Older Posts
-
▼
2009
(555)
-
▼
Jul 2009
(33)
- National ID card a 'no brainer' says home secretary
- World Food Programme short on funds
- Give pregnant women a swine flu shot
- Federal Reserve approval falling: new poll
- H1N1 vaccine: 10 things you're not supposed to know
- 1993 Cartoon Depicts Chip Implantation
- People scavenging meat from wild lions...poor lion...
- Poor De Beers losing profits (sob)
- Gerald Celente: Gold, Frankenfoods, Obamageddon
- Pro-Gun in UK: Dying Breed or Silent Masses?
- Jane Burgermeister
- Conservatives will 'save' economy by licking BoE b...
- How would you like a world war?
- The People shoot down pro-Fed economists
- More on the Times removing Flu article comments
- Metallica - Don't Tread On Me
- Inoculation Squads at your door!
- Swine Flu "Cultured in a Laboratory"
- Israeli Govt hires pro-Israel Talkbackers
- Times scrubs comments from Flu Vaccine article
- The Day It Rained Jelly
- Let CATO settle the healthcare debate
- Stuff to read
- Corporate Environmentalists Defacing our Flag
- Liberty Activist pays property taxes in $1 bills
- But we don't hear about China
- Beating the Drums
- Vaccinating Children While They Sleep
- Blame America First
- Forced Vaccinations in Norway
- Illuminati, Nazis, hidden history
- Educate Before You Vaccinate
- US paid Afghan militants to destabilise Iraq...
-
▼
Jul 2009
(33)
Undebunkable Chemtrails Video That The "Debunkers" Ignore...
...and yes, Chemtrails interfere with weather
(but why they are used, no-one fully knows...)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)
2 comments:
Im not exactly sure what to say... I mean... free speech is free speech...but it is limited... Public property, yes, you should have unlimited free speech. Public places are considered public...Parks, Streets, Etc Etc... Government buildings are "Public Funded" by taxation, but DO have rules and an owner to the property. (Or someone in charge of the property) In effect, that person has the rights to eject someone disrupting OTHER citizens. Just because I pay for the police to own weapons, and they are in a "Public Building." I do not expect access to the firearms, nor expect to drive their police cars. This guys point, is NOT illegal until he refused to leave the property for disrupting other peoples days. I mean, if I had somewhere to go and this dude was making a big deal of things and making me late, I'd punch him in the throat. Besides, I DO not feel like I have to deal with someone video taping my transaction in the background. That's a violation of MY rights. I guess that didn't matter to him when someone told him exactly that?
Rules are rules, dick. (Dude in the video, not you AdamS.) By being polite and well spoken, you are not granted an "Asshole Pass" and have the right to ruin other people's days.
(I agree with some of the stuff he says, but people that plan things poorly like this make the rest of the movement look ridiculous, idiotic, and careless of anyone but themselves.
But showing the property tax in $1 bills was a nice touch.
"In effect, that person has the rights to eject someone disrupting OTHER citizens."
Correct, but were others getting offended here? It doesn't seem to be the case here.
"Besides, I DO not feel like I have to deal with someone video taping my transaction in the background. That's a violation of MY rights. I guess that didn't matter to him when someone told him exactly that?"
But I bet there is CCTV filming transactions all day long. (just saying, as usual with govt, they are being hypocritical.)
"I agree with some of the stuff he says, but people that plan things poorly like this make the rest of the movement look ridiculous, idiotic, and careless of anyone but themselves."
To an extent I agree; though overall I believe this did more good than harm. It helps raise the idea that, not only are governments trying to set tyranny upon us, they have got us paying them to do so. What an audacious scam that is.
Post a Comment