Black French Serial Rapist's Defence: Racism! (time to end white guilt)

Unbelieveable. Perhaps we should pat him on the back and apologise to him for his difficult upbringing, which clearly caused him to rape and, in his words, "humiliate" fifteen white women because he hated white people? (Which, by the way, ought by any objective standard to be classed as a clear-cut hate crime, but I doubt it will have been, somehow)



My patience with this race card bullshit snapped recently. I'm tired of it. The double standard I mean. Tired of it. Again, though, we must ask who benefits from this grey squirrel/red squirrel game.

I just read some comments on a video about white poverty due to institutional anti-white discrimination in the so-called "Rainbow Nation" of South Africa, and there were white Europeans on there honestly saying that it's OK and that we deserve to be dominated by other peoples for a while because we have been sooo eeevil. (what, other races practiced slavery including the locals in pre-colonial Africa, and whites have been Slaves/Slavs at times too.)

The fundamental goal of the NWO is to destroy Western civilisation, the bastion of freedom and decent standards of living, so that the whole world can basically go back to a medieval feudalist style existence. (Only this time it will be cloaked in Green.)

I want Africans to develop Africa into a successful continent. I would like nothing more than for Arabs in the Middle East to liberate themselves from theocracy. And incase you haven't noticed, I would like Whites and Western civilisation to survive too, but rather than being an example to the rest of the world, we are on a road to self destruction, partially because we have convinced ourselves we are are a cancer on the Earth.

Well, we didn't entirely convince ourselves of our own volition. The Marxist-manipulated education system did that...track the source from there if you dare...

IDF Fabricates Anti-Semitic Flotilla Audio Tape (Also: Helen Thomas' foolish remark)

By way of deception you shall make war

I want to stop lying, but it's habitual...I...can't...STOP!

Israel Defense Force Fabricates Anti-Semitic Remarks in Aid Flotilla Tape

It could only make me think of this...
Fake Audio



Real Audio



As for Helen Thomas' bollocks remark, I wouldn't wish that on Germany and Poland. I like them and I'm sure they already have enough immigration problems.

Technically, would 'go back to Khazaria' be more accurate? That would have been a much better place to create a Jewish state anyway, since it was the most recent Jewish state (what was it, about 900 years ago?). Yep, Khazaria could have been recreated with few problems and without forcibly housing 1.5 million locals in a locked-down 12x4 mile ghetto who then get rowdy and fire rockets at you.

We (as in 'the West') need to stop sending billions in military aid every year to Israel, leave them alone to have their own country, and get the hell out of the Middle East, all of it, because it's not our place. Then we actually have some credibility when arguing against mass immigration and the Islamisation of Europe rather than looking like hypocrites and Zionist stooges, which we currently are.

Reasonable?

Under Scrutiny, IDF Retracts Claims About Flotilla’s Al Qaeda Links

Criticism of Rand Paul Reveals The Real Racists

Opposition to government regulation of who businesses choose to deal with isn't racist



Rand Paul has come under reactionary criticism for stating his opposition to one particular part of the US Civil Rights Act, specifically the rule that businesses must comply with the same anti-discrimination law as the government. Oh, they think they've got him on this one...are we ready...OMG RACISSS!!!

It's pitiful really.

Consider this example. A business decides they don't want to serve blacks. What will then happen to that business? It will be shamed, boycotted, and most likely driven out of business or at least will incur major losses of both customers and public image.

In the modern era, by contrast, businesses are falling over themselves to appear tolerant and diverse. Why is this? (Clue: NOT because the government made a rule.)

The answer is, it's what the people want. Giving people what they want in the marketplace is good for business.

However, if you believe the people who think they've uncovered a bogeyman 'racist' here, most people can't wait to provoke people of other races by refusing to do business with them. Who is the one thinking backwardly here?

Oh, and of course, classic rule: whites are the only racists. See how quickly the insinuations of 'white' domination are raised? Although, could it not just as easily be a black owned business discriminating against white people? Actually, I wonder what some of these government schooled commies would say to that - a black or arab owned business refusing to serve white people? I bet they'd remind us that diversity is important in a multicultural society and that opposing such a business would be 'intolerant'.

Seriously. "White privilege" as taught widely at government schools is the most racist, defamatory concept present in western society today. It disgusted me when I encountered it in education; ironically most white kids are eager to believe that they must pay for the sin of being part of an allegedly 'oppressive' racial group.

I must be missing out; what privileges am I entitled to? I would like to be cut in on this white privilege deal, thank you very much. If, of course, it really does exist.

And so we have uncovered the real racists (they often call themselves 'progressives', ironically...are we in our promised 'post-racial' utopia yet, by the way? What ever would you fall back on when losing an argument if there was no more racism?). The truth hurts.

I for one respect all people, but I am not 'guilty', neither am I 'privileged', just for being white!

Arizona Immigation Law: Can I Support It?

This is a very complex issue and a simple yes or no answer just won't do. As usual I am wary of the polarising, divisive nature of this kind of argument and I don't find either camp of the debate to be completely appealing.

Brief interlude: Miss Oklahoma stands up for states' rights (state sovereignty). The politically correct judge got owned! He wasn't expecting her response, I bet.

(Now did she really approve that for Infowars???)

Starting with what the law actually does:

"Called one of the 'toughest legislations in the nation', the law means that all immigrants in Arizona must now carry their alien registration documents and it means that police can question anyone they think may be in the United States illegally. It will also address people that knowingly hire illegal immigrants or who transport them."

That description has been criticised by some supporters of the law, who contend that the police can only inquire about the status of a potential illegal alien (love the American terminology, btw, do they arrive in saucers?) if they have 'reasonable suspicion'. Now, reasonable suspicion is vague and the same flowery rationalisation behind the un-PATRIOT Act.

On the other hand, illegal immigration is a huge problem for America with an estimated 11 million illegal aliens bringing a crime wave with them across the border from an unstable Mexico. Many are declaring themselves to be invaders, and part of groups like La Raza (the Race) designed to 'liberate' states of America and 'return' them to Me-hee-co. Bullshit based on faulty history and even faultier racial prejudice. Can you imagine if whites formed a group called 'The Race'? Yet these illegals (backed by the intelligence agencies no doubt) have the gall to not only advocate racial supremacism, but at the same time call whites racist!

So I should support the law 100%, right? It is popular after all...



Well, not completely. Although I do sympathise with the reasons for passing it.

Some problems with the law are pointed out here

I personally don't give a damn whether it may constitute racial profiling. In case you can't tell I'm growing a little tired of the race card being played every two minutes. Everything is racist unless it's either indifferent or anti-white, then it's politically correct. The illegals in America are almost all from Mexico, duh! So it is inevitable when rooting out illegals that in America's case you're not going to be as likely to investigate someone who looks Chinese than you are someone who looks Mexican. Sorry.

Still, I found this mock ad funny:



Which brings me to my next point: this law only gives the state the power to do something that in America's case, the federal government should have done years ago. But I am not holding my breath. I will only be convinced if and when we actually see truck after truck deporting illegal immigrants back across the border. Until then I refuse to believe they will actually do it (too many employers rely on the cheap labour I bet), but we shall see.

And if it does actually work out, perhaps...naw, now I am dreaming, Britain would never ever take seriously their citizenship requirements. Besides, we have open borders mandated from Brussels, just another reason to quit the EU ASAP (wishful thinking, again).

Also, one final point: do we need borders in the first place? In the future at some time I would suggest not, but for now as long as two thirds of the world is an empoverished hellhole made so in part by our financial and corporate interests, I believe local solutions like Arizona's are not merely justifiable, but necessary. Crime and instability along border regions is nothing new to history; England had major problems for centuries along the Welsh and Scottish borders. Wonder what they did with invading 'immigrants'? Probably just killed them on the spot. How's that for 'racial profiling'.

One solution NOT up for MSM disussion is to legalise ALL drugs immediately. This would crush all the drug lords, in particular the drug gangs destabilising Mexico as we speak (a major cause of Mexican migration north). In fact, the benefits of re-legalisation of all 'illegal drugs' would be tremendous in many other ways, too, but the improvements in Mexico's condition as a result would probably halt Mexican immigration into the US right then and there.

So I'm keeping an eye on this because if it is a success, and I want it to be but I have my doubts that significant deportations will actually occur, then it must not be an isolated case - popular demand will see to that.

Update: seeing how calls were made to 'boycott Arizona', Arizonans respond with their own threats of counter-boycott:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/19/arizona-official-threatens-cut-los-angeles-power-payback-boycott/

Exposing Islamism Is Good, But Exposing Zionism Is Racist

I appreciate the perspective offered by various people who do a good job exposing the insidious, totalitarian nature of theocratic Islam and the danger it poses to the Western World, not in the form of phoney intel front terror attacks, but in the form of demographics and the alleged, projected figures that would see Europe become majority Muslim/arab inside the next century.

Yes, the implications of that cannot be overlooked and are a significant concern. Sharia law is backwards and immoral.

***BUT***

How many Muslim arabs are there in the seats of power? How many of our political leaders have ties to Saudi or Iran or Turkey or Somalia?

Not very many. Michael Moore exhausted that one (Saudi).

How many have ties to Israel?

***DING DING DING***

(The last one is especially rich since Obama has been criticised as 'anti-Israel' for even talking about halting Jewish illegal immigration into the West Bank. Believe me, son-of-a-terrorist Rahm is there to make sure he doesn't go against the interests of the self-styled Chosen People.)

But the point is, this would be a 'legitimate' issue, one more easily discussed, if our political leaders had ties to pretty much any other country. We could talk about it in an open manner, come to the probable conclusion that is was a bad thing for the country, and advise that we have fewer politicians with ties to foreign interests that conflict with their official position.

But for some reason, when those corrupting ties are with the 'Jewish' state, it suddenly becomes 'racist' to point them out. Ever notice that?

Dual Citizenship - Loyal To Whom? (American article)

In Britain, Conservative Friends of Israel and Labour Friends of Israel are two of the most influential lobby groups in the country (in America, AIPAC is likewise). One will note both Tony Blair, architect of British involvement in the so-called 'war on terror' which is destroying many of Israel's regional competitors, is a member, as is Gordon Brown. According to this article, 80% of Conservative MPs are said to be part of CFoI.

"I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel" - David Cameron, now British PM, addressing a CFoI dinner, 2006 (source linked immediately above)

Basically, if you want to be anyone and get anywhere in British or American politics, it seems being a 'friend of Israel' helps a lot!

And now William Hague, CFoI member and your new Foreign Secretary, wants to get tough with Iran (I mean, he wants to order our men in uniform to risk their lives 'getting tough with Iran', of course). Outrageous, they haven't done anything to us. But they are a threat to Israel's dominance in the Middle East. Imagine if Israel wasn't the only rogue nuclear power over there!

1992 USA: Head of Israel Lobby quits after boasting of his influence

Can you imagine if it was any country other than Israel? France even! Imagine the outrage, the indignation of it all. People would say they were under occupation from a foreign power. The people would not rest until this injustice was righted.

But it's Israel, so don't discuss it, or you are a racist. Bring up the Holocaust (ignoring, of course, the Holodomor, Soviet genocide in the Ukraine 1932-33 Seven Million dead carried out primarily by Jewish Bolsheviks, what does that do to your sanitised version of history, didn't get taught that in school did you?) so we can avoid this difficult topic, and say something about how arabs are dangerous.

“Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care.” - Ariel Sharon (source)

So you are willing to blow up synagogues...what about a certain well known pair of Towers, Mr Sharon?

...

Islamism or Zionism - which is the bigger danger to the West? They must both be exposed.

Machete: An Anti-White Racist Film

The comparison with the old KKK film "Birth of a Nation" is probably the most appropriate.



Opposing the Marxist agenda is not racist...THIS is racist.

(Some people think it's just a funny parody...well if the 'bad guys' were anything but white, the film would not have been made - be honest)

A Government Takeover, Not A Muslim One

Playing arabs and whites off against each other, as I said

Parents' outrage as Catholic school children told 'dress as a Muslim for mosque trip - or you will be branded a truant'
Daily Mail

A Catholic schoolgirl has been branded a 'truant' by her teachers after she refused to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque.

Staff had ordered 14-year-old Amy Owen and her classmates to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote 'community cohesion.'

Parents at the 1,100 pupil Ellesmere Port Catholic High School in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire were also told they were each required to make a £3 contribution towards the trip for all Year Nine students.

But when Amy refused to dress in Muslim attire for the visit to Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool, staff warned her about rules and said refusal would mean non attendance which would then be marked down as an 'unauthorised absence.'

In a stern letter to her family with words in block capitals and underlined, the school's headmaster Peter Lee said the visit was 'as compulsory as a geography field trip.'

He added: 'There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.

'The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement. None of us would relish that.

'Whilst I may not require you to pay for this I must require your child to participate.'

It is believed up to ten other families from Amy's Year 9 classes also refused to dress as Muslims and were marked down in the truanting register.

But Amy's mother Michelle Davies, 34, a home help said: 'It's like they're putting a gun to your head - either you go to a mosque, or you're marked down as an unauthorised absence on your record - that's it no two ways about it.

Full Article

Now, there are racist/theocratic Muslim arabs out there, certainly. But 'they' are not taking over the country any more than WASPs and the EDL are.

Look who is doing this to us, really. It's the state, not Muslims themselves (in this case at least). The state bureaucracy is filled with predominantly white people, frankly. It is the state that is engaging in this kind of crap, not to encourage 'cohesion' as they call it, but to discourage it.

The mindless drones that like to pose as 'teachers', or other authority figures, may well enforce this rubbish thinking it's for the 'greater good' when really it is designed to provoke YOU to go back into your little box of racial and religious division, as well as removing your freedom. It's a very simple game and unfortunately the human beings usually lose to supremacist arabs, jews, blacks and whites. Because nobody can resist a good old tribal war.

(Admitting it is the first step. Sometimes I think it would be better to kick all the immigrants out. And then I check myself - reptillian brain momentarily taking over, thinking on my behalf? You bet.)

The physical body and its DNA may be awesome, but it's not who you really are, just your vehicle. Everyone is unique on the 'inside', esoterically. To hell with the sycophantic, divisionist PC gay/race/gender 'tolerance' agenda! And stop demanding to teach 4 year olds about homosexuality, you perverted freaks!

"Machete": Provoking A Race War?

Film depicts Mexicans going 'across the border' to machete the 'racist' white people

First of all check out Son3's post on this.

There is definitely an agenda afoot to use the racial division to provoke outright hostility between, in America's case, latinos and whites. And it's not much different between arabs and whites in "Eurabia", or in other words the mass immigration of arabs into Europe.

No I don't think banning the burka is a wise idea, by the way, neither do I think Arizona's new immigration law is going to help. See, they could already deport illegal immigrants, without having to do racial profiling and stopping random people going about their business. (The problem is the police are complicit with illegal immigration in the first place, they need to stop their complicity and actually deport people rather than looking the other way - they do not need any new powers to do this, you see?)

And it's going to turn nasty, like this from Seattle:
U.S. police in 'Rodney King' beating of Mexican as officer is filmed stamping on man's head

The point is, it takes two to tango. Alienating latinos by passing racial profiling laws like the one in Arizona won't help. It gives the impression that whites and the police are siding against the Mexicans, us against them, see? That is the basis of world control. There are forces behind this, i.e. the state and the social engineers, who want nothing more than to cause chaos here, in order to offer their 'solution', which means more power for them.

I would suggest that brewing immigration wars are an ideal pretext to push for ID cards or microchipping...after all, if you're a 'legal citizen', what have you got to hide?

BNP Candidate Attacked, Unprovoked, on Camera

Nazi scum off our streets, but which ones!!?



Not defending the BNP, but this guy deserves recognition alongside Epic Beard Man.

And you know who the spitting kid reminds me of?

Animals Murder White South African Farmers

Consider the headline to be a racism test. If you think it's racist, you fail the test. You still have prejudice to shed. This is slow bleed genocide, just like in Palestine. And the people responsible for it are appropriately designated as animals, although really that is an insult to animals.

Who's the racist now, cracker bitches?

(I blame slavery for this, myself...)

RevolutionMuslim Group Run By Israeli Radicals?

"RevolutionMuslim" were the people who caused the South Park Muhammad controversy.

The “Radical” Muslim Group That Threatened South Park Creators Was Founded and Run by Joseph Cohen, a Former Israeli Radical Who Used to Live in a Settlement in the West Bank

I still think drawing Muhammad is a good idea though, just to make a point about draconian theocratic cult-ure. But again and again the 'fundamentalist Muslims' turn out to be CIA-Mossad-MI5. How many times does it have to repeat until people see the pattern. Artificial crisis, predictable response.

They laugh at us for we are like robots. Hell, I was thinking about doing a free speech post on "Draw Muhammad Day" just because I didn't think the impostors would stoop so low as to create such a silly distraction story as this. They must be desperate...

The guy with the Star of David tattoo ^ (just ignore that little detail) is part of "Hamas", that deadly Muslim terrorist group that was founded by Israel in the 1980s. Kind of like how Al-Qaeda was founded by the CIA. Ahem, not supposed to mention that, are we.

More ADL Nonsense: "Violent Voices" Oppose Obamacare

Funny, the ADL's official mandate is to "stop the defamation of the Jewish people". Now they adopt a broad interpretation of that at the best of times, but frankly is this any of their business?

ADL Calls For “Major Law Enforcement Operation” To Deal With Obamacare Critics

by Paul Joseph Watson

A major Anti-Defamation League report goes further than ever before in an effort to purge the Internet of all dissent, listing completely non-violent criticism of Obamacare posted on Internet forums as a reason to conduct a “major law enforcement operation” against opponents of big government and health care reform.

The ADL’s April 2010 report is entitled, “Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity,” and consists largely of lists of comments culled from alternative news websites and forums, as well as Fox News.

“During the first few months of 2010, anti-government extremism has taken on a new level of intensity in the United States. The arrests of the Hutaree militia in Michigan illustrate this passion, which exists both within and outside the militia movement. Unfortunately, the Hutaree arrests may come to be seen not as the culmination, but rather as a first step in what may need to become a major national law enforcement operation,” states the introduction.

Full Story

ADL Report - Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity

AIPAC holding together the Zionist myth

"But times are changing. Even AIPAC no longer tries to keep up the old fiction that criticizing Israel is, in and of itself, an anti-semitic act. There are too many Israeli Jews, who are obviously loyal to their nation, criticizing their government for that old canard to stick.

So now the right-wingers have come up with a more sophisticated version: "Soft" critics of Israel are OK -- those who don't go too far in their criticism -- but "hard" critics of Israel are obviously anti-semites. And of course AIPAC and its right-wing partners in Israel gets to decide what counts as going too far."

Full article

Of course, here's what you do when your fellow Jews, who are supposed to support the racist, anti-Christian, anti-Arab, anti-Semitic crusade, start breaking ranks...



...you get your Zionist 'brownshirts' to beat them up!



Jews against Zionism are truly a commendable group of people.

SPLC Brands 9/11 Truth "Hate"

I love how being "anti-government" (pro freedom) is apparently hateful. Most anarchists are the nicest people; support of government is, by comparison, often hateful.

The political-correctness types, while claiming to fight hatred, are often hateful little demons themselves; they have that look in their eye that says, "I am on a power trip and I hate you because your opinions are different". They would be at home manning concentration camps themselves, I feel.

The Unlikeliest Conspiracy-Monger: Colorado Public TV

As for their poo-pooing of FEMA camps, as one commenter said, they are the kind of people who would have denied, denied, denied the existence of gulags/camps in the Soviet or Nazi regimes. Because "My Government Wouldn't Do That", or "If That Was True It Would Have Been In The News".

Let's face it, the SPLC would like nothing more than to censor everything so that they control the minds of the entire populace (just to prevent anyone having any 'hateful' thoughts; and that's hateful according to their Orwellian definition). Truth is the greatest enemy of the State, as Goebbels said.

It's clear who the real Nazis are.

Shameless Anti-Free Speech Basterds

The Simon Wiesenthal Center labels questioning government 'hate'

Not kidding!

Said it before, will say it again, these guys, like the ADL and the SPLC don't give a damn about Jews, blacks or anybody. Their agenda is to sow racial tension and crush free speech by saying there are tons of dangerous hateful people out there who we must censor now, or else!

Bollocks. These groups *need* racists to be around, so they can continue to justify their existence. Sometimes I wonder to what extent these groups actually go out of their way to support these racist types.

So don't be racist, not just because it's wrong and a denial of individualism, also because you're just giving them ammo to come after free speech. But that said, at the same time, don't fall for their little trick of saying having an opinion is racist - like not supporting Obama means you hate black people for example, which is really at the ridiculous end of things.

Can you believe the audacity of these groups? You'd think, as Ayn Rand (a Jewish woman herself) said, if they wanted to defend minorities they would start with the individual, since they are the smallest minority. But apparently not.

Turn Biden’s Public Humiliation to America’s Advantage

by Michael Scheuer

...I am not sure that anything will change because the Israelis treated Biden as what he and all U.S. leaders are when dealing with Israel — abject and effete lickspittles. But an attempt must quickly be made to end the present U.S.-Israel relationship before the corrupting impact is felt of the wads of money and media “explanations” U.S. citizen Israel-Firsters are now preparing to deliver for the use of those they have suborned in the Federal government, the Congress, and among the paragons of free speech they own across the breadth of the U.S. journalistic profession...

Full Article

Reminder: USS Liberty attack (definitely not an 'accident'!)

"But that's anti-Semitic" [yawn]

The Untold History of Jewish Opposition to Zionism

Fantastic article

"The Long--and Largely Untold--History Of Jewish Opposition to Zionism"

detailing what people stuck in the Anti-Semitism vs Zionism way of thinking need to know.

To equate Zionism to Judaism is like trying to equate Nazism to Christianity.

The only difference is nobody tries to equate Nazism to Christianity on a constant basis.

The political movement of Zionism depends on creating the illusion that Zionism and Judaism are synonymous.

This is the actual cause behind much of the perceived and/or real anti-Jewish racism in the present day.

Which in turn gives Jews the impression everyone is out to get them, thus reinforcing the popularity of Zionist-Talmudic racist beliefs that everyone who is non-Jewish is 'goyim' (cattle).

Racial division producing more racial division.

I know the real Zionists were in bed with the Nazis during WW2.

"Repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it"

"Divide and Rule", just like Hitler did.

http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/

David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews

This is a British TV documentary intended to smear Icke by parroting the baseless ADL claim that when he says 'lizards' he refers to Jews. I think the ADL and the left wing fascist book burners come off much, much worse here. Take a look. What do you think?



Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5

Icke was/is right about a lot of things, ya know. As I say, is he a crazy genius or just crazy? I tend toward the former.

Little side note re part 2: I think it's fantastic that Jones and Icke started to unite and not in-fight a few years ago. I am not one of those who believes either of these figures to be a 'shill', they just have different opinions and ways of reaching people. And they are flawed average human beings in fairly difficult circumstances that would drive many others insane. I'll have to write about my views on Jones soon enough...

As for the racists and neo-Nazis, well they're always going to be around, much like racist black people or for that matter racist Zionist Jews or racist Nazi Germans or racist Fundamentalist Islamists. The agenda of groups like the ADL has nothing to do with stopping racism and everything to do with setting a precedent to crush free speech.

1. Ban freedom of expression for Nazis, Holocaust Deniers etc.
2. Equate every other dissenting view that exists with Nazism and Holocaust Denial. (maybe make them wear little yellow stars?)
3. EnDgAmE Nazi Style Thought-Police State.

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for those we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all" (that includes Holocaust Deniers who are currently imprisoned, by the way, or do your principles not apply to everyone?)

If you want to hear more of Icke's actual views, not what some anti-free speech cranks think are his views, see his (7hrs long) presentation here. Perhaps have some kind of drinking game - drink every time he mentions 'Jews'. Guarantee you'll finish sobre. And perhaps a little more aware of...many things. (That thing took me a week to get through, lol)

Daily Mail: Mass Immigration is a Multiculturalist Conspiracy

I missed this one a while ago but take a look:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249797/Labour-threw-open-doors-mass-migration-secret-plot-make-multicultural-UK.html

It seems mass immigration is designed to more easily take away our rights by playing racial groups off against one another, inciting hatred which then is used as a justification for desecrating freedom of speech; also by spreading 'white guilt' and non-white 'oppression complex' which themselves cause racial tension...when will people learn there is no such thing as Positive Discrimination? And that Multiculturalism means we bring in people from all over the world to practice their culture but intimidate you (native people) for practicing yours?

Do not blame the international peasants who have come to this country. Better targets for responsibility are found in government, academia, mass media and the general societal attitude that whites are racist opressors and all others are opressed by whites. This view is a post-Colonial cultural dinosaur that can't die off quickly enough, not least because it is contradicted by countless examples of racist attacks and repressions against white people by non-whites. These just don't appear in the major media, which prefer to focus solely on white racist crimes.

Old Colonialism was done along racial lines.

New Colonialism ('international socialism' and 'global finance') is the banking government screwing everybody...there is no master race except those who can print money for themselves.

Racism isn't dead, rather many modern 'anti-racists' are themselves the most racist people imaginable. We must get beyond racial issues, yes, but that isn't going to happen when political correctness tries to make everything a racial issue and sees white racism everywhere, then advocates anti-white racism known as 'positive discrimination' (aka 'affirmative action') as a 'solution'. You can't put out a fire with petrol.

Oh and one more thing...THAT'S RACIST!!! (points finger)

The man's got big jewish balls

Prison Planet - Auschwitz survivor sees Nazi acts in Israel

“The Israelis tried to dehumanize the Palestinians, just like the Nazis tried to dehumanize me,” said Dr Hajo Meyer, 86

(He must be one of those Anti-Semites...)

True Torah Jews Against Zionism