13 May 2011

UPDATE: Due to this BS thing where I can do everything with this blog except publish a post, I have moved home to Wordpress: http://ncnblogger.wordpress.com/ (this will remain as an archive and be damn sure I will still read all your wonderful blogs as ever). Those who have linked me please update the link. Thanks all. Looking forward to continued blogging in the future.

2 May

Today's news is that Osama is dead. Well it's sort of 10 year old news, but there you go. Supposedly one of the very mind controlled special forces shot him in the head, although given the notorious nature of the invading forces' willingness to kill someone then play dress up afterwards, who knows it may have been a woman who they drew a beard on with marker pen. Photo looks 'shopped but what do I know. Then again corpses just like your TV dinner keep very well in the freezer...lol...


http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.php

Anyway I'm off to get kidney dialysis using only sand and donkey piss while being hunted by all the satellites and spy planes that a trillion dollar military budget can buy, for ten years. Ciao


PS does this mean the war on terror is over now and 'we' can come home and dismantle the police state and not have RFID passports and iris scans and creepy wiretaps anymore? (Comptroller says no)

Monday, 25 May 2009

Russia Today reports on New World Order film

"The New World Order is a controversial new film that goes behind the scenes of the American anti-globalisation movement."

I should add at this point that, unlike what the disinfo Wikipedia articles say, anti-globalisation is not the same as anti-capitalism, nor is it anti-Semitic (what!!!). I am anti-world government, very much pro-capitalism, and don't want either freedom of trade, or national sovereignty, to continue to be destroyed by our corrupt slavemasters. That is all.

13 comments:

NobodyofValue said...

Smart Smart...and we were just talking about Alex Jones.

AdamS said...

The answer to 1984...is 1776! :)

CarolineNot said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Son3 said...

Isn't the meaning of that saying lost or different in Britain?

:D

Son3 said...

(Accidentally used my mom's account in deleted comment.)

AdamS said...

The meaning of 1776 in Britain? Well, the American Revolution isn't well taught in Britain, so I guess you're right.

But we know 1776 was extremely justified, and the British Empire didn't treat its native citizens much better than others in the colonies abroad. The British establishment may have resented America throughout the 1800s because of this, but the ordinary people always supported the Americans, in particular during the Civil War and getting rid of slavery.

If an American knows what 1984 means, then a Brit with at least some basic historical knowledge will get what 1776 was all about.

AdamS said...

Oh, that was you Son? haha stop hacking other peoples' accounts lol

Son3 said...

We share a computer, what can I say?

LOL!

Okay, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation!

BTW, from one American to another-in-spirit, I side with the Confederates in the War for Southern Independence.

I would have fought tooth 'n' nail to abolish slavery, but I would have to side with states' rights on that one.

It was an insane war that didn't need to happen, but the wrong side won once it started.

Son3 said...

That is, I would have to side with states' rights on that war, not slavery.

AdamS said...

Oh yeah, I'm not saying the Civil war was about slavery as the modern storyline goes. I'm just saying that during the Civil War era, there was much working class support in this country for Abraham Lincoln.

When I read more about the Civil War a while back, I came to pretty much the same opinion as you. Unfortunately nowadays, you've got a crowd of zombies who think states' rights means the right to engage in slavery, and therefore they support power centralisation.

It's another case of history being written by the victors.

AdamS said...

ooh and I see your italic pedantry, yes it was a war between two nations, techincally not a civil war. My last point above applies to this as well.

Son3 said...

Okay, I hate to keep stringing these comments along, but I had to look up what a "pedantry" was.

(A flower or rule of grammar, I wasn't sure; "I have a pedantry?")

And, while we're seeing eye to eye that it was between two nations, the italic thing was about my lack of proof-reading, because I thought my phraseology might be construed to mean I favored the right of a state to continue slavery.

Oh, how confusing! :)

AdamS said...

From dictionary.com

"Pedantry: slavish attention to rules, details, etc."

I thought you used the italics to emphasise to me that it was a *war*, not a *civil war* as the name goes. This is a detail that others who support the Confederates tend to point out.

I see what you meant now. Of course, for the people who think states' rights means the right to enslave others, there are certain things states cannot do, obviously, among which is to permit slavery.

Older Posts

Undebunkable Chemtrails Video That The "Debunkers" Ignore...

...and yes, Chemtrails interfere with weather

(but why they are used, no-one fully knows...)

And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?

It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?

Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!

No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)

I'm Already Against The Next War

I'm Already Against The Next War
Stop the propaganda before it's here. If some kind of terror attack happens in the West, Iran probably didn't do it. They have no history of imperialism and would be suicidal to attack the West. Think who benefits. No bombing of Iran.