More Evidence Gender is Biological

The Commies like to tell us that gender is a social construct. This is of course very convenient for them, as it means that we have all been brainwashed into our gender roles by the big corporations and by parents. Maybe little Timmy really wans to wear a dress, but his nasty oppressive parents must have stopped him from doing so. And thus the dungaree wearing feminists will liberate him by making him wear a dress. Okay maybe I'm exaggerating, but only a little.

My point is that gender roles are deliberately distorted by these commie types and their 'useful idiots', based on the false 'scientific' claim that gender is a social construct held in place by constant conditioning. It's just nature. Don't fight nature, that is all I have to say to every - single - Frankfurterschule bullet point. Feminism destroys women and men.

Young Female Chimpanzees Treat Sticks as Dolls: Growing Evidence of Biological Basis for Gender-Specific Play in Humans

ScienceDaily (Dec. 22, 2010) — Researchers have reported some of the first evidence that chimpanzee youngsters in the wild may tend to play differently depending on their sex, just as human children around the world do.

Scientists at Harvard University and Bates College say female chimpanzees appear to treat sticks as dolls, carrying them around until they have offspring of their own. Young males engage in such behavior much less frequently.

The new work by Sonya M. Kahlenberg and Richard W. Wrangham, described this week in the journal Current Biology, provides the first suggestive evidence of a wild non-human species playing with rudimentary dolls, as well as the first known sex difference in a wild animal's choice of playthings.

The two researchers say their work adds to a growing body of evidence that human children are probably born with their own ideas of how they want to behave, rather than simply mirroring other girls who play with dolls and boys who play with trucks. Doll play among humans could have its origins in object-carrying by earlier apes, they say, suggesting that toy selection is probably not due entirely to socialization.

"In humans, there are robust sex differences in children's toy play, and these are remarkably similar across cultures," says Kahlenberg, a lecturer in biology at Bates who conducted the research as a postdoctoral researcher in Wrangham's group at Harvard. "While socialization by elders and peers has been the primary explanation, our work suggests that biology may also have an important role to play in activity preferences."

In 14 years of data on chimpanzee behavior at the Kibale National Park in Uganda, Kahlenberg and Wrangham counted more than 100 examples of stick-carrying. In many cases young females weren't using the sticks for foraging or fighting, as adults sometimes do, or for any other discernable purpose.

Some young chimpanzees carried sticks into the nest to sleep with them and on one occasion built a separate nest for the stick. The researchers even witnessed the animals playing a version of the "airplane game," lying on their backs with their "offspring" balanced across their upraised hands.

"We have seen juveniles occasionally carrying sticks for many years, and because they sometimes treated them rather like dolls, we wanted to know if in general this behavior tended to represent something like playing with dolls," says Wrangham, the Ruth Moore Professor of Biological Anthropology at Harvard. "If the doll hypothesis was right we thought that females should carry sticks more than males do, and that the chimpanzees should stop carrying sticks when they had their first offspring. We have now watched enough young chimpanzees to test both points."

Kahlenberg and Wrangham's observations included a few adult females carrying sticks, but only before they became mothers for the first time. Their finding clearly links juvenile play to adult behavior, since female chimpanzees, not males, carry infants more than 99 percent of the time.

"Obviously in humans there is a huge role for peers, parents, and others to influence a child's preferences for different kinds of toys, and the same may well be true of chimpanzees," Wrangham says. "One of the things that makes our finding fascinating is that there is little evidence of anything comparable in other chimpanzee communities, which raises the possibility that the chimpanzees are copying a local behavioral tradition. So this may be a lovely case of biological and social influences being intertwined."

Full Article

Meanwhile, in class 2B... hahahaha, names are fun. AAA tag team. ;)

The Death of Free Will

"THE LAST NAIL OF SO-CALLED SCHOOL REFORM is being struck in the coffin of traditional American education which made our nation the envy of the Free World and which produced famous scientists, engineers, mathematicians, writers, artists, musicians, doctors, etc.

The reform is not new. It started in the early 1900s when John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s Director of Charity for the Rockefeller Foundation, Frederick T. Gates, set up the Southern Education Board. In 1913 the organization was incorporated into the General Education Board. These boards set in motion “the deliberate dumbing down of America”. In Frederick T. Gates’ “The Country School of Tomorrow” Occasional Papers No. 1 (General Education Board, New York, 1913) was a section entitled “A Vision of the Remedy” in which he wrote:

“Is there aught a remedy for this neglect of rural life? Let us, at least, yield ourselves to the gratifications of a beautiful dream that there is. In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.”

The above quote sounds like something from one of the public/private school-to-work/tax-exempt foundation partnerships involved in the Reinventing Schools Coalition agenda, as well as other innocuous sounding current-day initiatives that are being implemented across the nation."

Source Page

Full Article (PDF)

(image source)

You try telling someone in this country that we should get rid of the national curriculum. They will recoil in horror. After all, how would we make sure everyone got taught the right things? A very scary proposition. Best just let government decide for us. Or even better, delude ourselves into thinking 'we are the government', as many state worshippers say. Certainly, we are the government when we self govern. But the blackmailed/corrupt (s)elected 'representatives' are not synonymous with the people.

School is dog training for humans. I admire people who home school or otherwise help their children escape the thought gestapo mind control robots, called teachers. The only truly good teachers I had were the ones who (shock) were not robots and encouraged independent thought, and let me assure you that isn't many. The system is designed that way.

Love/Hate Mail and the Left Right Paradigm

Source

"It's a tragedy that you have 118 followers. [note: it's now 117, "Nocturnal Hermit" aka "The Propagandist" abandoned his blog suddenly (link) after reporting he had received death threats.] That's potentially 118 people being sadly mislead by a person who thinks that using words like "retarded" (no matter their lame attempts to legitimise the use of the word; no one's buying it) are kosher.

More tragic still, is that most of those followers are no doubt concerned by imperialism and globalisation - as you pose as a dissenter of both - yet lead astray with perfunctory and facile lines along the lines of "there's no difference between right and left, only levels of control" (or whatever).

Anyone with the first clue about political science and political economy can see how patently obscene that is. You should be ashamed of yourself for corrupting with such absurdities whilst posing as a sage."

First of all, the left right issue. Look here. One the one side we have Nazi Germany. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide. That is *right wing*. On the other side we have Soviet Russia. They had an all powerful state, they shot their dissenters, and they committed genocide (a fact that the Communist education system tries to minimise). This is *left wing*. Now am I really all that wrong in saying the left-right paradigm is an instrument of pointless division?

Communism IS globalisation. Communism openly states its goal is a global revolution...it's just not the one you are thinking of. Funny that the forces of imperialism, corporations and the military state, are also looking towards this goal, globalisation. You only oppose one half of globalisation not the other. What's more, any attempt to reassert national sovereignty would likely be condemned by your sort as being Racist or Fascist!

I don't 'know' much of political science or political economy. I don't know what they feed you in your textbooks. All I know is, there's a group of insane supercapitalists who run our government and run the wars and promote Fascism and Communism which are in practice very similar.

I called the students retarded because I pity them. They have indeed been 'held back', retarded, by the deliberately dumbed down education system. Retarded is the precise and correct word for this situation. But those imperialists, those corporatists, who run the wars and the military industrial complex and the banks, they couldn't possibly also run the education system could they? They couldn't possibly bankroll Communism could they? Could the same grand planners be behind murderer Che Guevara and murderer Milton Friedman?

Divide and rule. Works pretty well with these ludicrous nationalist vs antifa pantomimes on the street. Who is talking about the central bankers and their debt slave usury money that runs your life? I am, hell the whole internet is thank gawd, and they are not. (Did I mention the existence of a central bank is enshrined in the Communist Manifesto? Why's that? Not very proletarian...or revolutionary...)

How much time did the education system take to tell you about how all our money is created as a debt that we have to pay compound interest on? I can honestly say, zero, myself.

Child violence against parents on rise

(Guardian)
Children are increasingly likely to attack their parents both physically and verbally, a leading charity warns today.

Parentline Plus has received an astonishing 22,537 calls in two years from mothers and fathers struggling to cope with their aggressive offspring. Almost 7,000 spoke of incidents of physical abuse. The figures are revealed in a report by the charity today. When Family Life Hurts claims that the number and intensity of attacks is on the rise – and that mothers take the brunt of the aggression. The study cites aggressive behaviour at all ages, but says it peaks in children aged between 13 and 15.

The alarming statistics have come to light as Frank Field, the government's poverty adviser, called for children to be taught in school how to be good parents. The Labour MP will take proposals to Michael Gove, the education secretary, this week setting out how such skills could become part of the national curriculum. "It is now more difficult to raise children than it ever was – but nobody ever teaches you about parenting. It is assumed that by osmosis people will know what to do, but they don't," said Field. The politician, who is carrying out a review on poverty and life chances for the coalition government, claimed that there was little focus on parenting skills in prenatal or postnatal sessions.

Full Article

Oh dear. I suppose we should just recognise that the family is old fashioned and not suitable for these modern times. More children should be taken in by the state where there are honestly no paedophiles, we swear. What's the matter? Don't you love your children? Don't you love the government? Parenting is a privilege not a right, and you parents have failed to live up to the high standards expected of you under human rights rules. Best just hand them over to us and we can give them the psychiatric help they surely need, and you can go back to working 14 hours a day building up a pension that we have already stolen. There's a good citizen. Pat on the head for you.

(Childrens' bad behaviour has nothing to do with the fact that their diet vaccines air and water are poisoning them, and that the media schools and culture are poisoning their minds, honest! They need moar ritalin [i.e. cocaine] to hellp there spellunz.)

How Low Will The Frankfurt School Subversion Go?

(below, members of the Frankfurt School)

How men kissing each other on the lips in friendship is 'no longer taboo'

(note: this is absolute bollocks...I haven't heard or seen anything of the sort ever - these studies are produced to create the impression that everyone just looooves the new genderless world; I give people more credit than that.)

Heterosexual male students are more comfortable kissing their friends than ever before, researchers said today.

University students now see nothing wrong with showing friendship to another man through a kiss on the lips.

Researchers at the University of Bath found that 89 per cent of white undergraduate men at two UK universities and one sixth form college said they were happy to kiss another man on the lips through friendship.

They found that 36per cent of respondents had also engaged in sustained kissing, initially for shock value, but now they occurred just for 'a laugh'.

Daniel Eagles, an undergraduate at University of Bath, said he did not have a problem with kissing his male friends.

He said: 'I am comfortable to kiss my friends in situations such as their birthday or when someone scored a goal or just if we are having a laugh.

'Physical contact with your friends helps to bring you closer. I have been in a relationship with my girlfriend for more than a year and she doesn't think anything of it when I kiss my guy friends.'

Dr Eric Anderson, from the university's department of education, said: 'Heterosexual men kissing each other in friendship is an offshoot of what happens when homophobia is reduced.

'At these universities, overt homophobia has reduced to near extinction, permitting those men to engage in behaviour that was once taboo.

Full story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1324799/How-men-kissing-lips-friendship-longer-taboo.html

Now I know they promote all kinds of Cultural Marxism in academia, but honestly, do you really believe that? For instance, a friend of mine from school once told me a tale about his older brother who is now in the Army. He had a queer friend, who he 'tolerated', but once when they were drunk the foolish homosexual tried it on so to speak, and got a punch in the face. And that was the end of that story.

BBC want your stories of 'mixed race Britain'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11634840

They probably cook the numbers on this too. But what do I know.

You have a right to be 'xenophobic' to a degree. The Native Americans weren't xeno'phobic' enough, and look at what happened to them. If they had strung up Columbus when he got there, maybe they wouldn't have been near enough wiped out as they were. Their xenophilia was their undoing.

Speaking of which,

Migrants took 9 out of 10 new jobs under Labour

Nearly nine out of ten jobs created under Labour went to foreign-born workers, astonishing figures revealed last night.

Official statistics showed the vast majority of the rise in the employment total under the last Government was accounted for by workers born abroad.

Total numbers of those in work went up by two million during 13 years of Labour. But of those jobs, 1.8 million individuals were classed as ‘non-UK born’.

Just a quarter of a million declared themselves to be born in the UK.

Full story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1325013/Migrants-took-9-10-jobs-created-Labour.html

"Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society" - D James Kennedy

What is the Frankfurt School?
Freud and the Frankfurt School

250,000 Racist Children!

Uh oh. Better report them for re-education, er I mean counselling.

It was teachers who were forced to report these incidents. How on earth do the teachers go along with this crap.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1314438/3-year-olds-labelled-bigots-teachers-250k-children-accused-racism.html

(don't tell me you haven't heard of Wonder Showzen, lol!)

I would like to see a breakdown by ethnicity, of a) the children who were reported for racism, and b) the reported victim of racism.

"The more we seek to measure racism, the more it seems to grow".

Funny.

Sounds like a social construct designed to control the indigenous.

Anyway, leave it to a decent black guy to tell the truth. Good for him. Black people are used as political pawns by the Marxists, and are expected to embrace the victim mentality they have been assigned. Even black people (never mind any others) who dare breach this victim paradigm, however, are often labeled 'self hating' by the Marxists, and shamed for supposedly being 'part of the problem' (the racism problem) and having an 'old fashioned worldview'.

Nothing old fashioned about having an authentic attitude though. Can't be a black victim - or indeed a groveling white wreck - all your life, as the Marxists would like for you.

Frank Dikotter and Alex Jones discuss Mao Worship

And the teeny tiny thing about him being history's biggest mass murderer. Davy Rockefeller's favourite.

Part 1 / 2 / 3
btw interesting fleur de lis shirt Alex. Loyal to the royal huh?

From A China Traveler by David Rockefeller, 1973

See, Che is only for wannabe Commies. Che wasn't half the Commie Mao was. Mao was a real hardcore Liberator Of The Proletariat.

Image source

And of course there is nothing Commie about the education system, just those paranoid idiots and their Communist Conspiracy theories.

Also why is it that so many Commie or left-anarchist type kids, despite often being nice people, are mentally defunct? Don't tell me you haven't noticed. John Dewey you have some explaining to do.

Retarded Communist Students vs BNP in Glasgow

Note that the BNP were there with a banner calling for troops to be brought home, hardly Nazi in any way shape or form now is it.

"BRING OUR TROOPS HOME bnp in glasgow being attacked"

Also note that the real, truly hateful people are the radicalised, brainwashed, Communist students. Retarded means hindered or held back. A fitting description of anyone who has been subjected to over a decade of (re-)edyucashun.
So who's really engaging in persecution, and anti-freedom, fascistic behaviour? Leaflet above shows Communists determined to harass anything vaguely pro-Western and anticommunist, wherever it may be.

It doesn't really matter what you think of the BNP. These demon kids are the real danger, and they absolutely will throw you in a camp if you are 'Nazi Scum', which means if you at all oppose Communism or the Green agenda. They can only repeat what the school system has filled their head with. They, simply, do not understand what is being done to them, and how they are far far more deadly than the imaginary Nazi Scum they think they are fighting.

Communists tearing down an anti-war protest banner just because it isn't a Communist anti-war protest banner. Get your head around that one.

Relevant news #1 - Britain goes Halal (in secret)
Relevant news #2 - Soldiers' memorial to be cut down
Now if that isn't symptomatic of a dying country I don't know what is.

Back when I was in 6F, the BNP came to town one day, and a lovely group called Hope Not Hate actually distributed leaflets to all in my 6F telling them to come and protest the BNP. Yeah, bring in people who know nothing except what the Communist dumbed down school system has taught them, they are the people we really need to listen to.

Hope. In a world where patriots are Nazi Scum, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength, just what is 'hope'? And what is 'hate'?

They just don't get it, but they will. Reality will mug them. Reality is a mean bitch like that. And once they do get it, all that misplaced anger will be redirected at their thought controllers.

Tricky thing, keeping the youth controlled. Can go horribly wrong, they'll go all Edelweiss on you if you force it too much.

I have to at this point mention Vigilant Citizen in a favourable manner; his site has reached one or two young people I know about who first viewed his site months ago due to the music related articles and have since, not necessarily WTFU'd, but are getting there. We need the youth to break their indoctrination, not to be future Commie/Green death squads as they are being trained for.

I Thought I Recognised Rothschild's Historian

With all the discussion of Niall Ferguson, I thought that name was familiar. The War Of The World: A New History Of The 20th Century was a favourite of mine back when I relied on TV and what little I could choke out of the school system for education. Just the other day it occurred to me whose show it was.

If you're interested and have the time (6x50mins) the series can be viewed here: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Rated R for Rothschild. ;)

Sort of halfway between the crap version of history most people think they know, and the truth. Although it's still heaving with propaganda I actually owe a little to that series. There are several points where Ferguson shows us London et al intervening in things that have nothing to do with them, but of course he very quickly passes over these moments. The discerning viewer however can fill in the blanks and see the hidden hands.

It had never occurred to me that the Communists, for instance, were just as bad as Nasty Germany, who killed for no reason other than to maintain Aryan Supremacy. I mean, yeah, a lot of people died in Commie Russia, younger AdamS reasoned, but it was because they were trying to implement a new ideal that would bring about equality and end anti-Semitism. Sadly it went badly wrong because Communist ideals were so pure that imperfect fallen humans are simply not ready for them, and we'd better settle for moderate redistributive democracy instead.

Ohhhhhh you better believe that was me.

I wonder how many of today's lefties think like that.

I wonder how many would admit to thinking like that.

Those Annoying Zionist Editors on Wikipedia

Here's the factory where they are mass produced. lol



YOU are the ones having a hard time getting your story told? Hold on one second. I was not taught about the Holodomor in school. I was not taught about the Great Leap Forward in school. The Rape of Nanking. Not even the Armenian genocide. And I damn sure was never taught about "Eisenhower's death camps", naturally. However there was one certain similar event I was beat over the head with time and again; can you guess which one? My favourite part was Anne's diary which was written in ball point pen, in 1944 no less...

"the first ballpoint pens went on sale at Gimbels department store in New York City on 29 October 1945...Similar pens went on sale before the end of the year in England, and by the next year in most of Europe."

The more megaphones you get, the less people listen and the more they get suspicious. Yet you somehow fail to realise this. Anyway, I'm not stopping you - continue...

Feminists Move In For The Kill

Alternet - 5 Things Society Unfairly Expects of Men

This story reminds me of when I was 8 or 9. See, our school had a male headteacher who would rightly let us play football (with a tennis ball I recall, lol) at breaks. Then he left and was replaced by a short haired woman and before long football was banned, because 'girls might get hurt', and the boys were only allowed to play with skipping ropes and other girly stuff. I could never skip, and would not because some feminist says so.

That's real feminism. It's not really about liberating women from being told that they should get back in the kitchen. Or if it was then feminism should have ended about 20 years ago at least. It's about the inversion of gender, like the inverted pentagram. All Marxist affiliated ideology is about fighting against nature, a fight in which ordinary people become your enemies. Now that's an unwinnable fight, trying to bite the hand that feeds you.

The genuine feminists must be horrified at what has become of women (and you can't blame 'the patriarchy' or 'men' for that, can you?). It is women who drink more than men, and rather than rejecting their objectifcation by the corporate illusion-masters, they have largely embraced it. Women are offered the choice between being a man hater or basically being a whore. And who can blame them for hating men, after all it is feminism that has told men they need to abdicate their 'sexist' role also. A dialectic perpetual motion machine.

And now feminists say, "We support men in feminism". No you don't you Commie freaks! You support men abdicating their gender just as you have done to women. You support androgyny and the belief that gender is conditioned. You just think you've got women under your thumb and now you're trying to finish off any spirit of resistance among the men.

I'm not sure what woke me up but flipping open my psychology textbook to be told that gender roles are conditioned, and we should experiment by trying to turn boys into girls and vice versa made me wonder who or what is coming up with this crap and what they are doing trying to invert everything. Gender roles are inborn and that is obvious. Both men and women are damaged by corporate feminist anti-gender lies.

And people wonder why everything in the world is f'd up...

Aaron Russo: Nick Rockefeller said feminism was planned to break up the family and get women into the workplace so the bankers could rake in more taxes -

State Eugenics is back, who do we forcibly sterilise first?

I would have said that the suggestion to sterilise the poor was just a rare exception, but recalling previous opinions of Guardian and Daily Mail readers, I have no doubt that this opinion is widely held among more self righteous members of the herd.

Of course, it would never be you, would it? It's always be them, over there, the rabble, the scum, who would be on the receiving end. Elitist bastards. Marxists might belong to the most murderous non-religious cult in history, but they do have a point about class war.

I know that many ordinary supporters of the cradle to grave state have damn good intentions, but whatever the truth about the morality and pragmatism of this system, heck I'm not sure about that myself, the real eugenicists (whose aim is dumbing people down, not building them up) have benefited tremendously from it. Yet it's funny, all those breeders on benefits, and we still can't acheive replacement fertility?

That is the real eugenics, and all you self righteous presumably middle class types who wouldn't mind sterilising the unworthy peasantry, you are yourselves victims of it. Eat up! Every mouthful you take from your BPA lined plastic containers and cans makes you a little more infertile. Who's laughing now? Well it's certainly not your children 'cause you won't be having any. Not so funny! Malthus finds it Hitlerious though. It's for the Earth, you understand. Hurry up and die so you stop consuming things you don't really need, like oxygen.

Eugenics is the product of people who have lost respect for human life and do not see themselves as being interconnected with the rest of humanity. Soulless creatures. Not atheists, just negative eugenicists.

PS: I don't use the term 'eugenicist' as a pejorative because really everyone is a eugenicist in practice - partner selection is a blatantly eugenic process. So I specify state eugenics, i.e. forcing people to comply with eugenic processes, and I emphasise both conventional negative eugenics (the sterilisation or worse of 'unfit' individuals) and what I describe as 'real eugenics' (the actual aim of most social engineers, which is to REDUCE the health and intellect of a society, not INCREASE it like the naive popular conception of eugenics says), as being the evil eugenics that we rightly consider to be nefarious. Why would tyrants want to kill off the 'weak'? No, they want to kill off anyone who might resist them. That's what the Commies did. That's what the school system's real purpose is.

Study: Ethnic diversity at school has a negative effect on learning

This flies in the face of Western government policies which often go to significant lengths to increase ethnic diversity in schools

"Study: Ethnic diversity at school has a negative effect on learning

Fifteen-year-old pupils from schools with high ethnic diversity perform worse than comparable pupils from schools with homogenous student populations. This applies not just to the immigrant children, but also to the pupils from the country in question. For the latter group, the negative effect is strongest in school systems with a hierarchy of school types, such as the Dutch and German systems.

What’s more, the number and origin of the immigrant pupils also plays an important role. Having a higher proportion of pupils from Islamic countries at a given school negatively influences the performance of all pupils at that school. But in contrast, a higher share of pupils from South and East Asia has a positive effect. This is just one of Jaap Dronkers’s conclusions from his empirical research using international PISA data, which he discusses in his inaugural lecture.

The educational performance of immigrant pupils gets a boost from having a higher proportion of such pupils at a particular school – but only when the fellow immigrant pupils come from the same region. This applies particularly to immigrant children from Islamic countries and from South and East Asia. This positive effect of ethnic homogeneity in schools might explain the attraction of Islamic schools, for example, or white or Jewish schools."

Full Article

Black French Serial Rapist's Defence: Racism! (time to end white guilt)

Unbelieveable. Perhaps we should pat him on the back and apologise to him for his difficult upbringing, which clearly caused him to rape and, in his words, "humiliate" fifteen white women because he hated white people? (Which, by the way, ought by any objective standard to be classed as a clear-cut hate crime, but I doubt it will have been, somehow)



My patience with this race card bullshit snapped recently. I'm tired of it. The double standard I mean. Tired of it. Again, though, we must ask who benefits from this grey squirrel/red squirrel game.

I just read some comments on a video about white poverty due to institutional anti-white discrimination in the so-called "Rainbow Nation" of South Africa, and there were white Europeans on there honestly saying that it's OK and that we deserve to be dominated by other peoples for a while because we have been sooo eeevil. (what, other races practiced slavery including the locals in pre-colonial Africa, and whites have been Slaves/Slavs at times too.)

The fundamental goal of the NWO is to destroy Western civilisation, the bastion of freedom and decent standards of living, so that the whole world can basically go back to a medieval feudalist style existence. (Only this time it will be cloaked in Green.)

I want Africans to develop Africa into a successful continent. I would like nothing more than for Arabs in the Middle East to liberate themselves from theocracy. And incase you haven't noticed, I would like Whites and Western civilisation to survive too, but rather than being an example to the rest of the world, we are on a road to self destruction, partially because we have convinced ourselves we are are a cancer on the Earth.

Well, we didn't entirely convince ourselves of our own volition. The Marxist-manipulated education system did that...track the source from there if you dare...

Generation "Me"

Insofar as I can tell we are afflicted with a crisis which goes beyond the physical; it is also psychological and definitely spiritual. But who's to blame?

via ZionistGoldReport

Today's College Students Lack Empathy
Yahoo News

College students today are less likely to "get" the emotions of others than their counterparts 20 and 30 years ago, a new review study suggests.

Specifically, today's students scored 40 percent lower on a measure of empathy than their elders did.

The findings are based on a review of 72 studies of 14,000 American college students overall conducted between 1979 and 2009.

"We found the biggest drop in empathy after the year 2000," said Sara Konrath, a researcher at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research.

The study was presented this week at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science in Boston.

Full Article

I can tell you, even in my experience the change can be seen in just a few years of young school age kids. I hypothesise that the ever increasing exposure to videogames at even preschool ages is virtually the sole cause of some children going feral, perhaps along with paedophilophobia, which is designed to keep everyone indoors under parental or CCTV supervision, because of course if little Johnny or Madeleine goes beyond the front door they will immediately be abducted by either aliens or that suspicious balding middle aged man wearing the anime T-shirt. Best to let them spend their formative years under house arrest then, that will really help their development...

(Shank, btw, in its modern context, is slang amongst British youth, and refers to an improvised knife e.g. one made from scrap metal or broken glass, or to the act of wounding someone with such a weapon. And that is actually a real film, apparently - it sounds like a documentary...)

Do we blame the young themselves, the little bastards? The big media? The school system? The parents? The desensitisation to violence? The bombardment with pictures of war, famine et al? The stress of the mandatory "modern world"? The disconnect with nature and the old ways perhaps? How about Holly/BollyWood and GayBoy Mansion? (How are adult male characters usually portrayed in modern films? What do the kids always do? They kick Daddy in the nuts, and we laugh. They're just letting you know, in their own little way, how the family is being destroyed by design, but few ever notice this.) How about the effects of a poisonous diet which - believe me - our superiors do not emulate; or, phone masts blasting out at the same frequency as the human brain?

One thing that Kamau said correctly was that "they want you dead". What he and his likely AK-7th Century Convert backers did not tell you is that it isn't just 'brothas', oh no. Doesn't work like that and it never did. But they as in "they live we sleep" do want you dead. And him too, of course, once his ilk have served their purpose.

But as long as it's not me, right? I'm safer if I shut up, obey and survive as a lapdog a little longer. Which brings us right back to the survey above.

School Fingerprints Children Who Borrow Books

Seeing this stuff happen, while in full awareness of where the game ends, is surreal

Children, 4, 'to be fingerprinted to borrow school books from library'
by Andrew Hough for The Telegraph

Students in Manchester are having their thumbprints digitally transformed into electronic codes, which can then be recognised by a computer program.

Under the scheme, pupils swipe a bar code inside the book they want borrow then press their thumb on to a scanner to authorise the loan. Books are returned in the same way.

Full Article

Criticism of Rand Paul Reveals The Real Racists

Opposition to government regulation of who businesses choose to deal with isn't racist



Rand Paul has come under reactionary criticism for stating his opposition to one particular part of the US Civil Rights Act, specifically the rule that businesses must comply with the same anti-discrimination law as the government. Oh, they think they've got him on this one...are we ready...OMG RACISSS!!!

It's pitiful really.

Consider this example. A business decides they don't want to serve blacks. What will then happen to that business? It will be shamed, boycotted, and most likely driven out of business or at least will incur major losses of both customers and public image.

In the modern era, by contrast, businesses are falling over themselves to appear tolerant and diverse. Why is this? (Clue: NOT because the government made a rule.)

The answer is, it's what the people want. Giving people what they want in the marketplace is good for business.

However, if you believe the people who think they've uncovered a bogeyman 'racist' here, most people can't wait to provoke people of other races by refusing to do business with them. Who is the one thinking backwardly here?

Oh, and of course, classic rule: whites are the only racists. See how quickly the insinuations of 'white' domination are raised? Although, could it not just as easily be a black owned business discriminating against white people? Actually, I wonder what some of these government schooled commies would say to that - a black or arab owned business refusing to serve white people? I bet they'd remind us that diversity is important in a multicultural society and that opposing such a business would be 'intolerant'.

Seriously. "White privilege" as taught widely at government schools is the most racist, defamatory concept present in western society today. It disgusted me when I encountered it in education; ironically most white kids are eager to believe that they must pay for the sin of being part of an allegedly 'oppressive' racial group.

I must be missing out; what privileges am I entitled to? I would like to be cut in on this white privilege deal, thank you very much. If, of course, it really does exist.

And so we have uncovered the real racists (they often call themselves 'progressives', ironically...are we in our promised 'post-racial' utopia yet, by the way? What ever would you fall back on when losing an argument if there was no more racism?). The truth hurts.

I for one respect all people, but I am not 'guilty', neither am I 'privileged', just for being white!

A Government Takeover, Not A Muslim One

Playing arabs and whites off against each other, as I said

Parents' outrage as Catholic school children told 'dress as a Muslim for mosque trip - or you will be branded a truant'
Daily Mail

A Catholic schoolgirl has been branded a 'truant' by her teachers after she refused to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque.

Staff had ordered 14-year-old Amy Owen and her classmates to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote 'community cohesion.'

Parents at the 1,100 pupil Ellesmere Port Catholic High School in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire were also told they were each required to make a £3 contribution towards the trip for all Year Nine students.

But when Amy refused to dress in Muslim attire for the visit to Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool, staff warned her about rules and said refusal would mean non attendance which would then be marked down as an 'unauthorised absence.'

In a stern letter to her family with words in block capitals and underlined, the school's headmaster Peter Lee said the visit was 'as compulsory as a geography field trip.'

He added: 'There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.

'The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement. None of us would relish that.

'Whilst I may not require you to pay for this I must require your child to participate.'

It is believed up to ten other families from Amy's Year 9 classes also refused to dress as Muslims and were marked down in the truanting register.

But Amy's mother Michelle Davies, 34, a home help said: 'It's like they're putting a gun to your head - either you go to a mosque, or you're marked down as an unauthorised absence on your record - that's it no two ways about it.

Full Article

Now, there are racist/theocratic Muslim arabs out there, certainly. But 'they' are not taking over the country any more than WASPs and the EDL are.

Look who is doing this to us, really. It's the state, not Muslims themselves (in this case at least). The state bureaucracy is filled with predominantly white people, frankly. It is the state that is engaging in this kind of crap, not to encourage 'cohesion' as they call it, but to discourage it.

The mindless drones that like to pose as 'teachers', or other authority figures, may well enforce this rubbish thinking it's for the 'greater good' when really it is designed to provoke YOU to go back into your little box of racial and religious division, as well as removing your freedom. It's a very simple game and unfortunately the human beings usually lose to supremacist arabs, jews, blacks and whites. Because nobody can resist a good old tribal war.

(Admitting it is the first step. Sometimes I think it would be better to kick all the immigrants out. And then I check myself - reptillian brain momentarily taking over, thinking on my behalf? You bet.)

The physical body and its DNA may be awesome, but it's not who you really are, just your vehicle. Everyone is unique on the 'inside', esoterically. To hell with the sycophantic, divisionist PC gay/race/gender 'tolerance' agenda! And stop demanding to teach 4 year olds about homosexuality, you perverted freaks!

Who's Behind Recent Psychological Attacks In Schools?

by Keelan Balderson, wideshut.co.uk

Many were shocked at my recent article entitled Psychological Attacks Coming To A Primary School Near You, but it is now abundantly clear that there is an agenda to stage events and only reveal them as hoaxes hours or even days later, after the children have been left traumatized.

Full Article

Are you Normal? What is Normal?

I recall a particular time when I was studying psychology, and the class was discussing how to define abnormal behaviour, since that is the foundation of psychology/psychiatry - to diagnose people with abnormal behaviour. This was probably about six months before my sorry self finally decided that the rabbit hole was preferable to the matrix so to speak, and this incident was a key realisation that led me in that direction.

We were shown a slideshow of different characters and people, both real and fictional, and we had to decide whether we would class them as normal or abnormal. There were characters like Shrek, King Kong, etc, as well as an amputee soldier, I think an albino person, and various other 'unusual' people.

The issue I took was with what exactly the definition of abnormal was. See, many of my peers were reluctant to classify, for example, the amputee soldier as 'abnormal', because it was 'not nice' to do so, but I insisted that all were abnormal because it is, statistically, not what you would expect when meeting a random person. I was viewed as cold or uncaring for taking this viewpoint...but, I reasoned, what is normal anyway? Who is normal? Is that the pinnacle of humanity, the one thing every living soul desires to be, normal?

I realised the popular conception of 'abnormal' was not based on statistics, but on herd mentality. Those deemed 'abnormal' by my classmates were the ones who were to be shunned from the collective. So, the more sinister characters, the shifty ones like the fictional villains, they were abnormal, while everyone else was not to be called 'abnormal' because that is 'mean'.

Yet, I do not shun someone because they are 'abnormal', nor do I accept people on the grounds that they are 'normal'. No-one is normal. Everyone is unique! This is the herd mentality at work. Everyone wants to be normal so that they will be accepted, and they accept other people on the basis of their 'normality' or otherwise. Self-perpetuating conformity.

Something is wrong with this system!

If we are all striving to be 'normal', then we are allowing ourselves to be controlled by whoever defines what is normal and what is abnormal. And that is the education system, the television, the media, the entertainment world, the corporations, the bright lights and flashing colours.

Bringing it back to the original concept of psychoanalysis, yes there are people who are mentally ill, a danger to others and so on. But I do believe, in the vast majority of cases, the trend is to overproject the scale of mental illness, not underestimate it.

The idea that abnormal behaviour is a sign that something is wrong with you is usually false. It is designed to inhibit you from being you, and to make you become someone else's opinion, to mould your wonderful and amazing self into the tiny shell, or cell, that the corporate world has made for you; the glass and metal cage, the mannequin, the magazine cover. You want to be 'normal', but in the process you have forgetten that you are you.

So, if you are declared 'abnormal' by the insane consensus reality that governs this world, be not offended! Better to be you than a slave of the herd, and a clone of your masters' will!