How Accurate Are Swine Flu Figures, Really?

We are told the number of new swine flu cases (per week) in Britain has 'doubled' to 9000 last week. But what is this based on? "Well, the number of people diagnosed, of course", you'll tell me.

But how are they diagnosed? By a doctor following an examination? By samples taken and tested for H1N1? No! You get diagnosed from a phone call. And in honesty, you would have little way of telling between 'swine' flu, other strains of flu, and a cold (or even tonsillitis!), least of all over the phone, medical professional or not.

Am I guessing people who don't have swine flu are on Tamiflu? Well, no, because that is inevitable (some are even taking it as a 'preventative', which is insane). What I am guessing is that many or maybe even most of the cases are probably not 'swine' flu. The point is that handing out drugs that can be very harmful, based on one phonecall , is irresponsible - but very profitable for the drug pushers.

Tamiflu is a costly placebo, a Big Pharma fraud

And like the Health Ranger says, nobody in the government/media is talking about Vitamin D, which naturally prevents flu, thus rendering any drug 'treatment' unnecessary.
_______________________________________________________________

And now for some classic FKN Newz. Swine Fear is spreading fast amongst the gullible...



The swine flu call centres where staff have nothing to do but play cards and Trivial Pursuit (nope, that isn't satire)