Thursday, 9 September 2010
The Communists' Shifting Definition of 'Hate'
This poster is racist, I'm complaining to the...er...the...?
Many people do hate, including in the political arena. Although a lot of hatred stems from personal issues, for example someone might hate the Brits if their family has suffered at the hands of the Crown, or one may hate Americans because the CIA has meddled in their country, or one may hate cats because they have just never got along with cats, hatred can also be much more subtle and be brought about by, essentially, brainwashing. Or to use a more polite term, propaganda.
In general hatred is not psychologically beneficial to an individual. It is certainly not helpful to the hated. So in general hatred makes losers all round, although I would certainly not criticise anyone who has justified hatred or anger over a wrong.
But what constitutes hatred? How does society, that is, the majority of society who are to a large extent under the spell of TPTB, define hatred? And most importantly, is this definition consistent?
Hatred is often simply something the Communist doesn't want to hear.
And by using the term 'Communist', I am referring to all those who deceptively call themselves 'progressives', 'global thinkers', and so on, which constitutes the left wing of the establishment - the right wing being the joint (Christian) Zionist and AngloMasonicBritishIsrael war/drug/terror groups. Really they're all stinking Commies whether they even know what they're serving or not. Well really I don't know what they're serving either, but, another story for another day eh...
So the popular (Communist) conception of what hatred is goes something like this. Racists first, then sexists, then homophobes, then xenophobes and nationalists, then if you're a real hardcore Commie, spieciesists.
It's hateful, for instance, to burn a Quran. But, and I'm not a Christian btw (that would be 'hateful', lol), it's OK for that Yiddish American guy to piss on Jesus for his TV show, that is freedom of speech.
It's hateful to ban a burkha but it's OK to ban employees from wearing cross necklaces.
It's hateful (and sexist!) to say that abortion is wrong but it's OK for pro abortion types to tell young girls, hey, if you get pregnant, don't tell your parents, come and see us, we'll get rid of it for you quietly and the government will pay. Yes that is a paraphrase of something the 'health visitor' who taught us PSE basically told to the girls in my class, who were like 14 at the time. Always remembered that because even back then as an unwilling unwitting participant in John Dewey's Commie Circus it seemed very wrong.
It's hateful to say that women are better homemakers, but it's OK for feminists (can't remember which one) to compare women who choose to be housewives with concentration camp inmates. Y'know, the kind of mindset described here.
Here's one that will really get to some people. It's hateful to say that homosexuality is wrong but it's OK for the media to encourage homosexuality at every turn. Well they do, don't they? And they also attack the herterosexual nuclear family at every turn, do they not? Is that hateful? No, it's 'progressive' of course. Silly me.
Okay then. Let's shift directions a little. It's OK for the crazy Muslims to promote Sharia for the UK etc, or it's OK for the crazy Communist La Raza to declare huge swathes of the US to belong to the Mestizo people exclusively, but it's tough to even argue against illegal immigration without having to open every sentence with "I'm not racist but...", because having a view that stands in the way of Communism is 'hateful'.
It's OK to call the BBC "hideously white" (an asinine charge, I hope that doesn't include BBC's Asian only radio network?), but, at risk of sounding cliche, one can imagine how society would react if the situation was inversed, if someone called their Asian network "hideously brown" for instance.
However, who really hates? I don't.
Who is carrying out this agenda of destroying the West from all angles?
While I am hardly a Christian myself - who takes every opportunity to mock and deride Christianity and spit on Christians?
Who has encouraged, nay paid millions of foreigners to come to Western lands, encouraged them to abuse their hosts at every turn, then told the few natives who dare have a problem with this to shut up and stop being so racist and hateful?
Who has made every attempt to undermine the backbone of a healthy society, the family and related values?
Who promotes Malthusian ideology that humans are a pox on the Earth and need to be reduced or completely wiped out?
Who has distorted the definition of 'hate' to make it seem like they are not the hateful ones, and everyone else is?
Who is making trouble where there need not be any?
Who are the Commies?
- The War on Drugs is a joke!
- September 11th...1941
- Gloating Articles Like These
- Iran Backs Down To Big Banks, Prevents WW3
- Ahmadinejad and 9/11 Again
- Is it impossible to pay off the National Debt?
- 250,000 Racist Children!
- About Ahmadinejad's 9/11 Comments...
- Frank Dikotter and Alex Jones discuss Mao Worship
- Bono and the Lizard Queen - Poverty Pimps
- What is it with the Vatican and Aliens?
- Linsey Lohan has Multiple Personalities...MK Victi...
- What's It Like To Wear A Burka?
- The State Paradox
- "The Independent" throws mud at Russia Today
- Not So Occult Anymore Are You?
- Retarded Communist Students vs BNP in Glasgow
- Poor Run To The Hills
- CNN's Crazy "Jews Did 9/11" Report
- CDC Covers Up Over 1500 Miscarriages From H1N1 Vac...
- Don't Say Dyke
- How Money Is Created By Banks
- Real IRA Says It Will Target Banksters
- Has The North Atlantic Current Stopped Due To Gulf...
- Walk The Tightrope
- Famine Watch: Russia Food Price Controls
- I Support Scottish Independence
- Greenpeace Communist Propaganda
- Bartering in Argentina
- The Pope's Biggest British Critic is Paedophile Sy...
- Well Why Do You Think We're In Afghanistan?
- Agenda 21 Dots
- Somebody Did Burn The Koran...
- I Thought I Recognised Rothschild's Historian
- EDL and Muslim protests in London 9/11 2010
- 9 Years Into The Act
- The Communists' Shifting Definition of 'Hate'
- Scootle on the Quran Burning/Flag Burning on 9/11
- Two Green Movements
- The internet: is it changing the way we think?
- Nice One, David Dees
- Winston Churchill a "gloriously flawed hero"?
- BBC Correspondent Says Mossad Did 9/11
- The USA's Support For The Ayatollahs
- My RFID Bracelet Is Like Soooooo Cooool...
- The Public Health Paradox
- Demonic Tony Blair Unrepentant, Pushes Iran War
- ▼ Sep 2010 (47)
- ► 2009 (555)
And You Tell Me There's No Suppressed Technology?
It's another of those 'conspiracy theories' that good citizens don't notice. Imagine the standard of living if all the secret technology was released to the public...we'd be "free and independent" as JFK said! No more poverty anywhere! Can you imagine being sick enough to withhold such technology from society just to maintain your position of control? (Bearing in mind that we don't know just how much technological capability is being withheld, because, duh, it's secret.) What did Nikola Tesla really develop?
Individual Liberty? But that's "selfish"!
No, we need to look after each other voluntarily without having a government do all that at gunpoint. Sounds absurd at first but soon you realise that the reason it sounds so is because of the very unfree nature of our current existence. Envision greater possibilities! Ok, some kind of massive wake-up would be needed before this kind of free, responsible, uncontrollable society could emerge. And that's what we are seeing day by day in the world - a massive waking up of the previously enslaved masses (including myself I must add!)