The Land of Easy Money

...
'The land of easy money': How the Somali woman who lied to claim asylum and £250,000 in benefit handouts described Britain

A woman who lied about being gang raped in Somalia to claim more than £250,000 in benefits had moved to Britain after boasting it was the ‘land of easy money’.

Ayan Abdulle was jailed this week after investigators discovered that the story she used to win asylum – and later UK citizenship – was a pack of lies.

Now the Daily Mail can reveal the full scale of her fraud and how easily she was able to milk the benefits system for years.

Abdulle, who also used the fake name Amina Muse and is from Somalia, was living in Gothenburg when the authorities insisted immigrants learn Swedish if they wanted to continue to claim handouts.

She told a friend she couldn’t be bothered and moved to England where she knew it would be far easier to collect benefits.

She made up a story to gain asylum and gave herself and five of her six children false names and dates of birth, fraudulently claiming benefits on both the real and invented identities.

And she somehow managed to continue claiming benefits in Sweden for three years after leaving.

Abdulle was born in Mogadishu in 1969 but moved to Sweden in 1994.

Her friend Hodan Abdullahi Egal, who lives in Gothenburg, said yesterday: ‘Ayan liked life here. She never worked, just took things easy and spent her time meeting up with old friends from Mogadishu.

‘But she couldn’t be bothered to learn another language. Instead she decided to move to England.

‘She said it was the land of easy money. She was convinced she would have no problems there because the system there made it far easier to collect money without proper checks.’

Abdulle arrived in London in 2004 with her first five children, now aged eight to 17, and her husband Raghe Adan, and claimed asylum under the name Amina Ali Muse.

In her application, she said militiamen had targeted her home in Somalia on December 1, 1998, shooting her brothers dead.

She claimed she had been gang raped while three months pregnant, leading to a miscarriage, and that her niece had been raped, tortured and beaten.

In fact, on that date Abdulle had been in Sweden giving birth to a daughter.
Between June 2004 and May 2010, Abdulle, who was living in Neasden, North-West London, claimed £261,358.14 in handouts.

The cash came from almost every welfare benefit possible, including income support, disability living allowance, carers’ allowance, jobseekers’ allowance, housing benefit, council tax benefit, tax credits and child benefit.

Friends and neighbours in London and Sweden said the only man who ever visited her flat was husband Adan. But in Sweden she registered herself as having married a 41-year-old named Hassan Mohamed Osman in 2007.

And the father of her sixth child, born in 2009, was given as Abdirashid Mohamed Omar, a Somali who arrived in Britain from Kenya in 2006 claiming to be the husband of Amina Muse. He was granted indefinite leave to remain as her spouse.

Abdulle was exposed when she fell out with some members of her family who revealed her fraud to the authorities.

A former friend in London said: ‘She was very secretive. I never saw her with a husband in six years. She changed her mobile phone number every day, you could not contact her.

‘She went back and forth to Gothenburg a lot and she once went to Africa, but via Sweden even though it was more expensive.’

Jailing her for four-and-a-half years at Harrow Crown Court for multiple counts of fraud and deception, Judge Stephen Holt described her actions as a professionally planned ‘cynical and dishonest manipulation of the whole system of asylum’.

Abdulle, who showed no remorse, cannot be deported after finishing her sentence because she was granted British citizenship in 2009.

Full Article

Casualty radius of the govt's secret weapon, the race replacement Nuke - White Flight in Londonistan:

Not the mortars, remember. The mortar crew. No mortar crew, no raining mortars.



Don't you see? (apart from yet another bmww combo, just to mock further)

No matter how politically correct you are, you will still be verbally lynched by the Commies, as a Racist. You have to prove you aren't Racist...but only if you're white, naturally.

Richard Holbrooke's Last Words, Repentant

"You've got to stop this war in Afghanistan."

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/14/holbrooke/

Not quite Kissinger or Brzezinski, but he still has a lot to answer for.

Speaking of which, it's frightening how these mass murderers can pass themselves off as nice people. Every time Zbig appears in the media I have to remind myself he is not just some gentle old man, he is personally responsible for hundreds of thousands if not millions of dead people in the Soviet-Afghan war which he himself engineered by inciting Afghan Muslims to attack the Soviets. Reportedly Hitler was supposed to have been very polite.

Alex Jones: The Coming Border Wars

"What's the real solution staring everyone in the face that would end almost all of this crime overnight?"



Related info:

Governor Perry supports sending troops to Mexico, if invitation is extended

American hubris kills 28000 people in Mexico (yeah that's a really slanted article but still it's one of the few that actually has information on this. Surely Mexico's problems aren't the US' fault, however the Mexican crime families are in league with the MI6/CIA drug lords, their relatives. Making drugs illegal simply gives these boys an enforced monopoly, because if anyone else deals drugs they will get arrested, but the insiders get a free pass)

Crypto Sephardis in Mexico border/Texas region

Here is one story of what is going on. It's not political correctness that causes US authorities to be so toothless against the crimes of the illegal alien drug mules etc, it's because they in essence have the same bosses, the big drug dealers aka the CIA/Mexican crime families.

Good lord even Wikipedia has an article on this now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_trafficking

There is of course no such page on MI6 drug dealing. haha. I did search that and the best I found was this. Still, what with history repeating and all, you can settle for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

58 Iraqi Christians Killed by Militants - Synthetic Holywar

This could be a false flag by the intel agencies and the Iraqi government which is NWO loyal; read between the lines of the report. Pointless slaughter by an "Al-Qaeda linked" group. SOP for a false flag event. Al-Qaeda are just a bunch of MI6-Mossad-CIA clowns who pop up in all the right places.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39945190/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/

The social engineers promote the Holywar in many ways, if not via this sort of incident then via the many media events that promote the wildest confrontational Christians and Muslims, eg Anjem Choudary, or the 9/11 quran burning.

See, I have great sympathy for the Muslims and indeed all those who have been killed, subjugated, poisoned and degraded by this Britain-Israel-USA-NATO imperial aggression (not forgetting the white Serbs also killed and DU-ified by NATO, who the lefty antiwar types often overlook). But I am not fooled by the idea that Muslims are just innocent angels who want peace and love. OK some are, many however are not. And when they immigrinvade Europe and call for Sharia in their mosques, and bring their disgusting abuse of women here, and threaten non-Muslims, that is a form of imperialism too. Our governments know this, and are deliberately encouraging via the welfare state this massive immigration to destabilise the Western world. That doesn't mean our governments like Muslims, any more than affirmative action means our governments like black people. It's just that governments will be nice to people - when it benefits them (they pay Muslims to come here and promote Sharia with one hand, while bombing Muslims in Pakistan with the other).

The Christian-Muslim war is so needless, and promoted by the usual warmongers. I am not a Christian myself but I appreciate that Christianity is the tradition here in the West, and that Muslims the world over have frequently persecuted Christians among other non-Muslims when they come into contact. Whoever you are you have a right to defend yourself. But nobody benefits from this senseless conflict, save the chosen elite.

The key to ending the Holywar, is to expose the false flag terror and other media circus events that cause it to keep flaring up, and to expose the real agenda of Islamification, which benefits not at all Muslims, but the objectives of the Illuminati AAA supremacists, who often try to pin their crimes on Muslims. 9/11 7/7 etc.

Polarisation 101: Hamas Tells West To Stop Supporting Israel

Hamas are the other side of the coin, simply. One should take note of the Rothschild British Empire's role in seeding the modern Arab-Israeli conflict, firstly, and secondly, this is a rather obvious example of the attempt to polarise Western people on this issue.

Time to take a step back and look at the motives of Hamas and the Israeli government here. Hamas are no better than the Israeli government in many regards. They maintain their power over an impoverished, disposessed Palestine, and incite it (with a lot of help from the genocidal Israeli government, who also benefit from the perpetual conflict) to war. Israel however kills far far more Palestinians than Palestine kills Israelis, far more. Maybe this has something to do with Israel having a very high tech modern armed force, paid for by Western (primarily US) taxpayers (who can forget this), and them thar Palestinians having rocks and slingshots, and the occasional old rocket.

Israel has worse publicity today than ever before. In order to 'win' at PR, you would think Hamas would just shut up and let Israel's atrocities do the talking. If, that is, Hamas' goal was to secure self determination for the Palestinian people.

But that isn't Hamas' goal, is it? Hamas benefits from the ongoing war every bit as much as the Israeli government does, don't kid yourself.

You can spot who is serving the agenda, because they always, always (they can't help it) wade into the middle of the arena and stir shit up gratuitously. To, as a Palestinian representative, say that Western people 'live worse than animals', just as public opinion in the West has been shifting against Israel. How stupid, or convenient, hmm?

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/you-should-be-ashamed-of-supporting-israel-hamas-tells-west-1.321620

Hamas are traitors to the Palestinian people.

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it"

Graffiti by Banksy.

LaRouche: British Push USA Into Asia Land War (PDF)

No foreign aid to Israel, nor any other country for that matter. Foreign aid from the state is immoral and usually causes trouble.

The Minstrel Boys Aren't Fighting For Freedom

this time, sadly.



No more war for the Crown. For Opium. For Slavery.

BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!!!


With all the budget cuts I wouldn't be surprised if they got abandoned out there on their own.

For now that prospect seems laughable...right?

Aircraft or austerity?
Artillery or austerity?
Fuel or austerity?

A ride home...or austerity?

Danish Leftist Gets Enriched By Stone Throwing Muslims

"Well strictly speaking I do not know what they mean by 'F******* Danes', but I'm sure there must be something to it", he says.



Oh what will it take, to wake up some white people. Honestly.

I give it all away, the whole farm, it's all yours, I'm so sorry, don't hurt me! (goes foetal)

The fact is that almost nobody, except a significant number of white people, truly thinks in these terms of fluffy rainbows and everyone getting along in a diverse multicultural society. It is a lie, just take a look at the 'overwhelming' number of non-whites campaigning against affirmative action and 'positive discrimination'. That is, next to none. And after all, with subservient white people handing out all this free stuff, who can blame them, right?

Look, non whites are not precious flowers, they're pretty tough, and don't need to be followed around everywhere by silly white leftists telling them how opressed they are. That's all I'm saying. In fact you could argue I am a more true supporter of non whites than these lefty types are, because I refuse to patronise anyone with this kind of pathetic pandering, as seen above.

I don't know how the blacks, asians and arabs feel about it, but frankly the whole thing makes me hurl, and would still do so if it were white people getting the pet treatment from these strange Commie types.

If you're non white, good for you, look out for your own. If you're white, time to realise that Marxist/Frankfurterschule 'anti-racism', forced integration and 'multiculturalism' are only being implemented in traditionally white countries, and within those countries they are pretty much solely aimed at white people, and that is so for a very clear reason. Of course the AAA affiliated 'white' people will not get shafted by this, but if you're not chosen, then you are the proverbial red squirrel here.

September 11th...1941

Charles Lindbergh speech against American involvement in WW2. Despite his flaws in some regards (I presume he was AAA affiliated?), at least he tried to stop the war.



Oh yeah, and Pearl Harbor...well...we know the US government was breaking all Japanese codes from well before PH happened, and we know that oddly all US aircraft carriers were out at sea just leaving the useless old battleships to be destroyed, and due to PH US public opinion swayed away from the America Firsters (Noninterventionists) and towards Throne of David Firsters (Interventionists), ah isn't history wonderful? A little repetitive sometimes.

About Ahmadinejad's 9/11 Comments...

As usual, all show and ceremony, propaganda and subversion

Many people are aware of the Hegelian process by which public opinion has been shaped throughout history. That is, if you control both the thesis and the antithesis, you can 'lead' the unsuspecting member of the public towards a predetermined synthesis, a controlled outcome.

This is most apparent in the political clash of left wing and right wing. To spot what the agenda, the planned synthesis, really is, you must look NOT at what they disagree on - but what they AGREE on.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a Iew. Like the English and Saudi royals are. Crypto of course.

So?

As usual, it's not what they disagree on, but what they agree on that counts. And so I give you...

http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/strenger-than-fiction/strenger-than-fiction-ahmadinejad-s-lesson-for-the-free-world-1.315522

Note that within a couple of paragraphs the article veers off into talking about how stupid Americans are?

And note that Ahmadinejad blames the US (aka Great Satan) for 9/11.

Anteye-Americanism.

The common bond breaching this Hegelian false conflict.

USA is being dismantled by design, and as goes America so goes the West. China is the new British Empire; America has been used, a necessary evil to TPTB, and is now being thrown away.

The perpetrators of 9/11 and 7/7 were MI6-Mossad-CIA, and that is a hierachial order IMO. The AAA, like I said. Saying America did 9/11 is like saying Britain did 7/7. Partly true, but kind of misleading.

There are a lot of paralells between Ahmadinejad and Hitler, in truth. The real Hitler I mean, not the fake pop culture six million version. Both are controlled opposition, Pied Pipers. Look at what Hitler brought upon the Germans. I just hope that Mahmoud doesn't provide pseudo-justification for similar atrocities against the Ayranian people, who by and large like the Germans just want to live free in their own country, as far as I an tell. (There is no persecution of Jews in Iran; if there was they would want to leave, but they don't. Although the first paragraph of this gave me a chuckle nonetheless. Oh I believe that wholeheartedly. Such poysecution.)

But then the Iraqis and Afghans, as many faults as they no doubt may have, also just wanted to be left alone, didn't they. Hell, people in Europe want nothing more than that, but they have the EU shafting them with their bureaucratic nonsense and free trade/open border policies.

So anyway, that's my take on Ahmadinejad. Provocateur, saboteur, trouble maker, small time tyrant. But hey at least he is no longer saying that 19 alcohol drinking, radical Muslim Saudis led by Donkey Kong Osama bin Laden, did 9/11. That is an even stupider and false thing to say.

9 Years Into The Act

Curtain raised with a hellish wicker man sacrifice, trauma, bleeding and blaming, cheering useful idiot Arabs followed by cheering useful idiot Westerners. All fooled.

As long as you remember, Muslims did 9/11. Never forget that. That way the Act can keep going. And after all maybe we like the Act. Maybe we "like to watch the plane coming in".

If you've been keeping up with Aloysius' writings on Makow's site you'll know the satanists do seem to believe they're giving us what we want.

Maybe some Muslims think they had done 9/11, but it's just 'wishful' thinking. Come back when you can fly Cessnas you imposteur saboteurs.

Justice or justus.

Over to you.

The USA's Support For The Ayatollahs

(Aangirfan)

According to Andrew Gavin Marshall, at Global Research, 5 September 2010, (The “Arc of Crisis”):

When Jimmy Carter became President, his government decided to support the Ayatollahs in Iran.

In 1978, Zbigniew Brzezinski referred to "an arc of crisis" and according to Time magazine, in January 1979, the "center of gravity of this arc is Iran, the world's fourth largest oil producer."

According to Peter Dale Scott, in The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America, "There was this idea that the Islamic forces could be used against the Soviet Union."

Full Article

I Don't Support the Destruction of Christianity, Either

"We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." - Albert Pike (alleged), 'Three World Wars' letter

This is a difficult one because on one hand I am not a Christian, I do not view the Bible as the Word of God, and I do not believe that only through faith in this one (admirable) fellow, we can avoid being burnt for all eternity by God, who of course loves us very much. Three thousand years' worth of Stockholm Syndrome and endless war and killing of 'heretics' have not convinced me.

The last attempt at global governance (before the modern NWO) was via the Pope and the Vatican, who had so much power that kings and queens swore allegiance to him, and he would mediate in European elite disputes.

The number killed during 'Christian' campaigns, the Crusades, Colonialism, may even surpass the death toll of Communism in the 20th century, thus making institutional Christianity or more generally institutional monotheism, Judaism-Christianity-Islam, the deadliest ideology in history. And remember that there are lots of good people who are Christians or Jews or Muslims, just like there are lots who were Marxists back when that was fashionable, or today subscribe to proto-Marxist 'progressive' ideology.

There's the whole Jordan Maxwell angle that says Popeye is still running the show but in my humble opinion he lost that game of chess a long time ago. At least it seems so. Templars/Masons/Talmudists/(Protestants?) vs Vatican, sort of a medieval Alien vs Predator, whoever wins we lose. And the Vatican lost. You certainly don't pay taxes to the Vatican, or if you do (I guess in Italy?) it's not much, not like the good old days of Pardon bribes, and the Vatican doesn't offer you AAA derivatives or low rate adjustable mortgages or carbon credits.

Taking it back to Communism again, I am happy to generalise, as are most people, and say that Communism was evil as a whole, regardless the 'useful idiots' who naively helped the manipulators implement it, and make no mistake this still happens today. (At least when the evil in the right wing wants to kill lots of people, they're pretty open about it. There's a difference between 'bomb bomb bomb Iran' and 'pursue equality and tolerance for all people and end discrimination', yet ultimately giving power to the people preaching either will result in millions of dead.)

However I cannot bring myself to make the same generalisation of Christians. One, because so many Christians are staunchly anti-Marxist, anti-social engineering. Two, because Christianity is to many people not just a source, but the source for their moral values, most of which are commendable. And three, because as in the quote at the start of this post, the NWO agenda is to destroy all religions, and all nations, in order to implement a corporate communist world government and a new Dark Ages under a new world church with a new world god, presumably. In other words, Christianity is fair game for criticism because it is no longer much use, just like you can criticise the Nazis but you cannot criticise the Communists, because one ideology has already run its course and the other is still alive and very much part of the game plan.

I'd take them over the Ba'hai or any other freak show any day. It is Christians who tend to be the most upstanding for genuine family values and not for the subversive elements of feminism (please note I said 'elements' there), as well as the hedonistic drugs-violence-sex corporate societal overload, the atrocious degenerate/ritual pop culture, and the promotion of homosexuality and gender distortion (the latter of which again is one of those 'subversive elements' of feminism).

Again, I'm having to hedge here, just so there's no misunderstanding. Christians calling for gays to be killed 'because it says so in the Bible' (how many people have died due to that one? or the qu'ran etc), very bad. Homosexual elements of the establishment calling for kids in school to be taught 'gay tolerance' etc, and largely the same groups along with the paedophiles calling for sex education of younger and younger kids, also very bad. And Christians being arrested (by a "LGBT Liason Officer", no less? Where is the Herterosexual Liason Officer hmm?) because they say that homosexuality is a sin according to Christian teaching, because 'someone might get offended', plain wrong. Got it?

So no, I don't support the Antichrist-ian Commies or the brave new world they are creating, in which ultimately all children are to be raised by the state and molded into perfect citizens. Can you imagine what our ancestors would have thought of the concept of "Hate Speech". Oh, unless it was blasphemous speech against the Church, of course. Ah yes, that was the Old World Order...

Nothing new about the NWO, except those who we will be revering will have changed slightly, outwardly at least. If you want to know where the power lies, ask who you cannot criticise. Those who you can criticise are not really in power.

Form A Line

Just like WW1 huh? Gangs. So who is Franz Ferdinand then?

China investment in Iran worries US

"Washington is worried that Iran continues to attract investment from China despite a new round of UN Security Council sanctions imposed on Tehran, a US official says.

Chinese companies were "aggressive" in investing in Iran's oil and gas fields, Joseph Christoff, head of the Government Accountability Office's international affairs and trade department, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday.

Christoff says international and unilateral sanctions were "not changing their (the Chinese) behavior" toward Iran.

Addressing the same panel, another official said that the US will press China to abide by international sanctions on Iran.

"China is of concern to us," AFP quoted Robert Einhorn, special adviser for nonproliferation and arms control at the State Department, as saying on Thursday. "We need for them to enforce the Security Council resolution," he said.

Beijing should not "backfill" by doing business with Tehran while other countries are "distancing themselves from Iran," Einhorn said.

The US and its Western allies accuse Iran of seeking a military nuclear program. Tehran rejects the charges, stressing that as a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty it will not forgo its right to peaceful nuclear technology.

The UN Security Council adopted a US-drafted sanctions resolution on June 9. Ever since the US, European Union, Australia, and Canada have adopted unilateral sanctions against Iran.

However, China and Russia, two permanent members of the UNSC, as well as many other countries say they would not abide by the unilateral sanctions."

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=136724§ionid=351020101

Latino Brown Beret: "Go back to Europe"

It's funny how she has light eyes which denote that she should probably send half or maybe a quarter of herself back to Europe too. That's a fair point actually - why aren't Mexicans demanding all the white or part-white people of European descent in Mexico, "go home" first? They were the Conquistadores, were they not? Hypocrisy at all?



They're not shy about it. You think they are coming to bring you a warm Diversity embrace? LMAO

Oh, because it's a foundation front movement to destabilise the southwestern US, that's why it doesn't have to be consistent. I would never have guessed...

Question - if racism is an inborn characteristic of white people, what exactly, then, is anti-racism?

And I'm sick of this racist spiel. You reach a point where the supposed fight against racism becomes a fight against reality, like all proto-Marxist ideology.

Take feminism. Okay, equal rights for people, fine, but who is going to be the one to say that maybe men and women are different and that isn't a bad thing, and a better route would be to appreciate and work with what is real rather than continue to preach the unreal, harming people in the process? There is a difference between 'equal', in terms of respect and dignity and value, which people should be, and 'the same'. That's what I'm saying.

What they call Diversity is a lie, and it isn't going to end well for all concerned. All puppets in a game you don't even know you're part of. I'll tell you this for free...most people who believe in Diversity do not practice what they preach (and for that matter have no idea what they're really preaching), and while I understand that, I don't like hypocrites.

Wind turbines and mosques. The new temples of the cultural-awareness-seminar attending leftist. But on your doorstep? "Ohhhh nooooooo not meeeeee, I didn't mean anywhere near meeeeee, anywhere else is fine as long as we elite white leftists get to stay in our homogenous compound with armed guards".

White flight. How can you flee from something unless you're being pursued? What is pursuing you? Be honest. Tell the truth. Come on, spit it out. You're a Racist running away from Diversity*, aren't you? Yes you are. You all are. Because this word was invented and manipulated by us, the social engineers, to apply to all of you and make you quiver at its very mentioning...I said quiver, now!

That's better. Serf.

*of course, all nonwhite ethnic groups to some extent look out for themselves and self segregate of their own free will (eg 'Chinatown'), presumably because they - God forbid - don't really like Diversity either; but they are not called Racist for doing so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-segregation

"Auto-segregation (self-segregation) is the separation of a religious or ethnic group from the rest of society in a state by the group iself. Through auto-segregation, the members of the separate group can establish their own services, and maintain their own traditions and customs.

For example, some world tribes have preferred to stay in reservations and not to integrate with the rest of the state's population. By remaining in a reservation or on their original lands, they can preserve their language and beliefs.

On the other hand, some supremacist groups self-segregate to avoid integrating with other groups that they consider inferior. Racists, radical Islamists, Orthodox Jews, ultranationalists and other supremacist or ethno-centric groups commonly segregate themselves from other communities through various practices like endogamy."

So what's the difference (above) between 'some world tribes' who want to 'preserve their language and beliefs', and 'supremacist groups' who want to 'avoid integrating'? NOTHING except the Newspeak. Hypocrisy is a bitch.

How the US Army is being usurped

I think this is important, because often people say "but the soldiers are our sons, brothers etc, they wouldn't do anything to us". Well, yeah, but not all of them, huh?

'Scary' growth of gangs in war zones

Image Source - Gangs of Iraq

Also - this is perhaps the beginning of a future trend in military recruitment - American-based PMCs and to a lesser extent the US Army are recruiting non-US citizens and even people who have never set foot on American soil, offering US citizenship in return for doing tours in Iraq/Afghan/whereverthebankstersbombnext.

I am not aware of the British Army getting up to these kind of tricks - yet - and generally, as far as I am aware, foreigners in Britain are unlikely to join the military, especially Muslims obviously (and why should they want to oppress their relatives?). The economic crisis has eased the difficulty of military recruitment sadly (plenty of people still willing to fight for Rothschild) , not that I disrespect soldiers, because I don't, but the utter waste and exploitation of soldiers...sickening. But then, when was it not?

Anyway I would have little doubt that most British or American soldiers would disobey any order to subjugate their own people (even if it is imposed incrementally, which it obviously will be). But bring in people who have no loyalty, or even in some cases hate the citizens of the country whose government they are serving, and then you've got a different scenario. Gangbangers earning their stripes? Welcome to the 21st century, when the state starts to reveal itself as the gang it is.

War Is A Ritual, or Don't Bomb My Tax Haven Please

First let us take a look at the largely static trench systems of WW1. Here's a map of where the rabble obediently fought over land not big enough to bury the dead.

Notice anything unusual?

The machine gun/infantry predicament made it inevitable that the stalemate would ensue from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. Except one place where an invisible force field (kidding...or am I?) prevents the trenches from expanding into.

And don't buy their explanation that the Swiss were 'neutral'. Belgium was neutral, but the Germans marched right over them regardless in an attempt to outflank the French. So some are more neutral than others, hmm?

And again in WW2. When our chaps were taken POW, where did they run to? Home? That's a lot more difficult than running to der Schweitz, again neutral, and being flown home from this 'neutral' country!

If you were commanding ze Germans in WW2, and unlike Hitler you actually were trying to win, you surely would annex Switzerland immediately and cancel out its neutral status. It would be easy and it would solve a lot of problems, including the easy escape for POWs.

So what do we make of this situation? Two world human sacrifices, and this little neutral country - despite both times offering a strategic advantage to those who would violate its neutrality - remains unscathed (while others like Belgium and Holland are not so lucky).

Magick? Bank accounts?

Bank accounts.

But whose? Be Eye Ssss

"The BIS is also a frequent target of allegations by conspiracy theorists, many of whom portray it as a front organization through which a wealthy elite controls the world. Some argue that the bank has not helped matters through a culture of secretiveness"

Before any misunderstanding is made, I like Switzerland, especially their neutrality and their militia. But it must be understood that the finance oligarchs have done everything to undermine the neutrality and sovereignty of other nations; they only let places like der Schweitz exist because it suits them. Free trade + bailouts for the banksters, green economy adventure for us. Simple equation.

Did I mention that the Square Mile of London is a tax haven? Yet, it's such a 'good', 'sneaky' tax haven, it somehow does not appear on most lists of tax havens. (Take a look for yourself here)

"London richly deserves its place on the list too. It’s not just because many of the more "usual suspect” jurisdictions–everywhere from Jersey to the Cayman Islands–are all beneficiaries of British protection and support. The truth is that each of these operates as a branch office for the City of London, the square mile that is the epicenter of finance in London.

The City is almost a government in and of itself, within the U.K., wholly captured and controlled by the finance industry that holds for ransom the rest of its economy. From there untold flows move around the world, many hidden by that ultimate British secrecy invention: the trust. Because of the financial power of the City–seen time and time again during the current economic crisis–the government of the U.K. seems quite unable to challenge it, and the transactions the City wants to execute."

Square Mile too secretive, says report

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the slaves
Britons never never never shall make waves
?

Gordon Duff: Broken Arrow, The Most Dangerous Weapons Of All

The hunt for missing nukes and those that covered it up.

Here

It's quite a read. Take it or leave it.

Who is that guy really? Are we supposed to believe that nuclear proliferation is basically down to one lone nut? Yeah, another 'lone nut' like Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden. lmao. These lone nuts pick the right things to be 'lone' and 'nutty' about don't they?

Lest we forget the global HQ is London btw and has been for centuries now (since the Merchants of Venice waned?). With the Noo Yoik-Tel Aviv mafia right behind them.

Pat Buchanan - America's Becoming a Babylon Tower (try 'the entire West' not just America)

You think the same destabilisation game isn't going on in Europe?

Russia Today interview

"“Native born Americans of European descent are the ones who are really angriest at the enormous numbers of illegal aliens marching into the country, many if not most of them from the third world, changing the character and composition of their country and eventually voting them out of power,” states Buchanan.

With about 100-135 million Hispanic citizens in the US and heavily concentrated in the American southwest by 2050, “politically it will probably remain the US, ethnically, culturally and linguistically it could very well be a part of Mexico as of the US.”

“Native born white and African Americans are leaving California,” Buchanan points out, adding “we are going to cease to be a nation and become more of an internal empire like the old Roman Empire.”

Further, the fastest growing TV and radio stations in the US are Hispanic, which enables the newcomers not to assimilate into American society and learn the English language.

“They do not immerse themselves into American culture, they bring their own culture and maintain it. How can you say we are fellow citizens if we can’t even talk to each other?” asks Buchanan."

Multiculturalism is a nice way of saying Cultural Ethnic Cleansing

You want my take - it's simple. You can say what you like, even to yourself, but the truth is most people - black white asian jewish whatever - are quiet and polite segregationists, as demonstrated by their actions. (I mean, what do you think 'Chinatown' is, really?) That does not infer they are vile-seething-with-hatred types; by contrast, unlike the lowly blogger who may feel pressured to conform when dealing with taboo topics (how self-referential of me), you will find that the mostly subconscious human instinct makes no such concessions for political correctness.

The NWO agenda is therefore to exploit this reality and create a patchwork of squabbling ethnic enclaves throughout the Western world, which by its very nature will prevent any Western nation from being stable or upstanding. Biiiiiig distraction from the other economic rape going on. War within and war without; the perfect storm you could say.

(The truth is they're still scared to do much except pick off lone weak targets. Wait until they are the majority. You know I'm right.)

Just don't enter the Muslim side of town or they'll slit your kaffir throat and drag you behind a pickup truck. Kosher. Or is that Halal? I'm losing track of all those who want us dead and their weird obsessions with barbaric ritual slaughter. But I can count on one hand those who are really orchestrating all this crap from their (sometimes literal) castles.

Here's a way to look at it. Battlefield metaphor. Suppose a mortar crew are firing at you. (Sadly in this case most people have no idea there is a mortar crew firing, they presumably think it just rains mortars naturally. Muppets.) Do you try to shelter from each incoming mortar round and hope it stops, or do you move to snuff out the mortar crew and their usourious bloodline basterd commander first?

Enough said.

Now you see why the single-issue anti-Islam sites are fronts, because you see who benefits from them. In this case the enemy of our enemy is most certainly not our friend. In fact I reckon I have much closer to a common cause with an average Iranian than...well you know.

I for one blame monotheism, the schizophrenic murderous unholy trinity that it is; it has wrought more misery and death on the world than anything else including Marxism even. Worth remembering that monotheism is not indigenously European and was forced upon us, and many of our ancestors perished fighting against its evil imposition. It caused untold book burnings and the subsequent Dark Ages. And then we, Stockholm Syndrome complete, obediently forced it upon others during Colonialism. That's an occult mind virus if ever there was one. Amen.

Can You Visualise 21st Century Conscription?

What would it be like? In the semi-apocalyptic event that would be a third world war, probably at this point a land war in the Middle East between the Zionists and the Arab nations with US-Brit-European and Russo-Chinese support respectively, what on earth would we be thinking to go along with this btw, I mean, could it happen? Let's give war a chance for a moment and speculate.

(I think it would be quite easy to conscript millions of people in any Western nation today. All it would take is a switch in coverage of the brainwashing MSM for a few months)

"From the ages of 18 to 27, every Russian male is subject to callup. Those who cannot avoid the draft spend two years in grim, impersonal institutions that at best are brutal and at worst, fatal." (And believe me I've read One Soldier's War in Chechnya, that is no understatement, they beat people to death in training)

1. Nuclear Weapons.

Has to be the first port of call in this discussion. I cannot see there being a major conflict without both sides having at least one nuclear armed nation. I am pro-nuke and believe the nuclear weapon acts as a deterrent between nations the same way that firearms act as a deterrent protecting individuals from the criminal minded. As evidence for this I cite the abundant lack of actual warfare between nuclear armed nations. (Thankfully!) Without nukes there would already have been a land war, probably in the 50s or early 60s, between Russia and the US, fought across Germany and the rest of Europe.

Yet while nuclear weapons act as a deterrent, the possibility of a nuclear war is always there, if a little cliche, almost humourous, something one is not supposed to take seriously in these modern, 'can't-we-all-just-get-along' times. Well that's exactly the problem from the rulers' point of view - the idea that we can all just get along without mutilating each other on a regular basis, now that is bad for business, especially aethereal business. The interdimensional birds go hungry.

So I envisage some kind of (real or fake) scrapping of nuclear weapons, or event in which both sides destroy each others' nuclear capabilities, for instance it may turn out that anti-ballistic missile technology is far superior to the incoming missiles, or that both sides simply agree not to use nukes at all. Probably for environmental reasons. Can you imagine that? "Greening" warfare? Green = Death, get that straight. And I don't mean military green, not in this case, I mean Gaia Green. Less lead, more dead.

There is definitely something absurd about a death machine being environmentally friendly. Although what exactly I'm not sure. After all, if humans are the problem to the environment, then a few million dead humans can only benefit the ecosystem, right? The more the merrier.

I doubt nuclear warfare would actually occur. Although, who knows, certainly the prospect of staging a nuclear event and blaming it on Iran is veeeery much in the, ahem, pipeline. And if you don't think Mossad has nukes under every major Western city, my question to you is why on earth do all Western governments grovel to and worship them hmm? Might want to consider moving a little away from London, NY or any other would be target with that scenario in mind, and stay the hell away from events that may be targeted by nuclear terrorism - #1 on my personal list is the Zion Olympics in London. I have a feeling HM will be somewhere else during that event. I may be wrong of course but I will not risk being vapourised to prove it.

2. Would They? Conscription for a Third World War.

Okay so let's suppose there is a war declared by the financial oligarchs (and of course it won't be fought by them), between Israel-US-UK-Europe and Iran-Syria-Russia-possibly China. Not as one sided as you might think, oh no.

In order for any Western nation to fight a major war, due to the small scale of their volunteer military forces, they would be obliged to conscript people in some capacity. Remember that I am not talking about a likely scenario here, but it is a distinct possibility if we follow previous patterns of economic pillage followed by world war to drown the evidence in blood.

First I ask you this - instead of thinking how ludicrous it would be for our nation and others to be involved in a major war this decade, which you might well do so, consider the position the banking families are in. Their almost-100-year age of debt based fiat currencies has finally brought the world's richest nations to the brink of collapse. The game is up. The internet is exposing them. What did Hitler do in 1944 when his little game of toy soldiers was clearly coming to an end? He attacked with what he had left, and heck it almost paid off did it not?

These rats, when backed into a corner, will do anything before they bite the cyanide in their bunkers. Yes you and I may be afraid of what lies in the future, but believe me they are more scared of us, by orders of magnitude, than we are of them. Their game is death and misery and control. Without control they are without purpose. The psychopath is enslaved by this game - the game of controlling others. And so, behind the facade of invincibility, we find scared little children afraid of anything they don't control.

And you're telling me they wouldn't start a world war to hold onto their power???

Conscription is a laughable prospect in the modern era, rightfully so. Look at the obesity and unfitness of the people. It is a joke, right? Can you imagine your neighbours, all of them of fighting age, carrying rucksacks and rifles all day? Absurd!

How many would refuse? How many would refuse on conscientious grounds? How many would refuse because they're simply too lazy? I remember what passed for PE at school. LOL! No discipline in this generation. I know it's a cliche but seriously, I can't imagine it. Conscription.

Maybe that's why ObamaChangeCameron want us to all do National Service again. Teach those kids to obey the government's orders. Kill! Kill! No, stop snoozing in front of the TV, we only brainwashed you with that to make you more submissive until we needed you. Now we need you! Kill!

Can you imagine David Cameron or Nick Clegg, we will fight them in the mountains and on the pipelines, the poppy fields and in the streets, oh boy that would be something. Some things don't change though - Churchill was an Illuminist, a NWO Zionist same as Hitler, all part of the big human sacrificing game.

If you don't think conscription is possible, just take a look at the British recruits for the Boer War:
There was also embarrassment at the poor health of the British recruits, with up to 40% being found unfit for military service. Most were suffering from poverty-related illnesses such as rickets. Concern over the health of the recruits coincided with increasing concern for the general state of the poor in Britain.

They'll take you short tall fat skinny living dead you will all be seated or propped upright where necessary to grease the wheels of death. It may take a fighting fit young soldier to carry a full pack and weapon on patrol but any slob can man a UAV right here at home from his or her armchair. I have a feeling that may well be one of the darker future applications of the internet. Heck, flying UAV's is child's play, right? And children don't need to know the ins and outs of what they're doing so let's call it a game, right? But for now that's all future talk.

3. Are We Being Prepared For What's To Come?

My immediate answer to this is a definite Yes.

Just look at all the apocalyptic themed games, movies; anyone who has seen the 28 ____ Later films will recognise they are preparing current and future military/police to view 'infected' citizens as the enemy. One may even suggest that preparation culminated in the swine flu epic failure of 2009. I Am Legend also referenced this theme, and the number of videogames on the subject is ludicrous. The concept really became a pop culture phenomenon; but has it primed the emerging generation for such an event in reality?

I have written many times, criticising the military themed games that are designed to desensitise their audience to the horrors of war. Now science fictional violence is one thing. Semi-realistic military based violence (primarily against Russians and Arabs btw, take note of your future 'enemy') is another. Recruitment to the US Army must be increased by their game America's Army, otherwise they would not continually update it, and keep on providing it for free. I have read what people have said before, about actually signing up for armed services literally based on a video game. Sad but true.

The other angle is the apocalyptic-nuclear war theme in games like Fallout, I guess of course the Terminator films, and the US TV show Jericho (not seen personally but lots of CT types are always citing it).

Now there is always argument whenever pop culture is cited as 'evidence' of the intent of the ruling class. Let me refute some of the common criticisms:

- They don't know what the oligarchs are planning.
No, the people who run the entertainment industry are by contrast closely connected to the oligarchy and their black magick 'religion'; see Vigilant Citizen for excellent exposes on this.

- They're just entertaining you.
Certainly, these storylines can be riveting, but when they seem to predict real life events like 9/11 or the Gulf Oil disaster (or these are remarkable coincidences), closer attention must be paid to the content of current media which may contain warnings of future events.

- They are independent of the government.
No, or not always; often films like Machete, which is designed to ignite ethnic conflict in America, or Black Hawk Down, which was one of several pro-interventionist films (also Tears of the Sun) that conveniently came out before 9/11 to get people ready for war, will have government funding. BHD (I've seen the making of where they admit it, the USgov were the only people they could get UH60s from so they say, and in return they let USgov influence the script and write out the bad stuff like the massacre of Somali elders by gunship as they were discussing how to make peace with the Americans, which is largely greased over in most histories of that period) and Machete definitely have both had government support, ie they are direct government propaganda productions.

4. How Would You React To A Conscription Event?

What military training is designed to do, among other things, is pre-program the recruit with set responses to extreme and difficult situations. This kind of prepatory mindset is not only for soldiers, however. How would you, the citizen, behave in the event of the outbreak of a global conflict?

You'd be surprised how many people would simply enlist if they are told to, I think. If everyone else is doing it, that will be enough. That's not necessarily me criticising people who do enlist in the military; I think them to be courageous, yes, but misguided and exploited also. Now if they were simply defending their country, not their corporate MI bosses' opium fields thousands of miles away, I would have a very diferent answer.

But the truth is that 'war', ie the mass consumption of human life, has never been required and never will be; on the contrary, war is to the rulers of the world the highest purpose, not a means to an end (ie freedom/safety etc, the way the pro-war proles see it) but the highest end in itself.

Without this realisation I am not surprised if you laugh at the prospect of a large scale land war with some form of conscription in our time. But take it or leave it, don't say people haven't told you before it begins. The very thing which is often (sadly) called 'paranoia' today, is what may prevent future atrocities. Look at how THEY got their arses handed to them over swine flu, say what you will that was a major victory IMO. World war is the standard last resort and, in this era of unfolding chaos, all the cards are going to be in play. We must prevent further wars as things collapse, so the criminals responsible can be identified and prosecuted.

And then following the collapse, there shall be a NWO. But whose?...

The Shape of Things to Come

Israeli Mossad Attempt to Assassinate Turkish PM?

quote,
The Israeli intelligence agency Mossad has failed in an attempt to assassinate Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a Jordanian weekly says.

Informed sources in Turkey say that the Mossad plot has been foiled by the country's security forces, al-Manar quoted a report in the most recent edition of the Al-Majd weekly as saying.

There are also reports that Israel has been trying to incite violence inside Turkey by lending support to the militants of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).

Earlier in June, Sedat Laciner, the head of the International Strategic Research Organization — a Turkish think tank — said Mossad agents and Israeli military retirees had been sighted providing training to PKK militants in Iraqi Kurdistan.

Laciner said Tel Aviv does not have a positive perception of Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party, which is led by Erdogan.

After an Israeli attack on a Gaza-bound flotilla that left nine Turkish citizens dead on May 31, Ankara drew up a roadmap to "completely" cut its ties with Israel.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul had earlier announced that a roadmap would be prepared on the issue of sanctions against Israel.

"The roadmap details a process through which Turkey will completely cut its ties with Israel" in several stages, Turkish daily Today's Zaman reported on June 17.

Original Article

It's only gonna escalate. World wars are always visible long before they start. Neither Israel nor the Arab world are friends or allies of us and we should not under any circumstance seek to be militarily involved over there. Mind our own business. (Of course, our governments have different ideas...)