situation. The point is that government makes the immigrant problem, not the immigrants themselves.
The idea that "Muslims are out to get you" seems irrational. Not least because the people who really are getting you are behind the world's central banks (their mechanism for fraud) and I can tell you, they may be satanic, atheist, masonic, whatever; they aren't Arab or Muslim, I'll say that for sure. Also, 9/11 was indeed an inside job, pinned on the Al-CIAda patsy Bin Laden (do I really need to repeat this stuff?) The 7/7 story, while there is less substance on what happened, reeks of bull too. Al-Qaeda is not under your bed. The Mossad, however, may just be tapping your telephone.
Divide and Conquer is all over us again. We have been had. It's the Jews! It's the Muslims! It's the Masons or the Catholic Church! It's the left wing, the right wing! All these "groups", are built upon ordinary people who tend to be basically good. The Jew waves the flag of Israel not understanding he stands upon land that was stolen by ethinc cleansing. The Muslim prays facing Mecca while his brethren stone to death a girl in order to preserve "honour". The Obama supporter decries those trying to get them to snap out of their trance as "racist Republicans". None of the above people quite get it, get how they contribute to the evil, because they've been manipulated so badly that they refuse to accept the humiliation of it, so they double down on their bets (also known as drinking the Koolaid) and froth hatred at everyone else.
The point of all this is that evil people manipulate, and manipulators rise to the top in society. Human nature sucks, doesn't it? Thus, honest people will always have an uphill struggle maintaining some semblance of justice in authority, and this requires them to try and disentangle the webs the elites weave, to see the truth. Not an easy task. In this context, it is easy to get trapped down oversimplistic lines - 'liberal', 'conservative', black, white, Jew, Christian, Muslim.
These doctrines serve as a great benefit to the elite, for now all you little people can waste your time fighting each other instead of paying attention to your rulers. They built their World Government hidden in plain sight, only now however is it being rolled out. It's already been here for sixty years (UN/IMF), minus the global taxes that will come soon. This tyranny will be defeated by patriots, free humans the world over, mysteriously of all races and faiths. Because the defining factor uniting them will be good, and a hatred towards evil. Sometimes it's good to discriminate.
The first video is of a "gentile" receiving a warm welcome visiting Israel. I've never seen the film but apparently it's from "Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?"Benjamin Freedman, former Zionist, spells out a few home truths back in 1961.
"Some cool facts about Israel"
The great myth about Palestine and the Zionist enclave of Israel is that it is built upon the principle of "A land without people, for a people without a land."
Jews are not "a people without a land", they may have been "a people without a government" in the first half of the 20th Century - but really "they" are not even one people at all. Judaism is a religion, not a race. In many ways there is no "Jewish race", at least not with ancestral ties to the land of Palestine. Most of the "Jewish people" are Eastern Europeans anyway.
And if Judaism is a religion and not a race, then Zionism is an ideology and not a religion. The Talmud - or certain parts of it - give Mein Kampf a run for its money in terms of just downright disgusting, racist, foul bigotry.
“One of the oldest problems puzzled over in the Talmud is: "Why did God create goyim?" The generally accepted answer is "somebody has to buy retail” - Zionist commentary on the Talmud.
'goyim' = term used as a defamation towards non-'Jews'. I put 'Jews' here in quote marks because true Jews are not Zionist, racist bigots. As stated above Zionism is an ideology, and as far as ideology goes it is right down there with the most base, hate-filled, brutal ideologies in history.
It's worth noting that some of those against the New World Order (eg Prothink.org, I refuse to link directly to it) have decided that we are facing a "Jew World Order". As I have said, and will continiue to say, this is playing into the hands of the global elite. Many of them are ostensibly Jews/Zionists yes, and Israel is an illegitimate state run by people with warped ideology, yes. But the defining factor is not them being Jewish...in fact, they're not even Jewish at all. They are evil.
Now that's the kind of discrimination I can get behind - let's discriminate based on good and evil, who does what; know the tree by its fruits, and so on. I do not know whether the elite are Jewish, Zionist, Christian, Satanist, Atheist, whatever. It doesn't really matter, because they are evil. All the evil people they've supported, including Hitler (which kind of ruins the "Jewish" hypothesis, however you cut it), demonstrate this.
Look, it's unavoidable that what Israel has done since its inception is evil. There exists the propaganda about all the savage Arabs who would 'drive Israel into the sea'...I might have believed it in 1948, but in 2008? Not buying it! Israel is by far the mightiest country in the Middle East, it faces no threat from any of its neighbours. It's a NUCLEAR POWER for crying out loud, so the furore over Iran is...just a little hypocritical.
Israel is a racist state, that's evident when you look at their immigration policy, their politics, their attitude towards non-Jews, especially Arabs who irony of all ironies, whatever you think of them, are the true natives on Palestinian soil.
At this point it becomes necessary to tackle one of the pervasive myths about Arabs in Western civilisation; that they want to take you over, or that if you support the Palestinians, you somehow are inviting your country to be taken over by Muslims. Really, that's the level of insanity and brainwashing we have reached in the West, and we have to admit that we have been conned.
First of all, let's deal with the "threat" of Muslim immigrants. They wouldn't be so numerous if the government didn't let so many in and purposefully let them stay. Not to say that Muslims are somehow a problem, far from it; our government makes the immigration problem by deliberately paying welfare to immigrants. If the taps were turned off, it wouldn't matter if 100 million Arabs lived in the UK, because it wouldn't cost other citizens a penny in tax, and the economy would benefit. Also, less would bring their families over; rather only the productive would come to work and send money back home; a win-win situation. The point is that government makes the immigrant problem, not the immigrants themselves.
The idea that "Muslims are out to get you" seems irrational. Not least because the people who really are getting you are behind the world's central banks (their mechanism for fraud) and I can tell you, they may be satanic, atheist, masonic, whatever; they aren't Arab or Muslim, I'll say that for sure. Also, 9/11 was indeed an inside job, pinned on the Al-CIAda patsy Bin Laden (do I really need to repeat this stuff?) The 7/7 story, while there is less substance on what happened, reeks of bull too. Al-Qaeda is not under your bed. The Mossad, however, may just be tapping your telephone.
Divide and Conquer is all over us again. We have been had. It's the Jews! It's the Muslims! It's the Masons or the Catholic Church! It's the left wing, the right wing! All these "groups", are built upon ordinary people who tend to be basically good. The Jew waves the flag of Israel not understanding he stands upon land that was stolen by ethinc cleansing. The Muslim prays facing Mecca while his brethren stone to death a girl in order to preserve "honour". The Obama supporter decries those trying to get them to snap out of their trance as "racist Republicans". None of the above people quite get it, get how they contribute to the evil, because they've been manipulated so badly that they refuse to accept the humiliation of it, so they double down on their bets (also known as drinking the Koolaid) and froth hatred at everyone else.
The point of all this is that evil people manipulate, and manipulators rise to the top in society. Human nature sucks, doesn't it? Thus, honest people will always have an uphill struggle maintaining some semblance of justice in authority, and this requires them to try and disentangle the webs the elites weave, to see the truth. Not an easy task. In this context, it is easy to get trapped down oversimplistic lines - 'liberal', 'conservative', black, white, Jew, Christian, Muslim.
These doctrines serve as a great benefit to the elite, for now all you little people can waste your time fighting each other instead of paying attention to your rulers. They built their World Government hidden in plain sight, only now however is it being rolled out. It's already been here for sixty years (UN/IMF), minus the global taxes that will come soon. This tyranny will be defeated by patriots, free humans the world over, mysteriously of all races and faiths. Because the defining factor uniting them will be good, and a hatred towards evil. Sometimes it's good to discriminate.
Monday, 13 April 2009
Stench of Cover-up over G20 death
If you aren't familiar with the story surrounding the death of Ian Tomlinson, it's summed up here and here.
Guardian: Pathologist in Ian Tomlinson G20 death case was reprimanded over conduct
Home Office pathologist Dr Freddy Patel concluded Tomlinson had died of a heart attack. He has previously been reprimanded by the GMC, after he released medical details about a man who died controversially in police custody.
In a second case, which raised questions about Dr Patel's findings, police dropped a criminal investigation after the pathologist gave it as his opinion that the victim, a woman, had died of natural causes. A man who lived in the flat where the body was found went on to murder two other women and mutilate their bodies.
Another detail about the officer responsible for the (IMO) manslaughter of Tomlinson is that he had removed his epaulettes with the ID number on. This might indicate the incident was planned; another possibility is that they were removed with the general intent to avoid accountability for anything that may happen. Still another possibility is that the epaulettes were torn off either during the police operation by protestors (unlikely) or beforehand by officers to prevent that from happening. The latter seems unlikely because it's part of the riot police uniform, it would be designed with that in mind. Speculation, unfortunately, is as good as it gets on this one, but it would be no surprise if the officers had removed their IDs beforehand to avoid accountablilty for anything that may happen.
What will become of this incident? Well, they may have made a poor choice for pathologist, but it's likely the death by heart attack will be found by whoever is doing the second autopsy. That's not to suggest Tomlinson didn't die of a heart attack, he probably did; but even if he didn't, that's what I would expect would be the finding.
The officer will be shielded by the IPCC and his buddies, the incident will go down in the MSM (if it gets mentioned at all) as an unfortunate accident that can be blamed on the protestors. After all, if they hadn't been there excercising free speech, police wouldn't have been forced to assault anyone, right? (How's that for apologist logic?)
Guardian: Pathologist in Ian Tomlinson G20 death case was reprimanded over conduct
Home Office pathologist Dr Freddy Patel concluded Tomlinson had died of a heart attack. He has previously been reprimanded by the GMC, after he released medical details about a man who died controversially in police custody.
In a second case, which raised questions about Dr Patel's findings, police dropped a criminal investigation after the pathologist gave it as his opinion that the victim, a woman, had died of natural causes. A man who lived in the flat where the body was found went on to murder two other women and mutilate their bodies.
Another detail about the officer responsible for the (IMO) manslaughter of Tomlinson is that he had removed his epaulettes with the ID number on. This might indicate the incident was planned; another possibility is that they were removed with the general intent to avoid accountability for anything that may happen. Still another possibility is that the epaulettes were torn off either during the police operation by protestors (unlikely) or beforehand by officers to prevent that from happening. The latter seems unlikely because it's part of the riot police uniform, it would be designed with that in mind. Speculation, unfortunately, is as good as it gets on this one, but it would be no surprise if the officers had removed their IDs beforehand to avoid accountablilty for anything that may happen.
What will become of this incident? Well, they may have made a poor choice for pathologist, but it's likely the death by heart attack will be found by whoever is doing the second autopsy. That's not to suggest Tomlinson didn't die of a heart attack, he probably did; but even if he didn't, that's what I would expect would be the finding.
The officer will be shielded by the IPCC and his buddies, the incident will go down in the MSM (if it gets mentioned at all) as an unfortunate accident that can be blamed on the protestors. After all, if they hadn't been there excercising free speech, police wouldn't have been forced to assault anyone, right? (How's that for apologist logic?)
Sunday, 12 April 2009
Jeff Rense Show, guest Gerald Celente
My addiction to American talk radio is confirmed. Also, you may first like to see this hit piece against Celente and Peter Schiff, accusing them of 'pessimism porn'.
Alan Colmes Show, guest Alex Jones
The main reason I blogged this was for the caller who referred to himself as a "Dick Cheney Republican". No offence, but the stereotype about 'hicktown America' isn't totally undeserved; people like him have caused it.
Well, at least he's human.
Daily Mail - Officer in G20 protest death signs off sick 'following heart attack'
The policeman suspended over the death of a G20 protester in London has been signed off sick - following a suspected heart attack.
The officer, from the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Support Group (TSG), collapsed at his home after realising he was the person captured on film allegedly pushing newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson to the ground.
Mr Tomlinson, 47, is thought to have died of a heart attack.
"After realising he was the person captured on film". As in, he didn't remember pushing him to the ground and didn't notice that it was the same man who subsequently died? How many people did the police assault for him not to realise it was he who caused the death? I for one am not buying it, he damn well knew what he had done as soon as it happened.
That said, he is obviously regretting what he had done. Well it's too late now isn't it? Maybe if you hadn't been drunk on power and looking for trouble on the day this wouldn't have happened!
The way in which the police try to set off violence is the most dangerous thing of all about protests in this climate. Make no mistake, they want a riot.
The main image of the G20 protests is the so-called 'anarchists' smashing that window. Strangely there were no police around to stop that incident, however there were a ring of reporters and photographers (look at the footage again if you don't believe me). Why it's almost as if the police let it happen and the reporters knew about it beforehand.
I would be willing to bet that the 'anarchists' (who give real anarchists a bad name, in my opinion) were either police, some other government workers, and/or were being paid to break that window. It's always the same with the agents provocateurs.
It would be nice to focus on the criminal government and shadow government, but the media is feeding us lashings of violence instead, so we may be distracted from the systemic flaws of our big government society.
So, the moral of the story? Don't 'just follow orders'! Don't be a sheep! The endgame is martial law, all-out war between police and military, and the people. (This will ensure the survival of the criminal government.) They are trying to provoke this, and responsibility falls to everyone, whether behind the shields or in front of them so to speak, to prevent what the elites want from becoming a reality.
The policeman suspended over the death of a G20 protester in London has been signed off sick - following a suspected heart attack.The officer, from the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Support Group (TSG), collapsed at his home after realising he was the person captured on film allegedly pushing newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson to the ground.
Mr Tomlinson, 47, is thought to have died of a heart attack.
"After realising he was the person captured on film". As in, he didn't remember pushing him to the ground and didn't notice that it was the same man who subsequently died? How many people did the police assault for him not to realise it was he who caused the death? I for one am not buying it, he damn well knew what he had done as soon as it happened.
That said, he is obviously regretting what he had done. Well it's too late now isn't it? Maybe if you hadn't been drunk on power and looking for trouble on the day this wouldn't have happened!
The way in which the police try to set off violence is the most dangerous thing of all about protests in this climate. Make no mistake, they want a riot.
The main image of the G20 protests is the so-called 'anarchists' smashing that window. Strangely there were no police around to stop that incident, however there were a ring of reporters and photographers (look at the footage again if you don't believe me). Why it's almost as if the police let it happen and the reporters knew about it beforehand.
I would be willing to bet that the 'anarchists' (who give real anarchists a bad name, in my opinion) were either police, some other government workers, and/or were being paid to break that window. It's always the same with the agents provocateurs.
It would be nice to focus on the criminal government and shadow government, but the media is feeding us lashings of violence instead, so we may be distracted from the systemic flaws of our big government society.
So, the moral of the story? Don't 'just follow orders'! Don't be a sheep! The endgame is martial law, all-out war between police and military, and the people. (This will ensure the survival of the criminal government.) They are trying to provoke this, and responsibility falls to everyone, whether behind the shields or in front of them so to speak, to prevent what the elites want from becoming a reality.
Navy raid on pirates, US Captain freed
Phew, some good news; the Captain taken hostage by Somali pirates has been freed after a raid by the US Navy. (SEALs? Never mind, we'll never know.) Three pirates killed, one injured, that's all that is being reported at the minute.
Obama surrounded by crime and low-lifes?
Telegraph - President's half-brother denied entry to Britain
One of President Obama's half-brothers was denied entry to Britain because he had been accused of sexual assault on a previous visit.
It seems like his entire cabinet are tax evaders. His administration is complicit to lobbyists, Zionists and the financial elite. Now his half-brother is a suspected sex offender...
Should I be surprised? Well, let's take a look at recent history in the White House:
- The Bush family. Made a lot of money from oil; nothing wrong with that; but their original fortune was made trading with the Nazis.
- The Clinton family. Their links to crime in Arkansas are horrific, with many instances of 'suicides' by people with connections to the Clintons. "The Clinton Body Count"
And now the Chicago mafia is in the White House. See no evil, hear no evil.
One of President Obama's half-brothers was denied entry to Britain because he had been accused of sexual assault on a previous visit.
It seems like his entire cabinet are tax evaders. His administration is complicit to lobbyists, Zionists and the financial elite. Now his half-brother is a suspected sex offender...Should I be surprised? Well, let's take a look at recent history in the White House:
- The Bush family. Made a lot of money from oil; nothing wrong with that; but their original fortune was made trading with the Nazis.
- The Clinton family. Their links to crime in Arkansas are horrific, with many instances of 'suicides' by people with connections to the Clintons. "The Clinton Body Count"
And now the Chicago mafia is in the White House. See no evil, hear no evil.
Bird flu reportedly transported by Dept Homeland Security
What do you think? It's anecdotal evidence, sure, but why make such a complex lie?
It's impossible to know what was in the containers or why the drivers were paid so much for transportation - if they indeed were. That's the wonder of uncertainty. But at the same time, this would be unsurprising in the context of other DHS activity such as the infamous FEMA camps.
It's impossible to know what was in the containers or why the drivers were paid so much for transportation - if they indeed were. That's the wonder of uncertainty. But at the same time, this would be unsurprising in the context of other DHS activity such as the infamous FEMA camps.
Friday, 10 April 2009
Oath Keepers at Lexington Green
Oath Keepers are having a gathering of military, police and citizens, to swear their oath to the Constitution on Lexington Green on 19 April, the anniversary of the first shots of the Revolutionary War.
You may recognise the voice on the second video as being that of "July4Patriot", whose previous videos I have blogged here and here.
You may recognise the voice on the second video as being that of "July4Patriot", whose previous videos I have blogged here and here.
What does a trillion dollars look like?
Video that helps you appreciate the scale of the bailouts and other spending.
BTW Latest figure for the Bank Bailout, as reported in Bloomberg:
$12.8 TRILLION. By contrast the entire US GDP for 2008 is $14.2 trillion. They've stolen your entire GDP nearly.
Get your head around that much money. And remember, money isn't wealth in itself, just a store of wealth. A store that is going to become increasingly unsafe as this new money starts impacting the ecconomy. And we're not immune this side of the Atlantic either.
BTW Latest figure for the Bank Bailout, as reported in Bloomberg:
$12.8 TRILLION. By contrast the entire US GDP for 2008 is $14.2 trillion. They've stolen your entire GDP nearly.
Get your head around that much money. And remember, money isn't wealth in itself, just a store of wealth. A store that is going to become increasingly unsafe as this new money starts impacting the ecconomy. And we're not immune this side of the Atlantic either.
The BNP: A threat?
Compared to our mainstream parties, I don't think so.
Independent: The BNP are now a bigger threat than ever
Labour is facing its biggest threat from the BNP, Harriet Harman admits today, as the party gears up to prevent the far right group from winning its first seats in nationwide elections this June for the European Parliament.
In an interview with The Independent Ms Harman, the Leader of the Commons, who is heading Labour's election effort in in her role as the party's chairman and deputy leader, said Labour was launching its biggest-ever campaign targeting the BNP. "It is a worry," she said. "Certainly they [the BNP] are a bigger threat than they have been before."
Labour fears the BNP could land two or three seats in the European elections, which are fought under a proportional representation (PR) system based on huge regional constituencies. Labour believes the BNP threat is greatest in the North West, where its leader, Nick Griffin, is a candidate; Yorkshire and the Humber and the East and West Midlands.
'We are telling people to come out and vote or they will let the BNP in,' says Harriet Harman.
(um...that's an encouragement to excercise democratic rights, and not a threat...right, Ms Harman?)
First of all, let's get the false left-right distinction out of the equation. The BNP have many socialist/interventionist economic policies, thus they only fit the criteria of being 'right wing' in terms of them being closet Aryan supremacists.
That said, they are a legitimate political party and should not be treated as a 'threat' by the MSM. So long as they advocate changing the law, and changing the law alone, they have every right to compete for popular opinion alongside every other party.
Have fun reading their platform here - you almost agree with them until you remember where they came from. No such politically correct speak in the NF. And I don't like using PC attitude to dismiss a message - it feels wrong - but from what I know first and second hand about the party...I'll just say I don't think they are as politically correct as their message.
Also, I often notice that nobody calls out the Labour party when they accuse the BNP of being dangerous. Looked in the mirror much lately, INGSOC?
More and more the BNP make me wonder if they aren't Labour affiliated; after all, they are the best hope Labour has in succeeding next election. Unite against fascism! (under the INGSOC Labour banner!)
The Hope Opiate
Marx said religion was the opiate of the people. Well this religion certainly is.
British readers, doesn't this remind you of the ridiculous 'green shoots' statement?
Press Association: Obama sees glimmers of hope for US economy
The US economy is showing "glimmers of hope" despite continuing stresses, President Barack Obama said as he signalled more steps to improve the business climate.
He made his comments to reporters after a meeting at the White House with members of his economic team, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, economic adviser Larry Summers and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke.
"What we're starting to see is glimmers of hope across the economy," he said, although he also noted that the economy is "still under severe stress".
Mr Obama said there had been a significant rise in the number of homeowners seeking to refinance their mortgages, which will put money back into their pockets.
He said a 20% increase last month in the Small Business Administration's largest programme means that small companies, often prized as the backbone of the economy, "are starting to get money".
But he also pointed to the high rate of unemployment - which climbed to a 25-year high of 8.5% in March - and acknowledged that "we've still got a lot of work to do".
"We're starting to see progress," he declared, "and if we stick with it, if we don't flinch in the face of some difficulties, then I feel absolutely convinced that we are going to get this economy back on track."
Hope. Ahem.
Maybe you want a little bit more substantial information, here is a good post at Campaign for Liberty explaining the truth about the economic crisis.
British readers, doesn't this remind you of the ridiculous 'green shoots' statement?
Press Association: Obama sees glimmers of hope for US economyThe US economy is showing "glimmers of hope" despite continuing stresses, President Barack Obama said as he signalled more steps to improve the business climate.
He made his comments to reporters after a meeting at the White House with members of his economic team, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, economic adviser Larry Summers and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke.
"What we're starting to see is glimmers of hope across the economy," he said, although he also noted that the economy is "still under severe stress".
Mr Obama said there had been a significant rise in the number of homeowners seeking to refinance their mortgages, which will put money back into their pockets.
He said a 20% increase last month in the Small Business Administration's largest programme means that small companies, often prized as the backbone of the economy, "are starting to get money".
But he also pointed to the high rate of unemployment - which climbed to a 25-year high of 8.5% in March - and acknowledged that "we've still got a lot of work to do".
"We're starting to see progress," he declared, "and if we stick with it, if we don't flinch in the face of some difficulties, then I feel absolutely convinced that we are going to get this economy back on track."
Hope. Ahem.
Maybe you want a little bit more substantial information, here is a good post at Campaign for Liberty explaining the truth about the economic crisis.
A revolutionary solution to piracy...
Stop preventing crews from arming themselves. Teach them to use a rifle.
Phew, that was quite an effort writing such a complex solution as that. It's definitely better than the one the UN is giving us, the new Law of the Sea.
Echoes of PNAC?
CNAS is the Center for a New American Security. Founded in 2007, its stated goal is to develop "strong, pragmatic and principled National Security and Defense policies".
I doubt they'll mention a "New Pearl Harbor" again though.
I doubt they'll mention a "New Pearl Harbor" again though.
Thursday, 9 April 2009
The Government is Already Geo-Engineering
Lots of detail on the chemtrail reality:
http://www.infowars.com/the-government-is-already-geo-engineering-the-environment/
And now for some pretty pictures, just because I can.
http://www.infowars.com/the-government-is-already-geo-engineering-the-environment/
And now for some pretty pictures, just because I can.
Credit to Flickr users WhiteIron and Lorri37
Related posts:
Chinese Cloud Seeding
Chemtrail Cinema
AP: Obama looks at climate engineering
The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency
The author mocks those who are against world government.
From The Telegraph
A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order.
"We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity," it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.
In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.
NO, the 'conspiracy theorists' and any other rational freedom-loving people out there will hate it! And, unless you think the wolves of the New World Order will pass you by, so should you!
Posters to keep the sheep in line
Enjoy, or rather don't, these new 'anti-terror' 1984-style, tell-on-your-neighbour campaigns.
First: shows a bin filled with chemical containers, caption says "These chemicals won't be used in a bomb because a neighbour reported the dumped containers to the Anti-Terrorist Hotline."
Second: shows people sitting and walking about in a normal town scene (with a CCTV camera overhead), caption says "A bomb won't go off here because weeks before a shopper reported someone studying the CCTV cameras."
The slogan on both posters: "Don't rely on others. If you suspect it, report it."
Just when you thought fear mongering about terrroism went away...it's back baby. East German Stasi revisited.
Take your shot...or this happens
BBC - Mumps cases 'on the rise' again
Look. I'm not saying that mumps is awesome. It doesn't sound like fun to have swelled salivary glands and find it painful to eat and drink. But that we should take a vaccine to prevent this, a vaccine proven to be connected to cases of autism...I'm sorry but I just don't agree.
Mumps isn't gonna kill you. Vaccines, on the other hand...well let's just say they don't have a great track record of either success or safety.
Related posts:
Did Vaccines Really Save Us?
ONLY the vaccinated died from Spanish flu?
Vaccine revolt in Ukraine
Cervical cancer jab - please...just don't.
Look. I'm not saying that mumps is awesome. It doesn't sound like fun to have swelled salivary glands and find it painful to eat and drink. But that we should take a vaccine to prevent this, a vaccine proven to be connected to cases of autism...I'm sorry but I just don't agree.
Mumps isn't gonna kill you. Vaccines, on the other hand...well let's just say they don't have a great track record of either success or safety.
Related posts:
Did Vaccines Really Save Us?
ONLY the vaccinated died from Spanish flu?
Vaccine revolt in Ukraine
Cervical cancer jab - please...just don't.
Cenk Uygur blames Fox News for ADHD Shooter
I won't ever defend Fox News on charges of journalistic integrity. However, to suggest that news media (read: free speech) causes shootings, is truly warped.
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
Obama's First 100 Days: they really meant it
I'm sure anyone paying attention to all the freedom-grabbing going on, especially but not exclusively in America, has noticed the crazy speed at which everything is proceeding since Obama was inaugurated. I have only been blogging on this for three months, but I can vouch for the vast speed at which information is being revealed post-Jan 20.
I suppose all the fanfare about Obama's First 100 Days was 'their' way of letting us know they weren't going to mess about once he entered office...well they weren't kidding, were they?
The New World Order, as KRS-One said, simply put on a black face with the (s)election of Obama. The fact that this so easily diverted everyone's attention, shows how the dumbing down has worked. But something is happening, many of the people who backed Obama have recognised that he hasn't really stopped many of the things they didn't like about Bush, rather he has intensified them.
I considered listing everything here; but what's the point? All you need to know is that everything is going to hell in a handbasket (love a good cliche), as the bankers push martial law and full-on tyranny in order to cover their own backs as they make off with their ill-gotten bailout gains.
Something that really creeps me out, is the honesty...I first heard of the NWO a little over a year ago, but it took eleven months to wake me up, primarily because there was so little direct in-your-face unavoidable evidence. So long as you stuck to the MSM, you wouldn't know any better. Now, however, the cloak has been thrown off, and the naked evil is being revealed to the people. Not entirely of course, but now the elite seem to take pleasure from bragging about what they are doing.
In a way this is more unsettling than if they were trying to stay out of sight; it reminds us of the late hour which we are in. Maybe these tidbits are helping to wake people up; maybe they're trying to panic their viewers into starting an armed revolt such that martial law can be brought in. I don't know what the game is, it doesn't add up. Then again, these people are drunk on power, it could be arrogance - impossible to tell.
I suppose all the fanfare about Obama's First 100 Days was 'their' way of letting us know they weren't going to mess about once he entered office...well they weren't kidding, were they?The New World Order, as KRS-One said, simply put on a black face with the (s)election of Obama. The fact that this so easily diverted everyone's attention, shows how the dumbing down has worked. But something is happening, many of the people who backed Obama have recognised that he hasn't really stopped many of the things they didn't like about Bush, rather he has intensified them.
I considered listing everything here; but what's the point? All you need to know is that everything is going to hell in a handbasket (love a good cliche), as the bankers push martial law and full-on tyranny in order to cover their own backs as they make off with their ill-gotten bailout gains.
Something that really creeps me out, is the honesty...I first heard of the NWO a little over a year ago, but it took eleven months to wake me up, primarily because there was so little direct in-your-face unavoidable evidence. So long as you stuck to the MSM, you wouldn't know any better. Now, however, the cloak has been thrown off, and the naked evil is being revealed to the people. Not entirely of course, but now the elite seem to take pleasure from bragging about what they are doing.
In a way this is more unsettling than if they were trying to stay out of sight; it reminds us of the late hour which we are in. Maybe these tidbits are helping to wake people up; maybe they're trying to panic their viewers into starting an armed revolt such that martial law can be brought in. I don't know what the game is, it doesn't add up. Then again, these people are drunk on power, it could be arrogance - impossible to tell.
Stephen Jones tells '911 debunkers' to put up or shut up!
Note: It kind of dawned on me, while reading this, that in many ways the scientific debate on 9/11 is now over, at least when it comes to the demolition debate. I'm just so used to seeing Popular Mechanics or a mainstream media reporter dismiss all allegations of 'inside job' with (in addition to the gratuitous ad hominem attacks) almost plausible logic that is usually just enough to appease the minds of the viewer...I almost can't believe we are now at a point where fire induced collapse can't even be a vague possibility any more. That is something big, maybe terrifying for some, but big.
April 7 2009
April 7 2009 Steven Jones
Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, Science has proceeded through the publication of peer-reviewed papers. Peer-review means a thorough reading, commentary and even challenge before publication by "peers", that is, other PhD's and professors. This paper was thoroughly peer-reviewed with several pages of tough comments that required of our team MONTHS of additional experiments and studies. It was the toughest peer-review I've ever had, including THREE papers for which I was first author in NATURE. (Please note that Prof. Harrit is first author on this paper.) We sought an established journal that would allow us a LONG paper (this paper is 25 pages long) with MANY COLOR IMAGES AND GRAPHS. Such a scientific journal is not easy to find. Page charges are common for scientific journals these days, and are typically paid by the University of the first or second author (as is the case with this paper) or by an external grant.
A peer-reviewed journal is also called a "refereed" journal. Peer-reviewers are almost always anonymous for scientific publications like this -- that is standard in the scientific world. While authors commonly recommend potential peer-reviewers, editors choose the referees and usually pick at least one or two reviewers that the authors did NOT mention -- and that is almost certainly the case with this paper (based on commentary we received from the reviewers). In the end, all the reviewers -- who were selected by the editor(s) -- approved publication. Thus, the paper was subjected to peer review by the editor or editors, and it passed the peer-review process.
Debunkers may raise all sorts of objections on forums, such as "Oh, it's just paint" or "the aluminum is bound up in kaolin." We have answered those questions in the paper, and shown them to be nonsense, but you have to read to find the answers. I may also provide answers here and in emails, often quoting from the paper to show that the answers are already in it.
Here's what you need to know (especially if you are not a scientist): UNLESS AN OBJECTOR ACTUALLY PUBLISHES HIS OR HER OBJECTION IN A PEER-REVIEWED ESTABLISHED JOURNAL (yes that would include Bentham Scientific journals), THEN THE OBJECTION IS NOT CONSIDERED SERIOUS IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. YOU SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT NON-PUBLISHED OBJECTIONS EITHER.
So how do you, as a non-scientist, discern whether the arguments are valid or not? You should first ask, "is the objection PUBLISHED in an ESTABLISHED PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL?" If not, you can and should say -- "I will wait to see this formally published in a refereed scientific journal. Until then, the published peer-reviewed work by Harrit et al. stands."
BTW, there also has been no PUBLISHED REFEREED paper yet that counters either the "Fourteen Points" paper or the "Environmental Anomalies" papers we published last year.IF it is so easy to publish in Bentham Scientific journals, or if these are "vanity publications" (note: there is no factual basis for these charges) -- then why don't the objectors write up their objections and get them peer-reviewed and published?? The fact is, it is not easy, as serious objectors will find out.
Our results have passed the gauntlet of peer-review (including in this case, review at BYU consistent with the fact that there are two authors from BYU).
We say that this paper has the "imprimatur of peer-review". That is a significant breakthrough. You cannot say that of big-foot or Elvis sightings... We are now in a different world from such things, the world of the published scientific community. CAN YOU APPRECIATE THE DIFFERENCE? I hope so. And this is what has our opponents so worried IMO...
More info: 9/11 - The Loaded Gun - Red/Grey Nanothermite Chips
(The above article borrowed from Debunking the Debunkers)
In particular, this silences a criticism I have personally read a few times, that there is a lack of peer-reviewed material supporting the controlled demolition hypothesis - I recall someone sneering that only the "weak-ass" Fourteen Points had been published in a scientific journal. Well, no more, debunkers. Your ad hominem insults and accusations of 'crazy' have kept people in line for a while; but, thanks to honest experts like Stephen Jones and Richard Gage, the truth is coming out. With truth, there can be peace, and liberty once again may reign over tyranny.
The Obama Haze IS Clearing
Slowly but surely. Only 30% of msnbc.com's audience give him an 'A', while 44% give him an 'F'.
Live Vote
If you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get? * 1882667 responses
He gets an A 30%
He gets a B 6.3%
He gets a C 5.4%
He gets a D 14%
He gets an F 44%
Click here to go to the poll
Live VoteIf you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get? * 1882667 responses
He gets an A 30%
He gets a B 6.3%
He gets a C 5.4%
He gets a D 14%
He gets an F 44%
Click here to go to the poll
AP: Obama Looks At Climate Engineering
This is an unbelieveable out-in-the-open admission.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The president's new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth's air.
John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.
"It's got to be looked at," he said. "We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table."
Holdren outlined several "tipping points" involving global warming that could be fast approaching. Once such milestones are reached, such as complete loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic, it increases chances of "really intolerable consequences," he said.
Twice in a half-hour interview, Holdren compared global warming to being "in a car with bad brakes driving toward a cliff in the fog."
At first, Holdren characterized the potential need to technologically tinker with the climate as just his personal view. However, he went on to say he has raised it in administration discussions.
Holdren, a 65-year-old physicist, is far from alone in taking geoengineering more seriously. The National Academy of Science is making climate tinkering the subject of its first workshop in its new multidiscipline climate challenges program. The British parliament has also discussed the idea.
The American Meteorological Society is crafting a policy statement on geoengineering that says "it is prudent to consider geoengineering's potential, to understand its limits and to avoid rash deployment."
Last week, Princeton scientist Robert Socolow told the National Academy that geoengineering should be an available option in case climate worsens dramatically.
But Holdren noted that shooting particles into the air — making an artificial volcano as one Nobel laureate has suggested — could have grave side effects and would not completely solve all the problems from soaring greenhouse gas emissions. So such actions could not be taken lightly, he said.
Still, "we might get desperate enough to want to use it," he added.
Ooh la la, Chemtrails are now suggested as something which will save us from global warming! That is testament to the insanity of our times, and the blatancy with which the elites conduct themselves today.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The president's new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth's air.
John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.
"It's got to be looked at," he said. "We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table."
Holdren outlined several "tipping points" involving global warming that could be fast approaching. Once such milestones are reached, such as complete loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic, it increases chances of "really intolerable consequences," he said.
Twice in a half-hour interview, Holdren compared global warming to being "in a car with bad brakes driving toward a cliff in the fog."
At first, Holdren characterized the potential need to technologically tinker with the climate as just his personal view. However, he went on to say he has raised it in administration discussions.
Holdren, a 65-year-old physicist, is far from alone in taking geoengineering more seriously. The National Academy of Science is making climate tinkering the subject of its first workshop in its new multidiscipline climate challenges program. The British parliament has also discussed the idea.
The American Meteorological Society is crafting a policy statement on geoengineering that says "it is prudent to consider geoengineering's potential, to understand its limits and to avoid rash deployment."
Last week, Princeton scientist Robert Socolow told the National Academy that geoengineering should be an available option in case climate worsens dramatically.
But Holdren noted that shooting particles into the air — making an artificial volcano as one Nobel laureate has suggested — could have grave side effects and would not completely solve all the problems from soaring greenhouse gas emissions. So such actions could not be taken lightly, he said.
Still, "we might get desperate enough to want to use it," he added.
Ooh la la, Chemtrails are now suggested as something which will save us from global warming! That is testament to the insanity of our times, and the blatancy with which the elites conduct themselves today.
Government wants to order us what to eat
The Food Standards Agency are insisting on fast food chains putting calorie numbers on their menus.
(Image: If I want to eat it, I'll eat it. If I don't, I won't.)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5120961/I-recommend-the-salad-sir---you-could-do-with-losing-a-few-pounds.html
This is complex. First of all, it's obvious that government has no right to even get close to doing this.
Second, what this and other 'healthy lifestyle messages' does, is that it gives the impression that fat/calories are the root of all evil. Not only do we need fat (not saturated/hydrogenated of course), but other ingredients in our food are more harmful for health, eg pesticides or High Fructose Corn Syrup (a common sweetener which contains mercury).
Fast food has been found to be 'as addictive as heroin'. It's more to do with the sugar content, and artificial ingredients, than it is to do with calories per se.
Big Brother is everywhere. I was reading another news article today, and I was reminded by a TV Licensing ad: "Not paid your TV Licence? We already know. Everything is in our database". To hell with their circuit boards and enslavement grid.
News on the latest Riot Gear Murder
Turns out, the man who 'died of a heart attack' at the G20 protests, had been assaulted from behind by riot gear moments before his death.
Look. It isn't truthful to say that any police investigation will be anything other than a cover for the scum who assaulted this citizen from behind. At the same time, however, it would be much more productive for the elite if we were then to declare all police the enemy of the people, and start lynching cops.
They want us to be played off against each other, and incidents like these are very helpful to them. If it succeeds, and we are pitched against our own military and police, there's no victory in sight; at least not in (mostly) disarmed Britain. It doesn't have to happen like this.
We need to unite with the military and police; it's a game of hearts and minds. If we can unite, and have the uniforms of this country siding with the people, then martial law, and so on, can be averted.
US Marine: "Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me DEATH!"
You may recognise the masked Marine in this video from an earlier video entitled "Military Joining the American Resistance", which I posted here.
He is a hero and an inspiration to military and citizens alike. The spirit of resistance lives.
Visit http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/ to see a growing collection of testaments from soldiers, police etc who are keeping their oath to protect and defend their Constitution.
He is a hero and an inspiration to military and citizens alike. The spirit of resistance lives.
Visit http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/ to see a growing collection of testaments from soldiers, police etc who are keeping their oath to protect and defend their Constitution.
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
Loans to carmakers...in Euros
Now what few carmakers still operate here will be indebted to the European Investment Fund. "Too big to fail" yet again, but hell, at least bail them out in our own currency!
(Image: Fiat money! Yaaaay! I could get all my Monopoly money and use it to buy real assets; after all, what difference is there?)
The loans have been awarded to finance the development of more fuel-efficient cars but come as a much-needed boost for the industry as sales tumble in the recession.
Tremendous. And, in particular, call me an uber-Eurosceptic, but I'm not happy with it being done in Euros. If the globalists determine that we 'need' to be part of the Euro, they'll collapse the Pound, and while in the short term that doesn't seem too likely, it's still annoying that British companies will now be paying back debt to Europe. This sets a precedent.
(Image: Fiat money! Yaaaay! I could get all my Monopoly money and use it to buy real assets; after all, what difference is there?)Telegraph: Europe rides to rescue of Jaguar Land Rover and Nissan
The loans have been awarded to finance the development of more fuel-efficient cars but come as a much-needed boost for the industry as sales tumble in the recession.
Tremendous. And, in particular, call me an uber-Eurosceptic, but I'm not happy with it being done in Euros. If the globalists determine that we 'need' to be part of the Euro, they'll collapse the Pound, and while in the short term that doesn't seem too likely, it's still annoying that British companies will now be paying back debt to Europe. This sets a precedent.
Monday, 6 April 2009
Glenn Beck's debunking: Debunked!
OK so first of all, Fox host Glenn Beck claimed there was no evidence for FEMA camps, and an 'expert' from Popular Mechanics (the same people behind a certain other memorable hit job) was going to show that there were no detainment centres being constructed and that FEMA camps were a 'classic Internet conspiracy theory'.
So Alex Jones decided to 'pre-debunk' Glenn Beck before his show aired on Fox News yesterday evening. The following is from The Alex Jones Show, shown live on Monday afternoon US time, hours before Beck's broadcast.
Here's a link to part 1; there are 7 parts. I didn't want to show them all here, as it would probably make the page load annoyingly slow.
And yes I know, it's really long (!), so if you don't have an hour to spare I will try to lay out where the key points are.
Video 1
0:00 - 1:20 Introduction: "There's so much evidence"
7:45 - 10:45 The 'secret' government
Video 2
5:25 - 6:25 "You want proof of martial law?"
6:45 - 8:05 Shadow Government power
Video 3
0:00 - 1:00 Nat Guard training with police for civil disturbance - local news report
10:00 - 10:59 PREDICTION of what Glenn Beck will say to 'debunk' FEMA camps
6:00 - 7:00, 8:30 - 9:50 News report: "The government's biggest problem: us"
Video 4
0:00 - 1:15, 8:45-10:57 Net Censorship, FEMA control of media, Should Obama control the Net?
1:45 - 8:00 HR645 (Emergency Centers Establishment Act) and related Executive Orders
Video 5
1:00 - 2:30 More on HR645
3:15 - 5:40 Civilian Inmate Labor Program, Censorship of Web/Criticism
10:00 - 10:59 Military Drills/Checkpoints
Video 6
0:00 - 2:40 Local radio clip about illegal checkpoints in Tennessee
3:30 - 8:30 Running through news stories about domestic military operations, mass graves
Video 7
0:00 - 2:00 'Civilian expeditionary workforce', evidence for Pentagon announcement of what basically amounts to a draft.
Click here for a relevant AJ rant about FEMA camps
So Alex Jones decided to 'pre-debunk' Glenn Beck before his show aired on Fox News yesterday evening. The following is from The Alex Jones Show, shown live on Monday afternoon US time, hours before Beck's broadcast.
Here's a link to part 1; there are 7 parts. I didn't want to show them all here, as it would probably make the page load annoyingly slow.
And yes I know, it's really long (!), so if you don't have an hour to spare I will try to lay out where the key points are.
Video 1
0:00 - 1:20 Introduction: "There's so much evidence"
7:45 - 10:45 The 'secret' government
Video 2
5:25 - 6:25 "You want proof of martial law?"
6:45 - 8:05 Shadow Government power
Video 3
0:00 - 1:00 Nat Guard training with police for civil disturbance - local news report
10:00 - 10:59 PREDICTION of what Glenn Beck will say to 'debunk' FEMA camps
6:00 - 7:00, 8:30 - 9:50 News report: "The government's biggest problem: us"
Video 4
0:00 - 1:15, 8:45-10:57 Net Censorship, FEMA control of media, Should Obama control the Net?
1:45 - 8:00 HR645 (Emergency Centers Establishment Act) and related Executive Orders
Video 5
1:00 - 2:30 More on HR645
3:15 - 5:40 Civilian Inmate Labor Program, Censorship of Web/Criticism
10:00 - 10:59 Military Drills/Checkpoints
Video 6
0:00 - 2:40 Local radio clip about illegal checkpoints in Tennessee
3:30 - 8:30 Running through news stories about domestic military operations, mass graves
Video 7
0:00 - 2:00 'Civilian expeditionary workforce', evidence for Pentagon announcement of what basically amounts to a draft.
Click here for a relevant AJ rant about FEMA camps
Aaron Russo on the World Gov agenda
"I said (to Nick Rockefeller), 'What's the end goal?' And he said, 'The end goal is to get everybody chipped'."
The late Aaron Russo talks to Alex Jones about many facets of the globalist agenda.
The late Aaron Russo talks to Alex Jones about many facets of the globalist agenda.
Sunday, 5 April 2009
The 9/11 Proof finally arrives
Thank you to the scientists who had the courage to go up against power, with truth!
(Image: Honour the dead.)
A scientific paper has been published which found 'superthermite' chips in amongst the WTC dust. Only took seven years for the truth to begin to come out...does it mark a death knell for NIST's defences of the government-invented conspiracy theory?
It won't be reported in the MSM, of course.
Read the paper:
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Various articles on 911research.wtc7.net about this:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/index.html
Mainstream lefty site Raw Story covered it!!! (guess they don't mind their readers thinking Bush did it, could be to make 9/11 truth seem like a lefty thing?)
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
Brought to my attention by esteemed blogs
Debunking the Debunkers,
Connecting the dots in the NWO, and
Conspiracy Scope. Thanks to all.
"But if it was a conspiracy they would have been caught!" - they HAVE been caught. All they've got left to depend on is the masses' comfortable denial, MSM conditioning, and ignorance. We need a genuine investigation into the real terrorists; 3000 families deserve the truth. And justice.
(Image: Honour the dead.)A scientific paper has been published which found 'superthermite' chips in amongst the WTC dust. Only took seven years for the truth to begin to come out...does it mark a death knell for NIST's defences of the government-invented conspiracy theory?
It won't be reported in the MSM, of course.
Read the paper:
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Various articles on 911research.wtc7.net about this:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/index.html
Mainstream lefty site Raw Story covered it!!! (guess they don't mind their readers thinking Bush did it, could be to make 9/11 truth seem like a lefty thing?)
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
Brought to my attention by esteemed blogs
Debunking the Debunkers,
Connecting the dots in the NWO, and
Conspiracy Scope. Thanks to all.
"But if it was a conspiracy they would have been caught!" - they HAVE been caught. All they've got left to depend on is the masses' comfortable denial, MSM conditioning, and ignorance. We need a genuine investigation into the real terrorists; 3000 families deserve the truth. And justice.
Pushing ice cap paranoia with half-truths
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7984054.stm
Enjoy some gold standard shilling.
Ice bridge ruptures in Antarctic
An ice bridge linking a shelf of ice the size of Jamaica to two islands in Antarctica has snapped.
Scientists say the collapse could mean the Wilkins Ice Shelf is on the brink of breaking away, and provides further evidence or rapid change in the region. Sited on the western side of the Antarctic Peninsula, the Wilkins shelf has been retreating since the 1990s. Researchers regarded the ice bridge as an important barrier, holding the remnant shelf structure in place.
Its removal will allow ice to move more freely between Charcot and Latady islands, into the open ocean.
It would be funny if it wasn't so dangerous to peddle what amounts to disinformation. It is clear and undisputed that the overall mass of ice in the Antarctic is not falling; rather, it hit a 30-year HIGH in 2007.
The MSM, however, failed to mention this at all, preferring to focus on the Arctic shelves which are decreasing. But, now that one shelf in the Antarctic is reducing in size, the bandwagon is again looking to the south pole to report on the dangers of 'man-made global warming'.
Big secret...the ice caps change vastly throughout the seasons...they are something like one-third the size in summer as they are in winter. So melting ice, and icebergs, are very much the norm; only, there's no media around to report the boring bit, when it all freezes back over again in winter.
Related posts:
Just watched 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'
Severity of Global Warming 'underestimated'
UK's CO2 plan 'certain to fail'
Climate 'denial' is now a mental disorder
The UN's global green "new deal"
Greens want to slaughter 30 million Brits
Enjoy some gold standard shilling.
Ice bridge ruptures in Antarctic An ice bridge linking a shelf of ice the size of Jamaica to two islands in Antarctica has snapped.
Scientists say the collapse could mean the Wilkins Ice Shelf is on the brink of breaking away, and provides further evidence or rapid change in the region. Sited on the western side of the Antarctic Peninsula, the Wilkins shelf has been retreating since the 1990s. Researchers regarded the ice bridge as an important barrier, holding the remnant shelf structure in place.
Its removal will allow ice to move more freely between Charcot and Latady islands, into the open ocean.
It would be funny if it wasn't so dangerous to peddle what amounts to disinformation. It is clear and undisputed that the overall mass of ice in the Antarctic is not falling; rather, it hit a 30-year HIGH in 2007.
The MSM, however, failed to mention this at all, preferring to focus on the Arctic shelves which are decreasing. But, now that one shelf in the Antarctic is reducing in size, the bandwagon is again looking to the south pole to report on the dangers of 'man-made global warming'.
Big secret...the ice caps change vastly throughout the seasons...they are something like one-third the size in summer as they are in winter. So melting ice, and icebergs, are very much the norm; only, there's no media around to report the boring bit, when it all freezes back over again in winter.
Related posts:
Just watched 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'
Severity of Global Warming 'underestimated'
UK's CO2 plan 'certain to fail'
Climate 'denial' is now a mental disorder
The UN's global green "new deal"
Greens want to slaughter 30 million Brits
Bob Chapman on the end of the dollar and more
On Friday's Alex Jones Show, Jason Bermas sitting in as host.
Saturday, 4 April 2009
Propaganda opportunity not missed by MSM
BBC - Three officers die in US shooting
Apparently, the culprit had "stockpiled food and guns", for "an invasion of the United States". Unsurprisingly, the article misses no opportunity to link together stereotypes of the freedom movement (armament, stockpiling, preparedness) with the act of killing police. Why, it's as if the MIAC Report has been vindicated. Now we must arrest Ron Paul supporters and firearms owners.
Apparently, the culprit had "stockpiled food and guns", for "an invasion of the United States". Unsurprisingly, the article misses no opportunity to link together stereotypes of the freedom movement (armament, stockpiling, preparedness) with the act of killing police. Why, it's as if the MIAC Report has been vindicated. Now we must arrest Ron Paul supporters and firearms owners.
Max Keiser: Bankers are Financial Terrorists
This is on France 24 news. Keiser suggests the people should 'rise up and revolt', also that the bankers should be punished for their 'embezzlement' and 'fraud'.
Shame On You, riot police
Peaceful G20 protestors assaulted by a wall of shields and sticks
They are shouting, first of all "We Won't Fight!", then as they are assaulted, "Shame on You!"
Credit to Connecting the Dots in the New World Order
Of course, if the police understood what was going on (to their families' prosperity as well as everyone else's), they'd about turn, go over to the G20 summit, and clean house. Wishful thinking.
They are shouting, first of all "We Won't Fight!", then as they are assaulted, "Shame on You!"
Credit to Connecting the Dots in the New World Order
Of course, if the police understood what was going on (to their families' prosperity as well as everyone else's), they'd about turn, go over to the G20 summit, and clean house. Wishful thinking.
Friday, 3 April 2009
Art that helps you research the NWO
Flickr is awesome. People who fight tyranny are awesome. As such, people who fight tyranny via Flickr, why they just reek of awesomeness.
Now, you could just google all these things for yourself. Alternatively, click the image to go to its individual page on Flickr; there are loads of notes attached with some useful hyperlinks.
I break down some globalist MSM shilling
I read this and got a little mad. So now we will go point by point and tear this bs to bits, not that it's hard to do.
Daily Mail - Analysis: what the G20 said and what they really meant
PLEDGE ONE:
To restore confidence, growth and jobs through a $5trillion fiscal package
When it comes to budget and summit rhetoric, Gordon Brown remains the master of hyperbole. In reality the $5trillion of tax cuts and public spending that will be pumped into the world economy is not quite the breakthrough it seems.
The problem is that none of it is new money. Nor did the central banks agree to any new easing of interest rates or printing more money yesterday.
So when it comes to additional fiscal and monetary expansion and rate cuts, the G20 was long on rhetoric and short on action.
However, the symbolism of 20 nations lending their support to radical national action should provide a psychological boost.
First of all, Brown is indeed the 'master of hyperbole'. Second, when has government intervention ever restored confidence in the free market? Intervention demonstrates that the state has no confidence in trading, so why should the individual? The New Deal was central to the prolonging of the Great Depression, as was the policy of the Federal Reserve. It's happening again, only worse and on a more international scale.
Also worth noting that the presumption made here is that "new money" would be great. Like all the new money that people got to push around in wheelbarrows in Weimar Germany?
It's noteworthy that the 'symbolic' impact of the G20 did actually have an effect on the stock markets. Even at the very moment when capitalism is being destroyed and world government is beginning...are people shallow enough to be swayed by posing bureaucrats talking about 'getting the economy going again'? For some reason, in spite of all the lies these people have peddled, it still works.
PLEDGE TWO:
To repair the financial system
Leaders agree that if beleaguered banks are not restored to health there is little chance of turning the world economy around. So more measures
to remove ‘toxic assets’ from firms’ balance sheets are clearly needed.
But a reading of yesterday’s G20 communique reveals no concrete measures to repair banks’ finances.
The Europeans have still to own up to the fact their banks played as big a role in the credit explosion as their Anglo-Saxon counterparts.
The G20 has left the job of cleaning up banks to individual countries.
There are real concerns that the U.S. has failed to get to grips with the scale of the problems in American banking.
Here in Britain the insurance scheme for toxic debts does seem to be making a positive impact on confidence. But this was in hand before the summit.
So we're talking 'toxic assets'. Let me assure you that NO plan can ever afford to 'buy this bad debt from banks' or whatever the propaganda li(n)e is. The world's toxic assets (derivatives) total an estimated $1 QUADRILLION ($1000 trillion, or $10000000 billion, that's right a million billion). Higher estimates cite $1.4 Quadrillion, both figures are far beyond the worth of the entre planet. There is NO WAY IN HELL these assets can be bought from their owners, and now all this artificial wealth is collapsing...the derivatives bubble was at the core of the financial meltdown, not so much the housing bubble which regularly gets the blame.
PLEDGE THREE:
To strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust
Countries are pledging to do more to coordinate their regulatory systems, and tighten the oversight of feckless bankers and hedge fund managers who drove the world economy to the brink.
A financial stability board will be created to oversee the world financial system, and a crackdown on tax havens is planned. Much of this work has been in progress since last spring.
There remain doubts as to whether the G20’s bold words will translate into firm measures in national parliaments and are fully adopted by regulators.
If they are, it will mean a shift away from laissez-faire Anglo-Saxon capitalism to the more intrusive model of Continental Europe.
As usual, the bankers cause the crisis then turn their solution, the new regulatory system, against the innocent people and small businesses. 'A more intrusive model'. And you bet the elite will dodge the crackdown on financial havens. Anyway, once they get their world state there won't be a need for tax havens; they will be able to regulate everyone on the planet but themselves.
In a way this has already happened; what people who blame deregulation for the collapse don't understand is that the banksters haven't been doing trade which built up the derivatives bubble; they've clearly been doing fraud. One of those is an ethical fundamental of capitalism; the other is already a crime and should lead to prosecution in an ideal world. More regulation, unless you specifically 'regulate' (ie enforce the law) with the bankers, will not solve anything.
PLEDGE FOUR:
To fund and reform international financial institutions
For a decade as chairman of the IMF’s main policymaking committee, Gordon Brown fought for reform and more funding to assist emerging markets and poor countries. He finally appears to have delivered this at the London summit.
An additional $850billion will be injected into lenders such as the International Monetary Fund in the hope of preventing further meltdowns in developing markets such as Ukraine and smaller advanced economies such as Iceland.
There will also be a shake-up of the IMF to ensure countries such as China get more of a say.
They also decided to expand the use of special drawing rights, the IMF’s ‘currency’. This, in effect, gives the Washington-based fund the right to print money.
But the trouble with these IMF and World Bank reforms is that many have to be ratified by national parliaments.
In the case of the U.S., winning the approval of Congress – with its historic aversion to international institutions – can be an uphill task.
That's right, let's get more poor countries into debt. I wonder how high the compound interest is on those IMF loans...
Looks like we already have a global fiat derivative 'supercurrency', IMF special drawing rights. That webpage claims it's not a currency. What crap, you trade it don't you? Well then...
Also, you've got to love the contempt shown for those damn national parliaments, who might just vote down some of these globalist 'reforms'. Obviously the best way is for globalists to decide above and beyond these obstacles, after all if everything goes to plan that's what they'll be doing in a few years anyway.
PLEDGE FIVE:
Promote global trade and reject protectionism
This is the mantra of every international financial meeting.
In the past few months it has become more urgent as trade barriers go up and many countries pursue more nationalist economic agendas.
Ministers have been deeply alarmed by the collapse in world trade – down by 14 per cent from its peak.
So the G20 is putting forward $250billion to finance global exports and imports and has pledged to avoid protectionism.
But bold words rarely translate into concrete action and many countries, including the U.S., are pursuing ‘Buy America’ style policies.
This beggar-thyneighbourism was disastrous in the 1930s and it is not clear that the G20 has done enough to prevent it happening again.
Personally I favour free trade over protectionism, most but not all of the time. Given the scenario in which we find ourselves, I wouldn't blame any nation for choosing to look after their own. But the imperative here is that individual nations can choose for themselves. You know, that revolutionary idea called self-determination. Not UN or EU determination. Screw them.
What shouldn't happen, and I can't believe I'm standing up for the French here, is nations getting bullied into rejecting 'protectionist' policies; especially when in this case all the French were asking (in return for a bailout may I say) was for the car company in question to guarantee the safety of French jobs in that company.
PLEDGE SIX:
Build an inclusive, green and sustainable recovery
Leaders are promising to ensure that public spending projectsare focused on green investment and are offering $50billion of help to poor states.
Mr Brown is committed to helping Africa and the poorest countries and Britain is now the world’s biggest donor of international aid to alleviate poverty.
Inclusive, green, sustainable. That means nobody can escape; green fascism will force us into neo-Feudalism; and the population will be reduced to such a level as is considered 'sustainable'. See? The globalists have their own language, all I'm doing is providing a translation service.
PLEDGE SEVEN
All of the above pledges were filled with disinfo. Now the real pledge is hereby to restore liberty and destroy the new world order.
(Can you tell which of the pledges wasn't included in the source article?)
What truth does all this disinfo conceal? Well, anyone who still thinks the G20, or government in general, will save them, the only answer to that is no. Stand up, or bend over; the choice is yours.
Daily Mail - Analysis: what the G20 said and what they really meant
PLEDGE ONE:
To restore confidence, growth and jobs through a $5trillion fiscal package
When it comes to budget and summit rhetoric, Gordon Brown remains the master of hyperbole. In reality the $5trillion of tax cuts and public spending that will be pumped into the world economy is not quite the breakthrough it seems.
The problem is that none of it is new money. Nor did the central banks agree to any new easing of interest rates or printing more money yesterday.
So when it comes to additional fiscal and monetary expansion and rate cuts, the G20 was long on rhetoric and short on action.
However, the symbolism of 20 nations lending their support to radical national action should provide a psychological boost.
First of all, Brown is indeed the 'master of hyperbole'. Second, when has government intervention ever restored confidence in the free market? Intervention demonstrates that the state has no confidence in trading, so why should the individual? The New Deal was central to the prolonging of the Great Depression, as was the policy of the Federal Reserve. It's happening again, only worse and on a more international scale.
Also worth noting that the presumption made here is that "new money" would be great. Like all the new money that people got to push around in wheelbarrows in Weimar Germany?
It's noteworthy that the 'symbolic' impact of the G20 did actually have an effect on the stock markets. Even at the very moment when capitalism is being destroyed and world government is beginning...are people shallow enough to be swayed by posing bureaucrats talking about 'getting the economy going again'? For some reason, in spite of all the lies these people have peddled, it still works.
PLEDGE TWO:
To repair the financial system
Leaders agree that if beleaguered banks are not restored to health there is little chance of turning the world economy around. So more measures
to remove ‘toxic assets’ from firms’ balance sheets are clearly needed.
But a reading of yesterday’s G20 communique reveals no concrete measures to repair banks’ finances.
The Europeans have still to own up to the fact their banks played as big a role in the credit explosion as their Anglo-Saxon counterparts.
The G20 has left the job of cleaning up banks to individual countries.
There are real concerns that the U.S. has failed to get to grips with the scale of the problems in American banking.
Here in Britain the insurance scheme for toxic debts does seem to be making a positive impact on confidence. But this was in hand before the summit.
So we're talking 'toxic assets'. Let me assure you that NO plan can ever afford to 'buy this bad debt from banks' or whatever the propaganda li(n)e is. The world's toxic assets (derivatives) total an estimated $1 QUADRILLION ($1000 trillion, or $10000000 billion, that's right a million billion). Higher estimates cite $1.4 Quadrillion, both figures are far beyond the worth of the entre planet. There is NO WAY IN HELL these assets can be bought from their owners, and now all this artificial wealth is collapsing...the derivatives bubble was at the core of the financial meltdown, not so much the housing bubble which regularly gets the blame.
PLEDGE THREE:
To strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust
Countries are pledging to do more to coordinate their regulatory systems, and tighten the oversight of feckless bankers and hedge fund managers who drove the world economy to the brink.
A financial stability board will be created to oversee the world financial system, and a crackdown on tax havens is planned. Much of this work has been in progress since last spring.
There remain doubts as to whether the G20’s bold words will translate into firm measures in national parliaments and are fully adopted by regulators.
If they are, it will mean a shift away from laissez-faire Anglo-Saxon capitalism to the more intrusive model of Continental Europe.
As usual, the bankers cause the crisis then turn their solution, the new regulatory system, against the innocent people and small businesses. 'A more intrusive model'. And you bet the elite will dodge the crackdown on financial havens. Anyway, once they get their world state there won't be a need for tax havens; they will be able to regulate everyone on the planet but themselves.
In a way this has already happened; what people who blame deregulation for the collapse don't understand is that the banksters haven't been doing trade which built up the derivatives bubble; they've clearly been doing fraud. One of those is an ethical fundamental of capitalism; the other is already a crime and should lead to prosecution in an ideal world. More regulation, unless you specifically 'regulate' (ie enforce the law) with the bankers, will not solve anything.
PLEDGE FOUR:
To fund and reform international financial institutions
For a decade as chairman of the IMF’s main policymaking committee, Gordon Brown fought for reform and more funding to assist emerging markets and poor countries. He finally appears to have delivered this at the London summit.
An additional $850billion will be injected into lenders such as the International Monetary Fund in the hope of preventing further meltdowns in developing markets such as Ukraine and smaller advanced economies such as Iceland.
There will also be a shake-up of the IMF to ensure countries such as China get more of a say.
They also decided to expand the use of special drawing rights, the IMF’s ‘currency’. This, in effect, gives the Washington-based fund the right to print money.
But the trouble with these IMF and World Bank reforms is that many have to be ratified by national parliaments.
In the case of the U.S., winning the approval of Congress – with its historic aversion to international institutions – can be an uphill task.
That's right, let's get more poor countries into debt. I wonder how high the compound interest is on those IMF loans...
Looks like we already have a global fiat derivative 'supercurrency', IMF special drawing rights. That webpage claims it's not a currency. What crap, you trade it don't you? Well then...
Also, you've got to love the contempt shown for those damn national parliaments, who might just vote down some of these globalist 'reforms'. Obviously the best way is for globalists to decide above and beyond these obstacles, after all if everything goes to plan that's what they'll be doing in a few years anyway.
PLEDGE FIVE:
Promote global trade and reject protectionism
This is the mantra of every international financial meeting.
In the past few months it has become more urgent as trade barriers go up and many countries pursue more nationalist economic agendas.
Ministers have been deeply alarmed by the collapse in world trade – down by 14 per cent from its peak.
So the G20 is putting forward $250billion to finance global exports and imports and has pledged to avoid protectionism.
But bold words rarely translate into concrete action and many countries, including the U.S., are pursuing ‘Buy America’ style policies.
This beggar-thyneighbourism was disastrous in the 1930s and it is not clear that the G20 has done enough to prevent it happening again.
Personally I favour free trade over protectionism, most but not all of the time. Given the scenario in which we find ourselves, I wouldn't blame any nation for choosing to look after their own. But the imperative here is that individual nations can choose for themselves. You know, that revolutionary idea called self-determination. Not UN or EU determination. Screw them.
What shouldn't happen, and I can't believe I'm standing up for the French here, is nations getting bullied into rejecting 'protectionist' policies; especially when in this case all the French were asking (in return for a bailout may I say) was for the car company in question to guarantee the safety of French jobs in that company.
PLEDGE SIX:
Build an inclusive, green and sustainable recovery
Leaders are promising to ensure that public spending projectsare focused on green investment and are offering $50billion of help to poor states.
Mr Brown is committed to helping Africa and the poorest countries and Britain is now the world’s biggest donor of international aid to alleviate poverty.
Inclusive, green, sustainable. That means nobody can escape; green fascism will force us into neo-Feudalism; and the population will be reduced to such a level as is considered 'sustainable'. See? The globalists have their own language, all I'm doing is providing a translation service.
PLEDGE SEVEN
All of the above pledges were filled with disinfo. Now the real pledge is hereby to restore liberty and destroy the new world order.
(Can you tell which of the pledges wasn't included in the source article?)
What truth does all this disinfo conceal? Well, anyone who still thinks the G20, or government in general, will save them, the only answer to that is no. Stand up, or bend over; the choice is yours.
HR 1207: Audit the Fed!
"In 1950 the law was changed, and it exempted the Federal Reserve from any auditing procedure..."
Ron Paul discusses the growing support for his bill (HR1207: the Federal Reserve Transparency Act) to audit the private Federal Reserve. Funny, if the Fed is doing the right thing to help Americans, then you would think they wouldn't mind letting politicians see what is going on...why so secret?
Thursday, 2 April 2009
FT: "The World Needs an Unbiased Risk Assessor"
Codeword for global government, to enforce global taxation and socialism
Impartial like any of the Western central banks are impartial (impartial to the rule of law that is)? Who would be running this 'impartial' institution? Probably the same people responsible for the whole crisis in the first place of course.
(Image: Trust them?)David Icke called this 'Problem, Reaction, Solution". In other words, they create the problem, anticipate the public's reaction, and offer what they want as a 'solution'. In this case, the depression is the problem, the public reaction is anger towards the banks, so this seemingly validates their solution - an institution to regulate the world economy so no banker can have a tax haven or act in secrecy.
That will work, right? I say no, since regulatory institutions are extremely vulnerable to corruption, and it's inevitable what will happen. The 'crony capitalism' as Ron Paul calls it, ie corruption posing as trade, will flourish. Not to mention the fact that a 'global regulator' basically is Global Government. How long till we start paying our carbon taxes to them?
What I didn't know about Peter "animal rights" Singer
All I knew about was his advocation of treating animals more or less par to humans. However, he says (in 2006) it's OK to kill babies after they're born, if they're disabled. Hitler did that.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51963
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51963
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
The ADL are 'hideously anti-Semitic'
They got all riled up over a cartoon. It's not even that bad, and surely it makes the Islamic outrage over the Danish cartoons appear vaguely justified. (Which of course it was not. Little thing called free speech? Welcome to the West, that's how it is over here, you should be able to speak without getting beheaded. Don't like it, go somewhere else.)
(Image: "I disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it." Guess that phrase doesn't have the same ring to it in modern fascist times.)When the Israeli army wears T-shirts like this (and don't think the IOF* haven't really done that before), forgive me for thinking there are more important things than what I believe to be an intelligent and accurate cartoon. Like the Nazi regime occupying Palestinian birthright territory for instance (oh snap!)
Seriously, the ADL actually causes 'anti-Semitism' (or, if you like to point out that most Israelis aren't Semitic yet Palestinians are; 'anti-Jewish sentiment') by its 'boy who cried wolf cried wolf and then cried wolf again but oh wait there's a real wolf PLEASE LISTENNN!' attitude. The ADL makes Jews and Israelis seem like Nazis, which is not fair or true.
Now many good ordinary Jews/Israelis are waking up to the fact their religion and society has been hijacked and that their victim mentality has been artificially maintained by a manipulative few in the media and politics; groups have formed such as Jews against the Occupation and Jews against Zionism.
(Image: Does Israel have control of American policy? It would be too easy to list all the Jews close to the top in the US. But, accusations of anti-Semitism aside, does several people being Jewish mean that they are working together? Not necessarily. This is a murky issue, made more so by political correctness, but for the record I don't think we are up against a "Jew World Order" as I have said before. Rather it is too convenient how we are easily divided-and-conquered over this issue, suggesting we are supposed to look for the oversimplistic common denominators such as religion. If the elite do share a religion, by the way, it seems to be Satanism/Luciferianism, not Judaism or Jewish Zionism.)Anyone with a modicum of common sense and a few simple facts understands that Israel is not in any danger. It has a massive military, one of the most advanced in the world, and most of all a nuclear arsenal. Sorry to burst anyone's bubble but most of this stuff is paid for by the US, at least since 1974.
Iran is about as much threat to its neighbours as North Korea, ie zero. Israel on the other hand has proven to be expansionist, aggressive, driven by religious fanaticism (the dream of a Greater Israel) to the point of ethnic cleansing and genocide. And now they want to call Iran a threat to security!? Only a Zionist hiding behind the trauma of the Jewish people could get away with such hypocrisy. Not to mention the murder. Palestine's butchery by Zionism will not be forgotten; 'Never Again' really meant NEVER again.
*yes IOF does refer to Israeli Occupying Forces. Illicitly land-grabbing since 1948.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
