State Eugenics is back, who do we forcibly sterilise first?

I would have said that the suggestion to sterilise the poor was just a rare exception, but recalling previous opinions of Guardian and Daily Mail readers, I have no doubt that this opinion is widely held among more self righteous members of the herd.

Of course, it would never be you, would it? It's always be them, over there, the rabble, the scum, who would be on the receiving end. Elitist bastards. Marxists might belong to the most murderous non-religious cult in history, but they do have a point about class war.

I know that many ordinary supporters of the cradle to grave state have damn good intentions, but whatever the truth about the morality and pragmatism of this system, heck I'm not sure about that myself, the real eugenicists (whose aim is dumbing people down, not building them up) have benefited tremendously from it. Yet it's funny, all those breeders on benefits, and we still can't acheive replacement fertility?

That is the real eugenics, and all you self righteous presumably middle class types who wouldn't mind sterilising the unworthy peasantry, you are yourselves victims of it. Eat up! Every mouthful you take from your BPA lined plastic containers and cans makes you a little more infertile. Who's laughing now? Well it's certainly not your children 'cause you won't be having any. Not so funny! Malthus finds it Hitlerious though. It's for the Earth, you understand. Hurry up and die so you stop consuming things you don't really need, like oxygen.

Eugenics is the product of people who have lost respect for human life and do not see themselves as being interconnected with the rest of humanity. Soulless creatures. Not atheists, just negative eugenicists.

PS: I don't use the term 'eugenicist' as a pejorative because really everyone is a eugenicist in practice - partner selection is a blatantly eugenic process. So I specify state eugenics, i.e. forcing people to comply with eugenic processes, and I emphasise both conventional negative eugenics (the sterilisation or worse of 'unfit' individuals) and what I describe as 'real eugenics' (the actual aim of most social engineers, which is to REDUCE the health and intellect of a society, not INCREASE it like the naive popular conception of eugenics says), as being the evil eugenics that we rightly consider to be nefarious. Why would tyrants want to kill off the 'weak'? No, they want to kill off anyone who might resist them. That's what the Commies did. That's what the school system's real purpose is.

Lyndon LaRouche Theatre (1986)

What is it they say about the best comedy being close to the truth?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7786609813647356541

Ugh, the common people!

Inflation.us video: Empty Store Shelves Coming?

I have a few things to say about this video.



First of all, I'm not a fan of the gold and silver brokers running sites that, even if they do tell the truth, are clearly pushing feeeeeeeeaaaarrr to sell their products.

Secondly you cannot eat gold or silver so it will not be much use in a real crisis (as a store of wealth superior to government funny money, oh yes, but during food shortages? No)

Thirdly, criticisms aside, take a look at how fragile our convenience society is when even the slightest thing goes wrong. Now hardened criminals, that's one thing. But many many 'law abiding' people (the ones who never saw it coming, I mean) will be ready to kill if the convenience society falls apart, you can be sure of that. They are just as dangerous as the regular criminal population in a crisis.

I don't think it needs to be said, but this video definitely does not only apply to America. It's the entire world coughing up blood (all the money has already been coughed up, it's gone to the bailed-out banking families). The economic reckoning can only be stopped by dethroning (sometimes literally) the financial elite and their debt slavery system; easier said than done.

Empty shelves in Zimbabwe, an extreme example of hyperinflation/price controls due to the crooks running the central bank printing money for themselves...sounds familiar eh? (OK that isn't the sole cause of food shortages in Zim, there's also the disenfranchising of the farmers who just happened to be crackas, I admit, but still)

War Is A Ritual, or Don't Bomb My Tax Haven Please

First let us take a look at the largely static trench systems of WW1. Here's a map of where the rabble obediently fought over land not big enough to bury the dead.

Notice anything unusual?

The machine gun/infantry predicament made it inevitable that the stalemate would ensue from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. Except one place where an invisible force field (kidding...or am I?) prevents the trenches from expanding into.

And don't buy their explanation that the Swiss were 'neutral'. Belgium was neutral, but the Germans marched right over them regardless in an attempt to outflank the French. So some are more neutral than others, hmm?

And again in WW2. When our chaps were taken POW, where did they run to? Home? That's a lot more difficult than running to der Schweitz, again neutral, and being flown home from this 'neutral' country!

If you were commanding ze Germans in WW2, and unlike Hitler you actually were trying to win, you surely would annex Switzerland immediately and cancel out its neutral status. It would be easy and it would solve a lot of problems, including the easy escape for POWs.

So what do we make of this situation? Two world human sacrifices, and this little neutral country - despite both times offering a strategic advantage to those who would violate its neutrality - remains unscathed (while others like Belgium and Holland are not so lucky).

Magick? Bank accounts?

Bank accounts.

But whose? Be Eye Ssss

"The BIS is also a frequent target of allegations by conspiracy theorists, many of whom portray it as a front organization through which a wealthy elite controls the world. Some argue that the bank has not helped matters through a culture of secretiveness"

Before any misunderstanding is made, I like Switzerland, especially their neutrality and their militia. But it must be understood that the finance oligarchs have done everything to undermine the neutrality and sovereignty of other nations; they only let places like der Schweitz exist because it suits them. Free trade + bailouts for the banksters, green economy adventure for us. Simple equation.

Did I mention that the Square Mile of London is a tax haven? Yet, it's such a 'good', 'sneaky' tax haven, it somehow does not appear on most lists of tax havens. (Take a look for yourself here)

"London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more "usual suspect” jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute."

Square Mile too secretive, says report

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the slaves
Britons never never never shall make waves
?

Hopi Prophecies and the Gulf Oil Disaster

Here's a different tangent for you to go off on today. Quite a set of coincidences, hmm?

Hopi Prophecies: (signs of the end of this Age)

Quote,

1. "This is the First Sign: We are told of the coming of the white-skinned men, like Pahana, but not living like Pahana men who took the land that was not theirs. And men who struck their enemies with thunder.

2. "This is the Second Sign: Our lands will see the coming of spinning wheels filled with voices. In his youth, my father saw this prophecy come true with his eyes -- the white men bringing their families in wagons across the prairies."

3. "This is the Third Sign: A strange beast like a buffalo but with great long horns, will overrun the land in large numbers. These White Feather saw with his eyes -- the coming of the white men's cattle."

4. "This is the Fourth Sign: The land will be crossed by snakes of iron."

5. "This is the Fifth Sign: The land shall be criss-crossed by a giant spider's web."

6. "This is the Sixth sign: The land shall be criss-crossed with rivers of stone that make pictures in the sun."

7. "This is the Seventh Sign: You will hear of the sea turning black, and many living things dying because of it."

8. "This is the Eight Sign: You will see many youth, who wear their hair long like my people, come and join the tribal nations, to learn their ways and wisdom.

9. "And this is the Ninth and Last Sign: You will hear of a dwelling-place in the heavens, above the earth, that shall fall with a great crash. It will appear as a blue star. Very soon after this, the ceremonies of my people will cease.

Source http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=11546

Elizardbeth II, Queen of the NWO, Ruler of the UN

Oh yeah, you think the bluebloods gave up all their power to 'democracy' do you? Bloodlines - either you have 'em or you don't. Sit on the throne or clean the throne...

Hail Caesar! Queen Gives Marching Orders To The UN
Rense.com

Regarding the queens speech to the United Nations, we were told by the British Mission to the United Nations that the queen "Will be taking a global perspective. She will touch on progress made since she was last here and challenges that remain."

For a woman who says she is not head of any country-only titular head of state of 16 countries including Australia, Canada and New Zealand and the nominal representative of 54 governments in the British Commonwealth, who is fooling who? Why should be the people of the world listen to a little old lady from Britain? The answer is because her hereditary demands it.

The visit by the queen, which was billed as low key-a five hour visit-was designed to get the global agenda of sustainable development and climate control back on track and to make a statement. Nothing the queen does is low key as every visit, and every word has a meaning and a goal for total control.

First let's take a look at the queen herself. According to Who Owns the World by Kevin Cahill, the queen is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land that equals one sixth of the earth's non-ocean surface. She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries and who owns countries that re not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies-like Norway, Belgium, and Denmark, where no such claim is made. The value of her holdings is approximately $33T, more than the estimated value of all of the earth's natural resources which is estimated to be $25T.

Secondly, the physical structure of the United Nations and its agenda represents the completion of the dream and aspirations of British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes to return the United States and the rest of the world back under British rule. He felt that "too little of the globe was British territoryand if we had retained Americathere would be millions more of English living."

In Rhode's 1877 will, it says

"the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British
Empire, the consolidation of the whole Empire, the inauguration of a system of colonial
Representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed
Members of the Empire," which may well ultimately be achieved, by the Roundtable which
"publicized the idea of and the name 'British Commonwealth of Nations.'"

The executors of Rhodes' six wills had concerns and fears about what kind of structure all of this should take. According to Dr. Carroll Quigley in his The Anglo-American Establishment published in 1981, they concluded that they would have to transform the British Empire into "a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League of Nations." The United Nations is the successor to the League of Nations and the Commonwealth is inside the U.N. In other words, we are there. The representatives to the UN should have greeted her, "Hail Caesar"!

Full Article

The general British indifference to the monarchy is because they are perceived to be nothing more than a relic or an antique, a tourist attraction that brings in more money from gullible foreigners - primarily Stockholm Syndrome royal loving Americans (I remember that from years ago when I visited Queenie's house in London, long before all this info reached me, all the American tourists who seemed to love the royalty surprised me) - than they cost us to pay for their luxury.

If it was even suspected by the average serf in the street that the royals had actual power, things might be very different.

Sooooo...hello! They do have real power! If looked upon from another angle, one might suspect them of being the highest leaders of the NWO...is Rothschild himself a Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sock puppet? Or to get higher than that are we going out of the human realm, oh boy you better believe that...

A Little Exercise in Word Switching - Das Racist?

I don't know what your opinions are on what constitutes 'racism' to you, if you believe something is acceptable or not. But surely we can all agree that what is good for the goose, is good for the gander? Political correctness, much as I dislike it in many ways, at least claims to be all about the much-treasured ideal of equality, does it not?

So without further ado...(the discerning reader should spot within seconds which words I have switched and guess which words have been replaced!)

Teens tackle hot topic of dating
um...Stormfront?, 1 July 2010

Do Portland’s White teenagers think it’s racist to date only other Whites? What about their views on the Bernie Madoff scandal, or thoughts on the approaching 2012 Mayan doomsday?

These are some of the topics that are fodder for conversation at Hot Pizza and Hot Topics, sponsored by Kesser Pan-Europa and led by Bishop Kenneth Brodkin.

At the last Hot Topics session before breaking for the summer, 17 teenagers—10 girls and seven boys from Kesser, Polen, Wieles and more—gathered around pizza from The Café at the J to talk about interfaith marriage and dating.

“It’s certainly very applicable to my life,” laughs Minna O’Brien, 17, a PCC student who is transferring this fall to OSU to study mechanical engineering. “Just from a practical standpoint, in dating Whites, the pool gets kind of small, you know?”

Ben Smith, 15, says he dates non-Whites, but will only marry another White.

“I want my kids to be raised White,” says the Catlin Gabel student, whose older brother is engaged to a convert to Christianity. “But dating at my age, I’m like, non-Whites, it’s fine.”

The evening’s discussion starts with a question of whether Christianity is a race or a culture. The teenagers also engage with the bishop about the definition of race and common human ancestry, Christian views of marriage, and what the Bible says about interfaith dating and marriage.

“Marriage is a personal lifestyle choice,” protests one young man. “It’s not racism.”

O’Brien chimes in that dating only Whites is “no more racist than only dating Republicans.”

While one boy says that teenaged dating is an opportunity to find out what you like and what you don’t like in relationships to help inform more serious choices down the road, another cautioned that dating non-Whites early in life might be a slippery slope toward marrying outside Christendom as an adult.

“The more you can share with your spouse is a deep and wonderful thing,” says Bishop Brodkin, noting that same-faith marriage is good not only for Christians but for people of other religions as well. “Being in a marriage that’s not working is a tremendous source of misery.”

If Christianity is just a culture, the bishop argues, then interfaith marriage and dating gets a little confusing. People from different cultures—e.g., Turkish and Iranian—marry and raise families together all the time.

“The best that you can kind of hope for is that they understand that they don’t understand,” O’Brien says of her experience dating non-Whites. “Kind of a respectful confusion.”

But beggars can’t be choosers, she adds. “It would certainly be easier to date Whites. There aren’t a lot of White guys, and there aren’t a lot of White guys asking, compared to the number of non-White guys who are.”

“We strongly encourage young people to date and to marry White. Their greatest chance at a long-term meaningful Christian life and White identity for them and their children clearly comes through a marriage and a home which is shared with someone with similar values,” Brodkin says. “We feel that their long-term success is going to be greatly, greatly enhanced by marrying someone White.”

Brodkin says the point of these discussions is to help young people think independently as they grapple with some of life’s most important questions and decisions.

“As a church, what we want to do is try to not tell them what to do, but to be there as they’re making these decisions, and to be able to help them realize how much potential they have, and how much Christianity can enrich the decisions that they’re making,” says Brodkin. “The gift of being young is that you have the power to effect the rest of your lives.”

Full and Original Article - yeah it's not really some white group. LMAO. Can you imagine that. The mainstream and the white antifas would lynch them! (I couldn't resist, sorry)

As usual, I just note the hypocrisy. Nothing more. I actually don't have a problem with this kind of group, it's their right to direct their own lives how they see fit, but the double standards are there for all who care to see them. I also like these kind of topics because by writing about them I am poking at perhaps the deepest levels of the reader's Corporate-Communist state-school/MSM programming. I admit it's fun. But also necessary.

David Icke and Alex Jones 8/July/10

Say what you must about either or both of them, there are legitimate criticisms to be made, and they should be made, but the truth is the sheer reach these individuals have outweighs any flaws in what they say or don't say.

Note - They bring up Albert Pike's Three World Wars letter in the last part. Very timely, I hope not.



Part 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5

May the rabble rousing continue. Surface!

On "Supporting the Troops" - Lions led by Etonite Mosquitoes

When public support for a war is floundering, here comes the usual government tactic - shielding themselves with the very young volunteers who they send to war.

Just wondering, rhetorically of course - has the Etonian call me Dave ever been shot at? I mean, I haven't, but then it's not me who assumes the official responsibility of ordering other people into harm's way. Lead by example with your slingshot, King David of British Israel! Can you imagine that?!

Cameron calls on national support for troops
TMN News

Next Saturday is Armed Forces Day, when celebrations will be held around the country with the main event being held in Cardiff. Prime Minister Cameron is calling for the country to show its “social responsibility” and give its thanks.

Fresh from his trip to Afghanistan, the Prime Minister said, “These people know all about duty – they’ve lived it. Now we as a country must do our duty by them. Over the past few years there’s been an increasing appreciation of what our Armed Forces do. But still I believe that we should do more.”

He continued, “But supporting our Armed Forces isn’t just a government responsibility – it’s a social responsibility.”

“In the First World War those at home didn’t just sing, ‘Keep the home fires burning’, they practised it.”

“In the Second World War, the military occupied a huge place in the national consciousness, partly because everyone knew someone in uniform.”

“I believe as a country at war we should see the same appreciation today, with the military front and centre of our national life once again.”

Full Article

Etonites (Parasites) - call me Dave is no.2, and of course mad hatter Boris Johnston is no.8.

See, there are many many problems with this simplistic outlook, and nothing disappoints me more than seeing the physical and mental waste of some of the best people in society while other non-enlisted braindead zombies walk around parroting "support the troops".

"If we don't fight them over there, they'll fight us over here" (who? Afghan tribesmen? Or Al-CIAda?)

"They're bringing freedom" (yeah like Karzai the puppet dictator, the coalition-protected poppy trade, and a million dead in Iraq, free dumb indeed)

"They have to finish their mission now they've been there so long" (do they have a mission, first, and second this exact same person would have said before the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq that no-one could predict how it would turn out so we should all shut up and trust the government. Hypocrites!)

And the best one, my personal favourite, full marks for demogogy, hands up if you recognise this one:

"If we leave now then the Islamists will win" (no words can describe...)

This is a classic PR nonsense. Like all the Israel lobbyists always use the term "Hamas" and never use the term "Palestinians" unless they are saying "Palestinians are oppressed by Hamas" (which they are btw, there's a morsel of truth) or "Palestinians don't exist". As in, "we're conducting military operations against Hamas". Liars.

We have done the same! There are no "Iraqis" or "Afghans", well there are but those are the slavish civilians who submit to their colonial occupiers. All those who resist US-British-Israel occupation are of course terrorists, insurgents, Islamists, radicals - no not Iraqi Army veterans with families taking up arms because their country has been bombed, starved and invaded over a decade and a half by UN sanctions, US air power and then coalition tanks, oh no. After all that he picks up a rifle and dares to shoot at his oppressors? Terrorist! Why is he so full of hatred for our free dumb, hmm?

(a thousand words come to mind?)

This is the problem with simply 'supporting the troops' when the orders the troops receive are downright evil. There is nothing that can excuse the sanctions enforced on Iraq which killed half a million children, it is genocide. (although if we believe Madeleine Allbright, it was "worth it"!)

Would I have supported the troops in Nazi Germany or Bolshevik Russia, or what about North Vietnam or North Korea during those artificial UN-caused intra-national wars? Would you?

I would have.

Let me explain.

I have always appreciated and valued the courage and self-sacrifice of the soldier. Yes most are and always have been good people. They're just boys, many younger than myself. You think the average German or Russian in WW2 was concerned by anything more than his own people and his own survival? And his perceived duty to his nation based on the particular line he had received from his national media. And so did British and American troops obediently subjugate Iraq. Brave? Yes. Courageous? Yes. Used? YOU BETCHA.

So where does one stand when the orders troops receive are downright evil, but again despite everything, despite the satanic military hierachy, the majority of them are decent people who essentially, unwittingly, are bodyguards for the most evil people on the planet?

Is not the best form of supporting the troops, in this case, telling them how they are being manipulated? Even if the truth hurts (and it bloody does)?

Trust me, the Islamists aren't going to 'win' (they can't win, just like Hitler could never win no matter how hard he didn't try), because they are a contrived enemy, a bogeyman created to control the masses and reach a predetermined outcome.

If you want to defeat Islamic terrorism, shut down MI6, CIA, the ISI and Mossad. Who knows, you may just find some odd things about who is producing these 'lone nuts' who are just 'radicalised' and are 'waging war on us'.

If you're concerned about Islamification at home, which compared to bigger things (like the prospect of genuine poverty) I'm not that much really but I understand, then bring the troops home, and use them to stop mosque building. LMAO!

Seriously though. All those single-issue Islam-hating sites, because they are Zionist-war-lobby run or Zionist-war-lobby sympathisers, ignore this truth. How can we criticise the Islamification of Europe, when we are in the process of forcibly subjugating several Muslim countries? At the moment we have no credibility.

I would support the troops 100% if they just stuck a big fat middle finger up at these arsehole Oxbridge Tavistock psychopaths, upped sticks and came home of their own accord. Yes, then we'd see who really supports the troops and who is just a chickenhawk traitor.

How The Venetian System Was Transplanted Into England

As a follow-up to the WG Tarpley discussion of Venice I linked the other day, here's his take on the money magickians moving from Venice to London.

"The oligarchical system of Great Britain is not an autochthonous product of English or British history. It represents rather the tradition of the Babylonians, Romans, Byzantines, and Venetians which has been transplanted into the British Isles through a series of upheavals. The status of Britain as the nation foutué of modern history is due in particular to the sixteenth and seventeenth century metastasis into England and Scotland of the Venetian oligarchy along with its philosophy, political forms, family fortunes, and imperial geopolitics. The victory of the Venetian party in England between 1509 and 1715 built in turn upon a pre-existing foundation of Byzantine and Venetian influence..."

http://www.abjpress.com/tarpb1.html